1
|
Boukovala M, Modest DP, Ricard I, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Peveling Genannt Reddemann C, Graeven U, Schuch G, Schwaner I, Heinrich K, Neumann J, Jung A, Held S, Stintzing S, Heinemann V, Michl M. Evaluation of the inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a post hoc analysis of the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial (AIO KRK0110). ESMO Open 2024; 9:103374. [PMID: 38744100 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) combines serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin and was shown to predict survival in advanced cancer. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of mGPS on survival as well as its predictive value when combined with gender in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy in the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS In XELAVIRI, mCRC patients were treated with either fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab followed by additional irinotecan at first progression (sequential treatment arm; Arm A) or upfront combination of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab/irinotecan (intensive treatment arm; Arm B). In the present post hoc analysis, survival was evaluated with respect to the assorted mGPS categories 0, 1 or 2. Interaction between mGPS and gender was analyzed. RESULTS Out of 421 mCRC patients treated in XELAVIRI, 362 [119 women (32.9%) and 243 men (67.1%)] were assessable. For the entire study population a significant association between mGPS and overall survival (OS) was observed [mGPS = 0: median 28.9 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9-33.6 months; mGPS = 1: median 21.4 months, 95% CI 17.6-26.1 months; mGPS = 2: median 16.8 months, 95% CI 14.3-21.2 months; P < 0.00001]. Similar results were found when comparing progression-free survival between groups. The effect of mGPS on survival did not depend on the applied treatment regimen (P = 0.21). In female patients, a trend towards longer OS was observed in Arm A versus Arm B, with this effect being clearly more pronounced in the mGPS cohort 0 (41.6 versus 25.5 months; P = 0.056). By contrast, median OS was longer in male patients with an mGPS of 1-2 treated in Arm B versus Arm A (20.8 versus 17.4 months; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION We demonstrate the role of mGPS as an independent predictor of OS regardless of the treatment regimen in mCRC patients receiving first-line treatment. mGPS may help identify gender-specific subgroups that benefit more or less from upfront intensive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Boukovala
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - I Ricard
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München
| | | | - T Decker
- Private Oncological Practice, Ravensburg
| | | | - J Uhlig
- Private Oncological Practice, Naunhof
| | - M Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg
| | | | - B Peuser
- Onkologische Praxis am Diakonissenhaus, Leipzig
| | | | | | - U Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach
| | - G Schuch
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Altona, Hamburg
| | - I Schwaner
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm, Berlin
| | - K Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München
| | - J Neumann
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich
| | - A Jung
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - S Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - M Michl
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fischer L, Jiang L, Dürig J, Schmidt C, Stilgenbauer S, Bouabdallah K, Solal-Celigny P, Scholz CW, Feugier P, de Wit M, Trappe RU, Hallek M, Graeven U, Hänel M, Hoffmann M, Delwail V, Macro M, Greiner J, Giagounidis AAN, Dargel B, Durot E, Foussard C, Silkenstedt E, Weigert O, Pott C, Klapper W, Hiddemann W, Unterhalt M, Hoster E, Ribrag V, Dreyling M. The addition of bortezomib to rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma-a randomized, open-label phase III trial of the European mantle cell lymphoma network. Leukemia 2024:10.1038/s41375-024-02254-2. [PMID: 38678093 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The therapy of relapsed or refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients remains a major clinical challenge to date. We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase-III trial hypothesizing superior efficacy of rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and dexamethasone with bortezomib (R-HAD + B) versus without (R-HAD) in r/r MCL ineligible for or relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), secondary endpoints included response rates, progression free survival, overall survival, and safety. In total, 128 of 175 planned patients were randomized to R-HAD + B (n = 64) or R-HAD (n = 64). Median TTF was 12 vs. 2.6 months (p = 0.045, MIPI-adjusted HR 0.69; 95%CI 0.47-1.02). Overall and complete response rates were 63 vs. 45% (p = 0.049) and 42 vs. 19% (p = 0.0062). A significant treatment effect was seen in the subgroup of patients >65 years (aHR 0.48, 0.29-0.79) and without previous ASCT (aHR 0.52, 0.28-0.96). Toxicity was mostly hematological and attributable to the chemotherapeutic backbone. Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and lymphocytopenia were more common in R-HAD + B without differences in severe infections between both arms. Bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy can be effective in r/r MCL and should be evaluated further as a therapeutic option, especially if therapy with BTK inhibitors is not an option. Trial registration: NCT01449344.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Fischer
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Linmiao Jiang
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Internal Medicine, St. Josef Hospital, Essen-Werden, Germany
| | - Christian Schmidt
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Krimo Bouabdallah
- Department of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital of Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Philippe Solal-Celigny
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, Bld Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint-Herblain, Cedex, France
| | - Christian W Scholz
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pierre Feugier
- Service d'Hématologie et Medecine Interne, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre, France
| | - Maike de Wit
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralf Ulrich Trappe
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany
| | - Michael Hallek
- Department I for Internal Medicine and Centre of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department for Hematology, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria-Hilf Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Martin Hoffmann
- Medizinische Klinik A, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | | | - Margaret Macro
- Hematology Department, University Hospital, Caen, France
| | - Jochen Greiner
- Department. of Internal Medicine, Diakonie-Hospital Stuttgart, 70176, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | | | - Eric Durot
- CHU Reims, Hématologie Clinique, F-51100, Reims, France
| | - Charles Foussard
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier, 49100, Angers, France
| | | | - Oliver Weigert
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christiane Pott
- Department of Internal Medicine II: Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Wolfram Klapper
- Hematopathology Section, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Unterhalt
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Hoster
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vincent Ribrag
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, DITEP, INSERM U1170, Villejuif, France
| | - Martin Dreyling
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stahler A, Kind AJ, Sers C, Mamlouk S, Müller L, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Sommerhäuser G, Kasper S, Hoppe B, Kurreck A, Held S, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Negative Hyperselection of Resistance Mutations for Panitumumab Maintenance in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PanaMa Phase II Trial, AIO KRK 0212). Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1256-1263. [PMID: 38289994 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated additional mutations in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of added panitumumab to a 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid (FU/FA) maintenance as pre-specified analysis of the randomized PanaMa trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Mutations (MUT) were identified using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS; Illumina Cancer Hotspot Panel v2) and IHC. RAS/BRAF V600E/PIK3CA/AKT1/ALK1/ERBB2/PTEN MUT and HER2/neu overexpressions were negatively hyperselected and correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since start of maintenance treatment, and objective response rates (ORR). Univariate/multivariate Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS 202 of 248 patients (81.5%) of the full analysis set (FAS) had available NGS data: hyperselection WT, 162 (80.2%); MUT, 40 (19.8%). From start of maintenance therapy, hyperselection WT tumors were associated with longer median PFS as compared with hyperselection MUT mCRC (7.5 vs. 5.4 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.07; P = 0.11), OS (28.7 vs. 22.2 months; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.77; P = 0.001), and higher ORR (35.8% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.26). The addition of panitumumab to maintenance was associated with significant benefit in hyperselection WT tumors for PFS (9.2 vs. 6.0 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93; P = 0.02) and numerically also for OS (36.9 vs. 24.9 months; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.36; P = 0.50), but not in hyperselection MUT tumors. Hyperselection status interacted with maintenance treatment arms in terms of PFS (P = 0.06) and OS (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Extended molecular profiling beyond RAS may have the potential to improve the patient selection for anti-EGFR containing maintenance regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas J Kind
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Soulafa Mamlouk
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beeke Hoppe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site München, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sommerhäuser G, Karthaus M, Kurreck A, Ballhausen A, Meyer-Knees JW, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Mueller L, Koenig AO, Weikersthal LFV, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Stahler A, Heinemann V, Held S, Alig AHS, Kasper-Virchow S, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Prognostic and predictive impact of metastatic organ involvement on maintenance therapy in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Subgroup analysis of patients treated within the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212). Int J Cancer 2024; 154:863-872. [PMID: 37840339 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Despite molecular selection, patients (pts) with RAS wildtype mCRC represent a heterogeneous population including diversity in metastatic spread. We investigated metastatic patterns for their prognostic and predictive impact on maintenance therapy with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid ± panitumumab. The study population was stratified according to (1) number of involved metastatic sites (single vs multiple organ metastasis), liver-limited disease vs (2) liver metastasis plus one additional site, and (3) vs liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions were used to correlate efficacy endpoints. Single organ metastasis was observed in 133 pts (53.6%) with 102 pts (41.1%) presenting with liver-limited disease, while multiple organ metastases were reported in 114 pts (46.0). Multiple compared to single organ metastases were associated with less favorable PFS (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P = .004) and OS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.98-1.93; P = .068) of maintenance therapy. While metastatic spread involving one additional extrahepatic site was not associated with clearly impaired survival compared to liver-limited disease, pts with liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites demonstrated less favorable PFS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.30-2.83; P < .001), and OS (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.51-3.76; P < .001) of maintenance therapy. Pmab-containing maintenance therapy appeared active in both pts with multiple (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .006) as well as to a lesser numerical extent in pts with single organ metastasis (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .332; Interaction P = .183). These data may support clinical decisions when EGFR-based maintenance therapy is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Klinikum Neuperlach/Klinikum Harlaching, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexej Ballhausen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna W Meyer-Knees
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Stade, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Alexander O Koenig
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology Goettingen, University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumuenster, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU Klinikum, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Annabel H S Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper-Virchow
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mai EK, Hielscher T, Bertsch U, Salwender HJ, Zweegman S, Raab MS, Munder M, Pantani L, Mancuso K, Brossart P, Beksac M, Blau IW, Dürig J, Besemer B, Fenk R, Reimer P, van der Holt B, Hänel M, von Metzler I, Graeven U, Müller-Tidow C, Boccadoro M, Scheid C, Dimopoulos MA, Hillengass J, Weisel KC, Cavo M, Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H. Predictors of early morbidity and mortality in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: data from five randomized, controlled, phase III trials in 3700 patients. Leukemia 2024; 38:640-647. [PMID: 38062124 PMCID: PMC10912032 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Early morbidity and mortality affect patient outcomes in multiple myeloma. Thus, we dissected the incidence and causes of morbidity/mortality during induction therapy (IT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and developed/validated a predictive risk score. We evaluated 3700 transplant-eligible NDMM patients treated in 2005-2020 with novel agent-based triplet/quadruplet IT. Primary endpoints were severe infections, death, or a combination of both. Patients were divided in a training (n = 1333) and three validation cohorts (n = 2367). During IT, 11.8%, 1.8%, and 12.5% of patients in the training cohort experienced severe infections, death, or both, respectively. Four major, baseline risk factors for severe infection/death were identified: low platelet count (<150/nL), ISS III, higher WHO performance status (>1), and age (>60 years). A risk score (1 risk factor=1 point) stratified patients in low (39.5%; 0 points), intermediate (41.9%; 1 point), and high (18.6%; ≥2 points) risk. The risk for severe infection/death increased from 7.7% vs. 11.5% vs. 23.3% in the low- vs. intermediate- vs. high-risk groups (p < 0.001). The risk score was independently validated in three trials incorporating quadruplet IT with an anti-CD38 antibody. Our analyses established a robust and easy-to-use score to identify NDMM patients at risk of severe infection/death, covering the latest quadruplet induction therapies. Trial registrations: HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4: EudraCT No. 2004-000944-26. GMMG-MM5: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16. GMMG-HD6: NCT02495922. EMN02/HOVON-95: NCT01208766. GMMG-HD7: NCT03617731.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias K Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans J Salwender
- Tumorzentrum Asklepios Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lucia Pantani
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Katia Mancuso
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor W Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roland Fenk
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Reimer
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Essen-Werden, Essen, Germany
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Ivana von Metzler
- Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Hospital Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mai EK, Goldschmid H, Miah K, Bertsch U, Besemer B, Hänel M, Krzykalla J, Fenk R, Schlenzka J, Munder M, Dürig J, Blau IW, Huhn S, Hose D, Jauch A, Kunz C, Mann C, Weinhold N, Scheid C, Schroers R, von Metzler I, Schieferdecker A, Thomalla J, Reimer P, Mahlberg R, Graeven U, Kremers S, Martens UM, Kunz C, Hensel M, Benner A, Seidel-Glätzer A, Weisel KC, Raab MS, Salwender HJ. Elotuzumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GMMG-HD6): results from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2024; 11:e101-e113. [PMID: 38302221 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00366-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this trial was to investigate the addition of the anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) in induction and consolidation therapy as well as to lenalidomide maintenance treatment in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS GMMG-HD6 was a phase 3, randomised trial conducted at 43 main trial sites and 26 associated trial sites throughout Germany. Adult patients (aged 18-70 years) with previously untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma, and a WHO performance status of 0-3, with 3 being allowed only if caused by myeloma disease and not by comorbid conditions, were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to four treatment groups. Induction therapy consisted of four 21-day cycles of RVd (lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-14; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11]; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 15 for cycles 1-2) or, RVd induction plus elotuzumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 for cycles 1-2, and on days 1 and 11 for cycles 3-4; E-RVd). Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation was followed by two 21-day cycles of either RVd consolidation (lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-14; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16) or elotuzumab plus RVd consolidation (with elotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15) followed by maintenance with either lenalidomide (10 mg orally on days 1-28 for cycles 1-3; thereafter, up to 15 mg orally on days 1-28; RVd/R or E-RVd/R group) or lenalidomide plus elotuzumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 for cycles 1-6, and on day 1 for cycles 7-26; RVd/E-R or E-RVd/E-R group) for 2 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of trial medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02495922, and is completed. FINDINGS Between June 29, 2015, and on Sept 11, 2017, 564 patients were included in the trial. The modified ITT population comprised 559 (243 [43%] females and 316 [57%] males) patients and the safety population 555 patients. After a median follow-up of 49·8 months (IQR 43·7-55·5), there was no difference in progression-free survival between the four treatment groups (adjusted log-rank p value, p=0·86), and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 69% (95% CI 61-77), 69% (61-76), 66% (58-74), and 67% (59-75) for patients treated with RVd/R, RVd/E-R, E-RVd/R, and E-RVd/E-R, respectively. Infections (grade 3 or worse) were the most frequently observed adverse event in all treatment groups (28 [20%] of 137 for RVd/R; 32 [23%] of 138 for RVd/E-R; 35 [25%] of 138 for E-RVd/R; and 48 [34%] of 142 for E-RVd/E-R). Serious adverse events (grade 3 or worse) were observed in 68 (48%) of 142 participants in the E-RVd/E-R group, 53 (39%) of 137 in the RVd/R, 53 (38%) of 138 in the RVd/E-R, and 50 (36%) of 138 in the E-RVd/R (36%) group. There were nine treatment-related deaths during the study. Two deaths (one sepsis and one toxic colitis) in the RVd/R group were considered lenalidomide-related. One death in the RVd/E-R group due to meningoencephalitis was considered lenalidomide and elotuzumab-related. Four deaths (one pulmonary embolism, one septic shock, one atypical pneumonia, and one cardiovascular failure) in the E-RVd/R group and two deaths (one sepsis and one pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis) in the E-RVd/E-R group were considered related to lenalidomide or elotuzumab, or both. INTERPRETATION Addition of elotuzumab to RVd induction or consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma did not provide clinical benefit. Elotuzumab-containing therapies might be reserved for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. FUNDING Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene and Chugai.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias K Mai
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmid
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre for Tumour Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kaya Miah
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre for Tumour Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinic Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Julia Krzykalla
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Fenk
- Department of Haematology, Oncology, and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jana Schlenzka
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Department for Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Igor W Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefanie Huhn
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Hose
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Kunz
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Mann
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Ivana von Metzler
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Aneta Schieferdecker
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Clinic for Haematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Rolf Mahlberg
- Internal Medicine I, Hospital Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen, Trier, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Medical Clinic I, Hospital Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Uwe M Martens
- Haematology, Oncology, Palliative Care, SLK Clinic Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Christian Kunz
- Haematology and Oncology, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | | | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans J Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg Altona and St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leypoldt LB, Tichy D, Besemer B, Hänel M, Raab MS, Mann C, Munder M, Reinhardt HC, Nogai A, Görner M, Ko YD, de Wit M, Salwender H, Scheid C, Graeven U, Peceny R, Staib P, Dieing A, Einsele H, Jauch A, Hundemer M, Zago M, Požek E, Benner A, Bokemeyer C, Goldschmidt H, Weisel KC. Isatuximab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of High-Risk Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:26-37. [PMID: 37753960 PMCID: PMC10730063 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The GMMG-CONCEPT trial investigated isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in transplant-eligible (TE) and transplant-noneligible (TNE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with exclusively high-risk disease for whom prospective trials are limited, aiming to induce minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. METHODS This academic, investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase II trial enrolled patients with high-risk NDMM (HRNDMM) defined by mandatory International Staging System stage II/III combined with del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), or more than three 1q21 copies as high-risk cytogenetic aberrations (HRCAs). Patients received Isa-KRd induction/consolidation and Isa-KR maintenance. TE patients received high-dose melphalan. TNE patients received two additional Isa-KRd cycles postinduction. This prespecified interim analysis (IA) reports the primary end point, MRD negativity (<10-5, next-generation flow), at the end of consolidation. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Among 125 patients with HRNDMM (TE-intention-to-treat [ITT]-IA, 99; TNE-ITT, 26) of the IA population for the primary end point, the median age was 58 (TE-ITT-IA) and 74 (TNE-ITT) years. Del17p was the most common HRCA (TE, 44.4%; TNE, 42.3%); about one third of evaluable TE/TNE patients presented two or more HRCAs, respectively. The trial met its primary end point with MRD negativity rates after consolidation of 67.7% (TE) and 54.2% (TNE) of patients. Eighty-one of 99 TE-ITT-IA patients reached MRD negativity at any time point (81.8%). MRD negativity was sustained for ≥1 year in 62.6% of patients. With a median follow-up of 44 (TE) and 33 (TNE) months, median PFS was not reached in either arm. CONCLUSION Isa-KRd effectively induces high rates of sustainable MRD negativity in the difficult-to-treat HRNDMM population, regardless of transplant status, translating into a median PFS that was not yet reached after 44/33 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa B. Leypoldt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation With Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diana Tichy
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Marc S. Raab
- Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Mann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hans Christian Reinhardt
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), Essen, Germany
| | - Axel Nogai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Görner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Johanniter Krankenhaus Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rudolf Peceny
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Peter Staib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, St Antonius Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Annette Dieing
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hundemer
- Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manola Zago
- Center for Clinical Trials, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ema Požek
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation With Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Internal Medicine V, GMMG-Studygroup at University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja C. Weisel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation With Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wennmann M, Ming W, Bauer F, Chmelik J, Klein A, Uhlenbrock C, Grözinger M, Kahl KC, Nonnenmacher T, Debic M, Hielscher T, Thierjung H, Rotkopf LT, Stanczyk N, Sauer S, Jauch A, Götz M, Kurz FT, Schlamp K, Horger M, Afat S, Besemer B, Hoffmann M, Hoffend J, Kraemer D, Graeven U, Ringelstein A, Bonekamp D, Kleesiek J, Floca RO, Hillengass J, Mai EK, Weinhold N, Weber TF, Goldschmidt H, Schlemmer HP, Maier-Hein K, Delorme S, Neher P. Prediction of Bone Marrow Biopsy Results From MRI in Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Deep Learning and Radiomics. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:754-765. [PMID: 37222527 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In multiple myeloma and its precursor stages, plasma cell infiltration (PCI) and cytogenetic aberrations are important for staging, risk stratification, and response assessment. However, invasive bone marrow (BM) biopsies cannot be performed frequently and multifocally to assess the spatially heterogenous tumor tissue. Therefore, the goal of this study was to establish an automated framework to predict local BM biopsy results from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective multicentric study used data from center 1 for algorithm training and internal testing, and data from center 2 to 8 for external testing. An nnU-Net was trained for automated segmentation of pelvic BM from T1-weighted whole-body MRI. Radiomics features were extracted from these segmentations, and random forest models were trained to predict PCI and the presence or absence of cytogenetic aberrations. Pearson correlation coefficient and the area under the receiver operating characteristic were used to evaluate the prediction performance for PCI and cytogenetic aberrations, respectively. RESULTS A total of 672 MRIs from 512 patients (median age, 61 years; interquartile range, 53-67 years; 307 men) from 8 centers and 370 corresponding BM biopsies were included. The predicted PCI from the best model was significantly correlated ( P ≤ 0.01) to the actual PCI from biopsy in all internal and external test sets (internal test set: r = 0.71 [0.51, 0.83]; center 2, high-quality test set: r = 0.45 [0.12, 0.69]; center 2, other test set: r = 0.30 [0.07, 0.49]; multicenter test set: r = 0.57 [0.30, 0.76]). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic of the prediction models for the different cytogenetic aberrations ranged from 0.57 to 0.76 for the internal test set, but no model generalized well to all 3 external test sets. CONCLUSIONS The automated image analysis framework established in this study allows for noninvasive prediction of a surrogate parameter for PCI, which is significantly correlated to the actual PCI from BM biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Wennmann
- From the Divisions of Radiology (M.W., F.B, C.U., M.G., H.T., L.T.R., N.S., F.T.K., D.B., J.K., H.-K.S., S.D.), and Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (W.M., J.C., A.K., K.-C.K., M.G., R.O.F., K.M.-H., P.N.); State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China (W.M.); Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.B., C.U., N.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic (J.C.); Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg (T.N., M.D., T.F.W.); Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (T.H.); Department of Medicine V, Multiple Myeloma Section (S.S., E.K.M., N.W., H.G.), and Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg (A.J.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Experimental Radiology Section, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm (M.G.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thorax Clinic at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg (K.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (M.H., S.A.), and Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen (B.B.); Medical Clinic A (M.H.), and Department for Radiology, Hospital of Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany (J.H.); Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, St Josefs Hospital Hagen, Hagen (D.K.); Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology (U.G.), and Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Mönchengladbach (A.R.); Institute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen (J.K.); Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (R.O.F., K.M.-H.); Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany (R.O.F.); Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY (J.H.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (H.G., H.-P.S., K.M.-H., P.N.); German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (P.N.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heinrich K, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Mueller L, König AO, von Weikersthal LF, Caca K, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Alig AHS, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Sommerhäuser G, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Impact of sex on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroup analysis of the PanaMa-study (AIO-KRK-0212). ESMO Open 2023; 8:101568. [PMID: 37441876 PMCID: PMC10507735 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are usually conducted irrespective of sex. Sex-associated differences relating to safety and efficacy in the treatment of mCRC, however, are gaining interest. METHODS PanaMa investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) versus FU/FA alone after induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. In this post hoc analysis, the study population was stratified for sex. Evaluated efficacy endpoints during maintenance treatment were progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint of the trial), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate during maintenance therapy. Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events during maintenance therapy. RESULTS In total, 165 male and 83 female patients were randomized and treated. Male and female patients showed numerically better objective response rates with Pmab, without reaching statistical significance. Male patients derived a significant benefit from the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with regard to PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.88; P = 0.006] that was not observed in female patients (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53-1.35; P = 0.491). The better PFS for male patients treated with Pmab did not translate into improved OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.55-1.30; P = 0.452). Female patients showed numerically improved OS when treated with Pmab. There was no difference in the total of grade ≥3 adverse events during maintenance regarding sex (P = 0.791). Female patients, however, had a higher rate of any grade nausea, diarrhea and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS In the PanaMa trial, the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC with FU/FA improved the outcome in terms of the primary endpoint (PFS) particularly in male patients. Female patients did not show the same benefit while experiencing higher rates of adverse events. Our results support the development of sex-specific protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich. https://twitter.com/heinrich_kat
| | - M Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich
| | | | - U Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Moenchengladbach
| | | | - A O König
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medicine Göttingen, Goettingen
| | | | - K Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg
| | | | - E Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg; University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg
| | - S Haas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumünster
| | - A H S Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - A Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - A Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen
| | - G Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich
| | - S Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - T Trarbach
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn; Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ballhausen A, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, König AO, von Weikersthal LF, Sommerhäuser G, Alig AHS, Goekkurt E, Meyer-Knees JW, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Kasper S, Heinrich K, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Health-related quality of life in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without panitumumab as maintenance therapy: a prespecified secondary analysis of the PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212) trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112955. [PMID: 37454537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PanaMa trial demonstrated significant benefit in progression-free survival with the addition of panitumumab (Pmab) to fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) as maintenance therapy following first-line induction therapy with FOLFOX/Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) analyses from the PanaMa trial. METHODS HRQOL outcomes were evaluated using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at every cycle of therapy until disease progression/death. HRQOL outcomes were mean and individual changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 from baselines (before induction therapy and before maintenance therapy) to each cycle of treatment. Comparative analyses were performed by randomisation status and treatment arm for induction- and maintenance-therapy, respectively. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01991873). RESULTS At least one HRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 349/377 (93%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 237/248 (96%) patients who were randomised and received maintenance therapy. During induction therapy, most HRQOL dimensions remained stable or showed improvement, while appetite loss and diarrhoea significantly deteriorated. During maintenance therapy, HRQOL dimensions remained stable, while those that deteriorated during induction therapy showed significant improvement, without significant differences between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION Maintenance therapy improves HRQOL dimensions that initially deteriorated during induction therapy while stabilising HRQOL in other dimensions. The addition of Pmab to FU/FA as maintenance therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs progression-free survival without negative impact on HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexej Ballhausen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, BV, Germany
| | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Stade, NI, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Mönchengladbach, NW, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Otto König
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, NI, Germany
| | | | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, HH, Germany
| | - Johanna Wanda Meyer-Knees
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Kasper
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, NW, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, BY, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, BY, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, BW, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, BW, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, NW, Germany; Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, NI, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stahler A, Hoppe B, Na IK, Keilholz L, Müller L, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goekkurt E, Kasper S, Kind AJ, Kurreck A, Alig AHS, Held S, Reinacher-Schick A, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Consensus Molecular Subtypes as Biomarkers of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Maintenance Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PanaMa, AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2975-2987. [PMID: 37018649 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) were evaluated as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) with or without panitumumab (Pmab) after Pmab + mFOLFOX6 induction within the randomized phase II PanaMa trial. METHODS CMSs were determined in the safety set (ie, patients that received induction) and full analysis set (FAS; ie, randomly assigned patients who received maintenance) and correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since the start of induction or maintenance treatment and objective response rates (ORRs). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI were calculated by univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 377 patients of the safety set, 296 (78.5%) had available CMS data: CMS1/2/3/4: 29 (9.8%)/122 (41.2%)/33 (11.2%)/112 (37.8%) and unclassifiable: 17 (5.7%). The CMSs were prognostic biomarkers in terms of PFS (P < .0001), OS (P < .0001), and ORR (P = .02) since the start of induction treatment. In FAS patients (n = 196), with CMS2/4 tumors, the addition of Pmab to FU/FA maintenance therapy was associated with longer PFS (CMS2: HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.95], P = .03; CMS4: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.38 to 1.03], P = .07) and OS (CMS2: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.52], P = .66; CMS4: HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.96], P = .04). The CMS interacted significantly with treatment in terms of PFS (CMS2 v CMS1/3: P = .02; CMS4 v CMS1/3: P = .03) and OS (CMS2 v CMS1/3: P = .03; CMS4 v CMS1/3: P < .001). CONCLUSION The CMS had a prognostic impact on PFS, OS, and ORR in RAS wild-type mCRC. In PanaMa, Pmab + FU/FA maintenance was associated with beneficial outcomes in CMS2/4, whereas no benefit was observed in CMS1/3 tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beeke Hoppe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Il-Kang Na
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, ECRC Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Keilholz
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Jay Kind
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Horst
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ballhausen A, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Mueller L, Koenig A, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Sommerhäuser G, Alig AHS, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Reinacher-Schick AC, Kasper S, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Health-related quality of life in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without panitumumab as maintenance therapy: An analysis of the Panama trial (AIO KRK0212). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
51 Background: The PANAMA study demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with the addition of panitumumab (Pmab) to fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) as maintenance therapy following first-line induction therapy with FOLFOX/Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. We report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) analyses of the PANAMA study. Methods: HRQOL was assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at every cycle of therapy until disease progression. All patients who received at least one dose of induction therapy and completed at least one HRQOL assessment were included into the analysis. HRQOL outcomes were mean changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 from baseline (prior to cycle 1 of induction therapy) to each cycle of treatment (both induction and maintenance therapy). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991873). Results: In total, 349/377 (93%) of the induction and 237/248 pts (96%) of the maintenance group completed at least one HRQOL assessment and were included in the HRQOL analysis population. There were no significant differences in any of the EORTC QLQ-C30 items between both treatment arms before induction therapy and at randomization. From baseline to cycle 6 of induction therapy there was significant improvement in mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QOL, functioning (except for cognitive functioning) and symptom (except for nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, appetite loss, constipation, and financial difficulties) scores in the randomized population. During maintenance therapy, no significant differences between FU/FA plus Pmab and FU/FA alone were observed. In both arms of the trial, GHS/QOL scores were maintained or trended to improve from baseline (start of induction therapy) to cycle 10 of maintenance therapy (FU/FA plus Pmab: mean difference 9.48 [95% CI 1.96-17.00]; p=0.014); FU/FA arm (mean difference 6.52 [95% CI –1.9-14.95]; p=0.128). Conclusions: Using the established EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment, the addition of Pmab to FU/FA as maintenance therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer did not impair the HRQOL endpoints analyzed compared to FU/FA alone. These results, along with previously reported improvement in PFS, may support clinical decision-making concerning maintenance treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT01991873 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexej Ballhausen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Stade, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Koenig
- University Medical Center Goettingen, Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, and Endocrinology, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eray Goekkurt
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf (HOPE), Facharztzentrum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Neumuenster, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anke C. Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Karthaus M, Sommerhäuser G, Kurreck A, Beck A, Fehrenbach U, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, Koenig A, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Stahler A, Heinemann V, Held S, Alig AHS, Kasper S, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Prognostic and predictive impact of metastatic organ involvement on maintenance therapy in advanced metastatic CRC: Analysis of patients treated within the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
127 Background: Despite molecular selection, patients with RAS wildtype mCRC represent a heterogeneous population, including different metastatic patterns and number of organs involved. We investigated metastatic patterns for their prognostic and predictive impact on maintenance therapy with (FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone) in patients treated within the PanaMa trial. Methods: The study population was stratified according to number of organs involved and also to different patterns including liver metastases alone or in combination with additional organs. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions were used to correlate efficacy endpoints (i.e. progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of maintenance therapy) in the aforementioned populations. Results: Of 248 patients (pts) receiving maintenance therapy, 133 pts had a one-metastatic site disease (53.6%). Of those, 102 pts had liver-only metastases. Furthermore, liver metastases plus one additional involved organ was observed in 61/248 patients (24.6%), and liver metastases plus two or more organs in 40/248 patients (16.1%). In general, one organ disease was associated with favourable PFS of maintenance therapy compared to patients with ≥2 organs involved (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.88; P = 0.004). A predictive impact of disease spread in terms of pmab-containing maintenance therapy was present for the PFS of maintenance therapy in patients with ≥ 2 organ disease (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.86; P = 0.006) unlike in patients with only one-organ disease (HR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = 0.332) and also specifically in patients with a 2-organ disease including the liver (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–0.99; P = 0.046). Conclusions: Consistent with previous reports, organ spread has prognostic impact in mCRC. The efficacy of more intensive maintenance therapy (including pmab and 5-FU/FA) is predominantly seen in patients with more than one organ involved in the metastatic spread, while less striking effects were seen in patients with only one organ disease. These data may support clinical decisions when EGFR-based maintenance therapy is considered. Clinical trial information: NCT01991873 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/ Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, Germany
| | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Stade, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Lothar Müller
- Studienzentrum UnterEms und Onkologie UnterEms, Leer, Germany
| | | | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Hematology Oncology Practice Eppendorf (HOPE) and University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Medical Department, Divison of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universtiaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Department of Hematology, and Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Wesselmann S, Bruns J, Nettekoven G, Tillack A, Follmann M, Arndt V, Graeven U, Hartz T, Illmer T, Inwald EC, Kaiser T, Nothacker M, Ortmann O, Schmidt S, Schmitt J, Zeissig SR, Seufferlein T. [Further Development and Interoperability in Oncological Care Structures, Quality Control and Research]. Gesundheitswesen 2022. [PMID: 36328158 DOI: 10.1055/a-1926-6818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
How can we improve the interoperability of medical guidelines and the implementation and measurement of outcomes in medical health care for cancer patients as well as for care providers? This is the aim of the working group "Quality and Cross-linking". The following publication gives an overview of the targets reached in the development of guidelines together with quality indicators and documentation in cancer registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e. V. (ADT).,Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg.,Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e.V. und ZeGV
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Illmer
- Berufsverband der Niedergelassenen Hämatologen und Onkologen in Deutschland (BNHO)
| | - Elisabeth C Inwald
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e. V. (ADT).,Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg.,Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Universität Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef
| | - Thomas Kaiser
- Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF)
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e. V. (ADT).,Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg.,Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V.,Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Universität Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goldschmidt H, Mai EK, Bertsch U, Fenk R, Nievergall E, Tichy D, Besemer B, Dürig J, Schroers R, von Metzler I, Hänel M, Mann C, Asemissen AM, Heilmeier B, Weinhold N, Huhn S, Kriegsmann K, Luntz SP, Holderried TAW, Trautmann-Grill K, Gezer D, Klaiber-Hakimi M, Müller M, Khandanpour C, Knauf W, Scheid C, Munder M, Geer T, Riesenberg H, Thomalla J, Hoffmann M, Raab MS, Salwender HJ, Weisel KC, Asemissen AM, Behringer J, Bernhard H, Bernhardt C, Bertsch U, Besemer B, Blau IW, Bolling C, Debatin D, Dingeldein G, Dürig J, Fenk R, Ferstl B, Fest C, Fronhoffs S, Fuhrmann S, Gaska T, Geer T, Gezer D, Goldschmidt H, Görner M, Graeven U, Grassinger J, Hänel M, Heilmeier B, Heinsch M, Held G, Hoffmann M, Holderried TAW, Hopfer O, Huhn S, Immenschuh P, Kaddu-Mulindwa D, Khandanpour C, Klaiber-Hakimi M, Klausmann M, Klein S, Knauf W, Ko YD, Köchling G, Koenigsmann M, Kostrewa P, Kraemer DM, Kremers S, Kriegsmann K, Kropff M, La Rosée P, Luntz SP, Mahlberg R, Mai EK, Mann C, Martens U, von Metzler I, Müller M, Munder M, Neise M, Nievergall E, Nückel H, Pönisch W, Procaccianti M, Raab MS, Rafiyan MR, Reimer P, Riecke A, Riesenberg H, Rummel M, Runde V, Salwender HJ, Schaich M, Scheid C, Schmidt-Hieber M, Schmitt S, Schöndube D, Schroers R, Schwarzer A, Staib P, Steiniger H, Sturmberg D, Thomalla J, Tichy D, Tischler HJ, Trautmann-Grill K, Trummer A, Tschechne B, Verbeek W, Weinhold N, Weisel KC, Whitlock B, de Wit M, Zaiß M, Ziske C. Addition of isatuximab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (GMMG-HD7): part 1 of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Haematology 2022; 9:e810-e821. [DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00263-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
16
|
Modest D, Heinemann V, Schütt P, Angermeier S, Haberkorn M, Waidmann O, Graeven U, Wille K, Kunzmann V, Henze L, Constantin C, De Wit M, Denzlinger C, Kurreck A, Alig A, Stahler A, Pelzer U, Stintzing S, Oettle H. 1301P Sequential therapy of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel with either 5-FU/folinic acid (5FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by 5FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (OFF) or the reverse sequence: The PANTHEON trial (AIO PAK 0116). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
17
|
Stahler A, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kaiser F, Decker T, Held S, Graeven U, Schwaner I, Denzlinger C, Schenk M, Kurreck A, Heinrich K, Gießen-Jung C, Neumann J, Kirchner T, Jung A, Stintzing S, Heinemann V. First-line fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab followed by irinotecan-escalation versus initial fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - Final survival and per-protocol analysis of the randomised XELAVIRI trial (AIO KRK 0110). Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:194-203. [PMID: 35940054 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomised open-label phase III XELAVIRI trial failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the sequential application of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab followed by additional irinotecan at first progression (Arm A) versus initial combination of all agents (Arm B) for untreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the initial analysis of time-to-failure-of-strategy (TFS, 90% confidence boundary of 0.8). Here, we evaluate efficacy in the full analysis set (FAS), the per-protocol set, in addition to age-related and molecular subgroups. METHODS Median TFS, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression models assessed hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) (TFS: 90%; OS, PFS: 95%). RESULTS Of 421 patients, 390 (92.6%), 391 (92.9%) and 357 (84.8%) events for TFS, OS and PFS were observed in the FAS with a median follow-up of 54.2 months (Arm A) versus 52.9 months (Arm B). Non-inferiority of sequential treatment for TFS was missed in the FAS (HR 0.93; 90% CI, 0.79-1.10; P = 0.482) and not shown in the per-protocol set (HR 0.93; 90% CI, 0.75-1.13, P = 0.433). Formal non-inferiority for TFS was observed for patients older than 70 years (HR 1.06; 90% CI, 0.80-1.41; P = 0.670) and patients with RAS mutant tumours (HR 1.12; 90% CI, 0.87-1.43; P = 0.465). In RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours, combination treatment was significantly superior to sequential therapy in all end-points. CONCLUSIONS In the overall population, XELAVIRI just missed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of sequential compared to combination therapy for TFS. However, the non-inferiority of sequential treatment was observed in elderly patients and RAS mutant tumours. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration ID (clinicaltrials.gov) NCT01249638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ingo Schwaner
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Michael Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jens Neumann
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Raimondi A, Morano F, Trarbach T, Karthaus M, Lonardi S, Fruehauf S, Cremolini C, Graeven U, Bittoni A, Mueller L, Sartore Bianchi A, Aranda E, Boige V, Stintzing S, Di Bartolomeo M, Koenig A, Pietrantonio F, Modest D. SO-21 Optimal maintenance treatment strategy following an anti-EGFR-based first-line induction therapy in patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer: An individual patient data pooled analysis of clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
19
|
Heinrich K, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, Koenig A, von Weikersthal L, Caca K, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Alig AHS, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Reinacher-Schick AC, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Impact of age and gender on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Subgroup analysis of the PANAMA-study (AIO-KRK-0212). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3567 Background: Clinical trials in mCRC are usually conducted irrespective of gender and mostly also irrespective of age. However, gender- and age-associated differences relating to safety and efficacy in the treatment of mCRC are of presently moving into the focus of interest. We investigated the effect of gender and age on efficacy and safety in the PANAMA trial. Methods: PANAMA investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) versus FU/FA alone after first-line induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. In this post-hoc analysis, the study population was stratified for age (≤ 65 years versus > 65 years) and gender (male versus female). Evaluated efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) of maintenance therapy and objective response rate (ORR) during maintenance therapy. Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). Results: In total, 165 male and 83 female patients were randomized and treated. Male patients had a significant benefit from the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with regard to PFS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.88; p = 0.006) and demonstrated a strong trend towards better ORR during maintenance therapy (Odds ratio 1.92; 95%CI 1.02-3.70, p = 0.053). In female patients, no difference regarding PFS was seen between treatment arms (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53-1.35, p = 0.491), while a trend towards better ORR with Pmab (Odds ratio 2.50; 95% CI 0.99-6.25; p = 0.063) was observed. Gender had no significant impact on OS, nor did age categories affect survival endpoints. Adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurring during maintenance therapy were comparable between male and female patients (12.9% vs 13.5%; p = 0.791) and in different age categories (p = 0.393). Conclusions: In the Panama trial, addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with FU/FA improved outcome in RAS wild-type mCRC. This effect is irrespective of age and is pronounced in male patients. Our results support the relevance of gender in mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT01991873. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/ Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Lothar Müller
- Studienzentrum UnterEms und Onkologie UnterEms, Leer, Germany
| | - Alexander Koenig
- University Medical Center Goettingen, Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, and Endocrinology, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Karel Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Hematology Oncology Practice Eppendorf (HOPE) and University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Neumuenster, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anke C. Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universtätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoppe B, Modest DP, Keilholz L, Na IK, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Von Weikersthal LF, Goekkurt E, Reinacher-Schick AC, Kasper S, Kind AJ, Kurreck A, Held S, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Stahler A. Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of panitumumab (Pmab), fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) or FU/FA maintenance therapy following Pmab-FOLFOX induction in RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): PANAMA trial (AIO-KRK-0212). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3537 Background: Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4) of colorectal cancer were evaluated as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in the PANAMA trial. PANAMA compared maintenance therapy with panitumumab (Pmab) and fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) vs. FU/FA alone after Pmab-FOLFOX induction therapy in RAS wildtype mCRC. Methods: Gene expression was measured after mRNA isolation in 179 of 248 patients of the full analysis set. The analysis was conducted using a customized Nanostring PanCancer Progression Panel. The original CMS classifier was re-derived for Nanostring data using a multinomial regression analysis.Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since start of maintenance were estimated by Kaplan-Meier-method and Cox-regression, using the log rank test. Objective response rates (ORR) of maintenance therapy were compared by Chi-square-test. Results: Prevalence of CMS was: CMS1, n = 15 (8.4 %); CMS2, n = 82 (45.8 %); CMS3, n = 20 (11.2 %) and CMS4, n = 62 (34.6 %). A prognostic impact of CMS regardless of treatment was not evident for PFS (p = 0.245) and OS (p = 0.169), but for ORR (p = 0.022), with CMS1 and CMS3 being associated with unfavourable efficacy during maintenance therapy. Potential predictive effects of CMS were observed in patients with CMS2 and CMS4 tumours. In CMS2 and CMS4 tumours, ORR was significantly higher when treated with Pmab-FU/FA in maintenance therapy (CMS2: 56.5% vs 30.6%, p = 0.026; CMS4: 55.6% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.040). In patients with CMS2 mCRC, this translated into a significant effect on PFS (Hazard ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.38 – 0.99) p = 0.046 (Table). Conclusions: CMS have limited prognostic impact for pmab-based maintenance therapy. However, CMS2 and CMS4 are positively associated with Pmab efficacy during maintenance therapy in the PANAMA trial. Further trials are necessary to confirm these results. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beeke Hoppe
- Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Keilholz
- Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Il-Kang Na
- Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/ Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anke C. Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Jay Kind
- Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Charité Medizinische Universitaet Berlin, Institute for Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Charité Medizinische Universitaet Berlin, Institute for Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kurreck A, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Mueller L, Koenig A, von Weikersthal L, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Stahler A, Heinemann V, Held S, Alig AHS, Hoppe B, Kind AJ, Kasper S, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Predictive and prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on maintenance therapy with 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin plus panitumumab or 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin alone in RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer: Evaluation of the phase II PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3587 Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may reflect response to antitumor treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The predictive value of CEA has not yet been proven for subsequent maintenance therapy. This analysis aims to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of pre- and post-induction treatment CEA on maintenance with 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin (FU/FA) plus panitumumab (pmab) [arm A] or FU/FA alone [arm B] in RAS wildtype mCRC patients treated within the PanaMa trial. Methods: Patients with CEA measurements (pre- and post-induction therapy) were grouped as normal (both measurements ≤5 ug/l), stable (between +25% and -25%), decreasing (<-25%), and increasing (>+25%) CEA. Survival parameters (overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) from initiation of maintenance therapy) were expressed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank testing, and Cox regression. The objective response (OR) to maintenance therapy was analyzed by chi-square testing. Results: Out of 248 patients in the in the full analysis set, 245 patients were eligible for CEA analysis. Normal CEA occurred in 58 (23.7%), stable CEA in 16 (6.5%), decreasing CEA in 161 (65.7%), and increasing CEA in 10 (4.1%) patients. In the subgroup of decreasing CEA, there was a significant difference in the prediction of OR between both treatment arms with a better positive predictive value for the pmab-containing maintenance (44.0% vs. 27.5%, p=0.032). Increasing compared to decreasing CEA was associated with unfavourable survival outcome of maintenance irrespective of treatment arm (Table). Conclusions: CEA kinetics during induction therapy appears to have a predictive value for subsequent maintenance, notably pmab-based. Besides that, CEA levels had a significant impact on survival parameters of maintenance irrespective of the addition of pmab to FU/FA. This analysis is limited by the small number of patients in the subgroup of increasing CEA. Clinical trial information: NCT01991873. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Kurreck
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/ Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Stade, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Koenig
- University Medical Center Goettingen, Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, and Endocrinology, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Neumuenster, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Beeke Hoppe
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Jay Kind
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Department of Hematology, and Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Hospital of Wilhelmshaven, Department of Hematology, and Oncology, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kind AJ, Modest DP, Sers C, Mamlouk S, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Von Weikersthal LF, Goekkurt E, Reinacher-Schick AC, Kasper S, Kurreck A, Hoppe B, Held S, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Stahler A. Negative hyperselection for mutations associated with anti-EGFR antibody resistance in RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Evaluation of the PANAMA trial (AIO-KRK-0212, maintenance therapy with 5-FU, folinic acid (FU/FA) with or without panitumumab). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3536 Background: We evaluated the prognostic and predictive impact of DNA mutations related to anti-EGFR antibody resistance in patients of the PANAMA trial, which compared Panitumumab (Pmab) and FU/FA versus FU/FA maintenance therapy after Pmab-FOLFOX induction therapy in RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC. Methods: Next generation panel sequencing was conducted on 201 of 248 tumors obtained prior to study inclusion from the full analysis set using the Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 on an Illumina MiSeq system. Hyperselection covered mutations of the following genes: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2, PTEN, AKT1, PIK3CA. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since start of maintenance were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression (log rank test). Objective response rates (ORR) of maintenance therapy were compared by Chi-square-test. Results: From 201 tumors, 41 (20.4 %) carried at least one mutation: KRAS: 7 (3.5%), BRAF: 23 (11.4%), PTEN: 4 (2.0%), AKT1: 2 (1.0%), PIK3CA: 12 (6.0%), with 6 tumors harboring co-occuring mutations. No mutations were found in NRAS and HER2. Negative hyperselection (wt for all genes) was associated with (numerically) favourable prognosis in terms of PFS (HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.55 – 1.12), p=0.184), OS (HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.40 – 0.95), p=0.028) and ORR (39.4% vs. 29.3%, p=0.279). The benefit of adding Pmab to FU/FA during maintenance was limited to the hyperselection wt subgroup, with significantly longer PFS (9.9 vs. 6.0 months, 0.64 (95% CI 0,46 – 0.90), p = 0.011), numerically longer OS and significantly higher ORR (49.4% vs 26.6%, p=0.009) compared to FU/FA (Table). Conclusions: Mutations related to resistance concerning anti-EGFR antibodies were detected in 41 of 201 (20.4%) of analysed tumors and associated with a worse prognosis compared to hyperselected wt tumors. Negative hyperselection may aid in the identification of patients with relevant benefit from maintenance therapy including Pmab. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Jay Kind
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universtätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universtätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Soulafa Mamlouk
- Institute of Pathology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/ Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anke C. Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Charité Medizinische Universitaet Berlin, Institute for Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Charité Medizinische Universitaet Berlin, Institute for Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité- Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin and Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kusch M, Labouvie H, Schiewer V, Talalaev N, Cwik JC, Bussmann S, Vaganian L, Gerlach AL, Dresen A, Cecon N, Salm S, Krieger T, Pfaff H, Lemmen C, Derendorf L, Stock S, Samel C, Hagemeier A, Hellmich M, Leicher B, Hültenschmidt G, Swoboda J, Haas P, Arning A, Göttel A, Schwickerath K, Graeven U, Houwaart S, Kerek-Bodden H, Krebs S, Muth C, Hecker C, Reiser M, Mauch C, Benner J, Schmidt G, Karlowsky C, Vimalanandan G, Matyschik L, Galonska L, Francke A, Osborne K, Nestle U, Bäumer M, Schmitz K, Wolf J, Hallek M. Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:543. [PMID: 35459202 PMCID: PMC9034572 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07782-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The annual incidence of new cancer cases has been increasing worldwide for many years, and is likely to continue to rise. In Germany, the number of new cancer cases is expected to increase by 20% until 2030. Half of all cancer patients experience significant emotional and psychosocial distress along the continuum of their disease, treatment, and aftercare, and also as long-term survivors. Consequently, in many countries, psycho-oncological programs have been developed to address this added burden at both the individual and population level. These programs promote the active engagement of patients in their cancer therapy, aftercare and survivorship planning and aim to improve the patients' quality of life. In Germany, the “new form of care isPO” (“nFC-isPO”; integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology/integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psycho-Onkologie) is currently being developed, implemented and evaluated. This approach strives to accomplish the goals devised in the National Cancer Plan by providing psycho-oncological care to all cancer patients according to their individual healthcare needs. The term “new form of care" is defined by the Innovation Fund (IF) of Germany's Federal Joint Committee as “a structured and legally binding cooperation between different professional groups and/or institutions in medical and non-medical care”. The nFC-isPO is part of the isPO project funded by the IF. It is implemented in four local cancer centres and is currently undergoing a continuous quality improvement process. As part of the isPO project the nFC-isPO is being evaluated by an independent institution: the Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Germany. The four-year isPO project was selected by the IF to be eligible for funding because it meets the requirements of the federal government's National Cancer Plan (NCP), in particular, the “further development of the oncological care structures and quality assurance" in the psycho-oncological domain. An independent evaluation is required by the IF to verify if the new form of care leads to an improvement in cross-sectoral care and to explore its potential for permanent integration into the German health care system. Methods The nFC-isPO consists of six components: a concept of care (C1), care pathways (C2), a psycho-oncological care network (C3), a care process organization plan (C4), an IT-supported documentation and assistance system (C5) and a quality management system (C6). The two components concept of care (C1) and care pathways (C2) represent the isPO clinical care program, according to which the individual cancer patients are offered psycho-oncological services within a period of 12 months after program enrolment following the diagnosis of cancer. The remaining components (C3-C6) represent the formal-administrative aspects of the nFC-isPO that are intended to meet the legally binding requirements of patient care in the German health care system. With the aim of systematic development of the nFC-isPO while at the same time enabling the external evaluators to examine its quality, effectiveness and efficiency under conditions of routine care, the project partners took into consideration approaches from translational psycho-oncology, practice-based health care research and program theory. In order to develop a structured, population-based isPO care program, reference was made to a specific program theory, to the stepped-care approach, and also to evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The basic version, nFC-isPO, was created over the first year after the start of the isPO project in October 2017, and has since been subject to a continuous quality improvement process. In 2019, the nFC-isPO was implemented at four local psycho-oncological care networks in the federal state North Rhine-Westphalia, in Germany. The legal basis of the implementation is a contract for "special care" with the German statutory health insurance funds according to state law (§ 140a SCB V; Social Code Book V for the statutory health insurance funds). Besides the accompanying external evaluation by the IMVR, the nFC-isPO is subjected to quarterly internal and cross-network quality assurance and improvement measures (internal evaluation) in order to ensure continuous quality improvement process. These quality management measures are developed and tested in the isPO project and are to be retained in order to ensure the sustainability of the quality of nFC-isPO for later dissemination into the German health care system. Discussion Demands on quality, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of in the German health care system are increasing, whereas financial resources are declining, especially for psychosocial services. At the same time, knowledge about evidence-based screening, assessment and intervention in cancer patients and about the provision of psychosocial oncological services is growing continuously. Due to the legal framework of the statutory health insurance in Germany, it has taken years to put sound psycho-oncological findings from research into practice. Ensuring the adequate and sustainable financing of a needs-oriented, psycho-oncological care approach for all newly diagnosed cancer patients, as required by the NCP, may still require many additional years. The aim of the isPO project is to develop a new form of psycho-oncological care for the individual and the population suffering from cancer, and to provide those responsible for German health policy with a sound basis for decision-making on the timely dissemination of psycho-oncological services in the German health care system. Trial registration The study was pre-registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de/DRKS00015326) under the following trial registration number: DRKS00015326; Date of registration: October 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kusch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Hildegard Labouvie
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vera Schiewer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalie Talalaev
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan C Cwik
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sonja Bussmann
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lusine Vaganian
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander L Gerlach
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antje Dresen
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalia Cecon
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sandra Salm
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Theresia Krieger
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Pfaff
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lisa Derendorf
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christina Samel
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Hagemeier
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Leicher
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Gregor Hültenschmidt
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jessica Swoboda
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Peter Haas
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Anna Arning
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Göttel
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Houwaart
- House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hedy Kerek-Bodden
- House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany, Bonn, Germany
| | - Steffen Krebs
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiana Muth
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Marcel Reiser
- PIOH Köln - Praxis Internistischer Onkologie Und Hämatologie, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jürgen Wolf
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Hallek
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kurreck A, Heinemann V, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kaiser F, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Graeven U, Heinrich K, Held S, Stahler A, Alig AHS, Jelas I, von Einem JC, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Modest DP. Response and Disease Dynamics in Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Bevacizumab-Based Sequential vs. Combination Chemotherapy—Analysis of the Phase 3 XELAVIRI Trial. Front Oncol 2022; 12:751453. [PMID: 35251955 PMCID: PMC8895369 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.751453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Early tumor shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR), and time to DpR represent exploratory endpoints that may serve as early efficacy parameters and predictors of long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We analyzed these endpoints in mCRC patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based sequential (initial fluoropyrimidines) versus combination (initial fluoropyrimidines plus irinotecan) chemotherapy within the phase 3 XELAVIRI trial. Methods DpR (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), ETS (≥20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), and time to DpR (study randomization to DpR image) were analyzed. We evaluated progression-free survival and overall survival with ETS as stratification parameter according to treatment arm, molecular subgroup, and sex. Results In 370 patients analyzed, a higher rate of ETS (60.9% vs. 43.5%; p = 0.001) and significantly greater DpR (-40.0% vs. -24.7%; p < 0.001) were observed in the initial combination therapy arm. The improvement was pronounced in RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors. ETS correlated with improved survival irrespective of treatment arm (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.012) and molecular subgroup (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p < 0.001). Male patients in contrast to female patients with ETS had survival benefit (PFS: p < 0.001, HR 0.532; OS: p < 0.001, HR 0.574 vs. PFS: p = 0.107; OS: p = 0.965). Conclusions Initial irinotecan-based combination therapy with bevacizumab improved ETS and DpR in mCRC patients with a particularly high irinotecan sensitivity of RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors. ETS seems to be a suitable prognostic marker for fluoropyrimidine- and bevacizumab-based combinations in mCRC. This finding was rather driven by male patients, potentially indicating that ETS might be less predictive of long-term outcome in an elderly, female population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Kurreck
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Charité Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, München, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael Schenk
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Clinic “Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg”, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Peuser
- Oncological Practice am Diakonissenhaus, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Claudio Denzlinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Oncology, Hematology, Palliative Care) Marienhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, München, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivan Jelas
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Charité Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jobst C. von Einem
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, München, Germany
| | - Dominik P. Modest
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology Charité Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Dominik P. Modest, ;
orcid.org/0000-0002-6853-0599
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Modest DP, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, König AO, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Caca K, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Jarosch A, Horst D, Reinacher-Schick A, Kasper S, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T. Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:72-82. [PMID: 34533973 PMCID: PMC8683209 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The randomized PANAMA trial investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) when added to maintenance therapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Following first-line induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, responding patients (stable disease or partial or complete remission) were randomly assigned (1:1, open-label) to maintenance treatment with either FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of progression-free survival (PFS, time from random assignment until progression or death) in favor of FU/FA plus Pmab with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, a power of 80%, and a significance level of 10%. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate of maintenance therapy, and toxicity. Survival end points were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test and Cox regressions. Dichotomous variables were compared by Fisher's exact test; odds ratios were indicated when appropriate. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991873). RESULTS Overall, 248 patients were randomly assigned and received maintenance therapy with either FU/FA plus Pmab (125 patients) or FU/FA alone (123 patients). At data cutoff, with 218 events (of 218 needed), PFS of maintenance therapy was significantly improved with FU/FA plus Pmab (8.8 months v 5.7 months; HR, 0.72; 80% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; P = .014). Overall survival (event rate 54%) numerically favored the FU/FA plus Pmab arm (28.7 months v 25.7 months; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.18; P = .32). Objective response rates were 40.8% in patients receiving FU/FA plus Pmab versus 26.0% in patients receiving FU/FA alone (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.36; P = .02). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event grade ≥ 3 event during maintenance therapy was skin rash (7.2%). CONCLUSION In RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, maintenance therapy with FU/FA plus Pmab induced a significantly superior PFS compared with FU/FA alone. If active maintenance therapy is aspired following induction therapy with FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, FU/FA plus Pmab appears to be the most favorable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Dominik Paul Modest, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumorimmunology (CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; e-mail:
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Alexander Otto König
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Karel Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany,University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumünster, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Swantje Held
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Charité Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Kasper
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Zentrum für Tumorbiologie und Integrative Medizin, Klinikum Wilhelmshaven, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Leypoldt LB, Besemer B, Asemissen AM, Hänel M, Blau IW, Görner M, Ko YD, Reinhardt HC, Staib P, Mann C, Lutz R, Munder M, Graeven U, Peceny R, Salwender H, Jauch A, Zago M, Benner A, Tichy D, Bokemeyer C, Goldschmidt H, Weisel KC. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in front-line treatment of high-risk multiple myeloma: interim analysis of the GMMG-CONCEPT trial. Leukemia 2021; 36:885-888. [PMID: 34732857 PMCID: PMC8885414 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01431-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa B Leypoldt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Pulmonology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Anne Marie Asemissen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Igor Wolfgang Blau
- Department of Internal Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Görner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Johanniter Krankenhaus Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hans Christian Reinhardt
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Staib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Christoph Mann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Raphael Lutz
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Maria Hilf Kliniken, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rudolf Peceny
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manola Zago
- Center for Clinical Trials, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Diana Tichy
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stahler A, Heinemann V, Schuster V, Heinrich K, Kurreck A, Gießen-Jung C, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kaiser F, Decker T, Held S, Graeven U, Schwaner I, Denzlinger C, Schenk M, Neumann J, Kirchner T, Jung A, Kumbrink J, Stintzing S, Modest DP. Consensus molecular subtypes in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with sequential versus combined fluoropyrimidine, bevacizumab and irinotecan (XELAVIRI trial). Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:71-80. [PMID: 34507244 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The XELAVIRI trial compared sequential (fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab; irinotecan (Iri) at progression) versus initial combination therapy (fluoropyrimidine, bevacizumab, Iri) of treatment-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the confirmatory analysis, the primary end-point (non-inferiority of sequential therapy regarding time to failure of strategy, TFS) was not met. Nevertheless, significant differences regarding treatment efficacy were observed according to RAS status. Here, we evaluate the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) as additional biomarkers for sequential versus combination therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Gene expression was measured using NanoString after mRNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour specimens. CMS were predicted using multinomial regression and correlated with updated data for TFS, overall (OS) and progression-free survival. RESULTS CMS were predicted in 337 of 421 (80.0%) patients (CMS1: 18.4%; CMS2: 51.6%; CMS3: 2.7%; CMS4: 27.3%). CMS2 together with RAS/BRAF wild-type status was identified as potential predictive marker of benefit from initial combination therapy for OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96, p = 0.036) and progression-free survival (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.29-0.79, p = 0.004) and also trending in TFS (HR 0.63, 90% CI 0.41-0.95, p = 0.066). In patients with RAS-mutated mCRC, CMS1 was associated with longer OS after initial combination therapy (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.95, p = 0.038). Interaction testing (two-sided) of CMS and RAS/BRAF status in favour of the combination treatment strategy was significant for OS (p = 0.012) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC, CMS2 may serve as an additional biomarker of benefit from the initial combination therapy, including Iri. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration ID (clinicaltrials.gov) NCT01249638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Veronika Schuster
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ingo Schwaner
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Michael Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jens Neumann
- Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Kumbrink
- LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gruenwald V, Graeven U, Ivanyi P, Dietz A, Hahn D, Hackenberg S, Kasper S, Fietkau R, Moulin JC, Pink D, Schaaf M, Klinghammer K. 912P Results of a randomized phase II study comparing pembrolizumab with methotrexate in elderly, frail or cisplatin-ineligible patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN) (ELDORANDO-AIO-KHT-0115). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
29
|
Kiani A, Roesch R, Wendtner CM, Kullmann F, Kubin T, Südhoff T, Augustin M, Schaich M, Müller‐Naendrup C, Illerhaus G, Hartmann F, Hebart H, Seggewiss‐Bernhardt R, Bentz M, Späth‐Schwalbe E, Reimer P, Kaiser U, Kapp M, Graeven U, Chemnitz J, Baesecke J, Lambertz H, Naumann R. Preinfection laboratory parameters may predict COVID-19 severity in tumor patients. Cancer Med 2021; 10:4424-4436. [PMID: 34121360 PMCID: PMC8267142 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to COVID-19, the course of which is highly variable and depends on numerous patient-specific risk factors. Patients with tumor diseases are considered to be more susceptible to severe COVID-19; however, they also represent a heterogeneous group of individuals with variable risk. Identifying specific risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 in patients with cancer is of great importance. METHODS Patients diagnosed with solid tumors or hematological malignancies and PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included into the multicentric ADHOK (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Hämatologen und Onkologen im Krankenhaus e.V.) coronavirus tumor registry. Detailed information about the patients' cancer disease, treatment, and laboratory parameters prior to infection, was collected retrospectively. The outcome of the SARS-CoV-2 infection was graded according to the WHO. RESULTS A total of 195 patients (68% with solid neoplasms and 32% with hematological malignancies) were included in the registry. Overall, the course of the SARS-CoV-2 infection varied greatly, as 69% of all patients were either asymptomatic or encountered a mild to moderate course, while 23% of the cohort died from COVID-19. In multivariable analysis, preinfection laboratory parameters (determined at least 10 days and a median of 21 days before the first documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection) significantly correlated with severe course of the disease. Out of these, the absolute neutrophil count prior to infection showed the strongest association with COVID-19-related death. CONCLUSION The course of COVID-19 in patients with tumor diseases is highly variable. Preinfection laboratory parameters may aid to identify patients at risk for severe COVID-19 at an early stage prior to infection with the virus. German Clinical Trials Register identification: DRKS00023012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kiani
- Medizinische Klinik IVKlinikum Bayreuth GmbHBayreuthGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN (CCC ER‐EMN)ErlangenGermany
| | | | - Clemens M. Wendtner
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Immunologie, Palliativmedizin, Infektiologie und TropenmedizinMünchen Klinik SchwabingMunchenGermany
| | | | - Thomas Kubin
- Klinik für Hämatologie & OnkologieKlinikum TraunsteinTraunsteinGermany
| | | | | | - Markus Schaich
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und PalliativmedizinRems‐Murr‐Klinikum WinnendenWinnendenGermany
| | - Clemens Müller‐Naendrup
- Onkologische und Hämatologische Schwerpunktpraxis im Medizinischen Versorgungszentrum IIOlpeGermany
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und PalliativmedizinKlinikum StuttgartStuttgartGermany
| | - Frank Hartmann
- Klinik für Hämatologie und OnkologieKlinikum LippeLemgoGermany
| | - Holger Hebart
- Zentrum für Innere MedizinStauferklinikumMutlangenGermany
| | | | - Martin Bentz
- Medizinische Klinik IIIStädtisches Klinikum KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
| | - Ernst Späth‐Schwalbe
- Klinik für Innere Medizin ‐ Hämatologie, Onkologie und PalliativmedizinVivantes Klinikum Berlin SpandauBerlinGermany
| | - Peter Reimer
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Internistische Onkologie & StammzelltransplantationEvangelisches Krankenhaus Essen‐WerdenEssenGermany
| | - Ulrich Kaiser
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und ImmunologieSt. Bernward Krankenhaus GmbHHildesheimGermany
| | - Markus Kapp
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Hämatologie und Internistische OnkologieSana Klinikum HofHofGermany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und GastroenterologieKliniken Maria Hilf GmbHMönchengladbachGermany
| | - Jens‐Marcus Chemnitz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin ‐ Hämatologie/Onkologie, PalliativmedizinEv. Stift St. MartinKoblenzGermany
| | - Jörg Baesecke
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, PalliativmedizinSt. Josefs‐Hospital CloppenburgCloppenburgGermany
| | - Helmut Lambertz
- Fachabteilung Onkologie, Hämatologie & PalliativmedizinKlinikum Garmisch‐PatenkirchenGarmisch‐PartenkirchenGermany
| | - Ralph Naumann
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Medizinische Onkologie und PalliativmedizinMarien Kliniken SiegenSiegenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hofheinz RD, Hegewisch-Becker S, Kunzmann V, Thuss-Patience P, Fuchs M, Homann N, Graeven U, Schulte N, Merx K, Pohl M, Held S, Keller R, Tannapfel A, Al-Batran SE. Trastuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel as perioperative treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: A phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie Gastric Cancer Study Group. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:1322-1331. [PMID: 34019698 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is a mainstay in the treatment of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGA). Trastuzumab improved survival when added to chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic EGA. We investigated the combination of trastuzumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment in patients with locally advanced EGA. A multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative FLOT (24-hours 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 , leucovorin 200 mg/m2 , oxaliplatin 85 mg/mg2 , docetaxel 50 mg/m2 , trastuzumab 6 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg d1, repeated d15 for four cycles preoperatively and postoperatively followed by 9 cycles of trastuzumab monotherapy) in patients with HER-2 positive EGA. Patients had ≥cT2, any N, M0 EGA. The primary endpoint was the rate of centrally assessed pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints comprised disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, toxicity and surgical morbidity. Fifty-six evaluable patients (median age 62 years) were included; n = 40 had tumors originating from the esophagogastric junction; T stage was (cT2/3/4/unknown): 4/42/8/2; n = 50 patients had cN+ disease. Main adverse events grades 3-4: leukopenia (17.9%), neutropenia (46.6%) and diarrhea (17.0%). All patients underwent tumor resections. R0 resection rate was 92.9%. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage. One postoperative death occurred. pCR was found in 12 patients (21.4%) and a further n = 14 patients (25.0%) had near complete response. Median DFS was 42.5 months and the 3-year OS rate was 82.1%. The primary endpoint of achieving a pCR >20% was reached. No unexpected safety issues were observed. Survival data are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
- Interdisziplinäres Tumorzentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Volker Kunzmann
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Fuchs
- Klinikum Bogenhausen, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Gastroenterologische Onkologie München, München, Germany
| | - Nils Homann
- Medizinische Klinik II Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie, Kliniken Mariahilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadine Schulte
- Interdisziplinäres Tumorzentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Kirsten Merx
- Interdisziplinäres Tumorzentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Pohl
- Medizinische Universitätsklinik Bochum, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | | | | | - Andrea Tannapfel
- Institut für Pathologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Quacken F, Greiffendorf I, Ropertz S, Peters D, Bergrath S, Aretz S, Lahm A, Pesch A, Wimmer-Dahmen ML, Graeven U. [Hospital inhouse contact tracing-significant impact to patient care during the coronavirus pandemic]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2021; 64:755-762. [PMID: 34021363 PMCID: PMC8139539 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03330-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Im Rahmen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie entwickelte sich der Kreis Heinsberg im Februar 2020 zu einem infektiologischen Epizentrum für Deutschland. Unser in unmittelbarer Nachbarschaft gelegenes Krankenhaus implementierte neben der Anpassung der Patientenversorgung sofort zusätzlich eine krankenhausinterne Organisationsstruktur zur Erfassung SARS-CoV-2-positiver Mitarbeiter, Patienten und deren Kontaktpersonen. Ziel der Arbeit Die im Contact Tracing erfassten Infektionen wurden analysiert und anhand eines beispielhaften Ausbruchs Infektionsketten und Nachverfolgungsprozesse evaluiert. Material und Methoden Daten zu Kontakten, Abstrichergebnissen und Quarantänetagen wurden mittels einer eigenen Datenbank dokumentiert und retrospektiv ausgewertet. Ergebnisse 568 Mitarbeiter wurden vom krankenhausinternen Contact Tracing erfasst. 32 Mitarbeiter (1,2 %, n = 2567) wurden als SARS-CoV-2-positiv erfasst. 50 % (16) davon wurden im Rahmen der Kontaktpersonennachverfolgung positiv getestet, 15,6 % (5) durch Routineabstriche erfasst. 34,4 % (11) waren Reiserückkehrer. Auffällig waren variable PCR-Ergebnisse der Kontrollabstriche dieser positiven Mitarbeiter. Bei 18,8 % (6) wurden bei zunächst negativem Kontrollabstrich im folgenden Kontrollabstrich wieder positive PCR-Ergebnisse gefunden. Das eigene Contact Tracing konnte Infektionshäufungen auf Non-COVID-19-Stationen frühzeitig aufdecken und gemeinsam mit der Klinikhygiene und dem Gesundheitsamt umfassende Maßnahmen zur Begrenzung der Virusausbreitung einleiten. Infektionsketten konnten früh durchbrochen werden. Diskussion Ein krankenhausinternes Contact Tracing erweist sich vor allem bei nicht auszuschließenden zukünftigen Infektionswellen als ein wesentlicher Bestandteil des klinischen Pandemiemanagements und ist essenziell zur Aufdeckung von lokalen Infektionsclustern. Zusatzmaterial online In der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00103-021-03330-z) finden Sie ein Flußschema zur Kontaktverfolgung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Quacken
- Geschäftsbereich Betriebsorganisation und Qualitätsmanagement, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Ingo Greiffendorf
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Susanne Ropertz
- Geschäftsbereich Betriebsorganisation und Qualitätsmanagement, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - David Peters
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Sebastian Bergrath
- Zentrum für Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland.,Lehrstuhl für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Sabine Aretz
- Betriebsärztlicher Dienst, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Lahm
- Klinikdirektion, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland.,Klinik für Orthopädie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Pesch
- Abteilung für Krankenhaushygiene, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kurreck A, Heinemann V, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kaiser F, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Graeven U, Heinrich K, Held S, Stahler A, Alig AHS, Jelas I, von Einem JC, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Modest DP. Treatment responses and disease dynamics in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab-based sequential versus combination chemotherapy: Analysis of a phase 3 trial (AIO KRK0110, XELAVIRI study). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3571 Background: Early response parameters such as early tumor shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR), and time to DpR represent exploratory endpoints that may serve as early efficacy endpoints and potential predictors of long-term outcome. We analyzed the association of these endpoints with bevacizumab-based sequential (initial fluoropyrimidines) versus combination (initial fluoropyrimidines plus irinotecan) chemotherapy within a randomized phase III trial. Methods: DpR (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), ETS (≥20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), and time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image) were analyzed in the XELAVIRI-trial. Moreover, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with ETS as stratification parameter (ETS vs. no ETS) according to treatment arm, molecular subgroup, and sex. Results: 370 patients were available for analysis of early treatment response parameters. A higher rate of ETS (60.9% vs. 43.5%; p = 0.001) and significantly greater DpR (-40.0% vs. -24.7%; p < 0.001) were observed in the initial combination compared to the sequential therapy arm, respectively. The improvement of ETS and DpR was pronounced in the subpopulation of RAS/ BRAF wildtype patients. Male in contrast to female patients significantly benefitted from initial combination treatment in terms of median DpR (male: -40.0% vs. -22.2%; p < 0.001; female: -34.0% vs. -24.4%; p = 0.13) and rate of ETS (male: 64.8% vs. 40.2%; p < 0.001; female: 52.5% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.73). Achievement of ETS correlated with improved survival irrespective of treatment arm (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.012) and molecular subgroup (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p < 0.001). Whereas the survival benefit in male patients achieving ETS was statistically significant (PFS: p < 0.001, HR 0.532 (0.409-0.692); OS: p < 0.001, HR 0.574 (0.437-0.756)), there were no significant differences in PFS (p = 0.107) and OS (p = 0.965) of female patients depending on ETS. Conclusions: In the XELAVIRI trial, initial irinotecan-based combination therapy with bevacizumab improves ETS and DpR in mCRC patients. Improvement in early response parameters appears pronounced in patients with RAS/ BRAF wildtype tumors suggesting a high sensitivity to irinotecan-based treatment. ETS was predictive of PFS and OS regardless of treatment arm. This finding was rather driven by male than female patients, potentially indicating that ETS might be less predictive of long-term outcome in an elderly, female population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jens Uhlig
- Medical Practice for Hematology and Oncology Muldental, Naunhof, Germany
| | - Michael Schenk
- Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Medical Department, Divison of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivan Jelas
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roesch R, Suedhoff T, Wendtner CM, Kullmann F, Kubin T, Schaich M, Mueller-Naendrup CU, Augustin M, Hartmann F, Illerhaus G, Hebart HF, Seggewiss-Bernhardt R, Graeven U, Naumann R, Kiani A. Prognostic value of pre-infection routine laboratory parameters for COVID-19 mortality in tumor patients: Results of the ADHOK Coronavirus Tumor Registry. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10571 Background: Tumor patients (pts.) are considered susceptible to severe COVID-19 after SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, they represent a heterogeneous group of individuals with variable risk. Identification of vulnerable subgroups is important for prioritization of vaccination strategies and possible early therapeutic intervention after infection. Methods: Tumor pts. with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the multicentric ADHOK registry by 22 institutions. Detailed information about tumor disease and treatment, as well as routine laboratory parameters determined at least 10 days prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection, was collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was defined as the outcome of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, graded according to the WHO: asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, critical, and COVID-19-related death. Results: Until Feb. 5, 2021, 215 pts. (67% with solid tumors, 33% with hematological neoplasms) were included in the registry. 74% of the pts. had an active malignancy. The course of SARS-CoV-2 infection was rather variable: 66% of the pts. remained asymptomatic or showed a mild-to-moderate course, while the rest developed severe or critical disease. The COVID-19-related mortality rate was 24%. Pre-infection routine laboratory values were available for 104 pts., obtained at a median of 21 days before SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared to COVID-19 survivors, COVID-19 non-survivors showed significantly higher median levels of absolute neutrophil count (ANC: 3.6 vs. 6.4 /nL; p = 0.006, n = 91), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR: 2.2 vs. 7.2; p = 0.005, n = 75), C-reactive protein (CRP: 9.9 vs. 42.0 mg/L; p = 0.001, n = 104), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH: 213.0 vs. 267.0 U/L; p = 0.016, n = 78). When categorized by a median split, COVID-19 mortality was significantly higher in pts. with ANC > 4.4 /nL (4% vs. 55%, p < 0.001), NLR > 4.1 (5% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), CRP > 15.4 mg/L (18% vs. 46%, p = 0.003), LDH > 236 U/L (15% vs. 49%, p = 0.003) and lymphocytes < 1.3 /nL (41% vs. 11% p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, ANC and CRP showed a strong and significant association with COVID-19-related death (OR 23.0 and 7.7, p = 0.007 and 0.029, respectively). To develop an easy-to-apply pre-infection score, we combined ANC and CRP and were able to separate three groups of pts. with significantly different COVID-19 outcomes (p < 0.001) (Table). Conclusions: Our results unveil subgroups of tumor pts. who may be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and point to pre-infection routine laboratory parameters with potential prognostic power: ANC and CRP may help identify pts. at risk for severe COVID-19 before SARS-CoV-2 infection.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Clemens M. Wendtner
- München Klinik Schwabing, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Immunologie, Palliativmedizin, Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin, München, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Kubin
- Klinikum Traunstein, Klinik für Hämatologie & Onkologie, Traunstein, Germany
| | - Markus Schaich
- Rems-Murr-Klinikum Winnenden, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Winnenden, Germany
| | | | | | - Frank Hartmann
- Klinikum Lippe, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Lemgo, Germany
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Klinikum Stuttgart, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ralph Naumann
- Marien Kliniken Siegen, Klinik für Hämatologie, Medizinische Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Siegen, Germany
| | - Alexander Kiani
- Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Medizinische Klinik IV, Bayreuth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Modest DP, Karthaus M, Frühauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, Koenig A, Von Weikersthal LF, Caca K, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Heinemann V, Held S, Jarosch A, Horst D, Kasper S, Stintzing S, Trarbach T. Maintenance therapy with 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin (5FU/LV) plus panitumumab (pmab) or 5FU/LV alone in RAS wildtype (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) - the PANAMA trial (AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3503 Background: Planned discontinuation or stop-and-go use of oxaliplatin are established strategies in the systemic therapy of mCRC. Consequently, and irrespective of antibody use, 5FU/LV represents the standard backbone of most maintenance strategies. Unlike VEGF-targeted substances, there is limited evidence that EGFR-antibodies add efficacy to 5FU/LV maintenance in RAS wildtype ( RAS WT) mCRC patients. Methods: Following induction therapy with six cycles of 5FU/LV, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and pmab, the trial randomized maintenance therapy with 5FU/LV plus pmab vs. 5FU/LV alone in a 1:1 fashion in patients (pts) with RAS WT mCRC. The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival: time from randomization until progression or death). With 218 events needed for PFS, the trial was designed to demonstrate superiority of the 5FU/LV+ pmab arm vs. 5FU/LV alone with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, power of 80% and a significance level of 10%. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response to induction- and maintenance therapy as well as quality of life. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01991873. Results: The full analysis set consists of 248 pts (125 pts 5FU/LV + pmab and 123 pts 5FU/LV) who were randomized and received maintenance therapy. Median age was 66 vs. 65 years, male patients were 69.6% vs. 63.4%, ECOG 0 was 56.8% vs. 60.2% in the respective trial arms (5FU/LV+ pmab vs. 5FU/LV). At data cut-off, with 218 events, PFS of maintenance therapy was improved with 5FU/LV+ pmab vs. 5FU/LV alone (8.8 (80% CI 7.6-10.2) months vs. 5.7 (80% CI 5.6-6.0) months, HR 0.72 (80%CI 0.60-0.85), p = 0.014). OS (event rate 54.4%) numerically favoured the 5FU/LV+ pmab arm (28.7 (95% CI 25.4-39.1) months) as compared to 5FU/LV alone (25.7 (95% CI 22.2-28.2) months), HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.60-1.18). Conclusion: In RAS WT mCRC, maintenance therapy with 5FU/LV+ pmab appears to be superior to 5FU/LV alone and should be regarded as standard of care maintenance regimen following induction therapy with FOLFOX plus pmab. Clinical trial information: NCT01991873.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine, Klinikum Neuperlach and Harlaching, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Koenig
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Karel Caca
- Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Hematology Oncology Practice Eppendorf, and University Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Clinics for Haematology, Oncology and Nephrology, Friedrich-Ebert Hospital, Neumuenster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Armin Jarosch
- Charité Medizinische Universitaet Berlin, Institute for Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Charité Medizinische Universitaet Berlin, Institute for Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie, Denzlingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kasper S, Goetze TO, Stintzing S, Hofheinz RD, Sinn M, Dechow TN, Ettrich TJ, Keitel V, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kolov A, Edelmann T, Stein A, Trarbach T, Junge S, Pauligk C, Virchow I, Siveke JT, Al-Batran SE, Schuler MH. RAMucirumab in combination with TAS102 versus TAS102 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Safety results from the phase IIb part of the RAMTAS phase II/III trial of the German AIO (AIO-KRK-0316). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3566 Background: Patients (pts) with mCRC progressing on standard chemotherapy have limited therapeutic options. Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) significantly improved survival in patients with refractory mCRC. Ramucirumab (ram) is approved in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment. There is a strong rationale to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ram in combination with TAS102 in pts with refractory mCRC. Methods: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, starting as phase IIb and extended to a phase III study in pts with advanced mCRC. Eligible pts were randomized to receive either ram (8 mg/kg on d1+15, q4w) and TAS102 (35 mg/m² on d1-5 and d8-12, q4w, arm A) or TAS102 alone (arm B). The primary endpoint is overall survival. A total of 145 pts were enrolled into phase IIb. Here, we present the data from an interim safety analysis comprising the first 80 treated pts. The trial was extended to phase III including a total of 426 pts. Enrolment of additional 281 pts started in Dec 2020. The trial endpoints remained unchanged. Results: Pts (40 arm A, 40 arm B) received a median of 2.5 treatment cycles in arm A and 2 cycles in arm B; 31 pts in treatment arm A and 32 pts in arm B discontinued participation prematurely, mainly due to cancer progression. Most patients developed adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs were observed in 28 pts (70%) in arm A (24 treatment-related) and 27 pts (67%, 17 treatment-related) in arm B. More grade 4 AEs were seen in arm A (13 pts, 32.5%) than in arm B (5 pts, 12.5%). In total, 46 Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred, 27 in arm A (10 treatment-related) and 19 in Arm B (2 treatment-related). Five SAEs (3 in arm A, 2 in arm B) had a fatal outcome (one in arm A treatment-related). Within the analyzed population, no SUSAR occurred. Conclusions: This safety analysis demonstrates a minor increase in AEs in the experimental arm but no unexpected events. There were no excessive toxicity or unacceptable risks. In summary, a favorable risk-benefit-profile was confirmed. Based on these safety results and the ongoing need for efficient treatment in the tested population, the trial was extended to phase III. Clinical trial information: NCT03520946.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Kasper
- University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Thorsten Oliver Goetze
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Sinn
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf II. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Verena Keitel
- University of Düsseldorf, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie Gastroonkologisches Studienzentrum, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Kolov
- VIDIA Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe Medizinische Klinik 2, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Stein
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf (HOPE), Facharztzentrum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Sabine Junge
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) GmbH at Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Isabel Virchow
- University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens T Siveke
- University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Martin H. Schuler
- University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Heinrich K, Modest DP, Ricard I, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kaiser F, Graeven U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Giessen-Jung C, Stahler A, Michl M, Held S, Jung A, Kirchner T, Stintzing S, Heinemann V. Gender-dependent survival benefit from first-line irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer. Subgroup analysis of a phase III trial (XELAVIRI-study, AIO-KRK-0110). Eur J Cancer 2021; 147:128-139. [PMID: 33647548 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND XELAVIRI compared sequential (Arm A) versus initial (Arm B) irinotecan in combination with fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, trial identification: NCT01249638. In the full analysis set of the study, non-inferiority of time to failure of strategy (TFS) was not shown. The present analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of gender on treatment outcome and tolerability. METHODS The study end-points overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), TFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in female versus male patients and in molecular subgroups (i.e. RAS mutational status). Interaction of treatment and gender was tested by likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS In total, 281 male and 140 female patients (n = 421) were evaluated. Among the male patients, the ORR was 33.6% without and 58.3% with initial irinotecan (P < 0.001). PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.69; P < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.85; P = 0.002) were also significantly better with initial irinotecan. Among the female patients, the ORR was 42.7% in Arm A and 43.1% in Arm B, PFS was similar (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.76-1.55; P = 0.649) without and with initial irinotecan. A strong trend for inferior outcome with regard to OS with initial irinotecan was observed (HR 1.46; 95% CI 0.95-2.24; P = 0.081) and the trend reached significance in the multivariate analysis (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.08-2.95; P = 0.02). Formal interaction of treatment and gender was observed for ORR (P = 0.018), PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events were not significantly different between male and female patients. CONCLUSIONS The present analysis suggests that gender interacts with efficacy of initial irinotecan when used in combination with fluoropyrimidines and bevacizumab. Although male patients derived a significant and clinically meaningful benefit from initial combination chemotherapy, this was not observed in female patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Dominik P Modest
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Department, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingrid Ricard
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Krankenhaus St. Franziskus, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Michael Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Peuser
- Onkologische Praxis Am Diakonissenhaus, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Department, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marlies Michl
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Jung
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institut für Pathologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institut für Pathologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Department, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kosmala R, Fokas E, Flentje M, Sauer R, Liersch T, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Arnold D, Hofheinz RD, Ghadimi M, Ströbel P, Staib L, Grabenbauer GG, Folprecht G, Kirste S, Uter W, Gall C, Rödel C, Polat B. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients with or without oxaliplatin in the randomised CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase 3 trial. Eur J Cancer 2020; 144:281-290. [PMID: 33383348 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CAO/ARO/AIO trial has shown that oxaliplatin added to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy significantly improved disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Here, we present a post-hoc analysis of quality of life (QoL) in disease-free patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2006 and 2010, 1236 patients with LARC were randomly assigned either to preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and postoperative chemotherapy (N = 623) or combined with oxaliplatin (N = 613). QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, colorectal module CR38) were completed at baseline, after postoperative chemotherapy and during follow-up. Analysis was performed according intent-to-treat. RESULTS Available questionnaires (baseline) were 82% (N = 512) in the control and 84% (N = 513) in the investigational group. Response rates were 49% (533 of 1086) at 1 year and 43% (403 of 928) at 3 years. Global health status (GHS) for disease-free patients was stable in both groups (range 0-100). At baseline: standard arm 62.0 (mean, SD 21.6; N = 491) versus oxaliplatin arm 63.2 (mean, SD 22; N = 503); at 3 years: 69.4 (SD 19.3; N = 187) versus 65.4 (SD 22.2; N = 202). After treatment and at 3 years, no significant differences (≥10 points) between groups were found in QoL subscales. Disease-free patients experiencing neurotoxic side-effects (grade 1-4) showed reduced GHS at 3 years versus patients without neurotoxicity (mean 59.2 versus 69.3; P < 0.001), while grade 3-4 rate was low. CONCLUSION The addition of oxaliplatin was not associated with worse overall QoL. This information is of interest to patients in many ongoing rectal cancer trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION NCT00349076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekka Kosmala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Frankfurt, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Germany; German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Torsten Liersch
- Department of General, Visceral and Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Haematology/Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Palliative Care, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
- Interdisciplinary Tumour Center, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ludger Staib
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Gerhard G Grabenbauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, DiaCura & Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - Gunnar Folprecht
- Medical Department I, University Cancer Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christine Gall
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Frankfurt, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Germany; German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kasper S, Hofheinz R, Stintzing S, Götze T, Sinn M, Dechow T, Ettrich T, Keitel V, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kolov A, Edelmann T, Stein A, Trarbach T, Junge S, Pauligk C, Virchow I, Siveke J, Al-Batran SE, Schuler M. 438P Interim safety analysis of the phase IIb study of ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 vs. TAS102 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: The RAMTAS trial of the German AIO. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
39
|
Kurreck A, Heinemann V, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kaiser F, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Graeven U, Schwaner I, Stahler A, Heinrich K, Jung A, Held S, von Einem JC, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Modest DP. Impact of age on efficacy and early mortality of initial sequential treatment versus upfront combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a subgroup analysis of a phase III trial (AIO KRK0110, XELAVIRI study). Eur J Cancer 2020; 137:81-92. [PMID: 32750502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The XELAVIRI study compared application of fluoropyrimidine (FP) and bevacizumab (Bev) followed by sequential escalation to irinotecan (Iri), FP and Bev (arm A) to upfront combination therapy with FP, Iri and Bev (arm B) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To elucidate the impact of age on survival, we evaluated efficacy and early mortality in the underlying trial. METHODS Patients were stratified for age in three cohorts (<65 years, 65-74 years and ≥75 years). Survival end-points were expressed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank testing and Cox regression. Objective response and 60-day mortality were evaluated by chi-square testing. RESULTS The efficacy analyses suggest more substantial benefit from upfront combination chemotherapy in younger patients with mCRC. Elderly patients (≥75 years) derived limited benefit from upfront combination chemotherapy, particularly in terms of overall survival. Of 421 randomised patients, 13 patients (3.1%) died within 60 days after treatment initiation with the highest prevalence in elderly patients (1.6% < 65 years, 2.8% 65-74 years and 5.2% ≥ 75 years, p = 0.26). The frequency of 60-day mortality was significantly associated with age (with a maximum of 8.7% in patients aged ≥75 years) in patients undergoing upfront combination therapy (p = 0.027) but not in patients receiving sequential treatment (p = 0.63). CONCLUSION Combination therapy with FP, Iri and Bev does not substantially improve the outcome of patients aged ≥75 years as compared with sequential treatment algorithm. These patients appear to be at a relevant risk for 60-day mortality under Iri-based combination chemotherapy plus Bev.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Kurreck
- Charité University Medicine, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians Universität (LMU), Department of Medical Oncology & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael Schenk
- Clinic 'Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg', Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Peuser
- Oncological Practice am Diakonissenhaus, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Ingo Schwaner
- Oncological Practice Kurfürstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians Universität (LMU), Department of Medical Oncology & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians Universität (LMU), Department of Medical Oncology & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany; Ludwig Maximilians-University, Department of Pathology, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jobst C von Einem
- Charité University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians Universität (LMU), Department of Medical Oncology & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité University Medicine, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CVK), Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Weisel K, Asemissen AM, Besemer B, Haenel M, Blau IW, Goerner M, Ko YD, Dürig J, Staib P, Mann C, Lutz R, Munder M, Graeven U, Peceny R, Salwender H, Zago M, Benner A, Tichy D, Bokemeyer C, Goldschmidt H. Depth of response to isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in front-line treatment of high-risk multiple myeloma: Interim analysis of the GMMG-CONCEPT trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.8508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8508 Background: High-risk (HR) multiple myeloma (MM) still has a significant impaired prognostic outcome. Addition of CD38 monoclonal antibodies to standard-of-care regimens significantly improved response rates and depth of response in newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory MM patients (pts). Here, we report the prespecified end of induction interim analysis (IA) of the investigator-initiated GMMG-CONCEPT trial (NCT03104842), evaluating the quadruplet regimen isatuximab plus carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in HR NDMM pts. Methods: 153 pts with HR NDMM are planned to be included into the trial. HR MM is defined by the presence of del17p or t(4;14) or t(14;16) or > 3 copies 1q21 and ISS 2 or 3 stage disease. Pts receive 6 cycles of Isa-KRd induction, 4 cycles of Isa-KRd consolidation and Isa-KR maintenance. Transplant eligible pts (arm A) undergo high-dose therapy. Transplant ineligible pts (arm B) receive 2 additional cycles of Isa-KRd induction. The primary endpoint is MRD negativity measured by next-generation flow after consolidation. This IA reports on overall response rates (ORR) after induction. Additional MRD analysis will be presented. Results: 50 pts (46 arm A, 4 arm B) were included in the IA population for ORR. HR MM was defined by del17p in 52%, t(4;14) in 38%, t(14;16) in 12% and > 3 copies 1q21 in 42%. 39/46 pts in arm A and 4/4 pts in arm B completed induction treatment. ORR was 100%, with 5 pts (10.0%) showing partial response (PR), 22 (44.0%; including 4 in arm B) very good partial response (VGPR) and 23 (46.0 %) complete response (CR). Median stem cell yield was 6.6 × 106CD34+ cells/kg. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥ 10%) with Isa-KRd included neutropenia (34.0%), leukopenia (26.0%) and thrombocytopenia (14.0%). Main non-hematologic toxicities grade 3/4 were hypertension (12.0%) and infection (8.0%). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time on a trial investigating solely HR NDMM and Isa-KRd quadruplet treatment. Isa-KRd induction induces deep responses in HR MM pts. The overall safety profile of Isa-KRd is expected and consistent with previous reports. The study is ongoing, with pts continuing to be included. Clinical trial information: 03104842 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Weisel
- University Medical Center of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Mathias Haenel
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Igor W. Blau
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Dürig
- Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Raphael Lutz
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Third Department of Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Manola Zago
- Center for Clinical Trials, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Diana Tichy
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hofheinz RD, Arnold D, Fokas E, Kaufmann M, Hothorn T, Folprecht G, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Ghadimi M, Liersch T, Grabenbauer GG, Sauer R, Rödel C, Graeven U. Impact of age on the efficacy of oxaliplatin in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1793-1799. [PMID: 29873684 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The German rectal cancer trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 has shown a significant benefit in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to a standard preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The use of oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with colon cancer is controversial. We therefore investigated the impact of age on clinical outcome in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods We carried out a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial evaluating primary and secondary end points according to age. Patient and tumor characteristics, NCI CTC adverse events grades 3-4 (version 3.0), dose intensities as well as survival and recurrence data were analyzed in three specified age groups (<60, 60-70, and ≥70 years). The influence of age as a continuous variable on DFS was modeled using a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis. Results A total of 1232 patients were assessable. With the exception of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P < 0.001), no differences in patient and tumor characteristics were noticed between age groups. Likewise, toxicity pattern, dose intensities of CRT and surgical results were similar in all age groups. After a median follow-up of 50 months, in patients aged <60 years a significant benefit of adding oxaliplatin to 5-FU-based CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy was observed for local (P = 0.013) and systemic recurrences (P = 0.023), DFS (P = 0.011), and even overall survival (OS; P = 0.044). The STEPP analysis revealed improved hazard ratios for DFS in patients aged 40-70 years compared with elderly patients treated with oxaliplatin. Conclusion The addition of oxaliplatin significantly improved DFS and OS in younger patients aged <60 years with advanced rectal cancer. Patients aged ≥70 years had no benefit. Clinical Trials Number NCT00349076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R-D Hofheinz
- Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - D Arnold
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Asklepios Clinic Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Kaufmann
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Hothorn
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - G Folprecht
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - R Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - W Hohenberger
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - M Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - T Liersch
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - G G Grabenbauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, DiaCura & Klinikum, Coburg, Germany
| | - R Sauer
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - U Graeven
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fokas E, Fietkau R, Hartmann A, Hohenberger W, Grützmann R, Ghadimi M, Liersch T, Ströbel P, Grabenbauer GG, Graeven U, Hofheinz RD, Köhne CH, Wittekind C, Sauer R, Kaufmann M, Hothorn T, Rödel C. Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1521-1527. [PMID: 29718095 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surrogate end points in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation are lacking as their statistical validation poses major challenges, including confirmation based on large phase III trials. We examined the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score that incorporates weighted cT, ypT and ypN categories for disease-free survival (DFS) in 1191 patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods Cox regression models adjusted for treatment arm, resection status, and NAR score were used in multivariable analysis. The four Prentice criteria (PC1-4) were used to assess individual-level surrogacy of NAR for DFS. Results After a median follow-up of 50 months, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved 3-year DFS [75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.30% to 79.50%) versus 71.3% (95% CI 67.60% to 74.90%); P = 0.034; PC 1) and resulted in a shift toward lower NAR groups (P = 0.034, PC 2) compared with fluorouracil-only CRT. The 3-year DFS was 91.7% (95% CI 88.2% to 95.2%), 81.8% (95% CI 78.4% to 85.1%), and 58.1% (95% CI 52.4% to 63.9%) for low, intermediate, and high NAR score, respectively (P < 0.001; PC 3). NAR score remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS [low versus high NAR: hazard ratio (HR) 4.670; 95% CI 3.106-7.020; P < 0.001; low versus intermediate NAR: HR 1.971; 95% CI 1.303-2.98; P = 0.001] in multivariable analysis. Notwithstanding the inherent methodological difficulty in interpretation of PC 4 to establish surrogacy, the treatment effect on DFS was captured by NAR, supporting satisfaction of individual-level PC 4. Conclusion Our study validates the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of NAR score for DFS within a large randomized phase III trial. NAR score could help oncologists to speed up response-adapted therapeutic decision, and further large phase III trial data sets should aim to confirm trial-level surrogacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - R Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - W Hohenberger
- Department of General and Visceral, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Grützmann
- Department of General and Visceral, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - T Liersch
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - P Ströbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - G G Grabenbauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, DiaCura & Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - U Graeven
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - R-D Hofheinz
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C-H Köhne
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - C Wittekind
- Institute of Pathology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R Sauer
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Kaufmann
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Hothorn
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bergrath S, Castillo-Vargas JS, Koc NJ, Haake H, Graeven U. Suspected seizure—survival of a lethal dose of the rodenticide alpha-chloralose. Anaesthesist 2019; 68:843-847. [DOI: 10.1007/s00101-019-00692-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
44
|
Salwender H, Bertsch U, Weisel K, Duerig J, Kunz C, Benner A, Blau IW, Raab MS, Hillengass J, Hose D, Huhn S, Hundemer M, Andrulis M, Jauch A, Seidel-Glaetzer A, Lindemann HW, Hensel M, Fronhoffs S, Martens U, Hansen T, Wattad M, Graeven U, Munder M, Fenk R, Haenel M, Scheid C, Goldschmidt H. Rationale and design of the German-speaking myeloma multicenter group (GMMG) trial HD6: a randomized phase III trial on the effect of elotuzumab in VRD induction/consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:504. [PMID: 31138244 PMCID: PMC6537200 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5600-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite major advances in therapy, multiple myeloma is still an incurable malignancy in the majority of patients. To increase survival, deeper remissions (i.e. CR) translating into longer PFS need to be achieved. Incorporation of new drugs (i.e. bortezomib and lenalidomide) as induction and maintenance treatment in an intensified treatment concept, including high dose melphalan (200 mg/m2), has resulted in increased CR rates, and is considered the standard of care for younger patients. Elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone has given better results as lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in a phase III trial. The GMMG-HD6 trial will be the first phase III trial investigating the role of elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) induction/consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance within a high dose concept. Methods GMMG-HD6 is a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial. The planned recruitment number is 564 NDMM patients. All patients will receive 4 VRD cycles as induction and undergo peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting. Thereafter they will be treated with high dose melphalan therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by 2 cycles of VRD consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance. Patients in arm B1 + B2 will additionally receive elotuzumab in the induction phase, whereas patients in A2 + B2 will be treated with elotuzumab added to consolidation and maintenance. The primary endpoint of the trial is PFS. Secondary objectives and endpoints are OS, CR rates after induction therapy comparing the two arms VRD (A1 + A2) vs VRD + elotuzumab (B1 + B2), CR rates after consolidation treatment, best response to treatment during the study, time to progression (TTP), duration of response (DOR), toxicity and quality of life. Results Since this is the publication of a study protocol of an ongoing study, no results can be presented. Discussion This phase III trial is designed to evaluate whether the addition of elotuzumab to an intensified treatment concept with high dose melphalan chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation and induction, consolidation and maintenance treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide is able to improve PFS compared to the same concept without elotuzumab. Trial registration NCT02495922 on June 24th, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Hospital Hamburg, Altona, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, 22763, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Uta Bertsch
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Weisel
- University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Duerig
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christina Kunz
- German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Igor W Blau
- Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Dirk Hose
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Mindaugas Andrulis
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Seidel-Glaetzer
- Cordination Center for Clinical Trials, University of Heidelberg (KKS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Stefan Fronhoffs
- Zentrum fuer ambulante Haematologie und Onkologie Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany
| | | | - Timon Hansen
- University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Krankenhaus Maria Hilf Moenchengladbach, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Roland Fenk
- University Hospital Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Heinrich K, Modest DP, Ricard I, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Graeven U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Peveling genannt Reddemann C, Giessen-Jung C, Stahler A, Held S, Jung A, Kirchner T, Stintzing S, Heinemann V. Gender and survival benefit from initial irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of the XELAVIRI (AIOKRK0110) study. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.3559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3559 Background: XELAVIRI compared initial vs sequential irinotecan (iri) in combination with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with mCRC, trial identification: NCT01249638. In the full analysis set of the study, non-inferiority of time to failure of strategy (TFS) was not shown (primary endpoint). Pts with RAS/BRAF wildtype (wt) tumors benefitted from initial iri. Methods: The study endpoints objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to failure of strategy (TFS) as well as overall survival (OS) were evaluated in female vs. male pts as well as molecular subgroups (i.e. RAS mutational status). Interaction of treatment and gender was tested by likelihood ratio tests. Results: Of 421 patients, 281/140 were male/female. In male patients, ORR was 33.6% without and 58.3% with initial iri (P < 0.001). PFS (HR: 0.54 (95%CI 0.42-0.69) P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.63 (95%CI 0.47-0.85), P = 0.002), were also significantly better with initial iri. In the subgroup analysis, this effect was especially pronounced in pts with RAS/BRAF wt tumors. In female pts, ORR was 43% in both arms, PFS was similar (HR: 1.09 (95%CI 0.76-1.55), P = 0.65) without and with initial iri. In OS, a strong trend for inferior outcome with initial iri was seen (HR: 1.46 (95%CI 0.95-2.24), P = 0.08) that reached significance in the multivariate analysis (HR: 1.73 (95%CI 1.04-2.86, P = 0.034). Female patients with RAS/BRAF wt tumors did not benefit from initial iri (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.46-2.41), P = 0.903 for OS). Formal interaction of treatment and gender was seen for ORR (P = 0.018), PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.001). There were some trends for more pronounced toxicities in female pts treated with Irinotecan. Conclusions: This unplanned exploratory analysis suggests that gender might interact with efficacy of initial iri when used in the context of FP and bev. While especially male RAS wild-type patients derived a significant and clinically meaningful benefit from initial use of iri, this was not observed in female patients with RAS wt tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT01249638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingrid Ricard
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Jens Uhlig
- Medical Practice for Hematology and Oncology Muldental, Naunhof, Germany
| | - Michael Schenk
- Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Jung
- Pathologisches Institut der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kasper S, zur Hausen G, Stein A, Stintzing S, Berger A, Loges S, Hofheinz R, Trarbach T, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goetze TO, Hagen VA, Burock S, Hoffmeister A, Dechow TN, Pauligk C, Virchow I, Siveke JT, Al-Batran SE, Schuler MH. A phase IIb study of ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 versus TAS102 monotherapy in metastatic, chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients: The RAMTAS trial of the German AIO (KRK-0316). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps3617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS3617 Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with progressive disease on/after or who are intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, anti-angiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies have limited therapeutic options and a dismal prognosis, with a median survival below 6 months. Recently, Trifluridin/Tipiracil (TAS102) significantly improved survival in patients with refractory mCRC and ramucirumab has been approved in combination with FOLFIRI for the treatment of patients with mCRC after prior FOLFOX/bevacizumab first line therapy. Previous studies on both components provide a strong rationale to conduct a randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 in patients with refractory mCRC to improve efficacy and prevent resistance. Methods: This is an interventional, randomized, open label, multicenter, phase IIb study in patients with advanced mCRC. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 and receive either ramucirumab and TAS102 (ramucirumab 8 mg/kg on d1+15, q4w and TAS102 35 mg/m² on d1-5 and d8-12, q4w) or TAS102 alone. Primary endpoint is overall survival as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, assuming a 6 months survival probability of 70% with ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 and 58% with TAS102 alone. Treatment groups are compared using the log-rank test. A total of 144 patients will be enrolled at 30 sites (1-sided alpha 0.10, power 0.80). Main secondary endpoints are overall response rate, disease control rate, progression free survival and quality of life. In addition, a large comprehensive translational research program will be conducted to identify novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers. The study started in December 2018. By February 2019, a total of 3 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03520946.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerrit zur Hausen
- IKF Cancer Research GmbH at Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alexander Stein
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Oncology, Haematology, Stem Cell transplantation and Pneumology, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Berger
- Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie und Interventionelle Endoskopie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Loges
- II. Medical Clinic & Institute of Tumor Biology, Campus Forschung, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Hofheinz
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Tagestherapiezentrum am ITM, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie, Denzlingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Thorsten Oliver Goetze
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Institut für Klinisch-Onkologische Forschung and IKF Klinische Krebsforschung GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Universitätsklinikum Leipzig Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie und Rheumatologie, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Pauligk
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Institut für Klinisch-Onkologische Forschung and IKF Klinische Krebsforschung GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Isabel Virchow
- University Clinics University of Duisburg/ Essen Western German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens T Siveke
- University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institute of Clinical Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Diefenhardt M, Hofheinz RD, Martin D, Beißbarth T, Arnold D, Hartmann A, von der Grün J, Grützmann R, Liersch T, Ströbel P, Grabenbauer GG, Rieger M, Fietkau R, Graeven U, Weitz J, Folprecht G, Ghadimi M, Rödel F, Rödel C, Fokas E. Leukocytosis and neutrophilia as independent prognostic immunological biomarkers for clinical outcome in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase 3 rectal cancer trial. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:2282-2291. [PMID: 30868576 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Peripheral blood leukocytosis and neutrophilia reflect cancer inflammation and have been proposed as prognostic immunological biomarkers in various malignancies. However, previous studies were limited by their retrospective nature and small patient numbers. Baseline peripheral blood leukocytes, neutrophils, hemoglobin, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics, and clinical outcome in 1236 patients with rectal cancer treated with 5-FU-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone or with oxaliplatin followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase 3 trial. Multivariable analyses were performed using Cox regression models. After a median follow-up of 50 months, baseline leukocytosis remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.457; 95% CI 1.163-1.825; p = 0.001), distant metastasis (HR 1.696; 95% CI 1.266-2.273; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; HR 1.716; 95% CI 1.264-2.329; p = 0.001) in multivariable analysis. Similar significant findings were observed for neutrophilia and high CEA levels. Conversely, treatment-induced leukopenia correlated with favorable DFS (p = 0.037), distant metastasis (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.012). Intriguingly, addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU CRT resulted in a significant DFS improvement only in patients with neutrophilia and leukocytosis (p = 0.028 and p = 0.002). Our findings have important clinical implications and provide high-level evidence on the adverse prognostic role of leukocytes and neutrophils, and the impact of chemotherapy in the context of these biomarkers. These data could help guide patient stratification and should be further validated within prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Diefenhardt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tim Beißbarth
- Department of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Robert Grützmann
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Torsten Liersch
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gerhard G Grabenbauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, DiaCura & Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rieger
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of General and Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gunar Folprecht
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kosmala R, Fokas E, Flentje M, Sauer R, Liersch T, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Arnold D, Hofheinz R, Ghadimi M, Raab H, Ströbel P, Staib L, Grabenbauer G, Folprecht G, Uter W, Gall C, Rödel C, Polat B. OC-0384 QoL after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer with/without oxaliplatin (phase 3, CAO/ARO/AIO-04). Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30804-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
49
|
Modest DP, Ricard I, Heinrich K, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Graeven U, Stahler A, Jung A, Kirchner T, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Gender and survival benefit from initial irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of the XELAVIRI (AIOKRK0110) study. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
549 Background: XELAVIRI compared initial versus sequential irinotecan (iri) in combination with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with mCRC, trial identification: NCT01249638. In the full analysis set of the study, non inferiority of time to failure of strategy (TFS) of the sequential use could not be demonstrated (primary endpoint). Methods: The secondary endpoints overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS) were evaluated in female versus male pts as well as molecular subgroups (RAS mutational status). Interaction of treatment and gender was tested by likelihood ratio tests. Results: Of 421 patients, 281/140 were male/female. In female pts, ORR was 43% in both arms, PFS was 8.9 (95% CI 6.8-11.1) versus 10.1 (95% CI 8.5-11.8) months (HR: 1.09 (95% CI 0.76-1.55), P = 0.65) in pts with initial iri versus pts without initial iri, respectively. In females, a trend for inferior OS with initial iri was seen: 21.8 (95% CI 14.8-28.8) months with initial iri versus 28.4 (95% CI 21.9-34.9) months without initial iri (HR: 1.46 (95% CI 0.95-2.24), P = 0.08). This difference was significant in the multivariate analysis (HR: 1.73 (95% CI 1.04-2.86, P = 0.034). Male pts benefitted across all analysed endpoints from initial iri: ORR was 58.3% with initial iri and 33.6% without iri (P < 0.001), PFS was 10.1 (95% CI 9.2-11.0) versus 7.4 (95% CI 6.3-8.5) months (HR: 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.69) P < 0.001) and OS 23.9 (95% CI 19.1- 28.6) versus 20.5 (95% CI 18.1-22.9) months (HR: 0.63 (95% CI 0.47-0.85), P = 0.002), with initial iri versus without initial iri, respectively. Interaction of treatment and gender was seen for ORR (P = 0.018), PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.001). Additional data including treatment and toxicities will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This unplanned exploratory analysis suggests that gender might interact with efficacy of initial iri when used in the context of FP and bev. While male patients derived a significant and clinically meaningful benefit from initial use of iri, this was not observed in female patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01249638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingrid Ricard
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andreas Jung
- Department of Pathology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Peveling genannt Reddemann C, Graeven U, Schuch G, Schwaner I, Stahler A, Jung A, Kirchner T, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Sequential Versus Combination Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Fluoropyrimidines, Irinotecan, and Bevacizumab: A Randomized, Controlled Study—XELAVIRI (AIO KRK0110). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:22-32. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The XELAVIRI trial investigated the optimal treatment strategy for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. We tested the noninferiority of initial treatment with a fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab, followed by the addition of irinotecan at first progression (arm A) versus upfront use of fluoropyrimidine plus irinotecan plus bevacizumab (arm B) in a 1:1 randomized, controlled phase III trial. Methods The primary efficacy end point was time to failure of the strategy (TFS). Given a 90% CI, a power of 70%, and a one-sided α of .05, the margin for noninferiority was set at 0.8. In the case of demonstrated noninferiority of TFS, an analysis of symptomatic toxicities during TFS would define the superior strategy. Secondary end points included the effect of molecular subgroups on efficacy parameters. Results A total of 421 randomly assigned patients (arm A: n = 212; arm B: n = 209) formed the full analysis set. Median age was 71 and 69 years, respectively. Noninferiority of TFS was not shown (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 90% CI, 0.73 to 1.02). In detail, patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors benefitted from combination chemotherapy (HR, 0.61; 90% CI, 0.46 to 0.82; P = .005), whereas patients with RAS mutant tumors (HR, 1.09; 90% CI, 0.81 to 1.46; P = .58) did not (Cox model for interaction of study arm and RAS status: P = .03). Comparable results were obtained for overall survival. Conclusion Noninferiority of sequential escalation therapy compared with initial combination chemotherapy could not be demonstrated for TFS. RAS status may be important to guide therapy as treatment of patients with upfront combination therapy was clearly superior in RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, whereas sequential escalation chemotherapy seems to provide comparable results in patients with RAS mutant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Paul Modest
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jens Uhlig
- Private Oncological Practice, Naunhof, Germany
| | - Michael Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Peuser
- Onkologische Praxis am Diakonissenhaus, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Gunter Schuch
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Schwaner
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Jung
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
- Ludwig Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
- Ludwig Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Stintzing
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|