Germline gain-of-function MMP11 variant results in an aggressive form of colorectal cancer

Matrix metalloproteinase-11 (MMP11) is an enzyme with proteolytic activity against matrix and nonmatrix proteins. Although most MMPs are secreted as inactive proenzymes and are later activated extracellularly, MMP11 is activated intracellularly by furin within the constitutive secretory pathway. It is a key factor in physiological tissue remodeling and its alteration may play an important role in the progression of epithelial malignancies and other diseases. TCGA colon and colorectal adenocarcinoma data showed that upregulation of MMP11 expression correlates with tumorigenesis and malignancy. Here, we provide evidence that a germline variant in the MMP11 gene (NM_005940: c.232C>T; p.(Pro78Ser)), identified by whole exome sequencing, can increase the tumorigenic properties of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. P78S is located in the prodomain region, which is responsible for blocking MMP11's protease activity. This variant was detected in the proband and all the cancer-affected family members analyzed, while it was not detected in healthy relatives. In silico analyses predict that P78S could have an impact on the activation of the enzyme. Furthermore, our in vitro analyses show that the expression of P78S in HCT116 cells increases tumor cell invasion and proliferation. In summary, our results show that this variant could modify the structure of the MMP11 prodomain, producing a premature or uncontrolled activation of the enzyme that may contribute to an early CRC onset in these patients. The study of this gene in other CRC cases will provide further information about its role in CRC development, which might improve patient treatment in the future.

Abstract P2-01-18: Orthogonal assessment of PIK3CA and ESR1 mutation detection in longitudinal cfDNA samples from endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients using dPCR and NGS-based SafeSEQ technology

Background: Indentification of actionable or therapy resistance-associated mutations may guide sequential treatments in Hormone Receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) patients with resistance to prior endocrine therapies. Molecular profiling from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is progressively permeating the clinical setting as an alternative or adjunct to tissue biopsies. Digital PCR (dPCR) assays permit the detection of genomic alterations with high sensitivity but are associated with cumbersome workflows and limited genomic coverage. NGS-based cfDNA assays are being increasingly adopted, as they can offer broader coverage while maintaining competitive sensitivity. Methods:Mutation testing was performed on plasma samples obtained from patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who had recurred or progressed after receiving an aromatase inhibitor. Samples were collected at the start of new treatment, during therapy, and at progression. dPCR tests were carried out using QuantStudio3D Digital PCR at the Molecular Oncology Laboratory at Clínico San Carlos Hospital. dPCR targets included PIK3CA E542K, E545K, and H1047R, and ESR1 Y537S and D538G. Samples[CdS1] were also tested with the SafeSEQ Breast Cancer Panel to assess clinically relevant genomic regions across PIK3CA, ESR1, AKT1, TP53, KRAS, and ERBB2. SafeSEQ testing was performed in Sysmex Inostics’ CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory. Results: Mutational data obtained from both dPCR and SafeSEQ testing were available for concordance analysis in 107 samples from 50 patients for PIK3CA, and 86 samples from 41 patients for ESR1. Combined results showed PIK3CA mutations in 47 samples (43.9%), with H1047R (14%), E545K (11.2%), and E542K (9.3%) being the most frequent mutations detected. ESR1 mutations were present in 35 samples (32.7%), where D538G (19.6%) and Y537S (9.3%) were most commonly observed. Among samples with no mutations detected by dPCR, the expanded coverage of SafeSEQ enabled the detection of clinically relevant mutations in PIK3CA and ESR1 in 10 (9.3%) and 3 (2.8%) samples, respectively. The concordance rates for dPCR and SafeSEQ were 93.1% and 88.9% for PIK3CA and ESR1, with positive percent agreements (PPA) of 93.8% and 84.6%, and negative percent agreements (NPA) of 92.8% and 90.9% for PIK3CA and ESR1, respectively. A strong correlation was observed between MAF levels (Spearman's ρ = 0.87 [95% CI 0.79-0.93], p<0.001) as well as number of mutant molecules per mL of plasma (ρ = 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.88], p<0.001). When samples with MAFs<0.1% were evaluated, lower concordance rate was detected (38.5%; N=13; 46.2% detected by SafeSEQ and 92.3% by dPCR). Finally, no significant difference between assays was found when comparing concordance rates among samples at different timepoints. Regarding longitudinal ctDNA data, 18 and 16 patients showed mutations in PIK3CA and/or ESR1 in plasma at least in one timepoint. Monitoring results were concordant in 50%/56.3% of patients for PIK3CA/ESR1 (during therapy and/or at progression time, 5.6%/18.8% of patients showed decrease or clearance of ctDNA and 38.9%/25% showed increase of ctDNA).Conclusion:In this cohort of AI-progressing HR+/HER2- ABC patients, dPCR and SafeSEQ methods showed high overall agreement for the detection of mutations in PIK3CA and ESR1, key genes for clinical decision-making and enrollment in clinical trials. The expanded coverage of SafeSEQ makes it a powerful tool to inform patient management considering the growing pool of clinically relevant genomic alterations in this type of patients. Efforts are ongoing to expand the analysis to a larger cohort and incorporate long-term outcomes and multivariate adjustment. Supported by AstraZeneca.

Citation Format: Jesus Fuentes Antras, Vanesa García-Barberán, Fernando Moreno, Hillary Sloane, Igor López-Cade, Alicia De Luna, Alejandro Pascual, Carmen Ramirez-Ruda, Victor Lorca, Paloma Flores, Pedro Perez-Segura, Alberto Ocaña, Jennifer Preston, Hannah Quinn, Frederick Jones, Jose Angel Garcia-Saenz. Orthogonal assessment of PIK3CA and ESR1 mutation detection in longitudinal cfDNA samples from endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients using dPCR and NGS-based SafeSEQ technology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-18.

Association of Genomic Domains in BRCA1 and BRCA2 with Prostate Cancer Risk and Aggressiveness

Pathogenic sequence variants (PSV) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk and severity of prostate cancer. We evaluated whether PSVs in BRCA1/2 were associated with risk of overall prostate cancer or high grade (Gleason 8+) prostate cancer using an international sample of 65 BRCA1 and 171 BRCA2 male PSV carriers with prostate cancer, and 3,388 BRCA1 and 2,880 BRCA2 male PSV carriers without prostate cancer. PSVs in the 3' region of BRCA2 (c.7914+) were significantly associated with elevated risk of prostate cancer compared with reference bin c.1001-c.7913 [HR = 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.52; P = 0.001], as well as elevated risk of Gleason 8+ prostate cancer (HR = 3.11; 95% CI, 1.63-5.95; P = 0.001). c.756-c.1000 was also associated with elevated prostate cancer risk (HR = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.71-4.68; P = 0.00004) and elevated risk of Gleason 8+ prostate cancer (HR = 4.95; 95% CI, 2.12-11.54; P = 0.0002). No genotype-phenotype associations were detected for PSVs in BRCA1. These results demonstrate that specific BRCA2 PSVs may be associated with elevated risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: Aggressive prostate cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers may vary according to the specific BRCA2 mutation inherited by the at-risk individual.

Mutational profile of dysplastic lesions evolving to laryngeal cancer

e17551

Background: Few studies have addressed the carcinogenic process of laryngeal cancer from its premalignant phases. Our aim was to compare mutational status of laryngeal dysplasias (LD) evolving to laryngeal cancer (ELC) and not evolving to LC (NELC). Methods: Retrospective study of LD diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. A customized 15-gene NGS panel (DICER, IRF6, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, NOTCH3, NOTCH2NLA, PIK3CA, PTEN, RB1, RIPK4, SYNE1, SYNE2, TP53, TP63, CASP8) was used for mutational analysis with Truseq Custom Amplicon (Illumina) performed in FFPE LD samples and results compared between LD-ELC and LD-NELC. Results: Sixty-four patients (pts) with LD were identified. LD-ELC (N = 23) and LD-NELC (N = 41) were scored as mild (N = 40; NELC: 32 / ELC:8), moderate (N = 8; NELC: 4/ ELC: 4) and severe (N = 16; NELC:5 / ELC: 11). Prior or current moderate-to-heavy tobacco smoking ( > 10 pack-year): 53/64 (83%). Males: N = 50 (ELC: 21; NELC: 29); Female: N = 14 (ELC: 2; NELC: 12). Median time to cancer among 23 LD-ELC: 8 m (range: 0-46). Forty-seven gene variants were detected in ELC not found in NELC, of which 27 were pathogenic/likely pathogenic: Frameshift: 8 (1 in NOTCH2, 1 in PTEN, 2 in RB1, 2 in SYNE1 y 2 in SYNE2); Stop-gained: 3 (1 in NOTCH2NL, 2 in SYNE2); Splicing: 3 (1 in RB1, 1 in RIPK4 y 1 in TP53); Missense: 12 (1 in IRF6, 2 in NOTCH1, 1 in RB1, 2 in RIPK4, 6 in SYNE1). Conclusions: LD from pts ELC showed a different mutational profile than LD-NELC. These results show promise for identifying pts at higher risk for developing LC and should be validated in a larger, prospective study.

Novel genetic mutations detected by multigene panel are associated with hereditary colorectal cancer predisposition

Half of the high-risk colorectal cancer families that fulfill the clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome lack germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes and remain unexplained. Genetic testing for hereditary cancers is rapidly evolving due to the introduction of multigene panels, which may identify more mutations than the old screening methods. The aim of this study is the use of a Next Generation Sequencing panel in order to find the genes involved in the cancer predisposition of these families. For this study, 98 patients from these unexplained families were tested with a multigene panel targeting 94 genes involved in cancer predisposition. The mutations found were validated by Sanger sequencing and the segregation was studied when possible. We identified 19 likely pathogenic variants in 18 patients. Out of these, 8 were found in MMR genes (5 in MLH1, 1 in MSH6 and 2 in PMS2). In addition, 11 mutations were detected in other genes, including high penetrance genes (APC, SMAD4 and TP53) and moderate penetrance genes (BRIP1, CHEK2, MUTYH, HNF1A and XPC). Mutations c.1194G>A in SMAD4, c.714_720dup in PMS2, c.2050T>G in MLH1 and c.1635_1636del in MSH6 were novel. In conclusion, the detection of new pathogenic mutations in high and moderate penetrance genes could contribute to the explanation of the heritability of colorectal cancer, changing the individual clinical management. Multigene panel testing is a more effective method to identify germline variants in cancer patients compared to single-gene approaches and should be therefore included in clinical laboratories.