Evaluating cone cut in rectangular collimation in intraoral radiography: application of ALADA and radiation stewardship

OBJECTIVE

Rectangular collimation is a popular method used in intraoral radiography to reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation. One of the perceived drawbacks of rectangular collimation is the possibility of an increase in cone cut errors ultimately impacting the diagnostic value of the radiographs. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the frequency of cone cut errors in radiographs taken using a rectangular collimator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiographs taken using PSP plates at Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam in the Netherlands by staff and students from January to December 2015 were assessed for cone cut errors. The radiographs were grouped as bitewings, front teeth, inferior premolars and molars, and superior premolars and molars and categorized as no cone cut, cone cut but diagnostically usable, and cone cut but diagnostically not usable. The results were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 53,684 radiographs were assessed, 79% had no cone cut errors and consequently 21% had some degree of cone cut. However, the diagnostic value was unaffected in 18% of the radiographs with cone cut. Only 3% of the radiographs were deemed diagnostically unusable due to cone cut. The most common area of cone cut was in the premolar and molar areas while cone cut in the front teeth was least likely to be diagnostically unusable.

CONCLUSION

Cone cut from the use of a rectangular collimator does not seem to result in an increase of diagnostically unusable radiographs. Thus, rectangular collimation should be preferred as it decreases the amount of radiation exposure to the patient while producing diagnostically usable radiographs and thus allowing the dental professional to adhere to the ALADA principle and practice radiation stewardship.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Scientific rationale for the study: rectangular collimation is a method used to reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation; however, this benefit is negligible if radiographs must be retaken due to cone cut errors that make the radiograph diagnostically unusable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the frequency of cone cut in radiographs taken using a rectangular collimator.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

cone cut was observed in 21% of the radiographs; however, only 3% of the radiographs were considered diagnostically unusable.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

rectangular collimation does not result in a high number of diagnostically unusable radiographs and should be used to reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation.

[Portable X-ray devices: technique, image quality and regulations]

Portable intraoral X-ray devices are marketed as an alternative for conventional wall mounted devices. On the basis of a recent clinical trial the diagnostic quality of portables appears to measure up to the conventional devices. When CE-certified portable devices are used with rectangular collimation and a backshatter radiation shield with adapted technique resulting in a beam parallel to the ground, operator exposure stays well within dose limits. However, the dose to the operator is higher than when using conventional devices. Therefore, in the Netherlands, guidelines restrict the use of portable devices to ambulant use outside the dental clinic while deploying additional radiation protection measures. If presumed advantages of increased control over the exposure due to proximity to the patient would be substantiated by research, this restricted use could be reconsidered. Dentists should be aware of online availability of non-CE-certified portable intra-oral X-ray devices that are potentially unsafe.

[Is thyroid shielding recommendable during upper anterior radioagraphy in young patients?]

During intraoral radiography of the upper anterior teeth, the dose the patient is exposed to can be reduced by shielding the thyroid area by using a thyroid shield or collar. However, the dose to the patient is already low and it is questionable whether efforts to reduce this even further are sensible. A cost-utility analysis demonstrated that thyroid shielding is utile when it is used at least 24 times per year for upper anterior exposures in children.

[How to detect opacities in the orofacial soft tissue on a panoramic radiograph: heterotopic ossifications and foreign bodies]

Opacities in the orofacial soft tissue rather than the bone are frequently seen on panoramic radiographs. The differential diagnosis of these opacities is diverse and concerns frequently occurring disorders but also rare ones. Due to the diversity of diagnoses, the clinical interpretation of a soft tissue opacity is often difficult. A distinction is made among heterotopic calcifications, heterotopic ossifications, and foreign bodies. Heterotopic calcifications are subdivided into 3 groups, i.e. dystrophic, idiopathic and metastatic calcifications. In this article, stress is placed on the radiographic and clinical characteristics of heterotopic ossifications and foreign bodies, and how they can be recognised on a panoramic radiograph. Besides this, attention will be paid to the need for possible additional imaging techniques and indications regarding treatment option.

Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed resin graft substitutes mimicking alveolar ridge augmentation: An in vitro pilot study

Recent improvements in additive manufacturing technologies may facilitate the use of customized 3D printed grafts for horizontal and vertical augmentation of the atrophic alveolar ridge. The accurate fit of such grafts could reduce the clinical treatment time and contribute optimal bone regeneration. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of 3D printed resin grafts as they could be used for alveolar ridge augmentation. Alveolar ridge morphologic data were derived from the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of six patients with alveolar bone defects. These data were transferred to a segmentation program to produce virtual 3D reconstructions of the alveolar ridge models. Using a Computer Aided Design (CAD) program, the alveolar bone defects were defined and customized grafts were designed and both the defects as well as the grafts generated (CAM) as 3D projects. These projects were imported into a 3D printer and were manufactured in resin. Hereafter, the grafts were fitted to the defect sites of the corresponding models and new CBCT scans were performed. Based on these scans, measurements were made at the marginal and internal part of the fitted grafts to evaluate the marginal and internal fit, respectively. The statistical analysis revealed that the mean marginal fit was significantly better (P < 0.05) than the mean internal fit. The fit of the grafts was dependent on the shape and on the size of the grafts. Specifically, the total void surface between the fitted graft and the corresponding defect site was significantly larger in the large-defect grafts than the small-defect grafts (P < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study, it could be demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate 3D printed resin grafts with acceptable fit in customized shapes, when combining CBCT scans and computer aided design and 3D printing techniques.

Assessment of Random Error in Phantom Dosimetry with the Use of Error Simulation in Statistical Software

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if software simulation is practical for quantifying random error (RE) in phantom dosimetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We applied software error simulation to an existing dosimetry study. The specifications and the measurement values of this study were brought into the software (R version 3.0.2) together with the algorithm of the calculation of the effective dose (E). Four sources of RE were specified: (1) the calibration factor; (2) the background radiation correction; (3) the read-out process of the dosimeters; and (4) the fluctuation of the X-ray generator.

RESULTS

The amount of RE introduced by these sources was calculated on the basis of the experimental values and the mathematical rules of error propagation. The software repeated the calculations of E multiple times (n = 10,000) while attributing the applicable RE to the experimental values. A distribution of E emerged as a confidence interval around an expected value.

CONCLUSIONS

Credible confidence intervals around E in phantom dose studies can be calculated by using software modelling of the experiment. With credible confidence intervals, the statistical significance of differences between protocols can be substantiated or rejected. This modelling software can also be used for a power analysis when planning phantom dose experiments.

Reducing an already low dental diagnostic X-ray dose: does it make sense? Comparison of three cost-utility analysis methods used to assess two dental dose-reduction measures

OBJECTIVES

To find a method that is suitable for providing an objective assessment of the cost effectiveness of a dose-reducing measure used for diagnostic dental X-ray exposures.

METHODS

Three cost-utility analysis (CUA) methods were evaluated by comparing their assessments of two dose-reduction measures, a rectangular collimator and the combination of two devices that reduce the radiation dose received during orthodontic lateral cephalography. The following CUA methods were used: (1) the alpha value (AV), a monetary valuation of dose reduction used in the nuclear industry; (2) the value of a statistical life for valuation of the reduction in stochastic adverse effects; and (3) the time-for-time method, based on the postulate that risk reduction is effective when the number of years of life gained is more than the years that an average worker must work to earn the costs of the risk-reducing measure. The CUA methods were used to determine the minimum number of uses that was required for the dose-reducing device to be cost effective. The methods were assessed for coherence (are comparable results achieved for comparable countries?) and adaptability (can the method be adjusted for age and gender of specific patient groups?).

RESULTS

The performance of the time-for-time method was superior to the other methods. Both types of dose-reduction devices tested were assessed as cost effective after a realistic number of uses with all three methods except low AVs.

CONCLUSIONS

CUA for the methods of X-ray dose reduction can be performed to determine if investment in low dose reduction is cost effective. The time-for-time method proved to be a coherent and versatile method for performing CUA.

Justification and good practice in using handheld portable dental X-ray equipment: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR)

Handheld portable X-ray devices are increasingly used for intraoral radiography. This development introduces new challenges to staff and patient safety, for which new or revised risk assessments must be made and acted upon prior to use. Major issues might be: difficulties in using rectangular collimation with beam aiming devices, more complex matching of exposure settings to the X-ray receptor used (e.g. longer exposure times), movements owing to the units' weight, protection of the operator and third persons, and the use in uncontrolled environments. These problems may result in violation of the "as low as reasonably achievable'', that is, ALARA principle by an increase in (re)exposures compared with the other available intraoral X-ray devices. Hence, the use of handheld portable X-ray devices should be considered only after careful and documented evaluation (which might be performed based on medical physics support), when there is evidence that handheld operation has benefits over traditional modalities and when no new risks to the operators and/or third parties are caused. It is expected that the use of handheld portable X-ray devices will be very exceptional, and for justified situations only. Special attention should be drawn to beam-aiming devices, rectangular collimation, the section of the X-ray receptor, focus-skin distance, and backscatter shielding, and that the unit delivers reproducible dose over the full set of environmental conditions (e.g. battery status and temperature).

Association between extra- and intracranial calcifications of the internal carotid artery: a CBCT imaging study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the extracranial and intracranial calcification depiction of the internal carotid artery (ICA), incidentally found in CBCT examinations in adults, and to discuss the conspicuous clinical implications.

METHODS

Out of a series of 1085 CBCT examinations, 705 CBCT scans were selected according to pre-defined criteria. The extra- and intracranial calcifications depicted along the course of the ICA were documented according to a comprehensive set of descriptive criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 799 findings were detected, 60.1% (n = 480) were intracranially and 39.9% (n = 319) were extracranially allocated. The χ(2) test showed associations between all variables (p < 0.001). Also, most of the combinations of variables showed statistically significant results in the McNemar's test (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that a significant correlation exists between extra- and intracranial calcifications of the ICA. It is clear that in cases of the presence of a calcification in the ICA extracranially, the artery's intracranial portion has an increased risk of showing the same findings. CBCT imaging is widely used as a diagnostic tool, thus, our results contribute to the identification of a subgroup of patients who should undergo further medical evaluation of the atherosclerosis of the ICAs.

Dose reduction in orthodontic lateral cephalography: dosimetric evaluation of a novel cephalographic thyroid protector (CTP) and anatomical cranial collimation (ACC)

OBJECTIVES

To test the dose-reducing capabilities of a novel thyroid protection device and a recently introduced cranial collimator to be used in orthodontic lateral cephalography.

METHODS

Cephalographic thyroid protector (CTP) was designed to shield the thyroid while leaving the cervical vertebrae depicted. Using a RANDO(®) head phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) equipped with dosemeters and a Proline XC (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) cephalograph, lateral cephalograms were taken, and the effective dose (ED) was calculated for four protocols: (1) without shielding; (2) with CTP; (3) with CTP and anatomical cranial collimator (ACC); and (4) with a thyroid collar (TC).

RESULTS

The ED for the respective protocols was (1) 8.51; (2) 5.39; (3) 3.50; and (4) 4.97 µSv. The organ dose for the thyroid was reduced from 30.17 to 4.50 µSv in Protocols 2 and 3 and to 3.33 µSv in Protocol 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of just the CTP (Protocol 2) resulted in a 36.8% reduction of the ED of a lateral cephalogram. This was comparable to the classical TC (Protocol 4). A 58.8% reduction of the ED was obtained when combining CTP and ACC (Protocol 3). The dose to the radiosensitive thyroid gland was reduced by 85% in Protocols 2 and 3 and by 89% in Protocol 4.

Validation of anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) in orthodontic lateral cephalography

The use of an anatomically shaped cranial collimator (ACC) to reduce patient dose in orthodontic lateral cephalography was investigated in this study. The aim was to evaluate the potential interference of the ACC on landmark identification for orthodontic cephalometry. Consecutive orthodontic patients underwent a total of 100 cephalograms using an ACC mounted on a Veraviewepocs(®) 3D X550 (J. Morita Co., Kyoto, Japan) X-ray unit. 10 observers were asked whether the identification of 5 landmarks close to the collimated area was hindered or rendered impossible by the presence of the collimator. Of the 500 landmarks that were judged by the 10 observers, 496 (99.2%) were reported to lack hindrance. In three landmarks, a minority of the observers reported hindrance. In 1 landmark, 8 of the 10 observers reported hindrance by the collimator. In no instance did the observers state that the identification of landmarks was impossible as a result of the collimation. Application of the ACC on the cephalostat of the X-ray unit is a viable way of reducing patient dose, as it only marginally interferes with the diagnostic yield of the exposure. The need to retake images when the ACC is applied was found to be extremely low.

Anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) for lateral cephalometric radiography: a technical report

Lateral cephalograms in orthodontic practice display an area cranial of the base of the skull that is not required for diagnostic evaluation. Attempts have been made to reduce the radiation dose to the patient using collimators combining the shielding of the areas above the base of the skull and below the mandible. These so-called “wedge-shaped” collimators have not become standard equipment in orthodontic offices, possibly because these collimators were not designed for today's combination panoramic–cephalometric imaging systems. It also may be that the anatomical variability of the area below the mandible makes this area unsuitable for standardized collimation. In addition, a wedge-shaped collimator shields the cervical vertebrae; therefore, assessment of skeletal maturation, which is based on the stage of development of the cervical vertebrae, cannot be performed. In this report, we describe our investigations into constructing a collimator to be attached to the cephalostat and shield the cranial area of the skull, while allowing the visualization of diagnostically relevant structures and markedly reducing the size of the irradiated area. The shape of the area shielded by this “anatomically shaped cranial collimator” (ACC) was based on mean measurements of cephalometric landmarks of 100 orthodontic patients. It appeared that this collimator reduced the area of irradiation by almost one-third without interfering with the imaging system or affecting the quality of the image. Further research is needed to validate the clinical efficacy of the collimator.

Effect of head position on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile

OBJECTIVES

During a cone beam CT scan, the patient is in an upright or supine position. This position depends on the brand and type of the scanner. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate if the head position has an effect on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile, comparing the recordings in natural head position (NHP) and supine head position (SHP) and (2) to investigate if age, gender and body mass index (BMI) are contributing factors to the effect of the head position.

METHODS

90 subjects were photographed in profile both in NHP and in SHP. 12 soft-tissue angular and linear cephalometric values were calculated. Two-way random intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine observer reliability. Paired t-tests and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the differences between the head positions and the influence of age, gender and BMI.

RESULTS

Intraobserver reliability was generally high. Paired t-tests showed significant changes as a result of head positioning (p < 0.0001) in 9 of the 12 measurements. These differences were small and clinically not relevant, except for the "lower face-throat angle". Regression analysis revealed no relevant influence of age, gender and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Cephalometric soft-tissue evaluation from a recording in SHP is generally reliable, except for the throat-chin area where a clinically relevant difference was found. The contour of the submandibular tissues in SHP causes the chin to appear more prominently. This can cause incorrect orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems

AIMS

The aim of this study was to: (1) compare the diagnostic accuracy of the high-resolution and standard resolution settings of four digital imaging systems for caries diagnosis and (2) compare the effect on the diagnostic accuracy of reducing the high-resolution image sizes to the standard resolution dimensions, and vice versa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

90 extracted human premolars were mounted in groups of 5 in plaster blocks, containing 4 test teeth and 1 non-test tooth. Two blocks at a time were placed in a jig to simulate a bitewing radiograph. Radiographs were taken using four digital systems (Planmeca Dixi 2; Gendex Visualix HDI; Dürr Vistascan; Digora Optime), each at two resolution settings. Next, the teeth were sectioned and a total of 65 surfaces were incorporated in the study. Additionally, the bicubic interpolation method was applied to reduce the high-resolution original images and to enlarge the standard resolution images. The original, reduced and enlarged images were randomly shown to five observers in two random sessions. The observers were asked to assess caries depth on a 4-point scale. The observers' scores were compared with the results from a histological examination. Data were analysed using the statistical theory for multivariate discrete data. Cohen's kappa was used to determine the agreement with the gold standard.

RESULTS

None of the comparisons between the spatial resolution settings, or the comparisons between increased or reduced image size and the original image sizes, showed significant differences in the probability of caries detection (chi2=26.59, df=26, P approximately 0.50). The four digital systems used in this study differ significantly in the probability of caries detection (chi2=41.55, df=24, P<0.02). Compared with the gold standard, the Gendex Visualix HDI CCD sensor has the highest measure of agreement (kappa=0.31).

CONCLUSION

Caries diagnosis does not improve when using high-resolution settings compared with the standard settings. The use of bicubic convolution interpolation for zooming has no detectable effect on caries diagnosis and therefore is recommended to use when enlarging or reducing radiographs. The probability of caries detection, however, was different for the sensor systems of the different manufacturers.

Detection of Proximal Caries in vitro Using Standard and Task-Specific Enhanced Images from a Storage Phosphor Plate System

Eight dentists evaluated 72 proximal surfaces of premolars with respect to all caries lesions and to lesions into dentine in digital images from a storage phosphor plate system. The images were processed in four different ways: (1) the default algorithm of the standard imaging system (DF); (2) an algorithm correcting for attenuation and visual response (AV), and two proprietary caries-specific enhancement algorithms (3) K1, and (4) K2, respectively. The lesions were validated by histological examination. There were no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves between differently processed radiographs for the categories of all caries lesions and caries into dentine.

[Digital radiography in young children. Considerations based on experiences in practice]

In dentistry, digital radiology techniques, such as a charge-coupled device and a storage phosphor plate, are gaining popularity. It was the objective of this study to assess the importance of the advantages and disadvantages of digital radiology techniques for bitewing radiography in young children, when compared to conventional film. A group of dentists received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with digital radiology techniques or conventional films among young children. Using the Simple Multi-Attributive Rating Technique (SMART) a final weighted score was calculated for the charge-coupled device, the phosphor plate, and conventional film. The scores were 7.40, 7.38, and 6.98 respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.47). It could be concluded that, on the basis of experiences in practice, there are no statistically significant preferences for the use of digital radioogy techniques for bitewing radiography in young children.

The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the range of diagnostically acceptable digital radiographs and film as a function of exposure time, as well as the relationship to dose reduction and consequences for dental practice.

METHODS

Five systems for intraoral radiography were used to take a series of radiographs, with increasing exposure times, of five different dry bone specimens. Seven observers evaluated the 25 series of radiographs. The observers had to determine which radiographs of each series were acceptable for dental diagnostics and which radiograph of each series they preferred.

RESULTS

For Ektaspeed Plus film, the exposure time for the preferred radiograph was 0.52 s, with a range of diagnostically acceptable radiographs from 0.23-1.02 s. The preferred radiograph of the solid-state systems required less radiation than film (Sirona, 0.13 s; MPDx 0.35 s). The exposure range of these systems is narrow. In contrast, the exposure range of the phosphor plate systems is very wide. The preferred radiograph of the phosphor plate systems required high exposure (Digora, 1.21 s; Gendex DenOptix, 1.16 s).

CONCLUSIONS

All digital systems require less exposure than film for diagnostically acceptable radiographs, but this is less obvious for preferred radiographs. Solid-state systems alert the dentist when a too long exposure time is used by a lack of image quality; phosphor plate systems, however, produce good quality radiographs even at high exposure times, which may result in an unnecessarily high dose.

Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices

OBJECTIVES

To compare the number of radiographs taken in general dental practices equipped with digital radiography vs conventional film-based radiography and to determine the reasons for any difference in numbers.

METHODS

In a mail survey, 473 questionnaires were sent to Dutch General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) using digital radiography and 105 questionnaires were sent to GDPs using film. The questionnaire concerned the number of intraoral radiographs taken in the dental practice, as well as possible reasons to take more or fewer radiographs after conversion to digital radiography.

RESULTS

The response rate was 73%. Users of a phosphor plate system on average take 42.8 radiographs per week and solid-state system users take 48.4 radiographs, whereas film users take on average only 32.5 radiographs per week. The need for more certainty about the planned or ongoing treatment as well as better diagnostics were the most important reasons for taking more radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that GDPs using a system for digital radiography are more inclined to take radiographs than dentists taking conventional radiographs. Although digital intraoral radiography requires 50-80% less radiation per exposure than film, it is likely that the effective dose reduction after converting from conventional to digital radiography is less than 25% owing to the greater numbers of radiographs taken.

A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the experiences of general dental practitioners (GDPs) with solid-state and storage phosphor digital sensors compared to film.

METHODS

In a mail survey 578 questionnaires were sent to Dutch GDPs who were users of digital X-ray detectors and film. The questionnaire requested demographic data, information about the digital system used and the user-friendliness of the X-ray detector system. In the analysis of the data these variables were related to the type of system used and also to the demographic data. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, variance-analysis (One-Way ANOVA) and nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon) (SPSS 9.0).

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-four questionnaires were returned (overall response rate 73%). The user-friendliness of the handling of the different systems before exposing the radiograph is better for conventional film, whereas the handling after exposing the radiograph favoured the digital X-ray detector systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The user-friendliness was best for film pre-exposure and digital sensors post-exposure.