Lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability of extended-release niacin/laropiprant in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia

BACKGROUND

Improving lipids beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering with statin monotherapy may further reduce cardiovascular risk. Niacin has complementary lipid-modifying efficacy to statins and cardiovascular benefit, but is underutilised because of flushing, mediated primarily by prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)). Laropiprant (LRPT), a PGD(2) receptor (DP1) antagonist that reduces niacin-induced flushing has been combined with extended-release niacin (ERN) into a fixed-dose tablet.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Dyslipidaemic patients were randomised to ERN/LRPT 1 g (n = 800), ERN 1 g (n = 543) or placebo (n = 270) for 4 weeks. Doses were doubled (2 tablets/day; i.e. 2 g for active treatments) for 20 weeks. ERN/LRPT 2 g produced significant changes vs. placebo in LDL-C (-18.4%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; 20.0%), LDL-C:HDL-C (-31.2%), non-HDL-C (-19.8%), triglycerides (TG; -25.8%), apolipoprotein (Apo) B (-18.8%), Apo A-I (6.9%), total cholesterol (TC; -8.5%), TC:HDL-C (-23.1%) and lipoprotein(a) (-20.8%) across weeks 12-24. ERN/LRPT produced significantly less flushing than ERN during initiation (week 1) and maintenance (weeks 2-24) for all prespecified flushing end-points (incidence, intensity and discontinuation because of flushing). Except for flushing, ERN/LRPT had a safety/tolerability profile comparable with ERN.

CONCLUSION

Extended-release niacin/LRPT 2 g produced significant, durable improvements in multiple lipid/lipoprotein parameters. The improved tolerability of ERN/LRPT supports a simplified 1 g-->2 g dosing regimen of niacin, a therapy proven to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Long-term efficacy and safety of ezetimibe 10 mg in patients with homozygous sitosterolemia: a 2-year, open-label extension study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term efficacy and safety profile of ezetimibe 10 mg/day in patients with homozygous sitosterolemia.

METHODS

This was an extension of a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled base study in which patients with homozygous sitosterolemia and plasma sitosterol concentrations > 5 mg/dl were randomised 4 : 1 to ezetimibe 10 mg/day (n = 30) or placebo (n = 7) for 8 weeks. Patients who successfully completed the base study with > 80% compliance to study medication were eligible to enter two, successive, 1-year extension studies in which ezetimibe 10 mg/day was administered in an open-label manner. Patients remained on their current treatment regimen (e.g. bile salt-binding resins, statins and low-sterol diet) during the base and extension studies. Patients had to be off ezetimibe therapy for > or = 4 weeks prior to entering the first extension. Efficacy and safety/tolerability parameters were evaluated every 12 and 26 weeks in the first and second years respectively. The primary efficacy end-point was mean percentage change in plasma sitosterol from baseline to study end for the cohort of patients (n = 21) who successfully completed the second extension study.

RESULTS

Treatment with ezetimibe 10 mg/day led to significant mean percentage reductions from baseline in plasma concentrations of sitosterol (-43.9%; p < 0.001), campesterol (-50.8%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) sterols (-13.1%; p < 0.050), total sterols (-10.3%; p < 0.050) and apolipoprotein (apo) B (-10.1%; p < 0.050). No significant changes from baseline were observed for lathosterol, high-density lipoprotein sterol, triglycerides or apo A-1. Maximal reductions in sitosterol and campesterol occurred within the first 52 weeks of treatment and were sustained for the duration of the study. For LDL sterol, total sterols and apo B, maximal reductions were achieved early (by weeks 4 or 16) and waned slightly through the remainder of the study. Overall ezetimibe 10 mg was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In patients with homozygous sitoserolemia, long-term treatment with ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 2 years was effective in reducing plasma plant sterol concentrations with an overall favourable safety and tolerability profile.

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe 40 mg vs. ezetimibe 10 mg in the treatment of patients with homozygous sitosterolaemia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of ezetimibe (EZE) 40 mg/day on non-cholesterol sterol plasma concentrations in patients with homozygous sitosterolaemia (HoS).

METHODS

This was a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study. Twenty-seven patients (> or = 18 years) with HoS and plasma sitosterol levels > 5 mg/dl who had been taking EZE 10 mg/day for > or = 6 months prior to enrolment received open-label EZE 10 mg/day for the duration of the study and were randomised 1 : 1 to blinded EZE 30 mg/day (4 x EZE 10 mg tablets; n = 13) or placebo (1 x EZE 10 mg tablet and 3 x matching placebo tablets; n = 14) for 26 weeks. Patients were permitted to remain on other ongoing treatments (e.g. bile salt-binding resin, statin and/or low sterol diet). End-points included median per cent between-group changes from baseline in plasma sitosterol, campesterol, lathosterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) sterols, LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) measured by gas-liquid chromatography, and Achilles tendon thickness size measured radiographically.

RESULTS

Ezetimibe 40 mg/day resulted in median per cent changes from baseline in plasma sitosterol levels of 3.3% vs. -10% in the EZE 10 mg/day group, in plasma campesterol of -0.5% vs. -9.7% in the EZE 10 mg/day group, and in plasma lathosterol of 0.8% vs. 1.1% in the EZE 10 mg/day group (p = ns for all between-group differences). Median per cent changes in the EZE 40 mg/day and EZE 10 mg/day groups, respectively, were 1.3% and 0% for LDL sterols and 2.5% and 4.4% for LDL-C (p = ns for both between-group differences). At study end-point, Achilles tendon thickness remained unchanged in the EZE 40 mg/day group and increased slightly in the EZE 10 mg/day group (2.2%), yielding a non-significant between-group difference of -2.2%. EZE 40 mg/day was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HoS, treatment with EZE 40 mg/day for 26 weeks was no more effective at reducing plasma plant sterol concentrations vs. EZE 10 mg/day. EZE 40 mg/day had a safety and tolerability profile similar to EZE 10 mg/day.