POS0251 TRANSCRIPTOMIC CHANGES INDUCED BY MAVRILIMUMAB VERSUS TOCILIZUMAB IN EX-VIVO CULTURED ARTERIES FROM PATIENTS WITH GIANT-CELL ARTERITIS

Background

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic disease, and affected patients suffer from relapses and glucocorticoid (GC)-related toxicity. Targeted therapies are emerging with the aim of achieving better disease control and reducing GC exposure. Blocking IL-6 receptor with tocilizumab has been a major advance in the treatment of GCA. However, approximately 40% of patients treated with tocilizumab in combination with GCs experience a flare or tocilizumab-related adverse event. Blocking GM-CSF receptor α with mavrilimumab significantly reduced risk of relapse and improved sustained remission at week 26 vs placebo in a Phase 2 trial. Not all patients satisfactorily respond to any therapy, indicating heterogeneity in leading pathogenic pathways among patients. For these reasons, it is crucial to understand the specific impact of targeted therapies on vascular lesions.

Objectives

In this study we investigated transcriptomic changes induced by tocilizumab or mavrilimumab in ex-vivo cultured arteries from patients with GCA.

Methods

Temporal artery sections obtained for diagnostic purposes from 11 patients with histopathologically-confirmed GCA and 3 controls were cultured ex-vivo and exposed to placebo, mavrilimumab, or tocilizumab (both at 20 µg/mL) for 5 days. Of 11 GCA donors, 2 had received no treatment prior to biopsy, 2 had received a single prednisone (60 mg) dose, 1 had received 2 daily doses, and the remaining 6 had extended treatment; in prednisone-treated patients, mean (SEM) treatment duration was 17.9 ±8.7 days. A separate cohort of patients (consisting of five newly diagnosed patients with GCA, age- and sex-matched with the previous cohort) was used to validate 7 transcripts by real time PCR. Genes were selected for validation based on high level of expression and differential expression with each treatment. All samples were homogenized, and total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent. 100 ng of RNA per sample were processed with Nanostring Inflammation gene expression assay (256 transcripts) and hybridized using nCounter Prep Station. Barcode counts from nCounter Digital Analyzer were processed with nSolver 4.0 Software. Normalised data were analyzed using R Studio 4.0.5 and IBM SPSS 22.0, and paired Wilcoxon tests were applied individually to each treatment comparison group for each analysed gene. One µg of RNA per sample from the validation cohort was retrotranscribed; subsequent real time PCRs were normalised against endogenous control GUSb and analysed using SDS 2.3 software.

Results

67 out of 250 transcripts were differentially expressed between arteries from GCA patients and arteries from control patients (all placebo-treated). Of those, only 9 transcripts remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons, with a false discovery rate ≤0.05. 81 transcripts were differentially expressed in at least one comparison across groups (Figure 1A). 15 transcripts were lower, and 6 were higher in the mavrilimumab group vs placebo; 3 transcripts were lower, and 2 were higher in the tocilizumab group vs placebo. Most changes elicited between treatments were unique, but CXCL-1 was common (Figure 1B). None remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons. The effects of mavrilimumab and tocilizumab on GNAS, CXCL1, IL8, IL2, IRF3, MRC1 and BCL6 expression by Nanostring were consistent with the effect assessed using real time PCR in the separate validation cohort (Figure 1C).

Conclusion

Mavrilimumab and tocilizumab have a different transcriptomic impact on cultured arteries from patients with GCA, with some overlapping effects, although differential effects may have been attenuated by prior GC use. A better understanding of the impact of targeted therapies on vascular inflammation is needed to improve treatment options for patients with GCA.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank: the Genomics core facility of the Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Emily Plummer, PhD, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, for her invaluable contribution.

The study was funded by Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. With support from: Fundació Clínic Barcelona, Fundació Privada Cellex, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Vasculitis Foundation, Marie Curie Actions, and Gobierno de España, Ministerio de Economía, Industria, y Competitividad.

Disclosure of Interests

Marc Corbera-Bellalta: None declared, Farah Kamberovic: None declared, Ferran Araujo: None declared, Roser Alba-Rovira: None declared, Georgina Espigol-Frigole Consultant of: Consulting for Janssen and Hoffmann-La Roche;, Grant/research support from: Meeting attendance support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Marco Alba: None declared, Sergio Prieto-González Speakers bureau: Lecturing for Roche, Grant/research support from: Meeting attendance support from Italfarmo and CSL Behring, José Hernández-Rodríguez Speakers bureau: Lecturing for Novartis, Consultant of: Consulting for Sobi, Grant/research support from: Meeting attendance support from Sobi and Novartis, Patricia Pérez-Galán: None declared, Kent Bondensgaard Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Maria C. Cid Speakers bureau: Educational from GSK and Vifor, Consultant of: Consulting for Janssen, GSK, and Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Research grant from Kiniksa; meeting attendance support from Roche and Kiniksa

AB0358 SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS, RECEPTOR OCCUPANCY, AND SUPPRESSION OF T-CELL-DEPENDENT ANTIBODY RESPONSE IN A PHASE 1 STUDY WITH KPL-404, AN ANTI-CD40 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY

Background

T-cell priming and T-cell-dependent B-cell responses require an intact cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD40L pathway. CD40 is expressed on the surface of B-cells, dendritic cells, antigen-presenting cells, and non-immune cell types; its ligand, CD40L (CD154), is expressed on the surface of activated T-cells, platelets, and other cell types. Blockade of CD40/CD40L interaction has been shown to ablate primary and secondary T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR).

Objectives

We hypothesized that KPL-404, an anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody which inhibits interaction between CD40 and CD40L, would block T-cell dependent, B-cell-mediated autoimmunity in this Phase 1 study in healthy participants.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study of KPL-404 in healthy participants was designed with two single-ascending-dose arms: single intravenous (IV) doses of 0.03 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg and single subcutaneous (SC) doses of 1 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg. The primary objective was safety and tolerability of KPL-404; secondary and exploratory objectives included pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, TDAR inhibition, and receptor occupancy (RO). To evaluate TDAR inhibition, participants post-KPL-404 administration were immunized with 1 mg intramuscular injection of the test antigen Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) on day 4 and day 29 to elicit a primary and secondary Immunoglobulin (Ig) response, respectively. To evaluate RO, free and total CD40 receptor levels (percent change from baseline) on B-cells (whole blood) were measured using flow cytometry.

Results

There were no dose-limiting or dose-related safety findings in healthy participants after KPL-404 administration. One unrelated serious adverse event (patella fracture following a fall) occurred in the 10 mg/kg IV arm. The PK profile of KPL-404 in serum after IV or SC administration had low to moderate variability between individuals; elimination was dose-dependent and consistent with target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) (Figure 1a). For participants receiving 10 mg/kg IV, full receptor occupancy was observed through day 71 (Figure 1b), complete TDAR suppression was observed through Day 57 (Figure 1c), and anti-drug antibodies to KPL-404 were suppressed for at least 57 days; the suppression of antibody responses to the drug itself is an independent indicator of target engagement and pharmacodynamic effect. For participants receiving 5 mg/kg SC, full receptor occupancy was observed through day 43 (Figure 1b), and complete TDAR suppression was observed through Day 29 (Figure 1c). The TDAR response to KLH antigen correlated with the observed full RO.

Conclusion

The safety and tolerability data and the PK/PD profile of KPL-404 support further investigation of KPL-404 in a broad range of autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. These data support the optionality for studying chronic KPL-404 dosing in patients with subcutaneous and/or intravenous administration.

Disclosure of Interests

Manoj Samant Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Alistair Wheeler Consultant of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Guang-Liang Jiang Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Moses Njenga Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Madeline Spiers Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Arian Pano Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp.

AB0379 DOSE-DEPENDENT SUPPRESSION OF T CELL-DEPENDENT ANTIBODY RESPONSE IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS BY KPL-404, AN ANTI-CD40 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY, SUPPORTS CHRONIC DOSING STUDY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

An unmet need remains in patients with failure and/or inadequate response (IR) to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) and/or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi-IR). The CD40/CD40L (CD154) costimulatory pathway is linked to inflammation and joint destruction in RA via production of autoantibodies and inflammatory mediators. KPL-404 is a humanized IgG4 antibody engineered to bind CD40 without triggering Fc effector functions (Muralidharan, 2019), which are known to have been associated with thromboembolic events seen in the first generation of CD40L-targeting therapies.

In a first-in-human Phase 1 single ascending dose study, 52 healthy volunteers received single doses of KPL-404 administered either subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) with no dose-limiting safety findings, infectious episodes, or toxicities (Samant, 2021). The study demonstrated that with 10 mg/kg IV, full receptor occupancy (RO) was observed through day 71, and there was complete suppression of T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR) to keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge on day 1 and re-challenge on day 29 through day 57. With 5 mg/kg SC, full RO was observed through day 43, and there was complete suppression of TDAR through at least day 29. Complete suppression of ADA to KPL-404, an independent indicator of target engagement, was also observed while KPL-404 serum concentrations were above approximately 0.1 to 0.2 µg/mL and continued for at least 50 days and 57 days after 5 mg/kg SC and 10 mg/kg IV administration, respectively.

Objectives

Using Phase 1 and nonclinical data, identify chronic dosing regimens anticipated to yield PK in the sub-therapeutic, therapeutic, and supra-therapeutic ranges to be utilized in a Multiple Ascending Dose Phase 2 Study.

Methods

A PK model was used to simulate multiple dosing scenarios, including: 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg SC qwk, q2wk, and q4wk, as well as 10 mg/kg IV q4wk. The model was used to identify optimal Phase 2 dosing schedules by generating 1000 virtual subjects using the typical parameter estimates with between-subject variability included.

Results

Following SC administration, all subjects were predicted to achieve complete ADA suppression for the full dosing interval at/above 2.5 mg/kg SC q2wk. At 2 mg/kg SC q2wk (starting dose level), simulated steady-state 8-week data predicted PK in a sub-therapeutic range for most subjects and an approximately 31- and 18-fold safety margin relative to preclinical NOAEL dose. At 5 mg/kg SC q2wk, 100% of patients were predicted to be in a therapeutic range, indicating a potential practical efficacious dose level. At 10 mg/kg SC q2wk, 100% of patients were predicted to be in the supratherapeutic range.

These results support a Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Phase 2 study design, with PK lead-in comprised of 3 Cohorts at 2, 5, or 10 mg/kg SC q2wk (each randomized 6:2) and Proof-of-Concept phase (Cohort 4) comprised of 48-60 subjects randomized 1:1:1 to 10 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, and placebo SC q2wk. The ongoing study will evaluate efficacy (Disease Activity of 28 joints using C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP]), safety, PK, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of escalating doses levels of KPL-404 compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe RA (bDMARD-IR or JAKi-IR). The study also allows the flexibility of optional cohorts including additional dosing regimens and/or subpopulations identified based on clinical response and biomarkers.

Conclusion

Inhibition of the CD40-CD154 co-stimulatory interaction holds promise for the management of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases. KPL-404 demonstrated prolonged absorption/excretion capable of suppressing TDAR for extended periods allowing for use of extended dosing intervals irrespective of IV or SC dosing. These analyses supported the design of the ongoing Phase 2 study assessing the efficacy and safety KPL-404 in RA.

References

[1]Muralidharan S et al. 2019. Poster at Keystone Symposia

[2]Samant M et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73(suppl 10)

Disclosure of Interests

Anastassia Papandrikopoulou Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Kiniksa, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Fang Fang Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Alan Kivitz Shareholder of: Amgen, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi,, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Flexion, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Horizon, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Moses Njenga Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Arian Pano Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Costantino Pitzalis Speakers bureau: Abbott/AbbVie, Astra-

Zeneca/MedImmune, BMS, Janssen/J&J, MSD, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech/Chugai, UCB.,, Consultant of: Abbott/AbbVie, Astellas, Astra-Zeneca/MedImmune, BMS, CelGene, Grunenthal, GSK,

Janssen/J&J, Kiniksa, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche / Genentech / Chugai, UCB., Grant/research support from: Abbott/AbbVie, Astellas, Astra-Zeneca/MedImmune, BMS, Janssen/J&J, MSD, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech/Chugai, UCB., Manoj Samant Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Steve Schmitz Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Madeline Spiers Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Eben Tessari Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., John Ziemniak Consultant of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent pericarditis: results from RHAPSODY, a phase 3 study of rilonacept

Background

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) patients report that painful, debilitating flares negatively impact their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RHAPSODY, the Phase 3 trial of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β cytokine trap), included a daily pain diary and patient-reported outcome SF-36v2 to measure HRQoL throughout the trial.

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effect of rilonacept on HRQoL in relation to changes in pain for RP patients who have a recurrence.

Methods

RHAPSODY enrolled 86 patients with acute symptomatic RP to receive weekly rilonacept for a 12-week run-in (RI) period and randomized 61 patients (1:1) to receive placebo (n=31) or continue rilonacept (n=30) for the event-driven randomized-withdrawal (RW) period. Patients on placebo who experienced a qualifying recurrence during RW (return of pericarditis pain and increase in C-reactive protein) were rescued with bailout rilonacept. Patients reported daily pericarditis pain electronically, using a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS), and completed the SF-36v2 at study visits prior to clinician interaction. Scores from RI Baseline (BL), RI Week 12 (RW BL), Recurrence visit, and RW up to Week 24 (or end of study; EOS) were evaluated for patients who experienced recurrence in RW. Analyses exclude one patient randomized to placebo who had a recurrence after Week 24 of the RW period.

Results

Analyses focused on the 22 of 30 patients (73%) in the placebo group who experienced a recurrence before Week 24 of RW (median time from RW BL to recurrence: 8.6 weeks). During RI, daily pain scores decreased while on rilonacept (Cohen's effect size [ES] d=−2.0), and SF-36v2 scores improved, with scores at RI BL (Fig. 1 red line) below the general population average of 50 and near or above average at RI Week 12 (Fig. 1 blue line); ES were all large (d>0.8), ranging from 0.917 (Mental Component Summary) to 2.021 (Bodily Pain). At recurrence, pain scores increased (d=6.5; Fig. 2) and SF-36v2 scores were below the population average (Fig. 1 orange line), with largest reductions between RI Week 12 (RW BL) and recurrence for Bodily Pain (−13.4) and Physical Component Summary (−10.6). Following rilonacept bailout, average pain decreased (d=−2.1; Fig. 2), and by RW Week 24/EOS, SF-36v2 scores returned to similar levels as at the end of the RI period (Fig. 1 green line).

Conclusion

Impaired RI BL SF-36v2 scores indicate negative impact of RP on HRQOL in RP patients. While receiving rilonacept, HRQoL scores improved to near or above population averages, in conjunction with patient-reported pain. After discontinuing rilonacept during RW, HRQoL scores worsened at recurrence and improved upon receipt of bail-out rilonacept, similar to pain. These results provide support for the broader benefit of rilonacept treatment beyond pain, when administered on top of conventional therapies and as mono-therapy, providing evidence of its potential to improve HRQoL in this patient population.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

RESONANCE Registry: rationale and design of the retrospective and prospective longitudinal, observational registry in pediatric and adult patients with recurrent pericarditis

Background

Annually in the United States (US), an estimated 80–90,000 patients are diagnosed with acute pericarditis and 15–30% experience recurrent pericarditis (RP), resulting in increased morbidity and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Treatment options include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. Corticosteroids (CS) are often added to the treatment plan in RP despite CS-associated adverse events and inherent potentiation of recurrence with long-term treatment. A recent Phase 3 clinical trial RHAPSODY (NCT03737110) demonstrated efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin-1 α and β cytokine trap, in patients with RP. RHAPSODY data helped support FDA approval of the first therapy for RP. With the emergence of this targeted therapy, there is increased interest to learn more about this disease with the goal to better inform treatment and management decisions and improve long-term outcomes.

Purpose

RESONANCE Registry aims to evaluate the natural history of RP by collecting retrospective and prospective, longitudinal physician- and patient-reported outcomes data in real-world clinical practice across the US.

Methods

RP patients with active disease (recurrence within 3 years) will have both retrospective and prospective data collected (Figure 1) for as long as their RP is managed up to 5 years. For patients with inactive disease (no recurrence within 3 years), data collection will be retrospective (Figure 2). Up to 500 patients in the US are planned for enrollment at pediatric and adult medical centers, with the potential for expansion to European sites. Additionally, patients will be recruited through a novel, internet-based technology platform and screened for eligibility at a “decentralized” trial site. The registry will include variables obtained from health records, including baseline characteristics and medical history, as well as patient reported outcome (PRO) measures collected every 3 months. The RESONANCE protocol is designed to include a broad population of pediatric and adult patients, regardless of etiology or treatment course, including patients treated with rilonacept. Data will be analyzed to understand disease heterogeneity, variability in treatment and management, and impact on HRQoL. The protocol and Case Report Forms (CRFs) were developed in collaboration with physicians, patients, and patient advocates.

Conclusions

Registries utilize real-world data to fill knowledge gaps in the management of less common diseases such as RP. The RESONANCE Registry is the first RP registry designed to collect data across a broad range of patients regardless of treatment. The registry will also serve as a connection point for physicians to further educate and empower patients with information about their disease. In addition, PRO data may enable greater insights into the understanding of the burden of RP from the patient's perspective.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

AB0370 UTILITY OF CRP AND ESR IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS RELAPSE IN A PHASE 2 TRIAL OF MAVRILIMUMAB

Background:

No universally accepted definition of flare currently exists in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although relapses are defined mostly on clinical grounds (recurrence of GCA-related signs/symptoms), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) help clinicians assess disease activity. In fact, >70% of patients on glucocorticoids (GCs) alone have increased CRP or ESR when the disease is active. In contrast, tocilizumab, given its IL-6-blockade effect in the liver, rapidly reduces CRP and ESR levels, rendering them unreliable for disease activity monitoring. Mavrilimumab – a GM-CSF receptor α inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a Phase 2 GCA trial1 – downregulates inflammation upstream of IL-6. We hypothesized that mavrilimumab would not interfere with the utility of CRP and ESR in monitoring disease activity and in identifying GCA relapse.

Objectives:

To analyze the relationship between CRP/ESR and clinical disease activity in GCA patients treated with mavrilimumab.

Methods:

New-onset and relapsing GCA patients with active disease were recruited. GC-induced remission (no GCA symptoms and CRP <1 mg/dL or ESR <20 mm/hr) was required by baseline. Patients were randomized 3:2 to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks plus a protocol-defined 26-week prednisone taper. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse by Week 26. Relapse (adjudicated) was defined as recurrent GCA-related signs/symptoms, including new/worsening vasculitis on imaging, concurrent with CRP ≥1 mg/dL and/or ESR ≥30 mm/hr. CRP and ESR were also measured periodically during the trial.

This post hoc analysis assessed the association of recurrent GCA-related signs/symptoms with concurrent CRP or ESR elevation post-randomization by treatment arm. We also assessed the proportion of patients with CRP or ESR elevation without GCA-related signs/symptoms up to Week 26.

Results:

Seventy patients were enrolled (mavrilimumab, N=42; placebo, N=28). The association of CRP or ESR elevation with unequivocal GCA-related signs/symptoms post-randomization was consistent regardless of treatment arm: 8/8 in the mavrilimumab group and 13/13 in the placebo group (Table 1). During relapse, median (range) CRP was 1.8 (1.4 – 8.4) mg/dL (mavrilimumab group) and 1.8 (1.1 – 9.0) mg/dL (placebo group). Corresponding ESR values were 39.5 (30 – 102) mm/hr (mavrilimumab group) and 49 (31 – 101) mm/hr (placebo group). Four mavrilimumab recipients had self-limited, equivocal GCA-related signs/symptoms without concurrent CRP or ESR elevation; all 4 completed the prespecified GC taper by Week 26 without need for rescue GCs, so relapse was not confirmed. At least 1 elevated CRP or ESR value in the absence of GCA-related signs/symptoms was observed in 58.8% of mavrilimumab recipients and 93.3% of placebo recipients by Week 26.

Conclusion:

The observed association of CRP or ESR elevation with GCA-related signs/symptoms is consistent with the upstream mechanism and supports the utility of the stringent protocol definition of relapse. The frequency and magnitude of CRP and ESR elevations at relapse were similar in both treatment groups, suggesting that CRP and ESR remain useful in assessments of disease activity in mavrilimumab-treated patients. CRP and ESR elevations without GCA-related signs/symptoms occurred more often in placebo recipients.

References:

[1]Cid, Unizony et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10)

Table 1.

CRP and ESR levels in patients with or without GCA relapse

Assessment§MavrilimumabPlaceboMavrilimumabPlaceboN=42N=28N=42N=28With RelapseWithout Relapse# of patients8 (19.1)13 (46.4)34 (81.0)15 (53.6) Elevated CRP* or ESR†8 (100.0)13 (100.0)20 (58.8)14 (93.3)  Elevated CRP*7 (87.5)10 (76.9)10 (29.4)11 (73.3)   Median (range) mg/dL1.8 (1.4 - 8.4)1.8 (1.1 - 9.0)2.6 (1.3 – 7.0)2.0 (1.0 – 6.6) Elevated ESR†6 (75.0)9 (69.2)16 (47.1)10 (66.7)  Median (range) mm/hr39.5 (30 - 102)49.0 (31 - 101)41.5 (30 - 110)53.5 (30 - 82)

§# (%), except where indicated otherwise.

*CRP ≥ 1 mg/dL

†ESR ≥ 30 mm/hr

Disclosure of Interests:

Sebastian Unizony Consultant of: Janssen and Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: Genentech, Maria C. Cid Speakers bureau: Roche and Kiniksa, Paid instructor for: GSK and Vifor, Consultant of: Janssen, GSK, and Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Kiniksa, Elisabeth Brouwer Speakers bureau: Dr. E.Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017 2018 which were paid to the UMCG., Consultant of: Dr. E.Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017 2018 which were paid to the UMCG., Lorenzo Dagna Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI; clinical trial for Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, Merk Sharp &Dohme, Janssen, Kiniksa, Bhaskar Dasgupta Paid instructor for: Educational grant symposium/workshop for Roche-chugai, Sanofi, and Abbvie, Consultant of: CI UK for the Kiniksa trial, Grant/research support from: Educational grant symposium/workshop for Roche-chugai, Sanofi, and Abbvie, Bernhard Hellmich Consultant of: Honoraria paid to the institution for participation in the clinical trial, Eamonn Molloy: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Bruce C. Trapnell Consultant of: Consultant member of DSMB for Kiniksa., Kenneth J Warrington Consultant of: Clinical trial support from Eli Lilly and Kiniksa, Ian Wicks: None declared, Manoj Samant Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Teresa Zhou Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Lara Pupim Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

LB0001 MAVRILIMUMAB IMPROVES OUTCOMES IN PHASE 2 TRIAL IN NON-MECHANICALLY-VENTILATED PATIENTS WITH SEVERE COVID-19 PNEUMONIA AND SYSTEMIC HYPERINFLAMMATION

Background:

Granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine both vital to lung homeostasis and important in regulating inflammation and autoimmunity1,2,3 that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of respiratory failure and death in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation.4-6 Mavrilimumab is a human anti GM-CSF receptor α monoclonal antibody capable of blocking GM-CSF signaling and downregulating the inflammatory process.

Objectives:

To evaluate the effect of mavrilimumab on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation.

Methods:

This on-going, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled seamless transition Phase 2/3 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. The Phase 2 portion comprised two groups: Cohort 1 patients requiring supplemental oxygen therapy without mechanical ventilation (to maintain SpO2 ≥92%) and Cohort 2 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, initiated ≤48 hours before randomization. Here, we report results for Phase 2, Cohort 1: 116 patients with severe COVID- 19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation from USA, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and South Africa; randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single intravenous administration of mavrilimumab (10 or 6 mg/kg) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients alive and free of mechanical ventilation at Day 29. Secondary endpoints included [1] time to 2-point clinical improvement (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases COVID-19 ordinal scale), [2] time to return to room air, and [3] mortality, all measured through Day 29. The prespecified evidentiary standard was a 2-sided α of 0.2 (not adjusted for multiplicity).

Results:

Baseline demographics were balanced among the intervention groups; patients were racially diverse (43% non-white), had a mean age of 57 years, and 49% were obese (BMI ≥ 30). All patients received the local standard of care: 96% received corticosteroids (including dexamethasone) and 29% received remdesivir. No differences in outcomes were observed between the 10 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg mavrilimumab arms. Results for these groups are presented together. Mavrilimumab recipients had a reduced requirement for mechanical ventilation and improved survival: at day 29, the proportion of patients alive and free of mechanical ventilation was 12.3 percentage points higher with mavrilimumab (86.7% of patients) than placebo (74.4% of patients) (Primary endpoint; p=0.1224). Mavrilimumab recipients experienced a 65% reduction in the risk of mechanical ventilation or death through Day 29 (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.35; p=0.0175). Day 29 mortality was 12.5 percentage points lower in mavrilimumab recipients (8%) compared to placebo (20.5%) (p=0.0718). Mavrilimumab recipients had a 61% reduction in the risk of death through Day 29 (HR= 0.39; p=0.0726). Adverse events occurred less frequently in mavrilimumab recipients compared to placebo, including secondary infections and thrombotic events (known complications of COVID-19). Thrombotic events occurred only in the placebo arm (5/40 [12.5%]).

Conclusion:

In a global, diverse population of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation receiving supplemental oxygen therapy, corticosteroids, and remdesivir, a single infusion of mavrilimumab reduced progression to mechanical ventilation and improved survival. Results indicate mavrilimumab, a potent inhibitor of GM-CSF signaling, may have added clinical benefit on top of the current standard therapy for COVID-19. Of potential importance is that this treatment strategy is mechanistically independent of the specific virus or viral variant.

References:

[1]Trapnell, Nat Rev Dis Pri, 2019

[2]Wicks, Nat Rev Immunology, 2015

[3]Hamilton, Exp Rev Clin Immunol, 2015

[4]De Luca, Lancet Rheumatol, 2020

[5]Cremer, Lancet Rheumatol, 2021

[6]Zhou, Nature, 2020

Disclosure of Interests:

Lara Pupim Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Tisha S. Wang Consultant of: Partner Therapeutics; steering committee for Kinevant BREATHE clinical trial, Kristin Hudock: None declared, Joshua Denson: None declared, Nyda Fourie: None declared, Luis Hercilla Vasquez: None declared, Kleber Luz: None declared, Mohammad Madjid Grant/research support from: Kiniksa, Kirsten McHarry: None declared, José Francisco Saraiva: None declared, Eduardo Tobar: None declared, Teresa Zhou Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Manoj Samant Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Joseph Pirrello Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Fang Fang Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, John F. Paolini Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Arian Pano Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Bruce C. Trapnell: None declared

OP0059 MAVRILIMUMAB (ANTI GM-CSF RECEPTOR Α MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY) REDUCES RISK OF FLARE AND INCREASES SUSTAINED REMISSION IN A PHASE 2 TRIAL OF PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

Background:

T helper (Th)1 and Th17 lymphocytes play a role in the pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Current treatments primarily target the Th17 axis, possibly leaving residual Th1 activity. Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a mediator of Th1 and Th17 cells, is a pathogenic factor in GCA.

Objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the GM-CSF inhibitor mavrilimumab in patients with GCA.

Methods:

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial enrolling patients with active, biopsy- or imaging-proven new onset (N/O) or relapsing refractory (R/R) GCA. Active disease: GCA symptoms and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (>30 mm/hr) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) (≥1 mg/dL) elevation within 6 weeks from randomization. Corticosteroid-induced remission (resolution of GCA symptoms and CRP <1 mg/dL or ESR <20 mm/hr) was required by baseline. 3:2 randomization to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks and protocol-defined 26-week prednisone taper starting at 20-60 mg/day.

Primary efficacy endpoint: time to first adjudicated flare (ESR ≥30 mm/hr and/or CRP ≥1 mg/dL and GCA symptoms or new/worsening vasculitis on imaging) by Week 26 in all treated patients. Key secondary endpoint: sustained remission through Week 26. Safety up to Week 38 was assessed.

Results:

70 patients (35 N/O, 35 R/R) were enrolled (mavrilimumab [N=42] or placebo [N=28]). Mean (SD) age was 69.7 (7.48) years and 71.4% were female. Flare by Week 26 occurred in 8 (19%) and 13 (46.4%) patients receiving mavrilimumab and placebo, respectively (27.4 percentage points reduction). Median time to flare by Week 26 could not be estimated in the mavrilimumab group due to too few events (Not Estimable) and was 25.1 weeks [95% CI: (16.0, NE)] in the placebo group (HR [95% CI] 0.38 [0.15, 0.92]; p=0.0263) (Figure). Sustained remission at Week 26 occurred in 83.2% of patients receiving mavrilimumab and 49.9% of those receiving placebo (33.4 percentage points increase; p=0.0038). Results were consistent across disease type subgroups (HR for flare: N/O 0.29 [95% CI: 0.06, 1.31; nominal p= 0.0873]; R/R 0.43 [95% CI: 0.14, 1.30]; nominal p=0.1231), although not powered for significance (Table). Adverse events (AEs), mostly mild to moderate, were comparable between groups. There were 5 serious AEs (mavrilimumab 2 [4.8%], placebo 3 [10.7%]), none drug-related. No deaths or vision loss occurred. No adjudicated cases of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis were observed.

Table 1.

Efficacy at Week 26

All Patients [1]SubgroupsN/OR/RMavrilimu-mab (N=42)Placebo (N=28)Mavrilimu-mab (N=24)Placebo (N=11)Mavrilimu-mab (N=18)Placebo (N=17)Patients with Flare, n (%)8 (19.0)13 (46.4)3 (12.5)4 (36.4)5 (27.8)9 (52.9)Time to Flare (weeks) [2]Median, 95% CINE (NE, NE)25.1 (16.0, NE)NE (NE, NE)NE (11.7, NE)NE (16.4, NE)22.6 (16.0, NE)HR (Mavrilimumab vs Placebo), 95% CI [3]0.38 (0.15, 0.92)0.29 (0.06, 1.31)0.43 (0.14, 1.30)P-value [4] [5]0.02630.08730.1231Sustained Remission (%), 95% CI [6]83.2 (67.9, 91.6)49.9 (29.6, 67.3)91.3 (69.3, 97.7)62.3 (27.7, 84.0)72.2 (45.6, 87.4)41.7 (17.4, 64.5)Difference in Proportions (95% CI) [7]33.3 (10.7, 55.8)28.9 (-2.7, 60.5)30.6 (-2.1, 63.2)P-value [5] [7]0.00380.07270.0668

NE = Not estimable. [1] Total mITT population. Stratified by randomization strata. [2] Kaplan-Meier. [3] Cox proportional-hazards model; treatment as covariate. [4] Log-rank test. [5] N/O and R/R subgroups not powered for significance; nominal p values reported. [6] Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates with standard error. [7] Two-sided p-value for the difference in sustained remission between 2 arms using normal approximation. Placebo arm is reference.

Conclusion:

Mavrilimumab was superior to placebo on the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints of time to flare and sustained remission at week 26 in patients with GCA. Mavrilimumab was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed.

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria C. Cid Speakers bureau: meeting attendance support from Roche and Kiniksa, Paid instructor for: educational from GSK and Vifor, Consultant of: consulting for Janssen, GSK, and Abbvie, Grant/research support from: research grant from Kiniksa, Sebastian Unizony Consultant of: consulting for Janssen and Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: research support from Genentech, Lara Pupim Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Fang Fang Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Joseph Pirrello Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ai Ren Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Manoj Samant Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Teresa Zhou Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

FRI0010 GM-CSFR PATHWAY IS IMPLICATED IN PATHOGENIC INFLAMMATORY MECHANISMS IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

Background:

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is characterized by inflammation of large and medium arteries. Classic symptoms include headaches, malaise and, in severe cases, blindness and aortic aneurysms. Corticosteroids (CS) are the first line of treatment. Relapsing disease patients undergo multiple courses of CS therapy increasing their CS exposure and toxicity. A significant unmet need for disease-modifying CS-sparing therapy remains in GCA as the efficacy of current treatment options, including tocilizumab have limitations.

We have previously reported elevated expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) pathway transcriptomic signature in GCA vessels. GM-CSF may contribute to underlying disease mechanisms by regulating inflammatory macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs) and T helper (TH1/TH17) cells which are involved in GCA pathogenesis. GM-CSF produced by T cells1can promote polarization of inflammatory macrophages2and recruitment and differentiation of monocytes into inflammatory DCs2that can in turn recruit T cells and stimulate TH1/TH17 differentiation creating a feedback loop. GM-CSF may also exert direct effects on angiogenesis3and vessel wall remodeling4.

Objectives:

To demonstrate the contributing role of GM-CSF pathway to inflammation in GCA arteries.

Methods:

Immunostaining was used to examine expression of GM-CSF and GM-CSF-Rα proteins in temporal artery biopsies (TABs) from GCA and controls (patients with suspected but not confirmed GCA and a negative TAB). Costaining with cell markers such as CD31, CD3, and CD68 allowed visualization of cells expressing GM-CSF and GM-CSF-Rα. Expression of GM-CSF pathway molecules such as phospho-JAK2 and PU.1 proteins was detected by immunohistochemical staining of GCA and control TABs.Ex vivocultured GCA arteries treated (10 each) with mavrilimumab (anti-GM-CSF-Rα) or placebo for 5 days were assayed for gene expression by qPCR, and culture supernatants were analyzed by ELISA.

Results:

Endothelial cells and macrophages were the main cell types expressing GM-CSF and GM-CSF-Rα. Increased expression of phospho-JAK2 (activated signaling molecule) and nuclear-localized PU.1 (transcription factor) in GCA TABs compared to controls indicated the presence of active GM-CSF signaling pathway in GCA.

Inhibition of PU.1 mRNA expression inex vivocultures of GCA arteries treated with mavrilimumab indicated blockade of GM-CSFR signaling pathway. Mavrilimumab induced decrease in mRNA expression of key cell type markers including DC and macrophage activation markers CD83 and HLA-DRA, monocyte markers CD14 and CD16, T cell marker CD3ε, and B cell marker CD20 in these GCA artery cultures. Expression of inflammatory TH1/TH17 factors IFNγ (mRNA), TNFα, CXCL10 (IFNγ-stimulated chemokine) and IL-6 (mRNA and protein) was also inhibited by mavrilimumab in GCA artery cultures.

Conclusion:

Increased GM-CSF, GM-CSF-Rα, and downstream pathway-associated protein levels in GCA biopsies were consistent with previously-observed increased transcriptome signature. Expression of genes associated with inflammatory cells was suppressed by mavrilimumab in cultured GCA arteries. These data implicate the GM-CSF pathway in GCA pathophysiology and increase confidence in rationale for targeting the GM-CSF pathway in GCA.

References:

[1]GM-CSF and T-cell responses: what we do and don’t know. Shiet al., Cell Res 2006

[2]GM-CSF-Dependent Inflammatory Pathways. Hamilton, Front Immunol 2019

[3]GM-CSF increases tumor growth and angiogenesis. Zhenget al., Tumour Biol 2017

[4]GM-CSF deficiency affects vascular elastin production and integrity of elastic lamellae. Weissen-Plenzet al., J Vasc Res 2008

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria C. Cid Grant/research support from: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Consultant of: Janssen, Abbvie, Roche, GSK, Speakers bureau: Vifor, Sujatha Muralidharan Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Employee of: Kiniksa, Marc Corbera-Bellalta: None declared, Georgina Espigol-Frigole Consultant of: Roche and Janssen, Javier Marco Hernandez: None declared, Amanda Denuc: None declared, Roberto Rios-Garces: None declared, Nekane Terrades-Garcia: None declared, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Employee of: Kiniksa, Annalisa D’Andrea Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Employee of: Kiniksa

CO0001 MAVRILIMUMAB IMPROVES OUTCOMES IN SEVERE COVID-19 PNEUMONIA AND SYSTEMIC HYPER-INFLAMMATION

Background:

Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation face increased mortality. There is an urgent need for effective treatments to reduce the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives:

Our protocol aimed at evaluating the potential improvement in clinical outcomes with mavrilimumab, an anti-Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) monoclonal antibody, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyper-inflammation.

Methods:

Single-center, open-label, single active arm intervention; Adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (as evaluated by CT scanning), hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 mmHg), and systemic hyper-inflammation (increased C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 100 mg/mL and/or ferritin ≥ 900 μg/L, increased lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) received a single intravenous dose of mavrilimumab added to standard of care; follow-up 28 days. Main outcomes measure was time to clinical improvement (reduction ≥ 2 categories on the 7-point WHO clinical status scale, 1=discharge, 7=death); others included time to discharge from hospital; % of pts achieving a clinical improvement; survival; mechanical-ventilation free survival; time to fever resolution; CRP; PaO2:FiO2 ratio.

Results:

A mavrilimumab group (n=13 COVID-19 patients, non-mechanically ventilated, median age 57 [IQR, 52-58], males 12 [92%], febrile 11 [85%]; PaO2:FiO2195.5[166.7–215.0]) was compared to a cohort of 26 contemporaneous patients with similar baseline characteristics. Death occurred in 0% (n=0/13) of mavrilimumab recipients and 27% (n=7/26) of comparison-group patients (log rank p=0.046) during the 28-day follow-up. 100% (n=13) of mavrilimumab recipients and 65% (n=17) of comparison-group patients achieved clinical improvement (p=0.018) at Day 28, with earlier improvement (median 8.0 [IQR, 5.0–11.0] days vs 18.5 [11.0–NE] days) (p<0.001) in mavrilimumab recipients. Fever had resolved in 91% (n=10/11 febrile patients) of mavrilimumab recipients by Day 14, compared to 61% (n=11/18 febrile) of patients in the comparison group (p=0.110); fever resolution was faster in mavrilimumab recipients versus controls (median 1.0 [IQR, 1.0–2.0] day vs 7.0 [3.0 - NE] days, respectively, p=0·009). Mavrilimumab was well tolerated in all patients.

Conclusion:

Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyper-inflammation who received treatment with mavrilimumab had better clinical outcomes compared to patients receiving routine care. Mavrilimumab was well-tolerated. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

References:

[1]Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-62

[2]Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033-4

Disclosure of Interests:

Giacomo De Luca Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, MSD, Giulio Cavalli Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Pfizer, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Emanuel Della Torre: None declared, Piera Angelillo: None declared, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, nicola boffini: None declared, Stefano Tentori: None declared, Francesca Mette: None declared, Patrizia Rovere-Querini: None declared, Annalisa Ruggeri: None declared, Teresa D’Aliberti: None declared, Paolo Scarpelllini: None declared, Giovanni Landoni: None declared, Francesco De Cobelli: None declared, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Employee of: Kiniksa, Alberto Zangrillo: None declared, Moreno Tresoldi: None declared, Bruce C. Trapnell Consultant of: Kiniksa, Fabio Ciceri: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOBI

P3349RHAPSODY: a pivotal phase 3 trial to assess efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin 1 alpha and beta blocker, in patients with recurrent pericarditis

Background

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is managed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), and colchicine; up to 15% of pericarditis patients experience multiple recurrences. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) is an important cytokine in the pathophysiology of RP. Rilonacept (KPL-914) is a recombinant fusion protein which binds IL-1α and IL-1β. An ongoing Phase 2 study of rilonacept demonstrated improvements in RP symptoms and inflammation.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) rilonacept in patients with RP in a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods

RHAPSODY is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial; ∼50 patients will be enrolled (Figure). Patients (≥12 y) must present with at least a third pericarditis episode (all etiologies except infectious and malignant) characterized by a pain score ≥4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1 mg/dL at screening. Patients may be receiving stable doses of analgesics, NSAIDs, colchicine, and/or CS. After a loading dose (320 mg SC in adults and 4.4 mg/kg SC in children), all patients will receive weekly rilonacept (160 mg SC in adults and 2.2 mg/kg SC in children) during the run-in period. Patients able to taper and discontinue concomitant pericarditis medications and achieve clinical response (mean daily NRS score ≤2.0 during the 7 days before randomization and CRP level ≤0.5 mg/dL) will be randomized 1:1 in a blinded fashion to continued rilonacept or matching placebo weekly SC injections. Investigators may choose different treatments for pericarditis recurrences based on patient clinical status, including bailout rilonacept, while maintaining the blind to prior treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to pericarditis recurrence (adjudicated by an independent committee) in the randomized-withdrawal portion of the study. Secondary efficacy endpoints are the proportion of patients maintaining a clinical response, percentage of days with NRS pain score ≤1, and percentage of patients with no-to-minimal pericarditis symptoms based on patient global assessment. Safety evaluations include adverse events monitoring, physical examinations, and laboratory tests.

Figure 1

Conclusions

RHAPSODY is a pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilonacept in patients with RP using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal design. The results of this study may inform the management of RP.

Acknowledgement/Funding

This study is sponsored by Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Efficacy and safety of extended-release niacin/laropiprant plus statin vs. doubling the dose of statin in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia

BACKGROUND

Co-administration of niacin with statin offers the potential for additional lipid management and cardiovascular risk reduction. However, niacin is underutilised because of the side effects of flushing, mediated primarily by prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)). A combination tablet containing extended-release niacin and laropiprant (ERN/LRPT), a PGD(2) receptor (DP1) antagonist, offers improved tolerability. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ERN/LRPT added to statin vs. doubling the dose of statin in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia who were not at their National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal based on their coronary heart disease risk category (high, moderate or low).

METHODS

After a 2- to 6-week run-in statin (simvastatin 10 or 20 mg or atorvastatin 10 mg) period, 1216 patients were randomised equally to one of two treatment groups in a double-blind fashion: group 1 received ERN/LRPT (1 g) plus the run-in statin dose and advanced to ERN/LRPT (2 g) after 4 weeks for an additional 8 weeks, with no adjustments to the run-in statin dose; group 2 received simvastatin or atorvastatin at twice their run-in statin dose and remained on this stable dose for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

ERN/LRPT added to statin (pooled across statin and statin dose) significantly improved key lipid parameters vs. the doubled statin dose (pooled): the between-treatment group difference in least squares mean per cent change [95% confidence interval (CI)] from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C (primary end-point) was -4.5% (-7.7, -1.3) and in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was 15.6% (13.4, 17.9) and in median per cent change for triglyceride (TG) was -15.4% (-19.2, -11.7). Treatment-related adverse experiences (AEs) related to flushing, pruritis, rash, gastrointestinal upset and elevations in liver transaminases and fasting serum glucose occurred more frequently with ERN/LRPT added to statin vs. statin dose doubled.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ERN/LRPT to ongoing statin treatment produced significantly improved lipid-modifying benefits on LDL-C, HDL-C and TG and all other lipid parameters compared with doubling the statin dose in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. The types of AEs that occurred at a greater frequency in the ERN/LRPT group were those typically associated with niacin.

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of two different formulations of extended-release niacin

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic parameters of niacin extended-release tablets (NER uncoated) and niacin extended-release caplet formation (NER coated).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-five healthy male and female subjects were enrolled in a four-period, open-label, randomized, crossover study. Both NER uncoated and NER coated were given as 1 x 1000 mg or 2 x 500 mg tablets. Similarity of NER coated 1 x 1000 mg and NER uncoated 2 x 500 mg was declared if 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for nicotinuric acid (NUA) Cmax fell within the pre-specified bounds of [0.7, 1.43].

RESULTS

The GMRs for NUA Cmax demonstrated similarity in the pharmacokinetics of NER uncoated 2 x 500 mg, NER coated 1 x 1000 mg, and NER coated 2 x 500 mg. Although less stringent comparability bounds were prespecified for the primary pharmacokinetic endpoint (i.e., Cmax of plasma NUA), inspection of the primary comparison of interest indicated that a hypothesis with more stringent bioequivalence bounds of [0.8, 1.25] would have been satisfied. The NUA Cmax for NER uncoated 1 x 1000 mg was approximately 40% higher than that seen for the other three treatments. In contrast, total urinary excretion of niacin and its metabolites, an approximate measure of bioavailability, was similar for all four treatments.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic profile of the original NER uncoated formulation dosed as 2 x 500 mg was similar to the new film-coated formulation, NER coated, dosed as 1 x 1000 mg.

Lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability of extended-release niacin/laropiprant in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia

BACKGROUND

Improving lipids beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering with statin monotherapy may further reduce cardiovascular risk. Niacin has complementary lipid-modifying efficacy to statins and cardiovascular benefit, but is underutilised because of flushing, mediated primarily by prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)). Laropiprant (LRPT), a PGD(2) receptor (DP1) antagonist that reduces niacin-induced flushing has been combined with extended-release niacin (ERN) into a fixed-dose tablet.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Dyslipidaemic patients were randomised to ERN/LRPT 1 g (n = 800), ERN 1 g (n = 543) or placebo (n = 270) for 4 weeks. Doses were doubled (2 tablets/day; i.e. 2 g for active treatments) for 20 weeks. ERN/LRPT 2 g produced significant changes vs. placebo in LDL-C (-18.4%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; 20.0%), LDL-C:HDL-C (-31.2%), non-HDL-C (-19.8%), triglycerides (TG; -25.8%), apolipoprotein (Apo) B (-18.8%), Apo A-I (6.9%), total cholesterol (TC; -8.5%), TC:HDL-C (-23.1%) and lipoprotein(a) (-20.8%) across weeks 12-24. ERN/LRPT produced significantly less flushing than ERN during initiation (week 1) and maintenance (weeks 2-24) for all prespecified flushing end-points (incidence, intensity and discontinuation because of flushing). Except for flushing, ERN/LRPT had a safety/tolerability profile comparable with ERN.

CONCLUSION

Extended-release niacin/LRPT 2 g produced significant, durable improvements in multiple lipid/lipoprotein parameters. The improved tolerability of ERN/LRPT supports a simplified 1 g-->2 g dosing regimen of niacin, a therapy proven to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Measuring flushing symptoms with extended-release niacin using the flushing symptom questionnaire: results from a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Niacin is underutilised because of flushing. Lack of a quantitative tool to assess niacin-induced flushing has precluded the objective evaluation of flushing associated with extended-release (ER) niacin formulations. We developed the Flushing Symptom Questionnaire((c)) (FSQ), a quantitative tool to assess patient-reported flushing, and assessed its ability to characterise ER niacin-induced flushing.

METHODS

This study focused on the responses to one question in the FSQ, the Global Flushing Severity Score (GFSS), reported on a 0-10 scale (none = 0, mild = 1-3, moderate = 4-6, severe = 7-9 and extreme = 10) to assess flushing during ER niacin initiation (week 1) and maintenance (weeks 2-8).

RESULTS

Flushing severity with ER niacin was greatest during week 1 and remained greater than placebo for the study duration. During weeks 2-8, 40% of patients on ER niacin vs. 8% of those on placebo had > 1 day/week with 'moderate or greater' GFSS.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the GFSS component of the FSQ was a sensitive and responsive quantitative measure of ER niacin-induced flushing that will aid in the objective comparison of novel strategies intended to improve tolerability and adherence to niacin, an agent proven to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Bioequivalence of an ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet and coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin as separate tablets in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

To assess the bioequivalence of an ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) combination tablet compared to the coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin as separate tablets (EZE + SIMVA).

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, 2-part, 2-period crossover study, 96 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to participate in each part of the study (Part I or II), with each part consisting of 2 single-dose treatment periods separated by a 14-day washout. Part I consisted of Treatments A (EZE 10 mg + SIMVA 10 mg) and B (EZE/SIMVA 10/10 mg/mg) and Part II consisted of Treatments C (EZE 10 mg + SIMVA 80 mg) and D (EZE/SIMVA 10/80 mg/mg). Blood samples were collected up to 96 hours post-dose for determination of ezetimibe, total ezetimibe (ezetimibe + ezetimibe glucuronide), simvastatin and simvastatin acid (the most prevalent active metabolite of simvastatin) concentrations. Ezetimibe and simvastatin acid AUC(0-last) were predefined as primary endpoints and ezetimibe and simvastatin acid Cmax were secondary endpoints. Bioequivalence was achieved if 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) (single tablet/coadministration) of AUC(0-last) and Cmax fell within prespecified bounds of (0.80, 1.25).

RESULTS

The GMRs of the AUC(0-last) and Cmax for ezetimibe and simvastatin acid fell within the bioequivalence limits (0.80, 1.25). EZE/ SIMVA and EZE + SIMVA were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The lowest and highest dosage strengths of EZE/SIMVA tablet were bioequivalent to the individual drug components administered together. Given the exact weight multiples of the EZE/SIMVA tablet and linear pharmacokinetics of simvastatin across the marketed dose range, bioequivalence of the intermediate tablet strengths (EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg/mg and EZE/SIMVA 10/40 mg/mg) was inferred, although these dosages were not tested directly. These results indicate that the safety and efficacy profile of EZE + SIMVA coadministration therapy can be applied to treatment with the EZE/SIMVA tablet across the clinical dose range.

The chemokines IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and I-309 are monomers at physiologically relevant concentrations

The chemokines are a family of immune mediators involved in a wide range of inflammatory processes, most importantly as chemoattractants of monocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts to sites of inflammation. Nuclear magnetic resonance and x-ray crystallographic studies have shown that IL-8 and macrophage-inflammatory protein-1 beta (MIP-1 beta) form noncovalent dimers and that platelet factor-4 (PF-4) forms noncovalent dimers and tetramers, leading to the assumption that, as a family, the chemokines would form multimeric structures. In this study, we analyze the association states of the chemokines IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and I-309, by using a combination of size exclusion HPLC, sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation, and chemical cross-linking. We find that the association states of MCP-1 and IL-8 are characterized by an equilibrium between monomers and dimers: although dimers predominate at concentrations above 100 microM, these chemokines are almost exclusively monomeric at the nanomolar concentrations at which they display maximal chemotactic activity. I-309, by contrast, remains a monomer at all concentrations tested. I-309 contains two additional cysteine residues (C26 and C68) that are not found in any other members of the chemokine family. We used cyanogen bromide and trypsin digestion strategies to demonstrate that these two residues are linked in a unique intramolecular disulfide bond. Furthermore, by using site-directed mutagenesis, we show that the integrity of this bond is crucial for protein secretion.

The chemokines IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and I-309 are monomers at physiologically relevant concentrations

The chemokines are a family of immune mediators involved in a wide range of inflammatory processes, most importantly as chemoattractants of monocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts to sites of inflammation. Nuclear magnetic resonance and x-ray crystallographic studies have shown that IL-8 and macrophage-inflammatory protein-1 beta (MIP-1 beta) form noncovalent dimers and that platelet factor-4 (PF-4) forms noncovalent dimers and tetramers, leading to the assumption that, as a family, the chemokines would form multimeric structures. In this study, we analyze the association states of the chemokines IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and I-309, by using a combination of size exclusion HPLC, sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation, and chemical cross-linking. We find that the association states of MCP-1 and IL-8 are characterized by an equilibrium between monomers and dimers: although dimers predominate at concentrations above 100 microM, these chemokines are almost exclusively monomeric at the nanomolar concentrations at which they display maximal chemotactic activity. I-309, by contrast, remains a monomer at all concentrations tested. I-309 contains two additional cysteine residues (C26 and C68) that are not found in any other members of the chemokine family. We used cyanogen bromide and trypsin digestion strategies to demonstrate that these two residues are linked in a unique intramolecular disulfide bond. Furthermore, by using site-directed mutagenesis, we show that the integrity of this bond is crucial for protein secretion.

Cardiac ejection fraction: phantom study comparing cine MR imaging, radionuclide blood pool imaging, and ventriculography

The accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac ejection fraction (EF) measurements based on cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, radionuclide multigated acquisition (MUGA) blood pool imaging, and angiographic ventriculography were evaluated by comparing them with a volumetrically determined standard. A biventricular, compliant, fluid-filled heart phantom was developed to mimic normal cardiac anatomy and physiology. Ventricular EFs were measured with cine MR imaging by summation of nine contiguous 10-mm-thick sections in short and long axis, with single-plane ventriculography, and with MUGA. Three measurements were performed with each modality for each of three EFs. Ventriculography was least accurate, with average relative errors ranging from 7.9% for the largest EF to 60.1% for the smallest. Cine MR was most accurate, with average relative errors ranging from 4.4% to 8.5%. MUGA EF measurements showed good correlation, with average relative errors ranging from 7.1% to 22.4%. Comparison of the error variances for the three modalities with the F test revealed that MR and MUGA EF measurements were significantly more accurate than those based on ventriculography (P less than .01). No significant difference was demonstrated between the accuracy of short- and long-axis cine MR acquisitions.

Characterization of a novel human corneal endothelial antigen

The antigenic composition of the human corneal endothelium, a cellular layer essential for maintaining corneal function, has not been well characterized. A novel corneal endothelial antigen was identified by generating a monoclonal antibody (MAb) against normal human corneal endothelial cells. This MAb, designated 2B4.14.1, reacted strongly by immunoperoxidase staining with the endothelium of corneas from all human donors tested but not with other corneal components, including epithelium and stroma. Positive immunohistologic reactions of 2B4.14.1 with several other human tissues, including kidney (parietal epithelium of Bowman's capsule, proximal convoluted tubule, ascending limb of Henle's loop, and distal convoluted tubule), glandular epithelia of numerous organs, and mesothelial linings of several thoracic and abdominal viscera, also were observed. One of the renal antigens recognized by 2B4.14.1 was identified as Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein (THGP), based on the ability of the antibody to recognize THGP in western immunoblots and the abrogation of immunohistologic reactivity of the antibody by preincubation with purified THGP. These findings raise the possibility that the human cornea expresses a molecule with homeostatic properties similar to those ascribed to THGP. However, it is unlikely that the corneal antigen recognized by 2B4.14.1 is conventional THGP; a MAb specific for THGP did not react with corneal endothelium.