Health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent pericarditis: results from RHAPSODY, a phase 3 study of rilonacept

Background

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) patients report that painful, debilitating flares negatively impact their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RHAPSODY, the Phase 3 trial of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β cytokine trap), included a daily pain diary and patient-reported outcome SF-36v2 to measure HRQoL throughout the trial.

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effect of rilonacept on HRQoL in relation to changes in pain for RP patients who have a recurrence.

Methods

RHAPSODY enrolled 86 patients with acute symptomatic RP to receive weekly rilonacept for a 12-week run-in (RI) period and randomized 61 patients (1:1) to receive placebo (n=31) or continue rilonacept (n=30) for the event-driven randomized-withdrawal (RW) period. Patients on placebo who experienced a qualifying recurrence during RW (return of pericarditis pain and increase in C-reactive protein) were rescued with bailout rilonacept. Patients reported daily pericarditis pain electronically, using a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS), and completed the SF-36v2 at study visits prior to clinician interaction. Scores from RI Baseline (BL), RI Week 12 (RW BL), Recurrence visit, and RW up to Week 24 (or end of study; EOS) were evaluated for patients who experienced recurrence in RW. Analyses exclude one patient randomized to placebo who had a recurrence after Week 24 of the RW period.

Results

Analyses focused on the 22 of 30 patients (73%) in the placebo group who experienced a recurrence before Week 24 of RW (median time from RW BL to recurrence: 8.6 weeks). During RI, daily pain scores decreased while on rilonacept (Cohen's effect size [ES] d=−2.0), and SF-36v2 scores improved, with scores at RI BL (Fig. 1 red line) below the general population average of 50 and near or above average at RI Week 12 (Fig. 1 blue line); ES were all large (d>0.8), ranging from 0.917 (Mental Component Summary) to 2.021 (Bodily Pain). At recurrence, pain scores increased (d=6.5; Fig. 2) and SF-36v2 scores were below the population average (Fig. 1 orange line), with largest reductions between RI Week 12 (RW BL) and recurrence for Bodily Pain (−13.4) and Physical Component Summary (−10.6). Following rilonacept bailout, average pain decreased (d=−2.1; Fig. 2), and by RW Week 24/EOS, SF-36v2 scores returned to similar levels as at the end of the RI period (Fig. 1 green line).

Conclusion

Impaired RI BL SF-36v2 scores indicate negative impact of RP on HRQOL in RP patients. While receiving rilonacept, HRQoL scores improved to near or above population averages, in conjunction with patient-reported pain. After discontinuing rilonacept during RW, HRQoL scores worsened at recurrence and improved upon receipt of bail-out rilonacept, similar to pain. These results provide support for the broader benefit of rilonacept treatment beyond pain, when administered on top of conventional therapies and as mono-therapy, providing evidence of its potential to improve HRQoL in this patient population.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Anti-interleukin 1 agents for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis

Background

Corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a challenging management problem, in which conventional anti-inflammatory therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, corticosteroids) is unable to control the disease. Recent data suggest a potential role for anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) agents for this condition.

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-IL-1 agents in this setting.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies assessing pericarditis recurrences and drug-related adverse events in patients receiving anti-IL-1 drugs for pericarditis.

Results

The meta-analysis assessed 7 studies including 397 pooled patients with RP. The median age was 42 years, 60% were women and the aetiology was idiopathic in 87%. After a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR,12–39), patients receiving anti-IL-1 agents (anakinra or rilonacept) had a significantly reduction in pericarditis recurrences (incidence rate ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.14, see figure), compared with placebo and/or standard medical therapy. Anti-IL-1 agents were associated with increased risk of adverse events compared with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 5.38, 95% CI 2.08 to 13.92): injection-site reactions occurred in 15/41 (36.6%) vs. none (RR 14.98, 95% CI 2.09 to 107.09), infections occurred in 13/51 (25.5%) vs. 3/41 (7.3%; RR 3.65, 95% CI 1.23 to 10.85). Anti-IL-1 agents were not associated with increased risk of severe adverse events.

Conclusions

In patients with RP, anti-IL-1 agents (anakinra and rilonacept) are efficacious for prevention of recurrences, without severe adverse events.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life of patients with recurrent pericarditis in the United States: findings from a patient survey

Background

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is characterized by recurrence of symptoms of pericarditis after the original episode has ceased for 4–6 weeks. Though RP is associated with significant morbidity, there is little information regarding the impact of RP on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Purpose

To describe clinical characteristics of and HRQOL burden in patients with RP in the United States.

Methods

An IRB-approved web-based survey was conducted among patients ≥18 years old with RP who experienced ≥1 recurrence during the prior 12 months. Respondents were recruited from the RHAPSODY clinical trial recruitment database. Patients who met the survey inclusion criteria were asked to provide information on their demographic/clinical characteristics, treatments for RP, and to complete an 11-point pericarditis pain numerical rating scale, the Patient Global Impression of Pericarditis Severity scale, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Global Health and Sleep Disturbance scales, and questions about the impact of RP on daily life.

Results

Of the 83 respondents with RP included in the study, 25% responded while experiencing a recurrence. Most respondents were Caucasian (76%) and 55% were female, with mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 49.3 (13.7) years. Patients frequently reported history of hypertension (39%), anxiety (37%), and depression (34%); 16% and 15% of patients reported having pre-existing autoimmune disease and diabetes, respectively. About half (49%) of patients reported ≥3 recurrences in the prior year, and 40% visited the ER and 25% were hospitalized for their most recent recurrence. Among patients not actively experiencing a recurrence, 37% reported that the duration of their prior episode lasted ≥8 days. Medications most frequently used for RP and pain in the prior year included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (82%), colchicine (63%), and corticosteroids (29%). Commonly reported symptoms included chest pain (93%), shortness of breath (66%), weakness/fatigue (64%), and heart palpitations (52%). Two-thirds of patients rated the severity of symptoms during the most recent RP episode as moderately severe to very severe, and 48% reported “quite a bit” or “very much” fear of pericarditis recurrence. The mean (SD) value for worst pericarditis pain (0–10 scale) during the recent recurrence was 6.1 (2.3), with 48% reporting severe pain (≥7 on the scale). Patients had substantially worse mean [SD] T scores for PROMIS physical health (37.6 [8.6]), mental health (42.8 [9.9]), and sleep disturbance (60.6 [8.3]) than the general population (50 [10]).

Conclusions

RP is a burden on the daily lives of patients, resulting in severe pain and impaired quality-of-life including poor physical and mental health, sleep disturbance, and fear of recurrence. This study demonstrates the unmet need for therapies that can rapidly resolve symptoms and prevent recurrences.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp.

P3349RHAPSODY: a pivotal phase 3 trial to assess efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin 1 alpha and beta blocker, in patients with recurrent pericarditis

Background

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is managed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), and colchicine; up to 15% of pericarditis patients experience multiple recurrences. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) is an important cytokine in the pathophysiology of RP. Rilonacept (KPL-914) is a recombinant fusion protein which binds IL-1α and IL-1β. An ongoing Phase 2 study of rilonacept demonstrated improvements in RP symptoms and inflammation.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) rilonacept in patients with RP in a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods

RHAPSODY is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial; ∼50 patients will be enrolled (Figure). Patients (≥12 y) must present with at least a third pericarditis episode (all etiologies except infectious and malignant) characterized by a pain score ≥4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1 mg/dL at screening. Patients may be receiving stable doses of analgesics, NSAIDs, colchicine, and/or CS. After a loading dose (320 mg SC in adults and 4.4 mg/kg SC in children), all patients will receive weekly rilonacept (160 mg SC in adults and 2.2 mg/kg SC in children) during the run-in period. Patients able to taper and discontinue concomitant pericarditis medications and achieve clinical response (mean daily NRS score ≤2.0 during the 7 days before randomization and CRP level ≤0.5 mg/dL) will be randomized 1:1 in a blinded fashion to continued rilonacept or matching placebo weekly SC injections. Investigators may choose different treatments for pericarditis recurrences based on patient clinical status, including bailout rilonacept, while maintaining the blind to prior treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to pericarditis recurrence (adjudicated by an independent committee) in the randomized-withdrawal portion of the study. Secondary efficacy endpoints are the proportion of patients maintaining a clinical response, percentage of days with NRS pain score ≤1, and percentage of patients with no-to-minimal pericarditis symptoms based on patient global assessment. Safety evaluations include adverse events monitoring, physical examinations, and laboratory tests.

Figure 1

Conclusions

RHAPSODY is a pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilonacept in patients with RP using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal design. The results of this study may inform the management of RP.

Acknowledgement/Funding

This study is sponsored by Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Therapists and the rehabilitation process after stroke

Therapists working in an experimental stroke unit were interviewed about how they set goals for rehabilitation, how they measure progress, and about problems of discharging patients. In addition the interview covered the topics of quality in rehabilitation, the relationship between patient and therapist, and therapists' evaluation of the stroke unit. The therapists felt that current outcome measurement instruments did not capture the kinds of results that they felt were important. They were process-oriented, and not only outcome-oriented as in traditional studies of stroke rehabilitation. This explorative study provides an insight into how therapists view the stroke rehabilitation process, and elaborates themes for future studies of physical and occupational therapy in rehabilitation.

Patients' experience of rehabilitation after stroke

In this study patients were interviewed concerning their experience of rehabilitation in an experimental stroke unit. The patients reported positive effects of being together with other stroke patients and used the unit in a self-help group fashion. They felt that they could have used more rehabilitation, even though they were hospitalized for longer than reported in other studies. Patients felt that there were important non-physical problems in connection with their rehabilitation, and that sufficient attention was not given to all of these. Finally patients underlined the positive effects of the rehabilitation process in helping them organize their coming life in the community.

Self-reported health and function status of elderly Turkish immigrants in Copenhagen, Denmark

This study analyses the self-reported health and functional status of elderly Turkish immigrants in Copenhagen. One hundred and sixteen Turkish immigrants aged 55 and over were interviewed at home about their health problems and their ability to perform a number of daily activities. Only one-third of the respondents reported having no chronic illness, while chronic arthritis was the one mentioned most frequently (41%). Almost 2/3 of the respondents reported having pains in their locomotor systems. Women are overrepresented, but the differences are not statistically significant. As regards the 11 daily activities in the questionnaire, only 39 of the respondents reported being able to perform all of them without difficulty. The article suggests some possible explanations for the results and suggests future areas for research.