Oral macrophage-like cells play a key role in tolerance induction following sublingual immunotherapy of asthmatic mice

Sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) is a safe and efficacious treatment for type 1 respiratory allergies. Herein, we investigated the key subset(s) of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) involved in antigen/allergen capture and tolerance induction during SLIT. Following sublingual administration, fluorochrome-labeled ovalbumin (OVA) is predominantly captured by oral CD11b⁺CD11c⁻ cells that migrate to cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) and present the antigen to naive CD4⁺ T cells. Conditional depletion with diphtheria toxin of CD11b⁺, but not CD11c⁺ cells, in oral tissues impairs CD4⁺ T-cell priming in CLNs. In mice with established asthma to OVA, specific targeting of the antigen to oral CD11b⁺ cells using the adenylate cyclase vector system reduces airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophil recruitment in bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs), and specific Th2 responses in CLNs and lungs. Oral CD11b⁺CD11c⁻ cells resemble tolerogenic macrophages found in the lamina propria (LP) of the small intestine in that they express the mannose receptor CD206, as well as class-2 retinaldehyde dehydrogenase (RALDH2), and they support the differentiation of interferon-γ/interleukin-10 (IFNγ/IL-10)-producing Foxp3⁺ CD4⁺ regulatory T cells. Thus, among the various APC subsets present in oral tissues of mice, macrophage-like cells play a key role in tolerance induction following SLIT.

HLA-A*0201-restricted cytolytic responses to the rtTA transactivator dominant and cryptic epitopes compromise transgene expression induced by the tetracycline on system

The tetracycline-controlled transcription system (Tet-on) is widely used to regulate gene expression in mammalian cells. In gene therapy applications, immune responses to Tet-on proteins such as the rtTA transcription factor have been reported, raising concerns about their occurrence in humans. To monitor the HLA class I cytolytic responses against Tet-on regulators, we characterized the immunogenic CD8+ epitopes within rtTA and tTS regulators using HLA-A*0201 class I transgenic mice. Epitope prediction programs, HLA-A*0201 binding assays, and peptide immunization were used to select a set of immunogenic peptides within rtTA and tTS sequences. To identify further the rejection epitopes, we expressed Tet-on protein components in vivo and found a single dominant rtTA186 CTL epitope in the rtTA tetracycline repressor domain. Target cells expressing rtTA were susceptible to CTL lysis, and rtTA expression compromised muscle transgene engraftment. To reduce the occurrence of immune responses to rtTA protein, we mutated the dominant rtTA186 epitope and found that this leads to the appearance of subdominant epitopes. As a result, we think that an epitope modification strategy is not applicable to blunt the immune response in this model. Moreover, the identification of HLA-A*0201 rtTA epitopes allowed us to demonstrate here that the delivery of the Tet-on system with weakly immunogenic rAAV vectors does not trigger primary CTL responses in mice, in contrast to DNA transfer. Altogether, the existence of HLA-A*0201 rtTA epitopes may lead to the occurrence of immune responses depending on vectors and local inflammation in gene therapy applications involving rtTA-based regulatory systems.