ESTRO clinical practice guideline: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent progress in diagnostics and treatment of metastatic cancer patients have improved survival substantially. These developments also affect local therapies, with treatment aims shifting from short-term palliation to long-term symptom or disease control. There is consequently a need to better define the value of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of spinal metastases.

METHODS

This ESTRO clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic literature review conducted according to PRISMA standards, which formed the basis for answering four key questions about the indication and practice of SBRT for spine metastases.

RESULTS

The analysis of the key questions based on current evidence yielded 22 recommendations and 5 statements with varying levels of endorsement, all achieving a consensus among experts of at least 75%. In the majority, the level of evidence supporting the recommendations and statements was moderate or expert opinion, only, indicating that spine SBRT is still an evolving field of clinical research. Recommendations were established concerning the selection of appropriate patients with painful spine metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recommendations about the practice of spinal SBRT covered technical planning aspects including dose and fractionation, patient positioning, immobilization and image-guided SBRT delivery. Finally, recommendations were developed regarding quality assurance protocols, including description of potential SBRT-related toxicity and risk mitigation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This ESTRO clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations and statements regarding the selection of patients with spinal metastases for SBRT and its safe implementation and practice. Enrollment of patients into well-designed prospective clinical trials addressing clinically relevant questions is considered important.

Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Advances in characterizing cancer biology and the growing availability of novel targeted agents and immune therapeutics have significantly changed the prognosis of many patients with metastatic disease. Palliative radiotherapy needs to adapt to these developments. In this study, we summarize the available evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of spinal metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA methodology, including publications from January 2005 to September 2021, with the exception of the randomized phase III trial RTOG-0631 which was added in April 2023. Re-irradiation was excluded. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to pool the data. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2-test, assuming substantial and considerable as I2 > 50 % and I2 > 75 %, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 69 studies assessing the outcomes of 7236 metastases in 5736 patients were analyzed. SBRT for spine metastases showed high efficacy, with a pooled overall pain response rate of 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 68 %-94 %), pooled complete pain response of 36 % (95 % CI: 20 %-53 %), and 1-year local control rate of 94 % (95 % CI: 86 %-99 %), although with high levels of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 93 %, I2 = 86 %, and 86 %, respectively). Furthermore, SBRT was safe, with a pooled vertebral fracture rate of 9 % (95 % CI: 4 %-16 %), pooled radiation induced myelopathy rate of 0 % (95 % CI 0-2 %), and pooled pain flare rate of 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-17 %), although with mixed levels of heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 92 %, I2 = 0 %, and 95 %, respectively). Only 1.7 % of vertebral fractures required surgical stabilization.

CONCLUSION

Spine SBRT is characterized by a favorable efficacy and safety profile, providing durable results for pain control and disease control, which is particularly relevant for oligometastatic patients.

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Cervical Cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Treatment with chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy achieves high local control, but recurrence with metastatic disease impacts survival. This highlights the need for predictive and prognostic biomarkers identifying populations at risk of poorer treatment response and survival. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used in cervical cancer and is a potential source for biomarkers. Functional MRI (fMRI) can characterise tumour beyond anatomical MRI, which is limited to the assessment of morphology. This review summarises fMRI techniques used in cervical cancer and examines the role of fMRI parameters as predictive or prognostic biomarkers. Different techniques characterise different tumour factors, which helps to explain the variation in patient outcomes. These can impact simultaneously on outcomes, making biomarker identification challenging. Most studies are small, focussing on single MRI techniques, which raises the need to investigate combined fMRI approaches for a more holistic characterisation of tumour.

Comparing Proton to Photon Radiotherapy Plans: UK Consensus Guidance for Reporting Under Uncertainty for Clinical Trials

In the UK, the recent introduction of high-energy proton beam therapy into national clinical practice provides an opportunity for new clinical trials, particularly those comparing proton and photon treatments. However, comparing these different modalities can present many challenges. Although protons may confer an advantage in terms of reduced normal tissue dose, they can also be more sensitive to uncertainty. Uncertainty analysis is fundamental in ensuring that proton plans are both safe and effective in the event of unavoidable discrepancies, such as variations in patient setup and proton beam range. Methods of evaluating and mitigating the effect of these uncertainties can differ from those approaches established for photon therapy treatments, such as the use of expansion margins to assure safety. These differences should be considered when comparing protons and photons. An overview of the effect of uncertainties on proton plans is presented together with an introduction to some of the concepts and terms that should become familiar to those involved in proton therapy trials. This report aims to provide guidance for those engaged in UK clinical trials comparing protons and photons. This guidance is intended to take a pragmatic approach considering the tools that are available to practising centres and represents a consensus across multidisciplinary groups involved in proton therapy in the UK.

Abstract GS4-05: Dose escalated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for women treated by breast conservation surgery for early breast cancer: 3-year adverse effects in the IMPORT HIGH trial (CRUK/06/003)

Background

IMPORT HIGH is a randomised, multi-centre phase III trial testing dose escalated simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) against sequential boost each delivered by intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for early stage breast cancer with higher risk of local relapse. The primary endpoint was initially breast induration at 3 years, requiring 840 patients; accrual was extended (target 2568) with the new primary endpoint of local relapse. We report adverse effects (AE) at 3 years.

Methods

Women age ≥18 after breast conservation surgery for pT1-3 pN0-pN3a M0 invasive carcinoma were eligible. Randomisation was 1:1:1 between 40Gy/15F to whole breast (WB) + 16Gy/8F sequential photon boost to tumour bed (40+16Gy), 36Gy/15F to WB, 40Gy to partial breast + 48Gy (48Gy) or + 53Gy (53Gy) in 15F SIB to tumour bed. AEs were assessed annually by clinicians in all patients and in a planned sub-set (840) of patients by photographs at 3 years and by patients at 6 months, 1 and 3 years. AE scores were dichotomised as none/mild vs marked for photographs and none/mild vs moderate/marked for patients and clinicians. Fisher's exact tests compared groups; principal comparison (protocol-specified) between 53Gy and 48Gy (p&lt;0.01 defined as statistical significance).

Results

2617 women consented between 03/2009 and 09/2015 from 39 UK radiotherapy centres. Median follow-up was 49.1 (IQR 36.8-63.2) months. Median age was 49 (IQR 44-56); 9%, 38% & 53% were tumour grade 1, 2 & 3 respectively; 30% were node positive. 66% received chemotherapy and 73% endocrine therapy. 3-year AE data were available for 2017 clinician assessments, 641 photographs and 842 patient assessments. Proportions of patients with marked AEs were low overall. Rates of moderate/marked AEs at 3 years were broadly similar between the randomised groups; with a suggestion of a slightly increased risk for breast induration in 53Gy compared with control (borderline significance).

AE at 3 years 40+16Gy n(%)48Gy n(%)53Gy n(%)ClinicianBreast induration;N656668654None451 (69)483 (72)445 (68)Mild167 (25)141 (21)146 (22)Moderate32 (5)42 (6)56 (9)Marked6 (1)2 (1)7 (1)P-value 0.57010.0102  0.0443Breast shrinkage;N655669654None442 (68)472 (71)448 (69)Mild167 (26)161 (24)166 (25)Moderate40 (6)33 (5)35 (5)Marked6 (1)3 (1)5 (1)P-value 0.25410.5772  0.6373Breast distortion;N656669654None451 (69)464 (69)442 (68)Mild169 (26)170 (25)170 (26)Moderate33 (5)32 (5)38 (6)Marked3 (1)3 (1)4 (1)P-value 0.90310.4862  0.4113PatientChange in breast appearance;N287264285None38 (13)50 (19)58 (20)Mild164 (57)151 (57)142 (50)Moderate57 (20)45 (17)54 (19)Marked28 (10)18 (7)31 (11)P-value 0.14910.9992  0.1243PhotographChange in breast appearance;N218210213None183 (84)185 (88)177 (83)Mild25 (11)23 (11)32 (15)Marked10 (5)2 (1)4 (2)P-value 0.03610.1732  0.6853148Gy v 40+16Gy; 253Gy v 40+16Gy; 353Gy v 48Gy

Conclusions

These results represent the largest and most mature reported AE outcomes of breast SIB within a clinical trial. At 3 years, rates of moderate/marked AEs were similar between SIB IMRT and WB + sequential boost IMRT delivered over 3 and 4.5 weeks respectively.

Citation Format: Coles CE, Griffin CL, Kirby AM, Haviland JS, Titley JC, Benstead K, Brunt AM, Chan C, Ciurlionis L, Din OS, Donovan EM, Eaton DJ, Harnett AN, Hopwood P, Jefford ML, Jenkins PJ, Lee CE, McCormack M, Sherwin L, Syndikus I, Tsang Y, Twyman NI, Ventikaraman R, Wickers S, Wilcox MH, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR. Dose escalated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for women treated by breast conservation surgery for early breast cancer: 3-year adverse effects in the IMPORT HIGH trial (CRUK/06/003) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.

Is a nurse consultant impact toolkit relevant and transferrable to the radiography profession? An evaluation project

INTRODUCTION

Consultant posts were developed to strengthen strategic leadership whilst maintaining front line service responsibilities and clinical expertise. The nursing profession has attempted to develop tools to enable individuals to evaluate their own practice and consider relevant measurable outcomes. This study evaluated the feasibility of transferring such a nursing 'toolkit' to another health profession.

METHOD

This evaluation was structured around a one-day workshop where a nurse consultant impact toolkit was appraised and tested within the context of consultant radiographic practice. The adapted toolkit was subsequently validated using a larger sample at a national meeting of consultant radiographers.

RESULTS

There was broad agreement that the tools could be adopted for use by radiographers although several themes emerged in relation to perceived gaps within the nursing template, confirming the initial exercise. This resulted in amendments to the original scope and a proposed new evaluation tool.

CONCLUSION

The impact toolkit could help assess individual and collaborat ive role impact at a local and national level. The framework provides consultant radiographers with an opportunity to understand and highlight the contribution their roles have on patients, staff, their organisation and the wider profession.

Impact of psoriasis flare and remission on quality of life and work productivity: a real-world study in the USA

Although psoriasis patients often report a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity, less is known about how disease burden varies between periods of flare and remission. The aim of this study was tocompare HRQoL and work productivity by disease activity level. Data were extracted from Adelphi 2011/2013 Disease Specific Programmes, two real world surveys of US dermatologists and psoriasis patients. HRQoL was measured using the EuroQOL 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Work productivity was measured using the Work Productivity Activity index (WPAI). Three levels of disease activity were constructed based on physician reports: remission, active not flaring, active, and flaring. Multivariable regression analyses explored the relationship between disease activity, HRQoL and work productivity, controlling for differences in demographics and comorbidities. Out of 681 psoriasis patients 24% were in remission, 62% had active disease without flaring, and 15% experienced active disease and were currently flaring. Greater disease activity was associated with worse HRQoL. EQ-5D scores decreased with more active disease (remission vs. active not flaring vs. active and flaring: 0.93 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.82; p&lt;0.05), while DLQI scores increased (remission vs. active not flaring vs. active and flaring: 2.0 vs. 5.00 vs. 8.7; p&lt;0.05). WPAI scores increased with disease activity indicating increased productivity loss (remission vs. active not flaring vs. active and flaring: 5.9 vs. 14.8 vs. 26.9; p&lt;0.05). The same trends were confirmed by multivariable regression analyses.

Development of a novel treatment planning test for credentialing rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The increasing use of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in UK centres will result in more centres choosing to use this technology in a clinical trial setting. The Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group has developed a new procedure to integrate into the UK intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) credentialing programme to cover rotational IMRT delivery techniques.

METHODS

A planning test [three-dimensional treatment planning system (3DTPS)] was designed specifically for rotational IMRT techniques. The feasibility of using this test in the credentialing programme for rotational IMRT was validated by 10 experienced UK centres. The study included five centres using Varian RapidArc™ (RA) (Varian Medical Systems, Milpitas, CA), two using Elekta VMAT™ (VMAT) (Elekta Inc., Norcross, GA) and three using helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Centres were asked to carry out their own in-house quality assurance (QA) for the plans submitted for this study. A survey was sent out to centres aiming to gather information on their experience in undertaking the exercise and their QA results.

RESULTS

All centres fulfilled the primary goal by achieving the dose constraints of the primary planning target volume and organ at risk. Seven centres (three RA, one VMAT and three HT plans) were able to fulfil the secondary goal. Among those seven centres, three centres (two RA and one VMAT plans) achieved the tertiary goal. The results of the survey indicated that the 3DTPS test is a clinically relevant and practical planning test to be used.

CONCLUSION

A planning test for rotational therapy techniques was developed for the RTTQA IMRT credentialing programme.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study validated the feasibility of a 3DTPS test to be used as part of a credentialing programme for rotational IMRT techniques in the UK.

Does participation in clinical trials influence the implementation of new techniques? A look at changing techniques in breast radiotherapy in the UK

AIMS

To examine the effect of UK breast radiotherapy trials on the adoption of new radiotherapy techniques over the last 15 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data were taken from questionnaires returned to the national radiotherapy quality assurance team for each of the major trials (START, Supremo, FAST, IMPORT) with additional information sought from heads of radiotherapy physics departments where needed.

RESULTS

The peak years for the introduction of three-dimensional radiotherapy corresponded to the opening of new trials requiring these techniques. Some non-trial centres had still not implemented three-dimensional techniques for breast cancer patients at the time the most recent questionnaire was completed (2009).

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials provide the framework and impetus for introducing more accurate radiotherapy for UK women with early breast cancer.

Quality assurance analysis of participating centres' protocol compliance to a UK multicentre hypofractionated breast (FAST) trial

OBJECTIVES

The FAST (FASTer radiotherapy for breast radiotherapy) trial is a UK Phase 2 multicentre randomised clinical trial evaluating a five-fraction schedule of whole-breast radiotherapy following local excision of early breast cancer. The purpose of this quality assurance study was to analyse the radiotherapy planning data in order to confirm compliance with the trial protocol.

METHODS

915 patients were recruited between 2004 and 2007 from 18 centres. The protocol required that all centres should use three-dimensional dose compensations to optimise radiotherapy plans. Planning techniques, maximum dose (D(max)) and dose-volume histograms from treatment plans were evaluated and compared between centres. The homogeneity of plans was tested by creating a cut-off value of 5% for the percentage of breast volume receiving >105% of the prescribed dose.

RESULTS

672 data sets from 15 centres were available. 93% (624/672) of plans were treated using forward-planned multileaf collimator (MLC) segments, 6% with breast compensators and 1% with inverse-planned MLC segments. 94% (635/672) of patients had a D(max)≤107% of the prescribed dose. 11% (74/672) of plans delivered >105% of the prescribed dose to >5% of the breast volume.

CONCLUSION

Reviewing the data in this study, 95% of plans submitted by centres complied with the protocol. With the improved breast radiotherapy standards shown in FAST centres, the following recommendations were suggested for future UK breast radiotherapy trials: (i) the minimum, mean and maximum dose to the whole-breast planning target volume (PTV) should be recorded and assessed; (ii) apart from having a D(max)≤107% of the prescribed dose, ≤5% of PTV should a receive dose >105% of the prescription dose.

Comparison of conventional and three-dimensional conformal CT planning techniques for preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the impact of three-dimensional (3D) conformal planning vs conventional planning of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) on small bowel and bladder sparing and in optimising coverage of tumour target volume.

METHODS

Conformal and conventional plans were created for 50 consecutive patients. The conformal plan delineated a gross tumour volume (GTV), a clinical target volume (CTV) 1 to cover potential subclinical disease spread, a CTV2 to outline the mesorectum and lymph node areas at risk, and a planning target volume (PTV) to cover set-up error and organ movement. The conventional plan was created using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). Patients were treated with a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy over 5 weeks. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were created and compared for GTV, PTV, small bowel and bladder. The GTV was covered by the conventional plan in all patients.

RESULTS

Significant differences were shown for median PTV coverage with conformal planning compared with conventional planning: 99.2% vs 94.2% (range 95.9-100% vs 75.5-100%); p<0.05. The median volume of irradiated small bowel was significantly lower for CT plans at all DVH levels. Median bladder doses did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

3D conformal CT planning is superior to conventional planning in terms of coverage of the tumour volume. It significantly reduces the volume of small bowel irradiated with no decrease in the rate of R0 resection compared with published data, and at the present time should be considered as the standard of care for rectal cancer planning.