Serum protein profile analysis in lysosomal storage disorders patients

INTRODUCTION

Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is a well-established technique to identify alterations in plasma protein profiles, caused by diseases as multiple myeloma (MM). In addition, it could be a cost-effective technique to discover new plasma biomarkers. Relation between MM and lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) as Gaucher disease has been set out but, it has not been evaluated on other LSDs nor the utility of the SPE as first step on LSDs biomarkers discovery projects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stored plasma samples at diagnosis from several LSDs patients underwent analysis. Quality control was checked prior to the SPE was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. The analysis for monoclonal spikes and the differences between each fraction on patients' samples vs the control data previously published, were evaluated. Furthermore, immunoprotein quantification and free light chains ratio were done by nephelometry and turbidimetry.

RESULTS

Seventy-five samples of LSD patients at diagnosis, were assessed. The frequency of the MGUS on LSDs patients was not higher than in general population whereas one lysosomal acid lipase deficiency infant showed increased IgA and kappa deviation. Regarding to the usefulness of SPE in biomarkers discovery, statistically significant differences were observed on SPE fractions between LSDs and healthy population.

DISCUSSION

The evaluation of SPE fractions can be a useful tool to understand pathophysiologic aspects in LDSs and, to simplify new marker discovery projects. In some of them, the MGUS appearance is a risk factor for the MM development despite its frequency is not increased on the studied LSDs at diagnosis.

Identifying and overcoming barriers to harmonize newborn screening programs through consensus strategies

The benefits of newborn screening (NBS) programs have been widely demonstrated after more than 50 years since first established. NBS enables the detection of the disease before the child shows clinical symptoms, allowing clinicians to act early and facilitating appropriate interventions to prevent or improve adverse outcomes. Delay or lack of medical intervention in these infants may lead to developmental delay, severe disability, or premature death. NBS programs have grown exponentially both in the number of diseases screened and in complexity, creating controversy. New technological advances, as well as the emergence of new therapies that require early disease detection, have allowed for the inclusion of new diseases in NBS screening programs. However, different countries and even different regions have in turn adopted very diverse strategies and diagnostic algorithms when it comes to NBS. There are many factors responsible for these differences, such as the health care system, available funds, local politics, professional groups, and others that depend on the position taken by policymakers. These differences in NBS have led to discrepancies in detection opportunities between countries or regions, which has led to many varied attempts to harmonize NBS programs but not all have been equally satisfactory. Some countries have achieved good results, but always within their borders. Therefore, there are still many differences between NBS programs at the international level that must be overcome. These advances have also brought considerable uncertainty regarding ethical aspects and balance between benefits and harms. For this reason, and so that the situation of disparity in the global NBS programs can be minimized, health authorities must work to develop uniform criteria for decision-making and to take a further step toward harmonization. To do so, it is necessary to identify the crucial factors that lead to the adoption of different NBS programs worldwide, in order to analyze their influence and find ways to overcome them.

Newborn screening for homocystinurias: Recent recommendations versus current practice

PURPOSE

To assess how the current practice of newborn screening (NBS) for homocystinurias compares with published recommendations.

METHODS

Twenty-two of 32 NBS programmes from 18 countries screened for at least one form of homocystinuria. Centres provided pseudonymised NBS data from patients with cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency (CBSD, n = 19), methionine adenosyltransferase I/III deficiency (MATI/IIID, n = 28), combined remethylation disorder (cRMD, n = 56) and isolated remethylation disorder (iRMD), including methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency (MTHFRD) (n = 8). Markers and decision limits were converted to multiples of the median (MoM) to allow comparison between centres.

RESULTS

NBS programmes, algorithms and decision limits varied considerably. Only nine centres used the recommended second-tier marker total homocysteine (tHcy). The median decision limits of all centres were ≥ 2.35 for high and ≤ 0.44 MoM for low methionine, ≥ 1.95 for high and ≤ 0.47 MoM for low methionine/phenylalanine, ≥ 2.54 for high propionylcarnitine and ≥ 2.78 MoM for propionylcarnitine/acetylcarnitine. These decision limits alone had a 100%, 100%, 86% and 84% sensitivity for the detection of CBSD, MATI/IIID, iRMD and cRMD, respectively, but failed to detect six individuals with cRMD. To enhance sensitivity and decrease second-tier testing costs, we further adapted these decision limits using the data of 15 000 healthy newborns.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the favorable outcome of early treated patients, NBS for homocystinurias is recommended. To improve NBS, decision limits should be revised considering the population median. Relevant markers should be combined; use of the postanalytical tools offered by the CLIR project (Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports, which considers, for example, birth weight and gestational age) is recommended. tHcy and methylmalonic acid should be implemented as second-tier markers.