Effects of clinically achievable pulmonary antibiotic concentrations on the recovery of bacteria: in vitro comparison of the BioFire FILMARRAY Pneumonia Panel versus conventional culture methods in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Empiric antibiotics may affect bacterial pathogen recovery using conventional culture methods (CCMs), while PCR-based diagnostics are likely less affected. Herein, we conducted an in vitro study of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) inoculated with bacteria and clinically relevant antibiotic concentrations to compare the recovery between the BioFire FILMARRAY Pneumonia Panel (Pn Panel) and CCMs. Remnant clinical BAL specimens were inoculated to ~105 cfu/mL using 12 clinical isolates. Isolates consisted of one wild-type (WT) and one or more resistant strains of: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Staphylococcus aureus. Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin, or vancomycin was added to achieve pulmonary epithelial lining fluid peak and trough concentrations. Post-exposure cfu/mL was quantified by CCMs and simultaneously tested by the PN Panel for identification and semi-quantitative genetic copies/mL. CCM results were categorized as significant growth (SG) (≥1 × 104), no significant growth (NSG) (≥1 × 103, <1 × 104), or no growth (NG) (<1 × 103). The PN Panel accurately identified all isolates, resistance genes, and reported ≥106 genetic copies/mL regardless of antibiotic exposure. The CCM also identified all S. aureus strains exposed to vancomycin. For WT Gram-negative isolates exposed to antibiotics, SG, NSG, and NG were observed in 7/52 (13%), 18/52 (35%), and 27/52 (52%) of CCM experiments, respectively. For resistant Gram-negatives isolates, SG, NSG, and NG were observed in 62/88 (70%), 17/88 (19%), and 9/88 (10%), respectively. These in vitro data demonstrate that the PN Panel is able to identify Gram-negative pathogens in the presence of clinically significant antibiotic concentrations when CCM may not.

Performance and Hypothetical Impact on Joint Infection Management of the BioFire Joint Infection Panel: a Retrospective Analysis

Pathogen identification is key in septic arthritis. Culture-based techniques are challenging, especially when patients have been pretreated with antibiotics or when difficult-to-culture bacteria are encountered. The BioFire joint infection assay (BJA) is a multiplex PCR panel which detects 31 of the most prevalent bacterial and fungal pathogens causing septic arthritis. Here, 123 cryoconserved contemporary synovial fluid samples from 120 patients underwent BJA analysis. Results were compared to those of culture-based diagnostics (standard of care [SOC]). Clinical data were collected, and the possible impact of the molecular diagnostic application on patient management was evaluated. Fifteen of 123 synovial fluid cultures grew bacterial pathogens. All on-panel pathogens (9/15) were correctly identified by the BJA. The BJA identified four additional bacterial pathogens in four SOC-negative cases. BJA sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.2% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.8% to 100%), respectively. Compared to the SOC, the BJA would have resulted in faster provision of species identification and molecular susceptibility data by 49 h and 99 h, respectively. Clinical data analysis indicates that in BJA-positive cases, faster species ID could have led to timelier optimization of antibiotic therapy. This retrospective study demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity of the BJA to detect on-panel organisms in bacterial arthritis. The usefulness of the BJA in prosthetic-joint infections is limited, as important pathogens (i.e., coagulase negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium acnes) are not covered. Evidence from patient data analysis suggests that the assay might prove valuable for optimizing patient management in acute arthritis related to fastidious organisms or for patients who received antibiotics prior to specimen collection.

Clinical Evaluation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) Elite Agar, a New Medium for the Isolation of NTM: a Multicenter Study

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are gaining interest with the increased number of infected patients. NTM Elite agar is designed specifically for the isolation of NTM without the decontamination step. We assessed the clinical performance of this medium combined with Vitek mass spectrometry (MS) matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) technology for the isolation and identification of NTM in a prospective multicenter study, including 15 laboratories (24 hospitals). A total of 2,567 samples from patients with suspected NTM infection were analyzed (1,782 sputa, 434 bronchial aspirates, 200 bronchoalveolar lavage samples, 34 bronchial lavage samples, and 117 other samples). A total of 220 samples (8.6%) were positive with existing laboratory methods against 330 with NTM Elite agar (12.8%). Using the combination of both methods, 437 isolates of NTM were detected in 400 positive samples (15.6% of samples). In total, 140 samples of the standard procedures (SP) and 98 of the NTM Elite agar were contaminated. NTM Elite agar showed a higher performance for rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) species than SP (7% versus 3%, P < 0.001). A trend has been noted for the Mycobacterium avium complex (4% with SP versus 3% with NTM Elite agar, P = 0.06). The time to positivity was similar (P = 0.13) between groups. However, the time to positivity was significantly shorter for the RGM in subgroup analysis (7 days with NTM and 6 days with SP, P = 0.01). NTM Elite agar has been shown to be useful for the recovery of NTM species, especially for the RGM. Using NTM Elite agar + Vitek MS system in combination with SP increases the number of NTM isolated from clinical samples.