Presentation of Organ Dose and Effective Dose Conversion Factors in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

Background

The same conversion factors (k-factors) of Single CT (SECT) are applied to estimate the Effective Dose (ED) in Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT). However, k-factors for different organs need independently validating for DECT, due to the different conditions in DECT.

Objective

This study aimed to calculate organ dose and k-factors in different imaging protocols (liver, chest, cardiac, and abdomen) for male and female phantoms.

Material and Methods

This Monte Carlo Simulation study used Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code for modeling a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash dual-source CT scanner. The organ dose, dose length product, and k-factors were calculated for the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) of male and female phantoms.

Results

For the male phantom, the k-factors for the liver, chest, cardiac, and abdomen-pelvis imaging protocols are equal to 0.020, 0.012, 0.016, and 0.014 mSv.mGy-1cm-1, respectively. For the female phantom, the corresponding values are equal to 0.026, 0.023, 0.036, and 0.018, respectively. These values for DECT are different from those corresponding values for SECT, especially for the female phantom.

Conclusion

The calculated k-factors for DECT can be used as reference values for the estimation of ED in DECT.

Assessment of Field-in-Field, 3-Field, and 4-Field Treatment Planning Methods for Radiotherapy of Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer

Background

Gastro-esophageal (GE) junction cancer is the fastest-growing tumor, particularly in the United States (US).

Objective

This study aimed to compare dosimetric and radiobiological factors among field-in-field (FIF), three-field (3F), and four-field box (4FB) radiotherapy planning techniques for gastro-esophageal junction cancer.

Material and Methods

In this experimental study, thirty patients with GE junction cancer were evaluated, and three planning techniques (field-in-field (FIF), three-field (3F), and four-field box (4FB)) were performed for each patient for a 6-MV photon beam. Dose distribution in the target volume, the monitor units (MUs) required, and the dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) were compared for these techniques using the paired-sample t-test.

Results

A significant difference was measured between the FIF and 3F techniques with respect to conformity index (CI), dose homogeneity index (HI), and tumor control probability (TCP) for the target organ, as well as the D_mean for the heart, kidneys, and liver. For the spinal cord, the FIF technique showed a slight reduction in the maximum dose compared to the other two techniques. In addition, the V_{20 Gy} of the lungs and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of all OARs were reduced with FIF method.

Conclusion

The FIF technique showed better performance for treating patients with gastro-esophageal junction tumors, in terms of dose homogeneity in the target, conformity of the radiation field with the target volume, TCP, less dose to healthy organs, and fewer MU.

Accuracy Evaluation of EPL and ETAR Algorithms in the Treatment Planning Systems using CIRS Thorax Phantom

Background:

It is recommended for each set of radiation data and algorithm that subtle deliberation is done regarding dose calculation accuracy. Knowing the errors in dose calculation for each treatment plan will result in an accurate estimate of the actual dose achieved by the tumor.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the equivalent path length (EPL) and equivalent tissue air ratio (ETAR) algorithms in radiation dose calculation.

Material and Methods:

In this experimental study, the TEC-DOC 1583 guideline was used. Measurements and calculations were obtained for each algorithm at specific points in thorax CIRS phantom for 6 and 18 MVs and results were compared.

Results:

In the EPL, calculations were in agreement with measurements for 27 points and differences between them ranged from 0.1% to 10.4% at 6 MV. The calculations were in agreement with measurements for 21 points and differences between them ranged from 0.4% to 13% at 18 MV. In ETAR, calculations were also in consistent with measurements for 21 points, and differences between them ranged from 0.1% to 9% at 6 MV. Moreover, for 18 MV, the calculations were in agreement with measurements for 17 points and differences between them ranged from 0% to 11%.

Conclusion:

For the EPL algorithm, more dose points were in consistent with acceptance criteria. The errors in the ETAR were 1% to 2% less than the EPL. The greatest calculation error occurs in low-density lung tissue with inhomogeneities or in high-density bone. Errors were larger in shallow depths. The error in higher energy was more than low energy beam.

Evaluating Dose-response of Cataract Induction in Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers Patients

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancers are currently the most common types of cancers. 3D-conformal radiation therapy is the most common dose delivery technique for head and neck cancers. Eye Lens is a radio sensitive structure and cataract formation as a visual disorder associated with exposure to ionizing radiation which is documented.

OBJECTIVE

Determining the radiation dose to eye lens during head and neck radiography and estimating the probability of cataract induction are essential.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This experimental study was performed on 14 patients with head and neck cancers through experimental study analysis. The maximum opacity of the eyes lens were measured by pentacamTM before radiation therapy. CT data of patients were transmitted to Isogray treatment planning Software, and dose calculations for each patient was performed. At the end of radiation treatment, 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy, the eye lens opacity of the patients was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 28 lenses were studied. Statistical one sample K- S test proved normality of obtained data. Using repeated measures test, the relation before and 3 months after radiotherapy, as well as the relationship before and 6 months after radiotherapy proved a significant relationship.

CONCLUSION

The opacity caused by radiation in eyes is a non-statistical and linear-quadratic response curve with no threshold. This opacity can also appear within 3 months after completion of radiation therapy.

Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Scanning in Hamadan

Background:

New advancements have increased the capabilities of computed tomography as a sectional medical imaging modality. An important note is assessing absorbed dose to patients and minimizing it when performing computed tomography examinations. One approach to control dose is to establish diagnostic reference levels.

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate diagnostic reference levels of computed tomography in Hamadan.

Material and Methods:

This work was conducted as an experimental study. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) was measured using a Piranha quality control kit, head and body CTDI phantoms for brain, lung, abdomen-pelvic and coronary CT angiography examinations. Volume Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI_vol) was calculated from obtained data and 3^rd quartile of that was determined as diagnostic reference levels.

Results:

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in terms of CTDI_vol for brain, lung, abdomen-pelvic and coronary CT angiography were 50/25, 6/73, 22/01 and 32/06 mGy respectively in Hamadan. Difference between displayed CTDI_vol and measured CTDI_vol is not significance for all examinations (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

DRLs depend on to many dose affecting parameters in CT. DRL for brain CT is greater than other scan regions. Application of DRLs which resulted from this study can help to optimize radiation dose to the patients while maintaining acceptable diagnostic images quality.

Optimization of Clarkson's Method for Calculating Absorbed Dose under Compensator Filters used in Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy

Background:

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is extensively used in the treatment of malignancies. Clarkson’s method is one of the leading methods for dose calculation at open points present in irregular fields.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to generalize the Clarkson’s method for dose calculation at points under compensator filters in IMRT method and its application in IMRT quality control as well.

Material and Methods:

In this experimental study, compensator filters were designed in two forms: flat filter and block piled-up compensator. The measurements for the compensator filters and open fields in 5 and10 cm depths at energy levels (6, 10 and 18 MV) and in fields with different dimensions were performed using “Mapcheck2” dosimeter. The aim of performing calculations is to derive the theoretical dose by the generalized Clarkson’s equation and comparing it with data resulted from the measurement for confirming the Clarkson’s equation presented.

Results:

These results demonstrate the data derived from the generalized Clarkson’s method are in good agreement with the data resulted from measurement; the highest error of the proposed equation was 3% for flat filter, and less than 5% for block-piled-up filter. Higher error in the block-piled-up filter compared with the flat filter was due to the presence of leakage between these blocks.

Conclusion:

The results of this study demonstrated that the presented equation is reliable and valid, and the proposed equation can be applied for dose calculation at all points under the compensator filter or the shielded areas.

Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques

Background:

The HU linearity is an essential parameter in a quantitative imaging and the treatment planning systems of radiotherapy.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the linearity of Hounsfield unit (HU) in applying the adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) on CT scanner and its comparison to the filtered back-projection (FBP).

Material and Methods:

In this experimental phantom study, a TOS-phantom was scanned using a Toshiba Alexion 6 CT scanner. The images were reconstructed using the FBP and AIDR. Measurements of HU and noise values were performed on images of the “HU linearity” module of the TOS-phantom. The module had five embedded objects, i.e., air, polypropylene, nylon, acrylic, and Delrin. On each object, a circle area of 4.32 cm² was drawn and used to measure HU and noise values. The R² of the relation between mass densities vs. HU values was used to measure HU linearities at four different tube voltages. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare unpaired data and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The AIDR method produced a significant smaller image noise than the FBP method (p-value < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HU values of images reconstructed using FBP and AIDR methods (p-value > 0.05). The HU values acquired by the methods showed the same linearity marked by coinciding linear lines with the same R² value (> 0.999).

Conclusion:

AIDR methods produce the HU linearity as FBP methods with a smaller image noise level.