Diastolic function assessment with four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using automatic deep learning E/A ratio analysis

BACKGROUND

Diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a powerful contributor to the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure. In patients with depressed LV systolic function, the E/A ratio, the ratio between the peak early (E) and the peak late (A) transmitral flow velocity, is the first step to defining the grade of diastolic dysfunction. Doppler echocardiography (echo) is the preferred imaging technique for diastolic function assessment, while cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is less established as a method. Previous four-dimensional (4D) Flow-based studies have looked at the E/A ratio proximal to the mitral valve, requiring manual interaction. In this study, we compare an automated, deep learning-based and two semi-automated approaches for 4D Flow CMR-based E/A ratio assessment to conventional, gold-standard echo-based methods.

METHODS

Ninety-seven subjects with chronic ischemic heart disease underwent a cardiac echo followed by CMR investigation. 4D Flow-based E/A ratio values were computed using three different approaches; two semi-automated, assessing the E/A ratio by measuring the inflow velocity (MVvel) and the inflow volume (MVflow) at the mitral valve plane, and one fully automated, creating a full LV segmentation using a deep learning-based method with which the E/A ratio could be assessed without constraint to the mitral plane (LVvel).

RESULTS

MVvel, MVflow, and LVvel E/A ratios were strongly associated with echocardiographically derived E/A ratio (R2 = 0.60, 0.58, 0.72). LVvel peak E and A showed moderate association to Echo peak E and A, while MVvel values were weakly associated. MVvel and MVflow EA ratios were very strongly associated with LVvel (R2 = 0.84, 0.86). MVvel peak E was moderately associated with LVvel, while peak A showed a strong association (R2 = 0.26, 0.57).

CONCLUSION

Peak E, peak A, and E/A ratio are integral to the assessment of diastolic dysfunction and may expand the utility of CMR studies in patients with cardiovascular disease. While underestimation of absolute peak E and A velocities was noted, the E/A ratio measured with all three 4D Flow methods was strongly associated with the gold standard Doppler echocardiography. The automatic, deep learning-based method performed best, with the most favorable runtime of ∼40 seconds. As both semi-automatic methods associated very strongly to LVvel, they could be employed as an alternative for estimation of E/A ratio.

4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update

Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 '4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement'. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.

Repeatability and reproducibility of various 4D Flow MRI postprocessing software programs in a multi-software and multi-vendor cross-over comparison study

BACKGROUND

Different software programs are available for the evaluation of 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). A good agreement of the results between programs is a prerequisite for the acceptance of the method. Therefore, the goal was to compare quantitative results from a cross-over comparison in individuals examined on two scanners of different vendors analyzed with four postprocessing software packages.

METHODS

Eight healthy subjects (27 ± 3 years, 3 women) were each examined on two 3T CMR systems (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare; MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthineers) with a standardized 4D Flow CMR sequence. Six manually placed aortic contours were evaluated with Caas (Pie Medical Imaging, SW-A), cvi42 (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, SW-B), GTFlow (GyroTools, SW-C), and MevisFlow (Fraunhofer Institute MEVIS, SW-D) to analyze seven clinically used parameters including stroke volume, peak flow, peak velocity, and area as well as typically scientifically used wall shear stress values. Statistical analysis of inter- and intrareader variability, inter-software and inter-scanner comparison included calculation of absolute and relative error (ER), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and equivalence testing based on the assumption that inter-software differences needed to be within 80% of the range of intrareader differences.

RESULTS

SW-A and SW-C were the only software programs showing agreement for stroke volume (ICC = 0.96; ER = 3 ± 8%), peak flow (ICC: 0.97; ER = -1 ± 7%), and area (ICC = 0.81; ER = 2 ± 22%). Results from SW-A/D and SW-C/D were equivalent only for area and peak flow. Other software pairs did not yield equivalent results for routinely used clinical parameters. Especially peak maximum velocity yielded poor agreement (ICC ≤ 0.4) between all software packages except SW-A/D that showed good agreement (ICC = 0.80). Inter- and intrareader consistency for clinically used parameters was best for SW-A and SW-D (ICC = 0.56-97) and worst for SW-B (ICC = -0.01-0.71). Of note, inter-scanner differences per individual tended to be smaller than inter-software differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all tested software programs, only SW-A and SW-C can be used equivalently for determination of stroke volume, peak flow, and vessel area. Irrespective of the applied software and scanner, high intra- and interreader variability for all parameters have to be taken into account before introducing 4D Flow CMR in clinical routine. Especially in multicenter clinical trials a single image evaluation software should be applied.

Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)

Flow-sensitive four-dimensional Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D Flow CMR) has increasingly been utilised to characterise patients' blood flow, in association with patiens' state of health and disease, even though spatial and temporal resolutions still constitute a limit. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a powerful tool that could expand these information and, if integrated with experimentally-obtained velocity fields, would enable to derive a large variety of the flow descriptors of interest. However, the accuracy of the flow parameters is highly influenced by the quality of the input data such as the anatomical model and boundary conditions typically derived from medical images including 4D Flow CMR. We previously proposed a novel approach in which 4D Flow CMR and CFD velocity fields are integrated to obtain an Enhanced 4D Flow CMR (EMRI), allowing to overcome the spatial-resolution limitation of 4D Flow CMR, and enable an accurate quantification of flow. In this paper, the proposed approach is validated in a U bend channel, an idealised model of the human aortic arch. The flow patterns were studied with 4D Flow CMR, CFD and EMRI, and compared with high resolution 2D PIV experiments obtained in pulsatile conditions. The main strengths and limitations of 4D Flow CMR and CFD were illustrated by exploiting the accuracy of PIV by comparing against PIV velocity fields. EMRI flow patterns showed a better qualitative and quantitative agreement with PIV results than the other techniques. EMRI enables to overcome the experimental limitations of MRI-based velocity measurements and the modelling simplifications of CFD, allowing an accurate prediction of complex flow patterns observed experimentally, while satisfying mass and momentum balance equations.

Post-cardioversion Improvement in LV Function Defined by 4D Flow Patterns and Energetics in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cause of cardiovascular morbidity, including thromboembolism and heart failure. Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) detected in AF patients may be either precursor or consequence of the arrythmia. Successful cardioversion of chronic AF is often followed by a transient period of left atrial (LA) stunning, where depressed mechanical atrial contraction persists despite reinstitution of sinus rhythm. To determine if AF-associated LVD would improve with resolution of LA dysfunction, AF patients were examined immediately and 4 weeks after cardioversion to sinus rhythm. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assesses ventricular function according to the volumes and energetics of functional components of the LV volume. Previously, described 4D CMR markers of LVD include decreased volume and end-diastolic kinetic energy (KE) of the Direct flow, which is the portion of LV volume that passes directly from inflow to outflow in a single cycle. We hypothesize that impaired LV flow patterns and energetics will be found immediately after cardioversion during atrial stunning, and that those parameters will improve as atrial function returns.

Methods

Ten patients with a history of AF underwent CMR 2-3 h (Time-1) and 4 weeks (Time-2), following electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. 4D phase-contrast velocity data and morphological images were acquired at a 3T CMR system. Using a previously evaluated method, pathlines were emitted from the LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and traced forward and backward in time until end-systole. The LVEDV was automatically separated into four functional flow components whose volume and KE were calculated.

Results

Left atrial fractional area change increased over the follow-up period (P = 0.001), indicating recovery of LA mechanical function. LVEF increased between Time-1 and Time-2 (P = 0.003); LVEDVI did not change (P = 0.319). Over that interval, the ratios of Direct flow/LVEDV volume and KE increased (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), while the ratios of Residual volume/LVEDV volume and KE decreased (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively).

Conclusion

Post-cardioversion recovery of LA function was associated with improvements in conventional and 4D CMR markers of LV function. Flow-specific measures demonstrate the negative but potentially reversible impact of LA dysfunction on volume and energetic aspects of LV function.