Variations in cost of transport and their ecological consequences: a review

Movement is essential in the ecology of most animals, and it typically consumes a large proportion of individual energy budgets. Environmental conditions modulate the energetic cost of movement (cost of transport, COT), and there are pronounced differences in COT between individuals within species and across species. Differences in morphology affect COT, but the physiological mechanisms underlying variation in COT remain unresolved. Candidates include mitochondrial efficiency and the efficiency of muscle contraction-relaxation dynamics. Animals can offset increased COT behaviourally by adjusting movement rate and habitat selection. Here, we review the theory underlying COT and the impact of environmental changes on COT. Increasing temperatures, in particular, increase COT and its variability between individuals. Thermal acclimation and exercise can affect COT, but this is not consistent across taxa. Anthropogenic pollutants can increase COT, although few chemical pollutants have been investigated. Ecologically, COT may modify the allocation of energy to different fitness-related functions, and thereby influence fitness of individuals, and the dynamics of animal groups and communities. Future research should consider the effects of multiple stressors on COT, including a broader range of pollutants, the underlying mechanisms of COT and experimental quantifications of potential COT-induced allocation trade-offs.

Fatter or stronger: Resource allocation strategy and the underlying metabolic mechanisms in amphibian tadpoles

The allocation of resources between storage and somatic growth is an essential physiological phenomenon in animals. Allocation mechanisms have broad theoretical and applied implications. The real-time resource allocation patterns in animals remain to be elucidated, and there is limited understanding of the metabolic mechanisms. We investigated the resource allocation strategy of Rana omeimontis tadpoles. Their ontogenetic fat accumulation began when body weight increased to 30-50 mg, at which time storage had a high priority in resource allocation. Beyond this weight range, somatic growth accelerated but storage investment was maintained, resulting in a positive correlation between body fat index and body weight at the population level. This pattern could be explained by assuming a positive relationship between storage abundance and growth investment, and this was supported by the prioritized increment of body fat to body weight when tadpoles were provided with increased food. At the metabolic level, hepatic fat accumulation was accompanied by upregulated utilization of fat storage, and the tadpoles presented lipid-based energy metabolism. Activating the mobilization of hepatic fat storage promoted somatic growth. In short, the liver is like a reservoir with valves that regulate energy flow for downstream developmental processes. These results provide novel mechanistic insights into resource allocation.

Cost of transport is a repeatable trait but is not determined by mitochondrial efficiency in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

The energy used to move a given distance (cost of transport; CoT) varies significantly between individuals of the same species. A lower CoT allows animals to allocate more of their energy budget to growth and reproduction. A higher CoT may cause animals to adjust their movement across different environmental gradients to reduce energy allocated to movement. The aim of this project was to determine whether CoT is a repeatable trait within individuals, and to determine its physiological causes and ecological consequences. We found that CoT is a repeatable trait in zebrafish (Danio rerio). We rejected the hypothesis that mitochondrial efficiency (P/O ratios) predicted CoT. We also rejected the hypothesis that CoT is modulated by temperature acclimation, exercise training or their interaction, although CoT increased with increasing acute test temperature. There was a weak but significant negative correlation between CoT and dispersal, measured as the number of exploration decisions made by fish, and the distance travelled against the current in an artificial stream. However, CoT was not correlated with the voluntary speed of fish moving against the current. The implication of these results is that CoT reflects a fixed physiological phenotype of an individual, which is not plastic in response to persistent environmental changes. Consequently, individuals may have fundamentally different energy budgets as they move across environments, and may adjust movement patterns as a result of allocation trade-offs. It was surprising that mitochondrial efficiency did not explain differences in CoT, and our working hypothesis is that the energetics of muscle contraction and relaxation may determine CoT. The increase in CoT with increasing acute environmental temperature means that warming environments will increase the proportion of the energy budget allocated to locomotion unless individuals adjust their movement patterns.