Estimating the amplitude spectrum area of ventricular fibrillation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using only ECG waveform

Background

Amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) calculated from ventricular fibrillation (VF) can be used to monitor the effectiveness of chest compression (CC) and optimize the timing of defibrillation. However, reliable AMSA can only be obtained during CC pause because of artifacts. In this study, we sought to develop a method for estimating AMSA during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using only the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform.

Methods

Intervals of 8 seconds ECG and CC-related references, including 4 seconds during CC and an adjacent 4 seconds without CC, were collected before 1,008 defibrillation shocks from 512 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Signal quality was analyzed based on the irregularity of autocorrelation of VF. If signal quality index (SQI) was high, AMSA would be calculated from the original signal. Otherwise, CC-related artifacts would be constructed and suppressed using the least mean square filter from VF before calculation of AMSA. The algorithm was optimized using 480 training shocks and evaluated using 528 independent testing shocks.

Results

Overall, CC resulted in lower SQI [0.15 (0.04-0.61) with CC vs. 0.75 (0.61-0.83) without CC, P<0.01] and higher AMSA [11.2 (7.7-16.2) with CC vs. 7.2 (4.9-10.6) mVHz without CC, P<0.01] values. The predictive accuracy (49.2% vs. 66.5%, P<0.01) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.647 vs. 0.734, P<0.01) were significantly decreased during CC. Using the proposed method, the estimated AMSA was 7.1 (5.0-15.2) mVHz, the predictive accuracy was 67.0% and the AUC was 0.713, which were all comparable with those calculated without CC.

Conclusions

Using the signal quality-based artifact suppression method, AMSA can be reliably estimated and continuously monitored during CPR.

End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and ventricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) for shock outcome prediction in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Are they two sides of the same coin?

AIM

Ventricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) are predictors of shock success, understood as restoration of an organized rhythm, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, little is known about their combined use. We aimed to assess the prediction accuracy when combined, and to clarify if they are correlated in out of hospital cardiac arrest' victims.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records acquired by external defibrillators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients of the Lombardia Cardiac Arrest registry were processed. The 1-min pre-shock ETCO₂ median value (METCO₂) was computed from the capnogram and AMSA (2-48 mV.Hz range) computed applying the Fast Fourier Transform to a 2-second pre-shock filtered ECG interval (0.5-30 Hz). Support Vector Machine (SVM) predictive models based on METCO₂, AMSA and their combination were fit; results were given as the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

We considered 112 patients with 391 shocks delivered. METCO₂ and AMSA were predictors of shock success [AUC (IQR) of the ROC curve: 0.59 (0.56-0.62); 0.68 (0.65-0.72), respectively] and of ROSC [0.56 (0.53-0.59); 0.74 (0.71-0.78),]. Their combination in a SVM model increased the accuracy for predicting shock success [AUC (IQR) of the ROC curve: 0.71 (0.68-0.75)] and ROSC [0.77 (0.73-0.8)]. AMSA and METCO₂ were significantly correlated only in patients who achieved ROSC (rho = 0.33 p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

AMSA and ETCO₂ predict shock success and ROSC after every shock, and their predictive power increases if combined. Notably, they were correlated only in patients who achieved ROSC.

Value of capnography to predict defibrillation success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Unsuccessful defibrillation shocks adversely affect survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform analysis is the tool-of-choice for the non-invasive prediction of shock success, but surrogate markers of perfusion like end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) could improve the prediction. The aim of this study was to evaluate EtCO2 as predictor of shock success, both individually and in combination with VF-waveform analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total 514 shocks from 214 OHCA patients (75 first shocks) were analysed. For each shock three predictors of defibrillation success were automatically calculated from the device files: two VF-waveform features, amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) and fuzzy entropy (FuzzyEn), and the median EtCO2 (MEtCO2) in the minute before the shock. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated, for each predictor individually and for the combination of MEtCO2 and VF-waveform predictors. Separate analyses were done for first shocks and all shocks.

RESULTS

MEtCO2 in first shocks was significantly higher for successful than for unsuccessful shocks (31mmHg/25mmHg, p<0.05), but differences were not significant for all shocks (32mmHg/29mmHg, p>0.05). MEtCO2 predicted shock success with an AUC of 0.66 for first shocks, but was not a predictor for all shocks (AUC 0.54). AMSA and FuzzyEn presented AUCs of 0.76 and 0.77 for first shocks, and 0.75 and 0.75 for all shocks. For first shocks, adding MEtCO2 improved the AUC of AMSA and FuzzyEn to 0.79 and 0.83, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MEtCO2 predicted defibrillation success only for first shocks. Adding MEtCO2 to VF-waveform analysis in first shocks improved prediction of shock success. VF-waveform features and MEtCO2 were automatically calculated from the device files, so these methods could be introduced in current defibrillators adding only new software.

A method to differentiate between ventricular fibrillation and asystole during chest compressions using artifact-corrupted ECG alone

In recent years, numerous adaptive filtering techniques have been developed to suppress the chest compression (CC) artifact for reliable analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm without CC interruption. Unfortunately, the result of rhythm diagnosis during CCs is still unsatisfactory in many studies. The misclassification between corrupted asystole (ASY) and corrupted ventricular fibrillation (VF) is generally regarded as one of the major reasons for the poor performance of reported methods. In order to improve the diagnosis of VF/ASY corrupted by CCs, a novel method combining a least mean-square (LMS) filter and an amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) analysis was developed based only on the analysis of the surface of the corrupted ECG episode. This method was tested on 253 VF and 160 ASY ECG samples from subjects who experienced cardiac arrest using a porcine model and was compared with six other algorithms. The validation results indicated that this method, which yielded a satisfactory result with a sensitivity of 93.3%, a specificity of 96.3% and an accuracy of 94.8%, is superior to the other reported techniques. After improvement using the human ECG records in real cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) scenarios, the algorithm is promising for corrupted VF/ASY detection with no hardware alterations in clinical practice.