Aquablation versus HoLEP in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative prospective non-randomized study

PURPOSE

The question of best surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) remains controversial. We compared the outcomes of aquablation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate ("HoLEP") in a prospective cohort.

METHODS

Patients with BPH underwent aquablation or HoLEP according to their preference between June 2020 and April 2022. Prostate volume ("PV"), laboratory results, postvoid residual volume, uroflowmetry, IPSS, ICIQ-SF, MSHQ-EjD, EES and IIEF were evaluated preoperatively and at three, six and 12 months postoperatively. We also analyzed perioperative characteristics and complications via the Clavien Dindo ("CD") classification.

RESULTS

We included 40 patients, 16 of whom underwent aquablation and 24 HoLEP. Mean age was 67 years (SD 7.4). Baseline characteristics were balanced across groups, except the HoLEP patients' larger PV. IPSS fell from 20.3 (SD 7.1) at baseline to 6.3 (SD 4.2) at 12 months (p < 0.001) without differences between aquablation and HoLEP. HoLEP was associated with shorter operation time (59.5 (SD 18.6) vs. 87.2 (SD 14.8) minutes, p < 0.001) and led to better PV reduction over all timepoints. At three months, aquablation's results were better regarding ejaculatory (p = 0.02, MSHQ-EjD) and continence function (p < 0.001, ICIQ-SF). Beyond three months, erectile, ejaculatory, continence function and LUTS reduction did not differ significantly between aquablation and HoLEP. CD ≥ grade 3b complications were noted in six patients in aquablation group while only one in HoLEP group (p =  < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While aquablation revealed temporary benefits regarding ejaculation and continence at three months, HoLEP was superior concerning operation time, the safety profile and volumetric results.

Will Aquablation Be the New Benchmark for Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Aquablation is included in the European Association Urology guidelines as an alternative surgical technique for prostate resection. The evidence summary states that it is subjectively and objectively as effective as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and enucleation, but concerns remain regarding postoperative bleeding. Our aim was to provide an evidence-based overview of the trials, triumphs, and technical challenges of Aquablation.

METHODS

A literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was performed to identify clinical prospective and retrospective studies and reviews on Aquablation. A total of 54 reports were included. A narrative review of current evidence and an overview of the surgical technique are provided.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Aquablation demonstrates excellent short- and long-term functional outcomes, with a good safety profile comparable to that of TURP. The procedure is efficient and safe, even for very large prostates, with sustained improvements in functional outcomes well maintained up to 5 yr. The unique ability to conduct robotically controlled precise ablation of enlarged tissue while maintaining the sphincter makes Aquablation a very good ejaculation-sparing BPH treatment option. Initial issues with hemostasis have been successfully overcome with the use of gentle bladder-neck cautery after the procedure, allowing for early catheter removal. The above features make Aquablation an attractive minimally invasive technique and show that it is noninferior to holmium laser enucleation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Aquablation is a valid alternative to standard resection techniques, showing excellent long-term functional outcomes, good preservation of sexual function, a good safety profile, and good compliance for all prostate sizes and patient ages. Aquablation is still performed in high-volume centers, but the results can easily be emulated in other centers worldwide.

ADVANCING PRACTICE

Our review indicates that if Aquablation outcomes are emulated globally, this technique could easily become a new benchmark in robotic treatment for BPH.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Aquablation is a safe and effective surgical technique for treatment for benign enlargement of the prostate, with excellent medium-term outcomes. Although long-term studies are needed, the results are promising and challenge the current surgical and laser techniques used to reduce the size of the prostate gland.

Emerging Technologies for the Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) aims at ablating prostate adenoma by resection, enucleation, or vaporisation. Apart from established ablation modes according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, various technologies have emerged as safe/effective alternatives but remain under investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To explore short-term benefits/harms of emerging technologies for surgical management of LUTS/BPO.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL via Ovid up to June 18, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), Rezum, prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) versus sham/transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We included ten RCTs (1108 men). Aquablation versus TURP: insignificant change in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS; mean difference [MD] 0.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.44 to 2.44), quality of life (QoL; MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.21), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax; MD -0.30, 95% CI -3.71 to 3.11), retreatment (risk ratio [RR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.66), and urinary incontinence (UI; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95). PAE versus monopolar TURP (M-TURP): insignificant change in IPSS (MD 3.33, 95% CI -28.39 to 35.05), QoL (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.54), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5; MD 3.07, 95% CI -1.78 to 7.92), and UI (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-2.86), and significant change in Qmax (MD -9.52, 95% CI -14.04 to -5.0), favouring M-TURP. PAE versus bipolar TURP: insignificant change in IPSS (MD -2.80, 95% CI -6.61 to 1.01), QoL (MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.46 to 0.08), Qmax (MD -3.51, 95% CI -8.08 to 1.06), UI (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-2.51), and retreatment (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.19-19.63). PUL versus TURP: insignificant change in QoL (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.09), UI (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-1.05), and retreatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.12-1.86), and significant change in IPSS (MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.22-6.58), and IIEF-5 (MD 3.00, 95% CI 0.41-5.59) and Qmax (MD -9.60, 95% CI -13.44 to -5.76), favouring PUL and TURP, respectively. Rezum and iTIND have not been evaluated in RCTs against TURP to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Supporting evidence for clinical use of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits/harms should be investigated further in high-quality RCTs.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This review summarises the evidence for the clinical use of aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), Rezum, and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) to manage lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. The supporting evidence for the clinical usage of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits and harms should be investigated further in high-quality randomised controlled trials.

Aquablation in men with benign prostate hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of the study is to investigate improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with prostatic Aquablation.

Materials and methods

We performed a literature search of clinical trials using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and retrieved published works on Aquablation for the treatment of BPH up to August 2021. Unpublished works, case reports, conference proceedings, editorial comments, and letters were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Raw means and mean differences were meta-analyzed to produce summary estimates for pre- versus post-International Prostate Symptom Scores, maximum flow rate, and male sexual health questionnaire value changes. An inverse-variance weighted random effects model was used.

Results

Seven studies were included in this review (n = 551 patients) that evaluated various urological parameters. At 3 months, the International Prostate Symptom Scores raw mean difference from baseline was -16.475 (95% confidence interval [CI], -15.264 to -17.686; p < 0.001), with improvements sustained for 12 months. Similarly, maximum flow rate improved by +1.96 (95% CI, 10.015 to 11.878; p < 0.001) from pre to 3 months postoperatively. In addition, the male sexual health questionnaire change pooled effect size was -0.55 (95% CI, -1.621 to 0.531; p = 0.321) from preintervention to postintervention at 3 months. Meta-analyses of some outcomes showed large statistical heterogeneity or evidence of publication bias.

Conclusions

Aquablation seems to improve lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH while providing relatively preserved sexual function. Further research is required to confirm these preliminary results.

Expectations Facing Reality: Complication Management after Aquablation Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Aquablation is a modality recently introduced for surgical treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Large multi-institutional studies have shown a relatively low rate of high-grade (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) complications. Postoperative bleeding primarily depends on prostate volume and approached 8.3% in the initial cumulative experience, for which catheter traction was the predominant hemostatic technique. A systematic and reproducible technique for cautery loop hemostasis has reduced the hemorrhage rate to 1.4%. PATIENT SUMMARY: Aquablation is a surgical treatment option for enlarged prostate glands that are causing urinary problems. This technique uses a water jet to remove prostate tissue and has a relatively low rate of serious complications.

Functional and surgical outcomes of Aquablation in elderly men

PURPOSE

As benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related process, growing interest in surgical management for elderly men has emerged. Recently, Aquablation was approved for treatment of BPH associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and utilizes robotic ultrasound guided surgeon-controlled waterjet ablation. We assessed the differences in functional and surgical outcomes between elderly and young men undergoing Aquablation for BPH/LUTS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed prospectively collected data from the WATER I (NCT02505919) and WATER II (NCT03123250) clinical trials reporting safety and efficacy of Aquablation in the treatment of LUTS/BPH in men 45-80 years with a prostate between 30 and 80 cc, and 80 cc and 150 cc, respectively. Men ≥ 65 years were defined as elderly and men < 65 years as young.

RESULTS

Of 217 patients included, 83 (38.2%) were young and 134 (61.8%) were elderly. Mean age (SD) was 59.3 (± 3.4) years and 71.2 (± 4.2) years for young and elderly men, respectively. At 3 years of follow-up compared to baseline, elderly men showed similar reductions in total IPSS (7.68 points vs 7.12 points, p > 0.05) and similar increases in Qmax (20.6 mL/s vs 19.3 mL/s, p > 0.05) compared to young men. The ejaculatory dysfunction rate was similar for both cohorts (12.0% vs 9.7%, p > 0.05). Elderly men experienced similar annual retreatment rates compared to young men (1.5% vs 0.8% p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly men undergoing Aquablation have similar functional and surgical outcomes as young men. Elderly patient BPH surgical counseling should, therefore, consider Aquablation as a treatment option for LUTS/BPH.

How I do it: Aquablation in very large prostates (> 150 mL)

Aquablation has been well-studied in prostates sizes up to 150 mL. Recently, American Urological Association guidelines distinguish surgical interventions for men with large prostates (80 mL-150 mL) and now very large prostates (> 150 mL). Readers will gain an understanding of how to use Aquablation in the very large prostate size category.

Surgical Complications in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are a variety of treatment options for men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard surgical treatment. The field continues to evolve with the introduction of new energy and laser technologies, increasing adoption of enucleation techniques, in addition to the advent of minimally invasive surgical technologies (MIST) that enable office-based treatments. The choice in surgical management has become very nuanced depending on a variety of patient and anatomic factors. There continues to be high success rates for surgical treatment of BPH; however, the risk profiles vary across the various surgical treatments. We sought to evaluate contemporary series and summarize the experience of complications associated with BPH treatment and management of these complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

A comprehensive literature review was performed, and identified 79 manuscripts, published between 2005 and 2021 characterizing the diagnosis and management of complications following BPH surgery. Commonly cited issues included bleeding, ureteral orifice injury, bladder neck injury, rectal injury, TURP syndrome, bladder neck contractures, urethral stricture disease, refractory OAB symptoms, and complications unique to new modalities of treatment. The practicing urologist has multiple surgical options to choose from in treating patients with symptomatic BPH. The surgical management of BPH is generally well tolerated with high objective success rates that allow for significant improvement in urinary quality of life. It is critical to understand the potential complications associated with these various treatment options, which will enable trainees and practicing urologists to better counsel patients and manage these potential complications.

Five-year outcomes for Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a double-blind, randomized trial in men with LUTS due to BPH

INTRODUCTION

To determine if Aquablation therapy can maintain long term effectiveness in treating men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with a baseline prostate volume between 30 and 80 mL at 5 years compared to TURP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a double-blinded, multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, 181 patients with moderate to severe LUTS secondary to BPH underwent TURP or Aquablation. The primary efficacy endpoint was reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo persistent Grade 1 or Grade 2 or higher operative complications at 3 months. The assessments included IPSS, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and uroflow (Qmax). The patients were followed for 5 years.

RESULTS

The primary safety endpoint was successfully achieved at 3 months where the Aquablation group had a lower event rate than TURP (26% vs. 42%, p = .0149 for superiority). Procedure-related ejaculatory dysfunction was lower for Aquablation (7% vs. 25%, p = .0004). The primary efficacy endpoint was successfully achieved at 6 months, where the mean IPSS decreased from baseline by 16.9 points for Aquablation and 15.1 points for TURP; the mean difference in change score at 6 months was 1.8 points larger for Aquablation (p < .0001 for non-inferiority, p = .1346 for superiority). At 5 years, IPSS scores improved by 15.1 points in the Aquablation group and 13.2 points in TURP (p = .2764). However, for men with larger prostates (≥ 50 mL), IPSS reduction was 3.5 points greater across all follow up visits in the Aquablation group compared to the TURP group (p = .0123). Improvement in peak urinary flow rate was 125% and 89% compared to baseline for Aquablation and TURP, respectively. The risk of patients needing a secondary BPH therapy, defined as needing BPH medication or surgical intervention, up to 5 years due to recurrent LUTS was 51% less in the Aquablation arm compared to the TURP arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement in net health outcomes from Aquablation therapy outweigh those offered by a TURP when considering the efficacy benefit along with the lower risk of needing a secondary BPH therapy and avoiding retrograde ejaculation. Following Aquablation therapy, symptom reduction and uroflow improvement at 5 years have shown to be durable and consistent across all years of follow up compared to TURP. Larger prostates (≥ 50 mL) demonstrated a larger safety and efficacy benefit for Aquablation over TURP.

Learning curve in aquablation: an international multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To describe and analyze the learning curve (LC) of aquablation for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction and determine the number of cases needed to achieve acceptable surgical safety, efficiency, and efficacy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained aquablation databases from France, Lebanon, and Spain was conducted. The combined LC of three surgeons was defined by trifecta and pentafecta outcomes. Trifecta reflected efficiency and safety: operative time < 60 min, hemoglobin reduction ≤ 2 mg/dL, and no 90 day Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications. Pentafecta reflected effectiveness: percent reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and ejaculation preservation. The combined LC was plotted using a moving average with polynomial fitting.

RESULTS

The cohort included 175 consecutive patients. Median (IQR) prostate volume was 70 (50-91) cc, and baseline IPSS was 23 (18-27). The achievement of trifecta exceeded 50% after 4 cases, and 70% after 50 cases. Pentafecta achievement exceeded 50% after 38 cases. Logistic regression showed significant improvement in hemoglobin reduction and ejaculation preservation. Grade ≥ 2 complication was not affected by experience, and neither was 3 month %IPSS reduction as 94% of patients showed ≥ 50% symptoms' improvement.

CONCLUSION

Aquablation is associated with a quick learning curve for the defined trifecta and pentafecta outcomes. It provided effective LUTS relief and low complication rates independent of surgeon experience. Hemoglobin drop and ejaculatory function preservation were the two factors influenced by the surgeons' LC. Training to reduce operative time, standardization of hemostasis techniques, and early assistance to improve veru-protection zone planning are keys to quicker learning.

Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To review and indirectly compare the outcomes of minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search via Medline and Cochrane Central databases was completed for randomized control studies published between January 2000 to April 2020 for the following therapies: Rezum, Urolift, Aquablation, and prostate artery embolization (PAE). Data on the following variables were included: international Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual (PVR). Standard mean differences between treatments were compared through a meta-analysis using transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to assess differences in treatment effect.

RESULTS

No significant difference in outcomes between therapies were noted for IPSS at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Although outcomes for rezum were only available out to 3 months, there were no consistently significant differences in outcomes when comparing Aquablation vs PAE vs Rezum. TURP PVR was significantly better than Urolift at 3-, 6-, and 12 months. No significant differences in minor or major AEs were noted.

CONCLUSION

Although significant differences in outcomes were limited, aquablation and PAE were the most durable at 12 months. PAE has been well studied on multiple randomized control trials with minimal adverse events while aquablation has limited high quality data and has been associated with bleeding-related complications.

Men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH undergoing Aquablation with very large prostates (> 150 mL)

INTRODUCTION

The AUA guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia distinguish treatments based upon prostate volume (PV), particularly for very large prostates (> 150 mL). While the clinical outcomes and benefits of Aquablation have been studied for men with average and large prostates, it is unknown whether this technology can be used for very large prostates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with PV > 150 mL undergoing Aquablation were identified retrospectively from four North American hospitals. The surgical times and clinical outcomes of men with very large prostates (> 150 mL) were compared to data from men with average PV ≤ 80 mL (WATER study) and large PV 80 mL-150 mL (WATER II study).

RESULTS

The average PV of men who underwent Aquablation with very large prostates was 209 mL ± 56 (n = 34, range 151-362 mL), large PV 107 mL ± 20 (n = 101, range 80-150 mL) and average PV 54 mL ± 16 (n = 116, range 30-80 mL). For men with PV > 150 mL, baseline IPSS was 19 ± 6. With a mean follow up of 7 ± 9 months, the IPSS improved to 7 ± 5 (p < 0.001). Peak urinary flow rate, Qmax, improved from 7 ± 4 mL/s to 19 ± 5 mL/s (p<0.001). Compared to the two other PV groups, there were no differences in terms of improvements in IPSS, quality of life, or uroflowmetry. There were no reports of transfusions (0%) in the cohort of men with very large prostates.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we demonstrate that Aquablation is effective and safe in prostates greater than 150 mL while showing consistent outcomes compared to average and large prostates sizes.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Procedures to Treat Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To review and indirectly compare the outcomes of minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search via Medline and Cochrane Central databases was completed for randomized control studies published between January 2000 to April 2020 for the following therapies: Rezum, Urolift, Aquablation, and prostate artery embolization (PAE). Data on the following variables were included: international Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual (PVR). Standard mean differences between treatments were compared through a meta-analysis using transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to assess differences in treatment effect.

RESULTS

No significant difference in outcomes between therapies were noted for IPSS at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Although outcomes for rezum were only available out to 3 months, there were no consistently significant differences in outcomes when comparing Aquablation vs PAE vs Rezum. TURP PVR was significantly better than Urolift at 3-, 6-, and 12 months. No significant differences in minor or major AEs were noted.

CONCLUSION

Although significant differences in outcomes were limited, aquablation and PAE were the most durable at 12 months. PAE has been well studied on multiple randomized control trials with minimal adverse events while aquablation has limited high quality data and has been associated with bleeding-related complications.

Rectal perforation after aquablation of the prostate: lessons learned the hard way

INTRODUCTION

Transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy have been the standard of care for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) over decades. New emerging techniques for the surgical management of BPO have been currently introduced, but might be associated with new, unusual complications.

METHODS

We herewith report on two patients with a rectal perforation after aquablation treatment of BPO.

RESULTS

In the first case, the diagnosis was made 2 days after the aquablation procedure due to unspecific postoperative symptoms. A complex combined open/endoscopic repair of the defect was carried out thereafter. As a consequence, a rectoscopy was routinely performed since then following each aquablation procedure. In the second case, intraoperative rectoscopy after uneventful aquablation revealed the rectal perforation. The perforation was clipped immediately with an over the scope-clip by colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

These two cases of a rectal perforation after aquablation of the prostate demonstrate an unusual complication and its complex management. Diagnostic delay complicates its treatment. Therefore, immediate rectoscopy should be performed routinely after the aquablation procedure.

Current surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia and impression of new surgical modalities

Background:

Surgery is considered the most effective treatment for Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and Transurethral resection of prostat (TURP) is considered the gold standard. The goal of this study is to assess the surgical interventions used in Saudi Arabia, the difference in surgical procedures done depending on age and years of experience and the participant's impression on the new modalities in the management of BPH.

Methodology:

An online survey using Google Forms was sent to the participants. The data were collected during Saudi Urological Association Annual Meeting February 2019. Additional data were gathered 2 months later. The study was closed in May 2019. No incentives were provided to participants.

Results:

A total of 65 (54.1% response rate) urologist participated in the survey, of whom 41.5% of respondents were aged <40 years, while 40% of them aged between 40 and 60 years. Forty-seven (72.3%) out of 65 were consultants. The essential investigations used by most participants prior to surgical interventions are prostate specific antigen, urine culture, urinalysis, and abdominal ultrasound. The most used surgical interventions are unipolar transurethral resection (TURP), Bipolar TURP, and open prostatectomy. About 50% of respondents preferred open prostatectomy for prostate size above 100 g. In general, 40%–50% of participants believe that urethral lift, Rezum, Aquablation, prostate artery embolization, and robotic simple prostatectomy are useful options.

Conclusion:

TURP continues to be the main intervention for prostate sizes <100 g. Open prostatectomy is widely used intervention for prostate sizes more than 100 g. New modalities gained little acceptance among urologist practicing in Saudi Arabia. Hands on workshops may help in educating urologists and introduce these new modalities for the future use.

WATER versus WATER II 2-Year Update: Comparing Aquablation Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in 30-80-cm3 and 80-150-cm3 Prostates

Background

Surgical options are limited when treating large (>80 cm³) prostates for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Open simple prostatectomy remains the most common procedure performed for large prostates. There is a need for novel surgical approaches with shorter learning curves and effective treatment. Aquablation could be this novel tool.

Objective

To compare the outcome of Aquablation for 30-80-cm³ prostates with the outcome for 80-150-cm³ prostates at 2-yr follow-up.

Design setting and participants

We used data from two trials. WATER is a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, international clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Aquablation and transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of LUTS/BPH in men aged 45-80 yr with a prostate of 30-80 cm³. WATER II is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm international clinical trial of Aquablation in men with a prostate of 80-150 cm³.

Intervention

Aquablation, an ultrasound-guided, robotically executed waterjet ablative procedure.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

We compared 24-mo outcomes between 116 WATER and 101 WATER II study subjects. Student's t test or a Wilcoxon test was used to compare continuous variables and Fisher's test for categorical variables.

Results and limitations

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) reductions at 24 mo was 14.5 points for WATER and 17.4 points for WATER II (p = 0.31). At baseline, the maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max) was 9.4 and 8.7 cm³/s in WATER and WATER II, improving to 20.5 and 18.2 cm³/s, respectively (p = 0.60) at 24 mo. Improvements in both IPSS and Q_max were immediate and sustained throughout follow-up. At 2 yr, the surgical retreatment rate was 4% in WATER and 2% in WATER II.

Conclusions

Aquablation is effective in patients with a prostate of 30-80 cm³ and patients with a prostate of 80-150 cm³ treated for LUTS/BPH, with comparable outcomes in both groups. It has low complication and retreatment rates at 2 yr of follow-up, with durable improvements in functional outcome.

Patient summary

Outcomes of Aquablation for both small-to-moderately-sized and large prostates are similar and sustainable at 2 yr of follow-up.

An Indirect Comparison of Newer Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Network Meta-Analysis Model

Objective: This study was designed to provide an indirect comparison of the urinary and sexual domain outcomes and complications after newer minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) of Aquablation, Rezum, and UroLift for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, in December 2019. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that reported outcomes after treatment of BPH for prostate less than 80 g with Aquablation, Rezum, or UroLift were included in the analysis. Results: A total of four RCTs reporting the outcomes after treatment with newer MIST for BPH were identified. Patients undergoing the resective procedures, that is, TURP and Aquablation, had greater improvement in urinary domain outcomes: International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak flow rate, and postvoiding residual compared to patients undergoing nonresective procedures: UroLift and Rezum. Patients in UroLift group maintained a higher sexual function domain score compared to TURP, but not Aquablation. Our multiple comparison analysis did not reveal a significant difference in urinary and sexual domain scores between patients undergoing UroLift and Rezum at 24 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Aquablation and TURP necessitate general or regional anesthesia and both produced significantly better urinary domain scores compared to Rezum and UroLift. On the other hand, UroLift demonstrated better sexual function domain scores compared to TURP, but not Aquablation. There was no significant difference in urinary domain scores between UroLift and Rezum at 24 months of follow-up.

How can we Preserve Sexual Function after Ablative Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

Our aim was to provide a narrative review regarding the prevalence, the associated pathophysiologic pathways and the potential management methods of sexual dysfunction related to ablative surgical techniques for Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE). Men suffering from BPE are at high risk of sexual dysfunction due to the disease itself, comorbidities, and pharmacological/surgical treatments. Transurethral resection of the prostate, as the gold standard treatment option for BPE, has historically been associated with relatively high rates of postoperative sexual dysfunction problems, mainly retrograde ejaculation but also erectile dysfunction. Ablative surgical techniques, including photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), Transurethral Microwave Therapy (TUMT), Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation (Rezum®) and Aquablation®, have been proposed as treatment methods able to reduce treatment-related complications for BPE patients, including adverse effects on erectile and ejaculatory function, without compromising the efficacy rates for BPE. The neurovascular bundles can be damaged during TURP due to posterolateral capsular perforation. Ablative techniques and especially PVP theoretically seem to skip this hazard, as the distance created from the necrotic area to the capsule is generally larger compared to the distance induced after TURP. However, indirect thermal injury of erectile nerves, which could also be induced by the majority of available ablative techniques, could potentially lead to ED. Two special technical characteristics (physiological saline use for tissue ablation and real time penetration depth control) of Aquablation® could be proved beneficial with regard to the effect of the method on erectile function. In general, ablative techniques seem to have a minor impact on sexual function. However, low methodological quality characterizes most of the studies included in this review mainly due to the impossibility, in many cases, to perform blind randomization. Also, many studies did not have an erectile and ejaculatory function as primary outcomes limiting that way their statistical power to identify significant variations. Management of sexual dysfunction problems arising from ablative surgeries for BPE treatment could be divided into two levels. Firstly, intraoperatively the avoidance of manipulation of crucial structures regarding ejaculatory (bladder neck or ejaculatory ducts) and erectile function (neurovascular bundles) could possibly decrease the negative effect of these procedures on sexual function. Thus, in this direction, modifications of classic ablative techniques have been proposed resulting in encouraging outcomes regarding postoperative sexual function. Secondly, if EjD and/or ED are established, the already known treatment choices should be chosen in order for sexual function rehabilitation to be achieved. Thus, regarding ED: PDE5i daily or on-demand remains the gold standard first-line treatment choice followed by intracavernosal alprostadil injections in cases of failure, while penile prosthesis implantation must be kept as the final definitive solution when all the other methods have failed. Regarding ejaculation disorders (retrograde ejaculation or anejaculation): medical therapy with a-agonists (pseudoephedrine), sperm retrieval from the urine, bladder neck reconstruction, prostatic massage, electroejaculation, penile vibratory stimulation and surgical sperm retrieval are the available treatment options. Furthermore, high-quality studies are required to investigate the potential side effects of BPE surgery on sexual function and efficient treatment methods to manage them.

Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Prostatic Urethral Lift Successfully Treated with Water Jet Ablation of the Prostate: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: We describe a patient who underwent waterjet ablation of the prostate after an unsuccessful prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure. Case Presentation: After PUL, our patient had incomplete bladder emptying with a postvoid residual of 600 mL. Urodynamic study of the bladder suggested detrusor underactivity. Our patient was motivated to undergo a salvage bladder outlet surgery. At 3 months after Aquablation, he reported complete resolution of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Conclusion: This case report illustrates return of volitional voiding and significant improvement in LUTS after salvage bladder outlet treatment with waterjet ablation of the prostate.

Review of Sexual Preservation After Novel Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatment Modalities From Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Traditional benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment options, such as transurethral resection of the prostate and laser, have focused on addressing urinary symptoms for men; however, these options are associated with a high risk of sexual dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess newer technologies (Aquablation therapy, UroLift, and Rezum) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the impact of preserving sexual function compared with transurethral resection of the prostate.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of Food and Drug Administration randomized studies from each of the technologies was carried out. A comparison of 3-year outcomes for International Index of Erectile Function-5 and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Function domain short form was analyzed.

RESULTS

Aquablation and prostatic urethral lift were the only therapies to show permanent sexual function preservation in both Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Function domain short form (ejaculatory function) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (erectile function) at 3 years after treatment.

CONCLUSION

For prostates less than 80 cc, Aquablation and prostatic urethral lift were able to demonstrate permanent sexual function preservation in both Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Function domain short form (ejaculatory function) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (erectile function) at 3 years after treatment. Bhojani N, Yafi FA, Misrai V, et al. Review of Sexual Preservation After Novel Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatment Modalities From Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trials. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:169-173.

Aquablation for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Large Volume Prostate with an Intravesical Median Lobe

Background: Aquablation is a relatively new minimally invasive technology for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has shown significant promise in its clinical efficacy and utility. Larger prostates or prostates with a median lobe are a common limitation to other minimally invasive treatment options. There is evidence that Aquablation maintains efficacy for larger prostates and prostates with an intravesical median lobe. Herein, we describe 3-month follow-up results for a patient who underwent Aquablation for a large prostate with a significant intravesical median lobe. Case: Our patient is a 72-year-old man with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH refractory to pharmacotherapy. Patient underwent Aquablation of the prostate, which was 110 cc in volume and had a large intravesical median lobe component. At 3-month follow-up patient had reduction in his AUA-SS from 21 to 12, improvement in uroflow from 8.2 to 16 mL/second, and improvement in postvoid residual from 90 to 13 mL. Conclusion: Aquablation has been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of BPH in patients with large prostates and intravesical median lobes. This case report further demonstrates effective treatment for patients who fit this profile.

A Systematic Review of Reported Ejaculatory Dysfunction in Clinical Trials Evaluating Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for BPH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the sexual outcomes following the novel minimally invasive surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia- (BPH-) related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with an emphasis on ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD).

RECENT FINDINGS

A database search with a 10-year time restriction was carried out until February 20, 2020 using MEDLINE through the PubMed Platform evaluating minimally invasive treatment modalities for BPH and their effect on EjD. After the article selection, we retrieved data for men randomized in 19 different studies with results in 40 separate published articles investigating minimally invasive BPH surgery and reporting EjD rates. To date, water vapor thermal therapy or Rezūm, prostatic urethral lift (PUL) or UroLift®, prostate artery embolization (PAE), and Aquablation showed acceptable rates (< 2%) of retrograde ejaculation by 1 year and had very low adverse events related to the procedure. Both PUL and Rezūm demonstrated lower rates when compared with PAE and Aquablation. With comparable sexual side effect profiles postoperatively, clinicians may determine which therapeutic modality is optimal for patients based on efficacy and cost-benefit. Further randomized clinical trials are required to directly compare the effect of novel minimally invasive surgical procedures for BPH-related LUTS on ejaculation and sexual function.

Informative value of histological assessment of tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate

PURPOSE

To determine the histological validity of the tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prostatic tissue of 12 patients that consecutively underwent aquablation for benign prostatic enlargement was systematically examined. Histological examination was performed by two experienced uropathologists using a digital slide scanner and slide viewer software (Pannoramic 250 and Case Viewer 2.3, 3D Histech, Hungary). The surface areas of the assessable glands were examined and set in relation to the total surface area of the material available for histology and to the patient's total prostate volume. Examinations were performed analogously in ten consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to facilitate interpretation of the results. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A median of 4.06% (range 1.43-7.5%) of the preoperative total prostate volume (median 64.5 ml (range 40-80 ml)) was obtained for histological examination by aquablation. Due to severe mechanical destruction and fragmentation, only a proportion of 0.43% (0.06-1.79%) of this tissue represented histologically assessable glands. Therefore, roughly 0.017% of the total prostatic volume was available for a reliable histological examination. In comparison, 32.5% (6.67-37.5%) of the total prostate volume was removed by TURP and 22.86% (7.45-40.57%) of this tissue represented informative prostatic glands, corresponding to 7.43% of the total prostate volume.

CONCLUSION

Histological significance of the tissue obtained by aquablation of the prostate is very limited. Costs and effort of the histological examination must, therefore, be weighed critically against the limited informative value.

Reasons to overthrow TURP: bring on Aquablation

PURPOSE

In this review, we will discuss the state of the literature regarding Aquablation, its limitations, and opportunities for its application in the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).

METHODS

A comprehensive review of original research on Aquablation was conducted. Articles related to transurethral resection of the prostate, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate, and simple prostatectomy were reviewed for discussion.

RESULTS

For small-medium prostates (30-80 mL), Aquablation's main advantages include better ejaculatory function and similar functional outcomes compared to TURP. For large prostates (80-150 mL), Aquablation demonstrates shorter operative time and superior ejaculatory function when compared to simple prostatectomy, HoLEP, and Greenlight PVP. In addition, Aquablation displays shorter hospital stays than simple prostatectomy. The integration of software programming and semi-automatic technology increases the reproducibility of the procedure and helps standardize overall outcomes, while also accelerating the learning curve. Its ability to preserve antegrade ejaculation makes Aquablation a very compelling option for sexually active patients. However cost and postoperative bleeding risks remain a concern.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence suggests that Aquablation is a safe and effective alternative for BPE for small to large prostates. Further prospective clinical trials, with comparisons to other BPE modalities, and data from longer follow-up periods are still required.

The New American Urological Association Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Clinical Guidelines: 2019 Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this paper was to analyze the efficacy of the current modalities available to surgically treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been significant surgical advancements for the treatment of BPH, including an increasing development and utilization of minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs). These procedures have varying outcomes that are critical to understand. In addition, MISTs have important adverse effects, though have minimized effects on sexual function when compared to more invasive surgical techniques. It is important for all urologists to be familiar with the surgical techniques available to treat BPH and the updated American Urological Association (AUA) Guidelines. Further studies evaluating efficacy, safety, and sexual functioning will help guide care in the future and evolve practice.

Operative time comparison of aquablation, greenlight PVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP

INTRODUCTION

The BPH surgical armamentarium is composed of a rapidly expanding number of technologies and techniques. These include greenlight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP), greenlight enucleation of the prostate (GreenLEP), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and, more recently, the aquablation procedure. To the best of our knowledge, no direct comparison in operative time has been performed.

METHODS

Data for this study were pooled from five sources. For aquablation, patient-level data from four studies of the aquablation procedure were provided by the device manufacturer as well as from a high-volume commercial user. PVP, GreenLEP, HoLEP, and ThuLEP were performed by high-volume, experienced experts. Endpoints included total operative time, resection time, and proportion of total operative time for resection. General linear models were used to evaluate the relationship between prostate volume (or other continuous predictors) and procedure time.

RESULTS

Total procedure time was related to prostate size. Except for the small prostate size range (size < 40 cc), at any given prostate volume, procedure time was highest for PVP, intermediate for LEPs, and lowest for Aquablation. The relationship between procedure time and prostate size (i.e., slope of the fitted lines) was 0.16 min/g for aquablation, 0.32 min/g, 0.28 min/g and 0.32 min/g for GreenLEP, HoLEP and ThuLEP, respectively, and 0.63 min/g for PVP.

CONCLUSION

In our analysis of pooled data of multi-surgical techniques and technologies, aquablation provided the lowest operative time across all prostate volumes. PVP had the longest procedure time for prostates > 40 cc.

Waterjet Ablation Therapy for Endoscopic Resection of prostate tissue trial (WATER) vs WATER II: comparing Aquablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 30-80 and 80-150 mL prostates

Objective

To compare the outcomes of Aquablation in 30–80 mL prostates with those in 80–150 mL prostates. Surgical options, especially with short learning curves, are limited when treating large prostates for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Aquablation (AquaBeam System, PROCEPT BioRobotics Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) could solve this issue with global reproducibility, independent of prostate volume.

Patients and Methods

Waterjet Ablation Therapy for Endoscopic Resection of prostate tissue (WATER [W‐I]; NCT02505919) is a prospective, double‐blind, multicentre, international clinical trial comparing Aquablation and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of LUTS/BPH in prostates between 30 and 80 mL. WATER II (W‐II; NCT03123250) is a prospective, multicentre, single‐arm international clinical trial of Aquablation in prostates between 80 and 150 mL. We compare baseline parameters and 12‐month outcomes in 116 W‐I and 101 W‐II study patients. Students’ t‐test or Wilcoxon tests were used for continuous variables and Fisher’s test for binary variables.

Results

The mean (SD) operative time was 33 (17) and 37 (13) min in W‐I and W‐II, respectively. Actual treatment time was 4 and 8 min in W‐I and W‐II, respectively. The mean change in the International Prostate Symptom Score was substantial averaging (at 12 months) 15.1 in W‐I and 17.1 in W‐II (P = 0.605). By 3 months, Clavien–Dindo grade ≥II events occurred in 19.8% of W‐I patients and 34.7% of W‐II patients (P = 0.468).

Conclusion

Aquablation clinically normalises outcomes between patients with 30–80 mL prostates and patients with 80–150 mL prostates treated for LUTS/BPH, with an expected increase in the risk of complications in larger prostates. Long‐term outcomes of procedure durability are needed.

Prostatic hydroablation (Aquablation): A new effective ultrasound guided robotic waterjet ablative surgery for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are increasingly common amongst ageing men leading to poor quality of life. Surgical treatment options targeted at the obstructing prostate are often required to relief the bladder outlet obstruction, following failure or discontinuation of medical therapies. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the mainstay and gold standard for benign prostate surgery for last few decades. Currently with technological advancements, numerous minimally invasive surgical therapies have been employed to provide effective symptom relief while minimalizing morbidities and preserving sexual function. Prostatic hydroablation (Aquablation) is a new technique which involves high velocity water jets used in non-thermal ablation of the obstructing prostatic tissue robotically delivered by a transurethral cystoscopic handpiece and guided by real time transrectal ultrasound imaging. Recent trials have shown that aquablation is safe and effective in the treatment of symptomatic BPH while maintaining sexual preservation.

METHOD

Aquablation using the Aquabeam system (PROCEPT BioRobotics, Redwood Shores, CA, USA) combines the precision of autonomous robotic execution in delivering high velocity waterjets via a cystoscopic handpiece with accurate anatomical prostatic mapping using real time transrectal ultrasound imaging. The initial part of the surgery involves careful treatment planning tailored to the prostatic anatomy with preservation of important landmarks nearby, then, high velocity waterjet streams are delivered to ablate the obstructing prostatic tissue without use of any heat. Following the ablation and removal of handpiece, a routine cystoscopic bladder washout is performed and haemostasis achieved with balloon tamponade from a 3 way catheter placed under tension empolying a custom designed catheter tensioning device.

RESULTS

Initial studies involving a few case series and a phase II trial demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of aquablation in treatment of symptomatic BPH. Subsequently, a large multicentre international prospective randomised blinded clinical trial (WATER) was conducted to assess the efficacy of aquablation versus TURP. Results from this pivotal trial showed non-inferior symptom relief compared to transurethral prostate resection but with a lower risk of sexual dysfunction. WATER II study was then conducted to assess the safety and feasibility from a multicentre prospective study of aquablation in the treatment of symptomatic large-volume BPH. The results from this study showed that aquablation is feasible and safe in treating men with men with large prostates (80-150 mL).

CONCLUSION

The current landscape of BPH surgical treatment should be individualized with a shared decision- making process based on prostatic anatomy and clinical parameters combined with patient's preferences to select the ideal treatment option for each patient. Aquablation is one such option that involves a robotically delivered hydroablation technique based on individualised real time ultrasonic prostatic mapping that can offer safe and effective treatment for symptomatic BPH while minimising sexual dysfunction. Larger trials with longer follow up data will be required to further validate the long term effectiveness of aquablation.

Efficacy and safety of aquablation of the prostate for patients with symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the contemporary literature on aquablation and evaluate its safety and efficacy for the treatment of symptomatic BPE.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of English language literature was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE and Web of Science libraries up to 24 July 2019 by combining PICO (patient population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) terms. We retrieved 16 studies, including 446 patients treated with aquablation eligible for data extraction and analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing aquablation to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes, three single-center and single-arm studies, three multicenter and single-arm studies, and five subgroup analyses. Aquablation significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-quality of life (IPSS-QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max) and post void residual (PVR) from baseline to last follow-up in all prospective studies. At 2-year follow-up, aquablation showed non-inferior symptom relief compared to TURP, with a lower risk of anejaculation favoring aquablation and no significant differences regarding Clavien-Dindo events. Although a significant hemoglobin drop was reported in all aquablation single-arm studies and when compared to TURP, it did not translate into increased transfusion rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the WATER trial demonstrates that aquablation is comparable to TURP in effectively improving symptom scores and functional parameters related to BPE and bladder outlet obstruction. The evidence provided supports the safety of aquablation assessed by procedure-related adverse events.

Recent advances in prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

This review provides a brief overview of and commentary on currently available technology for the surgical treatment of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia causing lower urinary tract symptoms. This review provides references relevant to review and understand current technology that is clinically available.

The Role of Aquablation for the Surgical Treatment of LUTS/BPH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the potential applicability of a novel, heat-free, and robotically controlled ablative therapy for surgical management of benign prostatic enlargement.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the emergence of new technology to provide personalized care and overcome the complications associated with options such as TURP, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, GreenLight laser, or simple prostatectomy, Aquablation has been studied across a variety of prostate volumes. The functional outcome of Aquablation seems to be uncompromised by prostate volume. The sexual profile seems superior to TURP and the risk of retrograde ejaculation is lower. The robotic system provides a reproducible ablation, independent of prostate volume, without requiring extensive training for performing the procedure. The mean ablation time in the prostate as large as 150 ml does not exceed 9.1 min, and the blood transfusion rates do not seem to be higher than open prostatectomy.

Two-Year Outcomes After Aquablation Compared to TURP: Efficacy and Ejaculatory Improvements Sustained

Introduction

To compare 2-year safety and efficacy outcomes after Aquablation or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

One hundred eighty-one patients with BPH were assigned at random (2:1 ratio) to either Aquablation or TURP. Patients and follow-up assessors were blinded to treatment. Assessments included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), International Index of Erectile Function and uroflow. The focus of analysis was 2-year outcomes.

Results

At 2 years, IPSS scores improved by 14.7 points in the Aquablation group and 14.9 points in TURP (p = .8304, 95% CI for difference − 2.1 to 2.6 points). Two-year improvements in maximum flow rate (Q_max) were large in both groups at 11.2 and 8.6 cc/s for Aquablation and TURP, respectively (p = 0.1880, 95% CI for difference − 1.3 to 6.4). Sexual function as assessed by MSHQ was stable in the Aquablation group and decreased slightly in the TURP group. At 2 years, PSA was reduced significantly in both groups by 0.7 and 1.2 points, respectively; the reduction was similar across groups (p = 0.1816). Surgical retreatment rates after 12 months for Aquablation were 1.7% and 0% for TURP. Over 2 years, surgical BPH retreatment rates were 4.3% and 1.5% (p = 0.4219), respectively.

Conclusion

Two-year efficacy outcomes after TURP and Aquablation were similar, and the rate of surgical retreatment was low and similar to TURP.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02505919.

Funding

PROCEPT BioRobotics.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00952-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of < 100 cc prostates and > 100 cc prostates undergoing aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Surgical options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) become limited when treating large prostates due to steep learning curves and less effective treatment. Aquablation (AquaBeam System, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Inc., USA) could remedy this. We compare the effectiveness of Aquablation in large prostates between 80 cc and 100 cc and very large prostates > 100 cc.

METHODS

WATER II (NCT03123250) is a prospective, multicenter, international clinical trial of Aquablation for the surgical treatment of LUTS/BPH in men of age 45-80 years with prostates between 80 cc and 150 cc. Aquablation was performed using the AquaBeam System. The reported analysis compares the subgroup of patients with a baseline prostate size of < 100 cc versus those with a prostate size of > 100 cc. Students' t test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's test for ordinal/binary variables.

RESULTS

Of 114 screened patients, 101 meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled at 13 US and 3 Canadian sites between September and December 2017. Mean operative time was 31.2 ± 8 min in the < 100 cc subgroup and 41.7 ± 14.9 min in the > 100 cc subgroup. The average length of stay following the procedure for the < 100 cc subgroup was 1.5 ± 0.7 days versus 1.7 ± 1.1 days for the > 100 cc subgroup. Mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life, and IPSS voiding and storage subscores were substantial, occurring soon after treatment and averaging (at 3 months) 16.5, 2.8, 10.6, and 5.8 points, respectively (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Aquablation clinically normalizes outcomes between patients of the < 100 cc and > 100 cc prostate cohorts. It is safe and effective in patients with large prostate glands (> 100 cc) with a smoother learning curve.

[Surgical treatment of BPO: Standard and innovations]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia has dramatically changed in the recent years towards higher proportion of endoscopic treatment and fewer perioperative complications. Nevertheless the question of urinary and sexual quality of life after surgical treatment remains partially unresolved with a high proportion of retrograde ejaculation after conventional surgical treatments. Therefore mini-invasive alternatives to conventional surgery have been proposed. The objective of this literature review was to provide an overview of the alternatives to monopolar TURP currently available in France.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A non-systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted from the PubMed database to retrieve the most relevant scientific publications. A first research was cross-referenced with the results of literature reviews already published and enriched by the authors of this review. A synthesis is proposed for each alternative technique mentioning its level of clinical development, but also its potential advantages and disadvantages compared to conventional surgical techniques.

RESULTS

The quality of life of patients after surgical or interventional management has become the main priority of urologists since the risks of perioperative complication have been reduced by the use of laser or bipolar endoscopic techniques. Thanks to the development of minimally invasive alternatives that are better and better evaluated by randomized trials versus interventional simulation and conventional surgical treatment, more personalized care is possible. Patients' expectations and their individual risk factors can thus be placed at the center of the therapeutic decision and the preoperative information.

CONCLUSION

The surgical and interventional management of LUTS due to BPH has evolved to lower perioperative morbidity with the help of numerous technological developments. Mini-invasive alternatives to standard treatment have also been proposed in order to improve the quality of postoperative sexual life. These alternatives provide significant improvement in LUTS that remains lower than after conventional treatments. Somme of these alternative are also not fully supported by clinical trials, which should urge urologists to act with caution when proposing these alternatives in daily clinical practice.

Pooled Aquablation Results for American Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Large Prostates (60-150 cc)

INTRODUCTION

To present short-term safety and efficacy data of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with Aquablation.

METHODS

Men with LUTs secondary to BPH (60-150 cc) underwent Aquablation treatment from February 2016 to December 2017 across 17 investigational sites in the USA from two contemporary investigational device exemption (IDE) studies called WATER (NCT02505919) and WATER II (NCT03123250).

RESULTS

One hundred seven males with mean age of 67.3 ± 6.5 years were treated with Aquablation; mean prostate volume was 99.4 ± 24.1 cc. The pooled results show that large prostates have an average procedure time of less than 36 min and discharge on average 1.6 ± 1 days. The IPSS decreased by 16.7 ± 8.1 points at 3 months and Q_max increased by 11.2 ± 12.4 ml/s. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 2 or higher event rate at 3 months was 29%. A non-hierarchical breakdown for CD events yielded 18% grade 2 and 19% grade 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

Men with LUTS secondary to BPH (60-150 cc) in a pooled analysis were treated safely and effectively with Aquablation up to 3 months postoperatively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02505919 and NCT03123250.

FUNDING

PROCEPT BioRobotics.

Aquablation of the Prostate for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Early Results

Aquablation is a novel technique for the surgical management of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Following first-in-man studies, a multicenter trial was conducted with results now out to 1 year. Aquablation resulted in a mean International Prostate Symptom Score improvement of 16 points (p < 0.01) and a mean maximum urinary flow rate increase from 8.7 to 18.3 ml/s (p < 0.01) at 12 months. Due to the precise prostate mapping, aquablation has also demonstrated favorable sexual and urinary outcomes with no new erectile dysfunction, retrograde ejaculation, or urinary incontinence as often experienced with other techniques. These improvements in functional outcomes at 12 months confirm that aquablation is a safe and effective alternative for BPH treatment.

Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy: The rise in minimally invasive surgical therapies

The prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) causing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms increases with our ageing population. Treatment of BPH traditionally begins with medical therapy and surgical intervention is then considered for those whose symptoms progress despite treatment. Minimally invasive surgical therapies have been developed as an intermediary in the treatment of BPH with the aim of decreasing the invasiveness of interventions. These therapies also aim to reduce morbidity and dysfunction related to invasive surgical procedures.

Multiple treatment options exist in this group including mechanical and thermo-ablative strategies. Emerging therapies utilizing differing technologies range from the established to the experimental. We review the current literature related to these minimally invasive therapies and the evidence of their effectiveness in treating BPH.

The role of minimally invasive surgical therapies in the treatment of BPH is still yet to be strongly defined. Given the experimental nature of many of the modalities, further study is required prior to their recommendation as alternatives to invasive surgical therapy. More mature evidence is required for the analysis of durability of effect of these therapies to make robust conclusions of their effectiveness.