1
|
Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Kaufman RP, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, Roehrborn CG. Five-year outcomes for Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a double-blind, randomized trial in men with LUTS due to BPH. Can J Urol 2022; 29:10960-10968. [PMID: 35150215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To determine if Aquablation therapy can maintain long term effectiveness in treating men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with a baseline prostate volume between 30 and 80 mL at 5 years compared to TURP. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a double-blinded, multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, 181 patients with moderate to severe LUTS secondary to BPH underwent TURP or Aquablation. The primary efficacy endpoint was reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo persistent Grade 1 or Grade 2 or higher operative complications at 3 months. The assessments included IPSS, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and uroflow (Qmax). The patients were followed for 5 years. RESULTS The primary safety endpoint was successfully achieved at 3 months where the Aquablation group had a lower event rate than TURP (26% vs. 42%, p = .0149 for superiority). Procedure-related ejaculatory dysfunction was lower for Aquablation (7% vs. 25%, p = .0004). The primary efficacy endpoint was successfully achieved at 6 months, where the mean IPSS decreased from baseline by 16.9 points for Aquablation and 15.1 points for TURP; the mean difference in change score at 6 months was 1.8 points larger for Aquablation (p < .0001 for non-inferiority, p = .1346 for superiority). At 5 years, IPSS scores improved by 15.1 points in the Aquablation group and 13.2 points in TURP (p = .2764). However, for men with larger prostates (≥ 50 mL), IPSS reduction was 3.5 points greater across all follow up visits in the Aquablation group compared to the TURP group (p = .0123). Improvement in peak urinary flow rate was 125% and 89% compared to baseline for Aquablation and TURP, respectively. The risk of patients needing a secondary BPH therapy, defined as needing BPH medication or surgical intervention, up to 5 years due to recurrent LUTS was 51% less in the Aquablation arm compared to the TURP arm. CONCLUSIONS The improvement in net health outcomes from Aquablation therapy outweigh those offered by a TURP when considering the efficacy benefit along with the lower risk of needing a secondary BPH therapy and avoiding retrograde ejaculation. Following Aquablation therapy, symptom reduction and uroflow improvement at 5 years have shown to be durable and consistent across all years of follow up compared to TURP. Larger prostates (≥ 50 mL) demonstrated a larger safety and efficacy benefit for Aquablation over TURP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tev Aho
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Thomas
- Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, Wales, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gopal Badlani
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark Plante
- University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Leo Doumanian
- University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alexis E Te
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claus G Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zorn KC, Bidair M, Trainer A, Arther A, Kramolowsky E, Desai M, Doumanian L, Elterman D, Kaufman RP, Lingeman J, Krambeck A, Eure G, Badlani G, Plante M, Uchio E, Gin G, Goldenberg SL, Paterson R, So A, Humphreys M, Roehrborn C, Kaplan S, Motola J, Bhojani N. Aquablation therapy in large prostates (80–150 cc) for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: WATER II 3‐year trial results. BJUI Compass 2021; 3:130-138. [PMID: 35474721 PMCID: PMC8988689 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study is to determine if Aquablation therapy can maintain its effectiveness in treating men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with large‐volume (80–150 cc) prostates at 3 years. Subjects and Methods One hundred one men with moderate‐to‐severe BPH symptoms and prostate volumes between 80 and 150 cc were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, international clinical trial in late 2017. Baseline, procedural, and follow‐up parameters were recorded at baseline and scheduled postoperative visits. IPSS, Qmax, and treatment failure are reported at 3 years. Results The mean prostate volume was 107 cc (range 80–150). Mean IPSS improved from 23.2 at baseline to 6.5 at 3 years (16.3‐point improvement, p < 0.0001). Mean IPSS quality of life improved from 4.6 at baseline to 1.1 at 3 years (improvement of 3.4 points, p < 0.0001). Maximum urinary flow increased from 8.7 to 18.5 cc/s. At 3 year follow‐up, 6% of treated patients needed BPH medication and an additional 3% required surgical retreatment for LUTS. Conclusions Three‐year follow‐up demonstrates a sustained symptom reduction response along with low irreversible complications to Aquablation in men with LUTS due to BPH and prostates of 80–150 cc. Current treatment options available for men with prostates of this size have similar efficacy outcomes but are burdened with high rates of irreversible complications. There are now numerous clinical studies with Aquablation used in various prostates sizes, and it should be offered as an option to men with LUTS due to BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C. Zorn
- University of Montreal Hospital Center University of Montreal Montréal Québec Canada
| | - Mohamed Bidair
- Urology San Diego Clinical Trials San Diego California USA
| | - Andrew Trainer
- Urology Adult Pediatric Urology & Urogynecology, P.C. Omaha Nebraska USA
| | - Andrew Arther
- Urology Adult Pediatric Urology & Urogynecology, P.C. Omaha Nebraska USA
| | | | - Mihir Desai
- Institute of Urology University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Leo Doumanian
- Institute of Urology University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Dean Elterman
- University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | | | - James Lingeman
- Urology Indiana University Health Physicians Indianapolis Indiana USA
| | - Amy Krambeck
- Urology Indiana University Health Physicians Indianapolis Indiana USA
| | - Gregg Eure
- Urology Urology of Virginia Virginia Beach Virginia USA
| | - Gopal Badlani
- Urology Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| | - Mark Plante
- Urology University of Vermont Medical Center Burlington Vermont USA
| | - Edward Uchio
- Urology VA Long Beach Healthcare System Long Beach California USA
| | - Greg Gin
- Urology VA Long Beach Healthcare System Long Beach California USA
| | | | - Ryan Paterson
- Urology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Alan So
- Urology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | | | - Claus Roehrborn
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA
| | - Steven Kaplan
- Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA
| | - Jay Motola
- Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- University of Montreal Hospital Center University of Montreal Montréal Québec Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zorn K, Bidair M, Bhojani N, Trainer A, Arther A, Kramolowsky E, Doumanian L, Elterman D, Kaufman R, Lingeman J, Krambeck A, Eure G, Badlani G, Plante M, Gin G, Goldenberg L, Patterson R, So A, Humphreys M, Kaplan S, Motola J, Desai M, Roehrborn C. Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large prostates (80-150cc): 3-year results. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)00452-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Shore N, Kaplan SA, Tutrone R, Levin R, Bailen J, Hay A, Kalota S, Bidair M, Freedman S, Goldberg K, Snoy F, Epstein JI. Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results. World J Urol 2020; 38:3101-3111. [PMID: 32088746 PMCID: PMC7716857 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03127-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of fexapotide triflutate (FT) 2.5 mg and 15 mg for the treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer. Methods Prospective randomized transrectal intraprostatic single injection FT 2.5 mg (n = 49), FT 15 mg (n = 48) and control active surveillance (AS) (n = 49) groups were compared in 146 patients at 28 U.S. sites, with elective AS crossover (n = 18) to FT after first follow-up biopsy at 45 days. Patients were followed for 5 years including biopsies (baseline, 45 days, and 18, 36, and 54 months thereafter), and urological evaluations with PSA every 6 months. Patients with Gleason grade increase or who elected surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention exited the study and were cumulatively included in the data analysis. Percentage of normal biopsies in baseline focus quadrant, tumor grades, and volumes; and outcomes including Gleason grade in entire prostate as well as treated prostate lobe, interventions associated with Gleason grade increase and total incidence of interventions were assessed. Results Significantly improved long-term clinical outcomes were found after 4-year follow-up, with percentages of patients progressing to interventions with and without Gleason grade increase significantly reduced by FT single treatment. Results in the FT 15-mg group were superior to the FT 2.5-mg dose group. There were no drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Conclusions FT showed statistically significant long-term efficacy in the treatment of Grade Group 1 patients regarding clinical and pathological progression. FT 15 mg showed superior results to FT 2.5 mg. There were no drug-related SAEs; FT injection was well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
| | | | - Ronald Tutrone
- Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard Levin
- Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD, USA
| | | | - Alan Hay
- Willamette Urology, Salem, OR, USA
| | - Susan Kalota
- Urological Associates of Southern Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Three-year outcomes after Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a blinded randomized trial. Can J Urol 2020; 27:10072-10079. [PMID: 32065861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To compare 3-year efficacy and safety after prostate resection with Aquablation therapy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and eighty-one patients assigned to either Aquablation therapy or TURP were followed for 3 years postoperatively. Patients and follow up assessors were blinded to treatment. Assessments included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ-EjD), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and uroflow. RESULTS Over 3 years of treatment, improvements in IPSS scores were statistically similar across groups. Mean 3-year improvements were 14.4 and 13.9 points in the Aquablation and TURP groups, respectively (difference of 0.6 points, 95% CI -3.3-2.2, p = .6848). Similarly, 3-year improvements in Qmax were 11.6 and 8.2 cc/sec (difference of 3.3 [95% CI -0.5-7.1] cc/sec, p = .0848). At 3 years, PSA was reduced significantly in both groups by 0.9 and 1.1 ng/mL, respectively; the reduction was similar across groups (p = .5983). There were no surgical retreatments for BPH beyond 20 months for either Aquablation or TURP. CONCLUSIONS Three-year BPH symptom reduction and urinary flow rate improvement were similar after TURP and Aquablation therapy. No subjects required surgical retreatment beyond 20 months postoperatively. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02505919).
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhojani N, Bidair M, Zorn KC, Trainer A, Arther A, Kramolowsky E, Doumanian L, Elterman D, Kaufman RP, Lingeman J, Krambeck A, Eure G, Badlani G, Plante M, Uchio E, Gin G, Goldenberg L, Paterson R, So A, Humphreys M, Kaplan S, Motola J, Desai M, Roehrborn C. Aquablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Large Prostates (80-150 cc): 1-Year Results. Urology 2019; 129:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
7
|
Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Roehrborn C. Randomized Controlled Trial of Aquablation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-year Outcomes. Urology 2018; 125:169-173. [PMID: 30552937 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report 1-year safety and efficacy outcomes after either Aquablation or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) METHODS: This double-blinded, multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial assigned 181 patients with BPH-related moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms to either electrocautery-based prostate resection (TURP) or Aquablation. Efficacy endpoints included reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score and improvement in uroflow parameters. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo persistent grade 1 or grade 2 or higher complications. RESULTS BPH symptom score improvements were similar across groups with 12-month reduction of 15.1 points after TURP or Aquablation. In both groups, mean maximum urinary flow rates increased markedly postoperatively, with mean improvements of 10.3 cc/s for Aquablation versus 10.6 cc/s for TURP (P = .8632). At 1 year, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was reduced significantly (P < .01) in both groups by 1 point; the reduction was similar across groups (P = .9125). Surgical retreatment for BPH rates for TURP were 1.5% and Aquablation 2.6% within 1 year from the study procedure (P = not significant (NS)). The rate of late complications was low, with no procedure-related adverse events after month 6. CONCLUSION The 1-year outcomes after TURP and Aquablation were similar and the rate of late procedure-related complications was low. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02505919).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neil Barber
- Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tev Aho
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Claus Roehrborn
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lawitz E, Bidair M, Marbury T, Jones CT, Barve A, Magnusson B, Barkan DT, Bodendorf U, Bracken K, Canino E, Chen D, Dabovic K, Heimbach T, Ison M, Jones CL, Kovacs SJ, Lakshman JP, Li B, Raman P, Steiner-Swiat R, Thohan S, Wong KA, Zhong W, Colvin RA. The Safety and Antiviral Activity of BZF961 with or without Ritonavir in Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Clin Ther 2018; 40:1567-1581.e4. [PMID: 30185394 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Infection with hepatitis C virus is the leading cause of infectious disease mortality in the United States. BZF961 is a novel small molecule inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS3-4A protease. Here we present the results of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentered study in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype-1 infection. METHODS Patients were enrolled sequentially in 2 parts and treated for 3days. BZF961 was administered as monotherapy (500mg BID for 3 days) or in combination with the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir to boost its exposure (BZF961 10, 20, or 50mg QD or BID). FINDINGS BZF961 was safe and well tolerated in the patients studied with no serious adverse events. There were no appreciable differences in adverse events among patients who received BZF961, BZF961 with ritonavir, or placebo. There was a significant, clinically meaningful reduction in viral load from baseline in patients treated either with BZF961 500mg every 12hours alone or BZF961 50mg every 12hours in combination with ritonavir. Activity against the hepatitis C virus of the lower-dose regimens was apparent but more modest. There were no relevant changes from baseline viral loads in placebo-treated patients. IMPLICATIONS Coadministration of ritonavir with BZF961 boosted BZF961 exposure (including Cmin, which is the clinically relevant parameter associated with antiviral activity) in a therapeutic range with less variability compared with BZF961 alone. For strategic reasons, BZF961 is no longer under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Lawitz
- Texas Liver Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David T Barkan
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California
| | | | - Kathryn Bracken
- Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Erica Canino
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California
| | - Darlene Chen
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California
| | | | | | - Marjorie Ison
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California
| | | | - Steven J Kovacs
- Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Bin Li
- Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Sanjeev Thohan
- Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Kelly A Wong
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California
| | - Weidong Zhong
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California
| | - Richard A Colvin
- Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Plante M, Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Symptom relief and anejaculation after aquablation or transurethral resection of the prostate: subgroup analysis from a blinded randomized trial. BJU Int 2018; 123:651-660. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Plante
- University of Vermont Medical Center; Burlington VT USA
| | | | - Neil Barber
- Frimley Park Hospital; Frimley Health Foundation Trust; Surrey UK
| | | | | | | | - Tev Aho
- Addenbrooke's Hospital; Cambridge University Hospitals; Cambridge UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Trainer
- Adult Pediatric Urology and Urogynecology, P.C.; Omaha NE USA
| | - Andrew Arther
- Adult Pediatric Urology and Urogynecology, P.C.; Omaha NE USA
| | - Gopal Badlani
- Wake Forest School of Medicine; Winston-Salem NC USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- Institute of Urology; University of Southern California; Los Angeles CA USA
| | - Leo Doumanian
- Institute of Urology; University of Southern California; Los Angeles CA USA
| | | | | | - Claus Roehrborn
- Department of Urology; UT Southwestern Medical Center; University of Texas Southwestern; Dallas TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shore N, Tutrone R, Efros M, Bidair M, Wachs B, Kalota S, Freedman S, Bailen J, Levin R, Richardson S, Kaminetsky J, Snyder J, Shepard B, Goldberg K, Hay A, Gange S, Grunberger I. Fexapotide triflutate: results of long-term safety and efficacy trials of a novel injectable therapy for symptomatic prostate enlargement. World J Urol 2018; 36:801-809. [PMID: 29380128 PMCID: PMC5916987 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2185-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE These studies were undertaken to determine if fexapotide triflutate 2.5 mg transrectal injectable (FT) has significant long-term (LT) safety and efficacy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS Two placebo controlled double-blind randomized parallel group trials with 995 BPH patients at 72 sites treated 3:2 FT:placebo, with open-label FT crossover (CO) re-injection in 2 trials n = 344 and long-term follow-up (LF) 2-6.75 years (mean 3.58 years, median 3.67 years; FT re-injection CO mean 4.27 years, median 4.42 years) were evaluated. 12 months post-treatment patients elected no further treatment, approved oral medications, FT, or interventional treatment. Primary endpoint variable was change in Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months and at LF. CO primary co-endpoints were 3-year incidence of (1) surgery for BPH in FT treated CO patients versus patients crossed over to oral BPH medications and (2) surgery or acute urinary retention in FT-treated CO placebo patients versus placebo patients crossed over to oral BPH medications. 28 CO secondary endpoints assessed surgical and symptomatic outcomes in FT reinjected patients versus conventional BPH medication CO and control subgroups at 2 and 3 years. RESULTS FT injection had no significant safety differences from placebo. LF IPSS change from baseline was higher in FT treated patients compared to placebo (median FT group improvement - 5.2 versus placebo - 3.0, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of AUR (1.08% p = 0.0058) and prostate cancer (PCa) (1.1% p = 0.0116) were both reduced in FT treated patients. LF incidence of intervention for BPH was reduced in the FT group versus oral BPH medications (8.08% versus 27.85% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of intervention or AUR in placebo CO group with FT versus placebo CO group with oral medications was reduced (6.07% versus 33.3% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). 28/28 secondary efficacy endpoints were reached in LF CO re-injection studies. CONCLUSIONS FT 2.5 mg is a safe and effective transrectal injectable for LT treatment of BPH. FT treated patients also had reduced need for BPH intervention, and reduced incidence of PCa and AUR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
| | - Ronald Tutrone
- Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Barton Wachs
- Atlantic Urology Medical Group, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Susan Kalota
- Urological Associates of Southern Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Richard Levin
- Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Barry Shepard
- Urological Surgeons of Long Island, Garden City, NY, USA
| | | | - Alan Hay
- Willamette Urology, Salem, OR, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaye KS, Bhowmick T, Metallidis S, Bleasdale SC, Sagan OS, Stus V, Vazquez J, Zaitsev V, Bidair M, Chorvat E, Dragoescu PO, Fedosiuk E, Horcajada JP, Murta C, Sarychev Y, Stoev V, Morgan E, Fusaro K, Griffith D, Lomovskaya O, Alexander EL, Loutit J, Dudley MN, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018; 319:788-799. [PMID: 29486041 PMCID: PMC5838656 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination carbapenem/beta-lactamase inhibitor and a potential treatment for severe drug-resistant gram-negative infections. OBJECTIVE To evaluate efficacy and adverse events of meropenem-vaborbactam in complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), including acute pyelonephritis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Phase 3, multicenter, multinational, randomized clinical trial (TANGO I) conducted November 2014 to April 2016 and enrolling patients (≥18 years) with complicated UTI, stratified by infection type and geographic region. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive meropenem-vaborbactam (2g/2g over 3 hours; n = 274) or piperacillin-tazobactam (4g/0.5g over 30 minutes; n = 276) every 8 hours. After 15 or more doses, patients could be switched to oral levofloxacin if they met prespecified criteria for improvement, to complete 10 days of total treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary end point for FDA criteria was overall success (clinical cure or improvement and microbial eradication composite) at end of intravenous treatment in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Primary end point for European Medicines Agency (EMA) criteria was microbial eradication at test-of-cure visit in the microbiologic modified ITT and microbiologic evaluable populations. Prespecified noninferiority margin was -15%. Because the protocol prespecified superiority testing in the event of noninferiority, 2-sided 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS Among 550 patients randomized, 545 received study drug (mean age, 52.8 years; 361 [66.2%] women; 374 [68.6%] in the microbiologic modified ITT population; 347 [63.7%] in the microbiologic evaluable population; 508 [93.2%] completed the trial). For the FDA primary end point, overall success occurred in 189 of 192 (98.4%) with meropenem-vaborbactam vs 171 of 182 (94.0%) with piperacillin-tazobactam (difference, 4.5% [95% CI, 0.7% to 9.1%]; P < .001 for noninferiority). For the EMA primary end point, microbial eradication in the microbiologic modified ITT population occurred in 128 of 192 (66.7%) with meropenem-vaborbactam vs 105 of 182 (57.7%) with piperacillin-tazobactam (difference, 9.0% [95% CI, -0.9% to 18.7%]; P < .001 for noninferiority); microbial eradication in the microbiologic evaluable population occurred in 118 of 178 (66.3%) vs 102 of 169 (60.4%) (difference, 5.9% [95% CI, -4.2% to 16.0%]; P < .001 for noninferiority). Adverse events were reported in 106 of 272 (39.0%) with meropenem-vaborbactam vs 97 of 273 (35.5%) with piperacillin-tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with complicated UTI, including acute pyelonephritis and growth of a baseline pathogen, meropenem-vaborbactam vs piperacillin-tazobactam resulted in a composite outcome of complete resolution or improvement of symptoms along with microbial eradication that met the noninferiority criterion. Further research is needed to understand the spectrum of patients in whom meropenem-vaborbactam offers a clinical advantage. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02166476.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith S. Kaye
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Tanaya Bhowmick
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Symeon Metallidis
- Department of First Internal Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Susan C. Bleasdale
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago
| | - Olexiy S. Sagan
- Department of Urology, Regional Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhizhia, Zaporizhizhia, Ukraine
| | - Viktor Stus
- Department of Urology, Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Dnipro
| | - Jose Vazquez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta
| | - Valerii Zaitsev
- Clinical Studies Department, Bucovinian State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine
| | | | - Erik Chorvat
- Department of Urology, Urologicke Oddelenie NSP, Poprad, Slovak Republic
| | | | - Elena Fedosiuk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nephrology and Hemocorrection, Brest Regional Hospital, Brest, State Republic of Belarus
| | - Juan P. Horcajada
- Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Resaearch Group (IPAR)—Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigaciones Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Murta
- Department of Infection Control Service, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Yaroslav Sarychev
- Department of Urology with Forensic Medicine, Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, Poltava, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bidair M. 194 The WATER Study Sexual Function Results – A Phase III blinded randomized parallel group trial of Aquablation vs. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate with Blinded Outcome Assessment for Moderate-to-Severe LUTS in men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Sex Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.11.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
13
|
Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. WATER: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Aquablation ® vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol 2018; 199:1252-1261. [PMID: 29360529 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared the safety and efficacy of Aquablation and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a double-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial 181 patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent transurethral prostate resection or Aquablation. The primary efficacy end point was the reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score at 6 months. The primary safety end point was the development of Clavien-Dindo persistent grade 1, or 2 or higher operative complications. RESULTS Mean total operative time was similar for Aquablation and transurethral prostate resection (33 vs 36 minutes, p = 0.2752) but resection time was lower for Aquablation (4 vs 27 minutes, p <0.0001). At month 6 patients treated with Aquablation and transurethral prostate resection experienced large I-PSS improvements. The prespecified study noninferiority hypothesis was satisfied (p <0.0001). Of the patients who underwent Aquablation and transurethral prostate resection 26% and 42%, respectively, experienced a primary safety end point, which met the study primary noninferiority safety hypothesis and subsequently demonstrated superiority (p = 0.0149). Among sexually active men the rate of anejaculation was lower in those treated with Aquablation (10% vs 36%, p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS Surgical prostate resection using Aquablation showed noninferior symptom relief compared to transurethral prostate resection but with a lower risk of sexual dysfunction. Larger prostates (50 to 80 ml) demonstrated a more pronounced superior safety and efficacy benefit. Longer term followup would help assess the clinical value of Aquablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neil Barber
- Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Tev Aho
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Thomas
- Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, Wales, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Andrew Trainer
- Adult Pediatric Urology and Urogynecology, P.C., Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Andrew Arther
- Adult Pediatric Urology and Urogynecology, P.C., Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Gopal Badlani
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Mark Plante
- University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Mihir Desai
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leo Doumanian
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alexis E Te
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | - Claus Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sanda MG, Feng Z, Howard DH, Tomlins SA, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW, Regan MM, Groskopf J, Chipman J, Patil DH, Salami SS, Scherr DS, Kagan J, Srivastava S, Thompson IM, Siddiqui J, Fan J, Joon AY, Bantis LE, Rubin MA, Chinnayian AM, Wei JT, Bidair M, Kibel A, Lin DW, Lotan Y, Partin A, Taneja S. Association Between Combined TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 RNA Urinary Testing and Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:1085-1093. [PMID: 28520829 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Importance Potential survival benefits from treating aggressive (Gleason score, ≥7) early-stage prostate cancer are undermined by harms from unnecessary prostate biopsy and overdiagnosis of indolent disease. Objective To evaluate the a priori primary hypothesis that combined measurement of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) RNA in the urine after digital rectal examination would improve specificity over measurement of prostate-specific antigen alone for detecting cancer with Gleason score of 7 or higher. As a secondary objective, to evaluate the potential effect of such urine RNA testing on health care costs. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective, multicenter diagnostic evaluation and validation in academic and community-based ambulatory urology clinics. Participants were a referred sample of men presenting for first-time prostate biopsy without preexisting prostate cancer: 516 eligible participants from among 748 prospective cohort participants in the developmental cohort and 561 eligible participants from 928 in the validation cohort. Interventions/Exposures Urinary PCA3 and T2:ERG RNA measurement before prostate biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures Presence of prostate cancer having Gleason score of 7 or higher on prostate biopsy. Pathology testing was blinded to urine assay results. In the developmental cohort, a multiplex decision algorithm was constructed using urine RNA assays to optimize specificity while maintaining 95% sensitivity for predicting aggressive prostate cancer at initial biopsy. Findings were validated in a separate multicenter cohort via prespecified analysis, blinded per prospective-specimen-collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation (PRoBE) criteria. Cost effects of the urinary testing strategy were evaluated by modeling observed biopsy results and previously reported treatment outcomes. Results Among the 516 men in the developmental cohort (mean age, 62 years; range, 33-85 years) combining testing of urinary T2:ERG and PCA3 at thresholds that preserved 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer improved specificity from 18% to 39%. Among the 561 men in the validation cohort (mean age, 62 years; range, 27-86 years), analysis confirmed improvement in specificity (from 17% to 33%; lower bound of 1-sided 95% CI, 0.73%; prespecified 1-sided P = .04), while high sensitivity (93%) was preserved for aggressive prostate cancer detection. Forty-two percent of unnecessary prostate biopsies would have been averted by using the urine assay results to select men for biopsy. Cost analysis suggested that this urinary testing algorithm to restrict prostate biopsy has greater potential cost-benefit in younger men. Conclusions and Relevance Combined urinary testing for T2:ERG and PCA3 can avert unnecessary biopsy while retaining robust sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer with consequent potential health care cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin G Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ziding Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David H Howard
- Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lori J Sokoll
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel W Chan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Meredith M Regan
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jonathan Chipman
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dattatraya H Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Simpa S Salami
- Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jacob Kagan
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ian M Thompson
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center - San Antonio, Texas
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jing Fan
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, California
| | - Aron Y Joon
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Leonidas E Bantis
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark A Rubin
- Department of Pathology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Arul M Chinnayian
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - John T Wei
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Adam Kibel
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel W Lin
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Samir Taneja
- New York University School of Medicine, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wei JT, Feng Z, Partin AW, Brown E, Thompson I, Sokoll L, Chan DW, Lotan Y, Kibel AS, Busby JE, Bidair M, Lin DW, Taneja SS, Viterbo R, Joon AY, Dahlgren J, Kagan J, Srivastava S, Sanda MG. Can urinary PCA3 supplement PSA in the early detection of prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:4066-72. [PMID: 25385735 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.8505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the limited sensitivity and specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), its widespread use as a screening tool has raised concerns for the overdiagnosis of low-risk and the underdiagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer. To improve early-detection biopsy decisions, the National Cancer Institute conducted a prospective validation trial to assess the diagnostic performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) urinary assay for the detection of prostate cancer among men screened with PSA. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 859 men (mean age, 62 years) from 11 centers scheduled for a diagnostic prostate biopsy between December 2009 and June 2011 were enrolled. The primary outcomes were to assess whether PCA3 could improve the positive predictive value (PPV) for an initial biopsy (at a score > 60) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for a repeat biopsy (at a score < 20). RESULTS For the detection of any cancer, PPV was 80% (95% CI, 72% to 86%) in the initial biopsy group, and NPV was 88% (95% CI, 81% to 93%) in the repeat biopsy group. The addition of PCA3 to individual risk estimation models (which included age, race/ethnicity, prior biopsy, PSA, and digital rectal examination) improved the stratification of cancer and of high-grade cancer. CONCLUSION These data independently support the role of PCA3 in reducing the burden of prostate biopsies among men undergoing a repeat prostate biopsy. For biopsy-naive patients, a high PCA3 score (> 60) significantly increases the probability that an initial prostate biopsy will identify cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Wei
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Ziding Feng
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan W Partin
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elissa Brown
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ian Thompson
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lori Sokoll
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel W Chan
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yair Lotan
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J Erik Busby
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mohamed Bidair
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Samir S Taneja
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rosalia Viterbo
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aron Y Joon
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jackie Dahlgren
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jacob Kagan
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sudhir Srivastava
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Martin G Sanda
- John T. Wei, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Ziding Feng, Elissa Brown, Aron Y. Joon, Jackie Dahlgren, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alan W. Partin, Lori Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Jacob Kagan, Sudhir Srivastava, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Ian Thompson, The University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio; Yair Lotan, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Adam S. Kibel, Harvard University, Cambridge; Martin G. Sanda, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; J. Erik Busby, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC; Mohamed Bidair, San Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA; Samir S. Taneja, New York University, New York, NY; and Rosalia Viterbo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wei JT, Sanda MG, Thompson IM, Partin A, Feng Z, Sokoll L, Groskopf J, Brown E, Lotan Y, Kibel A, Lin D, Taneja S, Viterbo R, Busby E, Bidair M, Kagan J, Srivastava S. Abstract 4451: The NCI Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) urinary PCA3 validation trial. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-4451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Widespread use of PSA screening has raised concerns of overdiagnosis of low risk and underdiagnosis of high grade cancer. This is primarily due to the low sensitivity and specificity of PSA. PCA3, a non-coding large chain ribonucleic acid, is significantly over-expressed in cancer tissue and quantitatively measured by a novel urinary assay. The objective of this NCI EDRN trial was to conduct a comprehensive, independent validation of the PROGENSA PCA3 Assay for the detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: A prospective, PROBE-compliant NCI validation trial was undertaken at 11 clinical sites to evaluate PCA3 positive predictive value (PPV, PCA3 score >60) in the initial biopsy setting and negative predictive value (NPV, PCA3 score <20) in the repeat biopsy setting. PCA3 was obtained prior to biopsy but following an attentive DRE. We hypothesized that PPV for an initial prostate biopsy to be at least 55% and that NPV for a repeat biopsy to be at least 75%. The accuracy of PCA3 in detecting any prostate cancer and secondarily, high grade cancer (Gleason > 7), was compared to PCPT risk calculator through ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: 880 eligible men (mean age 62 years) were enrolled; 305 had a prior negative prostate biopsy. 99% had an informative PCA3 test. For the detection of any cancer, PPV was 80% (95% CI: 0.72 - 0.86) in the initial biopsy group while NPV was 88% (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.93) in the repeat biopsy group. PCA3 performance was superior to PCPT risk estimation and improved upon the detection of any cancer (p<0.006) and high grade cancer (p<0.02) when combined with the PCPT risk model. CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 ability to detect prostate cancer was superior to PCPT risk calculator in both the initial (p < 0.0001) and repeat biopsy setting (p=0.001)Independent validation of PCA3 demonstrated a high PPV in the initial biopsy setting and a high NPV in the repeat biopsy setting. Given the significant improvements in risk estimation over PCPT, PCA3 is expected to greatly enhance clinical decision making.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4451. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4451
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ziding Feng
- 5Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wei J, Sanda M, Thompson I, Partin A, Feng Z, Sokoll L, Groskopf J, Brown E, Lotan Y, Kibel A, Busby E, Bidair M, Lin D, Taneja S, Viterbo R. 2206 THE NCI EARLY DETECTION RESEARCH NETWORK (EDRN) URINARY PCA3 VALIDATION TRIAL. J Urol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
18
|
Zinner NR, Bidair M, Centeno A, Tomera K. Similar frequency of testosterone surge after repeat injections of goserelin (Zoladex) 3.6 mg and 10.8 mg: Results of a randomized open-label trial. Urology 2004; 64:1177-81. [PMID: 15596193 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2004] [Accepted: 07/29/2004] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether testosterone surges occur on repeat injections of 3.6 or 10.8 mg goserelin (Zoladex) depot and, if so, their extent. METHODS Men with prostate cancer for whom hormonal therapy was indicated were randomized to open-label goserelin 3.6 mg every 28 days (n = 129) or 10.8 mg every 84 days (n = 118) for 48 weeks. Serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels were measured before repeat injection on day 1 of each treatment cycle and then on days 4 and 8. Surges were defined in three ways: type 1, simultaneous increase in both testosterone and luteinizing hormone to within the age-specific normal range; type 2, increase in testosterone to within the age-specific normal range; and type 3, elevation in testosterone from less than to greater than the castrate level (greater than 18.5 ng/dL). RESULTS Most patients did not experience a testosterone surge. Two patients (1.8%) in the 10.8-mg group had a type 1 surge after one repeat injection and two (1.6%) in the 3.6-mg group had a type 2 surge after one repeat injection. Type 3 surges occurred after one or more repeat injections in 34 (27.0%) and 20 (17.7%) patients in the 3.6-mg and 10.8-mg groups, respectively (P = 0.065); the mean surge (+/- standard deviation) was 11.2 ng/dL (+/-13.5) and 17.3 ng/dL (+/-24.6), respectively. No patient with a testosterone surge had clinical symptoms of a tumor flare reaction. CONCLUSIONS The testosterone levels were consistently maintained within the castrate range (18.5 ng/dL or less) in most (77.4%) patients receiving long-term 3.6 mg or 10.8 mg goserelin.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The 6/12 AQ hydrophilically coated tapered dilator is a newly developed device for ureteral dilation prior to rigid and flexible ureteroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of this device, it was used to gain ureteral access in 80 consecutive patients undergoing ureteroscopy for diagnostic purposes, stone treatment, or stricture dilation. RESULTS In all 80 cases, the ureteral orifice and intramural ureter were dilated successfully. One complication occurred: an embedded stone was extruded through the ureteral wall. Each dilation procedure using the 6/12 AQ tapered dilator costs 20% of a balloon dilation, a saving of approximately $764 per dilation. CONCLUSION Ureteral dilation with the 6/12 AQ tapered dilator is a safe, effective, and inexpensive alternative to traditional dilation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Gaylis
- San Diego Urology Center, Medical Associates, La Mesa, California 91942, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parsons C, Greenberger M, Gabal L, Bidair M, Barme G. RE: THE ROLE OF URINARY POTASSIUM IN THE PATHOGENESIS AND DIAGNOSIS OF INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS. J Urol 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68973-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
21
|
Parsons CL, Greenberger M, Gabal L, Bidair M, Barme G. The role of urinary potassium in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of interstitial cystitis. J Urol 1998; 159:1862-6; discussion 1866-7. [PMID: 9598476 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63178-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We determined whether intravesical potassium absorption in normal bladders correlates with increased sensory urgency, and corroborated the hypothesis that mucus is important in the regulation of epithelial permeability. We compared sensory nerve provocative ability of sodium versus potassium, and determined whether intravesical potassium sensitivity discriminates patients with interstitial cystitis from normal subjects and those with other sensory disorders of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 231 patients with interstitial cystitis and 41 normal subjects underwent intravesical challenge with 40 ml. water and then 40 ml. of 40 mEq./100 ml. potassium chloride. Subjective responses of urgency or pain stimulation were recorded on a scale of 0 to 5. In 19 normal subjects potassium absorption was measured at baseline, after injury of the bladder mucus with protamine, after heparin treatment to reverse mucus damage and then for a final time. These subjects simultaneously recorded the symptoms of sensory urgency and pain at baseline, after protamine and after heparin. Another group of normal volunteers underwent a challenge with sodium versus potassium to determine which cation was more provocative. Patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), detrusor instability, and acute and chronic urinary tract infection but no current infection were also evaluated for potassium sensitivity. RESULTS Neither normal subjects nor patients with interstitial cystitis reacted to water administered intravesically. There was marked sensitivity to intravesical potassium in 75% of patients with interstitial cystitis versus 4% of controls (p <0.01). Only 1 patient with BPH responded to potassium and none of the 5 with chronic urinary tract infection responded. All 4 patients (100%) with a current acute urinary tract infection reacted positively to the potassium challenge. Of 16 patients with detrusor instability 25% responded. Normal subjects had minimal sensitivity to potassium before (11%) and markedly increased sensitivity after (79%) protamine treatment, and these symptoms were reversed by heparin in 42%. Potassium absorption directly correlated with symptoms (0.4, 3.0 and 1.3 mEq. before and after protamine, and after heparin reversal, respectively). In regard to sodium versus potassium provocation, potassium was far more provocative for causing urgency after protamine (10 versus 90%). Neither group underwent provocation before protamine. CONCLUSIONS Chronic diffusion of urinary potassium into the bladder interstitium may induce sensory symptoms, damage tissue and be a major toxic factor in the pathogenesis of interstitial cystitis. Intravesical potassium sensitivity is a reliable method for detecting abnormal epithelial permeability. It discriminates between patients with interstitial cystitis and normal subjects with intact epithelial function, and it is a useful diagnostic test for interstitial cystitis. Potassium sensitivity correlates with increased potassium absorption in normal subjects, and potassium is far more provocative than sodium. Potassium sensitivity is also present in acute urinary tract infection and occasionally detrusor instability but not in BPH or chronic urinary tract infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Parsons
- Division of Urology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 92103-8897, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Parsons CL, Greenberger M, Gabal L, Bidair M, Barme G. The role of urinary potassium in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of interstitial cystitis. J Urol 1998; 159:1862-6; discussion 1866-7. [PMID: 9598476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We determined whether intravesical potassium absorption in normal bladders correlates with increased sensory urgency, and corroborated the hypothesis that mucus is important in the regulation of epithelial permeability. We compared sensory nerve provocative ability of sodium versus potassium, and determined whether intravesical potassium sensitivity discriminates patients with interstitial cystitis from normal subjects and those with other sensory disorders of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 231 patients with interstitial cystitis and 41 normal subjects underwent intravesical challenge with 40 ml. water and then 40 ml. of 40 mEq./100 ml. potassium chloride. Subjective responses of urgency or pain stimulation were recorded on a scale of 0 to 5. In 19 normal subjects potassium absorption was measured at baseline, after injury of the bladder mucus with protamine, after heparin treatment to reverse mucus damage and then for a final time. These subjects simultaneously recorded the symptoms of sensory urgency and pain at baseline, after protamine and after heparin. Another group of normal volunteers underwent a challenge with sodium versus potassium to determine which cation was more provocative. Patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), detrusor instability, and acute and chronic urinary tract infection but no current infection were also evaluated for potassium sensitivity. RESULTS Neither normal subjects nor patients with interstitial cystitis reacted to water administered intravesically. There was marked sensitivity to intravesical potassium in 75% of patients with interstitial cystitis versus 4% of controls (p <0.01). Only 1 patient with BPH responded to potassium and none of the 5 with chronic urinary tract infection responded. All 4 patients (100%) with a current acute urinary tract infection reacted positively to the potassium challenge. Of 16 patients with detrusor instability 25% responded. Normal subjects had minimal sensitivity to potassium before (11%) and markedly increased sensitivity after (79%) protamine treatment, and these symptoms were reversed by heparin in 42%. Potassium absorption directly correlated with symptoms (0.4, 3.0 and 1.3 mEq. before and after protamine, and after heparin reversal, respectively). In regard to sodium versus potassium provocation, potassium was far more provocative for causing urgency after protamine (10 versus 90%). Neither group underwent provocation before protamine. CONCLUSIONS Chronic diffusion of urinary potassium into the bladder interstitium may induce sensory symptoms, damage tissue and be a major toxic factor in the pathogenesis of interstitial cystitis. Intravesical potassium sensitivity is a reliable method for detecting abnormal epithelial permeability. It discriminates between patients with interstitial cystitis and normal subjects with intact epithelial function, and it is a useful diagnostic test for interstitial cystitis. Potassium sensitivity correlates with increased potassium absorption in normal subjects, and potassium is far more provocative than sodium. Potassium sensitivity is also present in acute urinary tract infection and occasionally detrusor instability but not in BPH or chronic urinary tract infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Parsons
- Division of Urology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 92103-8897, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Percutaneous transperineal cryoablation of the prostate is now available in the armamentarium for treatment of prostate cancer. Technical advances in real-time transrectal imaging of the prostate and improvements in cryosurgical equipment have brought this modality into the limelight of available prostate cancer management. Cryosurgery can be offered to many patients with prostate cancer. However, the main indications for its use include primary treatment for localized disease, salvage therapy after failure of traditional methods, and relief of local symptoms. A historical background, description of the technique, and clinical experience at several medical centers including the University of California San Diego, Allegheny General Hospital, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and Crittenton Hospital, are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B G Patel
- Division of Urology, UCSD Medical Center 92103-8897, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Trinh T, Simonian J, Vigil S, Chin D, Bidair M. Continuous versus intermittent bladder irrigation of amphotericin B for the treatment of candiduria. J Urol 1995; 154:2032-4. [PMID: 7500451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficacy of continuous versus intermittent bladder irrigation with amphotericin B in the treatment of candiduria was compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective, randomized and comparative pilot study was done on 20 patients. Continuous bladder irrigation with 50 mg./l. amphotericin B infused during 24 hours for 2 days was compared to 3 intermittent bladder irrigations of 10 mg./100 ml. amphotericin B in 1 day. Urine cultures were obtained 72 hours after treatment. RESULTS The organism was eradicated in 8 patients (80%) who received continuous irrigation and 3 (30%) who received intermittent irrigation (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Continuous amphotericin B bladder irrigation was superior in terms of efficacy, ease of administration and patient comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Trinh
- Department of Urology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh Trinh
- Department of Urology and Pharmacy, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
| | - Jill Simonian
- Department of Urology and Pharmacy, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
| | - Susan Vigil
- Department of Urology and Pharmacy, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
| | - Dora Chin
- Department of Urology and Pharmacy, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
| | - Mohamed Bidair
- Department of Urology and Pharmacy, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tay HP, Bidair M, Shabaik A, Gilbaugh JH, Schmidt JD. Primary yolk sac tumor of the prostate in a patient with Klinefelter's syndrome. J Urol 1995; 153:1066-9. [PMID: 7853565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Primary yolk sac (endodermal sinus) tumor of the prostate is extremely rare with only 2 cases reported in the literature. We describe a case of primary yolk sac tumor of the prostate in a man with Klinefelter's syndrome. Treatment included 4 courses of combination chemotherapy followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, cystoprostatectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion. We review the association of Klinefelter's syndrome with extragonadal germ cell tumor along with the management of this rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H P Tay
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Howard P. Tay
- From the Division of Urology and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Mohamed Bidair
- From the Division of Urology and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Ahmed Shabaik
- From the Division of Urology and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - James H. Gilbaugh
- From the Division of Urology and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Joseph D. Schmidt
- From the Division of Urology and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The urgency-frequency syndrome (UFS) (non-bacterial cystitis, interstitial cystitis) may well represent a heterogenous group with several etiologies. This study was based on the hypothesis that one subset of UFS patients has a leaky (to solutes) epithelium and cations such as potassium could thereby diffuse subepithelially and provoke symptoms. It was also hypothesized that normal impermeable transitional epithelium would not allow cations to diffuse across the cells during the K+ provocation test and no symptoms would be experienced. If the epithelium was permeable ("leaky"), diffusion would occur and provoke symptoms. Water or 0.4 M KCl was placed intravesically into normal volunteers and interstitial cystitis (IC) patients. Water did not provoke symptoms in either group but KCl provoked 4.5% of normals and 70% of IC patients. Differences were significant (P < 0.0001). This test provides a valuable diagnostic tool for UFS and a valuable research tool to separate epithelial permeability problems from other subsets of patients. A third group, consisting of 11 IC patients in remission on heparinoid therapy, was also tested and only 18% were provoked by KCl. Four patients with radiation cystitis were also examined and all four (100%) were provoked by the potassium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Parsons
- Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center 92103-8897
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Seventy-seven male patients (34 with cervical spine injury, 32 with thoracic spine injury, 9 with lumbosacral spine injury, and 2 with multiple sclerosis) who were referred to our spinal cord injury unit for urologic evaluation had videourodynamic studies using transrectal ultrasound and fluoroscopy. All were studied twice in the same session: first with transrectal ultrasound urodynamics (TRUSU) and the second time with conventional fluoroscopic videourodynamics (VUD). The findings were compared. Efficacy of TRUSU: (1) clearly documented flow of fluid through bladder neck into posterior urethra before clinical leakage occurred per urethra; (2) allowed accurate placement of EMG needle electrodes in external urinary sphincter under visual guidance; (3) provided high-quality imaging of surrounding structures and allowed assessment of bladder neck, prostate, seminal vesicles, and posterior urethra; (4) eliminated radiation exposure to the patient and the examiner, with no time limit imposed on imaging so that repeat studies could be done to evaluate patients on new drug treatments or postoperatively at no increased risks; and (5) its availability to most urologists at their office at considerably less cost to set up than fluoroscopy. In our study TRUSU identified a hypoechoic lesion in the prostate of 1 patient and a tumor in the bladder neck of another patient. Fluoroscopic VUD identified 6 patients with bladder diverticula and 2 with grades 1 and 2 vesicoureteral reflux which TRUSU did not identify. Our experience indicates TRUSU is a valid and preferable alternative to fluoroscopic VUD for patients with spinal cord injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bidair
- Division of Urology, University of California at San Diego
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a common condition requiring surgical intervention during the first few weeks of life. The incidence of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis ranges from 0.13 to 0.4% of live births in the United States, Britain and Scandinavia. Associated anomalies have been described in 6 to 33% of the cases in the central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract and heart. An association of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis with urinary tract anomalies has not been previously documented. A review of 422 patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis revealed urinary tract anomalies in 6 (10 renal units), including 4 renal units with vesicoureteral reflux and 9 with hydronephrosis. This incidence of 1.4% is greater than the 0.2% incidence expected in the general population. This 7-fold increase in urinary tract anomalies in patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis suggests an association between the two and warrants further investigation. Serious consideration should be given to obtaining renal ultrasound examinations in patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bidair
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Magnetic stimulation using an external surface coil induces an electrodynamic field that penetrates various tissues and stimulates peripheral nerves in a similar fashion to conventional electrical stimulation. An 83 mm magnetic surface coil was used to stimulate 11 spinal cord injury (SCI) patients, during which time detrusor activity and evoked potentials of the striated urinary sphincter motor pathways were evaluated. All patients had urodynamic studies and conventional sacral evoked potentials prior to magnetic stimulation. The mean bladder capacity was 337 ml (range 109-590), mean leak point pressure was 50 cm H2O (range 10-80), and mean sacral reflex (afferent-efferent) latency was 37.9 ms (range 25.1-49.3). Eight patients had detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. Magnetic stimulation over the sacral spine at different bladder volumes was performed. Detrusor and striated sphincter responses were recorded during stimulation. In all patients the technique was easy and the results were reproducible. The mean sacral motor pathway (efferent) latency was 27.9 ms (range 18.7-39.6). Using maximal stimulation, no detrusor response was recorded at bladder volumes < 200 ml. However, a detrusor response was recorded in 7 patients (> 10 cm H2O in 2, < 10 cm H2O in 5) when the bladder volume was > 200 ml. No complications were seen. Sacral evoked potential measurements assess the function and integrity of the sacral arc but it does not distinguish between afferent and efferent pathways. Magnetic stimulation is a safe and effective method to assess the integrity and function of the detrusor and striated sphincter motor (efferent) pathways. When combined with sacral evoked potential studies, the sensory (afferent) pathways can be evaluated indirectly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P P Brodak
- Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|