Effect of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir and Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir on Serum Creatinine

Background & objectives

There are reports of worsening renal functions with sofosbuvir, but there are no comparative data of different direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on serum creatinine. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we examined the treatment effect of two commonly used regimens, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), on serum creatinine.

Methods

We included all patients treated with SOF/LDV (n = 825) and GLE/PIB (n = 116) between December 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. An increase of serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL was considered clinically significant. The change of creatinine values from pretreatment to posttreatment between two treatment groups was tested in unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear model, and risk factors associated with creatinine change were assessed. In addition, GLE/PIB-treated patients were matched 1:2 to SOF/LDV-treated patients using propensity scores, and then serum creatinine changes were compared.

Results

The mean baseline creatinine was higher in the GLE/PIB group vs. SOF/LDV group (1.39 ± 1.86 vs. 0.91 ± 0.24, P = 0.007). When compared to baseline, serum creatinine at posttreatment week 4 was significantly higher in SOF/LDV group (0.97 ± 0.4 vs.0.91 ± 0.24, P < 0.001), but there was no significant change in the GLE/PIB group (1.41 ± 1.73 vs. 1.39 ± 1.86, P = 0.52). Overall, there was no significant change in serum creatinine between posttreatment week 4 and week 24 (P = 0.6). Clinically significant increase in serum creatinine was seen in 6% (46/825) of SOF/LDV and 7% (8/116) of GLE/PIB (P = 0.6). The unadjusted and adjusted models indicated that the changes in creatinine from baseline to posttreatment week 4 and week 24 were not associated with the type of DAA combination.

Conclusion

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection with both SOF/LDV and GLE/PIB regimens may result in an increase of creatinine, and 6-7% will have an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL. The increase in creatinine, however, is unrelated to the type of DAA combination.

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Becomes the Leading Indication for Liver Transplant Registrants Among US Adults Born Between 1945 and 1965

BACKGROUND

Improved efforts in screening and treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are expected to reduce its burden among adults on the liver transplantation (LT) waitlist (WL). We aim to evaluate birth cohort-specific liver disease etiology trends in US adults listed for and receiving LT.

METHODS

We evaluated 2005-2016 United Network for Organ Sharing LT registry data to evaluate birth cohort-specific trends in LT WL registrants and recipients in the US. Annual trends in etiology of liver disease at listing were compared between the 1945-1965 birth cohort and the non-1945-1965 birth cohort, were stratified by presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC vs. non-HCC), and were focused on the four leading indications for LT in the US, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), HCV infection, alcoholic liver disease (ALD), and those with combined alcoholic cirrhosis with HCV (HCV/ALD).

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2016, although HCV infection was a leading indication for LT WL registration among the 1945-1965 birth cohort patients until 2015, NASH overtook HCV infection as the leading indication in 2016. When stratified by HCC status, both ALD and NASH surpassed HCV infection as the leading indication among 1945-1965 birth cohort WL registrants without HCC, whereas HCV infection remained the leading indication among patients with HCC. When evaluating trends in patients who received LT, HCV infection remained the leading indication among the 1945-1965 birth cohort patients.

CONCLUSION

In 2016, NASH surpassed HCV infection as the leading indication for WL registration among the 1945-1965 birth cohort patients. Improved HCV screening, increased availability of effective HCV infection treatment, and rising prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease may explain changes in LT indication among this group.

Efficacy And Safety of Sofosbuvir Based Regimens For Treatment of Hepatitis C Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Experience From India

INTRODUCTION

Results of Sofosbuvir based regimens for hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation are available from well-designed clinical trials. Most of the data is from deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) setting, and data on "real world" experience for HCV recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive 78 patients who completed Sofosbuvir based HCV treatment after liver transplantation were included. Following Sofosbuvir based regimens were used; Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin (n = 58), Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 5), Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 15). Treatment was given for 12 weeks (triple therapy) or 24 weeks (dual therapy).

RESULTS

A total of 74/78 (94.8%) patients achieved end of treatment response (ETR) while 4 did not achieve ETR. A total of 68/76 (89.4%) patients achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12). while 2 are waiting for 12 weeks follow up after ETR. Twelve patients had history of failed previous treatment with Peginterferon and Ribavirin after LDLT, all these patients achieved ETR and 11/12 had SVR12. There was no statistical difference in response rates between genotype 1 or 3. Eighteen patients (16 on Ribavirin) had hemoglobin < 8 g/dl; two patients complained fatigue in absence of anemia.

CONCLUSION

Sofosbuvir based regimens are safe and highly effective in treatment of HCV recurrence after LDLT.

Clinical Profile and Response to Treatment with Pegylated Interferon α 2b and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C-A Reappraisal from a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India

AIM

To assess the clinical profile of 80 chronic hepatitis C patients in a tertiary health care center in Northern India and also to study the efficacy and tolerability of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) α 2b and ribavirin therapy in a cohort of chronic hepatitis C patients.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) with genotypes 2 and 3 received Peg-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg subcutaneously weekly plus daily ribavirin 800 mg for 24 weeks .Subjects with genotype 1 infection received therapy for 48 weeks with ribavirin 1000 mg/day and Peg-IFN α 2b dose remained the same. The primary end point was the sustained viral response (SVR). Drug dosage was modified or temporarily discontinued if anemia or bone marrow suppression developed.

RESULTS

The clinical profile of chronic hepatitis C infected patients showed decompensated cirrhosis in the more elderly patients. Genotype 3 was the commonest genotype and was seen in 21 (70%) patients. The mean baseline HCV RNA was high. SVR was achieved less commonly with genotype 1 than with genotype 2/3. Patients who became negative for HCV RNA at 4-weeks (rapid virological response or RVR) and 12 weeks (early virological response or EVR) of treatment showed significantly higher sustained virological response (SVR) rates. Similarly, patients who showed normalization of ALT level at 4-weeks and 12-weeks of treatment showed significant high rate of SVR. Overall treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In our region, CHC subjects have high viral load and genotype 3 being the most common. Treatment with Peg-IFN α 2b and ribavirin is effective and well tolerated. Genotype 1 was more resistant to the treatment. Patients who achieved RVR and EVR are more likely to achieve SVR. Although the numbers of patients in this study was small, considering the paucity of data of treatment from India, the data is relevant.