Unveiling Intricacies of DIEP Breast Reconstruction Post Early Breast Cancer: A Deep Dive into a Case of Unforeseen Complications

In the vast expanse of restorative surgical procedures, the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap, originating from the inferior epigastric artery, has emerged as the preferred method of breast reconstruction, attributable to its myriad advantages. The technique provides reliable vascular supply, robust tissue volume for excision, minimal invasiveness to the donor site, with direct closure and concealment of the said site. This paper embarks on an elaborate elucidation of the DIEP surgical procedure, pivoting on the analytical exploration of a particular instance where necrosis of the skin flap occurred following immediate DIEP breast reconstruction in a patient diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. This patient had previously undergone Nipple Areola Complex Sparing Mastectomy (NSM). We endeavor to extrapolate insights from this singular case of post-NSM DIEP breast reconstruction failure and correlate our findings with current literature dedicated to similar instances of surgical failure in DIEP breast reconstruction.

The Impact of Technical Innovations and Donor-Site Mesh Repair on Autologous Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction-A Retrospective Analysis

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefit that may be achieved through the introduction of technical innovations and the incorporation of mesh for fascial donor site closure in uni- and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue. Methods: A retrospective single-center review of all breast reconstructions with a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap between January 2004 and December 2019 was performed. Donor and recipient site complications and operation times were evaluated before and after the implementation of coupler anastomoses, preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), indocyanine green (ICG) angiography, and the inclusion of mesh in donor site repair. Results: A total of 396 patients were included, accounting for 447 flaps. Operation time was significantly shorter in unilateral reconstructions after the implementation of CTA (p < 0.0001). ICG angiography significantly reduced the rates of partial flap loss (p = 0.02) and wound healing disorders (p = 0.02). For unilateral reconstructions, abdominal bulging or hernia was observed more often in MS1-TRAM flaps without synthetic mesh repair (p = 0.001), whereas conservatively treated seroma developed more frequently after mesh implantation (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Recent technological advancements developed over the past few decades have made a substantial impact on decreasing surgical duration and enhancing procedure safety.

Impact of the withdrawal of macrotextured implant on reconstruction practices

INTRODUCTION

On 22 November 2018, the French Society for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery recommended that Allergan® macrotextured breast implants be recalled, a decision endorsed by the French national health products safety agency (ANSM) on 2nd April 2019. At the Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center (CGFL) in Dijon, we decided to stop using macrotextured implants as of November 2018 in favor of smooth implants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the recall of macrotextured implants on breast reconstruction surgical practices and their complications.

METHODS

This is a single-centre, retrospective study performed at the CGFL in Dijon, France. Reconstruction techniques and complications were compared between two periods, i.e. before the recall of macrotextured breast implants (period 1: 1st September 2017-November 22, 2018) and after the recall (period 2: 23 November 2018-31st March 2020). All patients who underwent breast reconstruction for the first time were included.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 168 reconstructions in period 2, and 159 in period 2. The rate of use of breast implants during reconstructions decreased significantly in period 2 (53.6% vs. 23.9%; P<0.001). The rate of autologous reconstructions increased significantly for muscle sparing latissimus dorsi (2.4% vs. 12.6%; P<0.001) and exclusive fat grafting (9.5% vs. 21.5%; P<0.01). Clavien-Dindo Stage IIIb complications decreased in period 2 (10% vs. 18.4%; P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Since the recall of macrotextured breast implants, the reconstruction rate has decreased in our centre in favor of autologous techniques with lower complication rates.

Serial Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Direct-to-Implant Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

BACKGROUND

Direct-to-implant (DTI) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are the two most common methods of immediate breast reconstruction. This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes between the two methods and to evaluate whether outcomes change over time.

METHODS

The data of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction using DTI or DIEP flaps between July 2017 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who completed the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module at 6 months and > 12 months after reconstruction were analyzed. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare outcome between DTI and DIEP groups, and serial comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

Of 375 patients included in the analysis, 146 patients completed questionnaires > 1 year of follow-up (20.79 ± 8.55 months). The DTI and DIEP groups had 102 (69.9%) and 44 (30.1%) patients, respectively. There were no intergroup differences in the mean scores representing any of the domains at 6 postoperative months. After > 1 year of follow-up, patients who underwent DIEP-flap reconstruction had greater satisfaction with their breast reconstructions (p < 0.001) and greater satisfaction with their overall outcomes (p < 0.001). In the DTI group, satisfaction scores did not change over time in any of the domains. In the DIEP group, however, the mean scores reflecting satisfaction with the breast (p = 0.001), overall outcome (p = 0.045), psychosocial well-being (p = 0.015), and sexual well-being (p = 0.042) significantly increased over long-term follow-up relative to the scores at 6 postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported outcomes improved over time in association with DIEP reconstructions, reflecting higher satisfaction levels than those associated with DTI reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison of Pain Management Strategies to Reduce Opioid Use Postoperatively in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Pain Catheter versus Nerve Block in Addition to Refinements in the Oral Pain Management Regime

Background  Perioperative management in autologous breast reconstruction has gained focus in recent years. This study compares two pain management protocols in patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction: a past protocol (PP) and a current protocol (CP)-both intended to reduce opioid consumption postoperatively. The PP entails use of a pain catheter in the abdominal wound and the CP consists of an intraoperative nerve block in addition to refinements in the oral pain management. We hypothesize that the CP reduces opioid consumption compared to PP. Methods  From December 2017 to January 2020, 102 patients underwent breast reconstruction with an abdominal-based free flap. Two postoperative pain management strategies were used during the period; from December 2017 to September 2018, the PP was used which entailed the use of a pain catheter with ropivacaine applied in the abdominal wound with continuous distribution postoperatively in addition to paracetamol orally and oxycodone orally pro re nata (PRN). From October 2018 to January 2020, the CP was used. This protocol included a combination of intraoperative subfascial nerve block and a postoperative oral pain management regime that consisted of paracetamol, celecoxib, and gabapentin as well as oxycodone PRN. Results  The CP group ( n  = 63) had lower opioid consumption compared to the PP group ( n  = 39) when examining all aspects of opioid consumption, including daily opioid usage in morphine milligram equivalents and total opioid usage during the stay ( p  < 0.001). The CP group had shorter length of hospital stay (LOS). Conclusion  Introduction of the CP reduced opioid use and LOS was shorter.

Pre-expanded thin DIEP free flap in pediatric upper extremity reconstruction for burn sequelae: A case report

Deep burns sequelae involving the upper limb are challenging even for experienced surgeons, mainly because local reconstructive options and donor sites are often compromised. The use of free flaps for this type of reconstruction remains difficult due to the small recipient vessel diameter and tendency to vasospasm. Moreover, pediatric cases bring the challenge to another level. We present the case of a 13-year-old girl presenting major retractile sequelae of the upper left limb, including complete wrist immobilization combining wrist hyper-extension, ulnar deviation deformity, and a ulno-carpal dislocation. She was referred to our department where a two-stage reconstruction was performed using a pre-expanded free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The first surgery consisted of placing two kidney-shaped expanders in a subfascial plane in the hypogastric region. Four months later, after a bi-weekly expansion, an excision of the scar tissue, and the DIEP flap transfer were completed. At the 12-month follow-up evaluation, both aesthetic and functional results were satisfactory, with a good contour and regained mobility of the wrist.

Artificial Intelligence Language Model Performance for Rapid Intraoperative Queries in Plastic Surgery: ChatGPT and the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare has led to the development of large language models that can address various medical queries, including intraoperatively. This study investigates the potential of ChatGPT in addressing intraoperative questions during the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap procedure. Methods: A series of six intraoperative questions specific to the DIEP flap procedure, derived from real-world clinical scenarios, were proposed to ChatGPT. A panel of four experienced board-certified plastic surgeons evaluated ChatGPT's performance in providing accurate, relevant, and comprehensible responses. Results: The Likert scale demonstrated to be medically accurate, systematic in presentation, and logical when providing alternative solutions. The mean readability score of the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 28.7 (±0.8), the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 12.4 (±0.5), and the Coleman-Liau Index was 14.5 (±0.5). Suitability-wise, the DISCERN score of ChatGPT was 48 (±2.5) indicating suitable and comprehensible language for experts. Conclusions: Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT can serve as a supplementary tool for surgeons to offer valuable insights and foster intraoperative problem-solving abilities. However, it lacks consideration of individual patient factors and surgical nuances. Nevertheless, further refinement of its training data and rigorous scrutiny under experts to ensure the accuracy and up-to-date nature of the information holds the potential for it to be utilized in the surgical field.

Identifying variation in the cost of abdominally based breast reconstruction in the UK

AIMS

To understand variation in the cost of autologous breast reconstruction in the UK, including identifying key areas of cost variability, differences between and within units and the impact of enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS).

METHODS

A micro-costing study was designed based on the responses to a national survey of clinical preferences completed by the majority of plastic surgeons and anaesthetists involved in the UK. Detailed costs were estimated from macro elements such as ward and theatre running costs, down to that of surgical meshes, anaesthetic drugs and flap monitoring devices.

RESULTS

The largest variation in cost arose from postoperative location and length of stay, preoperative imaging and flap monitoring strategies. Plastic surgeon costs varied from £1282 to £3141, whereas anaesthetic costs were between £32 and £151 (not including salary). Estimated cost variation within units was up to £893 per case. Units with ERAS had significantly lower total costs than those without (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals significant cost variation in breast reconstruction in the UK based on clinician preferences. Many areas of practice driving this variation lack strong evidence of any clinical advantage. The total cost of a deep inferior epigastric perforator in the majority, if not all units, likely surpasses the national tariff for reimbursement, particularly when considering additional resource demand for immediate and bilateral breast reconstruction, as well as future symmetrisation procedures. Whilst units should look to streamline costs through ERAS, there should also be a realistic tariff that promotes excellent care.

[Cytosteatonecrosis after breast reconstruction by fat flap with or without ischemic preconditioning]

INTRODUCTION

Cytosteatonecrosis (CTN) is a frequent postoperative complication after breast autologous reconstruction using DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) flap. CTN radiological diagnostic reveals different types of lesions, as nodes or extended fat necrosis, which become in some cases infected, or pass for tumor recurrence after breast cancer treatment. CTN is caused by intraoperative ischemia of the flap, and no current method can prevent postoperative CTN development after DIEP breast reconstruction. Mechanical ischemic preconditioning, consisting in intraoperative briefs consecutive cycles of ischemia reperfusion using vascular clamp upon the graft pedicle, is used in transplantation surgery. This procedure improves the graft tolerance towards ischemic surgical lesions. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to assess PCIM effects on CTN development after DIEP surgery, comparing CTN occurrence after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap with or without intraoperative PCIM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients breats reconstructed using DIEP flap between novembre 2020 and may 2022, presenting 6 months postoperative breast echography were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was the ultrasonic existence of CTN, according to the Wagner classification. Clinical data, postoperative outcomes such as infection, hematoma or surgical revision, and length of stay in hospital were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty nine patients among which 8 PCIM were included. CTN occurrence rate after PCIM (25%) was quite lower than CTN rate without PCIM (71,4%), although the difference was not significant (P=0,088). Other postoperative complications rates were not significantly different with or without PCIM.

CONCLUSION

PCIM seems to improve CTN occurrence after DIEP breast reconstruction, improving fat flap tolerance to ischemic perioperative lesions. Those preliminary results need to be confirmed with clinical prospective study.

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) surgery is one of the most difficult breast reconstruction techniques available, both in terms of operating complexity and patient recovery. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways were recently introduced in numerous subspecialties to reduce recovery time, patient pain, and cost by providing multimodal perioperative care. Plastic surgery has yet to widely integrate ERAS with DIEP reconstruction, mostly due to insufficient data on patient outcomes with this combined approach.

METHODS

Five major medical databases were queried using predetermined search criteria according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane's RevMan (v5.4).

RESULTS

A total of 466 articles were identified. A total of 14 studies were included in the review with a combined sample of 2102 patients. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a combined sample of 1679 patients. On average, the included studies utilized 11.69 of 18 suggested protocols for ERAS with breast reconstruction. Our primary outcome, length of stay, was reduced by a mean of 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.30, -0.94], n = 1627, p < 0.001) days in the ERAS group. Postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OME) were also reduced in the ERAS group by 104.02 (95% CI [-181.43, -26.61], n = 545, p = 0.008) OME. The ERAS group saw a significant 3.54 (95% CI [-4.43, -2.65], n = 527, p < 0.001) standardized mean difference cost reduction relative to the control groups. The surgery time was reduced by 60.46 (95% CI [-125, 4.29], n = 624, p < 0.07) min, although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAS pathway in DIEP breast reconstruction is consistently associated with reduced hospital stay, opioid use, and patient cost. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of serious adverse outcomes associated with the application of the ERAS protocol.

Prolonged operative time is a risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes in the unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Currently, one published study documented operative time (OT) as a predictor for postoperative outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions. No literature has investigated this in unilateral DIEP flaps. We aimed to determine the relationship between unilateral OT, postoperative complications, unplanned reoperations (UR), and extended length-of-stay (eLOS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective unilateral DIEP reconstruction from 2018 to 2023 at a tertiary centre in London, United Kingdom, were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into four groups depending on OT quartiles to define a critical cut-off period. Data on extensive covariates, including procedural complexity, was recorded and used in univariable and multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

The final cohort contained 173 patients. After risk-adjustment, ≥421-minute operations led to a significantly higher overall complication rate (HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.26, 3.64, p = 0.005) relative to <421 min. Significantly higher odds of eLOS were observed in the ≥460-minute group (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.07, 3.99, p = 0.03) compared to <460 min. There was no significant effect on the rate of postoperative UR across any OT group.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed OT was an independent predictor for postoperative outcomes in the DIEP flap, and demonstrated this in unilateral reconstructions. A clinical maximum threshold of 7 h was derived based on this cohort to help guide future surgical practice. Efficiency can be achieved by meticulous preoperative planning and process standardisation, multiple senior surgeons working per flap, and smooth teamwork between specialities and intraoperative staff.

Outcomes of DIEP flap reconstruction after pelvic cancer surgery: A retrospective multicenter case series

BACKGROUND

Flap reconstruction is often required after pelvic tumor resection to reduce wound complications. The use of perforator flaps has been shown to reduce donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator (pDIEP) flap reconstruction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent immediate pDIEP flap reconstruction for a pelvic or perineal defect after tumor resection between November 2012 and June 2022. The primary outcome was abdominal donor site morbidity, and the secondary outcome was perineal morbidity.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (median age, 57.5 years) who underwent pelvic exenteration (n = 31), extralevator abdominoperineal excision (n = 2), or extended vaginal hysterectomy (n = 1) were included. The most common indications were recurrent cervical (n = 19) and anal (n = 4) squamous cell carcinoma. Twenty-nine patients (85%) had a history of radiotherapy. Only one patient (3%) had major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) donor site complications (surgical site infection due to tumor recurrence). Eleven patients (32%) had at least one major recipient site complication (surgical site infection [n = 1], total [n = 2] or partial [n = 1] flap loss, perineal dehiscence [n = 2], hematoma [n = 1], fistula [n = 5]). No incisional or perineal hernias were observed during follow-up. Ninety-day survival was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Pedicled DIEP flap reconstructions performed by experienced surgical teams had good outcomes for perineal or vaginal reconstruction, with low abdominal morbidity, in patients with advanced pelvic malignancies who had undergone median laparotomy. The risks and benefits of this procedure should be carefully evaluated preoperatively using clinical and imaging data.

Efficacy of breast reconstruction in elderly women (>60 years) using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

The indications for microsurgical breast reconstruction remain debated, particularly concerning the safety of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in elderly women. Free tissue transfer still carries a risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. We conducted this comparative study to clarify this issue.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all unilateral DIEP breast reconstructions performed at a single institution. Patients were divided into two groups based on age: an elderly (60 years or older) and a non-elderly cohort (younger than 60 years). Demographic and comorbidity data were secondary predictor variables. The primary outcomes were complete flap loss, partial flap loss, and the need for flap re-exploration. The secondary outcomes included surgical site occurrences, such as wound healing-related complications, seroma, and others.

RESULTS

We included 214 flaps, 177 in the non-elderly and 37 in the elderly cohort. Elderly women had slightly higher comorbidity rates than those of non-elderly women, although these differences were not statistically significant. BMI was significantly lower in elderly women than in non-elderly women. The incidence of total or partial flap loss did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (2.7% vs 1.1%, p = 0.459% and 0.0% vs 5.1%, p = 0.161), nor did the flap re-exploration (8.1% vs 10.1%, p = 0.937). Similarly, postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (45.9% vs 61.8%, p = 0.074). On logistic regression, being elderly was not a risk factor for complete flap loss, nor for any complications. The overall success rate for the non-elderly cohort was 98.7%, whereas that for the elderly cohort was 97.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical breast reconstruction using DIEP is safe in elderly patients, as it achieves outcomes and complications rates comparable to those observed in a younger population. Patients should not be denied DIEP flaps because of their age alone.

Covering of wound infection in hip arthroplasty with local cutaneous flaps

Total hip arthroplasty is a very common procedure to treat osteoarthritis. One of the complication is the infection which occurs in about 1% of the cases. The manifestation of infection can be poor wound healing with dehiscence and exposition of bone or prosthetic components. Hip arthroplasty infections are difficult to treat. It required an associated multidisciplinary approach with infectiology, orthopedic and plastic surgeries. The study included five patients with hip wound dehiscence after total hip arthroplasty. Coverage after orthopedic surgery was provided by local cutaneous flap. These cutaneous flaps were either a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) or a transposition flap. The orthopedic and the plastic treatment were done at the same time. Two deep inferior epigastric flaps were performed for patients with a deep defect with bone or prosthesis exposure. Four transposition flaps were done in three patients with wound dehiscence but without direct contact with the prosthesis. Three transposition flaps were done from the abdominal wall and one from the posterior thigh. The mean follow up was 18 months, ranging from 10 to 24months. After healing, there was no recurrence of the infection. In all cases, the coverage was obtained. The prosthesis was salvage and the gait was possible. Cutaneous flaps are easy and safe to cover the hip. They are reliable flaps even in patients with multiple co-morbidities. They do not cause sequelae on the recipient site. This study is the first about cutaneous flap for covering hip defects in hip arthroplasty infections.

Analysis of online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flap autologous breast reconstruction

Online resources have become a mainstay for health information, and it is vital that such resources maintain accessible literacy levels to empower informed decision making. Previous studies have shown that the online resources regarding post-mastectomy breast reconstruction are of low readability; however, none have evaluated specific online resources regarding the most common procedures within autologous breast reconstruction, limiting analysis to the results of generic searches. This study sought to discover the readability of online, patient-directed resources regarding the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) and Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle (TRAM) flaps, the most utilized autologous flaps in breast reconstruction, using health literacy analysis. We hypothesized that the online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flaps would yield literacy scores above the 6th-grade reading level, as recommended by the American Medical Association, despite previous literature and readability recommendations. Google searches for "DIEP breast reconstruction" and "TRAM breast reconstruction" were conducted. All patient-directed, non-sponsored websites found within the first three pages of the search underwent analysis using a variety of readability formulae. Both DIEP and TRAM resources were well above the 6th-grade reading level according to every metric used, and there was no significant difference in the reading level between the two procedures. Based on these results, significant work was needed to simplify the online resources to be more understandable for patients; these authors propose one method for such. In addition, the low readability of online resources suggests added emphasis on the need for surgeons to ensure that patients understand the medical information discussed during the presurgical consultations.

Use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap

Background

Autologous breast reconstruction is highly regarded in reconstructive surgery after mastectomy. DIEP flap reconstruction represents the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. The major advantages of DIEP flap reconstruction are its adequate volume, large vascular caliber and pedicle length. Despite reliable anatomy, there are procedures where the plastic surgeon's creativity is required, not only to shape the new breast, but also to overcome microsurgical challenges. An important tool in these cases is the superficial epigastric vein (SIEV).

Methods

150 DIEP flap procedures performed between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for SIEV use. Intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Rate of anastomosis revision, total and partial flap loss, fat necrosis and donor site complications were evaluated.

Results

In a total of 150 breast reconstructions with a DIEP flap performed in our clinic, the SIEV was used in 5 cases. The indication for using the SIEV was to improve the venous drainage of the flap or as a graft to reconstruct the main artery perforator. Among the 5 cases, no flap loss occurred.

Conclusions

Use of the SIEV is an excellent method to expand the microsurgical options in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap surgery. It provides a safe and reliable procedure to improve venous outflow in cases of inadequate outflow from the deep venous system. The SIEV could also provide a very good option for fast and reliable application as an interposition device in case of arterial complications.

Mastopexy Strategies for Ptotic Breasts in Patients Choosing Autologous Reconstruction Following Prophylactic Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Autologous breast reconstruction is a reliable solution for many patients after mastectomy. While this technique represents a standardized approach in many patients, patients with ptotic breasts may require a combination of procedures to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result.

METHODS

We reviewed the mastectomy and free-flap breast reconstruction procedures performed at our institution from 2018 to 2022 in patients with ptotic breasts. The technique used to address the ptosis was put in focus as we present the four strategies used by our reconstructive surgeons. We performed two different one-stage and two different two-stage procedures. The difference between the two-stage procedures was the way the nipple areola complex was treated (inferior dermal pedicle or free skin graft). The difference between the one-stage procedures was the time of execution of the mastopexy/breast reduction (before or after the mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction).

RESULTS

The one-stage procedure was performed with a free NAC in three patients and with a pedicled NAC in five patients. The two-stage procedure was performed in seven patients, with six of them undergoing mastopexy before and one patient undergoing mastopexy after the bilateral mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. No flap loss or total loss of the nipple areola complex occurred. Partial NAC loss was observed in five breasts in the single-stage group without any occurrence in the double-stage group.

CONCLUSIONS

While both one- and two-stage procedures were performed in a safe fashion with satisfactory results at our institution, larger trials are required to determine which procedure may yield the best possible outcomes. These outcomes should also include oncological safety and patient-reported outcomes.

Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: The Learning Curve at a Breast Reconstruction Center and a Single-Surgeon Study

Although microsurgical breast reconstruction represents a very interesting and rewarding field of plastic surgery, appropriate microsurgical training is not possible in every plastic surgery department. In this retrospective study, we present the learning curve of our plastic surgery department as a whole and of a single microsurgeon assessing breast reconstruction procedures with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap between July 2018 and June 2021. The present study included 115 patients and 161 flaps. Cases were stratified into single DIEP/double DIEP groups and into early and late groups based on the flap order. Surgery times and postoperative complications were analyzed. Regarding the institution, the length of hospital stay was lower in the late group than in the early group (single 7.1 ± 1.8 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.019; double 8.5 ± 3.8 vs. 6.6 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.043). Apart from that, no statistically significant differences were found between the start and end of our study. In terms of the single surgeon, there was a significant improvement in the total surgery time (single 296.0 ± 78.7 vs. 227.5 ± 54.7 min, p = 0.018; double 448.0 ± 85.6 vs. 341.2 ± 43.1 min, p = 0.008), flap ischemia time (53.6 ± 15.1 vs. 40.9 ± 9.5 min, p = 0.007) and length of stay among the compared groups. There was no significant difference in flap loss rate or other complications between the early and late groups. Further performance of surgeries seemed to improve the surgeon's skills as well as the overall experience of the medical institution.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap should be considered for autologous breast reconstruction when a patient's abdomen is unavailable as a donor site. The LAP flap can be harvested with dimensions and volume of distribution that facilitate the restoration of a naturally shaped breast with a sloping upper pole and maximal projection in the lower one-third. Harvest of LAP flaps lifts the buttocks and narrows the waist and, consequently, aesthetic improvement in body contour is generally achieved with these procedures. Although technically challenging, the LAP flap is a valuable tool in the practice of autologous breast reconstruction.

Modern Approaches to Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction

Modern approaches to abdominal-based breast reconstruction have evolved since the introduction of the transverse musculocutaneous flap by Dr Carl Hartrampf in the 1980s. The natural evolution of this flap is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, as well as the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. As breast reconstruction has advanced, so too has the utility and nuances of abdominal-based flaps, including the deep circumflex iliac artery flap, extended flaps, stacked flaps; neurotization; and perforator exchange techniques. Even the delay phenomenon has been successfully applied to DIEP and SIEA flaps to augment flap perfusion.

Reducing donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction with closed incisional negative pressure therapy: A cost-benefit analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction but create large abdominal incisions that risk donor-site morbidity during harvest. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) is emerging as an effective alternative to standard postoperative dressings, but there is a paucity of data in DIEP flap donor sites.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study investigating the use of ciNPT in DIEP flap donor sites at a single institution between March 2017 and September 2021. Patients who underwent microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps were included. Patients were divided into those with donor incision sites managed with ciNPT (n = 24) and those with conventional postoperative wound dressings (n = 20). We compared patient demographics, wound drainage volumes and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. A cost-benefit analysis was employed to compare the overall costs associated with each complication and differences in length of stay between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity burden or smoking status between the two groups. Both groups had similar lengths of stay and wound drainage volumes with no readmissions or reoperations in either group. There was a statistically significant reduction in donor-site complications (p = 0.018), surgical site infections (p = 0.014) and seroma formation (p = 0.016) in those with ciNPT. Upon cost-benefit analysis, the ciNPT group had a mean reduction in cost-per-patient associated with postoperative complications of £420.77 (p = 0.031) and £446.47 (p = 0.049) when also accounting for postoperative length of stay CONCLUSION: ciNPT appears to be an effective alternative incision management system with the potential to improve complication rates and postoperative morbidity in DIEP flap donor sites. Our analysis demonstrates improved cost-benefit outweighing the increase in costs associated with ciNPT. We recommend a multicentre prospective trial with formal cost-utility analysis to strengthen these findings.

Pre-operative Radiotherapy And Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flAp study (PRADA): Aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction at one year

INTRODUCTION

The optimal combination of radiotherapy and breast reconstruction has not yet been defined. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has deleterious effects on breast reconstruction, leading to caution amongst surgeons. Pre-operative radiotherapy (PRT) is a growing area of interest, is demonstrated to be safe, and spares autologous flaps from radiotherapy. This study evaluates the aesthetic outcome of PRT and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction within the Pre-operative Radiotherapy And Deep Inferior Epigastric artery Perforator (DIEP) flAp (PRADA) cohort.

METHODS

PRADA was an observational cohort study designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of PRT for women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and DIEP reconstruction. Panel evaluation of 3D surface images (3D-SIs) and patient-reported outcome measures (BREAST-Q) for a subset of women in the study were compared with those of a DIEP-PMRT cohort who had undergone DIEP reconstruction and PMRT.

RESULTS

Seventeen out of 33 women from the PRADA study participated in this planned substudy. Twenty-eight women formed the DIEP-PMRT cohort (median follow-up 23 months). The median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) 'satisfaction with breasts' score at 12 months for the PRADA cohort was significantly better than the DIEP-PMRT cohort (77 [72-87] versus 64 [54-71], respectively), p=0.01). Median [IQR] panel evaluation (5-point scale) was also significantly better for the PRADA cohort than for the DIEP-PMRT cohort (4.3 [3.9-4.6] versus 3.6 [2.8-4] p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Aesthetic outcome for the PRADA cohort was reported to be 'good' or 'excellent' in 93% of cases using a bespoke panel assessment with robust methodology. Patient satisfaction at one year is encouraging and superior to DIEP-PMRT at 23 months. Switching surgery-radiotherapy sequencing leads to similar breast aesthetic outcomes and warrants further large-scale, multi-centre evaluation in a randomised trial.

Use of free flaps in aesthetic breast surgery: a single centre experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast augmentation is one of the most performed procedures in aesthetic surgery, whereas autologous tissue application is confined to fat grafting as adjuvant procedure. The use of free flaps in cosmetic mammoplasties is not popular, but the number of reports in the literature is increasing. We believe that autologous tissue transfer for cosmetic purposes could be a valuable alternative for volume enhancement in selected conditions, especially following weight loss. In this paper, we provide a systematic literature review of the current literature of using autologous free flaps for breast augmentation in non-cancer patients, and we also report our experience on this topic to identify possible indications and criteria for the patients' selection.

METHODS

PRISMA's guidelines have been followed for the literature review. In order to demonstrate the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction with breast volume enhancement with autologous tissue, a retrospective single-centre study was conducted on women who underwent breast volume enhancement with autologous tissue. Patient's satisfaction was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) creating an ad-hoc outcome scale, and the data were summarised with a descriptive statistic.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Weight loss was the main indication for surgery. The average length of procedure was 5.1 h, and the hospitalization was 2.3 days. After 12 month, the patient outcome was excellent in 2 cases, good in 9 cases and moderate in 1 case.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further research is needed, the literature review and our case series show that the use of free flaps for breast volume enhancement is safe and gives a satisfactory outcome.

[Is the internet a reliable source of information for patients eligible for breast reconstruction by DIEP flap?]

INTRODUCTION

Informing breast reconstruction patients is a major factor in shared medical decision-making. In the light of the development of multimedia, patients face a paradoxical duality: the possibility of consulting various sources while having impression of a lacking the needed information. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of the available information around MR by DIEP on Youtube.

METHODS

For this descriptive study, we reviewed 531 videos resulted from the terms "DIEP breast reconstruction". 39 videos were analyzed in detail. The evaluation criteria established from the SOFCPRE sheet were listed in 43 items divided into 4 themes. A score representing the percentage of correct information is then calculated.

RESULTS

The average length of the videos is 40'05″±46'45″. The average total score is 42.52%. Concerning the subgroups, the themes generalities and physiopathology have the highest result (66.10% of the correct items). This is followed by technique and perioperative preparation (51.65%), postoperative (27.35%) and finally complications (22.76%). Only 2 videos have an excellent total score (>80%).

CONCLUSION

The information on breast reconstruction by DIEP flap on Youtube seems insufficient and lacks quality. The surgeon should strive to provide the highest quality of information and refer patients to reliable sources.

[Satisfaction and quality of life after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction]

Satisfaction and quality of life of patients who have undergone DIEP-flap breast reconstruction have been assessed by many authors in many countries using standardized tools. However, some simple and practical information is often not found in these studies. The aim of our work was to carry out a practical satisfaction survey of patients reconstructed by DIEP flap in our center. Our cohort was made up of 207 patients who underwent DIEP-flap breast reconstruction in Marseille between January 2014 and December 2020. A letter containing our original satisfaction survey was sent to all the patients in our sample. We received 104 responses, which were statistically analyzed using the flat sorting method. Nine-two percent of patients were globally satisfied with the result of their breast reconstruction. A large majority of patients are in favor of the idea of performing their reconstruction again using a DIEP flap. Fifty-five percent of participants were "not bothered at all" by their abdomen after their surgery. The DIEP flap is a versatile technique that allows surgeons to offer it in multiple breast reconstruction situations and to obtain a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Long-term survey of sexual well-being after breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q in the Japanese population

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify response patterns related to sexual well-being following breast operations in the Japanese population.

METHODS

Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed at 1 year and 5 years after breast operations, including breast reconstruction, for Japanese women at a single center, with a focus on "Sexual well-being" in BREAST-Q. Response analysis and multiple regression analysis were performed. The scores at years 1 and 5 were also compared across three types of operation: mastectomy only, TE/Imp, and DIEP.

RESULTS

The response rate for Sexual well-being on BREAST-Q in the prospective cohort of patients with breast cancer dropped from 60.0% in postoperative year 1-34.3% in year 5. The mean score for Sexual well-being increased from 32 (year 1) to 38 (year 5). There were significant differences between respondents and non-respondents in age at year 1 (P = 0.007) and for mastectomy only (P = 0.01) and TE/Imp (P = 0.03) at year 5. In regression analysis, only DIEP was positively associated with Sexual well-being at year 1 (p < 0.001) and there were no significant factors at year 5. Among the operative procedures, scores after DIEP were significantly better than those after mastectomy only at year 1 (p < 0.001), but there was no difference at year 5. There were no significant changes from year 1 to year 5 for each operation.

CONCLUSIONS

A low response rate for Sexual well-being on BREAST-Q was found in Japanese women at 5 years postoperatively. This suggests the need for development of a modified evaluative scale that avoids nonresponse bias and considers ethnic differences.

Patient Reported Outcome and Quality of Life After Delayed Breast Reconstruction - An RCT Comparing Different Reconstructive Methods in Radiated and Non-radiated Patients

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the core outcomes for breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the method of delayed breast reconstruction affects long-term HRQoL.

METHODS

Participants were divided into 2 arms depending on previous radiotherapy, and subsequently randomized between 2 methods of breast reconstruction: a latissimus dorsi flap or a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in the radiated arm and a thoracodorsal flap and implant or an expander in the non-radiated arm. Validated HRQoL instruments were used: BREAST-Q to evaluate breast specific HRQoL and satisfaction, RAND-36 and EQ-5D to evaluate generic HRQoL, and BDI-21 to measure symptoms of depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

During the recruitment period (2009-2015), 233 patients were randomized. After opt-outs and exclusions, the remaining 107 participants comprise the study sample. Postoperative HrQoL was measured on average 7to 8years post-operatively. Response rates varied between 60 and 82 per cent. The BREAST-Q scores were higher after the reconstruction than before for the great majority of domains in both arms; albeit statistically significant only between the 2 methods for physical well-being chest in the radiated arm. Most participants in both arms had minimal or mild depression both before and after the operation.

CONCLUSION

No distinct differences in long-term HrQoL could be seen for different methods There was a clear improvement in HrQoL compared to pre-reconstruction in all groups, but the effect of specific reconstructive methods on scores could not be reliably demonstrated.

Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Maximizing Success

Breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly recognized as a fundamental component in comprehensive breast cancer treatment. The primary goal for any reconstruction is to safely restore a natural appearing breast. When it comes to achieving the elements of size, shape, symmetry, and softness, the use of autologous tissue has many advantages. The approach to autologous breast reconstruction has changed substantially over the years as microsurgical free tissue transplants become more routine and accessible. While a variety of flap donor sites exist, careful flap selection based on surgical history and the availability of donor tissue is critical in achieving reliable results. This article reviews the clinical considerations in patient evaluation, donor site selection, and surgical approach taken at the Buncke Clinic.

Implementing the Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator Flap in daily practice: A series of 10 cases

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the workhorse in microvascular breast reconstruction. Rectus muscle sacrifice or denervation and inappropriate rectus sheath closure are the main causes of abdominal wall morbidity. Robotic vessel dissection may limit fascial incision length below the arcuate line and rectus denervation. This study describes and focuses on the implementation and feasibility of this technique in daily surgical practice. A retrospective data collection of all robotic DIEP flap reconstructions between August 2020 and October 2021 was conducted at our university hospital. Primary outcome variables were flap success and intraoperative complications. Secondary variables included timing of the different robot-assisted stages, total operating time, and postoperative complications within 6 weeks. In total, 10 robotic DIEPs were performed using a multiport robotic system through the transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Nine short intramuscular (SIM) and 1 subfascial (SF) perforators were selected based on the preoperative imaging. There were no perioperative intra-abdominal complications or flap losses. Robotic installation ranges from 16 to 40 min. Mean robot-assisted operating time was 86 min, and mean operative time was 479 min. We present the largest case series of robotic DIEP flap reconstructions for delayed and immediate autologous breast reconstruction through a transabdominal preperitoneal approach. This technique is safe, reproducible, and feasible in a daily hospital setting. We have observed a steep learning curve associated with robotic vessel dissection. Future research may optimize surgical technique, assess possible benefit on abdominal wall morbidity, and evaluate cost-effectiveness.

Breast reconstruction with autologous abdomen-based free flap with prior abdominal liposuction - a case-based review

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, liposuction has become the most commonly used surgical procedure used to refine male and female body contours. In the last four decades, the incidence of breast cancer has increased. Of these patients, there are more women requiring breast reconstruction who have undergone liposuction in the past. There is little in the literature that discusses harvesting perforator flaps from previously liposuctioned donor sites. The authors report on their experience and review the current literature on the autologous abdominal-based free flap for breast reconstruction after previous liposuction of the abdominal wall.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched (Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane) from inception to March 2021. Also, we searched our patients records and included our experience.

RESULTS

We included three cases who had previous liposuction prior to their breast reconstruction procedure. We report no flap loss in our cases. Moreover, the database search showed 30 patients (83.33%) underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) reconstruction. The age ranged from 32 to 73 years (mean of 51.7 years). The mean length of reconstruction after liposuction is 8.9 years, ranging from 1.5 years to 23 years reported in 23 patients. Seven patients (19.4%) had partial loss of the flap. Twenty patients (55.55%) had CT angiography pre-operatively for the assessment of the perforators.

CONCLUSION

A careful combination of preoperative scanning, handheld Doppler and clinical examination reduce the chance of an unsuccessful outcome.

[A pedicled deep inferior epigastric flap to cover a hip arthroplasty infection]

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a reliable flap mostly used in skin resurfacing after signifiant resection for sarcoma or correction contour deformities. This case is about a pedicled DIEP flap covering the trochanteric region after a total hip arthroplasty infection. A 62years old woman with a BMI at 42kg/m² presents an infected total hip arthroplasty with a cutaneous defect. The hip prosthesis is changed and covered with a pedicled DIEP flap. This original case reports the used of pedicled DIEP flap in hip coverage. This local fasciocutaneous flap covered the hip osteoarticular infection. The limb is salved and the patient can walked again. The success of this surgery is the collaboration between infectious disease specialist, orthopedic surgeon and plastic surgeon.

Is Pregnancy Following a TRAM or DIEP Flap Safe? A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous data were not conclusive on the safety of gestation in patients whose abdominal flaps were earlier harvested. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the abdominal wall complications and birth mode of pregnancy in post-TRAM or post-DIEP harvested individuals.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google scholar database. Heterogeneity was statistically analyzed, and random effect models were applied. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot.

RESULTS

We included 25 papers that captured 56 patients giving birth to 69 healthy babies after elevation of abdominally based flaps, with a pooled abdominal complication rate of 0.00-0.09. The complication incidence in TRAM group was 0.01 (95% CI = [0.00-0.14%]) while 0.00 in the DIEP group (95% CI = [0.00-0.26%]). Discrepancies in incidence following unilaterally or bilaterally based TRAM flaps, following free or pedicled TRAM flaps, following primary sutured or mesh strengthened fascia, following MS free TRAM or conventional free TRAM could not be calculated as statistically significant. TRAM group and DIEP group patients had identical birth modes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis did not detect evidence that abdominal walls with the prior harvest of abdominal flaps could affect the process of pregnancy or contraindicate vaginal delivery. No abdominal hernia or bulge occurred with post-DIEP pregnancies. However, such conclusions need to be substantiated by larger sample studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites

Background: Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may reduce the rate of wound complications and promote healing of the incisional site. We report our experience with this dressing in breast reconstruction patients with abdominal free flap donor sites. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps (DIEP, MS-TRAM) at a single institution (Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria) between 2016 and 2021. Results: 126 female patients (mean age: 50 ± 10 years) were analysed, with 41 and 85 patients in the ciNPT (Prevena) and non-ciNPT (Comfeel) groups, respectively. There were reduced wound complications in almost all outcomes measured in the ciNPT group compared with the non-ciNPT group; however, none reached statistical significance. The ciNPT group demonstrated a lower prevalence of surgical site infections (9.8% vs. 11.8%), wound dehiscence (4.9% vs. 12.9%), wound necrosis (0% vs. 2.4%), and major complication requiring readmission (2.4% vs. 7.1%). Conclusion: The use of ciNPT for abdominal donor sites in breast reconstruction patients with risk factors for poor wound healing may reduce wound complications compared with standard adhesive dressings; however, large scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these observations. Investigation of the impact of ciNPT patients in comparison with conventional dressings, in cohorts with equivocal risk profiles, remains a focus for future research.

Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Feasibility and aesthetic results - Case series

BACKGROUND

The application of robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) has allowed mastectomy to be performed via a small incision. Breast reconstruction with free autologous tissue results in the most natural and long-lasting results, however, its application in R-NSM can be difficult via the small incision and haven't been explored in depth. The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility and aesthetic outcome of free perforator flap breast reconstruction via small lateral chest wall incision after R-NSM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who received R-NSM and free perforator flap reconstruction as the study group and patients who received conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (C-NSM) and free perforator flap reconstruction as the control group from January 2018 to August 2020 by single reconstructive surgeon. Patient demographic data, complications from both mastectomy and reconstruction, status of resection margin and oncological outcome were reviewed. Aesthetic outcome was evaluated by 9 plastic surgeons.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included of which 22 (34.9%) received R-NSM and 41 (65.1%) received C-NSM. Their demographic data, reconstruction flaps, overall complication rate and follow up time were similar. Unlike C-NSM, majority of the R-NSM groups used the thoracodorsal or lateral thoracic vessels as the recipient vessels. Patients in the R-NSM group has smaller scar and better aesthetic outcome in the symmetry of breast inframammary fold, scar location and visibility, and overall aesthetic outcome.

CONCLUSION

Although with difficulty in microvascular anastomosis and flap inset and shaping, R-NSM with perforator flap reconstruction presented with equal surgical and oncological safety with C-NSM and even better aesthetic results.

The third dimension in perforator mapping-Comparison of Cinematic Rendering and maximum intensity projection in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Cinematic Rendering (CR) is a recently introduced post-processing three-dimensional (3D) visualization imaging tool. The aim of this study was to assess its clinical value in the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps, and to compare it with maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. The study presents the first application of CR for perforator mapping prior to autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Two senior surgeons independently analyzed CR and MIP images based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets of 20 patients in terms of vascular pedicle characteristics, the possibility to harvest a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap, and the side of the flap harvest. We calculated inter- and intra-observer agreement in order to examine the accordance of both image techniques.

RESULTS

We observed a good inter- and intra-observer agreement concerning the type of flap and the side of the flap harvest. However, the agreement on the pedicle characteristics varies depending on the considered variable. Both investigators identified a significantly higher number of perforators with MIP compared with CR (observer 1, p<0.0001 and observer 2, p<0.0385).

CONCLUSION

The current study serves as an explorative study, showing first experiences with CR in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction. In addition to MIP images, CR might improve the surgeon's understanding of the individual's anatomy. Future studies are required to compare CR with other 3D visualization tools and its possible effects on operative parameters.

Thermal, Hyperspectral, and Laser Doppler Imaging: Non-Invasive Tools for Detection of The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforators-A Prospective Comparison Study

Perforator flaps have become one of the leading procedures in microsurgical tissue transfer. Individual defects require a tailored approach to guarantee the most effective treatment. A thorough understanding of the individual vascular anatomy and the location of prominent perforators is of utmost importance and usually requires invasive angiography or at least acoustic Doppler exploration. In this study, we aimed at evaluating different non-invasive imaging modalities as possible alternatives for perforator location detection. After a cooling phase, we performed thermal, hyperspectral and Laser Doppler imaging and visually evaluated a possible detection of the perforator for a period of five minutes with an image taken every minute. We identified the most prominent perforator of the deep inferior epigastric artery by handheld acoustic Doppler in 18 patients. The detected perforator locations were then correlated. Eighteen participants were assessed with six images each per imaging method. We could show a positive match for 94.44%, 38.89%, and 0% of patients and 92.59%, 25.93%, and 0% of images for the methods respectively compared to the handheld acoustic Doppler. Sex, age, abdominal girth, and BMI showed no correlation with a possible visual detection of the perforator in the images. Therefore, thermal imaging can yield valuable supporting data in the individualized procedure planning. Future larger cohort studies are required to better assess the full potential of modern handheld thermal imaging devices.

Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes After DIEP Breast Reconstruction at a Low-Volume Community Hospital Without Microvascular Fellowship Training

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical breast reconstruction is typically performed at large, academic centers by fellowship-trained surgeons. This study examines surgical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at a community hospital by surgeons without fellowship training.

METHODS

A prospective clinical database and BREAST-Q results were obtained from 33 patients after 45 DIEP flaps performed between 2016 and 2020. PROs and complications were compared to normative data and multi-institutional series. Regression analysis of patient and surgical factors with BREAST-Q scores was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients completed BREAST-Q (response rate = 94%). Overall flap survival was 97.8%. Complications were not statistically different from larger published series (P > 0.05). Patients reported excellent outcomes after breast reconstruction: satisfaction with breasts (80.6 ± 4.3), satisfaction with outcome (88.3 ±17.7), psychosocial well-being (80.74 ± 17.4), sexual well-being (68.2 ± 24.1), physical well-being - chest (73.8 ± 16.1), and physical well-being - abdomen (73.3 ± 17.4). PROs were not statistically different from published multicenter data with the exception of superior scores in sexual well-being (P < 0.05) and breast satisfaction (P < 0.0001). Satisfaction with outcome varied by patient age and was 20.7 points higher for patients over 55 compared to patients 46 to 55 years of age (P < 0.05). Satisfaction with breasts was 29 points lower after total flap loss (P < 0.005). Psychosocial well-being scores were 26.98 points lower after a takeback (P < 0.05). Sexual well-being and physical well-being - chest scores were negatively related to increasing body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed with high quality and excellent PROs at a community hospital by surgeons without microvascular fellowship training.

Development of A Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Breast Reconstruction in Poland Syndrome Patients Considering Severity, Sex, and BMI

Introduction: Poland syndrome is a rare, challenging combination of chest wall and breast deformities for reconstructive surgeons and selecting the treatment can prove difficult. This study aims to help surgeons in choosing the best viable option for treatment by sharing our institutional experience and proposing a guiding algorithm. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients with Poland syndrome undergoing treatment for breast and chest wall deformities at a single institution between December 2011 and May 2020 was performed. Medical charts were reviewed to allow for a description of patient demographics, treatment modalities and complications. A treatment algorithm to aid in selecting the adequate reconstructive option based on our institutional experience was formulated. Results: A total of 22 patients (six male, 16 female) were identified who received treatment for Poland Syndrome related deformities. Nine received microsurgical free flap reconstruction (three Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flaps, six Transverse Myocutaneous Gracilis flaps), two received reconstruction with a local flap (two Latissimus dorsi flaps), nine received implant based reconstruction, and two were treated with autologous free fat transfer only (17 in combination with other surgical methods). Conclusion: Free flap reconstruction with the TMG flap is a valid option for patients with low Body Mass Index (BMI), while Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flaps should be considered for patients with a higher BMI. Autologous free fat transfer proves to be a safe and efficient treatment option in mild cases of Poland syndrome for male and female patients, in combination with or without implant based reconstructive surgery. Multicentre studies should be conducted to achieve higher case numbers of this rare disease and support clinical decisions with more data.

Autologous reconstructions are associated with greater overall medium-term care costs than implant-based reconstructions in the Finnish healthcare system: A retrospective interim case-control cohort study

PURPOSE

Previous studies have mainly reported the short-term costs of different reconstruction techniques. Revision operations may increase costs in longer follow-up. Authors report medium-term data on different reconstruction methods. We hypothesised that the reconstruction method would affect not only the duration of reconstruction process but also total costs.

METHODS

The reconstruction database was reviewed from 2008 to 2019. Women with autologous (deep inferior epigastric perforator, transverse musculocutaneous gracilis and latissimus dorsi [LD] without implant) and implant-based (implant and LD with implant) reconstructions were included. Variables evaluated included age, body mass index, smoking, comorbidities, radiotherapy, complications and readmissions. Risk factors for multiple revision surgeries were analysed. Time to definitive reconstruction and related costs were also calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 591 patients with autologous reconstructions and 202 with implant-based reconstructions were included. The median follow-up time was 73 months. Definitive reconstruction was obtained in 443 days in implant-based reconstructions and in 403 days in autologous reconstructions (P = 0.050). Independent risk factors for multiple surgeries were younger age (P < 0.001) and comorbidity (P = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of overall surgical procedures (P = 0.098), but implant-based reconstructions were more commonly associated with two or more planned operations (P = 0.008). Autologous reconstructions were associated with greater total cost ($22 052 vs. $18 329, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This review of reconstructions over a 12-year study period revealed that autologous reconstructions are associated with greater overall costs, but there is no statistically significant difference in reconstruction time or rate of surgical procedures. However, a full cost assessment between reconstructive techniques requires a much longer follow-up period.

Leaving the perfusion zones? Individualized flap design in 100 free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps for autologous breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiography

BACKGROUND

There is still no consensus regarding the ideal zoning in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction using free DIEP or ms-TRAM flaps. In particular, the perfusion pattern of the flap according to the number of perforators used and their location remains controversial. In this study, the perfusion of free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps is assessed intraoperatively and analyzed with regard to different perfusion patterns.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 free flaps for breast reconstruction was performed. Following complete flap harvest, we used indocyanine green angiography for perfusion analysis. By applying two different contour levels, DIEP flaps with lateral or medial perforators and ms-TRAM flaps were assessed for their respective perfusion patterns.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in the size of the perfusion area between the different flap types when applying the contour level of 20% (p >0.05). For the contour level of 30%, however, statistically significant differences were found between DIEP flaps with medially or laterally located perforators (p = 0.038). Laterally or medially located perforators in DIEP flaps showed no significant differences in their ability to cross the midline (contour level 20%, p = 0.068; contour level 30%, p = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

Considering the variability of the perfusion of the abdominal wall and the high sensitivity of indocyanine green angiography for their detection, the abdominal zonings play a minor role. By using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography, a precise and patient-specific free flap surgery for autologous breast reconstruction is possible independent of perforator location.

Is there any difference in perioperative characteristics or postoperative complications between overweight, normal-weight and obese patients in delayed DIEP reconstructions?

Increased number of overweight and obese women are seeking breast reconstruction. Studies have demonstrated that obese experience increased rates of complications, but less data is available considering overweight patients. We analyzed the impact of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative characteristics and complications in unilateral delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) reconstructions. The records of patients with DIEP reconstruction performed between 2014 and 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into obese (BMI ≥30), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9), and normal-weight groups (BMI <25). Patient characteristics (age, comorbidity, radiation, abdominal surgery, ASA category, and smoking), perioperative characteristics (length of operation, blood loss, vasoactive drugs, fluid administration, and urine output), and postoperative complications were recorded. The study included 308 patients. Of these, 104 (34%) were normal-weighted, 142 (46%) overweight and 62 (20%) obese. Among patients with BMI ≥ 25, blood loss increased (p = 0.002) and the length of operation tended to be longer (p = 0.072). No between-groups difference existed in fluid administration (p = 0.319), urine output (p = 0.425), or use of vasoactive drugs (p = 0.815). There was no statistically significant difference in overall complications (p = 0.122) between BMI groups. Blood loss >150ml was associated with both minor and major complications (p = 0.022). Greater BMI moderated with the radiation therapy for higher risk of minor complications (OR 42.0, 95%CI 3.54-49.7, p = 0.003). We conclude that greater BMI alone is not associated with a higher overall complication rate, but both overweight and obesity may be moderators for other risk factors.

The Use of Semi-Absorbable Mesh and its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of semi-absorbable mesh on donor-site morbidity and patient-reported outcomes in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had DIEP flap breast reconstruction in our department from July 2007 to March 2019. Patients were invited to a comparative follow-up visit and grouped according to donor-site closure: primary fascial closure (the no-mesh group) and fascial reinforcement with semi-absorbable mesh in a subfascial position (the mesh group). The primary outcome of interest was donor-site morbidity, including bulging, hernia formation and rectus abdominis muscle strength. We also surveyed, surgical site complications and patient-reported outcomes using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0 and BREAST-Q^© version 2.0.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients had received DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Eighty-five patients (44.5%) with 108 DIEP flaps (53 patients in the mesh group and 32 patients in the no-mesh group) were included in the study. The mean BMI of the patients was significantly higher in the mesh group (mesh group, 26.9 vs. no-mesh group, 25.0, with p = 0.03). The incidence of hernia was significantly reduced in the mesh group (mesh group, 2.8% vs. no-mesh group, 13.5%, with p = 0.03). The incidence of bulging and the extent of rectus abdominis muscle strength were similar for both groups. Operative surgical site complications were reduced in the mesh group (mesh group, 7.5% vs. no-mesh group, 18.8%). There was no difference in patients' physical well-being and satisfaction with the donor site between groups. Patient-reported scar outcome was significantly better in the no-mesh group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our novel method of donor-site closure with semi-absorbable mesh in a subfascial position for reinforcement of the anterior rectus fascia on the DIEP donor site is safe. It has no negative impact on surgical site complications and patient-reported outcomes, while reducing the incidence of hernias on the donor-site in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Laparoscopy-assisted immediate vaginal reconstruction with a vertical pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for primary melanoma of the vagina

The vagina is a rare site for primary melanoma. Here, we report on a case of laparoscopy-assisted immediate vaginal reconstruction with vertical pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.

Transverse upper abdominal scars in DIEP flaps: pushing the limit of donor site abdominal skin perfusion

We present two immediate breast reconstruction cases utilising deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in the presence of upper transverse abdominal scars and their outcomes. The available evidence in relation to its impact on abdominal skin perfusion and published clinical experience is reviewed.

Seeing White: Management of TIVA during autologous breast reconstruction

Total IntraVenous Anaesthesia is frequently the anaesthetic of choice for enhanced recovery after surgery pathways during breast reconstruction free flap surgery. This relies upon the continuous intravenous infusion of propofol. We describe our experience of two patients where augmentation of a venously congested DIEP flap with a cephalic vein transposition procedure, risked interruption of the intravenous delivery of anaesthesia to the patient. We also share our steps taken to mitigate this risk going forward.

Thoracoacromial artery and vein as main recipient vessels in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap transfer for breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The internal mammary artery/vein (IMA/V) are commonly used recipients for free flap breast reconstruction, but requires costal cartilage resection and limits future use of the IMA. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the thoracoacromial artery/vein (TAA/V) as recipients for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction compared with using the IMA/V.

METHODS

Medical charts of patients who underwent free DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the TAA/V or the IMA/V as recipient vessels were reviewed. Patient and vessel characteristics, time for vessel preparation and anastomosis, and postoperative pain were compared between TAA/V and IMA/V groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included; 12 in TAA/V group, and 22 in IMA/V group. There was no flap failure in both groups. There were statistically significant differences between TAA/V and IMA/V groups in vessel preparation time (10.9 ± 3.7 min vs. 24.1 ± 6.0 min, p < .001), anastomosis time (31.2 ± 12.1 min vs. 42.1 ± 11.2 min, p = .017), and total dose of acetaminophen (4566.7 ± 1015.6 mg vs. 5436.4 ± 1323.3 mg, p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

The TAA/V could be safely used as recipient vessels for DIEP flap breast reconstruction with shorter time and less postoperative pain.

Setting up a new microsurgical breast service in a non-tertiary hospital: Is it safe, and do outcomes compare to centres of excellence?

AIMS

Access to autologous reconstruction continues to be limited in some areas of the United Kingdom. This is, in part, due to the perceived difficulty offering this service outside of a large tertiary centre. We present our experience setting up a new microsurgical breast reconstruction service in a district hospital and compare our results to the published outcomes of large volume centres.

METHODS

Patient data were collected prospectively from the start of the service to date (July 2018- July 2020) with the capture of demographics, management, and outcomes. The BREAST-Q tool was used preoperatively and at a minimum of 3 months.

RESULTS

The first 40 patients undergoing DIEP reconstruction were included. Of these, 70% were immediate, mean age was 49 years (27-68) and BMI was 28.1 kg/m2 (22-32.5). In all, 50% had one or more co-morbidities other than breast cancer. Median length of stay was 3 days (2-6) with 75% of patients discharged on day 2 or 3. Ten patients' stay exceeded 3 days - mostly due to social reasons. Flap loss occurred in 1 patient (2.5%). Twenty-one patients developed complications (52%) within 90 days: seven Clavien-Dindo Grade I, two Grade II and ten Grade IIIb. Fat necrosis and mastectomy flap necrosis were the most common complications. Surgical intervention was higher in those needing adjuvant therapy. Patient-reported outcomes showed post-operative improvement across all domains except abdominal physical well-being at median 11.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the shortest published length of stay for unilateral DIEP reconstructions. We are the first paper to publish patient-reported outcomes following a breast microsurgical enhanced recovery protocol. We demonstrate how a new microsurgical service, utilising an enhanced recovery protocol and careful patient selection can immediately achieve outcomes comparable to well-established centres. There is no reason why all patients should not have access to microsurgical breast reconstruction locally.

Restitution of the NHS breast reconstruction service during the recovery phase of the Covid 19 pandemic

During the recovery restitution phase of the coronavirus pandemic, breast reconstruction teams have faced particular challenges to restarting this essential service. This is due to the length and complexity of the surgery, along with the demands on healthcare staff.

The Royal College of Surgeons have classified immediate breast reconstruction as priority 2 and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have provided a pre-operative pathway for resumption of elective procedures. We therefore describe our experience in restarting our service for providing a breast reconstruction service from the 29th June 2020.

Fat Necrosis After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Review of Perfusion-Related Causes

INTRODUCTION

Fat necrosis is a common complication for the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. A thorough understanding of the factors associated with fat necrosis will aid operative planning for reconstructive surgeons.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed between January 1989 and April 2019. Studies were included if they reported on fat necrosis in DIEP flap or evaluated the perfusion of the DIEP flap. Twenty-eight out of 312 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Fat necrosis rates ranged from 12.0 to 45.0% on clinical examination within the literature. The four main perforator-specific factors identified included perforator perfusion zones, perforator location, perforator number and venous congestion. Medial row perforators have a wider perfusion zone, while lateral row perforators have a narrow perfusion zone. Holm zone III has a higher rate of fat necrosis compared to Holm zone II. One to two perforators and more than five perforators and a Type III atypical connection between the superficial and deep venous system had a higher rate of fat necrosis.

CONCLUSION

The DIEP flap should incorporate between two and three perforators of a substantial calibre; Holm zone III should be excluded if able and careful review of the pre-operative imaging should be performed to analyse the connections between the deep and superficial venous system. There are multiple perfusion-related factors to consider when planning the DIEP flap and ultimately a patient-specific approach to the vascular anatomy is essential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .