1
|
Zhang YR, Sun C, Cheng CL, Gao J, Zhang J, Chen J, Wang LW, Chen Y, Man XH, Shi XG, An W. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for proximal duodenal subepithelial lesions: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6601-6608. [PMID: 35118532 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09068-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used to remove subepithelial lesions (SELs) in recent years; however, duodenal ESD is associated with high rates of immediate or delayed bleeding and perforation. Whether ESD can be recommended for the treatment of duodenal SELs remains controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD for duodenal SELs. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 62 patients (62 lesions) who underwent ESD for duodenal SELs between January 2012 and December 2020. The therapeutic outcomes from ESD for duodenal SELs and procedure-related complications were analyzed. RESULTS En bloc resection and complete resection rates associated with duodenal ESD were 90.3% and 100%, respectively; four patients had a positive microscopic margin on pathologic examination. The median procedure time was 45 min (range 20-106 min). During the procedure, two patients received emergency surgery for uncontrolled bleeding and perforation, respectively. After the procedure, delayed bleeding occurred in three patients (4.8%), which was successfully managed by clipping, and delayed perforation occurred in two patients (3.2%) and needed emergency surgery. Risk factors related to complications were analyzed. Lesion size was found to be significantly associated with the complications (P = 0.028). No recurrences were detected, and no distant metastasis was observed in any patient during a median follow-up period of 45.5 months (range, 6-103 months). CONCLUSION Duodenal ESD is relatively safe and feasible for duodenal SELs, especially for lesions no more than 2 cm in size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Rong Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Chang Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Chun-Li Cheng
- Information Centre, Linfen Central Hospital, Shanxi, China
| | - Jie Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Luo-Wei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Xiao-Hua Man
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Xin-Gang Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Wei An
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|