Determination of procoagulant activity in human normal immunoglobulin preparations for therapeutic use by FXIa chromogenic assay: Evaluation of test kit sensitivity, reference standard performance and product formulation effects on the FXIa assay

In 2010, the reporting of thrombotic adverse events for one subcutaneous and certain intravenous immunoglobulins (IGs) raised some concerns. In Europe, regulatory bodies rapidly revised compendial specifications for therapeutic IGs to ensure they do not exhibit thrombogenic (procoagulant) activity (PCA). At the global level, a working group (GWG) was launched with the aim of assessing PCA measurement methods and limits, considering results obtained by human IG manufacturers during in-process controls. The GWG created three dedicated subgroups to investigate the FXIa chromogenic assay, the non-activated partial thromboplastin time (NAPTT) test and the thrombin generation assay (TGA). The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) was responsible for co-ordinating the subgroup in charge of evaluating the FXIa chromogenic assay in a study that assessed the sensitivity and robustness of two commercial chromogenic FXIa test kits. The impact of IG product formulation on FXIa recovery and the suitability of PCA-containing IG products as potential reference standards/controls were also assessed. IG materials representative of marketed products were provided to four laboratories for a study that was carried out in two steps: 1) two chromogenic FXIa test kit manufacturers assessed the performance and determined optimal test conditions by their respective methods, 2) two OMCLs studied both kits using an optimised study design. Regarding sensitivity, the study results identified suitable dose-response intervals and limits with both chromogenic FXIa test kits. This allowed the establishment of dilution ranges for optimal detection of FXIa/PCA in 5 % and 10 % IG products in the range of 1-6 mIU/mL. However, careful optimisation of the sample dilutions was required (notably to avoid potential matrix effects) and the choice of the mode of data acquisition (kinetic or end-point method) contributed to sensitivity in routine use. Importantly, the composition of IG products was of minor concern for FXIa determination with both test kits. Potential reference materials evaluated in the study behaved as expected and could be useful should a separate reference standard to the FXIa WHO IS be deemed necessary in future.

Alignment of two standard terminologies for dosage form: RxNorm from the National Library of Medicine for the United States and EDQM from the European Directorate for the Quality in Medicines and Healthcare for Europe

BACKGROUND

There is currently no system that aligns pharmaceutically equivalent medicinal products across nations, creating obstacles to transnational medication prescribing and medical research. EDQM has been internationally recognized as the leading system in systematic pharmaceutical product descriptions. RxNorm is a critical terminology based in the US and used widely in applications internationally that would benefit from alignment with EDQM-based dosage form descriptions.

GOAL

Demonstrate a method for alignment of RxNorm dosage forms with EDQM terminologies and with EDQM dosage forms. Describe obstacles and advantages of such an alignment for ultimate application in calculating universal Pharmaceutical Product Identifiers.

METHODS

A pharmaceutical sciences student and a clinical pharmacology expert in dosage forms used definitions supplied by RxNorm and EDQM technical documentation to align the 120 RxNorm dose forms to EDQM-based dosage form description terms. The alignment of RxNorm to EDQM was then used to fit the RxNorm dose forms into an ontology based on EDQM.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The alignment of RxNorm and EDQM requires further validation but provides a potential method of establishing interoperability between the two terminologies without cumbersome manual reclassification. There remain ambiguities within each dosage form nomenclature that create obstacles to integrating medication databases rooted in EDQM and RxNorm into a single worldwide database.

Collaborative study for the validation of cell line assays for in-process toxicity and antigenicity testing of Clostridium septicum vaccine antigens - Part 2: Optimisation of cell line assays

During the production of clostridial vaccines large numbers of mice are used for various in-process control tests. Replacement in vitro assays had been developed for the testing of the toxins and toxoids of several clostridial species, but none of these assays had been assessed in an international collaborative study. Under the common aegis of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) and of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), a project on clostridial vaccines for veterinary use was started as part of the EDQM-co-ordinated Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). Within the framework of this project (coded BSP130) a collaborative study was organised to evaluate Vero cell-based alternative methods to the current mouse tests used to measure: i) the toxicity of Clostridium septicum toxin, ii) the absence of toxicity of C. septicum toxoid and iii) the antigenicity of C. septicum toxoid. The principal aims of the study were to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro assays and to demonstrate concordance of the in vitro and current in vivo tests. The study results demonstrated good concordance, but the information gathered through the study (later on called Part 1) and the participants' workshop prompted the extension of the project in order to further optimise the in vitro protocols and improve their repeatability and reproducibility, which were comparable to but not better than those of the in vivo assays in Part 1. The 3 in vitro assays to be optimised in the extension of the BSP130 project were : i) the in vitro toxin neutralisation equivalence plus (TNE+), as a replacement for the in vivo minimum lethal dose (MLD) test for quantification of the toxicity of toxin; ii) the in vitro MLD, as a replacement for the in vivo MLD test for detection of residual toxicity associated with toxoid; iii) the in vitro total combining power (TCP), as a replacement for the in vivo TCP test for quantification of the antigenicity of toxoid. At this point, the Analytical Method Transfer Laboratory of Ceva-Phylaxia (Hungary), supported by the project management team, developed suitable SOPs for the 3 in vitro assays. These optimised methods were further assessed in BSP130 through a second international collaborative study (Part 2) aimed at defining repeatability and reproducibility in different laboratories and determining the levels of improvement compared with the original in vivo tests and the initial in vitro assays used in Part 1 of the project. Fourteen laboratories, comprising 4 public sector and 10 manufacturers' medicines control laboratories, from 11 countries participated in the collaborative Part 2 study, each testing 6 different C. septicum toxins and 6 C. septicum toxoids. Improved repeatability and reproducibility were observed for the optimised assays. The results of this study confirm the suitability of these assays for in-process control of C. septicum vaccines, with better repeatability and reproducibility than their in vivo equivalents. It is expected that, with appropriate minor changes and the use of relevant reagents, these optimised in vitro assays could be used not only for the assessment of C. septicum toxins and toxoids but for all cytotoxin-based clostridial antigens. The development and implementation of such in vitro assays would offer a great opportunity to significantly reduce animal usage, shorten the duration of QC test procedures and increase the precision of toxicity and antigenicity assays in clostridial veterinary vaccine in-process control. This would also provide more accurate and reproducible dosing of antigens in the final vaccine products, help to promote compendial acceptance and to proffer a basis for improved international harmonisation across this area of product testing.

Establishment of Ph. Eur. Bordetella pertussis mouse antiserum Biological Reference Preparation batches 2, 3 and 4

A project aimed at establishing replacement batches for the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) Bordetella (B.) pertussis mouse antiserum was started in 2013 under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). This BRP is used for the immunogenicity assay in mice to assess the potency of acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines as described in Ph. Eur. general method 2.7.16. Assay of pertussis vaccine (acellular). In a preliminary phase of the project (referred to herein as BSP129 phase 1) a hyper-immune serum pool was produced in mice using a combined aP vaccine as immunogen. This pool was used to generate 3 freeze-dried candidate (c) B. pertussis anti-mouse serum BRP batches (cBRP2, cBRP3 and cBRP4). After the pre-qualification that showed their suitability as candidate batches, an international collaborative study (BSP129 phase 2) was carried out in order to standardise these 3 batches against the current BRP1 in terms of anti-PT, -FHA, -PRN and -FIM2/3 antibody contents. For the sake of continuity with the standardisation of BRP1, the corresponding WHO standard (1RR 97/642) was introduced as a second reference for the calibration of the 3 candidate BRPs. Eleven laboratories took part in phase 2. Ten of them performed the ELISA method they use routinely for aP vaccine batch release and one laboratory performed the Multiplex Immunoassay (MIA) as an alternative test. Four participants titrated the antibodies against all 5 pertussis antigens, 5 participants determined the antibody content against 3 antigens (PT, FHA, PRN), one participant titrated the antibodies against PT and FHA antigens and one laboratory determined the antibody content for the PT antigen only. Details of all ELISA methods used were analysed to evaluate their impact on the calibration of the cBRPs. The variability of the results in relation to the nature and methodology of the tests appeared rather limited. Discrepant titres of cBRPs were measured depending on the reference used: the use of the 1RR induced an overestimation (in 8 out of 11 laboratories) and a large inter-laboratory variation in the calculated titres. Regardless of the reference used, equivalency between the calculated titres of cBRP2 and cBRP3 was observed, whilst cBRP4 had systematically lower titres for all antibodies against the 5 acellular pertussis vaccine components. Based on these observations, it was decided to establish the candidate BRP batches against BRP1 and to assign the following potencies based on the mean values determined through centrally calculated results of the calibration assays performed by ELISA in BSP129 phase 2: For cBRP2 and cBRP3 Anti-pertussis toxin: 37 ELISA Units (ELU) per vial Anti-filamentous haemagglutinin: 114 ELU per vial Anti-pertactin: 44 ELU per vial Anti-fimbrial agglutinogens (FIM2/3): 25 ELU per vial For cBRP4 Anti-pertussis toxin: 32 ELU per vial Anti-filamentous haemagglutinin: 98 ELU per vial Anti-pertactin 38 ELU per vial Anti-fimbrial agglutinogens (FIM2/3):23 ELU per vial In February 2018, BRP2, BRP3 and BRP4 were adopted by correspondence by the Ph. Eur. Commission.

Production and characterisation of a candidate hyper-immune serum for the replacement of the Bordetella pertussis mouse antiserum Biological Reference Preparation

For acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, the current European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph Pertussis vaccine (acellular, component, adsorbed) (1356) requires an immunogenicity assay in mice or guinea pigs to assess the potency of each lot of vaccine (Ph. Eur. general method 2.7.16. Assay of pertussis vaccine (acellular)). This biological assay, carried out on the final bulk of the vaccine lot, is based on the measurement of the specific antibody response to the 5 antigenic components (pertussis toxin (PT), Fimbrial haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN) and Fimbriae 2 and 3 (FIM2/3)) that are present in the combined aP vaccines. In the mouse assay, serum antibody levels are measured by ELISA. The immunogenicity of a vaccine under test is estimated versus a homologous reference vaccine and a reference antiserum e.g. the first Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Bordetella (B.) pertussis mouse anti-serum (BRP1), established in 1998, is used to normalise the titre of antibodies (expressed in ELISA Units (ELU)/mL). In anticipation of the depletion of BRP1 stocks, a project was launched in 2013 by the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) in order to establish a new standardised reference serum. The project, referred to herein as BSP129, was conducted in 2 phases: 1) the production and characterisation of a mouse serum pool (using a multicomponent aP vaccine marketed in Canada similar to the vaccine used in the BRP1 production as immunogen) and of candidate BRP batches (cBRPs) and 2) an international collaborative study aimed at calibrating the cBRPs in terms of antibody levels against PT, FHA, PRN and FIM2/3. This article presents the design and results of the first phase of the collaborative study to establish the optimal conditions for immunisation and bleeding of mice in order to produce a large pool of hyper-immune serum against the 5 antigens. After the characterisation of this pool, cBRP pilot lots were manufactured by freeze-drying diluted solutions of the hyper-immune serum pool. The pilot lots were then characterised in two Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) for their antibody contents against aP vaccine antigens using in-house ELISA (based on methods developed by 2 European vaccine manufacturers) and Multiplex Immunoassay (MIA) methods. The antibody titres recovered demonstrated that a dilution factor of 1/40 could be considered for the scaled-up manufacture of candidate reference preparations (cBRPs). Three batches (15 000 vials) of cBRP were manufactured and fully characterised. In light of the data obtained, and although titration results between the ELISA methods were sometimes discrepant, it was agreed that the establishment study (phase 2) could be launched. Real-time and accelerated stability studies were also included in the first study phase to document the stability of the cBRPs in freeze-dried form and after reconstitution and storage at -20°C±5°C. The results showed that the stability of the freeze-dried cBRPs at usual storage and shipment temperatures is acceptable and that reconstituted cBRP solutions are stable for 12 months at -20°C±5°C. It could therefore be recommended to freeze small aliquots of the 1 mL solution obtained by the reconstitution of one BRP vial in order to store them for use in separate assays. With the application of this strategy, the stocks of the BRP1 replacement batches should cover the needs of OMCLs and manufacturers for at least the next decade.

Collaborative study for the establishment of Infliximab Biological Reference Preparation Batch 1

Two preparations of the chimeric anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody Infliximab were formulated and lyophilised at the National Institute for Biological Standards & Control (NIBSC) prior to evaluation in a collaborative study for their suitability to serve as a World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS)/European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for the potency assay of Infliximab. Twenty-six laboratories tested the preparations using different in vitro cell-based bioassays (TNF-α neutralisation, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity) and binding assays. Amongst them, 19 laboratories performed cell-based bioassays. The results of this study indicated that the candidate preparation coded 16/170 was suitable to serve as an International Standard for Infliximab based on the data obtained for biological activity. This candidate standard was established in 2017 as the first International Standard for Infliximab with an assigned potency for TNF neutralisation activity of 500 IU per ampoule. In the same study, the suitability of preparation 16/170 of Infliximab to serve as the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for the Infliximab potency assay as described in the Ph. Eur. monograph on Infliximab concentrated solution (2928) was also evaluated. The corresponding analysis, based on the measurement of the inhibitory action of anti-human TNF (Infliximab) on the cytotoxic activity of TNF-alpha, was performed using data from a subset of 9 laboratories using the TNF-alpha-sensitive fibrosarcoma cell line WEHI-164. The results obtained were compared to those obtained from different cell-based neutralisation assays that were used by other laboratories in the context of establishing the 1st World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Infliximab. Based on the analyses, preparation 16/170 was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission in June 2018 as Infliximab BRP batch 1 with an assigned potency of 500 IU per ampoule.

Collaborative study for the validation of cell line assays for in-process toxicity and antigenicity testing of Clostridium septicum vaccine antigens - Part 1

Large numbers of mice are used in testing during the production of Clostridial vaccines. Previous work has indicated that cell line assays could replace mouse tests for certain aspects of this testing. Replacement assays have been developed for the testing of the toxins and toxoids of several clostridial species but none of these assays have been assessed in an international collaborative study. Under the common aegis of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) and of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), collaborative study BSP130 was initiated to evaluate Vero cell based alternative methods to the current mouse tests used to measure the toxicity of Clostridium septicum toxin (the minimum lethal dose (MLD) test), the freedom from toxicity of C. septicum toxoid (the MLD test) and the antigenicity of C. septicum toxoid (the total combining power (TCP) test). The principal aims of BSP130 were to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro assays and to demonstrate concordance of the proposed in vitro and current in vivo TCP and MLD tests. 11 laboratories from 7 countries participated in the collaborative study and each tested 6 toxins and 6 toxoids. The participants' Vero cell lines were up to 1 000 times more sensitive than the mouse strains. The MLD assay in mice and on Vero cells generally ranked the toxins in a similar order in most of the laboratories. The TCP assay in mice and on Vero cells also generally ranked the toxoids in a similar order in most of the laboratories. The results demonstrate that the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro Vero cell based assays are no worse than that of the in vivo assays and that they are easily transferable to other laboratories. The concordance correlations between the in vivo and in vitro methods were for the MLD assays ρc=0.961 (log-transformed values) and ρc=0.921 (non-log-transformed values) and for the TCP assays ρc=0.968 (log-transformed values) and ρc=0.980 (non log-transformed values). These correlations are excellent showing that the Vero cell assays can be used as alternatives to the mouse tests for the assessment of C. septicum toxin MLD and toxoid TCP values. This study can be used by vaccine manufacturing companies as a guide for applying the same approach to other clostridial toxins and toxoids.

Establishment of a candidate equine influenza Florida Clade 2 strain A/eq/Richmond/1/07 horse antiserum as Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation/OIE International Reference Reagent

Equine influenza (EI) is an important respiratory disease of horses, with welfare and economic consequences. Vaccination remains one of the most efficient prevention methods available. Equine influenza virus (EIV) is constantly evolving and consequently EI vaccines need to be updated on a regular basis. In 2010, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Expert Surveillance Panel (ESP) on EI provided a new recommendation for EI vaccine strain composition, including the incorporation of representative EIV strains of both Florida Clade 1 and Clade 2 sub-lineages (FC1 and FC2, respectively). In this context, the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) - OIE reference panel for EI had to be complemented by an antiserum raised in horses against the FC2 representative EIV strain A/eq/Richmond/1/07. An international collaborative study was organised and managed by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) within the framework of its Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). The study aimed at evaluating a new candidate reference for use as a common OIE International Standard/Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) horse antiserum to FC2 EIV A/equine/Richmond/1/07. The standard was to be established using the SRH and HI tests for subsequent use in immunogenicity, efficacy and batch potency assay of EI vaccines as a Ph. Eur. BRP (Ph. Eur. monograph 0249) and for use in clinical diagnostic tests as an OIE-approved International Standard Reagent (OIE chapter 3.5.7). The collaborative study confirmed the suitability of the candidate and an SRH titre was assigned. The candidate was adopted as a BRP by the Ph. Eur. Commission and approved by the OIE Biological Standards Commission as an International Standard Serum in November 2017 and February 2018, respectively.

Quality Control of Immunological Veterinary Medicinal Products in Europe

Medicinal products in Europe are under the strict control of many organisations headed by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) in Strasbourg and its related General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) Network (GEON). The EDQM works in cooperation with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the World Health Organisation (WHO). All of these institutions have one main goal – to protect public health in Europe and around the world. One of the more important effects of the harmonisation of pharmaceutical law in Europe was the introduction of the mutual recognition principle for the Official Control Authority Batch Release (OCABR)/Official Batch Protocol Review (OBPR) certificates in the European Union. The National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI) in Poland is an example of an OMCL laboratory within the Veterinary Batch Release Network (VBRN) that issues the European certificates. The NVRI is actively involved in the batch release of immunological veterinary medicinal products (IVMPs), with approximately 1,800 certificates for IVMPs issued per year. It is also one of only four veterinary OMCLs that perform Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) studies including approximately 47 IVMPs per year. All the results of the testing data are sent to the Chief Veterinary Officer, and also to the electronic Network platforms of the EDQM, which enables transparent information exchange.

[European Network of Official Medicines Control Laboratories : International OMCL Working Group Combating Counterfeit and other Illegal Medicines]

Official medicines control laboratories (OMCLs) have for a long time been involved in testing activities related to suspected counterfeit or other illegal medicines in a number of European countries in support of national enforcement authorities. With the secretarial support of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), from 2005 onwards, the General European OMCL Network (GEON) has gradually introduced for its members tailored tools, joint test programmes and information/discussion platforms in the field of falsified medicines testing. Since 2011 a dedicated OMCL working group (OMCL Counterfeit/Illegal Medicines Working Group) has taken the lead in coordinating the different activities, which range from training programmes, symposia and focus topics at annual meetings to the development and improvement of databases and the drafting of common documents. The overall goal of these activities is to share know-how, to establish and identify centres of expertise, to further develop competencies in the field of analysis of falsified medicines, to challenge the competency of OMCLs in the testing of unknown samples, to raise awareness of the network and to leverage synergies in particular with respect to this field of expertise. All these measures aim at strengthening the network in the combat against falsified medicines, enlarging the field of activities of the OMCLs in this area and improving the hit rate with respect to the identification of adulterations.

Official batch control of influenza vaccines: Is it still useful?

INTRODUCTION

The governmental quality control of human vaccines is a long established tradition in many European countries. In Germany, vaccines have been controlled by a governmental agency since 1935. In the beginning, vaccine production and control was a purely national activity. However, that changed fundamentally in 1994 when the so-called Official Control Authority Batch Release Network (OCABR) was implemented shortly after the establishment of the European Union. Today, Official Medicinal Control Laboratories (OMCLs) are part of the European OCABR Network. In many European countries, OMCLs experimentally test every batch of human vaccines before they enter the market. We wanted to gain insights into the benefits of batch release by the Network and address the question whether batch release is still useful. This question was investigated in the context of influenza vaccines.

METHODS

Notifications on influenza vaccines circulated from 2006 to 2016 within the OCABR network were compiled and organized into 32 cases. The impact of these findings was evaluated, and the communication pathways between companies and respective European control laboratories were examined.

RESULTS

Approximately 5850 batches were tested by the OMCL network between 2006 and 2016. Among these, notifications belonging to 32 cases were observed. The predominant proportion of the circulated notifications related to manufacturing issues. In most cases, the manufacturer itself had withdrawn the batches before they entered the market. However, in three cases, batches of insufficient quality were detected by the respective European Control Laboratory leading to withdrawal of 13 batches.

CONCLUSION

13 batches which did not meet the specifications of influenza vaccine were detected by the OMCL network between 2006 and 2016 which would not have been identified by the manufacturer. This demonstrates the impact of governmental batch release. Together with the intrinsic values of the OCABR system and keeping in mind that vaccines are given to healthy often young individuals, governmental batch release of influenza vaccines is still justified.

Participation of industry experts in the elaboration of monographs and chapters of the European Pharmacopoeia

The European Pharmacopoeia represents an important element in the European regulatory system for medicines. It is elaborated in a co-operation of experts from authorities, academia and industry, assisted by scientific staff from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). This article describes the principles of its elaboration with particular focus on the involvement of industry experts.

Collaborative study for the establishment of the WHO 3(rd) International Standard for Endotoxin, the Ph. Eur. endotoxin biological reference preparation batch 5 and the USP Reference Standard for Endotoxin Lot H0K354

An international collaborative study was organised jointly by the World Health Organization (WHO)/National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM/Council of Europe) for the establishment of harmonised replacement endotoxin standards for these 3 organisations. Thirty-five laboratories worldwide, including Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) and manufacturers enrolled in the study. Three candidate preparations (10/178, 10/190 and 10/196) were produced with the same material and same formulation as the current reference standards with the objective of generating a new (3(rd)) International Standard (IS) with the same potency (10 000 IU/vial) as the current (2(nd)) IS, as well as new European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.). and USP standards. The suitability of the candidate preparations to act as the reference standard in assays for endotoxin performed according to compendial methods was evaluated. Their potency was calibrated against the WHO 2(nd) IS for Endotoxin (94/580). Gelation and photometric methods produced similar results for each of the candidate preparations. The overall potency estimates for the 3 batches were comparable. Given the intrinsic assay precision, the observed differences between the batches may be considered unimportant for the intended use of these materials. Overall, these results were in line with those generated for the establishment of the current preparations of reference standards. Accelerated degradation testing of vials stored at elevated temperatures supported the long-term stability of the 3 candidate preparations. It was agreed between the 3 organisations that batch 10/178 be shared between WHO and EDQM and that batches 10/190 and 10/196 be allocated to USP, with a common assigned value of 10 000 IU/vial. This value maintains the continuity of the global harmonisation of reference materials and unitage for the testing of endotoxins in parenteral pharmaceutical products. Based on the results of the collaborative study, batch 10/178 was established by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission as the Ph. Eur. Endotoxin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 5. The same batch was also established by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation (ECBS) of WHO as the WHO 3(rd) IS for Endotoxin. Batch 10/190 was adopted as the USP Endotoxin Reference Standard, lot H0K354 and vials from this same batch (10/190) will serve as the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) Endotoxin Standard, EC-7.

A multi-dose serological assay suitable to quantify the potency of inactivated rabies vaccines for veterinary use

The mouse vaccination-challenge test, which is the most widely used method for determining the potency of inactivated rabies vaccines, is imprecise, time-consuming, and causes severe distress to the test animals. An alternative single-dose serological method has been implemented in the European Pharmacopoeia Monograph 0451 to replace the mouse challenge test for batch release. This single-dose limit method provides semi-quantitative results, but is not suitable for quantifying potency. We have now extended this serological method to a multi-dose format which allows a quantification of vaccine potency. In studies including all rabies vaccine strains relevant for Europe, we found dose-dependency for all vaccines and standard preparations. We have demonstrated that the multi-dose serological approach provides reliable quantitative potency results and is more precise than the mouse vaccination-challenge test. We have shown that adjuvanted vaccines can be calibrated against non-adjuvanted material, and that reference material can be calibrated against the International Standard. The method is therefore capable of assigning potency with the additional advantage of requiring fewer animals and reducing distress. Once the applicability of the method has been further verified in a collaborative study, it can complement the single-dose assay and eventually eliminate the need for the mouse challenge test.

Genetic strain modification of a live rabies virus vaccine widely used in Europe for wildlife oral vaccination

In Europe, the main reservoir and vector of rabies has been the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Oral immunization of foxes with live vaccines, using attenuated rabies strains (SAD B19, SAD Bern), apathogenic mutants of an attenuated strain (SAG2) and the vaccinia-rabies glycoprotein recombinant virus vaccine (V-RG), has been shown to be the most effective method for the control and elimination of rabies. Among all vaccines currently used for wildlife oral vaccination, one vaccine (marketed as SAD Bern strain) has been widely used in Europe since 1992 with the distribution of 17million of baits in 2011. Because of the potential environmental safety risk of a live virus which could revert to virulence, the full genome sequencing of this vaccine was undertaken and the sequence was characterized and compared with those of referenced rabies viruses. The vaccine showed higher similarity to the strains belonging to the SAD B19 vaccine virus strains than to the SAD Bern vaccines. This study is the first one reporting on virus strain identity changes in this attenuated vaccine.