A critique of financial neoliberalism: a perspective combining multidisciplinary methods and commodity markets

The era of financialization bas been marked by a huge increase in the size of the financial sector. The economic justifications for this expansion arise from the prevailing neo-liberal ideology; they are based on arguments like leading role of markets, economic efficiency, reallocation and spreading of risk. Given these reasons, financialization can be viewed as a form of neoliberalism and then we can use the term financial neoliberalism (Palley in Financialization: the economics of finance capital domination. Springer, 2016) to denote it. This commentary paper hopes to complement this view by highlighting the usefulness of recent “multidisciplinary” methods (i.e., methods which do not fall within the usual economic discipline). We focus first on the definition of financialization process, second on its implications on the commodity markets, and third and finally on the importance of the role of multidisciplinary methods, applied to these markets, capable of highlighting the contradictions of the neoliberalism framework, in such a way, we hope, to promote further research.

Does COVID-19 open a Pandora's box of changing the connectedness in energy commodities?

With the rapid spread of coronavirus, the global financial markets have been undergoing tremendous changes, which bring investors more risks in the short term. Against such background, this study concentrates on the far-reaching energy commodities, aiming to explore the impact of COVID-19 on cross-market linkages. To capture the dynamic nature of interdependence, we applied the TVP-VAR based connectedness index method and individually focused on the total, net, and pairwise connectedness. The empirical results show that there is a dramatic rise in the total connectedness in energy markets following the outbreak of COVID-19, but this change only lasted about two months and then fell back to the prior level. Further analyzing the net spillover conditions, we find that the connectedness structure has also displayed some temporary changes. At last, the spillover networks indicate that there are only three pairwise connectedness relations have changed in direction before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. We also try to discuss the underlying COVID-19 shock propagation mechanism, and the results suggest the significant mediation effect of the financial panic risk. In general, our study offers several urgent and prominent implications to understand the financial impact of COVID-19.