Laparoscopic removal of Essure device techniques, perioperative findings and evaluation of patient's satisfaction: A case series

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative outcomes and symptom resolution in women undergoing Essure removal.

METHODS

Single centre cohort study at a large University Teaching Hospital in the UK. Symptoms and Quality of life (QoL) were assessed using a standardised questionnaire administered at 6-months and up to 10-years following removal of Essure® devices.

RESULTS

61 women underwent surgical removal of Essure® devices representing 61/1087 (5.6%) of all women undergoing this hysteroscopic form of sterilization. Patients who had Essure® removal were more likely to have a previous caesarean section [38% vs 18%; OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6; P <0.001]. The main indication for removal was pelvic pain (49/61, 80%). Removal was achieved by laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy/cornuectomy (44/61,71%) or hysterectomy (17/61, 28%). At surgery, perforated device was seen in 4/61 (7%) cases. 26/61 (43%) of patients had concomitant pelvic pathology; 12/26 (46%) had fibrous adhesions, 8/26 (31%) endometriosis, 4/26 (15%) adenomyosis, and 2/26 (8%) had endometriosis and adenomyosis. 10 patients underwent further procedure following removal for ongoing symptoms. 55/61 women (90%) responded to the post removal symptom questionnaire. Most respondents to the quality of life survey 42/55 (76%) reported total or some improvement. 42/53 (79%) had total or some improvement in pelvic pain, 9/13 (69%) in mental health and 10/12 (83%) in bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Surgical removal of Essure® devices appears to improve symptoms thought to be attributable to the presence of these uterine implants in most women. However, patients should be counselled that one in five women may experience persistent or even worsening symptoms.

Surgical techniques for the removal of Essure® microinserts: a literature review on current practice

PURPOSE

To evaluate the different techniques for Essure^® microinserts removal and to assess the risk of fracture of the device and the intra- and post-operative complications in relation to surgical technique variants.

METHODS

Electronic search in Medline, Scopus and Embase databases using the following keywords: Essure; Essure removal; Essure surgical technique.

RESULTS

Out of 95 articles in the initial database, 17 studies were eligible for inclusion in our literature review. Several surgical techniques have been described in which the most frequent were laparoscopic salpingectomy (LS), laparoscopic cornuectomy (LC), laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy (LH, VH) with en-bloc salpingectomy. There were more fractures of the device with the LS procedure (6.25%) followed by the LC technique (2.77%), while there was no fracture with hysterectomy. However, peri-and post-operative complications were more severe and frequent with hysterectomy in comparison with the LC and LS procedures (respectively 8.1% Clavien Dindo grade 3 for the hysterectomy group, 1.11% for the LC procedure and 0.69% for the LS technique).

CONCLUSION

Due to the lack of standardised surgical treatment guidelines, a system of care networks for symptomatic patients with adverse effects related to Essure^® headed by specialised centres may offer a suitable and high-quality management with the appropriate removal techniques within two objectives: limiting the risk of fracture (with an en-bloc removal of the Essure^® microinserts) and avoiding intra- and post-operative complications.

Essure removal for device-attributed symptoms: Quality of life evaluation before and after surgical removal

INTRODUCTION

Increasing reports of adverse effects have raised concerns about the Essure hysteroscopic sterilization method. Women suffering alleged complications of the Essure device often seek surgical removal. This study evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and postoperative outcomes in women undergoing Essure removal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This observational case series included 95 women. Removal was performed by laparoscopic salpingectomy-cornuectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. QoL was assessed preoperatively and three months postoperatively by SF-36 questionnaires [correlated physical health score (PCS) and mental health scores (MCS)]. Symptoms evolution was collected at three months, and complications at one month.

RESULTS

Sixty-four laparoscopic salpingectomy-cornuectomies, 33 laparoscopic hysterectomies, and eight vaginal hysterectomies were performed. Four intraoperative complications occurred (one conversion from cornuectomy to laparoscopic hysterectomy, one skin burn, two bladder injuries). Seven postoperative complications occurred (Clavien Dindo, grade 1 or 2). All components of the preoperative QoL scores were lower than those of the general population. PCS scores were lower preoperatively than postoperatively [37.6 versus 50.7; p<0.001]. MCS scores were lower preoperatively than postoperatively [29 versus 52.4; p<0.001]. 71% of patients showed an improvement of at least 10% in both PCS and MCS scores. Systemic and gynecologic symptoms were more frequent before than after surgery (98% versus 50%; p<0.001 and 77% versus 20%; p<0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients seeking Essure removal had an impaired preoperative QoL. They experienced a significant QoL improvement at three months post-operation. These findings will help clinicians to inform patients about their expected postoperative functional status and QoL.

A Novel Technique for Essure Reversal

Background and Objectives:

An increasing number of women are seeking removal of the Essure sterilization device due to symptoms including pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, and allergic reaction. A fraction of these women also desire a future pregnancy and request sterilization reversal at the time of device removal. We present a novel technique for Essure reversal in addition to our experience with three cases.

Methods:

Simultaneous laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is used to remove the device followed by laparoscopic reimplantation of the distal fallopian tube to the uterine fundus. A video of our method is included and the outcomes of three patients reported.

Results:

Three women underwent laparoscopic Essure reversal for device-attributed symptoms and desire to restore fertility between 2017 and 2018. All procedures were uncomplicated with restoration of tubal patency in one or both fallopian tubes on follow-up hysterosalpingogram. Over a period of 4 to 10 months of followup, no pregnancies have been reported.

Conclusion:

Essure reversal is a feasible technique for removing the device and restoring tubal patency; however, more data are needed on pregnancy outcomes following this novel procedure.

Combined hysteroscopy-laparoscopy approach for excision of pelvic nitinol fragment from Essure contraceptive device: Role of intraoperative fluoroscopy for uterine conservation

We describe the successful removal of a pelvic contraceptive coil in a symptomatic 46-year-old patient who had Essure devices for four years, using a combined hysteroscopy-laparoscopy-fluoroscopy approach. Following normal hysteroscopy, at laparoscopy the right Essure implant was disrupted and its outer nitinol coil had perforated the fallopian tube. However, the inner rod (containing polyethylene terephthalate) had migrated to an extrapelvic location, near the proximal colon. In contrast, the left implant was situated within the corresponding tube. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to confirm complete removal of the device, which was further verified by postoperative computed tomography. The patient's condition improved after surgery and she continues to do well. This is the first report to describe this technique in managing Essure complications remote from time of insertion. Our case highlights the value and limitations of preoperative and intraoperative imaging to map Essure fragment location before surgery.