Nomenclature for standardized designation of diploid genotypes in genetically modified laboratory animals

Information about the diploid genotype of a gene-modified or mutant laboratory animal is essential for breeding and experimental planning. It is also required for the exchange of animals between different research groups or for communication with professional genotyping service providers. While there are detailed, standardized rules for creating an allele name of a genome modification or mutation, the notation of the diploid genotype after biopsy and genotyping has not been standardized yet. Therefore, a uniform, generally understandable nomenclature for the diploid genotype of gene-modified laboratory animals is needed. With the here-proposed nomenclature recommendations from the Committee on Genetics and Breeding of Laboratory Animals of the German Society for Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS), we provide a practical, standardized representation of the genotype of gene-modified animals. It is intended to serve as a compact guide for animal care and scientific personnel in animal research facilities and to simplify data exchange between groups and with external service providers.

History of genome editing: From meganucleases to CRISPR

CRISPR-mediated genome editing has undoubtedly revolutionized genetic engineering of animals. With the ability for virtually unlimited modification of almost any genome it is easy to forget which amazing discoveries paved the way for this ground-breaking technology. Here, we summarize the history of genome editing platforms, starting from enhanced integration of foreign DNA by meganuclease-mediated double-strand breaks to CRISPR/Cas9, the leading technology to date, and its re-engineered variants.

Phytoestrogen-containing diets offer benefits for mouse embryology but lead to fewer offspring being produced

One of the most commonly used protein sources in rodent diets is soy, which is naturally rich in phytoestrogens. Although phytoestrogens have shown potential health benefits in humans, they may also have the ability to disrupt reproduction. Consequently, there has been a tendency to try to exclude them from rodent diets. In the current study, we investigated whether phytoestrogen content in the mouse diet could affect reproduction in mice used as embryo donors. Donor mice (C57BL/6JOlaHsd) were maintained with three different diets: high phytoestrogen (ca. 400 mg/kg genistein), low phytoestrogen (ca. 10 mg/kg genistein) and standard breeding diet (ca. 120 mg/kg genistein). Mice fed a high phytoestrogen diet had a high yield of plugs, embryos, and injectable embryos, as well as producing good quality embryos. Results from donor mice fed a low phytoestrogen diet were consistently but only slightly inferior, whereas mice fed a standard diet performed the poorest. Interestingly, the largest number of born and weaned offspring were observed when recipient females received embryos from the standard diet group. Sperm yield and quality of stud males did not differ between the groups. We surmize that for experimental endpoints requiring fertilized embryos it may be more beneficial to feed mice a diet containing phytoestrogen, but if the goal is to produce transgenic mice, a diet high in phytoestrogen may be inadvisable. In conclusion, care should be taken when selecting a diet for experimental mouse colonies as phytoestrogen could influence the study outcome.

Mouse reproductive fitness is maintained up to an ambient temperature of 28℃ when housed in individually-ventilated cages

Production of genetically-modified mice is strongly dependent on environmental conditions. Mice are commonly housed at 22℃, which is significantly lower than their thermoneutral zone. But, when given a choice, mice often seem to prefer higher ambient temperatures. In the current study we investigated the effect of higher ambient temperature on the production of transgenic mice, with emphasis on embryo and sperm yield and quality. Mice (C57BL/6JOlaHsd) were housed under four different ambient temperatures (22, 25, 28 and 30℃). Female mice were superovulated, and mated with males. As indicators for reproductive fitness, the success of the mating was observed, including embryo yield and quality, as well as sperm count, motility and progressivity. Female mice were found to produce high amounts of high quality embryos from 22 to 28℃. Sperm count dropped continuously from 22 to 30℃, but sperm motility and progressivity remained high from 22 to 28℃. We conclude that mice can be housed at significantly higher temperatures than is commonly recommended without compromising embryo production and quality, or sperm quality. These results could lead to fundamental changes in how mouse facilities are built and operated - especially in warmer climates whereby energy consumption and therefore costs could be significantly reduced.