Incidence and risk of remnant gastric cancer after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) constitutes a major global health problem, of which remnant gastric cancer (RGC) occurs less frequently. The rate of RGCs after gastrectomy for GC is increasing recently due to improved survival and screening, however, their incidence and risk have not been reported in the U.S.

POPULATION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and elevated risk of RGC after GC gastrectomy in this population, and to identify the risk factors.

METHODS

Patients underwent gastrectomy for first primary GC in 2000-2015 and those who developed RGC were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Fine-Gray regression was used to estimate the cumulative incidence and to identify risk factors. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by Poisson regression to compare the risk with the general population.

RESULTS

Among 21,566 patients included in the cohort, 227 developed RGC. The 20-year cumulative incidence of RGC was 1.88%. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, invasion depth, male sex, marital status, and lower income are independent risk factors for RGC development. SIR was 7.70 overall and > 4.5 in each stratum.

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative incidence and risk for RGCs increased continuously in patients underwent GC gastrectomy. Close and lifelong endoscopy surveillance should be recommended for patients who received GC gastrectomy, especially those with high-risk factors.

PYloroplasty versus No Intervention in GAstric REmnant REconstruction after Oesophagectomy: study protocol for the PYNI-GAREREO phase III randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

After esophagectomy for esophageal and esophagogastric cancer, more than half of patients have lost > 10% of their body weight at 12 months. In most cases, the gastric remnant is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy. One of the most serious nutritional complications of this technique is delayed gastric emptying caused by gastric remnant mobilization and denervation of the vagus nerve. The aim of the PYloroplasty versus No Intervention in GAstric REmnant REconstruction after Oesophagectomy (PYNI-GAREREO) trial is to analyze the clinical outcome of modified Horsley pyloroplasty (mH-P) as a method of preventing delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS

The PYNI-GAREREO trial is designed as an open randomized, single-center superiority trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to undergo gastric remnant reconstruction with mH-P (intervention group) or no intervention (control group) in parallel groups. All patients with esophageal cancer or esophagogastric cancer planning to undergo curative minimally invasive esophagectomy will be considered for inclusion. A total of 140 patients will be included in the study and randomized between the groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the body weight change at 6 months postoperatively, and the secondary outcomes are the nutritional status, postoperative complications, functional outcome, and quality of life until 1 year postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesize that mH-P after minimally invasive esophagectomy more effectively maintains patients' nutritional status than no pyloroplasty.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000045104. Registered on 25 August 2021. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051346 .

Lymph node distribution in patients with remnant gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is defined as a carcinoma that develops in the gastric remnant from 5 years after gastrectomy, regardless of the primary gastric disease. The pattern of lymph node dissemination in these patients is not well understood. The present study aims to understand the lymph node distribution of patients with RGC in a single center.

METHODS

In a total of 1380 patients with gastric cancer, between 1998 and 2020, 43 patients operated on for RGC were analyzed. The pattern of lymph node dissemination was evaluated based on the number of dissected lymph node stations, the number of positive lymph node stations, the positivity index at each analyzed station, the number of dissected lymph nodes per patient, and the positivity index per lymph node station.

RESULTS

A mean of 13.0 ± 8.1 lymph nodes were dissected. The incidence of lymph node involvement by dissected station was higher at Stations 19, 11p, 3, 4sb and 7 (50, 40, 37.5, 36 and 31.7%, respectively). Among the positive dissected stations, Station 3 with 52.2%, 4sb with 39.1% and 4sa with 34.8% were the most affected.

CONCLUSION

There was no predilection for lymph node involvement when comparing the lesser and greater gastric curvature. The dissection of Stations 3, 4sb and 4sa is fundamental in surgical treatment with curative purposes. The totalization of gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy of the perigastric and supra-pancreatic stations should be the surgery of choice.

Oversewing staple line of the gastric remnant in gastric bypass reduces postoperative bleeding

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a surgery with low rate complications. However, it is not exempt from them, and 1–6% suffer complications such as postoperative bleeding. Many intraoperative techniques have been evaluated to reduce postoperative bleeding, like the oversewing or reinforcement of the staple line. This study aims to evaluate the rate of postoperative bleeding in the oversewing of the staple line of the gastric remnant group versus the stapling only group.

Methods

This is a 2-center, case-control study. We randomly selected two groups who underwent RYGB or OAGB: group A (n = 225) with oversewing from 2019 to 2020 and group B (n = 225) with stapling only between the period of 2017–2018; both groups with similar demographic characteristics.

Results

The overall mean age was 37.39 ± 9.6 years and mean BMI was 41.59 ± 8.6 kg/m2; the postoperative bleeding rate was significantly lower (p < 0,05) in patients with oversewing of the staple line of the gastric remnant. Operative time was shorter for the stapling only group and the difference between the mean operative time was 10.6 min.

Conclusions

Oversewing the staple line of the gastric remnant significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative bleeding regardless of BMI. Being a cost-effective technique compared to others available despite the increase in operating time.

•

Postoperative bleeding represents an important complication in bariatric surgery, which involves high costs.

•

Among the methods of reinforcement, the oversewing of the staple line represents a cost-effective technique.

•

Reinforcement of the gastric remnant staple line can decrease postoperative bleeding without considerably increasing time.

Remnant gastric cancer: An ordinary primary adenocarcinoma or a tumor with its own pattern?

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is defined as a tumor that develops in the stomach after a previous gastrectomy and is generally associated with a worse prognosis. However, there little information available regarding RGCs and their prognostic factors and survival.

AIM

To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of RGC after previous gastrectomy for benign disease.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative resection for primary gastric cancer (GC) at our institute between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. All RGC resections with histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. Primary proximal GC (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy was selected as the comparison group. Clinical and pathological data were collected from a prospective medical database.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients with RGC and 120 PGC were included. Older age (P = 0.001), lower body mass index (P = 0.006), hemoglobin level (P < 0.001), and number of resected lymph nodes resected (LN) (P < 0.001) were associated with the RGC group. Lauren type, pathological tumor-node-metastasis, and perioperative morbimortality were similar between RGC and PGC. There was no difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.592) and overall survival (P = 0.930) between groups. LN status was the only independent factor related to survival.

CONCLUSION

RGC had similar clinicopathological characteristics to PGC. Despite the lower number of resected LN, RGC had a similar prognosis.

Expression profiles of gastric cancer molecular subtypes in remnant tumors

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a carcinoma arising in the stomach remnant after previous gastric resection. It is frequently reported as a tumor with a poor prognosis and distinct biological features from primary gastric cancer (PGC). However, as it is less frequent, its profile regarding the current molecular classifications of gastric cancer has not been evaluated.

AIM

To evaluate a cohort of RGC according to molecular subtypes of GC using a panel of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to determine whether the expression profile is different between PGC and RGC.

METHODS

Consecutive RGC patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2009 and 2019 were assessed using seven GC panels: Epstein-Barr virus in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins (MutL homolog 1, MutS homolog 2, MutS homolog 6, and PMS1 homolog 2), p53 protein, and E-cadherin expression. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival of these patients were compared to 284 PGC patients.

RESULTS

A total of 40 RGC patients were enrolled in this study. Compared to PGC, older age (P < 0.001), male (P < 0.001), lower body mass index (P = 0.010), and lower hemoglobin level (P < 0.001) were associated with RGC patients. No difference was observed regarding Lauren’s type and pathologic Tumor Node Metastasis stage between the groups. Regarding the profiles evaluated, EBV-positive tumors were higher in RGC compared to PGC (P = 0.039). The frequency of microsatellite instability, aberrant p53 immunostaining, and loss of E-cadherin expression were similar between RGC and PGC. Higher rates of simultaneous alterations in two or more profiles were observed in RGC compared to PGC (P < 0.001). According to the molecular classification, the subtypes were defined as EBV in nine (22.5%) cases, microsatellite instability in nine (22.5%) cases, genomically stable in one (2.5%) case, and chromosomal instability in 21 (52.5%) cases. There was no significant difference in survival between molecular subtypes in RGC patients.

CONCLUSION

RGC was associated with EBV positivity and higher rates of co-altered expression profiles compared to PGC. According to the molecular classification, there was no significant difference in survival between the subtypes of RGC.

The Role of Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) in Cholelithiasis Management After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) for Morbid Obesity: Results of a Monocentric Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery leads to rapid weight loss, a well-known risk factor for gallstone formation. Postoperative biliary complication rate requiring cholecystectomy is between 0.9 and 7.5% after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and between 6 and 50% after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Several authors recommended ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) administration to reduce gallstone formation after diet-induced weight reduction. The aim of this randomized monocentric study is to evaluate gallstone incidence after prophylactic administration of UDCA in patients undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

METHODS

Patients undergoing OAGB were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: the UDCA group receiving oral UDCA 600 mg/days for 6 months in the immediate postoperative days, and the control group not administered with UDCA. Each group included 95 patients. Abdominal ultrasound, clinical evaluation, and quality of life scoring with Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) were performed postoperatively in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months of postoperative follow-up, 4 (4.2%) and 24 patients (25.2%) showed gallstones in the UDCA group and control group, respectively (p < 0.05). Among those who developed gallstones, 8 (28.6%) cases were symptomatic whereas 20 (71.4%) did not show any symptom. No statistically significant difference in GIQLI score between the two groups was found.

CONCLUSION

OAGB, as other malabsorbent procedures, appears to have higher rate of cholelithiasis than purely restrictive procedures. In our prospective randomized controlled study, a regular postoperative UDCA intake during the first 6 months seems to significantly reduce cholelithiasis incidence after OAGB, with no case of intolerance reported. Further studies are needed to assess this issue.

Management of Acute Gastric Remnant Complications After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Single-Center Case Series

PURPOSE

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a common bariatric procedure. Its configuration creates an excluded gastric remnant, which is subject to potential acute complications such as bleeding, perforation, and necrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospective database including all patients presenting between 2007 and 2019 to our institution with acute gastric remnant complications after RYGB was performed.

RESULTS

Seven patients were included, including 3 hemorrhages, two of which were treated with double-balloon enteroscopy, as well as 3 perforations and 1 necrosis, all of which required emergent surgery. Overall gastric remnant complication rate was 0.3% in this series.

CONCLUSION

Acute gastric remnant complications after RYGB are infrequent, but their diagnosis and management can be challenging. Double-balloon enteroscopy has diagnostic and therapeutic value for selected patients. Emergent surgery remains the standard of care for unstable patients and should not be delayed.

Perforated pyloric ulcer 13 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A case report

•

Bariatric surgical procedures increase as the prevalence for obesity rises.

•

A perforated pyloric ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a rare complication.

•

Due to the changed anatomy, no free air was found in the CT-scan in our patient.

•

H. Pylori testing was positive in the blood test and negative in the stool sample.

Introduction and importance

Bariatric or metabolic surgery is an emerging surgical specialty. With the increase of obesity and affiliated complications, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass became a well-established procedure worldwide.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 46-year-old female patient who presented herself in the emergency department with diffuse abdominal pain, 13 years after a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The CT scan found suspicions of an internal hernia. The diagnostic laparoscopy showed a perforated pyloric ulcer of the gastric remnant as well as an internal hernia without any signs of incarceration. The ulcer was repaired by laparoscopic suture and the mesenteric defect at the enteroenterostomy was closed. The testing for H. pylori by different means showed a negative (stool) and a positive (serology) result.

Clinical discussion

The loss of connection of the gastric remnant to the oesophagus poses challenges in the diagnostic process: in regard to the perforated ulcer, free air, the most common sign, is absent, and testing of H. pylori presents limited options.

Conclusion

Bariatric patients remain patients with special considerations even long after undergoing these surgeries because of the drastic change in their anatomy and metabolism. Furthermore, due to the aforementioned reasons, diagnostic by clinical findings and imaging can be difficult and these patients should undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy and multimodal testing for H. pylori.

Ulcer Disease in the Excluded Segments after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Current Review of the Literature

Ulcer disease in excluded segments after Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is rare but can evolve into a life-threatening situation. The excluded segments exhibit a different behavior from that of non-altered anatomy; perforated ulcers do not result in pneumoperitoneum or free fluid, and therefore must be met with a low threshold for surgical exploration. The anatomical changes after RYGB impede routine access to the remnant stomach and duodenum. There are various options to address bleeding or perforated ulcers. While oversewing and drainage preserves the anatomy and forgoes resection, remnant gastrectomy offers a definitive solution. The importance of traditional risk factors such as smoking or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is unclear. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and secondary prophylaxis with proton-pump inhibitors is advisable, albeit in double-dose.

Endoscopic approach to gastric remnant outlet obstruction after gastric bypass: A case report

BACKGROUND

Acute gastric remnant bleeding is a rare complication of bariatric surgery. Furthermore, acute bleeding from the gastric remnant resulting in gastric remnant outlet obstruction has not been described previously. Endoscopic management of gastric remnant bleed has been challenging due to difficulty accessing the excluded stomach. Traditionally, this necessitates surgical intervention. Recently, however, the adoption of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric intervention provides an alternative approach to management.

CASE SUMMARY

A 65-year-old male with a prior gastric bypass presented with the sudden onset of progressive abdominal distension, nausea, and melena of two days duration. His imaging illustrated a massively distended stomach. A nasogastric tube did not result in drainage of fluid or decompression of his abdomen. His endoscopy revealed a normal-appearing gastro-jejunal anastomosis and confirmed the distended "fluid"-filled gastric remnant. An endoscopic ultrasound-directed gastrogastrostomy was created to decompress the gastric remnant. Two liters of blood was suctioned before a large adherent clot was visualized in the gastric antrum. The patient underwent emergent angiography with embolization of the gastroduodenal artery. He was discharged with a stable hemoglobin level and resolution of symptoms. Healing superficial gastric ulcers were visualized on a follow-up endoscopy. Gastric biopsies were consistent with Helicobacter pylori infection for which the patient was treated, and successful eradication was achieved.

CONCLUSION

This patient benefited from a timely diagnosis and effective therapy of an acute gastric remnant obstruction from a bleeding ulcer with endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric intervention.

Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction

BACKGROUND

At present, the gastric tube is the first choice for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy for various benign and malignant diseases. However, when the stomach is not available, a pedicled jejunum or colon is used to reconstruct the esophagus. The present study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes and quality of life of patients receiving jejunal and colonic conduits.

METHODS

In the present retrospective study, the clinical data of 71 patients with esophageal carcinoma, who received jejunal reconstruction (jejunum group, n = 34) and colonic reconstruction (colon group, n = 37) from 2005 to 2015, were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the colon group, the jejunum group had a lower incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, lesser duration of postoperative drainage, and faster recovery. Furthermore, the scores were better in the jejunum group than in the colon group, in terms of short-term overall quality of life, physical function and social relationships. Moreover, the jejunal group had a significantly lower frequency of pH < 4 simultaneous reflux time > 5 min (N45) and the longest reflux time (LT) at 24 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In esophageal cancer, when gastric tube construction is not feasible, a pedicled jejunum may be preferred over a colonic conduit due to lower incidence of acid reflux, anastomotic leakage and higher postoperative short-term quality of life, and rapid postoperative recovery.

Laparoscopic management of gastric remnant ischemia after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I anastomosis-A case report

INTRODUCTION

Gastric remnant ischemia after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) in gastric cancer patients is a very rare but life-threatening condition, especially when accompanied by a splenic infarction or unplanned splenectomy.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 72-year-old male with no comorbid diseases was diagnosed with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the lower stomach and underwent LDG with D2 lymph node dissection. However, a splenic artery injury necessitated a splenectomy intra-operatively, and delta anastomosis was performed based on a clinically viable remnant stomach. During the late post-operative period, the patient developed abdominal pain and showed increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers with hemodynamic stability. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed necrotic patches over the distal part of the remnant stomach with normal anastomosis and duodenal mucosa. Progression of the necrosis was noted on follow up EGD performed 15 days post-surgery. Total laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction was performed and the patient recovered uneventfully.

DISCUSSION

Careful dissection of the lymph nodes over the major vessels is essential to avoid complications in gastric cancer patients requiring LDG. Moreover, major complications occurring intra-operatively may necessitate changes in the surgical plan, including re-excision of the remnant stomach or conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Careful evaluation of the clinical findings and close observation with EGD can help detect mucosal demarcation lines and ascertain the perfect timing for intervention in cases with suspected ischemia. Although gastric remnant ischemia requires emergency treatment, laparoscopic management is a feasible option when performed by an expert surgeon.

Gastric remnant perforation due to trocar site herniation after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

A 39-year-old woman was admitted with colicky left upper-quadrant pain, dyspnoea, low-grade fever, tachycardia and a subtle left upper-quadrant tenderness without leucocytosis. Computed tomography revealed a distended gastric remnant due to small-bowel loop herniation at the trocar site. The patient underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy as her general condition worsened. Perforation across the staple line was seen and repaired. The postoperative period was uneventful. As a rare complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, small-bowel obstruction is of great importance because it can lead to gastric remnant perforation if not managed correctly. There have been rare reports of trocar site herniation as a cause of small-bowel obstruction following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Prompt diagnostic laparoscopy should be considered. This is the first case reported in which the excluded stomach was perforated due to trocar site herniation of the small-bowel loop. It should be noted that the tissue around the perforation is fragile and proper tension should be employed when it is repaired. Generally, an omental patch is not encouraged.

The Sleeping Remnant. Effect of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass on Plasma Levels of Gastric Biomarkers in Morbidly Obese Women: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Morpho-functional modifications of the gastric remnant after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) have not been completely defined, due to its inaccessibility for bioptic mapping. The aim of the study is to evaluate such modifications using Gastropanel®, a non-invasive blood test cross-checking four gastric biomarkers, able to provide a snapshot of mucosa conditions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four women undergoing RYGB were prospectively enrolled. Gastropanel® parameters (pepsinogens, Gastrin-17 and immunoglobulins against Helicobacter pylori), biometrical/clinical data were collected preoperatively and at 6-months follow-up.

RESULTS

All parameters showed significant reduction (p < 0.05). Pepsinogen I reduction correlated with BMI percent decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

The exclusion of food transit is responsible for significant drop in gastric output, hardly representing a risk factor in the remnant carcinogenesis, being unexposed to alimentary carcinogenic agents.

A Novel Reconstruction Technique During Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: How I do It

The altered anatomy in patients after bariatric surgery who have undergone a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may pose a technical challenge for surgical removal of the pancreatic head. We treat patients with pancreas cancer with multimodality therapy in a neoadjuvant fashion followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy, the gastric remnant is preserved and used for pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction and subsequently drained by the same jejunal limb used for the hepaticojejunostomy. This method of reconstruction takes advantage of the previous surgically altered anatomy and avoids the morbidity of a gastric remnant resection at the time of PD.

Gastric remnant twist in the immediate post-operative period following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Twist of stomach remnant post sleeve gastrectomy is a rare entity and difficult to diagnose pre-operatively. We are reporting a case of gastric volvulus post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which was managed conservatively. A 38-year-old lady with a body mass index of 54 underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Sleeve gastrectomy was performed over a 32 French bougie using Endo-GIA tri-stapler. On post-operative day 1, patient had nausea and non-bilious vomiting. An upper gastrointestinal gastrografin study on post-operative days 1 and 2 revealed collection of contrast in the fundic area of stomach with poor flow distally, and she vomited gastrograffin immediately post procedure. With the suspicion of a stricture in the mid stomach as the cause, the patient was taken back for a exploratory laparoscopy and intra-operative endoscopy. We found a twist in the gastric tube which was too tight for the endoscope to pass through. This was managed conservatively with a long stent to keep the gastric tube straight and patent. The stent was discontinued in 7 d and the patient did well. In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy the stomach is converted into a tube and is devoid of its supports. If the staples fired are not aligned appropriately, it can predispose this stomach tube to undergo torsion along its long axis. Such a twist can be avoided by properly aligning the staples and by placing tacking sutures to the omentum and new stomach tube. This twist is a functional obstruction rather than a stricture; thus, it can be managed by endoscopy and stent placement.

Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after distal gastrectomy

We report the use of gastric remnant for esophageal substitution after distal gastrectomy in a 53-year-old man with esophageal cancer. This patient had a 4-month history of progressive dysphagia for solid food. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a 7.0 cm bulge tumor in the middle-lower esophagus, wherein the upper margin was located 28 cm from the dental arcade. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed wall thickening in the middle-lower esophagus. In this case, radical en bloc esophagectomy with a two-field lymph node dissection was performed in the upper abdomen and mediastinum via a posterolateral right thoracotomy through the fifth intercostal space. Esophagogastric anastomosis was performed mechanically in the apex of the chest using a circular stapler. The gastric remnant was used for reconstruction of the esophago-gastrostomy and placed in the right thoracic cavity. The patient was discharged on the 12th postoperative day without complications. The gastric remnant may be used for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer as a substitute organ after distal gastrectomy.

Esophageal reconstruction with remnant stomach: A case report and review of literature

The number of patients developing esophageal cancer after gastrectomy has increased. However, gastric remnant is very rarely used for reconstruction in esophageal cancer surgery because of the risk of anastomotic leakage resulting from insufficient blood flow. We present a case of esophageal cancer using gastric remnant for esophageal substitution after distal gastrectomy in a 57-year-old man who presented with a 1-month history of mild dysphagia and a background history of alcohol abuse. Gastroscopy showed a 1.2 cm × 1.0 cm bulge tumor of the lower third esophagus with the upper margin located 39 cm from the dental arcade. Computed tomography of the chest showed lower third esophageal wall thickening. The patient underwent en bloc radical esophagectomy with a two-field lymph node dissection of the upper abdomen and mediastinum via a left-sided posterolateral thoracotomy through the seventh intercostal space. The upper end of the esophagus was resected 5 cm above the tumor. The gastric remnant was used for reconstruction of the esophago-gastrostomy and placed in the left thoracic cavity. The patient started a liquid diet on postoperative day 8 and was discharged on the 10^th postoperative day without complications. In this report, we demonstrate that the gastric remnant may be used for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer as a substitute organ after distal gastrectomy.