Impact of a multimodal intervention on compliance with hand hygiene among health care workers of a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hand hygiene (HH) is the simplest and most effective measure for the prevention of infection related to healthcare. Despite this, compliance in healthcare professionals continues to be suboptimal. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an expanded World Health Organization (WHO) multimodal strategy on HH compliance in healthcare personnel.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A quasi-experimental before-after study was designed, carrying out the expanded WHO multimodal strategy in 2018, aimed at professionals in a tertiary hospital. In this strategy, apart from applying the 5 pillars of the WHO, a video was made, the administration of the WHO perceptions questionnaire and an incentive to the service/unit with better compliance, adding to the training a modality of practical workshops. The compliance percentages for 2017 and 2018 were compared.

RESULTS

In 2017, 1056 opportunities were observed, registering 631 HH actions, with global compliance of 60% (95% CI 56.7-62.7). In 2018, with 1481 opportunities observed and 1111 HH actions, compliance was 75% (95% CI 72.7-77.2) (P<.001). This compliance increased in all professional categories and in all indications.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of an expanded multimodal strategy has a positive impact on HH compliance. Strategies should be directed to the categories with the worst compliance and continuously over time.

Adherence to hand hygiene at five moments and specific protection in a tertiary care hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, adherence to hygiene measures is an objective aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate adherence to hand hygiene and protection measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study on health personnel handwashing at the five moments recommended by the World Health Organization, as well as on the use of specific personal protective equipment.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen hand hygiene opportunities were observed in health personnel. Hand washing was observed in 40 (34 %) and omission in 76 (65 %). Adherence to the use of face shield was observed in five (4 %), and lack of adherence in 112 (96%). Adherence to the use of face mask was observed in 65 nursing professionals (87 %), with appropriate use of the mask in 56 of them (60 %) and use of face shield in one (1 %).

CONCLUSION

Health personnel showed low proportions of adherence to hand hygiene and use of equipment for specific protection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

[Discussion groups as an approach to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices of hand hygiene among the adult intensive care unit professionals from a referral hospital]

OBJECTIVES

The adherence to hand hygiene practices among the adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) professionals in this hospital has not improved substantially in the last years, regardless of the theoretical training sessions conducted. A study was made of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the ICU personnel in this field.

METHODS

Several small discussion groups with ICU staff organised by preventive medicine professionals were scheduled in March 2018. Semi-structured questions on hand hygiene and use of gloves were included. The points discussed were listed into strengths and weaknesses. Knowledge was then assessed using an anonymous questionnaire, after the sessions.

RESULTS

Thirteen 60-minute sessions were carried out with 157 participants from all professional categories (82% from ICU, median=11 participants / session). The majority perceived hand hygiene as a priority issue of personal responsibility for patient safety. They identified factors that limit their ability to improve their adherence. Certain habits have more to do with personal preferences than with theoretical knowledge or technical indications.

CONCLUSIONS

The discussion groups have helped to make a diagnosis of the situation that will be useful to strengthen those areas of improvement that have been identified. If we aim for a cultural change, and eliminate incorrect habits, it seems more useful to carry out adequate continuing education as part of the daily routine of professionals.

[Perceptions of intensive care professionals about hand hygiene compared with observational studies]

OBJETIVE

To identify perceptions and knowledge about the adherence to hand hygiene of the healthcare staff of an intensive care unit, correlating them with compliance data on adherence to hand hygiene through observational studies MATERIAL AND METHOD: A quantitative methodology has been combined, based on the completion of a personal survey, and a qualitative methodology based on direct observation. Units of Intensive Care of Adults (A-ICU) and Pediatrics (P-ICU) of a tertiary hospital. There were 187 health professionals. Personal and work data of the professionals were collected, as well as questions related to their knowledge and perceptions about the hand hygiene.

RESULTS

Those 187 professionals, 75,9% from A-ICU, represented more than 80% of the study population, and 91.4% had received previous training on hand hygiene. Regarding knowledge, 35% of the A-ICU professionals and almost 50% from the P-ICU consider that hand washing is more effective than hand friction with alcohol-based solutions for the elimination of microorganisms. They have a better perception that they correctly perform the hand washing (89.32% ICU-P and 82.93% ICU-A), than when we compare them to the adherence rates obtained by direct observation (ICU-P 73.8% and ICU-A 51.4%, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having previous training on hand hygiene, they have incomplete knowledge and, although they overestimate the problem of the healthcare-associated infections, they have a perception that does not fit with reality.

Antiseptic measures during the insertion and manipulation of vascular catheters

Several measures related to asepsis for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection have been proposed. The aseptic measures recommended by scientific societies include hand hygiene of the person who is inserting or manipulating the catheter; maximum sterile barrier precautions during catheter insertion; disinfection of catheter hubs; the use of needle-less connectors and injection ports; the avoidance of antibiotic ointments (except in hemodialysis catheters); change the dressing if it is soiled, loose or damp; and aseptic technique during dressing changes. Other measures only recommended by the most recently published guides (possibly due to the publication of recent studies reporting their beneficial effects) are the use of antimicrobial-impregnated dressings, changing transparent dressings every 7 days, and bathing of the patient with chlorhexidine. This article is part of a supplement entitled "Antisepsis in the critical patient", which is sponsored by Becton Dickinson.

[Efecto de un Plan de Mejora de Calidad y Seguridad Clínica en la incidencia de infección de sitio quirúrgico en apendicectomía. Estudio cuasi-experimental]

Objetivo

Las infecciones de sitio quirúrgico se pueden evitar y los programas de control basados en paquetes de medidas preventivas son eficaces para reducir su incidencia. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de un Plan de Mejora de Calidad y Seguridad Clínica del paciente intervenido de apendicectomía en la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico.

Método

Se realizó un estudio cuasi-experimental con análisis antes y después de la introducción de un Plan de Calidad y Seguridad Clínica. Se incluyeron pacientes intervenidos de apendicectomía. Se estudió la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico durante los 30 días posteriores a la cirugía (periodo máximo de incubación de infección quirúrgica). Se evaluó el efecto de la intervención con la odds ratio (OR) ajustada con un modelo de regresión logística.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 606 pacientes, 267 en el periodo 2009-2010 (antes del plan) y 339 durante 2012-2013 (después del plan). La incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico descendió después del plan del 6 al 5.6% (OR: 0.72; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0.33-1.56; p = 0.839). Hubo mayor cumplimiento de la profilaxis antibiótica, de la preparación prequirúrgica y de la adherencia a la higiene de manos tras la introducción de las medidas.

Conclusiones

Aunque la reducción de la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico no presentó diferencias estadísticamente significativas tras las medidas adoptadas, se ha conseguido mejorar la administración de la profilaxis antibiótica, la adherencia a la higiene de manos y la preparación prequirúrgica.

Objective

Surgical site infections can be prevented. Control programs based on care bundle have proven to be effective in reducing its incidence. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a Plan for Quality Improvement and Clinical Safety in preventing the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing appendectomy.

Method

A quasi-experimental study was designed for analysis before and after the introduction of a Plan for Quality and Clinical Safety. Patients undergoing appendectomy were included. The incidence of surgical site infection was studied within 30 days from the time of surgery (maximum incubation period of surgical site infection). The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated using the odds ratio (OR) adjusted with a logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 606 patients were included, of which 267 were operated in the period 2009-2010 (before the plan) and 339 in 2012-2013 (after the plan). The incidence of surgical site ­infection decreased after the plan from 6 to 5.6% (OR: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.56; p = 0.839). There was greater compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis, preoperative preparation and adherence to hand hygiene after the introduction of the measures.

Conclusions

Although the reduction in the incidence of surgical site infection after the measures adopted did not show statistical significant differences, important progress has been made in the compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis, adherence to hand hygiene and in the preoperative preparation.

[A multimodal strategy to improve adherence to hand hygiene in a university hospital]

OBJECTIVE

Within the framework of the PaSQ (Patient Safety and Quality care) Project, this hospital decided to implement a multifaceted hospital-wide Hand Hygiene (HH) intervention based on a multimodal WHO approach over one year, focusing on achieving a sustained change in HH cultural change in this hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Setting: University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander (Spain), a tertiary hospital with 900 beds. Intervention period: 2014. An action plan was developed that included the implementation of activities in each component of the 5-step multimodal intervention. An observation/feedback methodology was used that included the provision of performance and results feedback to the staff. A 3/3 strategy (non-blinded direct observation audits performed during 3 randomised days every 3 weeks with pro-active corrective actions at the end of each observation period). HH compliance, alcohol-based hand-rub (ABHR) consumption, and rate of MRSA infection, were monitored during the intervention.

RESULTS

Hospital ABHR consumption increased during the study period: from 17.5 to 19.7mL/patient-days. In the intervention units, this consumption was 24.8mL pre-intervention, 42.5mL during the intervention, and 30.4mL two months post-intervention. There were 137 evaluation periods in 30 different days, in which a total of 737 health-care workers were observed and 1,870 HH opportunities. HH compliance was 54.5%, ranging between 44.8% and 69.9%. The incidence of MRSA infection decreased during the intervention in the selected units, from 13.2 infections per 10,000 patient-days pre-intervention to 5.7 three months post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our HH strategy, supported by a 3/3 strategy increased alcohol-based hand-rub consumption and compliance. A reduction in MRSA infections was observed.

[Influence of promotional material on hand hygiene in the safety culture of a tertiary hospital]

In order to increase safety culture about hand hygiene by means of messages and reminders about its importance in preventing nosocomial infections, we developed a new set of materials in the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil of Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, constitued by two centres with 450 beds each and acredited for medical internal residents training. We hired a well-known caricaturist, who adapted the messages to the local way of speaking, by using characters that used to appear in his artwork in the local newspaper. Also, we continued to work with other graphic design professionals. We monitored adherence and consumption of products for hand rubbing. We noted an increase in both indicators in the following months after the implementation of this strategy. Moreover, we revised the infrastructures for hand hygiene, and were able to demonstrate improvements in most of the patient care areas. The material was well accepted by professionals, patients and visitors. No other interventions were made, so we think improvements can be attributable to this strategy in our setting.

[Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in medical students: importance in nosocomial transmission]

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is the main pathogen causing nosocomial infections. Health professionals, including medical students, could be a source of transmission. The aims of the study were to determine the rate of nasal carriage of S.aureus susceptible and resistant to methicillin (MRSA) and evaluate the knowledge and adherence that students had about hand hygiene.

METHODS

The study included medical students attached to the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain). We collected samples from both nasal vestibules, and the antimicrobial susceptibility was determined on all isolates. Data collection was performed using a self-administered questionnaire that included risk factors for colonization, hygiene habits and knowledge of hand hygiene protocols.

RESULTS

Of the 140 students included, 55 (39.3%) were colonized by S.aureus, and 3 (2,1%) by MRSA. The exposure to antibiotics in the last 3 months was lower in colonized students (12.3% vs. 25.9%, P=.03). Self-assessment showed that 56.4% of students almost never washed their hands before to attending to the first patient, and only 38.6% always washed after examining patients. More than a third (35.7%) ignored the hand hygiene protocol, and 38.6% had not received specific formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students should be included in hospital infection control programs. Hand hygiene training should be given to students before they begin their practices in the hospital.