Protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention-Impella 5.0 as a single-access technique: a case report

Background

Patients requiring coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction, with decompensated heart failure and multiple co-morbidities, present a challenging clinical scenario. Addressing such high-risk cases has been a marked increase in the simultaneous support using microaxial flow pump devices, providing a crucial haemodynamic support during procedures.

Case summary

We report the case of a 58-year-old man, with a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the context of a peripheral vascular surgery. Echocardiography revealed severely reduced left ventricular function and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated transmural scars in all but left anterior descending artery area. The patient was of extreme high surgical risk due to the multiple co-morbidities, acute decompensation heart failure, and peripheral artery disease, and, therefore, the heart team preferred protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over coronary artery bypass graft for revascularization. The peripheral artery disease included severely calcified ascending aorta, occlusions of both femoral arteries, the left subclavian artery, and the right radial artery. Taken together, the heart team agreed on a hybrid approach with surgical implantation of Impella 5.0 via the left subclavian artery, by a single-access technique. Following the intervention procedure, haemostasis of the vascular prosthesis was achieved by an angio-seal technique without complications. The patient recovered satisfactorily, with improved left ventricular function, and discharged 10 days post-procedure.

Discussion

The single-access high-risk PCI technique offers a standardized approach for microaxial flow pump devices such as Impella 5.0 and PCI. The subclavian artery as a single-access route for high-risk PCI has demonstrated safety and efficacy.

Temporary circulatory support with surgically implanted microaxial pumps in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock following coronary artery bypass surgery

Objectives

Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may develop postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. In these cases, implantation of an Impella 5.0 or 5.5 microaxial pump offers full hemodynamic support while simultaneously unloading of the left ventricle.

Methods

Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data of all patients receiving postoperative support with an Impella 5.0 or 5.5 after CABG surgery between September 2017 and October 2022 were retrospectively collected. Cohort built-up was performed according to the timing of Impella implantation, either simultaneous during CABG surgery or delayed.

Results

A total of n = 42 patients received postoperative Impella support, of whom 27 patients underwent simultaneous Impella implantation during CABG surgery and 15 patients underwent delayed Impella therapy. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was similarly low in both groups (26.7 ± 0.7% vs 24.8 ± 11.3%; P = .32). In the delayed cohort, Impella implantation was performed after a median of 1 (1; 2) days after CABG surgery. Survival after 30 days (75.6% vs 47.6%, P = .04) and 1 year (69.4% vs 29.8%, P = .03) was better in the cohort receiving simultaneous Impella implantation.

Conclusions

The combined advantages of hemodynamic support and LV unloading with microaxial pumps may lead to a favorable survival in patients with left ventricular failure following CABG surgery. Early implantation during the initial surgery shows a trend toward a more favorable survival as compared with patients receiving delayed support.

Tissue plasminogen activator for axillary Impella 5.0 with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as a treatment of choice for acute Impella thrombosis: a case report

Background

Patients with cardiogenic shock requiring temporary support with percutaneous ventricular assist device, such as Impella (Abiomed, Inc.), can develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) which requires use of alternative purge solution anticoagulation. There are limited recommendations on use of anticoagulation other than standard Unfractionated Heparin in 5% dextrose solution.

Case summary

This case describes 69-year-old female who presented with symptoms of decompensated systolic heart failure and was found to be in cardiogenic shock and despite use of inotropes and vasopressors maintained low systolic blood pressure and low mixed venous oxygen saturation which lead to use of axillary Impella 5.0 (Abiomed, Inc.) who developed HIT. Purge solution anticoagulation was switched to Argatroban, but due to increased motor pressures, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was successfully used to maintain proper motor pressures. Ultimately, patient was transferred to an outside facility for a transplant evaluation.

Discussion

This case demonstrates successful and safe use of tPA as an alternative purge solution although more data needed to support this finding.

Increased risk of purge system malfunction after Impella 5.0 replacement: a case series

The Impella 5.0 is an axial-flow percutaneous ventricular assist device used in patients with cardiogenic shock. Although the recommended period of use is 10 days or less, weaning can be delayed because of ongoing hemodynamic instability. In clinical practice, this device sometimes malfunctions during long-term management with heparin and must be replaced; however, the relationship between the duration of support with the initial and replacement Impella 5.0 and the changes in value of the purge system has not been fully elucidated. From July 2018 to May 2021, Impella 5.0 was implanted and used for more than 10 days in 11 patients at our institution. Four patients required Impella replacement because of device malfunction and the second Impella had purge system malfunction in all cases. The second Impella was used for a significantly shorter time than the first Impella (p = 0016). We calculated the ratio of purge pressure to purge flow rate and found that the ratio exceeded 50 mm Hg/mL/h in all cases with purge system malfunction. In conclusion, it is important to construct a treatment strategy considering the duration of use, because the risk of purge system malfunction is high after replaced Impella 5.0.

Impella5.0 "ILIPELLA" Approach for a Fulminant Myocarditis Patient With a Small Peripheral Artery

Cardiogenic shock with fulminant myocarditis is a life-threatening diagnosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with an Impella for left ventricle unloading is often required to maintain the haemodynamics. However, the small peripheral vascularity in small-bodied patients interrupts the upgrade from ECMO to Impella5.0, which usually requires grafting to a femoral artery or subclavian artery of at least 7 mm in size. This report outlines the external iliac artery approach, named the "ILIPELLA" technique, which uses a reconstructed external iliac artery to introduce Impella5.0 in patients with small peripheral vascularity.

Impella 5.0 is associated with a reduction in vasoactive support and improves hemodynamics in cardiogenic shock: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) often requires the use of vasopressors and inotropic agents, which are associated with an increase in mortality. Data on change in vasopressor and inotrope requirements post Impella 5.0 placement is scarce. Thus, we aimed to study the ability of Impella 5.0 to reduce these requirements.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with CS receiving Impella 5.0 was performed. Vasopressor-Inotrope Score (VIS) and a Modified Catecholamine Equivalent score (MCES) was calculated prior to and up to 72 h post-Impella implantation. Primary outcome was change in MCES from baseline to 48-h post implantation and secondary outcomes included change in VIS, changes in MCES according to SCAI Stage and to underlying etiology, and freedom from mortality at 30-days.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with median age of 61 (48, 67) years were included. Impella 5.0 was associated with significant reduction in MCES from baseline [9.7 (5.3, 17)] to 48 h [5.7 (3.8, 7.5), p = 0.001]. VIS was also significantly reduced from baseline [8.3 (3.8, 19.9)] to 48 h [5.0 (2.5, 8), p = 0.003]. MCES at 48 h was significantly reduced in patients with SCAI Stage E versus Stage C (p = 0.026) and with acute myocardial infarction versus acute decompensated heart (p = 0.003). Thirty-day survival was 0% in patients that had a baseline MCES ⩾ 10 without a reduction in MCES of at least 5 at 24 h.

CONCLUSION

Impella 5.0 is associated with a significant reduction in MCES and VIS scores in patients presenting with CS with 30-day survival being dependent on MCES.

Efficacy and safety of Impella 5.0 in cardiogenic shock: an updated systematic review

Aim: The impact on safety and efficacy outcomes of Impella 5.0 in cardiogenic shock (CS) has not been systematically assessed. Materials & methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020164680) to critically appraise available evidence on Impella 5.0 comparative safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Results: Of 244 retrieved citations, 17 original articles met the a priori defined inclusion criteria. All included studies had a retrospective study design and, overall, reported on, respectively, 52 and 67 different safety and efficacy/effectiveness outcomes. Thirty-day survival rates ranged from 40 to 94%, myocardial recovery from 18 to 93%. Conclusion: Impella 5.0 provides a full cardiac support, it is associated with a lower rate of vascular complications, it represents a valuable bridge-to-decision and allows for resolution of intercurrent clinical conditions. As available data suggest Impella 5.0 good performance in CS of various etiologies, more solid evidence will come from much-needed large-scale all-comer registries and prospective multicenter randomized trials.

Coronary artery bypass grafting under sole Impella 5.0 support for patients with severely depressed left ventricular function

Selection of the ideal surgical procedure for coronary revascularization in patients with severe cardiac dysfunction at times may represent a challenge. In recent years, with the advent of surgical large microaxial pumps, e.g., Impella 5.0 (Abiomed Inc., Boston, USA), specific support and effective unloading of the left ventricle has become available. In the interventional field, good results have been achieved with smaller microaxial pumps in the setting of so-called protected percutaneous coronary intervention. In this study, we would like to share our early experience with surgical coronary revascularization under the sole support of Impella 5.0, omitting the use of heart–lung machine in three cases of severe cardiac dysfunction due to complex ischemic heart disease. Effective circulatory support intraoperatively and postoperatively speaks in favor of this technique in selected patients.

Edge-to-edge mitral repair for iatrogenic chordal rupture related to Impella 5.0

Iatrogenic chordal rupture with severe mitral regurgitation is a rare but serious complication associated with the use of Impella device. We present a case of a 47-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy who required insertion of an Impella 5.0 device. During Impella support, he developed acute pulmonary edema secondary to newly diagnosed posterior mitral valve chordal rupture and subsequent severe mitral regurgitation. He underwent implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device with concomitant edge-to-edge mitral valve repair through the apex.

Electrical Storm Ablation in a Patient in Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Impella 5.0

Intra-axial pumps are increasingly used to support cardiogenic shock. The occurrence of electrical storms in this setting is a rising issue, and data remain scarce about optimal management. We report the feasibility of ventricular tachycardia ablation in the presence of a recent surgically inserted Impella 5.0 device (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts). (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Insertion technique for the Impella 5.0 heart pump in the COVID-19 era

We describe the insertion of the Impella 5.0, a peripherally placed mechanical cardiovascular microaxial pump, in a patient with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. The Impella is a 7 Fr device capable of achieving a flow of 4.0-5.0 L/min; its use necessitates an open arterial cut-down. A subclavicular incision is used to access the right or left axillary artery. A 10-mm tube graft is anastomosed to the artery through which the Impella 5.0 is inserted. The device traverses the tube graft and is advanced via the aorta, across the aortic valve, to its final position (inflow toward the ventricular apex and outflow above the aorta). The device may remain in situ for 10 days until recovery or until further supports are instituted. Our goal is to demonstrate the insertion of the Impella 5.0 device in a patient with cardiogenic shock whose situation was further complicated by coronavirus disease 2019.

Outcomes of heart transplantation in patients bridged with Impella 5.0: Comparison with native chest transplanted patients without preoperative mechanical circulatory support

The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) has become an important adjunct treatment modality in bridging patients with end-stage heart failure to recovery or orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx). We compared the outcome of patients directly bridged to HTx with the Impella 5.0 versus patients without mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Patients with no previous sternotomy or MCS, who were transplanted between September 2014 and March 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis. Impella 5.0 was implanted using surgical access and transesophageal echocardiography guidance. Forty-two out of 155 transplanted patients fulfilled the insertion criteria. Eight (19%) were bridged with Impella 5.0 to HTx. Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. There were no significant differences in survival between the groups at 30-day (94% no MCS vs. 87.5% Impella group, P = .47) or 6 months (94% vs. 87.5%, P = .51). Patients on Impella 5.0 showed a significant recovery of hemodynamic parameters and end-organ function. Average duration of support to HTx was 16 ± 17 days. Impella 5.0, when used in suitable patients in a timely fashion can be a good strategy for bridging patients to HTx. The axillary approach allows for early extubation and mobilization. Outcomes of patients bridged to HTx with Impella 5.0 in acute cardiogenic shock are comparable to those of patients with no MCS.

Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery

BACKGROUND

Mechanical circulatory support is a common practice nowadays in the management of patients after cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction. The single or combined use of one or more devices for mechanical support depends not only on the advantage or disadvantage of these devices but also on the timing of use of these devices before the development of multi organ failure. In our case we used more than one tool for mechanical circulatory support during the prolonged and complicated course of our patient with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock after coronary artery bypass surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the combined use of Impella 5.0 and veno- pulmonary extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (VP-ECMO) for biventricular failure in a 52 years-old man. He presented with cardiogenic shock after inferior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction. After emergency coronary artery bypass surgery and failure to wean from extracorporeal circulation we employed V-P ECMO and consecutively Impella 5.0 to manage the primarily failing right and secondarily failing left ventricles. He remained hemodynamically stable on both Impella 5.0 and VP-ECMO until Heart Mate II left ventricular assist device implantation on the 14^th postoperative day. Right sided support was weaned on 66^th postoperative day. The patient remained in the intensive care unit for 77 days. During his prolonged stay, he underwent renal replacement therapy and tracheostomy with complete recovery. Six months later, he was successfully heart transplanted and has completed three and half years of unremarkable follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of VP ECMO and Impella 5.0 is effective in the management of postcardiotomy biventricular failure as a bridge for further mechanical support or heart transplantation.