1
|
Zheng C, Shaposhnikov S, Collins A, Brunborg G, Oancea F, Van Schooten FJ, Godschalk R. Comparison of comet-based approaches to assess base excision repair. Arch Toxicol 2023; 97:2273-2281. [PMID: 37349528 PMCID: PMC10322757 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03543-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
DNA repair plays an essential role in maintaining genomic stability, and can be assessed by various comet assay-based approaches, including the cellular repair assay and the in vitro repair assay. In the cellular repair assay, cells are challenged with a DNA-damaging compound and DNA damage removal over time is assessed. In the in vitro repair assay, an early step in the repair process is assessed as the ability of a cellular extract to recognize and incise damaged DNA in substrate nucleoids from cells treated with a DNA-damaging compound. Our direct comparison of both assays in eight cell lines and human peripheral blood lymphocytes indicated no significant relationship between these DNA repair assays (R2 = 0.084, P = 0.52). The DNA incision activity of test cells measured with the in vitro repair assay correlated with the background level of DNA damage in the untreated test cells (R2 = 0.621, P = 0.012). When extracts were prepared from cells exposed to DNA-damaging agents (10 mM KBrO3 or 1 µM Ro 19-8022 plus light), the incision activity was significantly increased, which is in line with the notion that base excision repair is inducible. The data presented suggest that the two assays do not measure the same endpoint of DNA repair and should be considered as complementary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Congying Zheng
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Norgenotech AS, 64/66, 0379, Ullernchassern, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo Cancer Cluster, 64/66, 0379, Ullernchausseen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sergey Shaposhnikov
- Norgenotech AS, 64/66, 0379, Ullernchassern, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo Cancer Cluster, 64/66, 0379, Ullernchausseen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrew Collins
- Norgenotech AS, 64/66, 0379, Ullernchassern, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Florin Oancea
- National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry, Splaiul Independenței 202, București, Romania
| | - Frederik-Jan Van Schooten
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Roger Godschalk
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kania DM, Ginger ML, Allinson SL. Analysis of Base Excision and Single-Strand Break Repair Activities in Trypanosomatid Extracts. Methods Mol Biol 2020; 2116:353-64. [PMID: 32221931 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0294-2_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Cellular DNA is inherently unstable, subject to both spontaneous hydrolysis and attack by a range of exogenous and endogenous chemicals as well as physical agents such as ionizing and ultraviolet radiation. For parasitic protists, where an inoculum of infectious parasites is typically small and natural infections are often chronic with low parasitemia, they are also vulnerable to DNA damaging agents arising from innate immune defenses. The majority of DNA damage consists of relatively minor changes to the primary structure of the DNA, such as base deamination, oxidation, or alkylation and scission of the phosphodiester backbone. Yet these small changes can have serious consequences, often being mutagenic or cytotoxic. Cells have therefore evolved efficient mechanisms to repair such damage, with base excision and single strand break repair playing the primary role here. In this chapter we describe a method for analyzing the activity from cell extracts of various enzymes involved in the base excision and single strand break repair pathways of trypanosomatid parasites.
Collapse
|