Comparable results of superior vs antero-inferior plating for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Clavicle fractures represent up to 10 % of all fractures, affecting mainly a young population. Open reduction and internal plate fixation provide good results, but evidence on the best plate positioning is still unclear. Aim of this retrospective study was to compare superior and antero-inferior plating positioning in the surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

104 patients aged > 18 years, treated surgically with plate fixation (51 superior, 53 antero-inferior) for a midshaft clavicle fracture from January 2010 to April 2021 were included. At the time of the visit, mean follow-up time was 6.6 ± 2.6 years. Shoulder function was evaluated with the use of Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Return to sport, aesthetic satisfaction, operative time, radiological outcomes, rate of implant removal, and overall patient satisfaction were documented as well.

RESULTS

Mean CMS was 94.1 ± 10.0 points in the superior plating group and 93.4 ± 11.6 points in the antero-inferior plating group. DASH score: 4.6 ± 11.0 superior, 5.1 ± 10.5 antero-inferior. Return to sport: 8.2 ± 2.9 superior, 8.2 ± 3.0 antero-inferior. Aesthetic satisfaction: 8.9 ± 1.6 superior, 8.8 ± 2.1 antero-inferior. Overall satisfaction: 9.1 ± 1.5 superior, 8.9 ± 1.7 antero-inferior. The comparison between groups showed no statistically significant differences (p = n.s.) for all outcome measures. Operative time: 101.6 ± 27.3 min superior, 113.0 ± 31.6 min antero-inferior (p = 0.05). Radiological follow-up documented one non-union and one mal-union in the antero-inferior plating group. Overall, 63 patients underwent plate removal: 58.8 % in the superior plating group and 62.3 % in the antero-inferior plating group (p = n.s.). Main reason for plate removal was pain/discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Both superior and antero-inferior plating provided excellent clinical, functional, and radiological results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, without significant differences between groups. The superior plating group showed a statistically shorter operative time. High rate of re-interventions with implant removal was documented in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The emergency medicine management of clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND

Clavicle fractures are common. An emergency physician needs to understand the diagnostic classifications of clavicle fractures, have a plan for immobilization, identify associated injuries, understand the difference between treating pediatric and adult patients, and have an approach to multimodal pain control. It is also important to understand when expert orthopedic consultation or referral is indicated.

OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW

To provide an evidence-based review of clavicle fracture management in the emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Clavicle fractures account for up to 4% of all fractures evaluated in the emergency department. They can be separated into midshaft, distal, and proximal fractures. They are also classified in terms of their degree of displacement, comminution and shortening. Emergent referral is indicated for open fractures, posteriorly displaced proximal fractures, and those with emergent associated injuries. Urgent referral is warranted for fractures with greater than 100% displacement, fractures with >2 cm of shortening, comminuted fractures, unstable distal fractures, and floating shoulder. Nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures with no instability or associated neurovascular injury are managed non-operatively with a sling. Pediatric fractures are generally managed conservatively, with adolescents older than 9 years-old for girls and 12 years-old for boys being treated using algorithms that are similar to adults.

CONCLUSIONS

When encountering a patient with a clavicle fracture in the emergency department the fracture pattern will help determine whether emergent consultation or urgent referral is indicated. Most patients can be discharged safely with sling immobilization and appropriate outpatient follow-up.

Surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures with precontoured plates in adolescents

BACKGROUND

The use of plate fixation to treat displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adults reduces complications and residual shoulder disability. New features of the precontoured locking plates have been shown to reduce the need for hardware removal in adults. There is a lack of studies evaluating surgical fixation of displaced clavicular fractures with precontoured plates in adolescents. We evaluate outcomes and complications of adolescents with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated with precontoured locking plates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

40 adolescents with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures were surgically treated from January 2010 to May 2017. Outcomes were evaluated using the Constant score, the 11- item version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and radiographs, and a visual analog scale. Return-to-sport rate, level achieved, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 50 months (18 - 108 months). Constant, Quick-DASH, and visual analog scale scores were 95.6, 2.8 and 0.5 points, respectively. 100% of adolescents returned to sports at the same level they had before injury. Mean time to return was 69 days and 95% of patients were able to return before 12 weeks. Complication rate was 12.5%, 3 patients (7.5%) required hardware removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated with precontoured locking plates exhibited satisfactory outcomes and low complication rate. Compared to other reports, this study had lower rates, anatomic plates might reduce hardware-related complications.

Risk factors for refracture after plate removal for midshaft clavicle fracture after bone union

Background

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws is one of the treatment options for clavicle fractures. However, an additional operation for implant removal after union of the fracture is commonly performed due to a high incidence of hardware irritation. Despite union of the fracture, a subsequent refracture might occur after removal of the implant which requires additional surgeries for fixation. This study aims to determine the risk factors associated with refracture of the clavicle after hardware removal.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 278 patients that were diagnosed with a midshaft clavicle fracture (male 190; female 88) that had (1) undergone ORIF of the clavicle with plates and (2) received a second operation for removal of hardware after solid union of the fracture between 2010 and 2017. Their mean age was 40.1 ± 15.1 years, and mean interval from fixation to plate removal was 12.5 ± 7.5 months. The patients were then divided into two groups based on the presence of refracture (n = 20) or without refracture (n = 258). We analyzed patient demographics, interval between fixation and implant removal, fracture classification (AO/OTA, Robinson), fixation device, whether wires or interfragmentary screws were used, clavicular length, and bone diameter at the fracture site.

Results

The overall refracture rate was 7.2%, and the mean interval between plate removal and refracture was 23.9 days. A multivariate analysis showed that female (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.74; 95% CI 1.6–14.1) and body mass index [BMI] (for every 1-unit decrease, aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.06–1.48) were risk factors for refracture. In women, BMI was the only risk factor. The optimal BMI cutoff value was 22.73. In a female patient with a lower BMI, the refracture rate was 29.8%.

Conclusions

There are no significant radiographic parameters associated with refracture. Routine plate removal in a female patient with a low BMI after bony union of a midshaft clavicle fracture is not recommended because of a high refracture rate.

Is shortening of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures associated with inferior clinical outcomes following nonoperative management? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is controversial. Nonoperative treatment can lead to shortening, a risk factor for nonunion and poor functional outcomes. These inferior results have resulted in authors recommending surgical fixation for fractures with significant shortening. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the effect of fracture shortening on shoulder function and nonunion rates in nonoperatively managed displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted on February 16, 2018, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies with midshaft clavicle fractures treated nonoperatively reporting an evaluation of the degree of clavicle shortening and either shoulder function or nonunion were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 16 studies eligible for inclusion, comprising 4 randomized controlled trials and 12 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies. Of the 12 case series, 11 failed to demonstrate any correlation between shortening and shoulder outcome scores. Of the 4 randomized controlled trials, 3 reported no significant association between fracture shortening and shoulder outcome scores. The studies also failed to demonstrate a significant association between nonunion and the presence of clavicle shortening.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant association between fracture shortening and nonunion rates or shoulder outcome scores in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures managed nonoperatively.

The first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate for clavicular midshaft fractures

BACKGROUND

Pre-contoured locking plates were recently introduced in the management of clavicular midshaft fractures. These plates may offer advantages such as no necessity for intraoperative bending and reduced plate irritation. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical and radiographical outcome of the first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, 100 consecutive patients (16 female, 84 male) with a median age of 40 years (range 15-82) who underwent surgery for clavicular midshaft fractures with a VariAx locking plate (Stryker Corporation Kalmazoo, MI, USA) between March 2012 and January 2016 were included. Postoperative follow-up was performed until union was clinically and radiographically achieved. Fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative need for contouring the plate, further surgery such as revision or hardware removal and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

One-hundred patients with a dislocated midshaft clavicular fracture with a mean follow-up of 21.9 months (standard deviation 13.2) were included. Ninety-three patients reported normal shoulder function at latest follow-up. Median surgical time was 75.5 min (range, 35-179). In three patients, intraoperative bending of the plate was necessary. In two patients, plates designed for the other side were implanted. Five patients needed revision surgery: One patient with wound healing problems, one patient with a re-fracture after early (13 months) hardware removal and minor trauma, one patient with postoperative shoulder stiffness and two patients with failed osteosynthesis because of surgical implantation fault. One asymptomatic nonunion without further treatment was observed. In 30 patients, the plate was removed after a mean of 17.5 months (SD 4.2) because of subjective plate discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

With this new pre-contoured locking plate, good to excellent intraoperative fit to the anatomical shape of the clavicle can be achieved. The implant seems to be reliable regarding handling and complications. Clinical and radiological results are comparable to results reported in the literature. Hardware removal rate is comparable to other studies with a pre-contoured plate and lower compared to non-pre-contoured.

Are commercially-available precontoured anatomical clavicle plating systems offering the purported superior optimum fitting to the clavicle? A cadaveric analysis and review of literature

PURPOSE

The indication for operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial. However, if plate fixation is considered, implant prominence and skin irritation are the most common causes for re-operation. Low profile implants as well as closely contouring plates to the individual anatomy may reduce these complications. The aim of this study was to compare the fitting accuracy and implant prominence of 3.5mm pelvic reconstruction plates (PRP) with pre-contoured anatomical clavicle plates (PACP) for midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

Three-dimensional data of the largest, median and smallest male and female clavicle of an existing database of 89 cadaveric clavicles were included for analysis. A three-dimensional model of a commercially available PACP was used for digitally positioning of the plate on the segmented clavicles. Three-dimensional printouts of each clavicle were produced and the 3.5mm reconstruction plates were manually bent and positioned by the senior author. Computed tomography scans and three-dimensional reconstructions were then obtained to digitally compare the fitting accuracy and implant prominence.

RESULTS

Pelvic reconstruction plates offered superior fitting accuracy and lower implant prominence compared to PACP. The largest difference in implant prominence was observed in large sized female clavicles and measured 3.6mm.

CONCLUSION

Both, the less costly PRP plates and commercially available PACP for midshaft fractures of the clavicle demonstrated a clinically acceptable fitting accuracy. The manually bent pelvic-reconstruction plates demonstrated reduced implant prominence with superior fitting. Hypothetically this might contribute to a reduced rate of reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV cadaveric study.

Nonoperative Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults

Clavicle fractures are among the most common skeletal injuries accounting for 2-5% of all adult fractures. Historically, nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures was considered the gold standard of care. Furthermore, nonoperative treatment has been challenged by an increasing popularity and rate of surgical fixations in recent years despite a lack of clear evidence in the current literature. Most fractures are suitable for conservative treatment. There is solid evidence in favour of nonoperative treatment for fractures with a displacement of less than 2cm and remaining contact of the bone fragments. Clear indications for conservative treatment versus surgical fixation of displaced midshaft fractures have not finally been established yet, leaving some questions and problems unanswered. Furthermore, there are no evidence-based recommendations concerning the kind and duration of shoulder immobilisation with no clear advantage for any treatment modality.

Midshaft clavicle fractures treatment: threaded Kirschner wire versus conservative approach

Clavicle fractures are common, accounting for 2.6 to 10% of all fractures. Treatment of these fractures is usually non-surgical. Recent evidence, however, reveals that the final result of non-surgically midshaft clavicular fractures, particularly those with quite large displacements or shortening, is not like that which was previously thought. This study evaluated retrospectively all patients presented with a clavicle fracture at Emergency Department of our Institution, between January 2006 and December 2011. Fractures were classified according to Allman’s radiographic classification system, modified by Nordqvist and Petersson. Patients were distinguished into two groups: one that underwent conservative treatment with a “figure-of-8” orthosis and one that underwent surgery with reduction in fracture and fixation with intramedullary threaded Kirschner wire. Pin removal was performed after 4 weeks of rest in Gilchrist bandage, after clinical and radiographic evaluation demonstrating the bone healing. The QuickDASH score and the Constant Murley Shoulder Score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. The radiographic outcome was evaluated at 1 and 6 months of follow-up. Database review provided a final cohort of 58 patients, with similar demographic features. There was no significant difference in qDASH and CS between the two groups. The results of qDASH and CS evaluated in function of the radiographic outcome show a statistically significant correlation between the worst qDASH and CS results and the grade of malunion in both groups. In particular, we have found unsatisfactory results when final shortening of the clavicle was 20 mm or more. On radiographic evaluation, surgical treatment demonstrated a greater efficacy in reducing initial shortening of the fractured bone; this is in opposition to conservative treatment that results very often in malunion, shortening, anatomic alterations and loss of functionality. The use of intramedullary threaded Kirschner wire for fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures is a safe procedure and is recommended in case of shortening greater than 2 cm in high-function-demand patients.

Complications associated with operative fixation of acute midshaft clavicle fractures

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to review the complication rate and profile associated with surgical fixation of acute midshaft clavicle fracture in a large cohort of patients treated in a level I trauma centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent surgical treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fracture between 2002 and 2010. The study group consisted of 138 fractures (134 patients) and included 107 men (78%) and 31 women (22%); the median age of 35 years (interquartile range (IQR) 24-45). The most common mechanism of injury was a road traffic accident (78%). Sixty percent (n=83) had an injury severity score of ≥15 indicating major trauma. The most common fracture type (75%) was simple or wedge comminuted (2B1) according to the Edinburgh classification. The median interval between the injury and operation was 3 days (IQR 1-6). Plate fixation was performed in 110 fractures (80%) and intramedullary fixation was performed in 28 fractures (20%). There were 85 men and 25 women in the plate fixation group with median age of 35 years (IQR 25-45) There were 22 men and six women in the intramedullary fixation group with median age of 31 years (IQR 24-42 years). Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t test, Mann Whitney test, and Chi square test. Significant P-value was <0.05.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of complication was 14.5% (n=20). The overall nonunion rate was 6%. Postoperative wound infection occurred in 3.6% of cases. The incidence of complication associated with plate fixation was 10% (11 of 110 cases) compared to 32% associated with intramedullary fixation (nine of 28 cases; P=0.003). Thirty-five percent of complications were related to inadequate surgical technique and were potentially avoidable. Symptomatic hardware requiring removal occurred in 23% (n=31) of patients. Symptomatic metalware was more frequent after plate fixation compared to intramedullary fixation (26% vs 7%, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture is associated with a higher incidence of complications. Plate fixation is associated with a higher rate of symptomatic metalware requiring removal compared to intramedullary fixation. Approximately one in three complications may be avoided by attention to adequate surgical technique.

Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear whether all completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures require primary surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to elucidate the radiological and clinical outcomes after conservative treatment, and to identify subgroups at risk of an inferior outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level II trauma center.

PATIENTS

Between 2005 and 2008, 122 patients were conservatively treated for a completely displaced midshaft clavicle fracture of whom 92 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Of these, 59 completed the study after a median of 2.7 years after the fracture (min-max, 1.1-4.9).

INTERVENTION

The patients received the standard treatment administered at our institution at the time: nonsurgically with a sling without physiotherapy. Patients with painful nonunions were subsequently offered surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

At follow-up, the patients' Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the Constant scores were evaluated. Radiographs were taken at follow-up and compared to those taken acutely.

RESULTS

Nonunion was found in 9 of the 59 (15.3%) patients. Twenty-four (24%) patients reported a fair-to-poor DASH score (i.e. >20). Patients with fractures that were vertically displaced by more than 100% (one bone width) were significantly less satisfied than those with fractures vertically displaced at 100% (p = 0.04). Initial shortening of more than 15 mm was not associated with a worse outcome or nonunion. The odds ratio of developing a nonunion increased with age (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

By treating completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures conservatively with a sling and offering plate fixation for eventual painful nonunions, we found a 24% risk of a fair or poor clinical result with a DASH score over 20. A vertical displacement of more than 100 % between the main fragments on the initial radiograph was associated with an inferior clinical outcome in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Plate fixation versus conservative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: Functional outcome and patients' satisfaction during a mean follow-up of 5 years

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present prospective clinical trial was to compare patient-oriented and surgeon-based outcomes after non-operative care with operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Between January 2009 and July 2011, 97 consecutive patients presenting with a midshaft clavicle fracture were prospectively recorded and included in this study. The patients were placed in either of the treatment groups on their own preference. They were then seen in outpatient clinic at two, six and 24 weeks were all endpoints were investigated and motivation of choice of treatment was noted. Study follow-up was continued until Augustus 2014, being the time point that long-term functional outcome was measured through a DASH score by letter.

RESULTS

97 patients were included in the functional outcome analysis. The mean DASH and Constant scores were significant better in the operative (90.9±14.2 and 15.7±17.2) than in the conservative treatment group at six weeks (78.7±17.0 and 24.8±16.7). There was a significant improvement in the Constant (95.9±10.5 versus 94.5±5.9) and DASH scores (8.8±12.0 versus 7.1±10.7) for both groups at 24 weeks but there was no significant difference in functional scores between the groups. Four patients developed a non-union, one patient in the operative and three patients in the conservative group. Overall complications were significantly higher in the operative group (31%) compared to the conservative group (9%) (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in long-term functional outcome between the two treatment groups (5.2±9.8 versus 2.5±4.9 p=0.12). Patient's satisfaction was higher in the operative than in the conservative group (p<0.04).

CONCLUSION

Significant superior outcome scores were seen at six weeks for the operative group. However, at 24 weeks and 5-year follow-up no difference was seen in functional outcome scores for both treatment groups. Therefore, the challenge for the future is to better identify the subgroup of patients who might benefit from primary surgical intervention.

Intramedullary clavicle fixation with single large fragmentary screw

BACKGROUND

The treatment of clavicle fractures has historically been nonoperative, but several studies have recently shown the merits of operative management for specific fractures patterns. We developed a novel technique utilizing a 6.5-mm cannulated screw for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present 15 consecutive patients treated with this technique between 2007 and 2012. All patients were male, and all 15 suffered a traumatic injury involving a fall directly onto the affected side. Mean time from injury to surgery was 12 days (range 3-24 days). Decision for surgery was based on the displacement and shortening of the fracture, either at least 20 mm of shortening or displacement with no bony apposition. After surgery, all patients were placed in an abduction brace for 6 weeks. No motion was allowed for the first 3 weeks, followed by passive shoulder motion below 90° of forward flexion under the supervision of a therapist for the next 3 weeks.

RESULTS

All 15 patients progressed to union at an average of 5.7 months (range 3-12). Three patients had superficial wound infections. Hardware removal was performed in 6 of the 15 patients at an average of 12 months (range 5-24). All patients regained full range of motion and strength in comparison with contralateral extremity.

CONCLUSION

This novel technique limits soft tissue stripping. It has the advantages of using an implant familiar to most orthopedists and available in most hospital settings. We believe this technique is ideally suited for transverse fractures patterns, less than 14 days old, in males greater than 180 cm with clavicles large enough to accommodate a 6.5-mm screw.

Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures: comparison between reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate

Background

To compare the outcomes of reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate (LCP) for the treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures.

Methods

Forty one patients with a clavicle midshaft fracture were treated by internal fixation with a reconstruction plate (19 patients) or reconstruction LCP (22 patients). The clinical and radiological results were evaluated according to the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs.

Results

The mean time to union was 14.6 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared to 13.2 weeks in the reconstruction LCP group (p > 0.05). The mean score to Quick DASH was 33.85 points in the reconstruction plate group compared to 34.81 points in the reconstruction LCP group (p > 0.05). The complications in the reconstruction plate were hypertrophic scarring in 2 cases, painful shoulder in 2 cases, limitation of shoulder motion in 2 cases, and screw loosening in 3 cases. In addition, the complications in the reconstruction LCP group was hypertrophic scarring in 4 cases, painful shoulder in 1 case and a limitation of shoulder motion in 1case (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

This study showed radiologically and clinically satisfactory results in both groups. Overall, operative treatment with a Reconstruction plate or reconstruction LCP for clavicle shaft fractures can be used to obtain stable fixation.