A motor plan is accessible for voluntary initiation and involuntary triggering at similar short latencies

Movement goals are an essential component of motor planning, altering voluntary and involuntary motor actions. While there have been many studies of motor planning, it is unclear if motor goals influence voluntary and involuntary movements at similar latencies. The objectives of this study were to determine how long it takes to prepare a motor action and to compare this time for voluntary and involuntary movements. We hypothesized a prepared motor action would influence voluntarily and involuntarily initiated movements at the same latency. We trained subjects to reach with a forced reaction time paradigm and used a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) to trigger involuntary initiation of the same reaches. The time available to prepare was controlled by varying when one of four reach targets was presented. Reach direction was used to evaluate accuracy. We quantified the time between target presentation and the cue or trigger for movement initiation. We found that reaches were accurately initiated when the target was presented 48 ms before the SAS and 162 ms before the cue to voluntarily initiate movement. While the SAS precisely controlled the latency of movement onset, voluntary reach onset was more variable. We, therefore, quantified the time between target presentation and movement onset and found no significant difference in the time required to plan reaches initiated voluntarily or involuntarily (∆ = 8 ms, p = 0.2). These results demonstrate that the time required to plan accurate reaches is similar regardless of if they are initiated voluntarily or triggered involuntarily. This finding may inform the understanding of neural pathways governing storage and access of motor plans.

Tradeoffs of estimating reaction time with absolute and relative thresholds

Measuring the duration of cognitive processing with reaction time is fundamental to several subfields of psychology. Many methods exist for estimating movement initiation when measuring reaction time, but there is an incomplete understanding of their relative performance. The purpose of the present study was to identify and compare the tradeoffs of 19 estimates of movement initiation across two experiments. We focused our investigation on estimating movement initiation on each trial with filtered kinematic and kinetic data. Nine of the estimates involved absolute thresholds (e.g., acceleration 1000 back to 200 mm/s2, micro push-button switch), and the remaining ten estimates used relative thresholds (e.g., force extrapolation, 5% of maximum velocity). The criteria were the duration of reaction time, immunity to the movement amplitude, responsiveness to visual feedback during movement execution, reliability, and the number of manually corrected trials (efficacy). The three best overall estimates, in descending order, were yank extrapolation, force extrapolation, and acceleration 1000 to 200 mm/s2. The sensitive micro push-button switch, which was the simplest estimate, had a decent overall score, but it was a late estimate of movement initiation. The relative thresholds based on kinematics had the six worst overall scores. An issue with the relative kinematic thresholds was that they were biased by the movement amplitude. In summary, we recommend measuring reaction time on each trial with one of the three best overall estimates of movement initiation. Future research should continue to refine existing estimates while also exploring new ones.

[Late-life depression and frailty-Epidemiological, clinical and neurobiological associations]

BACKGROUND

Depression is the most common mental disorder in older adults and is influenced by age-related processes. Frailty is a well-established clinical expression of ageing that implies a state of increased vulnerability to stressor events as well as increased risks of disability, hospitalization and death. Neurobiological findings will disentangle the comorbidity of frailty and depression and may inform future management of depression in old age.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides an overview of the comorbidity of late-life depression and frailty, with a focus on neuroscientific findings that are organized within the research domain criteria (RDoC) framework.

RESULTS

More than one third of old people with depression are affected by frailty, which results in more chronic depression and in poorer efficacy and tolerability of antidepressant medication. Depression and frailty share motivational and psychomotor characteristics, particularly apathy, decreased physical activity and fatigue. In patients with frailty, altered activity of the supplementary motor cortex is associated with motor performance deficits. Patients with late-life depression and apathy are characterized by abnormal structure and altered functional connectivity of the reward network and the salience network, along with altered functional connectivity of these networks with premotor brain areas.

CONCLUSION

Identifying frailty in older adults with depression is relevant for prognostic assessment and treatment. A better understanding of the neuronal mechanisms of comorbidity will provide potential targets for future personalized therapeutic interventions.

When the cerebellum holds the starting gun

How the cerebellum affects movement onset is poorly understood. In this issue of Neuron, Dacre et al. (2021) establish that in the context of operant conditioning, the transient activation of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway to the motor cortex is sufficient to initiate the conditioned movement.

Timing accuracy in self-timed movements related to neural indicators of movement initiation

Timely movement initiation is crucial in quick reactions or when a series of movements has to be strung together in a timed fashion to create a coordinated sequence. Stochastic neural variability can lead to misinitiation errors as reaction time studies suggest. Higher reaction times occur when preparatory neural activity reaches an initiation threshold later relative to shorter reaction times. Whether this also applies to self-timed movements is harder to scrutinize because they lack an external event that could serve as a reference for timing accuracy estimations. By example of a self-timed goal-oriented throwing task, we used a method that synchronizes the throwing movements by their kinematic profiles to assess relative timing differences in throwing release. We determined neural preparatory processes of the release using the movement-related electrophysiological Bereitschaftspotential (BP). By analyzing differences in shape and timing of the BP in delayed and non-delayed throws, two variables could be extracted that are related to timing differences on the kinematic level. First, temporal deviations in BP curves partly meet the kinematic deviations. Second, delayed releases were preceded by a short flattening of the BP curves prior to release. Thus, temporal and shape deviations in the neural movement initiation are assumed to delay self-timed movements.