Laparoscopic versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is one of the most frequently used operations for the restoration of apical support in women with uterovaginal prolapse. However, existing studies are inconclusive as to whether and which surgical access route is superior. The aim of the present meta-analysis is tentatively to compare the efficiency and the postoperative complications of laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS) and vaginal USLS (V-USLS), highlighting that current evidence remains inconclusive regarding the superiority of either surgical access route.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic literature review of 5 major databases (Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov) from inception till April 2023.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

No language restrictions were applied. All comparative studies that compared L-USLS and V-USLS for the management of women with uterovaginal prolapse were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data from 6 retrospective cohort studies on 856 patients were extracted and analyzed. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool and ranged between moderate to serious. The pooled results suggest that L-USLS was associated with a potentially decreased incidence of ureteral compromise (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.89; p = .04) and seemingly lower objective (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.97; p = .04) and subjective recurrence rates (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.92; p = .03). There were no significant differences between the rates of postoperative pain from USLS sutures, postoperative pelvic hematomas, the suture exposure/granulation tissue formation, and the prolapse recurrence retreatment among the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicates that L-USLS is possibly associated with significantly fewer ureteral compromise rates and decreased subjective and objective recurrences rates compared to V-USLS. Nevertheless, given the limitations in data quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Large-scale randomized studies are essential to more definitively determine the relative merits of the laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.

Long-term outcomes and five-year recurrence-free survival curves after native-tissue prolapse repair

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term objective and subjective outcomes to build recurrence-free survival curves after mesh-free uterosacral ligament suspension and to evaluate the long-term impact of prognostic factors on outcome measures.

METHODS

A retrospective study analyzed 5-year follow-up after repair of primary prolapse through high uterosacral ligament suspension. Bulging symptoms and post-operative prolapse stage II or above were considered subjective and objective recurrences, respectively. The cumulative proportion of relapse-free patients in time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total of 353 women were analyzed. Five-year recurrence rates were 15.0% for objective recurrence, 13.0% for subjective recurrence, and 4.0% for the combined objective and subjective recurrences. Premenopausal status was shown to be a risk factor for anatomic (P=0.022), symptomatic (P=0.001), and combined (P=0.047) recurrence. Conversely, anterior repair was shown to be a protective factor for symptomatic (P=0.012) and combined (P=0.002) recurrence. Most of the recurrences occurred within 2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes after high uterosacral ligament suspension were satisfactory. Premenopausal status and lack of anterior repair represented risk factors for recurrence in the long term.

Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence after native-tissue vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (POSUI) after native-tissue prolapse repair without a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure.

METHODS

The present single-center retrospective study included women with genital prolapse who underwent high uterosacral ligament suspension without a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure during 2008-2013. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for POSUI (identified through clinical interview and International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF] self-administration) at 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 87 (20.9%) of 417 women developed POSUI. Preoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamically diagnosed SUI were significantly associated with POSUI; moreover, women with POSUI had a higher preoperative ICIQ-SF score, a lower opening detrusor pressure, and a lower detrusor pressure at maximum flow than did women without POSUI (P<0.05 for all comparisons). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative SUI (odds ratio 3.11), a detrusor pressure at maximum flow of less than 30 cm H₂ O (odds ratio 2.93), and urodynamically diagnosed SUI (odds ratio 2.26) were independent risk factors for POSUI.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative urodynamic parameters, obtained before prolapse repair surgery, were associated with POSUI and could be useful in providing adequate counseling to facilitate decision making on whether to add a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure.

Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Identification of risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence is crucial to provide adequate preoperative counselling and tailor surgical treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify risk factors for recurrence in a large series of patients with POP treated with primary transvaginal native-tissue repair involving high uterosacral ligament suspension.

METHODS

Postoperative descent of POP-Q stage 2 or higher in any compartment was considered as recurrence. Global recurrence (GR) was defined as any recurrence in any compartment irrespective of the surgical procedures performed during primary prolapse surgery. True recurrence (TR) was defined as recurrence in a compartment repaired during primary prolapse surgery.

RESULTS

Of a total of 533 eligible women, 519 were available for follow-up. Univariate analysis showed that age ≤50 years, premenopausal status, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²), history of severe macrosomia (>4,500 g), preoperative POP stage 3 or higher and absence of anterior repair at the time of POP surgery were risk factors for GR. Multivariate analysis confirmed lack of posterior repair (odds ratio, OR, 1.8), severe macrosomia (OR 2.7), premenopausal status (OR 3.9), obesity (OR 2.2) and preoperative stage 3 or higher (OR  2.6) as risk factors for GR. Univariate analysis showed that premenopausal status and preoperative POP stage 3 or higher were risk factors for TR. Multivariate analysis confirmed premenopausal status (OR 4.0) and preoperative stage 3 or higher (OR 4.5) as risk factors for TR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed preoperative stage 3 or higher as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence. The study also identified additional risk factors for surgical failure including lack of posterior repair, severe macrosomia, premenopausal status and obesity.