A literature review

INTRODUCTION

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is frequently associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and may occur after its surgical treatment.

AIM

To determine the incidence, risk factors and management of SUI during and after POP surgery through a review of the available literature.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Narrative literature review on the incidence and management of SUI after POP surgery after search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo published in Spanish and English between 2013 and 2023.

RESULTS

Occult SUI is defined as visible urine leakage when prolapse is reduced in patients without SUI symptoms. De novo SUI develops after prolapse surgery without having previously existed. In continent patients, the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of de novo SUI is estimated to be 9 patients and about 17 to avoid repeat incontinence surgery. In patients with occult UI, the NNT to avoid repeat incontinence surgery is around 7. Patients with POP and concomitant SUI are the group most likely to benefit from combined surgery with a more favorable NNT (NNT 2).

CONCLUSION

Quality studies on combined surgery for treatment SUI and POP repair are lacking. Continent patients with prolapse should be warned of the risk of de novo SUI, although concomitant incontinence treatment is not currently recommended. Incontinence surgery should be considered on an individual basis in patients with prolapse and SUI.

Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle function on the success of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to identify the potential characteristics of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in the preoperative assessment that could be associated with post-surgical prolapse severity. We hypothesized that the same variables, if identified, could be addressed in preoperative rehabilitation to improve surgical results.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective observational study that included women who underwent surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair between 2020-2022. Genital prolapse was evaluated according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. All the participants underwent a PFM assessment, including a vaginal digital assessment and manometry (Peritron™ 9300 V) before surgery and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Several PFM variables were recorded: vaginal resting pressure, vaginal pressure during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), area under the curve during a 10-second MVC, ability to correctly contract the PFMs, and reflexive activation during cough and relaxation. The primary endpoint of the analysis was objective surgical success defined as POP-Q 0 or 1 at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, a change in pelvic floor muscle function was recorded during postoperative visits.

RESULTS

A total of 106 females were included in the study. Fifty-one were lost during the 6-month follow-up, which is a major limitation of the study. None of the examined parameters evaluating PFM were associated with surgical success. No statistically significant difference was found in MVC and PFM endurance before and after surgery. Post-surgery, a significant change was observed in the vaginal resting pressure and the ability to correct PFM activation and relaxation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PFM function is not associated with surgical success 6 months after surgery.

The clinical utility of routine postoperative hemoglobin and creatinine after reconstructive surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Postoperative laboratory tests are routinely ordered after apical prolapse repair on asymptomatic patients. We hypothesize that routine serum hemoglobin (Hb) and creatinine (Cr) have limited clinical utility in the postoperative period in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgical repair of apical prolapse between 2017 and 2019 at our institution. Subjects were divided into two groups postoperatively: symptomatic and asymptomatic anemia. Symptomatic patients were defined as having one or more of the following: blood pressure (BP) <90/60, heart rate (HR) >100, urine output <30 cc/h, subjective dizziness, flank pain, or abdominal pain. The primary aim was to evaluate the utility of postoperative serum Hb and Cr in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests analyzed categorical and continuous data respectively. A total of 325 patients were included.

RESULTS

Patients with symptomatic anemia had a larger decrease in Hb on postoperative day 1 (POD1) with a mean decrease of -18.11% (± 6.64) compared with asymptomatic patients, who had a mean difference of -15.49% (± 5.63; p < 0.001). The total cost of tests evaluating Hb was US$61,745. Patients with symptomatic acute kidney injury had an increase in Cr on POD1 compared with asymptomatic patients, with a mean increase of 0.23% (± 16.06) and -3.07% (± 13.10) respectively (p < 0.05). The total cost of tests including Cr was US$131,812.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that routine postoperative Hb and Cr testing for apical prolapse should be reserved for symptomatic patients as it has minimal clinical value in asymptomatic patients and contributes to increased overall health care cost.

[Radiological imaging following pelvic prolapse surgery]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition in women, for which both conservative and surgical interventions are available. Knowledge of the different surgical procedures and the materials used is essential for adequate radiological diagnosis after prolapse surgery in order to differentiate potential complications from normal postoperative changes.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) is often the modality of choice for evaluating acute complications such as bleeding or organ injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue contrast and is therefore generally preferred for assessing subacute and chronic complications.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Innovative techniques such as dynamic MRI protocols can improve the radiological assessment after prolapse surgery by enabling the evaluation of organ mobility.

PERFORMANCE

Radiological standard procedures such as computed tomography (CT) and MRI provide detailed and reliable information about the postoperative site and potential complications following prolapse surgery.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Radiological imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients after prolapse surgery, particularly when complications are suspected. Accurate radiological diagnosis can guide further appropriate therapeutic measures.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in posterior colporrhaphy does not reduce postoperative infection: a nationwide observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to explore if antibiotic prophylaxis prevents postoperative infection after a posterior colporrhaphy.

METHODS

In this register-based nationwide cohort study data were collected from the "The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery" (GynOp). Women 18 years or older who underwent a primary posterior colporrhaphy between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 were included. Patients undergoing any concomitant prolapse procedure, mesh surgery, or incontinence procedure were excluded. The cohort was divided into two groups based on administration of antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 1,218) or not (n = 4,884). The primary outcome of this study was patient-reported infectious complication requiring antibiotic treatment. Secondary outcome measures included patient satisfaction and prolapse-related symptoms at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 7,799 patients who underwent posterior colporrhaphy and met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria were identified in the register database. Of these patients 6,102 answered the primary outcome question (79%). In the antibiotic prophylaxis group a total of 138 reported a postoperative infection (11%) and in the no antibiotic prophylaxis group the corresponding data were 520 (11%). There were no significant differences regarding either the primary or the secondary outcomes between the study groups.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide Swedish register study antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a reduced risk of postoperative infection after a posterior colporrhaphy.

Comparative anatomy of the ovine and human pelvis for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: evaluating the effectiveness of the ovine model

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a functional reconstructive surgery used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in middle-aged women. Although LSC is widely used, its implementation is hindered by perceived technical difficulties and surgical learning curves. Surgeons require adequate experience with LSC prior to performing the procedure on patients to improve their quality of life. This study is aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the ovine model (OM) for training and research in LSC, while also comparing anatomical differences between ovine and human models during the procedure.

METHODS

The animal model and training were provided by the Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. Urologists and gynecologists with experience in LSC participated in a course and their findings were recorded and documented.

RESULTS

Differences in patient positioning, trocar placement, and reperitonealization were identified between the ovine and human models. Hysterectomy is always performed in the ovine model, whereas it is not mandatory in humans. There are also differences in the dissection of the levator ani muscle and attachment point of the posterior mesh to the uterus between the two models. Despite differences in some areas, the ovine pelvic structure and vagina are similar in size to those of humans.

CONCLUSIONS

The ovine model is a valuable tool for surgeons in their learning curve for LSC, allowing for safe and effective practice prior to performing the procedure on patients. The use of the OM can help to improve the quality of life for women affected by pelvic organ prolapse.

Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Enlarged genital hiatus (GH) is associated with prolapse recurrence following prolapse repair. Perineorrhaphy is often performed to reduce GH. However, changes in GH between the time of surgery and follow up are poorly understood. Our primary aim was to compare the intra-operative resting GH at the conclusion of surgery with the resting GH 3 months post-operatively in patients who undergo perineorrhaphy. We hypothesized that the intra-operative resting GH would be sustained.

METHODS

Patients planning apical prolapse surgery were prospectively enrolled. Perineorrhaphy was performed at the surgeon's discretion. GH was measured pre-operatively in clinic, intra-operatively before and after surgery (resting), and 3 months post-operatively (resting and Valsalva).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine perineorrhaphy and 27 no perineorrhaphy patients completed 3-month follow-up. Groups were similar in age (63.9 y, SD 10.4), body mass index (28.3 kg/m², SD 5.2) and prior prolapse surgery (19.6%). Median (interquartile range) baseline Valsalva GH was larger in the perineorrhaphy group (4.5 (4 - 5.5) vs 3.5 (3 - 4) cm, p < 0.01). Median resting GH at 3 months was 0.5 cm less than end of surgery in the perineorrhaphy group (p < 0.01). The median change in GH between baseline and 3-month follow up was greater with perineorrhaphy (-1.5 vs -0.5 cm, p < 0.01). This difference was not seen in the sacrocolpopexy subgroup (-1.75 vs -1.5, p = 0.14; n = 24).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can be reassured that the intra-operative change in GH resulting from perineorrhaphy is sustained 3 months after surgery and similar to the more commonly measured preoperative to postoperative change in Valsalva GH.

Mesh safety in pelvic surgery: Our experience and outcome of biological mesh used in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) continues to be a popular treatment option for rectal prolapse, obstructive defecation/faecal incontinence and rectoceles. In recent years there have been concerns regarding the safety of mesh placements in the pelvis.

AIM

To assess the safety of the mesh and the outcome of the procedure.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients underwent LVMR with Permacol (Biological) mesh from 2012 to 2018 at University Hospital Wishaw. Forty were treated for obstructive defecation secondary to prolapse, rectocele or internal rectal intussusception, 38 for mixed symptoms obstructive defecation and incontinence, 5 for pain and bleeding secondary to full thickness prolapse and 3 with symptoms of incontinence. Questionnaires for the calculation of Wexner scores for constipation and incontinence were completed by the patients who were followed up in the clinic 12 wk after surgery and again in 6-12 mo. The average review of their notes was 18.3 ± 4.2 mo.

RESULTS

The median Wexner scores for constipation pre-operatively and post-operatively were 14.5 [Interquartile range (IQR): 10.5-18.5] and 3 (IQR: 1-6), respectively, while the median Wexner score for faecal incontinence was 11 (IQR: 7-15) and 2 (IQR: 0-5), respectively (P < 0.01). There were 4 (4.6%) recurrences, 2 cases that presented with erosion of a suture through the rectum and one with diskitis. No mesh complications or mortalities were recorded.

CONCLUSION

LVMR using a Permacol mesh is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of obstructive defecation/faecal incontinence, rectal prolapse, rectoceles and internal rectal prolapse/intussusception.

Preoperative level II/III MRI measures predicting long-term prolapse recurrence after native tissue repair

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To identify preoperative level II/III MRI measures associated with long-term recurrence after native tissue prolapse repair.

METHODS

Women who previously participated in pelvic floor research involving MRI prior to undergoing primary native tissue prolapse repair were recruited to return for repeat examination and MRI. Recurrence was defined by POP-Q (Ba/Bp > 0 or C > -4), repeat surgery, or pessary use. Preoperative MR images were used to perform five level II/III measurements including a new levator plate (LP) shape analysis at rest and maximal Valsalva. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate LP shape variations. Principal component scores calculated for two independent shape variations were noted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five women were included with a mean follow-up of 13.2 ± 3.3 years. Nineteen (54%) were in the success group. There were no statistical differences between success versus recurrence groups in demographic, clinical, or surgical characteristics. Women with recurrence had a larger preoperative resting levator hiatus [median 6.4 cm (IQR 5.7, 7.1) vs. 5.8 cm (IQR 5.3, 6.3), p = 0.03]. This measure was associated with increased odds of recurrence (OR 8.2, CI 1.4-48.9, p = 0.02). Using PCA, preoperative LP shape PC1 scores were different between success and recurrence groups (p = 0.02), with a more dorsally oriented LP shape associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger preoperative levator hiatus at rest and a more dorsally oriented levator plate shape were associated with prolapse recurrence at long-term follow-up. For every 1 cm increase in preoperative resting levator hiatus, the odds of long-term prolapse recurrence increases 8-fold.

Vaginal Patch Plastron for cystocele repair at the time of vaginal prosthesis bashing: A technical note (with video)

Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh related complications and recommend a vaginal route without prosthesis in first intention. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy, vaginal patch plastron and para vaginal repair. However, in case of vaginal patch plastron, the vagina left in contact with the bladder is a material of much better quality than colporraphy alone. The multiplication of native tissues, generating post-operative fibrosis, associated with anchorage on a strong ligamentous structure, allows to expect better outcomes compared to anterior colporraphy. Indeed, vaginal plastron corrects median cystoceles with a vaginal strip as well as lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. Thereby, vaginal patch plastron appears to be a good compromise between the 3 autologous techniques with median and paralateral repair We aimed to describe the surgical technique of the vaginal patch plastron for vaginal native tissue repair for cystocele.

Prolapse Surgery: What Kind of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Necessary?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis or therapy is sufficient for laparoscopic or vaginal prolapse surgery with mesh.

METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study. The study was divided into 3 groups. Protocol A: metronidazole (15 mg/kg) and piperacillin-tazobactam (2 g) 1 h before surgery and, for postoperative treatment, gentamycin (160 mg) 1 h before surgery in a single dose. Metronidazole and piperacillin-tazobactam were administered until hospital discharge. Protocol B: gentamycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in the same manner as group A. Protocol C: clindamycin (600 mg) and gentamicin (160 mg) 1 h before surgery in a single dose.

RESULTS

We included 87 consecutive patients who underwent prolapse surgery involving mesh prostheses: 57 by the laparoscopic approach and 30 by the vaginal route. Of these, 30 patients were included in protocol A, 30 in protocol B, and 27 in protocol C. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 protocols regarding any postoperative complications, except for urinary tract infections that were more in the vaginal approach than in the laparoscopic route, in protocol A (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

One-shot prophylaxis can be successfully used in prolapse surgery regardless of the surgical approach.

Intraoperative ultrasound assessment of ureteral patency during pelvic surgery

Ureteral injuries probably represent the most feared complication of benign hysterectomies. Lack of proper intraoperative detection causes diagnostic delay, which results in additional hospitalization, prolonged catheterization, and multiple additional procedures. However, the policy of universal cystoscopy is still under debate, owing to costs, increased operative time, lack of proper training, and risk of trauma. Intraoperative ultrasound assessment can offer a valid alternative for evaluating ureteral patency. After intravenous administration of 300 ml of saline solution and 10 mg of furosemide, the bladder is filled with 300 ml of saline solution. Transabdominal ultrasound bladder scans are obtained with a convex 3.5-MHz probe in transverse planes. The power Doppler field size is set to include the entire posterior wall of the bladder, at the level of the ureterovesical junctions. Ureteral patency test is considered normal if jets are present on both sides. It is considered abnormal when either absent or comparatively diminished on one side. It is considered nondiagnostic when neither side is visualized. Cystoscopy should be performed in the case of abnormal or nondiagnostic sonographic findings. Intraoperative transabdominal power Doppler ultrasound represents a feasible, non-invasive, and inexpensive diagnostic tool for assessing ureteral patency during gynecological surgery.

Readmissions and perioperative outcomes for same-day versus next-day discharge after prolapse surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to evaluate the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) compared with next-day discharge (NDD) after prolapse surgery on a national level hypothesizing that readmission and complication rates after SDD would not be higher than NDD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database including 2014-2018. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify minimally invasive apical suspensions or obliterative procedures. Exclusion criteria were length of stay > 1 day, unrelated concomitant procedures, serious medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class >2, and complication during index admission. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission, and secondary outcomes included 30-day complications.

RESULTS

12,583 were included in analysis. SDD rate was 16.7%. The majority of women were white (91%) with a mean age of 59 years and mean body mass index of 28 kg/m². Medical comorbidities were similar between the SDD and NDD groups. Overall incidence of 30-day readmission was 1.7%. SDD had lower odds of 30-day readmission than NDD (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98). SDD had lower odds of 30-day complications but this failed to reach statistical significance (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, 30-day readmission and complication rates were not higher after SDD compared to NDD in women undergoing minimally-invasive apical suspension or obliterative procedures. We interpret these findings carefully given study limitations but believe our findings support the safety of SDD after minimally invasive apical suspension or obliterative procedures in a low-risk population.

Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and health-related quality of life: a follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic prolapse impairs quality of life. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is considered an important outcome of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. However, it is rarely reported, and measures are inadequately used. Thus, studies reporting patient-reported surgical outcomes in low-income contexts are needed. This study aims to evaluate the effect of prolapse surgery on patient HRQoL and determine the predictive factors for change in HRQoL.

METHODS

A total of 215 patients who had prolapse stage III or IV were enrolled. Patients underwent vaginal native tissue repair, and their HRQoL was evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Effect of surgery on subjective outcomes were measured using validated Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL-20), Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Body Image in Prolapse (BIPOP), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Patient Global Index of Improvement (PGI-I) tools. A linear mixed-effect model was used to compare pre- and postoperative P-QoL scores and investigate potential predictors of the changes in P-QoL scores.

RESULTS

In total, 193 (89.7%) patients were eligible for analysis at 3 months, and 185 (86.0%) at 6 months. Participant's mean age was 49.3 ± 9.4 years. The majority of patients had prolapse stage III (81.9%) and underwent vaginal hysterectomy (55.3%). All domains of P-QoL improved significantly after surgery. Altogether more than 72% of patients reported clinically meaningful improvement in condition-specific quality of life measured with P-QoL-20 at 6 months. An improvement in POP-SS, BIPOP, and the PHQ-9 scores were also observed during both follow-up assessments. At 6 months after surgery, only 2.7% of patients reported the presence of bulge symptoms. A total of 97.8% of patients had reported improvement in comparison to the preoperative state, according to PGI-I. The change in P-QoL score after surgery was associated with the change in POP-SS, PHQ, BIPOP scores and marital status (p < 0.001). However, age, type of surgery, and prolapse stage were not associated with the improvement of P-QoL scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair for prolapse effectively improves patient's HRQoL, and patient satisfaction is high. The result could be useful for patient counselling on the expected HRQoL outcomes of surgical treatment. Surgical service should be accessible for patients suffering from POP to improve HRQoL.

Assessing vaginal pressure profiles before and after prolapse surgery using an intravaginal pressure sensor (femfit®)

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The impact of surgery on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function remains uncertain. There is a pressure differential along the length of the vagina, influenced by surrounding active and passive tissue structures, giving rise to a pressure profile. The aim of this study is to determine if an intravaginal pressure sensor, femfit®, can measure differences in pressure profiles before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

This pilot study includes 22 women undergoing POP surgery. Intravaginal pressure profiles were measured with femfit® pre- and post-surgery and differences tested using paired Student's t-tests. Patients completed validated questionnaires for vaginal, bowel, and urinary incontinence symptoms pre- and post-POP surgery and a femfit® usability questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixteen sets of vaginal pressure data were analysed. The highest pressure generated was identified as the peak PFM pressure, whilst all sensor measurements provided a pressure profile. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured by the most distal sensor, 8. On average, the difference between peak PFM pressure and IAP was significantly greater post-surgery (p < 0.01). Urinary and vaginal symptom questionnaire scores were significantly improved after POP surgery. Femfit® usability questionnaires demonstrated high levels of patient acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

Women generate higher peak PFM pressures compared to IAP post-POP surgery, with pressure profiles that are comparable to women without POP. This metric might be useful to assess the outcome of POP surgery and encourage women to maintain this profile via PFM training, potentially reducing POP recurrence risk.

Management of Vaginal Mesh Exposures Following Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss considerations and current evidence for the diagnosis and management of vaginal mesh exposures following female mesh-augmented anti-incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the introduction of mesh into female pelvic surgery, various applications have been reported, each with their own unique risk profile. The most commonly encountered mesh-related complication is vaginal mesh exposure. Current evidence on the management of vaginal mesh exposure is largely limited to observational studies and case series, though this is continuing to expand. We present a synthesis of the available data, as well as clinical and surgical approaches to managing this complication. It is important for surgeons to be familiar with the management of vaginal mesh exposures. Depending on the patient's presentation and goals, there is a role for conservative measures, mesh revision, or mesh excision. Further study is warranted to standardize mesh resection techniques and explore non-surgical treatments.

Methods for the defining mechanisms of anterior vaginal wall descent (DEMAND) study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The protocol and analysis methods for the Defining Mechanisms of Anterior Vaginal Wall Descent (DEMAND) study are presented. DEMAND was designed to identify mechanisms and contributors of prolapse recurrence after two transvaginal apical suspension procedures for uterovaginal prolapse.

METHODS

DEMAND is a supplementary cohort study of a clinical trial in which women with uterovaginal prolapse randomized to (1) vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension or (2) vaginal mesh hysteropexy underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 30-42 months post-surgery. Standardized protocols have been developed to systematize MRI examinations across multiple sites and to improve reliability of MRI measurements. Anatomical failure, based on MRI, is defined as prolapse beyond the hymen. Anatomic measures from co-registered rest, maximal strain, and post-strain rest (recovery) sequences are obtained from the "true mid-sagittal" plane defined by a 3D pelvic coordinate system. The primary outcome is the mechanism of failure (apical descent versus anterior vaginal wall elongation). Secondary outcomes include displacement of the vaginal apex and perineal body and elongation of the anterior wall, posterior wall, perimeter, and introitus of the vagina between (1) rest and strain and (2) rest and recovery.

RESULTS

Recruitment and MRI trials of 94 participants were completed by May 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods papers which detail studies designed to evaluate anatomic outcomes of prolapse surgeries are few. We describe a systematic, standardized approach to define and quantitatively assess mechanisms of anatomic failure following prolapse repair. This study will provide a better understanding of how apical prolapse repairs fail anatomically.

Pessary offer documentation in women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse at a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Women report similar functional outcomes after pessary treatment or surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

AIMS

To assess the documentation of pessary counselling in women who underwent surgery for POP. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on women who underwent hysterectomy for prolapse. The primary outcome measure was documentation regarding offer of pessary. 'Pessary offer' was defined as documentation that clearly stated that the care provider offered pessary to the patient.

FINDINGS

Over the study period, 81 hysterectomies took place for POP; pessary offer was documented for only 19 (23.5%) case records. Characteristics significantly associated with pessary offer were history of chronic cough (P=0.031), previous pelvic surgery (P<0.001), no secondary indication for surgery (P=0.012), concomitant surgery performed other than hysterectomy (P=0.046), age range (P<0.001) and BMI range (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pessary offer was documented in less than quarter of cases. This denotes a need to strengthen documentation of offer, counselling for pessary, or both of these.

Concomitant stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Opportunity or overtreatment?

OBJECTIVES

The association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is very common. When POP surgery is indicated and the patient has concomitant SUI, there are two treatment strategies: the one-step strategy (concomitant correction of POP and SUI) and the two-step strategy (correction of POP with subsequent evaluation of SUI). Guidelines from the International Continence Society and International Consultation on Incontinence recommend that a urodynamic assessment (UA) should be performed before surgery as this can reveal the presence of urodynamic SUI, but the role of UA is the subject of debate as it does not seem to improve treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to identify the presence of pre-operative urodynamic parameters that were predictive of POSUI, and to identify patients who could benefit from concomitant correction of SUI during POP surgery STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation was undertaken of 155 patients with at least second-degree POP who underwent POP surgery after UA between 2009 and 2016 in an Italian gynaecology and obstetrics department. Of these, 61 patients were clinically incontinent before surgery and 94 patients were clinically continent. After UA, patients were stratified using a maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) cut-off of 50 cmH₂O; the risk of POSUI was calculated using this value.

RESULTS

POP surgery alone resolved SUI in 60 % of the 61 clinically incontinent patients; only 30 % of these patients had urodynamic SUI and >50 % did not have POSUI. Thirty-six percent of the 94 continent patients had occult SUI on UA and 16 % developed de-novo POSUI. Seventy-five percent of all patients with occult SUI did not develop de-novo SUI. MUCP was lower in patients with POSUI than in patients without POSUI (p=0.013). The probability of POSUI was higher in patients with MUCP ≤50 cmH₂O. The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of POSUI in these patients was 2, compared with an NNT of 4 in the continent group. Eight percent of patients underwent further surgery for SUI.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically incontinent patients with MUCP ≤50 cmH₂O will gain the greatest benefit from concomitant POP and SUI surgery. However, concomitant surgery has more severe adverse events. Given that 62.3 % of patients resolved SUI after POP surgery alone, it is important not to overtreat these women. Clinical pre-operative SUI is the best indicator of POSUI and was found to increase the risk of POSUI (odds ratio 3.2, 95 % confidence interval 1.5-6.8; p=0.003). Despite the small sample size, the two-step strategy appears to result in lower use of mid-urethral slings and a clear reduction in complications. It is important not to focus on the diagnosis of urodynamic SUI in continent patients but to evaluate MUCP carefully.

The importance of using 3D ultrasound during pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to pre- and post-operative quality of life questionnaires

AIM

The main aim of this study is to evaluate the interest of three-dimensional ultrasound perineal in the measurement of the levator hiatus area as an objective reflection of the surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Our hypothesis is that POP surgery decreases the size of the levator hiatus area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A longitudinal and prospective study was conducted between April and July 2017 in the Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics at University Hospital of Angers. Surgery was performed either by laparoscopy (sacrocolpopexy) or vaginal surgery (with or without the use of mesh). All patients were handed an information letter and signed an informed consent before being included in the study. A questionnaire was fullfilled before and one month after surgery. A clinical evaluation using the simplified POP-Q classification and a perineal 3D ultrasound were carried out before and after surgery by the same professional. The levator hiatus area was assessed before and after surgery in order to evaluate the impact of surgery on the levator hiatus area. Simplified POP-Q measurements and responses to PFDI-20 and PFDI-7 questionnaires were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients were included in the study and four were excluded. Seven underwent laparoscopic surgery and seven underwent vaginal surgery. The levator hiatus area decreased substantially from 20.87 to 16.55cm² on mean (p=0.0001) at rest. Regarding patient satisfaction, the PFDI-20 score improved after surgery from 89.36 to 37.87 on mean (p=0.006), but the PFIQ-7 score did not reveal any significant changes (p=0.096). For the clinical examination, we used the simplified POP-Q with Ba measurement from 2.3 to -1.92cm (p=0.005) or Bp from -1.5 to -2.46cm, which is not a significant change (p=0.14). Points C (or D in cases with a history of hysterectomy) changed from -3.1 to -6.15cm (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

The levator hiatus area seems to decrease after POP surgery. 3D ultrasound seems a new and complementary procedure that allowed to evaluate objectively the levator hiatus area and thus the clinical findings of the surgery.

Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is associated with specific complications. Our primary objective was to assess the recurrence requiring reoperation after prolapse surgery, and our secondary objectives were to assess the early complications and secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.

METHODS

Retrospective study of a population-based cohort of all hospital or outpatient stays including POP surgery from 2008 to 2014, using the French nationwide discharge summary database. We calculated the rates of hospital readmission following surgery as well as the rates of reoperation for recurrent prolapse and subsequent procedures performed for urinary incontinence.

RESULTS

A total of 310,938 patients had undergone surgery for POP. Two hundred fourteen (0.07%) patients died, and 0.45% were admitted to an intensive care unit; 4.4% of the patients underwent surgery for the recurrence of prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy in the first surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of POP surgery recurrence: (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.51 [0.49; 0.53]). A total of 1386 (2.5%) patients were readmitted to the hospital for early (30-day) complications of prolapse surgery. The most frequent reasons for early readmission were local infection (32.8%), hemorrhage (21.4%) and pain (17.2%). Risk factors for complications were obesity, hospitals with low levels of activity and associated incontinence surgery; 4.6% of the patients required secondary surgery for urinary incontinence; obesity was a risk factor (HR [95% CI] = 1.12 [1.01; 1.24]), and the vaginal route was a protective factor (odds ratio = 1.86 for laparoscopy, 1.44 for laparotomy and 1.25 for multiple approaches).

CONCLUSIONS

POP surgery is associated with low rates of complication and recurrence. Complications occurred most commonly following combined surgeries for both prolapse and incontinence and in hospitals with low surgical volumes. Concomitant hysterectomy appears to be protective for the need for additional prolapse surgery, and the vaginal route leads to a lower frequency of secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.

Long-term outcomes and five-year recurrence-free survival curves after native-tissue prolapse repair

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term objective and subjective outcomes to build recurrence-free survival curves after mesh-free uterosacral ligament suspension and to evaluate the long-term impact of prognostic factors on outcome measures.

METHODS

A retrospective study analyzed 5-year follow-up after repair of primary prolapse through high uterosacral ligament suspension. Bulging symptoms and post-operative prolapse stage II or above were considered subjective and objective recurrences, respectively. The cumulative proportion of relapse-free patients in time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total of 353 women were analyzed. Five-year recurrence rates were 15.0% for objective recurrence, 13.0% for subjective recurrence, and 4.0% for the combined objective and subjective recurrences. Premenopausal status was shown to be a risk factor for anatomic (P=0.022), symptomatic (P=0.001), and combined (P=0.047) recurrence. Conversely, anterior repair was shown to be a protective factor for symptomatic (P=0.012) and combined (P=0.002) recurrence. Most of the recurrences occurred within 2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes after high uterosacral ligament suspension were satisfactory. Premenopausal status and lack of anterior repair represented risk factors for recurrence in the long term.

Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?

Objective

To investigate which specific clinical factors influence patients’ choice of prolapse treatment.

Methods

This study includes a total of 510 cases with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) of stage II or higher requiring prolapse treatment. Patients were divided into surgery and pessary groups according to their own choice and treatment preference. Primary outcome of interest was to define potential clinical parameters, which contribute to surgical treatment decision.

Results

A total of 252/510 (49%) women decided for prolapse surgery and 258/510 (51%) cases were treated conservatively with vaginal pessary. Hypertension, COPD as well as polypharmacy were parameters, which were statistically significantly more common in the pessary group compared to the surgically managed cases (p <0.05). On the contrary, women undergoing prolapse surgery were significantly younger and showed more advanced POP-Q (pelvic organ prolapse quantification) stages (p < 0.05). Clinical factors, such as BMI (body mass index), parity, mode of delivery and postmenopausal status, did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced POP-Q stage (p < 0.001) as well as the absence of smoking (p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with surgical treatment decision.

Conclusion

Women, who favoured prolapse surgery, were younger and in significant better health condition (less hypertension and COPD), but showed a significantly higher POP-Q stage compared to women choosing pessary treatment. Our data indicate that women with higher POP-Q stage and non-smokers tended to decide for prolapse surgery. This information could help in clinical practice to guide patients for the best possible treatment decision and strengthen individual counselling.

Randomized controlled trial of silver-alloy-impregnated suprapubic catheters versus standard suprapubic catheters in assessing urinary tract infection rates in urogynecology patients

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common health-care-related infections. We aimed to compare the UTI rate among women undergoing urogynecological procedures with a silver-alloy suprapubic catheter (SPC) and a standard SPC, and identify the risk factors predisposing patients to UTI.

METHODS

Patients who were to undergo placement of an SPC as part of pelvic organ prolapse surgery were enrolled between 1 August 2011 and 30 August 2017, and randomized to either standard SPC or silver-alloy SPC. Follow-up was performed at a postoperative visit or via a phone call at 6 weeks. The primary outcome was UTI.

RESULTS

Of the 288 patients who were randomized, 127 with standard SPC and 137 with silver-alloy SPC were included in the analysis. Twenty-nine out of 123 women with standard SPC (23.6%) and 24 out of 131 (18.3%) with silver-alloy SPC were diagnosed with UTI within 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.30). In univariate analysis, non-white race (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% CI 1.16-24.73) and diabetes (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.26-6.23) were associated with increased risk of UTI. On multivariate analysis, only diabetes remained an independent risk factor. Comparisons between groups were evaluated using two-sample t test for age, Chi-squared tests for diabetes, and Wilcoxon rank sum test for all other variables.

CONCLUSION

There was only a 5% difference in 6-week UTI rates between those who received standard vs silver-alloy SPC; the study was not powered to detect such a small difference. Diabetes was identified as a risk factor for SPC-associated UTI in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgeries.

Are there any preventable risk factors for women who had surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and stress Urinary Incontinence?

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluates the preventable risk factors in symptomatic women with previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

Four hundred and one women previously operated were divided into two groups as; women operated for POP (325 cases) and women operated for SUI (76 cases). The control group consisted of 233 age and body mass index (BMI)-matched subject operated for benign gynecologic reasons and exhibited no evidence of POP or SUI. These groups were compared in terms of age, BMI, gravida, parity, mode of delivery, smoking status, menopause status and chronic diseases.

RESULTS

Grand_multiparity (parity ≥5) increased the risk of POP/SUI surgery and POP surgery 2.71 and 2.94 times, respectively (p=0.0003 and p=0.0001, respectively). Vaginal birth increased the risk of POP/SUI surgery 2.33 times (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Grand_multiparity increased the risk of POP/SUI surgery and POP surgery while vaginal birth increased the risk of POP/SUI surgery. Among them, particularly, grand_multiparity seem to be the only preventable risk factors.

Rectocele plication: description of a novel surgical technique and review of clinical results

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

A rectocele is the bulging of the anterior rectal wall into the posterior vaginal compartment. The route of surgical repair can be transvaginal, transrectal or abdominal. The aim of this retrospective study is to describe a novel transvaginal surgical procedure and investigate the associated subjective and objective clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Database records were retrieved for all women who underwent a rectocele plication for the period from January 2010 until December 2015 in a referral urogynecology unit with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. This transvaginal technique entails a plication of the anterior rectal wall by suturing of the rectal muscularis layer. Clinical findings and quality of life (QOL) metrics were evaluated and reported on.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine women met the initial inclusion criteria with full data available for 123. The presenting symptoms included a vaginal bulge in 73 (52.5%), overactive bladder (OAB) in 73 (52.5%), obstructed defecation (OD) in 49 (35.3%) and anal incontinence (AI) in 35 (25.2%). The majority of women (n = 72, 51.8%) had stage 3-4 posterior prolapse. The mean follow-up period was 27 ± 15 months. The postoperative symptoms were significantly improved for all, except AI (p = 0.43). There was a significant improvement in posterior prolapse (p < 0.001) with the majority of women noted to have a stage 0 or 1 (n = 109; 88.6%) posterior prolapse at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The rectocele plication is a novel surgical technique with good subjective and objective clinical outcomes in the medium term.

[Implants for genital prolapse : Contra mesh surgery]

Alloplastic transvaginal meshes have become very popular in the surgery of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) as did alloplastic suburethral slings in female stress incontinence surgery, but without adequate supporting data. The simplicity of the mesh procedure facilitates its propagation with acceptance of higher revision and complication rates. Since attending physicians do more and more prolapse surgeries without practicing or teaching alternative techniques, expertise in these alternatives, which might be very useful in cases of recurrence, persistence or complications, is permanently lost. It is doubtful that proper and detailed information about alternatives, risks, and benefits of transvaginal alloplastic meshes is provided to every single prolapse patient according to the recommendations of the German POP guidelines, since the number of implanted meshes exceeds the number of properly indicated mesh candidates by far. Although there is no dissent internationally about the available mesh data, thousands of lawsuits in the USA, insolvency of companies due to claims for compensation and unambiguous warnings from foreign urological societies leave German urogynecologists still unimpressed. The existing literature in pelvic organ prolapse exclusively focusses on POP stage and improvement of that stage with surgical therapy. Instead, typical prolapse symptoms should trigger therapy and improvement of these symptoms should be the utmost treatment goal. It is strongly recommended for liability reasons to obtain specific written informed consent.

Laparoscopic Promontofixation in 10 Steps

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic promontofixation has all the advantages of a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of urogenital prolapse. The standardization and description of the technique was the main objective of this video. We describe the complete procedure in 10 steps, which could help to understand and perform this procedure simply, easily, and safely.

DESIGN

Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique.

SETTING

A university tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with indication for the laparoscopic treatment of urogenital prolapse. The local institutional review board ruled that approval was not required for this video article.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ten main steps were identified and described in detail during laparoscopic promontofixation: step 1, exposition of the operating field; step 2, dissection of the promontory; step 3, pararectal dissection; step 4, rectovaginal dissection; step 5, vesicovaginal dissection; step 6, supracervical hysterectomy; step 7, fixation of the prosthesis; step 8, peritonization; step 9, fixing the prosthesis to the promontory; and step 10, uterine morcellation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic promontofixation is an effective technique for prolapse surgery. The 10 steps help to perform each part of the surgery in logical sequences, making the procedure faster to adopt and easy to learn. Standardization of laparoscopic techniques could help to reduce learning curve.

Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery.Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:99-107. [PMID: 28600758 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3372-x]

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to compare the functional outcomes after pessary treatment and after prolapse surgery as primary treatments for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study performed in a Dutch teaching hospital in women with symptomatic POP of stage II or higher requiring treatment. Patients were treated according to their preference with a pessary or prolapse surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-specific quality of life at 12 months follow-up according to the prolapse domain of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and additional interventions. To show a difference of ten points in the primary outcome, we needed to randomize 80 women (power 80%, α 0.05, taking 10% attrition into account).

RESULTS

We included 113 women (74 in the pessary group, 39 in the surgery group). After 12 months, the median prolapse domain score was 0 (10th to 90th percentile 0-33) in the pessary group and 0 (10th to 90th percentile 0-0) in the surgery group (p < 0.01). Differences in other domain scores were not statistically significant. In the pessary group, 28% (21/74) of the women had a surgical intervention versus 3% (1/39) reoperations in the surgery group (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with POP of stage II or higher undergoing surgery, prolapse symptoms were less severe than in those who were treated with a pessary, but 72% of women who were treated with a pessary did not opt for surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch trial register NTR2856.

Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: The "6-Points" Technique

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To illustrate laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse, a new method using a simplified mesh fixation technique, with only 6 fixing points.

DESIGN

Step-by-step explanation of the surgery using video (educative video). The video was approved by the local institutional review board.

SETTING

University Hospital of Strasbourg, France (Canadian Task Force Classification III).

PATIENTS

Women with multicompartment prolapse.

INTERVENTION

We first dissected the promontorium and vertically incise the posterior parietal peritoneum on the right pelvic sidewall up the pouch of Douglas. We then dissect the rectovaginal septum up to the anal cap, laterally exposing the puborectalis muscle on each side. Middle rectal vessels can be coagulated and cut without increasing the risk of digestive disorders (especially constipation), but it is preferable to conserve them if the space is sufficient for suture. Then, we dissect the vesicovaginal space and realized the subtotal hysterectomy. Finally, we realized the fastening of the anterior and posterior meshes. The particularity is that we performed only 6 points for fixing the meshes: 1 on the puborectalis muscle on each side without tension (to reduce the risk of mesh contracture, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain), 1 for the fixing of the anterior mesh on the anterior vaginal wall at the level of the bladder neck, and 1 on each side of the cervix for the reconstitution of the pericervical ring gathering together the anterior mesh, the pubocervical fascia, and the insertion of the uterosacral ligament at the level of the cervix and the posterior mesh. The sixth stitch fastened 1 of 2 meshes to the anterior paravertebral ligament at the level of the sacral promontory. We finished with the peritonization.

MAIN RESULTS

The duration of surgery lasts approximately 120 minutes in well-experienced hands. Based on our experience the 6-point technique was relatively simple (few laparoscopic stiches) with few operative difficulties and was also associated with a low rate of reintervention.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of middle compartment prolapse could be performed quickly and efficiently under laparoscopy with the "6-points" technique.

Assessing the use of the IUGA/ICS classification system for prosthesis/graft complications in publications from 2011 to 2015

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Complications of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence surgery have gained increasing attention from both lay media and medical societies. The International Urogynecological Association and International Continence Society proposed the category-time-site system to classify complications in 2011. Our objective is to assess the usage of the category-time-site system in the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and identified records using PubMed search terms "mesh" and "prolapse or incontinence" and "complication or excision" (February 2011 to December 2015) to select publications following the introduction of category-time-site system. Relevant publications were included and reviewed for study design, initial procedure, number of patients assigned codes, number of unique codes applied, purpose of assigning codes, and duration of clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 167 eligible records, 23 (14 %) used the system, 137 (82 %) used no system, and 7 (4 %) used another system. They included three study designs: randomized control trials, case reports, and case series. Given the very limited amount of data, no statistical tests were performed, but trends were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Fourteen percent of the reports in the literature describing complications related to prosthesis/graft use in pelvic surgery utilize the category-time-site system. The system's limited and inconsistent use hinders the ability to draw conclusions useful for clinical practice. Effort should be directed toward improving appropriate usage or revising the system to increase its exposure in related publications. An improved system will better prepare pelvic surgeons for assessing future generations of prostheses/grafts.

Synthetic Graft Augmentation in Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Long-Term Objective and Subjective Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term objectives and subjective outcomes in women who underwent prolapse surgery with a synthetic graft augmentation.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

University hospital in the southeastern United States.

PATIENTS

Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse who underwent transvaginal graft augmentation using the Prolift mesh system between July 2006 and December 2008 for a minimum 5-year follow-up.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ), and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Subjects also underwent postoperative physical examination with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and vaginal pain/stricture assessment. Long-term postoperative findings were compared with preoperative baseline data.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 208 eligible subjects, 70 completed the questionnaires only, and 48 of these 70 provided both postoperative examination and questionnaire data. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.0 ± 0.7 years (range, 5.8-8.1 years). POP-Q measurements of Ba (point B anterior), Bp (B posterior), C (cervix), GH (genital hiatus), PB (perineal body), and overall pelvic organ prolapse stage were significantly improved (all p < .001 except for PB, p = .006). PFIQ-7 (total, Urinary Impact Questionnaire, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire) and PFDI-20 (total, Urinary Distress Inventory, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory) scores significantly improved (all p < .001). No differences were noted in the colorectal-anal subscales (Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory) and PISQ scores at >5-year follow-up (all p > .05). Satisfaction rates were 15.7% for not at all, 35.7% for somewhat, and 48.6% for completely satisfied. Complications included graft exposure (n = 3; 6%) and dyspareunia (n = 25; 36%).

CONCLUSION

Women undergoing transvaginal prolapse surgery using a synthetic graft continue to have positive objective and subjective outcomes, leading to significantly improved quality of life at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

The value of the preoperative 1-h pad test with pessary insertion for predicting the need for a mid-urethral sling following pelvic prolapse surgery: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Part of the patients with pelvic organ prolapse but without symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may demonstrate SUI after prolapse surgery (occult SUI), and no optimal preoperative screening method is currently available for it. The aim of this study was to estimate the value of the preoperative 1-h pad test with pessary insertion for predicting the need for a mid-urethral sling (MUS) following prolapse surgery.

METHODS

Two hundred and six patients were enrolled for advanced prolapse without complaining of urinary incontinence (UI) in this prospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria included prior or concomitant anti-incontinence surgery. Preoperatively, a stress test, the 1-h pad test and uroflowmetry were performed with prolapse reduction. Primary outcome was postoperative de novo UI. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 12-48 months).

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients, 45 (21.8 %) had evidence of occult SUI preoperatively, 62 (30.1 %) exhibited de novo UI postoperatively, and only 13 (6.3 %) opted MUSs. Patients with occult SUI experienced higher de novo UI rate (53.3 vs. 23.6 %; P = 0.000). The OSUI and concomitant hysterectomy were identified as independent risk factors related to de novo UI (P = 0.000, P = 0.044). We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the value of preoperative 1-h pad test. The area under ROC curve was 0.816 ± 0.085 (95 % CI 0.649-0.983); the cutoff value was 1.9 g (sensitivity 80.0 %, specificity 83.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative 1-h pad test with prolapse reduction is feasible for screening occult SUI, and more than 1.9 g may be a practical indicator of a postoperative subsequent MUS.

Pain medication requirements after sacropexy and combination interventions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced morbidity, and postoperative pain is reduced. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative pain intensity, analgesic requirements, and the influence of cofactors after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.

METHODS

The study assessed 287 patients treated with laparoscopic sacropexy for genital prolapse with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade>1. Patients were asked to evaluate their pain postoperatively using a 4-point verbal pain rating scale. In addition, medical records were analyzed regarding the requirement for analgesic medication.

RESULTS

Patients distinguished between abdominal pain and shoulder pain after laparoscopy. Abdominal pain reached maximum severity on day 1 and showed a good response to nonsteroidal antiphlogistics, whereas shoulder pain was rarely found (6.27%). Of the patients, 38% required no pain treatment or required 1 dose at most. The need for pain medication reached its climax on day 1 and decreased during the 5 following days. Non-opioid analgesics provided a sufficient therapeutic effect.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic sacropexy is associated with a moderate degree of postoperative pain. Non-opioid analgesics should be preferred as first-line therapy. The typical shoulder-tip pain showed only a low prevalence in our study group. From our point of view, the low rate of shoulder-tip pain corresponded with the low intra-abdominal carbon dioxide pressure.