Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on management and outcomes in acute appendicitis: Should these new practices be the norm?

Background

In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered management of surgical patients globally. International guidelines recommended that non-operative management be implemented wherever possible (e.g. in proven uncomplicated appendicitis) to reduce pressure on healthcare services and reduce risk of peri-operative viral transmission. We sought to compare our management and outcomes of appendicitis during lockdown vs a non-pandemic period.

Methods

All presentations to our department with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis between 12/03/2020 and 30/06/2020 were compared to the same 110-day period in 2019. Quantity and severity of presentations, use of radiological investigations, rate of operative intervention and histopathological findings were variables collected for comparison.

Results

There was a reduction in appendicitis presentations (from 74 to 56 cases), and an increase in radiological imaging (from 70.27% to 89.29%) (P = 0.007) from 2019 to 2020. In 2019, 93.24% of patients had appendicectomy, compared to 71.42% in 2020(P < 0.001). This decrease was most pronounced in uncomplicated cases, whose operative rates dropped from 90.32% to 62.5% (P = 0.009). Post-operative histology confirmed appendicitis in 73.9% in 2019, compared to 97.5% in 2020 (P = 0.001). Normal appendiceal pathology was reported for 17 cases (24.64%) in 2019, compared to none in 2020 (P < 0.001) – a 0% negative appendicectomy rate (NAR).

Discussion

The 0% NAR in 2020 is due to a combination of increased CT imaging, a higher threshold to operate, and is impacted by increased disease severity due to delayed patient presentation. This study adds to growing literature promoting routine use of radiological imaging to confirm appendicitis diagnosis. As we enter a second lockdown, patients should be encouraged to avoid late presentations, and surgical departments should continue using radiological imaging more liberally in guiding appendicitis management.

Negative appendicectomy rates as a quality measure in a regional surgical unit: a retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

Historically, high negative appendicectomy rates (NAR) were acceptable to offset the risks of perforation, previously exceeding 20%. With improved imaging and clinical scoring algorithms, there is growing demand for lower negative appendicectomy rates. The objectives were to (1) establish the NAR in our institution and (2) correlate clinical parameters and imaging modalities with histological findings.

METHODS

Patients undergoing an appendicectomy between January 2012 and June 2018 were identified using a prospectively maintained pathology database. Histology findings were cross referenced against our radiology system, and anonymised data was collected for gender, age, WCC, Neutrophil and CRP level.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-three percent were males (n = 610), with 81% (n = 933) of histology reports classified as appendicitis. Sixty patients had a histologically normal appendix equating to a 5.2% NAR. If lymphoid hyperplasia, fibrosis and atrophy are included, it equates to a NAR of 14.57%. (p < 0.0001). Sixty-six percent of patients had no pre-operative imaging. CT imaging demonstrated a higher sensitivity (93.33%) and positive predictive value (99.60%) compared to ultrasonography. WCC and CRP are statistically significant in predicting appendicitis (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is no consensus on defining a negative appendicectomy or for imaging modality utilisation. CT imaging is the most sensitive and should be used in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. A standardised algorithm regarding the workup of patients with RIF pain along with a consensus on the use of imaging will further reduce negative appendicectomy rates.