A validated single-cell-based strategy to identify diagnostic and therapeutic targets in complex diseases

Background

Genomic medicine has paved the way for identifying biomarkers and therapeutically actionable targets for complex diseases, but is complicated by the involvement of thousands of variably expressed genes across multiple cell types. Single-cell RNA-sequencing study (scRNA-seq) allows the characterization of such complex changes in whole organs.

Methods

The study is based on applying network tools to organize and analyze scRNA-seq data from a mouse model of arthritis and human rheumatoid arthritis, in order to find diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Diagnostic validation studies were performed using expression profiling data and potential protein biomarkers from prospective clinical studies of 13 diseases. A candidate drug was examined by a treatment study of a mouse model of arthritis, using phenotypic, immunohistochemical, and cellular analyses as read-outs.

Results

We performed the first systematic analysis of pathways, potential biomarkers, and drug targets in scRNA-seq data from a complex disease, starting with inflamed joints and lymph nodes from a mouse model of arthritis. We found the involvement of hundreds of pathways, biomarkers, and drug targets that differed greatly between cell types. Analyses of scRNA-seq and GWAS data from human rheumatoid arthritis (RA) supported a similar dispersion of pathogenic mechanisms in different cell types. Thus, systems-level approaches to prioritize biomarkers and drugs are needed. Here, we present a prioritization strategy that is based on constructing network models of disease-associated cell types and interactions using scRNA-seq data from our mouse model of arthritis, as well as human RA, which we term multicellular disease models (MCDMs). We find that the network centrality of MCDM cell types correlates with the enrichment of genes harboring genetic variants associated with RA and thus could potentially be used to prioritize cell types and genes for diagnostics and therapeutics. We validated this hypothesis in a large-scale study of patients with 13 different autoimmune, allergic, infectious, malignant, endocrine, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as a therapeutic study of the mouse arthritis model.

Conclusions

Overall, our results support that our strategy has the potential to help prioritize diagnostic and therapeutic targets in human disease.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-019-0657-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Network Tools for the Analysis of Proteomic Data

Recent advancements in high-throughput technologies such as mass spectrometry have led to an increase in the rate at which data is generated and accumulated. As a result, standard statistical methods no longer suffice as a way of analyzing such gigantic amounts of data. Network analysis, the evaluation of how nodes relate to one another, has over the years become an integral tool for analyzing high throughput proteomic data as they provide a structure that helps reduce the complexity of the underlying data.Computational tools, including pathway databases and network building tools, have therefore been developed to store, analyze, interpret, and learn from proteomics data. These tools enable the visualization of proteins as networks of signaling, regulatory, and biochemical interactions. In this chapter, we provide an overview of networks and network theory fundamentals for the analysis of proteomics data. We further provide an overview of interaction databases and network tools which are frequently used for analyzing proteomics data.