Cranioorbital Pretemporal Skull Base Approach with Anterior Clinoidectomy for Removal of Large Left Clinoid Meningioma: "Unwrapping" Encircled Internal Carotid Artery and Decompressing Optic Nerve: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Clinoidal meningiomas are meningiomas arising from or in the vicinity of the anterior clinoid process.1 Despite advanced microsurgical techniques, clinoidal meningiomas remain challenging.2 Extradural anterior clinoidectomy with optical unroofing remains an important tool in skull base surgery, which provides a safe operative corridor, facilitating greater extent of resection and enhancing overall outcome, particularly visual function.2-13 A 66-year-old woman presented with history of visual disturbances. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a dural-based tumor consistent with a large left clinoidal meningioma, with tumor wrapping (encircling) around the left trunk and internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation, elevating the left middle cerebral artery M1 segment, and invading the left optic canal. Left cranio-orbital craniotomy with pretemporal exposure was used (Video 1).1,9 A high-speed diamond drill with irrigation completed the extradural anterior clinoidectomy and optical canal unroofing. Use of a 1-mm Kerrison rongeur should be done with utmost care. The tumor was unwrapped via meticulous piecemeal removal. Final dissection and ICA unwrapping was done when the tumor was debulked enough that dissecting it off the artery was safe and under less tension. Due to its obscurity, final decompression of the left optic nerve with incision and opening of the falciform ligament was performed at the end of the procedure.10 Postoperative neuro-ophthalmologic examination showed a grossly unchanged left visual field with some visual acuity improvement. Resection of tumor encircling the ICA has been described previously;14 however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first video describing removal of a tumor surrounding the ICA (perfomed by senior author K.I.A.), essentially "unwrapping" the left ICA trunk and its bifurcation. The patient consented to publication.

Visual-evoked potential predicts the efficacy of the optical canal decompression for traumatic optic nerve neuropathy showing blindness: A case report

Background

The indication for surgical optic canal decompression (OCD) for traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) remains controversial because there is no reliable predictor of a good outcome. We report the case of a blind patient with TON whose remaining visual-evoked potential (VEP) suggested recovery potential of the injured optic nerve after OCD.

Case Description

A 48-year-old man had fallen from a height of 7 m, striking his head. He immediately complained of right-eye blindness. He had no light perception and the direct light reflex disappeared from the right pupil, although there was no fracture or traumatic lesion on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Because the amplitude of the VEP with the right eye stimulation remained unchanged, we performed the right OCD. During surgical OCD, the amplitude and latency of VEP began to improve. Finally, the visual field improved in almost all directions, and eyesight improved to 0.2.

Conclusion

The retained VEP activity in TON may suggest the recovery potential of the injured optic nerve, even in cases of blindness. It is possible that VEP is an indicator of aggressive treatment for TON such as OCD.

Optic Canal Decompression: Concepts and Techniques: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

The optic canal (OC) is a bony channel that transmits the optic nerve (ON) and ophthalmic artery (OphA) as they course through the lesser wing of the sphenoid bone to the orbital apex. The OC is involved in a variety of intracranial and extracranial pathologies,1 and opening of the canal may be necessary in order to achieve adequate exposure, better disease control, and vision preservation.2 Depending on the location of the pathology and its relationship with the optic nerve, the OC may be decompressed through an open transcranial approach or an endoscopic endonasal approach.1,3 OC drilling can be tailored based on the location of the pathology and its extension. Anterior clinoid process and optic strut drilling can be added based on these factors as well.4,5 In this video, we demonstrate the steps of OC drilling in both transcranial microscopic and endoscopic endonasal approaches through a combination of animated illustrations and operative videos. We present 4 cases, including 2 transcranial microscopic and 2 endoscopic endonasal approaches,6 demonstrating OC decompression and its technical nuances. Each case was selected to represent the range of pathologies relevant to OC drilling to allow for a complete understanding of the techniques and concepts required for optimal treatment. An informed written consent has been obtained from each of the patients in this publication. Video © Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. Copyright information: Bendok BR, Abi-Aad KR, Sattur MG, Welz ME, Hoxworth JM, Lal D. Endoscopic resection of a paraclinoid meningioma extending into the optic canal: 2-dimensional operative video. Operative Neurosurgery. 2018 September 1;15(3):356 by permission of Oxford University Press. Cadaveric images provided by courtesy of: The Rhoton Collection. http://rhoton.ineurodb.org/.

Combination analysis on the impact of the initial vision and surgical time for the prognosis of indirect traumatic optic neuropathy after endoscopic transnasal optic canal decompression

To analyze the impact of the initial vision and surgical time for endoscopic transnasal/transethmosphenoid optic canal decompression (ETOCD) in the treatment of indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (TON). This retrospective case series analysis included 72 patients with indirect TON who underwent ETOCD from August 2017 to May 2019. Visual acuity (VA) was compared before and after surgery to estimate the improvement rate. The overall VA improvement rate of ETOCD was 54.2%. There were 83.3% and 33.3% improvement rate of patients with residual vision and blindness, respectively. VA was improved in 60.9% of patients treated within 3 days, 61.5% treated within 7 days, and 35.0% treated later than 7 days. Of the blindness patients, 50.0%, 37.5%, and 0.0% were treated within 3 days, 3-7 days, and later than 7 days, respectively. Of patients with residual vision, 85.7%, 92.3%, and 70.0% were treated within 3 days, 3-7 days, and later than 7 days, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between patients with residual vision and those with blindness (P < 0.01), as well as between patients who received ETOCD within 7 days and those who received ETOCD later than 7 days (P = 0.043). The improvement rate of blindness patients managed within 3 days (P = 0.008) and 3-7 days (P = 0.035) was significantly higher than that for patients managed beyond 7 days. Indirect TON patients can directly benefit from ETOCD, and patients with residual vision have better improvement rates. ETOCD should be performed as soon as possible to salvage the patient's VA, especially within the first 7 days. For blindness patients, it is necessary to carry out the surgery within 7 days with increased benefit seen before 3 days.

An evolving perspective of endoscopic transnasal optic canal decompression for traumatic optic neuropathy in clinic

Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is a serious complication of craniofacial trauma, which damages the optic nerve indirectly and leads to dysfunction of visual acuity. The clinical intervention for a patient with TON includes optic canal decompression (with or without steroids), treatment with corticosteroids alone, or observation only. Currently, there is a controversy among clinicians as to which treatment is optimal. An increasing number of retrospective studies have unveiled that patients could experience significant improvement in visual acuity after optic canal decompression surgery, particularly endoscopic transnasal/transethmosphenoid optic canal decompression (ETOCD), either with or without corticosteroids. In this review, we discuss the evolving perspective on surgical treatment, specifically ETOCD, for the management of patients with TON and focus mainly on the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and resulting prognosis in the clinic.

Is prophylactic decompression of the optic canal necessary in surgical correction of fronto-orbital fibrous dysplasia?: a review of 11 consecutive cases

Fronto-orbital fibrous dysplasia is a disease characterized by frontal bossing and orbital dystopia. Simultaneous, prophylactic optic canal decompression remains controversial in the surgical correction of this condition. The authors review a series of 11 patients with fronto-orbital fibrous dysplasia. All patients underwent intracranial malformation excision. Concomitant optic canal decompression was carried out in 6 of 11 cases. Simultaneous reconstruction was carried out using autologous bone in all cases except for 1. Esthetic morphological satisfaction was obtained in all 11 cases. In 2 of 6 cases with optic canal decompression, 1 exhibited half-blindness, and the other exhibited quarter-blindness postoperatively. In 5 cases without decompression, there have been no changes in visual acuity through follow-up ranging from 5 to 22 years. Although therapeutic decompression is well accepted, prophylactic decompression is controversial and the efficacy of prophylactic decompression is questionable. Current strategies should focus on esthetic improvement, with careful observation carried out to assess for optic canal encroachment without prophylactic decompression.