Communication between physicians, patients, their companions and other healthcare professionals in home medical care in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To examine communication in home medical care.

METHODS

Conversations that happened during home medical care involving physicians at nine clinics were recorded and analyzed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Additional categories were developed to code aspects of home medical care.

RESULTS

Overall, 55 conversations were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 82.9 ± 10.1 years old. The most common triad was physician, patient, and patient's companion. Information about home medical care professionals who were not present during the conversation was provided by the physician in 21 cases (38.2%), the patient in nine cases (16.4%), and companions in 21 (39.6%) cases.

CONCLUSION

In home medical care, the participants mentioned home medical care professions who were not present at the time, suggesting that these conversations may have facilitated interprofessional collaboration.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Physicians should be aware that during home medical care, the presence of multiple attendants and other medical professionals contributing to communicate with the patient.

Patient-physician communication about cancer-related fatigue: a survey of patient-perceived barriers

PURPOSE

Cancer-related fatigue is a subjective, distressing, and common sequela of cancer which is often disregarded and underdiagnosed. Fatigue is assessed by self-report requiring communication between patient and physician. In this study, we investigated the patients' perspective on the patient-physician communication about fatigue.

METHODS

On average five months after diagnosis 1179 cancer patients, recruited in Germany, completed a survey as part of the LIFT project. The survey included questions on sociodemographic data, fatigue, depression, fatigue management, patient-physician communication, and communication barriers. Data were analyzed descriptively and using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Half of the participants reported that their physician had never asked them whether they felt exhausted. Patients undergoing chemo-, radio-, or immunotherapy were more likely to be asked about fatigue, while older age and major depression decreased the likelihood. Sixty-four percent of the patients felt impeded by communication barriers. Common barriers were not knowing who to turn to for fatigue (39%), time constraints (31%), and the fear of being perceived as weak (22%). Almost half of the participants indicated that their physicians were not appreciative and did not deal adequately with fatigue-related questions.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed gaps in the patient-physician communication regarding cancer-related fatigue. Contrary to guideline recommendations a minority of physicians addressed fatigue. On the other hand, cancer patients felt reluctant to bring up this topic due to structural barriers and fears. Physicians should routinely address fatigue and adopt a communication style which encourages patients to likewise state their symptoms and raise their questions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04921644. Registered in June 2021.

Patient-Physician Communication and Perception of Treatment Goals in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Online Survey of Patients and Physicians

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate patient-physician communication and patients' understanding of treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey of patients with RA and physicians treating RA was conducted between 16 and 30 June 2021. Participants were asked to rate the importance of 17 goals on a 6-point Likert scale, and mean scores were compared between patients and physicians by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Patients' satisfaction with physician communication and their understanding of treatment goals were also assessed.

RESULTS

The responses of 502 patients and 216 physicians were analyzed. The most common patient age group was 50-59 years (28.5%), and the mean disease duration was 10.3 years. Physicians had a mean of 19.2 years of treatment experience and were treating a mean of 44.3 patients. Among the 17 goals assessed, patients placed significantly more importance on drug tapering or discontinuation as short-term goals (3-6 months) and on performing basic activities of daily living, being able to engage in daily tasks, achieving and maintaining remission, maintaining better laboratory values, and drug tapering or discontinuation as long-term goals (5-10 years; all adjusted p < 0.05). Patient treatment satisfaction was significantly associated with disease activity, a feeling of treatment effectiveness, satisfaction with physician communication, and agreement with physician goals.

CONCLUSION

Differences exist among patients with RA and physicians treating RA regarding the importance of short- and long-term treatment goals. Good patient-physician communication appears to be important for improving patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network identifier: UMIN000044463.

Deaf Health Pathway - Immersing Medical Students in the Cultural and Language Aspects of Deaf Health

Language and cultural-concordant healthcare providers improve health outcomes for deaf patients, yet training opportunities are lacking. The Deaf Health Pathway was developed to train medical students on cultural humility and communication in American Sign Language to better connect with deaf community members and bridge the gap in their healthcare.

Electronic Screening, Feedback, and Clinician Training in Adolescent Primary Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to test the effects of an electronic screening and feedback tool and training for primary care clinicians on care and adolescent health behaviors.

METHODS

We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with six clinics randomly assigned to sequential crossover from control to intervention periods with clinician training between periods. Adolescents (ages 13-18) with a well visit during the control periods (n = 135) received usual care, while adolescents during the intervention periods (n = 167) received the electronic screening and feedback tool prior to their well visit, with results sent to their clinicians. Adolescents completed surveys at baseline, 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine associations between outcomes and treatment, controlling for time as a fixed effect and clinic as a random effect. All analyses employed intent-to-treat analyses and utilized multiple imputations for missing data.

RESULTS

Adolescents who received the intervention had a higher rate of counseling for their endorsed risk behaviors during the well visit (45% vs. 33%, Wald's T = 2.29, p = .02). There were no significant intervention effects on adolescent satisfaction with the clinician or perception of patient centeredness. The intervention was associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in overall risk score relative to control at 3 months (-.63, 95% confidence interval [-1.07, -.19], Cohen's d = .21), but not at 6 or 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that electronic screening and feedback may be associated with small reductions in risk behaviors at 3 months but that changes do not persist at longer term follow-up.

Understanding and Minimising Injection-Site Pain Following Subcutaneous Administration of Biologics: A Narrative Review

Injection-site pain (ISP) is a subjective side effect that is commonly reported with the subcutaneous administration of biological agents, yet it may only be a concern to some. Multiple factors related to the product formulation, such as pH, volume and excipients, and/or to the injection process have the potential to contribute to ISP, while patient-related factors, such as low body weight, gender and age, can make an individual more susceptible to experiencing ISP. While total elimination of ISP remains unlikely with any subcutaneously administered agent, it can be minimised by helping the patient to develop a confident and competent injection technique via robust and effective training. Careful management of patient expectations along with open discussion regarding the potential risk of ISP may serve to minimise treatment-related anxieties and, importantly, allow the patient to remain in control of his/her treatment. Other interventions to help minimise ISP include psychological interventions, allowing biologics to reach room temperature prior to injection, using the most suitable injection device for the individual patient and selecting an alternative drug formulation, when available. Productive patient–physician communication remains important in order to support and optimise treatment experience and adherence, while also providing the opportunity for patients to discuss any ISP-related issues.

Measuring the quality of patient-physician communication

Patient-physician communication is an often overlooked yet a very important aspect of providing medical care. Positive patient-physician quality of communication within discourse has an influence on various aspects of a consultation such as a patient's treatment adherence to prescribed medical regimen and their medical care outcome. As few reference standards exist for exploring semantics within the patient-physician setting and its effects on personalized healthcare, this paper presents a study exploring three methods to capture, model and evaluate patient-physician communication among three distinct data-sources. We introduce, compare and contrast these methods for capturing and modeling patient-physician communication quality using relatedness between discourse content within a given consultation. Results are shown for all three data-sources and communication quality scores among physicians recorded. We found our models demonstrate the ability to capture positive communication quality between both participants within a consultation. We also evaluate these findings against self-reported questionnaires highlighting various aspects of the consultation and rank communication quality among seventeen physicians who consulted amid one-hundred and thirty-two patients.

Things left unsaid: important topics that are not discussed between patients with systemic sclerosis, their carers and their healthcare professionals-a discourse analysis

Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare condition that can be complicated by interstitial lung fibrosis (SSc-ILD)—a major cause of mortality. This study explored information and communication needs of patients with SSc-ILD and their carers to understand what they are and whether they are met.

Methods

Qualitative research was performed, including in-depth individual interviews and observed conversations between pairs of patients, physicians and nurses, and between patients and physicians discussing experiences of SSc-ILD. The study was performed in Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA. Participants included 42 SSc-treating physicians, 21 patients with diagnosed SSc-ILD, 16 specialist nurses and five carers.

Results

Prognosis and mortality were the main unspoken topics acknowledged by patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Patients and carers felt afraid to ask physicians about mortality, and most physicians reported avoiding the question because their duty was to give patients hope and avoid causing additional distress. Patients often felt unable to ask physicians about relationships, family and work because of time constraints or because they felt these were not topics physicians would be concerned about. Often, specialist nurses felt that they had insufficient knowledge to provide adequate support.

Conclusion

Key topics, including mortality and prognosis, are rarely openly discussed, leaving patients uncertain and anxious about the future. By communicating about difficult but important topics, physicians and nurses could help patients and carers manage and plan their lives. This study shows that a multi-professional team-based communication approach is likely to better address patient needs and priorities.

Key Points

• Key topics in SSc or SSc-ILD, such as mortality and prognosis, are rarely openly discussed in clinical consultations.

• By communicating difficult but important topics, physicians and nurses could help patients manage their disease and plan their lives.

• A multi-professional team-based communication approach is likely to better address patient needs and priorities and could be easily implemented without the need for significant additional resources.

Discourse Features Among Providers, Patients, and Companions and Their Effect on Outcomes of Dementia Diagnosis Disclosure

OBJECTIVES

Receiving a diagnosis of dementia has major implications. Although protocols for disclosing difficult information have been developed for other health conditions, no such evidence-based method exists for dementia. As a step toward that goal, this study analyzed the discourse within dementia diagnosis disclosure sessions to identify conversational features associated with psychological outcomes.

METHOD

The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) was used to code the discourse among patients, their companions, and providers during 84 dementia diagnosis disclosure sessions following an initial evaluation at an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center.

RESULTS

Providers dominated the conversation in terms of overall time spent talking. With more severe dementia, patients spoke less and companions spoke more. Provider-positive rapport building was associated with lower patient depression and anxiety following the disclosure session. Patient-positive rapport building was associated with higher companion anxiety, but only when the patient was not suspected to have dementia. No associations were found between other types of discourse and patient or companion psychological outcomes.

DISCUSSION

A relatively small amount of positive rapport building by providers can lead to reduced distress following dementia disclosure. Dementia disclosure best practices should emphasize patient-centered communication techniques in order to minimize psychological distress following diagnosis.

What do measures of patient satisfaction with the doctor tell us?

OBJECTIVE

To gain an understanding of how patient satisfaction (PS) with the doctor (PSD) is conceptualized through an empirical review of how it is currently being measured. The content of PS questionnaire items was examined to (a) determine the primary domains underlying PSD, and (b) summarize the specific doctor-related characteristics and behaviors, and patient-related perceptions, composing each domain.

METHODS

A scoping review of empirical articles that assessed PSD published from 2000 to November 2013. MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1726 articles, 316 of which fulfilled study inclusion criteria. PSD was realized in one of four health contexts, with questions being embedded in a larger questionnaire that assessed PS with either: (1) overall healthcare, (2) a specific medical encounter, or (3) the healthcare team. In the fourth context, PSD was the questionnaire's sole focus. Five broad domains underlying PSD were revealed: (1) Communication Attributes; (2) Relational Conduct; (3) Technical Skill/Knowledge; (4) Personal Qualities; and (5) Availability/Accessibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful consideration of measurement goals and purposes is necessary when selecting a PSD measure.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The five emergent domains underlying PSD point to potential key areas of physician training and foci for quality assessment.

Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening

The impact of patient-physician communication on subsequent patient behavior has rarely been evaluated in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions. We describe physicians' use of persuasive techniques when recommending CRC screening and evaluate its association with patients' subsequent adherence to screening. Audio recordings of N = 414 periodic health examinations were joined with screening use data from electronic medical records and pre-/post-visit patient surveys. The association between persuasion and screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. According to observer ratings, primary care physicians frequently use persuasive techniques (63 %) when recommending CRC screening, most commonly argument or refutation. However, physician persuasion was not associated with subsequent screening adherence. Physician use of persuasion may be a common vehicle for information provision during CRC screening discussions; however, our results do not support the sole reliance on persuasive techniques if the goal is to improve adherence to recommended screening.

Emotional personality/proximity versus emotional authenticity in patient-physician communication in healthy study participants, and in patients with benign breast disease, and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland

BACKGROUND/AIM

The associations between emotional personality, proximity and authenticity in patient-physician communication during breast cancer (BC) consultations are rarely considered together in a prospective study. We, therefore, investigated emotional personality/proximity versus authenticity in patient-physician communication in healthy study subjects (HSS) and in patients with benign breast disease (BBD) and breast cancer (BC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the Kuopio Breast Cancer Study, 115 women with breast symptoms were evaluated regarding emotional personality, proximity and authenticity in their a patient-physician communication before any diagnostic procedures were carried-out.

RESULTS

The emotional personality and the emotional proximity in patient-physician communication was highly significantly positively correlated in the BBD group. The kappa-values for emotional personality versus emotional proximity in the HSS, BBD and BC groups were statistically significant. There was also a highly significant positive correlation between emotional personality and emotional authenticity in the HSS, BBD and BC groups and the kappa values in the HSS, BBD and BC groups were statistically significant. There was a highly significant positive correlation between emotional proximity and emotional authenticity in the BBD group, and the weighted kappa-values in the BBD group were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study support a powerful link between emotional personality/proximity and emotional authenticity, and provides new information in patient-physician communication in the HSS, BBD and BC groups. This finding is of clinical importance, since during breast disease consultation, barriers to patient-physician communication may be associated with difficulties in early BC diagnosis in the breast cancer diagnostic unit.

Physician gender and patient centered communication: the moderating effect of psychosocial and biomedical case characteristics

OBJECTIVE

Female physicians have a more patient-centered communication style than their male counterparts; however, few studies have investigated how the biomedical or psychosocial nature of a patient diagnosis might moderate this relationship.

METHODS

Seventy six 3rd year residents (50 male and 26 females) seeking board certification from the Korean Academy of Family Medicine participated in the 2013 Clinical Practice Examination by conducting two simulated patient (SP) interviews, one presenting a largely psychosocial case and the other largely biomedical. The interview recordings were coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS).

RESULTS

Female physicians and their SPs engaged in more dialog than male physicians in both cases. Female physicians were more patient-centered than males for the psychosocial case (t = -3.24, P < 0.05), however, their scores did not differ for the biomedical case. In multivariate analysis, a significant interaction between physician gender and case (z = -3.90, P < 0.001) similarly demonstrated greater female patient-centeredness only for the predominantly psychosocial case.

CONCLUSION

Case characteristics moderated the association between physician gender and patient-centeredness.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Case characteristics need to be considered in future research on the association of physician gender and the patient-centered communication, as well as in the tailoring of physician communication training.

Patient-reported frequency, awareness and patient-physician communication of hypoglycaemia in Belgium

OBJECTIVES

Limited data exist on the frequency of non-severe hypoglycaemic events in patients with insulin-treated diabetes outside of clinical trial settings. Our study investigated the rates of self-reported non-severe events in a sample of Belgian patients. We also investigated self-reported awareness of the symptoms of hypoglycaemia and communication about hypoglycaemia between patients and their physicians.

METHODS

Patients aged >15 years with Type 1 (T1DM) and insulin-treated Type 2 (T2DM) diabetes were recruited via existing panels in Belgium to complete four questionnaires at weekly intervals. In addition to demographics, data on frequency of non-severe hypoglycaemic events (7-day recall), severe hypoglycaemic events (1-year recall), awareness of hypoglycaemia and reporting of hypoglycaemia to physicians were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 412 patients (44% T1DM, 56% T2DM) completed 1148 patient-week records. Mean insulin-treatment duration was 11 years, mean HbA(1c) 7·7%. Mean reported non-severe hypoglycaemic events per patient-week were 2·3 in T1DM patients, 0·3 in T2DM patients receiving basal-only therapy, 0·7 in T2DM patients receiving basal-bolus therapy and 0·8 in T2DM patients receiving another form of insulin. Mean reported annual frequencies of severe hypoglycaemic events were 0·9 in T1DM and 0·4 in T2DM. Impaired awareness or unawareness of hypoglycaemia was reported by 70% of T1DM patients, 55% of T2DM patients receiving basal-only therapy, 61% of T2DM patients receiving basal-bolus therapy and 73% of T2DM patients receiving another form of insulin. Overall, 60% of T1DM patients and 46% of T2DM patients rarely/never discuss hypoglycaemia with their GP/specialist. In addition, 10% of T1DM patients and 13% of T2DM patients stated that GPs/specialists did not ask them about their hypoglycaemia in routine appointments.

CONCLUSION

Hypoglycaemic events and unawareness of these events are common in Belgian insulin-treated diabetes patients. Patients often fail to report hypoglycaemic events to their physician and many physicians do not inquire about hypoglycaemia, meaning the current burden of hypoglycaemic events may be underestimated.

Temporal characteristics of decisions in hospital encounters: a threshold for shared decision making? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To identify and characterize physicians' statements that contained evidence of clinically relevant decisions in encounters with patients in different hospital settings.

METHODS

Qualitative analysis of 50 videotaped encounters from wards, the emergency room (ER) and outpatient clinics in a department of internal medicine at a Norwegian university hospital.

RESULTS

Clinical decisions could be grouped in a temporal order: decisions which had already been made, and were brought into the encounter by the physician (preformed decisions), decisions made in the present (here-and-now decisions), and decisions prescribing future actions given a certain course of events (conditional decisions). Preformed decisions were a hallmark in the ward and conditional decisions a main feature of ER encounters.

CONCLUSION

Clinical decisions related to a patient-physician encounter spanned a time frame exceeding the duration of the encounter. While a distribution of decisions over time and space fosters sharing and dilution of responsibility between providers, it makes the decision making process hard to access for patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

In order to plan when and how to involve patients in decisions, physicians need increased awareness of when clinical decisions are made, who usually makes them, and who should make them.

Talking about depression: an analogue study of physician gender and communication style on patient disclosures

OBJECTIVES

To disentangle the effects of physician gender and patient-centered communication style on patients' oral engagement in depression care.

METHODS

Physician gender, physician race and communication style (high patient-centered (HPC) and low patient-centered (LPC)) were manipulated and presented as videotaped actors within a computer simulated medical visit to assess effects on analogue patient (AP) verbal responsiveness and care ratings. 307 APs (56% female; 70% African American) were randomly assigned to conditions and instructed to verbally respond to depression-related questions and indicate willingness to continue care. Disclosures were coded using Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS).

RESULTS

Both male and female APs talked more overall and conveyed more psychosocial and emotional talk to HPC gender discordant doctors (all p<.05). APs were more willing to continue treatment with gender-discordant HPC physicians (p<.05). No effects were evident in the LPC condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight a role for physician gender when considering active patient engagement in patient-centered depression care. This pattern suggests that there may be largely under-appreciated and consequential effects associated with patient expectations in regard to physician gender that these differ by patient gender.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

High patient-centeredness increases active patient engagement in depression care especially in gender discordant dyads.

"Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine using audio-recorded encounters the extent and process of companion participation when discussing treatment choices and prognosis in the context of a life-limiting cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

Qualitative analysis of transcribed outpatient visits between 17 oncologists, 49 patients with advanced cancer, and 34 companions.

RESULTS

46 qualifying companion statements were collected from a total of 28 conversations about treatment choices or prognosis. We identified a range of companion positions, from "pseudo-surrogacy" (companion speaking as if the patient were not able to speak for himself), "hearsay", "conflation of thoughts", "co-experiencing", "observation as an outsider", and "facilitation". Statements made by companions were infrequently directly validated by the patient.

CONCLUSION

Companions often spoke on behalf of patients during discussions of prognosis and treatment choices, even when the patient was present and capable of speaking on his or her own behalf.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The conversational role of companions as well as whether the physician checks with the patient can determine whether a companion facilitates or inhibits patient autonomy and involvement. Physicians can reduce ambiguity and encourage patient participation by being aware of when and how companions may speak on behalf of patients and by corroborating the companion's statement with the patient.

A novel analytical strategy for patient-physician communication research: the one-with-many design

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to demonstrate how a novel analytic strategy - the one-with-many (OWM) design - can provide unique information about patient-physician communication that cannot be obtained using traditional analytic strategies.

METHODS

Using an OWM design we conducted a secondary analysis of behavioral (talk time) and self-reported (perceived teamness) data from a study of patient-physician communication, and examined variance decompositions of these variables.

RESULTS

Talk time was largely relational, suggesting that there is no behavioral consistency on the part of physicians across patients or behavioral similarity among patients who see the same physician. In contrast, there was significant actor variance in perceived teamness, suggesting that some physicians consistently reported higher teamness with their patients than others. However, those physicians' positive perceptions of the communication are not necessarily reciprocated by their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OWM design provides researchers with the opportunity to take full advantage of rich non-independent data and explore interesting communication patterns (e.g., behavioral continuity, similarity, reciprocity unique to specific dyads) that have been omitted in prior literature.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

OWM can be used to determine the relative differences in how patients and physicians influence communication patterns and identify which aspects of physician-patient communication are relational and which are not.

Contribution of emotional distance and reserve in patient-physician communication in healthy study patients, and in patients with benign breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland

AIM

Emotionally-restricted and 'poor-understanding'communication between a patient and their physician may be associated with difficulties in diagnosis and with poor treatment results in clinical practice. To our knowledge, the associations between distance and reserve in patient-physician communication and the risk of breast cancer (BC) are rarely considered together in a prospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In an extension of the Kuopio Breast Cancer Study, 115 women with breast symptoms were evaluated for emotional distance and reservation in patient-physician communication before any diagnostic procedures were carried out.

RESULTS

Clinical examination and biopsy showed BC in 34 patients, benign breast disease (BBD) in 53 patients, while 28 individuals were shown to be healthy (HSS). There was a trend for the BC group to report more emotional distance in patient-physician communication (30/34, 89.0%; grade I to IV emotional distance) than the patients in the HSS and BBD groups (78.6% and 75.5%, grade I to IV emotional distance, respectively). However, the mean of the distance score for HSS, BBD and BC groups differed only slightly in grade II and grade III. The BC group had a higher ERS emotional reservation score in contact (25/34, 73.5%; grade I to IV reserve) than the patients in the HSS and BBD groups (57.1% and 62.1%, grade I to IV reserve, respectively). However, the mean of the reserve score for HSS, BBD and BC groups differed only slightly in grade II, grade III and grade IV.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that patients with BC could be at risk for emotional distance and reserve in patient-physician communication and this should be taken into account in the relationship between the patient and their physician and may have clinical relevance in day-to-day clinical work.

Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening

OBJECTIVE

The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use.

METHODS

Audio-recordings of n=443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR=2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.

What happens after a request for euthanasia is refused? Qualitative interviews with patients, relatives and physicians

OBJECTIVE

Obtaining in-depth information from both patient and physician perspectives about what happens after a request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) is refused.

METHODS

In-depth interviews with nine patients whose EAS request was refused and seven physicians of these patients, and with three relatives of patients who had died after a request was refused and four physicians of these patients. Interviews were conducted at least 6 months after the refusal.

RESULTS

A wish to die remained in all patients after refusal, although it sometimes diminished. In most cases patient and physician stopped discussing this wish, and none of the physicians had discussed plans for the future with the patient or evaluated the patient's situation after their refusal. Physicians were aware of patients' continued wish to die.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are refused EAS may subsequently be silent about a wish to die without abandoning it. Open communication about wishes to die is important, even outside the context of EAS, because if people feel unable to talk about them, their quality of life may be further diminished.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Follow up appointments after refusal could give patients the opportunity to discuss their feelings and physicians to support them.

An exploratory study of the informational and psychosocial needs of patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Although the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV) is rapidly increasing, patients' informational and psychosocial needs related to the sexual transmission of HPV remain unexplored. The goal of this exploratory study was to assess informational and psychosocial needs of HPV+ OPSCC patients and identify psychosocial challenges associated with having an HPV+ cancer.

METHODS

Patients (N=62; 87% male; mean age=56years) with HPV+ OPSCC and in cohabitating relationships completed paper-pencil questionnaires assessing their HPV-related knowledge (e.g., cancer etiology), information needs (e.g., communicability), psychosocial concerns (e.g., relational consequences, self-blame) and measures of distress and health behaviors. Medical information was obtained from patients' electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of patients correctly identified their HPV status but only 35% of them recognized HPV as their putative cancer cause. The majority of patients disclosed their HPV status to their partner, 41% discussed transmission of the virus, and only 23% felt informed regarding potential transmission risks and precautions. Thirty-nine percent want their oncologist to discuss more about HPV-related issues and 58% sought this from other sources. Over one-third said they would be interested in more HPV-related information. Patients reported moderate levels of distress (mean=3.52, SD=2.54, possible range 0-10) and relatively low levels of self-blame (mean=2.27, SD=1.23, possible range 1-4) with distress and self-blame being significantly correlated (r=.38, p=.005).

CONCLUSION

Significant knowledge gaps exist regarding patients' understanding of the link between HPV and OPSCC and the implications of infectious etiology. Future research is encouraged to establish best practice guidelines.

The evolving concept of "patient-centeredness" in patient-physician communication research

Over the past few decades, the concept of "patient-centeredness" has been intensively studied in health communication research on patient-physician interaction. Despite its popularity, this concept has often been criticized for lacking a unified definition and operationalized measurement. This article reviews how health communication research on patient-physician interaction has conceptualized and operationalized patient-centered communication based on four major theoretical perspectives in sociology (i.e., functionalism, conflict theory, utilitarianism, and social constructionism), and discusses the agenda for future research in this field. Each theory addresses different aspects of the patient-physician relationship and communication from different theoretical viewpoints. Patient-centeredness is a multifaceted construct with no single theory that can sufficiently define the whole concept. Different theoretical perspectives of patient-centered communication can be selectively adopted according to the context and nature of problems in the patient-physician relationship that a particular study aims to explore. The present study may provide a useful framework: it offers an overview of the differing models of patient-centered communication and the expected roles and goals in each model; it does so toward identifying a communication model that fits the patient and the context and toward theoretically reconstructing existing measures of patient-centered communication. Furthermore, although patient-centered communication has been defined mainly from the viewpoint of physician's behaviors aimed at achieving patient-centered care, patient competence is also required for patient-centered communication. This needs to be examined in current medical practice.