Impact of Measurement Imprecision on Genetic Association Studies of Cardiac Function

Background

Recent studies have leveraged quantitative traits from imaging to amplify the power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to gain further insights into the biology of diseases and traits. However, measurement imprecision is intrinsic to phenotyping and can impact downstream genetic analyses.

Methods

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), an important but imprecise quantitative imaging measurement, was examined to assess the impact of precision of phenotype measurement on genetic studies. Multiple approaches to obtain LVEF, as well as simulated measurement noise, were evaluated with their impact on downstream genetic analyses.

Results

Even within the same population, small changes in the measurement of LVEF drastically impacted downstream genetic analyses. Introducing measurement noise as little as 7.9% can eliminate all significant genetic associations in an GWAS with almost forty thousand individuals. An increase of 1% in mean absolute error (MAE) in LVEF had an equivalent impact on GWAS power as a decrease of 10% in the cohort sample size, suggesting optimizing phenotyping precision is a cost-effective way to improve power of genetic studies.

Conclusions

Improving the precision of phenotyping is important for maximizing the yield of genome-wide association studies.

Lactation curve model with explicit representation of perturbations as a phenotyping tool for dairy livestock precision farming

In the context of dairy farming, ruminant females often face challenges inducing perturbations that affect their performance and welfare. A key issue is how to assess the effect of perturbations and provide metrics to quantify how animals cope with their environment. Milk production dynamics are good candidates to address this issue: i) they are easily accessible, ii) overall dynamics throughout lactation process are well described and iii) perturbations are visible through milk losses. In this study, a perturbed lactation model (PLM) with explicit representation of perturbations was developed. The model combines two components: i) the unperturbed lactation model that describes a theoretical lactation curve, assumed to reflect female production potential and ii) the perturbation model that describes all the deviations from the unperturbed lactation model with four parameters: starting date, intensity and shape (collapse and recovery). To illustrate the use of the PLM as a phenotyping tool, it was fitted on a data set of 319 complete lactations from 181 individual dairy goats. A total of 2 354 perturbations were detected, with an average of 7.40 perturbations per lactation. Loss of milk production for the whole lactation due to perturbations varied between 2 and 19% of the milk production predicted by the unperturbed lactation model. The number of perturbations was not the major factor explaining the loss of milk production, suggesting that there are different types of animal response to challenges. By incorporating explicit representation of perturbations in a lactation model, it was possible to determine for each female the potential milk production, characteristics of each perturbation and milk losses induced by perturbations. Further, it was possible to compare animals and analyze individual variability. The indicators produced by the PLM are likely to be useful to move from raw data to decision support tools in dairy production.