Comparison of supine-prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients: prospective randomized study

Mini-PCNL is one of the most effective surgical methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to compare PCNL in the supine-prone position in pediatric patients (especially operation time, postop complications, hospital stay and stone-free rates).We conducted our study in a randomized and prospective manner. Patients with lower pole stones larger than 1 cm, stones larger than 1.5 cm in the pelvis, upper pole, midpole or multiple locations, and patients who did not respond to ESWL or whose family that preferred mini-PCNL to be the primary treatment were included in the study. Patients with any previous kidney stone surgery, patients with coagulation disorders and patients with retrorenal colon were excluded from the study. Between 2021 and 2023, a total of 144 patients underwent PCNL. 68 of these patients had supine PCNL and 76 prone PCNL. Postoperative Clavien grade1 complication occurred in a total of 7 patients in the prone position; Clavien grade1 complication occurred in 1 patient in the supine position. The mean operation time for prone PCNL was 119.88 ± 28.32 min, and the mean operative time for supine PCNL was 98.12 ± 14.97 the mean hospitalization time in prone PCNL was 3.56 ± 1.12 days, and 3.00 ± 0.85 days in supine PCNL. In conclusion, supine PCNL is a safe and effective method in the treatment of pediatric kidney stones and postoperative complications were observed to be less; the operation time and hospital stay were shorter in supine PCNL.

Hemodialysis vascular access in prone position for critically ill patients with ARDS

INTRODUCTION

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is defined in critically ill patients with acute hypoxemia and positive-pressure ventilation in association with several clinical disorders including trauma, pneumonia, sepsis, and aspiration. The prone position has been used for many years and is now recommended for patients with severe or moderate-to-severe ARDS on invasive mechanical ventilation. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with ARDS, with up to a 35% incidence rate. Initiation of Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) requires wise clinical judgment and collaboration between nephrologists and intensivists. A properly functioning vascular access is critical for an optimized KRT. Our institute is a national referral center for respiratory diseases.

RESULTS

We describe 11 cases of dialysis catheter placement for KRT in critically ill patients with ARDS on mechanical ventilation in prone position. The catheter was placed in the first puncture attempt in nine cases, Blood flows (Qb) achieved were 283.4 ± 20.4 ml/min during the session, in six cases the radiologic tip location was achieved in the peri cavoatrial junction; in four cases was achieved in mid to- deep right atrium. The dialysis quality standards were based on KTV and in URR; in nine cases (81.81%) KTV was in 1.3 and in all cases (100%) URR was >65%, lumen dysfunction was reported only in two cases (18.1%), but these cases did respond to mobilization maneuvers. The procedure time of placement was 29.8 min, no arterial punctures or complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that in our study hemodialysis non-tunneled catheter placement in the prone position is safe and effective. We believe this practice could be frequently used in the near future and represent an opportunity window for the training of interventional nephrologists and related areas.

Single Position Lateral versus Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion Inclusive of L4-L5: A Single Surgeon Experience Examining Early Postoperative Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure is a minimally invasive lumbar spine approach that provides indirect neural decompression, improved sagittal alignment, and a high fusion rate. Typically accompanied by posterior pedicle screw insertion, there has been interest in performing LLIF in a single position to decrease cost and time under anesthesia. However, there is a paucity of direct comparisons between single-position LLIF via prone versus lateral decubitus positioning. Therefore, this study aims to compare the outcomes of a single surgeon performing prone versus lateral single-position LLIF, inclusive of the L4-L5 level.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive case series of patients who underwent either prone or lateral, single-position LLIF by a single surgeon. All cases involved the L4-L5 level. Demographic data, perioperative details, clinical outcomes, and preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients underwent lateral and 16 patients underwent prone single-position LLIF. Demographics and average interbody size were similar between groups. Operative time, change in lumbar lordosis, and length of hospital stay did not differ between the 2 positions. Both groups performed similarly in terms of preoperative and postoperative visual analog score pain score and complications. Patients who underwent lateral position LLIF ambulated farther on postoperative day 1 (250 feet vs. 200 feet, P = 0.015). Average time to follow up was 53 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates promising preliminary results indicating that single-position LLIF performs well, even at the L4-L5 level, in both the prone and lateral positions.

Could pain change position choice? Comparison of pain level, analgesic requirement and hospitalization time in supine and prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

Investigation of how position affects postoperative pain levels and hospitalization in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) surgery.

METHODS

Between August 2019 and December 2022, a total of 156 patients who underwent prone (pPNL) and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPNL) due to kidney stones were included in the study. Demographic data, preoperative CT scans, laboratory results, transfusion rates, operation durations, complication rates, stone-free rates, analgesic use, nephrostomy removal time, hospitalization duration, fluoroscopy time, hemoglobin decrease and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were evaluated for all patients. By comparing these data between the sPNL and pPNL groups, the effect of position selection in PNL on pain control, analgesic requirement, and hospitalization duration was examined.

RESULTS

In the comparison of the pPNL and sPNL groups, there was a significant difference between the two groups in body mass index, hounsfield unit, complication rate, analgesic rate, nephrostomy remove time, hospitalization time, operation time, fluoroscopy time and VAS score (p = 0.025, p < 0.001, p = 0.012, p = 0.012, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The shorter operation and hospitalization time in the sPNL group could be attributed to performing surgeries in a physiological position. Additionally, sPNL seems advantageous in terms of patients' pain levels, hospitalization time and VAS scores. One reason for this could be the different areas of access in sPNL and pPNL, which may correspond to different dermatome regions. Considering the low level of pain and reduced analgesic usage, sPNL appears to be advantageous.

The prone posteromedial approach to the knee revisited: a safe and effective strategy for posterior tibial plateau fractures

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of patients with posterior tibial plateau fractures who underwent repair indirectly with an anterior approach to those who underwent direct repair with a prone "Lobenhoffer" operative approach.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients with a posterior column tibial plateau fracture that underwent repair were identified. Twenty-two patients with 22 tibial plateau fractures were fixed using a prone Lobenhoffer approach. They were compared to 22 patients treated with an indirect reduction using a supine approach for similar fracture patterns. Data collection at minimum 1 year included: patient-reported outcome scores (SMFA), patient-reported pain, knee range of motion, complications and need for reoperation. Radiographs were reviewed for knee alignment, residual depression and fracture healing.

RESULTS

All demographics were similar between the groups except BMI, which was lower in the prone group (P < 0.05). Fracture type according to age, Schatzker and three-column classification was matched between cohorts. There was no difference in outcomes including: pain, radiographic knee alignment, residual articular depression, functional outcome (SMFA), complications and need for reoperations. Knee flexion at 1 year was greater in the prone group (127.8 vs. 115.8; P = 0.018). In addition, surgical time was less in the prone group (mean 73.7 min vs. 82.3 min; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

The Lobenhoffer approach with direct reduction of posterior fracture fragments for complex tibial plateau fractures is an excellent option for these injuries. It allowed for faster surgery with improved ultimate knee range of motion in posterior column tibial plateau fractures.

Neuromuscular blockade and oxygenation changes during prone positioning in COVID-19

PURPOSE

Neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) are often used during prone positioning to facilitate mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 related ARDS. However, their impact on oxygenation is uncertain.

METHODS

Multi-centre observational study of invasively ventilated COVID-19 ARDS adults treated with prone positioning. We collected data on baseline characteristics, prone positioning, NMB use and patient outcome. We assessed arterial blood gas data during supine and prone positioning and after return to the supine position.

RESULTS

We studied 548 prone episodes in 220 patients (mean age 54 years, 61% male) of whom 164 (75%) received NMBs. Mean PaO2:FiO2 (P/F ratio) during the first prone episode with NMBs reached 208 ± 63 mmHg compared with 161 ± 66 mmHg without NMBs (Δmean = 47 ± 5 mmHg) for an absolute increase from baseline of 76 ± 56 mmHg versus 55 ± 56 mmHg (padj < 0.001). The mean P/F ratio on return to the supine position was 190 ± 63 mmHg in the NMB group versus 141 ± 64 mmHg in the non-NMB group for an absolute increase from baseline of 59 ± 58 mmHg versus 34 ± 56 mmHg (padj < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

During prone positioning, NMB is associated with increased oxygenation compared to non-NMB therapy, with a sustained effect on return to the supine position. These findings may help guide the use of NMB during prone positioning in COVID-19 ARDS.

The PhLIP team: Feasibility of a physiotherapy-led intensive prone positioning team initiative during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a surge of patients with refractory hypoxaemic respiratory failure being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Prone positioning can improve oxygenation but requires a team of skilled personnel to complete safely. Critical care physiotherapists (PTs) are ideally suited to lead proning teams, due to their expertise in moving critically unwell, invasively ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility of implementing a physiotherapy-led intensive proning (PhLIP) team to support the critical care team during surges.

METHODS

This study involves descriptive evaluation of feasibility and implementation of the PhLIP team, a novel model of care, during the Delta wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, through a retrospective, observational audit of PhLIP team activity, ICU clinical activity, and a description of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 17 September and 19 November 2021, 93 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU. Fifty-one patients (55%) were positioned prone, a median [interquartile range] 2 [2, 5] times, for a mean (±standard deviation) duration of 16 (±2) h, across 161 episodes. Twenty-three PTs were upskilled and deployed to the PhLIP team, adding 2.0 equivalent full time to the daily service. Ninety-four percent of prone episodes (154) were led by the PhLIP PTs with a median 4 [interquartile range: 2, 8] turns per day. Potential airway adverse events occurred on three occasions (1.8%) and included an endotracheal tube leak, displacement, and obstruction. Each incident was promptly managed without prolonged impact on the patient. No manual handling injuries were reported.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a physiotherapy-led proning team was safe and feasible and can release critical care-trained medical and nursing staff to other duties in the ICU.

A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the supine and prone positions for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: a single-center experience

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL), which has a smaller tract size (14-20 Fr) than conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy, has been shown to be safe and effective in pediatric patients with large and complex upper urinary tract stones. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MPCNL between the supine and prone positions in a pediatric population. The data of pediatric patients who underwent MPCNL at our center between January 2010 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical position, the patients were divided into the prone (Group P) and supine (Group S) groups. In both groups, dilatation was performed using 14-18 Fr metallic dilators. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative data, postoperative stone-free rates (SFRs), and complications. There were 36 (59%) patients in Group P and 25 (41%) patients in Group S. Stones were mostly located in the pelvis (49.2%) and second most frequently in the lower pole (27.9%). Fluoroscopy time was shorter in Group S but did not statistically significantly differ compared to Group P (p = 0.181). However, operation time was statistically significantly shorter in Group S (73.8 ± 35 vs. 99.8 ± 37.4 min, p = 0.008). Although there was no significant difference, relatively higher SFR were detected in Group S (88% vs. 83%, p = 0.725). Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was performed on six (24%) patients in Group S, and the SFR was 100% among these patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the presence of complications (16.7% vs. 16%, p = 0.945). Both supine and prone MPCNL appear to be safe and effective in the pediatric age group, with similar stone-free and complication rates. In the supine procedure, the operation time is shortened compared to the prone. In addition, simultaneous retrograde access has the potential to increase the overall success rate of surgery.

Comparison of hemodynamic and respiratory outcomes between two surgical positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the gold standard for the treatment of large and complex kidney stones.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients in the flank position versus prone position.

METHODS

In our prospective randomized trial, 60 patients who would undergo fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided PCNL in prone or flank position were divided into two groups. Demographic features, hemodynamics, respiratory and metabolic parameters, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, amount of fluid given, blood loss and transfusion, duration of operation and hospital stay, and perioperative complications were compared.

RESULTS

PaO2, SaO2, SpO2 and Oxygen Reserve İndex (ORi) at the 60th minute of the operation and in the postoperative period, Pleth Variability index (PVi) at the 60th minute of the operation, driving pressure in all time periods and the amount of bleeding during the operation were determined to be statistically significantly higher in the prone group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of other parameters. Was found to be statistically significantly higher in the prone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to our results the flank position can be preferred in PCNL operations, considering that the position should be chosen according to the surgeon's experience, the patient's anatomical and physiological data, positive effects on respiratory parameters and bleeding, and the operation time can be shortened as the experience increases.

Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in the Standing and Prone Positions of Patients with Old Traumatic Thoracolumbar Kyphosis: Relationship with Immediately Postoperative Parameters

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in spine-pelvis sagittal parameters from the standing position to the prone position and to study the relationship between sagittal parameters and immediately postoperative parameters.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with old traumatic spinal fracture combined with kyphosis were enrolled. The preoperative standing position, prone position, and postoperative sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis, including the local kyphosis Cobb angle (LKCA), thoracic kyphosis angle (TKA), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis angle (PI-LLA), and sagittal vertebral axis (SVA), were measured. The data of kyphotic flexibility and correction rate werecollected and analyzed. The parameters of the preoperative standing position, prone position and postoperative sagittal position were analyzed statistically. Correlation analysis and regression analysis of the preoperative standing and prone sagittal parameters and postoperative parameters were conducted.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the preoperative standing position, prone position, and postoperative LKCA and TK. Correlation analysis showed that preoperative sagittal parameters of the standing position and prone position were all correlated with postoperative homogeneity. Flexibility was not related to the correction rate. Regression analysis showed preoperative standing, prone LKCA, and TK were linear with postoperative standing.

CONCLUSIONS

The LKCA and TK of old traumatic kyphosis obviously changed from the standing position to the prone position, which were linear with postoperative LKCA and TK and can be used to predict postoperative sagittal parameters. This change should be taken into account in the surgical strategy.

Optimizing stone harvesting in miniaturized-PCNL: a critical examination of renal access angles, technology, and the role they play in operative efficiency

PURPOSE

Stone retrieval can be a laborious aspect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A unique phenomenon of mini-PCNL is the vortex-effect (VE), a hydrodynamic form of stone retrieval. Additionally, the vacuum-assisted sheath (VAS) was recently developed as a new tool for stone extraction. The purpose of our study is to investigate the impact of renal access angle (as a surrogate for patient positioning) on stone retrieval efficiency and compare the efficiency among methods of stone retrieval.

METHODS

A kidney model was filled with 3 mm artificial stones. Access to the mid-calyx was obtained using a 15Fr sheath. Stones were retrieved over three minutes at angles of 0°, 25°, and 75° utilizing the VE, VAS, and basket. Stones were weighed for comparison of stones/retraction and stones/minute. Trials were repeated three times at each angle.

RESULTS

Renal access angle of 0° was associated with increased stone retrieval for both the VE and VAS (p < 0.05). The VE was the most effective method for stones retrieved per individual retraction at an angle of 0° (p < 0.005), although when analyzed as stones retrieved per minute, the VE and VAS were no longer statistically different (p = 0.08). At 75°, none of the methods were statistically different, regardless if analyzed as stones per retraction or per minute (p = 0.20-0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal access angle of 0° is more efficient for stone retrieval than a steep upward angle. There is no difference in stone retrieval efficiency between the VE and VAS methods, although both are superior to the basket at lower sheath angles.

The role of mini-PCNL as primary approach for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones in a high-income country. Ten-year single-center report

PURPOSE

To describe our experience in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as a primary treatment for paediatric kidney stones and to highlight its benefits.

METHODS

The design was retrospective and observational. All the children treated for kidney stones from 2011 to 2021 were included. The population was divided into Group A (PCNL) and Group B (retrograde intrarenal surgery, RIRS). The outcomes were stone-free rate (SFR), the rate of procedures per patient, the rate of failure and the rate of complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with 33 kidney units were included. Eighteen of them (64%) were males. The median age was 10 (IQR 6.8-13) years. Forty-seven procedures were performed. Twenty-four of them (51%) were mini-PCNL. Group A included 17 patients (61%). Group A presented a higher SFR (p = 0.007) and a lower number of procedures (p < 0.001). RIRS failed in five cases (45%) because of non-compliant ureter. Two urinary tract infections (UTI) were reported after PCNL and four UTIs after RIRS (p = 0.121). No major complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Mini-PCNL should be suggested as a primary approach for pediatric kidney stones. This technique presented a better effectiveness with a reduced number of procedures when compared to RIRS.

Is supine position safe and effective for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Clinical experiences, tip and tricks in learning curve and PSAA technique

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the factors facilitating the supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique in learning curve, to compare the supine and prone technique results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

47 patients who required percutaneous nephrolithotomy were included in this study, and they were divided into two groups as supine and prone. Prone technique was performed to 24 patients in the first group. In the second group, the supine technique was performed by calculating the patient-specific access angle for 23 patients. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative parameters, transfusion, and complications of both groups were compared.

RESULTS

Age, gender, side, stone size, stone-free rate, and length of stay in hospital were not statistically significant between the groups. Operation and fluoroscopy time were lower in the supine group, but it was not statistically significant. The decrease in hemoglobin was higher in the supine group and it was statistically significant (p = 0.027). The decrease in hemoglobin was not symptomatic in both groups. In addition, transfusion rates were similar and not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

In previous studies, the supine technique was evaluated in terms of many factors. Process steps were tried to be standardized and improvements were made in the access technique. The supine technique, which uses patient-specific access angle, has similar complication rates as the prone technique. However, the operation and fluoroscopy times are shorter than the prone technique. For surgeons on the learning curve, the supine technique is safe, feasible, and has even shorter operating times with a patient-specific access angle.

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of 6h-pronation in neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome, or affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome or evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a prospective, physiological, crossover, controlled cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pronation ameliorates oxygenation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); the effect in neonates with ARDS or other types of respiratory failure is unknown. We aimed to verify if pronation has similar respiratory and haemodynamic effects in three common types of neonatal respiratory failure.

METHODS

Prospective, physiologic, crossover, quasi-randomised, controlled cohort study performed in a tertiary academic neonatal intensive care unit. We enrolled neonates with: 1) recovering respiratory distress syndrome (RDS, mild restrictive pattern); 2) neonatal ARDS (NARDS, severe restrictive pattern); or 3) evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), that is chronic pulmonary insufficiency of prematurity (mixed restrictive/obstructive pattern). Neonates with other lung disorders, malformations or haemodynamic impairment were excluded. Patients were started prone or supine and then shifted to the alternate position for 6h; measurements were performed after 30' of "wash out" from the positioning and at the end of 6h period. Primary outcomes were respiratory (PtcCO_2, modified ventilatory index, PtcO₂/FiO₂, SpO₂/FiO₂, oxygenation index, ultrasound-assessed lung aeration) and haemodynamic (perfusion index, heart rate, arterial pressure, cardiac output) parameters.

FINDINGS

Between May 1st, 2019, and May 31st, 2021, 161 participants were enrolled in this study, and included in the final analysis. Pronation improved gas exchange and lung aeration (p always <0.01) and these effects were overturned in the alternate position, except for lung aeration in NARDS where the improvement persisted. The effects were greater in patients recovering from RDS than in those with evolving BPD than in those with NARDS, in this order (p always <0.01). Pronation produced a net recruitment as lung ultrasound score decreased in patients shifted from supine (16.9 (standard deviation: 5.8)) to prone (14.1 (standard deviation: 3.3), p < 0.01) and this reduction correlated with oxygenation improvement. Haemodynamic parameters remained within normal ranges.

INTERPRETATION

6h-pronation can be used to improve gas exchange and lung aeration in neonates with recovering RDS, evolving BPD or NARDS without relevant haemodynamic effects.

FUNDING

None.

Anterolateral versus modified posterolateral approach for tibial plateau fractures with involvement of the posterior column: a cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the reduction quality of the anterolateral (AL) and modified posterolateral approach (PL) in lateral tibial plateau fractures involving the posterior column and central segments.

METHODS

Matched pairs of pre-fractured cadaveric tibial plateau fractures were treated by either AL approach (supine position) or PL approach (prone position). Reduction was controlled by fluoroscopy and evaluated as satisfying or unacceptable. Afterwards, the reduction was examined by 3D scan.

RESULTS

10 specimens (3 pairs 41B3.1, 2 pairs 41C3.3) were evaluated. PL approach achieved significantly (p 0.00472) better fracture reduction results (0.4 ± 0.7 mm) of the posterior column compared to the AL group (2.1 ± 1.4 mm). Fracture steps involving the central area of the lateral plateau were insufficiently reduced after fluoroscopy using both approaches.

CONCLUSION

Optimal reduction of displaced tibial plateau fractures involving the posterolateral column necessitates a posterior approach, which can be conducted in prone or lateral positioning. The anterolateral approach is indicated in fractures with minor displacement of the posterolateral rim but fracture extension in the latero-central segments. In these cases, an additional video-assisted reduction or extended approaches are helpful.

Optimal patient position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: Traditional prone or supine?

OBJECTIVE

Although it was stated that supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was associated with relatively shorter surgical times and comparable success and complication rates, there is no consensus in the current literature concerning the safety and efficacy of supine PCNL in patients with horseshoe kidneys. We aimed to compare supine and prone PCNL regarding safety and efficacy in patients with horseshoe kidneys.

METHODS

Data of the patients with horseshoe kidneys who underwent PCNL for renal stones larger than 2 cm between January 2010 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were categorized as Group 1 (i.e., supine PCNL-SPCNL) and Group 2 (i.e., prone PCNL-PPCNL). Both groups were compared regarding demographic, clinical, and surgical data.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included. Among these patients, 31 (47.7%) were in Group 1, while 34 (52.3%) were in Group 2. Both groups were statistically similar in terms of demographic data, stone characteristics, perioperative parameters, and complication rates (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in terms of additional treatment rates, stone-free rates in the postoperative second-day and third-month evaluations (p > 0.05). Mean surgical time was significantly longer in Group 2 (113 ± 17.1 min) than in Group 1 (90.6 ± 11.3 min) (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Although it is traditionally performed in the prone position, the supine approach is as safe and effective as the prone approach. In addition, the supine approach is associated with significantly shorter surgical times.

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position versus Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position for the management of partial staghorn calculi

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the outcome of ECIRS in the treatment of partial staghorn renal calculi in both prone split-leg positions versus GMSV positions with regard to; technical aspects, success rate, operative time, complications, safety, and effectiveness of both approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 2018 and August 2021, 66 patients with partial staghorn calculi were enrolled in this prospective comparative study. Patients were randomly divided according to a 1:1 ratio into two groups. Group A included 33 patients who were treated by (ECIRS) in the prone split-leg position, and group B included 33 patients who were treated by (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position.

RESULTS

No significant statistical difference between both groups regarding the mean age (p = 0.448), mean body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.137), mean stone burden (p = 0.435), mean operative time (p = 0.541) and the number of calyces located in branched stones (p = 0.628). The mean hospital stay was 6.71 ± 1.12 days for group A and 6.66 ± 1.10 days for group B patients (p = 0.724). The final SFR was achieved in (29)87.87% and (30)90.9% of group A & B patients, respectively (p = 0.694). No significant difference was detected between both groups in perioperative complication rates.

CONCLUSION

ECIRS is safe and effective in treating partial staghorn calculi either in the prone split-leg position or in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position, with comparable outcomes and no statistically significant difference between both positions.

Does surgical position affect infective complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

The downward orientation of the access sheath during supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) allows the faster evacuation of fluids and stone fragments. It theoretically can contribute to the reduction of the high intrarenal pressure-associated complications. We aimed to investigate whether there is a difference between prone and supine PCNL in terms of infective complications. This retrospective study includes 182 patients who underwent supine and prone PCNL due to kidney stones in our clinic between April 2020 and May 2022. Demographic (age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities), radiological (cumulative stone burden, stone density, number of stones, stone localization, stone laterality, presence of hydronephrosis), clinical (previous stone surgery, previous urinary tract) and perioperative (prone or supine position, surgery duration, hospitalization, success, non-infective and infective complications) data of all patients were evaluated. All patients were divided into two groups, the prone position group, and the supine position group. These two groups were compared in terms of pre and postoperative data above. Infective complications were observed in 16 (18%) patients in the prone position group and in 7 (7.5%) patients in the supine position group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.034). Surgery duration (OR = 1.041; 95% CI 1.021-1.061; p < 0.001), number of stones (OR = 4.09; 95% CI 1.093-7.309; p = 0.036), previous urinary tract infection (OR = 6.272; 95% CI 1.936-9.317; p = 0.002) and prone position (OR = 4.511; 95% CI 1.265-7.087; p = 0.02) were found as independent risk factors for infective complications. Prone position was proved as an independent predictor of postoperative infectious events. Supine PCNL will be further adopted as the standard PCNL approach by a continuously growing proportion of endourologists.

Pre-operative prone radiographs can reliably determine spinal curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between non-effort prone and bending radiographs in determining curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of AIS patients who underwent pre-operative full spine radiographic imaging from 2006 to 2019 was performed. The Cobb angle (CA) of proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured and correlated on standing, prone and bending radiographs. Standing, bending, and prone measurements were correlated using Spearman's analysis, and intra-rater reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients (74% female) with a mean age of 15.1 ± 2.5 years were identified. A strong correlation existed between the prone and bending CA for the PT (r_s = 0.797, p < 0.01) and MT (r_s = 0.779, p < 0.01) curve and a moderate correlation existed between the prone and bending TL/L curve (r_s = 0.641, p < 0.01). For a non-structural PT curve, a prone CA < 25° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 96.7% of the time (p < 0.005). For a non-structural MT curve, a prone CA < 35° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 90.2% of the time (p < 0.005). For a non-structural TL/L curve, a prone CA < 35° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 95% of the time (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Prone radiographs demonstrated a moderate to strong correlation with bending radiographs and may be used as a proxy for determining spinal flexibility, especially when bending films are deemed unreliable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison between prone and supine nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: a double center experience

PURPOSE

Stone disease in the pediatric age is an increasing issue. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL) can be used for larger and complex stones. As in adults it can be performed in the supine or prone position.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed two centers' experience in prone and supine PNL in children to analyze its results and complications.

RESULTS

33 patients underwent prone and 19 supine procedures. Patients in the prone group were younger than in the supine, while no significant differences were found in stone burden, access size, operative time or complications. Complications were: 8 and 4 Clavien 1 for the prone and supine group, respectively, one case of urosepsis (4b) in the prone and 2 cases of Clavien 3 in the supine group (double J stent placement for renal colic and ureteroscopy for steinstrasse). Tubeless procedures and mean nephrostomy time were in favor of the supine group, whereas fluoroscopy time and ureteral drainage stay were in support of the prone group. Stone free rate was better in the supine group (83.3 vs 66.6%), possibly reflecting the capability to perform a combined approach in 12 patients (allowing to reach all the calyx with simultaneous anterograde and retrograde access) or younger age in the prone group (13 vs 2 patients ≤5 years), with no differences in stone burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Supine approach seems to guarantee higher stone-free rates. Larger series are necessary to determine what the best technique is in terms of X-ray exposure, operative time and complications.

Single-position prone transpsoas fusion for the treatment of lumbar adjacent segment disease: early experience of twenty-four cases across three tertiary medical centers

PURPOSE

Prone transpsoas fusion (PTP) is a minimally invasive technique that maximizes the benefit of lateral access interbody surgery and the prone positioning for surgically significant adjacent segment disease. The authors describe the feasibility, reproducibility and radiographic efficacy of PTP when performed for cases of lumbar ASD.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing PTP for treatment of lumbar ASD at three institutions were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic information was recorded, as was operative data such as adjacent segment levels, operative time, blood loss, laterality of approach, open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation and need for primary decompression. Radiographic measurements including segmental and global lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and sagittal vertical axis were recorded both pre- and immediately post-operatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients met criteria for inclusion. Average age was 60.4 ± 10.4 years and average BMI was 31.6 ± 5.0 kg/m². Total operative time was 204.7 ± 83.3 min with blood loss of 187.9 ± 211 mL. Twenty-one patients had pedicle screw instrumentation exchanged percutaneously and 3 patients had open pedicle screw exchange. Two patients suffered pulmonary embolism that was treated medically with no long-term sequelae. One patient had transient lumbar radicular pain and all patients were discharged home with an average length of stay of 3.0 days (range 1-6). Radiographically, global lumbar lordosis improved by an average of 10.3 ± 9.0 degrees, segmental lordosis by 10.1 ± 13.3 degrees and sagittal vertical axis by 3.2 ± 3.2 cm.

CONCLUSION

Single-position prone transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion is a clinically reproducible minimally invasive technique that can effectively treat lumbar adjacent segment disease.

Body position for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia for critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The evidence about the best body position to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is unclear. The aim of this study was to know what the best body position is to prevent VAP, shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and reduce mortality among patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV).

Methods

We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including intubated patients undergoing MV and admitted to an ICU. The assessed interventions were different body positions (i.e., lateral, prone, semi-recumbent) or alternative degrees of positioning in mechanically ventilated patients.

Results

Semi-recumbent and prone positions showed a risk reduction of VAP incidence (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25–0.52) and mortality (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50–0.91), respectively, compared to the supine position. The ranking probabilities and the surface under the cumulative ranking displayed as the first best option of treatment the semi-recumbent position to reduce the incidence of VAP (71.4%), the hospital length of stay (68.9%), and the duration of MV (67.6%); and the prone position to decrease the mortality (89.3%) and to reduce the ICU length of stay (59.3%).

Conclusions

Cautiously, semi-recumbent seems to be the best position to reduce VAP incidence, hospital length of stay and the duration of MV. Prone is the most effective position to reduce the risk of mortality and the ICU length of stay, but it showed no effect on the VAP incidence.

Registration PROSPERO CRD42021247547

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-022-00600-z.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation for cardiac arrest when patients are in the prone position: A systematic review

AIM

To perform a systematic review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and/or defibrillation in the prone position compared to turning the patient supine prior to starting CPR and/or defibrillation.

METHODS

The search included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL Plus, and medRxiv on December 9, 2020. The population included adults and children in any setting with cardiac arrest while in the prone position. The outcomes included arterial blood pressure and end-tidal capnography during CPR, time to start CPR and defibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation, survival and survival with favorable neurologic outcome to discharge, 30 days or longer. ROBINS-I was performed to assess risk of bias for observational studies.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 29 case reports (32 individual cases), two prospective observational studies, and two simulation studies. The observational studies enrolled 17 patients who were declared dead in the supine position and reported higher mean systolic blood pressure from CPR in prone position (72 mmHg vs 48 mmHg, p < 0.005; 79 ± 20 mmHg vs 55 ± 20 mmHg, p = 0.028). One simulation study reported a faster time to defibrillation in the prone position. Return of spontaneous circulation, survival to discharge or 30 days were reported in adult and paediatric case reports. Critical risk of bias limited our ability to perform pooled analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a limited number of observational studies and case reports comparing prone versus supine CPR and/or defibrillation. Prone CPR may be a reasonable option if immediate supination is difficult or poses unacceptable risks to the patient.

Positioning as a conservative treatment option in infants with micrognathia and/or cleft

Evaluation and management of airway obstruction in prone position were reviewed from studies in infants with micrognathia and/or cleft palate, using polysomnography (PSG) or similar measures, and comparing prone against other positions. Most studies identified were case series from specialist referral centres. Airway obstruction appears more severe on PSG than clinical assessment, but there is no consensus for PSG definitions of mild, moderate or severe airway obstruction. Infants show individual variability in responses to positioning; sleep quality tends to improve when prone, but 22-25% have better respiratory outcomes when supine. Most centres recommend home monitoring if advising that an infant be placed prone to manage their airway obstruction. In conclusion, in case series, success rates for managing infant airway obstruction by prone positioning vary from 12 to 76%. PSG studies comparing prone with other sleep positions can help differentiate which infants show improved airway obstruction and/or sleep quality when positioned prone.

Prone vs. supine accelerated partial breast irradiation on an MR-Linac: A planning study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may benefit from the MR-Linac for target definition, patient setup, and motion monitoring. In this planning study, we investigated whether prone or supine position is dosimetrically beneficial for APBI on an MR-Linac and we evaluated patient comfort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-patients (9 postoperative, 11 preoperative) with a DCIS or breast tumor <3 cm underwent 1.5 T MRI in prone and supine position. The tumor or tumor bed was delineated as GTV and a 2 cm CTV-margin and 0.5 cm PTV-margin were added. 1.5 T MR-Linac treatment plans (5 × 5.2 Gy) with 11 beams were created for both positions in each patient. We evaluated the number of plans that achieved the planning constraints and performed a dosimetric comparison between prone and supine position using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p-value <0.01 for significance). Patient experience during scanning was evaluated with a questionnaire.

RESULTS

All 40 plans met the target coverage and OAR constraints, regardless of position. Heart D_mean was not significantly different (1.07 vs. 0.79 Gy, p-value: 0.027). V5Gy to the ipsilateral lung (4.4% vs. 9.8% median, p-value 0.009) and estimated delivery time (362 vs. 392 s, p-value: 0.003) were significantly lower for prone position. PTV coverage and dose to other OAR were comparable between positions. The majority of patients (13/20) preferred supine position.

CONCLUSION

APBI on the MR-Linac is dosimetrically feasible in prone and supine position. Mean heart dose was similar in both positions. Ipsilateral lung V5Gy was lower in prone position.

Comparison of Prone Transpsoas and Standard Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Retrospective Radiographic Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (PTP-LLIF) is a recently introduced modification to standard LLIF. To date, no study has compared the radiographic outcomes of standard LLIF and PTP-LLIF. We performed a radiographic parameter-based propensity score-matched analysis to compare postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes between PTP-LLIF and standard LLIF for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

METHODS

A total of 30 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. The preoperative standing scoliosis radiographs were retrospectively reviewed for global and segmental sagittal alignment. Propensity score matching was calculated using the baseline radiographic parameters. One-to-one matching of patients who had undergone PTP-LLIF with those who had a similar propensity score but had undergone standard LLIF was performed to compare the radiographic (primary) and clinical (secondary) outcomes.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching resulted in 10 pairs of PTP-LLIF and standard LLIF patients. The PTP-LLIF group had had significantly better improvement in lumbar lordosis (P = 0.047). The difference in the improvement in pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch approached statistical significance for the PTP-LLIF group (P = 0.05). This led to better improvement in the short-form 12-item physical score (P = 0.03) and Oswestry disability index (P = 0.1) in the PTP-LLIF group. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in the other clinical and radiographic outcomes. The PTP-LLIF group had a shorter operative time (P = 0.4) and hospital stay (P = 0.1), without a statistically difference, and shorter radiation exposure time (P = 0.5). The standard LLIF group had experienced less intraoperative bleeding, without a statistically significant difference (P = 0.3). The mean follow-up time was 10.2 ± 5.2 months in the PTP-LLIF group and 30.9 ± 17.2 months in the standard LLIF group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The PTP-LLIF group showed significantly better improvement in lumbar lordosis and short-form 12-item physical score.

Rationale and design of the prone position and respiratory outcomes in non-intubated COVID-19 patients: The "PRONE" study

While benefits of prone position in mechanically-ventilated patients have been well-described, a randomized-control trial to determine the effects of prone positioning in awake, spontaneously-breathing patients with an acute pneumonia has not been previously conducted. Prone Position and Respiratory Outcomes in Non-Intubated COVID-19 PatiEnts: the “PRONE” Study (PRONE) was conducted in non-intubated hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia as defined by respiratory rate ≥ 20/min or an oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO₂) ≤ 93% without supplemental oxygen [1]. The PRONE trial was designed to investigate the effects of prone positioning on need for escalation in respiratory support, as defined by need for transition to a higher acuity level of care, increased fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), or the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary objectives were to assess the duration of effect of prone positioning on respiratory parameters such as respiratory rate and SpO₂, as well as other outcomes such as time to discharge or transition in level of care.

Prone Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Grade II Spondylolisthesis: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) provides indirect decompression without disruption of the posterior elements. It involves a larger implant footprint than that of posterior approaches. LLIF is typically performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. When a posterior fixation is indicated, a second-stage procedure is performed with the patient in the prone position. Single-position surgery provides the potential advantage of decreased operative time because both procedures can be performed without patient repositioning. Single-position LLIF and posterior fixation in the prone position have not been well validated to date. Herein, techniques for LLIF, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and facetectomy in the prone position are shown. A 76-yr-old woman with osteoporosis presented with severe back and bilateral leg pain refractory to conservative management and imaging findings of grade 2 dynamic anterolisthesis at L4-L5 with severe stenosis. She underwent LLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and facetectomy. She was placed on a Jackson table in the prone position for the entire procedure, which was performed in a single stage. Percutaneous pedicle screws were placed, followed by a left-sided minimally invasive facetectomy. A left-sided retroperitoneal transpsoas approach was used to perform the LLIF in standard fashion. Finally, the rods were locked into place. Postoperatively, the patient was neurologically stable, and imaging confirmed good hardware placement. At the 6-wk follow-up, the patient was doing well. This case demonstrates the feasibility of performing LLIF and posterior fixation in a single stage in the prone position. The patient provided informed consent. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute.

Effect of prone versus supine position in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objective

To review the effects of prone position and supine position on oxygenation parameters in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized trials.

Patients

Databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from its inception until March 2021.

Interventions

COVID-19 patients being positioned in the prone position either whilst awake or mechanically ventilated.

Measurements

Primary outcomes were oxygenation parameters (PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, PaCO₂, SpO₂). Secondary outcomes included the rate of intubation and mortality rate.

Results

Thirty-five studies (n = 1712 patients) were included in this review. In comparison to the supine group, prone position significantly improved the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (study = 13, patients = 1002, Mean difference, MD 52.15, 95% CI 37.08 to 67.22; p < 0.00001) and SpO₂ (study = 11, patients = 998, MD 4.17, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.81; p ≤0.00001). Patients received prone position were associated with lower incidence of mortality (study = 5, patients = 688, Odd ratio, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.80; p = 0.007). No significant difference was noted in the incidence of intubation rate (study = 5, patients = 626, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.86; p = 0.42) between the supine and prone groups.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that prone position improved PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio with better SpO₂ than supine position in COVID-19 patients. Given the limited number of studies with small sample size and substantial heterogeneity of measured outcomes, further studies are warranted to standardize the regime of prone position to improve the certainty of evidence.

PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021234050

A study on comparative outcomes of totally ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone versus flank position: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

The percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the gold-standard for treating patients with the larger renal stones and staghorn calculi. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of flank versus prone position in patients underwent ultrasonic-guided PCNL for treatment of large kidney stones.

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 2017 to September 2019 in the department of Urology, Labbafinejad University hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Two hundred patients with kidney stones larger than 2 cm underwent PCNLs in prone (n = 100) or flank position (n = 100). Success rate, operative time, access time, hemoglobin and creatinine changes, hospital stay, auxiliary procedure and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in their baseline characteristics. The success rates in prone (87%) versus flank position (85%) were not significantly different at the first post-operative follow-up (p = 0.91). At the three-month follow-up, the overall stone free rates for the prone position PCNLs and flank position PCNLs were 94/100 (94%) and 90/100 (90%) (p = 0.96). There were no significant difference between the groups in operative time (p = 0.42), access time (p = 0.66), hemoglobin (p = 0.46) and creatinine (p = 0.22) changes, hospital stay (p = 0.05), auxiliary procedures (p = 0.75) and surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there is no significant difference between prone and flank positions in success rate and complications. More prospective studies must be carried out to identify patient populations who are most apt to benefit from one position over the other.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT20200902048597N1 DATE OF REGISTRATION: 2020-11-21, retrospectively registered.

Incidence of posterolateral and retrorenal colon in supine and prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Colon injury is a distressing complication during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Posterolateral colon (PLC) and retrorenal colon (RRC) are known to be the risk factors of colonic injury during PCNL. We evaluated the incidence of PLC and RRC in both supine and prone position of patients who underwent PCNL in our institution, and determined the risk factors of PLC and RRC through a review of computed tomography (CT) scan. To define PLC and RRC, we divided kidney into anterior, anterolateral, posterolateral and retrorenal zone by drawing three parallel lines in the CT scan. Among a total of 102 patients, PLC and RRC were identified in 16 (15.7%) cases in supine, and 25 (24.5%) cases in the prone position. PLC and RRC were most frequently present in the upper and lower pole of the left kidney in prone position compared to supine (p value less than 0.001). Risk factors of PLC and RRC in the prone position were old age (over 68), lower body mass index (BMI), and thinner perirenal fat layer. Therefore, an initial percutaneous puncture in PCNL needs to be carefully accessed to those patients with such high risks of colon injury.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Based on Pulse-Pressure Variation Compared with Standard Fluid Therapy in Patients Undergoing Complex Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Study Design

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Purpose

To determine whether the use of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDT) guided by pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and fluid management protocol can reduce intraoperative hypotension, blood transfusion requirements, and postoperative complications in adults undergoing complex spine surgery.

Overview of Literature

Complex spine surgeries involve a significant risk of blood loss and intraoperative hypotension. Previous studies showed that GDT reduces intraoperative hypotension and postoperative complications in these surgery types; however, limited information exists about GDT guided by PPV.

Methods

Sixty adults (18–70 years) patients undergoing complex spine surgeries at Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand were enrolled. Patients were allocated to two groups (30 patients in each) using computer-generated randomization. Intraoperative fluid and vasopressor were administrated via either GDT or standard care. The GDT algorithm used PPV and fluid protocol as the primary tool to guide hemodynamic management. The incidences and episodes of perioperative hypotension were measured as the outcomes.

Results

Fifty-seven patients were analyzed (three patients in the GDT group were excluded). The baseline characteristics and surgical procedures of the two groups did not differ significantly. The prevalence of intraoperative hypotension was 80.0% for the control group and 66.7% for the GDT group (p=0.25). Two episodes (1–3) of intraoperative hypotension occurred in the control group, and one episode (0–3) occurred in the GDT group; the difference was not significantly different (p=0.57). The intraoperative blood transfusion requirements and postoperative complications were similar in both the groups. In the subgroup analysis, patients with intraoperative hypotension exhibited a higher incidence of postoperative bowel dysfunction.

Conclusions

PPV-guided GDT and fluid protocol, as compared with standard practice, did not show significant advantages with respect to intraoperative hypotension, blood transfusion, or postoperative complications in patients undergoing complex spine surgery in the prone position.

Prolonging deep inspiration breath-hold time to 3 min during radiotherapy, a simple solution

•

A new protocol was developped to prolong deep inspiration breath-holds.

•

Multiple prolonged breath-holds are achievable with minimal side effects.

•

DIBH was prolonged to 3 min using HFNO and hyperventilation in breast cancer patients.

Background and purpose

Deep inspiration breath-hold is an established technique to reduce heart dose during breast cancer radiotherapy. However, modern breast cancer radiotherapy techniques with lymph node irradiation often require long beam-on times of up to 5 min. Therefore, the combination with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) becomes challenging. A simple support technique for longer duration deep inspiration breath-hold (L-DIBH), feasible for daily use at the radiotherapy department, is required to maximize heart sparing.

Materials and methods

At our department, a new protocol for multiple L-DIBH of at least 2 min and 30 s was developed on 32 healthy volunteers and validated on 8 breast cancer patients during radiotherapy treatment, using a pragmatic process of iterative development, including all major stakeholders. Each participant performed 12 L-DIBHs, on 4 different days. Different methods of pre-oxygenation and voluntary hyperventilation were tested, and scored on L-DIBH duration, ease of use, and comfort.

Results

Based on 384 L-DIBHs from 32 healthy volunteers, voluntary hyperventilation for 3 min whilst receiving high-flow nasal oxygen at 40 L/min was the most promising technique. During validation, the median L-DIBH duration in prone position of 8 breast cancer patients improved from 59 s without support to 3 min and 9 s using the technique (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A new and simple L-DIBH protocol was developed feasible for daily use at the radiotherapy center.

Facial Pressure Injuries from Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Era

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to determine the incidence of facial pressure injuries associated with prone positioning for COVID-19 patients as well as to characterize the location of injuries and treatments provided.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of 263 COVID-19 positive patients requiring intubation in the intensive care units at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and MedStar Washington Hospital Center between March 1st and July 26th, 2020. Information regarding proning status, duration of proning, presence, or absence of facial pressure injuries and interventions were collected. Paired two-tailed t-test was used to evaluate differences between proned patients who developed pressure injuries with those who did not.

RESULTS

Overall, 143 COVID-19 positive patients required proning while intubated with the average duration of proning being 5.15 days. Of those proned, 68 (47.6%) developed a facial pressure injury. The most common site involved was the cheek with a total of 57 (84%) followed by ears (50%). The average duration of proning for patients who developed a pressure injury was significantly longer when compared to those who did not develop pressure injuries (6.79 days vs. 3.64 days, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Facial pressure injuries occur with high incidence in patients with COVID-19 who undergo prone positioning. Longer duration of proning appears to confer greater risk for developing these pressure injuries. Hence, improved preventative measures and early interventions are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2139-E2142, 2021.

Use of dexamethasone, remdesivir, convalescent plasma and prone positioning in the treatment of severe COVID-19 infection in pregnancy: A case report

Severe infection with COVID-19 virus in pregnancy offers unique management challenges for the obstetrician and critical care specialist. We report the case of a woman at 26 weeks of gestation with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19 infection treated with dexamethasone, remdesivir, convalescent plasma and mechanical ventilation. Cesarean delivery was performed at 29 weeks due to worsening maternal status. This case offers insight into the assessment and successful use of treatment strategies, including dexamethasone, remdesivir, convalescent plasma, early prone positioning, conservative fluid management, permissive hypoxia and low tidal volume parameters with ventilator support for pregnancies affected by severe COVID-19 infection.

•

Dexamethasone offers maternal and fetal benefits in severe COVID-19 infection.

•

Lung protective ventilator settings can be used in pregnancy in COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.

•

Use of prone positioning for improved ventilation is well tolerated in pregnancy.

•

Fetal heart rate tracing is a clinical indicator of maternal oxygenation status.

•

Permissive hypoxia can be used to prevent barotrauma and advance fetal maturity.

Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping and expanded grey literature review for the COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

To identify and summarize the available science on prone resuscitation. To determine the value of undertaking a systematic review on this topic; and to identify knowledge gaps to aid future research, education and guidelines.

METHODS

This review was guided by specific methodological framework and reporting items (PRISMA-ScR). We included studies, cases and grey literature regarding prone position and CPR/cardiac arrest. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Google Scholar. Expanded grey literature searching included internet search engine, targeted websites and social media.

RESULTS

Of 453 identified studies, 24 (5%) studies met our inclusion criteria. There were four prone resuscitation-relevant studies examining: blood and tidal volumes generated by prone compressions; prone compression quality metrics on a manikin; and chest computed tomography scans for compression landmarking. Twenty case reports/series described the resuscitation of 25 prone patients. Prone compression quality was assessed by invasive blood pressure monitoring, exhaled carbon dioxide and pulse palpation. Recommended compression location was zero-to-two vertebral segments below the scapulae. Twenty of 25 cases (80%) survived prone resuscitation, although few cases reported long term outcome (neurological status at hospital discharge). Seven cases described full neurological recovery.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review did not identify sufficient evidence to justify a systematic review or modified resuscitation guidelines. It remains reasonable to initiate resuscitation in the prone position if turning the patient supine would lead to delays or risk to providers or patients. Prone resuscitation quality can be judged using end-tidal CO₂, and arterial pressure tracing, with patients turned supine if insufficient.

The role of patient positioning on the outcome of acetabular fractures fixation through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and internal fixation through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is the treatment of choice for selected acetabular fracture patterns. Patient positioning (lateral vs prone) can affect the outcome and post-operative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of seventy-three adult patients' with acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in either prone or lateral position. Primary outcome was the quality of radiographic fracture reduction; secondary outcomes included operative time, intra-operative estimated blood loss and pre-operative complications.

RESULTS

The demographics and fracture type were similar between the two groups. There was no difference in the quality of reduction using the Matta radiographic grading. Laterally positioned group demonstrated significant shorter surgical time and lower incidence of iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury. There was no difference in estimated blood loss, heterotopic ossification or infection.

CONCLUSION

This study showed no difference in the quality of fracture reduction, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative infection and heterotopic ossification between both groups. Hence, patients' condition, surgeon experience and preference are important factors for deciding patient positioning in the Kocher-Langenbeck approach for acetabulum fracture fixation.

Proning during covid-19: Challenges and solutions

•

We discuss the importance of teamwork in the care of COVID-19 patients.

•

Recent data show a major disconnect between physicians and nurses regarding the benefits of prone positioning in ARDS.

•

We suggest a number of strategies to improve execution of prone positioning via multidisciplinary efforts.

Despite proven benefits to prone positioning in ARDS, a disconnect exists regarding the impressions of its utility among members of the healthcare team. While the majority of physicians view prone positioning as beneficial in ARDS, recent data suggest that the minority of ICU nurses have the same impression. The COVID pandemic has raised particularly challenges in terms of availability of personnel and supplies at least in some institutions. We discuss various barriers to implementation of prone positioning and suggest a number of strategies to optimize patient care. We use a multidisciplinary team approach to execute prone positioning in COVID ARDS.

Conscious prone positioning during non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: experience from a single centre

Critically ill patients admitted to hospital following SARS-CoV-2 infection often experience hypoxic respiratory failure and a proportion require invasive mechanical ventilation to maintain adequate oxygenation. The combination of prone positioning and non-invasive ventilation in conscious patients may have a role in improving oxygenation. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of prone positioning in spontaneously ventilating patients receiving non-invasive ventilation admitted to the intensive care.  Clinical data of 81 patients admitted with COVID 19 pneumonia and acute hypoxic respiratory failure were retrieved from electronic medical records and examined. Patients who had received prone positioning in combination with non-invasive ventilation were identified.

A total of 20 patients received prone positioning in conjunction with non-invasive ventilation. This resulted in improved oxygenation as measured by a change in PaO ₂/FiO ₂ (P/F) ratio of 28.7 mmHg while prone, without significant change in heart rate or respiratory rate. Patients on average underwent 5 cycles with a median duration of 3 hours. There were no reported deaths, 7 of the 20 patients (35%) failed non-invasive ventilation and subsequently required intubation and mechanical ventilation. In our cohort of 20 COVID-19 patients with moderate acute hypoxic respiratory failure, prone positioning with non-invasive ventilation resulted in improved oxygenation. Prone positioning with non-invasive ventilation may be considered as an early therapeutic intervention in COVID-19 patients with moderate acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Split-leg modified lateral versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized trial

PURPOSE

Standard prone position (PP) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has multiple drawbacks. We aimed to compare PNLs performed in split-leg (SL) modified lateral position (MLP) and those performed in standard PP.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, unblind, double arm trial was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center in Egypt, between November 2017 and October 2019. Adult patients with renal stones undergoing PNL were included. According to renal anatomy and stone complexity, stratified randomization was performed and study participants were allocated into either SL-MLP group or PP group. The stone free rate (SFR), total operative time, track formation time, fluoroscopy time, auxiliary procedures, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

There were 61 patients in SL-MLP group and 63 patients in PP group. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The SFR was comparable between groups: 75.4% in SL-MLP group and 77.8% in PP group (p = 0.755). The mean total operative time was shorter and mean track formation time was longer in SL-MLP group (55.33 ± 20.73 vs. 98.49 ± 9.23, p < 0.001 and 7.89 ± 3.68 vs. 6.52 ± 1.77, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, total complication rates, hemoglobin reduction and need for blood transfusion between the groups. In SL-MLP group, all PNL procedures as well all the associated procedures were performed with the patients in the same position.

CONCLUSION

SL-MLP PNL has a short operative time and similar SFR and complication rate compared to PP PNL. SL-MLP allowed antegrade and retrograde access to the urinary tract without patient repositioning.

Achieving a popliteal venous access for renal replacement therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patient in prone position

This patient is a 67-year-old man who initially presented to our facility with acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. Soon after arrival at our facility, the patient decompensated, developing severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring intubation and prone positioning to maintain adequate oxygenation. During the next few days, acute kidney injury with oliguria and severe volume overload developed. The vascular surgery service was consulted to obtain central venous access for emergent continuous renal replacement therapy. On examination, the patient was sedated and paralyzed in a rotating prone-positioning bed. He could not be positioned supine without immediately becoming hypoxic and decompensating. A 50-cm Permcath (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) was inserted through the left popliteal vein. This case report outlines a possible challenging scenario that the vascular interventionist may encounter in dealing with COVID-19 patients with respiratory compromise in the prone position.

Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The decision for using supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still debatable. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the supine and prone position when performing PCNL. Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the database from MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from January 2009 to November 2019. The outcomes assessed were stone free rate, major complication rate, length of hospital stay and mean operation time. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The efficacy of PCNL in supine position as determined by stone free rate is significantly lower than in prone position (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66 - 0.83; p<0.00001), However, major complication rate is also lower in the supine group compared with the prone group (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51 - 0.96; p=0.03). There is no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay and mean operation time between both groups. Conclusion: Prone position leads to a higher stone free rate, but also a higher rate of major complication. Thus, the decision of using which position during PCNL should be based on the surgeon's experience and clinical aspects of the patients.

Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The decision for using supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still debatable. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the supine and prone position when performing PCNL. Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the database from MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from January 2009 to November 2019. The outcomes assessed were stone free rate, major complication rate, length of hospital stay and mean operation time. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The efficacy of PCNL in supine position as determined by stone free rate is significantly lower than in prone position (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66 - 0.83; p<0.00001), However, major complication rate is also lower in the supine group compared with the prone group (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51 - 0.96; p=0.03). There is no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay and mean operation time between both groups. Conclusion: Prone position leads to a higher stone free rate, but also a higher rate of major complication. Thus, the decision of using which position during PCNL should be based on the surgeon's experience and clinical aspects of the patients.

Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The decision for using supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still debatable. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the supine and prone position when performing PCNL. Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the database from MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from January 2009 to November 2019. The outcomes assessed were stone free rate, major complication rate, length of hospital stay and mean operation time. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The efficacy of PCNL in supine position as determined by stone free rate is significantly lower than in prone position (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66 - 0.83; p<0.00001), However, major complication rate is also lower in the supine group compared with the prone group (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51 - 0.96; p=0.03). There is no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay and mean operation time between both groups. Conclusion: Prone position leads to a higher stone free rate, but also a higher rate of major complication. Thus, the decision of using which position during PCNL should be based on the surgeon's experience and clinical aspects of the patients.

Positioning issues of spinal surgery during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Albeit rarely, different spinal pathologies may require surgical treatment during pregnancy. The management of such cases poses a series of challenges, starting with adequate body positioning.

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate limits and indications of the different surgical positioning strategies for pregnant women undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of literature about the described surgical positioning strategies used for spinal surgery during pregnancy, discussing advantages, indications, and limits. We also describe of a novel three-quarters prone positioning for dorsal pathology.

RESULTS

The surgical strategy may vary according to several factors, such as the location and the nature of the underlying pathology, the stage of the pregnancy, and the clinical condition of mother and fetus. During the second trimester, the habitus begins to raise issues about both the abdominal and the aortocaval compressions. The third trimester implies neonatal and ethical challenges: both fetal monitoring and the possibility of urgently proceeding to delivery should be guaranteed. The prone position is feasible during the second trimester provided an adequate frame is supplied. The lateral or three-quarters prone positioning may offer the safest option in the last stages of pregnancy, whereas both supine and sitting positionings are anecdotal.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational age, surgical comfort and maternofetal safety should be balanced by a multidisciplinary team to tailor an adequate positioning plan for each individual case. The early third trimester is the more limiting period because of the womb hindrance favoring lateral or three-quarters positionings.

Intraoperative Angiography for Arteriovenous Malformation Resection in the Prone and Lateral Positions, Using Upper Extremity Arterial Access

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative angiography is routinely utilized for aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) to verify complete occlusion and resection. Surgery for spinal and posterior fossa neurovascular lesions is usually performed in prone position. Intraoperative angiography in the prone position is challenging and there is no standardized protocol for this procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience with intraoperative angiography in the prone and lateral positions, using upper extremity arterial access.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with intraoperative angiography in the prone position between 2014 and 2015, where vascular access was obtained via the upper extremity arteries. Patients were treated in a hybrid endovascular operating room. High cervical and intracranial lesions were studied via brachial or radial access. All accesses were obtained using ultrasonographic guidance and a small caliber arterial sheath (4F).

RESULTS

Five patients were treated in the prone and lateral positions using brachial/radial artery access. Patients harbored cerebellar AVM, lateral medullary AVM, cervical arteriovenous fistula (AVF), tentorial dural AVF, and tentorial-incisural dural AVF. Patients were positioned prone (n = 2), semiprone (n = 2), and lateral (n = 1) for the surgery. Three patients were treated via right brachial artery access. Two patients were treated via radial arteries access. All patients tolerated the procedures without technical or clinical complications. Intraoperative angiography verified complete occlusion and resection in all cases prior to surgical closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative angiography in the prone and lateral positions using upper extremity access is an important adjunct. Brachial or radial access can be obtained safely and provides comfortable and quick approaches.

Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in supine versus prone position for patients with renal or upper ureteral calculi.

METHODS

A systematic search of Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify all eligible studies. All included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment and date extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 15 RCTs with 1474 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled data showed that PCNL in supine position could significantly reduce the operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -12.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.49 to -3.54, p = 0.005] and rate of fever [risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.97, p = 0.03] compared to prone position. In addition, no significant differences could be found between groups in stone-free rate (p = 0.31), hospital stay (p = 0.59) and rate of overall complications (p = 0.11), mainly including urinary leakage (p = 0.83), pleural effusion (p = 0.74) and blood transfusion (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found comparable stone-free rate and significant lower rate of postoperative fever in supine PCNL compared with prone PCNL. PCNL in supine position could be a safe and efficient choice for patients with renal or upper ureteral calculi.

Intraoperatively predicting postoperative sagittal balance using intraoperative X-rays

This study aimed to assess the correlation of sagittal balance parameters measured intraoperatively, against the gold standard post-operative standing full spine X-ray. A secondary aim was to create a predictive algorithm, that could be used intraoperatively to predict the post-operative balance. 49 patients, who underwent thoracolumbar spinal fusion over a 12-month period were included in this study. Standing full-spine X-rays were obtained both pre and post-surgical fixation. Parallel intraoperative X-rays were taken with the c-arm centred on femoral heads, operative level, S1 and L1. The sagittal parameters pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), spino-pelvic mismatch (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis were then measured and the correlations statistically analysed. For prone positioned patients the mean LL was 59.9° ± 10.6° intraoperatively (post-fixation) and post-operatively 55.4° ± 10.9° with a mean difference of -4.5° ± 6.1° (p-value < 0.001). For laterally positioned patients the mean LL was 50.9° ± 8.6° intraoperatively and 53.1° ± 10.1° postoperatively for a mean difference of -2.3° ± 6.5° (p-value = 0.117). The linear regression analysis resulted in a predictive algorithm that can be utilised intraoperatively to predict the post-operative standing pelvic mismatch for prone positioned patients. In conclusion, measuring spino-pelvic parameters of sagittal balance intraoperatively can be used to estimate postoperative standing full spine x-ray result. Specifically, in the prone position, the surgeon should aim for intraoperative lordosis that is 4.5° more than the desired post-operative lordosis. The predictive formula provides a direct method to quickly calculate the post-operative pelvic mismatch intraoperatively.