Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population

Objectives

Determining the accuracy of cycloplegic refractive error measurements made with the Spot Vision Screener (SVS, Welch Allyn Inc, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) is important for refractive assessment of uncooperative patients during optometric examinations. This study compared cycloplegic refractive errors measured by SVS and tabletop autorefractometer to cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-eight eyes of 44 subjects were examined in the study. Refractive error measurements were obtained under cycloplegia using retinoscopy, SVS, and Nidek ARK-530 tabletop autorefractometer (ARK-530, Nidek, Japan). Spherical and cylindrical values, spherical equivalents (SE), and Jackson cross-cylinder values at axes of 0° (J0) and 45° (J45) were recorded. Correlations between methods were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

The mean age was 7 years (range: 6 months-17 years). Sixteen (36%) of the subjects were female and 28 (64%) were male. For SE there was excellent agreement between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.924) and between retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.995). While there was a moderate correlation between retinoscopy and SVS for cylindrical values (ICC: 0.686), excellent correlation was detected between retinoscopy and autorefractometer (ICC: 0.966). J0 and J45 crosscylinder power values were not correlated between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.472) or retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.442). Retinoscopy was correlated with both SVS and tabletop autorefractometer for all parameters within ±1.96 standard deviations in Bland-Altman analysis.

Conclusion

Cycloplegic retinoscopy is the gold standard for refractive error measurement in the pediatric population. However, it requires time and experienced professionals. This study revealed moderate to good agreement between SVS and retinoscopy, with better agreement in spherical errors than cylindrical errors. Although the SVS is intended for screening programs, it may also be useful in the pediatric eye office to estimate spherical refractive error in uncooperative patients.

Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor

We determined the repeatability-reproducibility of refraction values and pupil size measured using the Spot Vision Screener and compare the obtained values with those measured using the binocular open-field autorefractor Grand Seiko WAM 5500 in healthy adults. This cross-sectional study included 22 eyes of 22 healthy adults with emmetropia to myopia. For each participant, spherical equivalent value, cylindrical value, and pupil size were measured in the right eye using the Spot Vision Screener and Grand Seiko autorefractor devices by two different orthoptists under two conditions: monocular and binocular (three consecutive refraction measurements). Repeatability-reproducibility of values measured using both devices were evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). The mean spherical equivalent value measured using the Spot Vision Screener was -2.79D in the monocular condition and -2.69D in binocular condition, which showed a small significant difference to those measured using the Grand Seiko autorefractor (-2.98D and -2.93D, respectively). The mean cylindrical value measured using the Spot Vision Screener was -0.59D in the monocular condition and -0.52D in the binocular condition, which showed a small significant difference compared with those measured using the Grand Seiko autorefractor in the binocular condition (-0.70D and -0.75D, respectively). Correlation coefficients of the spherical equivalent values, cylindrical values, and pupil sizes measured using both devices were R=0.959 (P<0.001), R=0.243 (P=0.260) and R=0.917 (P<0.001), respectively, in the monocular condition and R=0.962 (P<0.001), R=0.444 (P=0.040), and R=0.832 (P<0.001), respectively, in the binocular condition. ICC values of spherical equivalent value in intra-rater or inter-rater were more than 0.99 in both devices and conditions. ICC values of cylindrical values under the binocular condition in the Spot Vision Screener were 0.636 in intra-rater and 0.574 in inter-rater, which were lower than those of the Grand Seiko autorefractor (0.874 and 0.839, respectively). ICC values of pupil sizes under the binocular condition in the Spot Vision Screener were 0.871 in intra-rater and 0.760 in inter-rater, which were lower than those of the Grand Seiko autorefractor (0.967 and 0.943, respectively). The refractive value and pupil size obtained using the Spot Vision Screener showed high repeatability and reproducibility and were similar to the values obtained using the Grand Seiko autorefractor. Thus, the Spot Vision Screener, an automated vision screener, is a reliable portable refractor and pupillometry device for measuring refractive errors in clinical settings.

Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in comparison with the orthoptic examination in visual screening in 3-5 year-old schoolchildren

PURPOSE

To evaluate the Spot Vision Screener (SVS) compared with the orthoptic examination for detection of amblyopia risk factors in preschools.

METHODS

This prospective study included children with a visual screening organized by the department of "le" (PMI) in Côte d'Or (Burgundy, France), between June 2017 and April 2018. All children were evaluated with the SVS followed by a clinical orthoptic examination. Results with the SVS were compared with those obtained by clinical orthoptic examination.

RESULTS

A total of 1236 subjects were included in the study from 100 preschools. The mean age of the children was 3.6±0.7 years, and 627 were female (50.7%). The orthoptic examination detected 308 (24.9%) children with subnormal visual acuity for age in one eye or both. In children with a history of prematurity, the orthoptic examination was more frequently abnormal (P=0.002), which was not seen with the SVS (P=0.050). The SVS screened 20 (1.6%) children with strabismus, while 40 (3.2%) were detected by orthoptic examination. At the end of the screening, the SVS detected 182 (14.7%) suspect patients while 311 (25.1%) suspect patients were detected after the orthoptic examination. Comparing SVS with orthoptic examination, agreement was fair (κ=0.4).

CONCLUSION

The SVS can be a useful device for visual screening, but agreement with the orthoptic examination was only fair. The Spot vision screener should be used in conjunction with a clinical orthoptic examination.