Elbow arthroplasty in trauma-current concepts review

Introduction

Despite advancements in modern locking plate technology, distal humerus fractures in the elderly remain difficult to treat. A subset of fractures in this osteoporotic bone includes multiple, shallow articular fragments that renders fixation unreliable, precluding early motion and acceptable functional outcomes. Arthroplasty, in the form of either Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) or Distal Humeral Hemiarthroplasty (DHH) are alternative treatment options in this cohort and are being increasingly used.

Methods

This article reviews the use of TEA or DHH for acute distal humerus fracture, including patient selection, pre-operative planning, surgical approach, implant positioning, rehabilitation, outcomes and complications.

Results

Arthroplasties are being increasingly used for acute distal humerus fractures, however they introduce potential complications not seen with fixation. Due care must be employed to correct implant positioning which is a function of implant rotation, implant length and implant sizing. We describe a robust technique for epicondyle repair in DHH and unlinked TEA to avoid instability. Outcomes of DHH and TEA for acute distal humerus fracture are encouraging, however further long-term outcome and comparative data regarding arthroplasty is required.

Conclusions

Short to medium term outcomes demonstrate that both DHH and TEA are valuable options for selected patients, although attention to technique is required to minimise potential complications.

Staged revision still works for chronic and deep infection of total elbow arthroplasty?

Purpose: Infected total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is challenging. We evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes for chronic and deep infection of TEA with two-stage revision surgery. Methods: A total of 10 elbows were included in the study. The mean age was 69.1 ± 15 years (range, 34–83 years). The mean follow-up was 62 (range, 24–108) months. The clinical outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM) arc, and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Moreover, radiographic outcomes, time to revision, pathogenic bacteria, preoperative complications, and disease period were evaluated. Results: Mean preoperative VAS score of 6.1 had improved to 3.3. Mean preoperative ROM was 68° (flexion-extension), which improved to 86.7°. Mean preoperative MEPS was 46 (range, 0–70), which improved to 75.5 (range, 35–85). The mean disease duration was 8.4 months (range, 5–20 months). The most common causative organism was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The second revision rate was 80% at the final follow-up. Radiographic outcome at final follow-up showed that 3 (30%) of 10 patients exhibited radiolucency evidence around the components. Three patients showed nonprogressive radiolucency around the implant interfaces without other indications of infection at the most recent follow-up. Conclusion: In patients with chronic and deep infection of TEA, two-stage revision can be an affordable option for eradication of the infection, relieving pain, and restoring joint function. However, the high second revision rate owing to bone and soft-tissue deficits remains a critical issue.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Case series, Treatment study

Non-oncologic indication for elbow megaprothesis replacement: 2 cases report

Introduction

Treatment of elbow bone defects is still a huge challenge in orthopaedic in order to restore the shape and function of the elbow joint. Bone defect reconstruction is very difficult due to biomechanical complexity of the elbow joint and the poor coverage tissue of this area, so mega-prothesis can be considered the most optimal solution in these cases.

Case report

We present two clinical cases of megaprosthesis elbow replacement for treatment of bone defects caused by sequelae of trauma. There is one case of 3 cm bone defect at proximal ulna and one case of 3 cm bone defect at distal humerus. In the 1st case, the elbow joint is fusioned and the second case, the elbow joint is degenerated totally after 3 previous surgery. We performed total elbow replacement with a customized megaprosthesis for them. The Mayo elbow function assessment scale [1] pre-surgery was poor at 50 points. The average age is 35 years old. The mean post-operative follow-up time was 14 months. Range of elbow flexed motion was 135 degrees, both patients were maximally extension, the forearm pronation and supination were 90 and 75 degrees, respectively. The Mayo score is very good with 97,5 points. Both patients were completely satisfied with the postoperative results.

Conclusion

Our results show that megaprosthesis elbow replacement is a very effective option for cases large elbow bone defects due to trauma sequelae. However, careful preoperative preparation is required for the best outcome.

•

Megaprosthesis replacement is more popular for bone tumor around elbow

•

Massive bone defect sequelae around elbow after trauma is really challenged to treat successfully. It will be more difficult if there is a problem with elbow joint: stiffness, degeneration, or fusion. In the past, functional arthrodesis of elbow was the main indication to resolve this problem.

•

With the development of 3D technology and biomaterial science, megaprosthesis is the best solution for limb preservation after bone tumor wide resection.

•

Application of megaprosthesis was not only limited for bone tumor, but we can also use it in some rare non-oncologic case, especially around elbow.

•

We introduced 2 cases with posttraumatic massive bone loss of distal humerus and proximal ulnar which are treated by. megaprosthesis successfully.

Total elbow arthroplasty for acute distal humeral fractures with humeral condyle resection or retention: a long-term follow-up study

Background

Open reduction and internal fixation is the gold standard for the operative treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures. However, in elderly patients the approach involves a high rate of complications. We reviewed the long-term outcomes of 13 primary total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) performed to treat acute fractures in non-rheumatoid patients who at the time of trauma were aged less than 70 years. The aim of the study was to establish whether condyle retention enhances hinge stability and influences outcomes in these patients, who are younger than those who typically undergo TEA.

Methods

In 13 consecutive patients with acute distal humeral fractures aged 61-67 years, a linked semi-constrained Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis was implanted. The medial and lateral condylar bone fragments were resected (7 patients) or stabilized to the diaphysis using k-wires or plates (6 patients).

Results

At a mean follow-up of 12 years, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88 and patient satisfaction was 85%. Nine patients (70%) did not require surgical revision. All revisions involved the group managed by condyle resection.

Discussion

TEA can be considered in elderly subjects with acute distal humeral fracture. In our patients, resection of the medial and lateral condyle fragments did not influence outcomes, although clinical observation suggested that it involves greater mechanical stress on the hinge, heightening the long-term risk of bushing wear. Condyle fixation with plates or k-wires seems to afford longer implant survival and is recommended in younger patients with higher functional demands.

Humeral amputation following total elbow arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is associated with a relatively high complication rate, and exceptionally catastrophic complications might lead to amputation. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and aetiology of amputation performed at our institution in upper extremity limbs with a prior TEA.

METHODS

Between 1973 and 2018, 1906 consecutive TEAs were performed at our institution. Upper extremity amputation was performed in seven (0.36%) elbows with five transhumeral amputations and two shoulder disarticulations. The group consisted of five females and two males with a mean age of 64 years (range, 37-80). The index TEA had been performed for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 2), rheumatoid arthritis with acute fracture (n = 2), radiation associated nonunion (n = 2), and metastatic cancer (n = 1). Mean follow-up after amputation was three years (range, 3 months-5 years).

RESULTS

Mean time between amputation and TEA was 5 years (range, 2 months-13 years). The indications for amputation included uncontrolled deep infection in six (86%) elbows and tumor recurrence in one (14%) elbow. Only one elbow (14%) was fitted with a prosthesis. Six (86%) patients died at a mean of three years (range, 3 months-5 years) after amputation.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study highlight a low incidence of amputation after TEA. Most amputations were the direct result of TEA complications, with infection being the most common cause of amputation. Outcomes after amputation are concerning, with poor overall survival and few patients being fit for a prosthesis.

Total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

AIMS

The aims of this study were to validate the outcome of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify factors that affect the outcome.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and Embase from between January 2003 and March 2019. The primary aim was to determine the implant failure rate, the mode of failure, and risk factors predisposing to failure. A secondary aim was to identify the overall complication rate, associated risk factors, and clinical performance. A meta-regression analysis was completed to identify the association between each parameter with the outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies including 2,118 TEAs were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 80.9 months (8.2 to 156). The implant failure and complication rates were 16.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.128 to 0.200) and 24.5% (95% CI 0.203 to 0.293), respectively. Aseptic loosening was the most common mode of failure (9.5%; 95% CI 0.071 to 0.124). The mean postoperative ranges of motion (ROMs) were: flexion 131.5° (124.2° to 138.8°), extension 29.3° (26.8° to 31.9°), pronation 74.0° (67.8° to 80.2°), and supination 72.5° (69.5° to 75.5°), and the mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 89.3 (95% CI 86.9 to 91.6). The meta-regression analysis identified that younger patients and implants with an unlinked design correlated with higher failure rates. Younger patients were associated with increased complications, while female patients and an unlinked prosthesis were associated with aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSION

TEA continues to provide satisfactory results for patients with RA. However, it is associated with a substantially higher implant failure and complication rates compared with hip and knee arthroplasties. The patient's age, sex, and whether cemented fixation and unlinked prosthesis were used can influence the outcome. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):967-980.

Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation with total elbow arthroplasty for intra-articular distal humeral fractures in older age: a retrospective study

Background

Intra-articular distal humeral fractures can be surgically challenging. It remains under discussion whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is more beneficial for treatment of the elderly. This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of ORIF and TEA for managing intra-articular distal humerus fractures in patients aged 65 years or older.

Methods

Patients who underwent ORIF (n=28) or TEA (n=43) for in intra-articular distal humerus fracture between May 2008 and December 2018 were reviewed. Range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, radiologic outcomes, and surgical complications were evaluated at the final follow-up visit.

Results

The ORIF and TEA groups showed a mean arc of flexion–extension of 97°±21° and 101°±12°, respectively. The mean MEPS and DASH scores were 94±15 and 27±12 points, respectively, in the ORIF group and 81±27 and 47±28 points in the TEA group. This difference was statistically significant. The incidence of total complications was similar between the groups.

Conclusions

In patients older than 65 years with intra-articular distal humerus fracture, ORIF had better outcomes than TEA.

A review of the New Zealand National Joint Registry to compare the outcomes of Coonrad-Morrey and Latitude total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty has traditionally been used in the treatment of inflammatory arthropathy patients. More and more, however, its use is expanding to include acute trauma and sequelae of trauma. In New Zealand, the most commonly used prosthesis is the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis, but the Latitude prosthesis has gained in popularity, with a 3-fold increase in implantation over the past 5 years.

METHODS

Prospectively collected national joint registry data were used to compare the survival rates of these prostheses. Underlying diagnoses, reasons for revision, and patient-reported outcome measures, as well as patient age and exact implants used, were all recorded. Statistical analysis involved survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and the paired Student t test.

RESULTS

Over the 18-year study interval, the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis has shown consistently lower revision rates than the Latitude prosthesis. This was true for both the linked and unlinked Latitude prostheses and was not affected by radial head replacement or underlying diagnosis. In all cases, the risk of revision for the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis was reduced by at least 65% compared with the Latitude prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

This study using New Zealand Joint Registry data shows a lower failure rate of the Coonrad-Morrey elbow prosthesis compared with the Latitude prosthesis. The hazard ratio for a revision procedure for the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis compared with the Latitude prosthesis was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.55). This lower rate was evident irrespective of linkage and radial head replacement. The reason for the lower rate of revision with the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis is likely multifactorial, but perhaps when used by lower-volume surgeons, the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis may confer better implant longevity.

Challenges and Solutions in Management of Distal Humerus Fractures

Background

Management of distal humerus fractures remains a challenge for trauma surgeons and advancements in treatment options continue to be made to achieve the best results for patients presenting with these complex fractures. Our aim in this article is to provide the surgeons with a detailed review of current literature to help them make an evidence based decision when faced with managing such complex injuries in their surgical practice.

Methods

This is a comprehensive review of the current literature that details various aspects of distal distal humerus fractures such as classification, surgical anatomy, surgical approaches, treatment options, choices of devices, outcomes and complications.

Results

With the advancements in techniques and equipment, there has been improvement in patients' outcomes following surgical management of these fractures and a large proportion of these patients are able to achieve pre-injury level of function. The contoured locking plates have enabled successful fixation of many of these fractures that were previously considered unfixable. For those not amenable to surgical fixation, total elbow arthroplasty and elbow hemiarthroplasty are considered as good alternatives.

Conclusion

Since the days where the 'bag of bones' technique was the preferred method of treating these complex injuries, techniques and outcomes have advanced greatly. However, they still present a significant technical challenge and need meticulous technique and experience to achieve optimal results.

Partial humeral replacement for peri-prosthetic fractures of the humerus

INTRODUCTION

Treating peri-prosthetic fractures of the humerus can be very challenging, especially when there is poor bone stock and in the presence of adjacent joint prostheses. We discuss the option of a partial humeral replacement as a salvage procedure for such cases with some technical comments.

METHODS

This paper presents a technique which utilises a custom- made cemented connector to incorporate the existing well functioning elbow or shoulder replacement with a commercially available partial humeral replacement (PHR) or to an existing prosthetic humeral stem.

RESULTS

Our series involves 6 patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis, all female, with a mean age of 62.5 years. Their surgeries were performed over a span of 10 years, with an average follow up of 49 months. All had a well functioning implant at final follow-up, with a mean Mayo Elbow Performance score of 65. There were no cases of infection, nerve injury or dislocation in our patients. There were 2 deaths in our series, from unrelated medical causes at 2 and 4 years following their surgery.

CONCLUSION

Although a partial humeral replacement connected to a well functioning implant is a rare procedure for salvage of a humeral peri-prosthetic fracture, it can be a viable option in certain patient populations. Every attempt should be made to maintain the secondary shoulder stabilisers at the proximal humerus as a functioning unit.

[Allograft reconstruction in revision elbow arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge on composite allograft reconstructions in revision elbow arthroplasty. A major reason for the restricted use of freshly frozen allografts is the divergent legal requirements for allograft procurement in European countries.

RESULTS

The opportunities and limitations of this complex revision surgery of the elbow are outlined based on our own restricted experiences, as well as on current literature. Our experience is in accordance with that of other institutions. The results are heterogeneous and range from satisfying to poor. The main problems are the increased risk of infection and the lack of allograft incorporation. Therefore, salvage procedures such as resection arthroplasty still need to be considered. It is not possible to define universally applicable treatment guidelines due to the limited caseload, even when an acceptable functional outcome can be achieved in the majority of cases. Due to the lack of a "simple solution" or valid guidelines, treatment strategies should be individualized for each patient. Complications such as infection and failed allograft incorporation represent the key issues of this procedure and remain a major challenge in revision surgery.

Pulmonary cement embolism in a child following total elbow replacement for primitive neuroectodermal tumour (PNET) of the humerus

Pulmonary bone cement embolism (PCE) is an uncommon event occurring after implantation of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in orthopaedic surgeries involving adult patients, more so in the elderly. Its incidence in the paediatric population is extremely rare. We herein describe a case of PCE in a 15-year-old girl, 9 days after she underwent total elbow replacement with PMMA placement for a primitive neuroectodermal tumour (PNET) of the distal humerus. This report describes the occurrence of a common post-operative complication of bone cement embolism in an uncommon scenario of total elbow replacement for a bone tumour in a child, which masqueraded initially as acute pneumonitis.

[Preliminary application of three dimensional printing personalized navigation template in assisting total elbow replacement for patients with elbow tumor]

Objective

To explore the clinical methods of resection of elbow tumor and total elbow replacement with custom personalized prosthesis based on three dimensional (3-D) printing navigation template.

Methods

In August 2016, a 63-year-old male patient with left elbow joint tumor was treated, with the discovery of the left distal humerus huge mass over 3 months, with elbow pain, activity limitation of admission. Computer-assisted reduction technique combined with 3-D printing was used to simulate preoperative tumor resection, a customized personal prosthesis was developed; tumor was accurately excised during operation, and the clinical result was evaluated after operation.

Results

The time was 46 minutes for tumor resection, and was 95 minutes for personalized implant and allograft bone without fluoroscopy. X-ray and CT examination at 1 week after operation showed good position of artificial elbow joint; the anteversion of ulna prosthesis was 30° and the elbow carrying angle was 15°, which were consistent with the simulated results before surgery. The finger flexion was normal at 1 month after operation; the range of motion was 0-130° for elbow flexion and extension, 80° for forearm pronation, and 80° for forearm supination. The elbow function was able to meet the needs of daily life at 7 months after operation, and no recurrence and metastasis of tumor were observed.

Conclusion

For limb salvage of elbow joint, computer aided design can make preoperative surgical simulation; the navigation template can improve surgical precision; and the function of elbow joint can be reconstructed with customized and personlized prosthesis for total elbow replacement.

Linked semiconstrained and unlinked total elbow replacement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case comparison series with mean 11.7-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Few series report the results of total elbow replacement (TER) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Most report the use of a linked implant. There are theoretical benefits to using an unlinked prosthesis, and thus we report our experience of the clinical benefit and survivorship of both this implant and a linked semiconstrained prosthesis.

METHODS

There were 21 elbows replaced in 14 JIA patients (12 women and 2 men; 14 unlinked, 7 linked). Mean age at surgery was 39.5 years (range, 26-52 years). Mean clinical follow-up was 11.7 years (range, 5.4-17.6 years).

RESULTS

Reoperation, including implant revision, was required in 9 elbows (42.9%). Using revision as an end point, survivorship was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74%-99%) at 5 years and 68% (95% CI, 45%-86%) at 10 years. The 10-year survival was 70% (95% CI, 40%-89%) for the unlinked group and 69% (95% CI, 28%-94%) for the linked group. The need for bilateral TER was found to be a risk factor for revision within 10 years of primary surgery (6/11 vs. 0/7 elbows; P = .037). The rate of aseptic loosening seen on radiographs was high in the unlinked group (12/14, 85.7%), but many of these patients continue to function well without need for revision.

CONCLUSION

Both the unlinked Kudo 5 and linked Coonrad-Morrey prostheses for TER can provide benefits in the long-term for most patients with JIA. The need for bilateral TER in this group is associated with higher rate of revision at 10 years.

[Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow joint : Endoprosthetic options in young patients]

BACKGROUND

In young patients, post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow is a rare condition. Whereas clinical manifestations often differ from radiological findings, pain and stiffness are variably combined in symptomatic forms. In deciding whether to perform surgery, the patient's age, activity level, and symptoms, as well as the location and severity of the osteoarthritis have to be taken into account. Elbow joint instability has to be identified to stop the post-traumatic osteoarthritic progress. If joint preserving surgical methods fail, diverse options for partial or total joint replacement are available.

THERAPY

The treatment goal in young patients, therefore, is to reduce pain with a sufficient range of elbow motion.

Factors affecting choice of open surgical techniques in elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the clinical outcomes of stiff elbow open treatment to assess factors affecting the choice of surgical procedures in a consecutive series of patients followed up prospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients, mean aged 48 years, were evaluated. Elbow stiffness was caused by post-traumatic osteoarthritis in 32 patients, primary osteoarthritis in seven and rheumatoid arthritis in two. Stiffness was classified as mixed and extrinsic in 28 and 13 cases, respectively. Seventeen ulno-humeral arthroplasties (UHA), seven UHA with radiocapitellar replacement, six UHA with radial head replacement, ten total elbow replacement and one UHA with anconeus interposition were performed. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), modified-American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (m-ASES) and Q-DASH scores were used for the pre- and post-operative evaluation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 25 months. The average increase in MEPS and m-ASES was 45 and 41, respectively. The average decrease in Q-DASH and the average increase in m-ASES pain were 43 and 21, respectively. The mean increase in flection, extension, pronation and supination was 29°, 25°, 18° and 17°, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Strictly customized open surgery of elbow stiffness, by taking into account the clinical value of each patient's pathoanatomical conditions, yields satisfactory functional results in majority of cases. In particular, the degree and site of elbow cartilage wear proved to be the factors affecting the choice of treatment most. Treatment should be aimed at removing the causes of pain and at recovering range of motion.