1
|
Ferro M, Crocetto F, Tataru S, Barone B, Dolce P, Lucarelli G, Sonpavde G, Musi G, Antonelli A, Veccia A, Terracciano D, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Marchioni M, Schips L, Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Carrieri G, Lasorsa F, Verde A, Scafuri L, Buonerba C, Di Lorenzo G. Predictors of Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:574-583. [PMID: 37419854 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several programmed death ligand-1 (PD1/L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS To address the need for predictors of the efficacy of ICIs in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), randomized controlled trials of PD1/L1 inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy in this patient population were systematically reviewed, and differences in ICI-associated survival outcomes according to available baseline variables were quantitatively assessed. RESULTS The quantitative analysis included 6524 patients with mUC. No visceral metastatic site (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) and high PDL-1 expression (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.640.87) were significantly associated with a reduced risk of death. CONCLUSION Treatment with an ICI-containing regimen was associated with a reduced risk of death in mUC patients, which was associated with PDL-1 expression and metastatic site. Further research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Sabin Tataru
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Dolce
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology and Phase I Section, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Urology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Verde
- Department of Urology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Luca Scafuri
- Oncology Unit, Hospital "Andrea Tortora," ASL Salerno, Pagani, Italy; Associazione O.R.A., Somma Vesuviana, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- Oncology Unit, Hospital "Andrea Tortora," ASL Salerno, Pagani, Italy; Associazione O.R.A., Somma Vesuviana, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
- Oncology Unit, Hospital "Andrea Tortora," ASL Salerno, Pagani, Italy; Associazione O.R.A., Somma Vesuviana, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marshall S, Wakatsuki T, Takahari D, Matsushima T, Ishizuka N, Nakayama I, Osumi H, Ogura M, Ichimura T, Shinozaki E, Chin K, Yamaguchi K. Prognostic Factors in Patients with Advanced HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Trastuzumab-Based Chemotherapy: a Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:475-484. [PMID: 35435573 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00815-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy remain controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical factors that predict prognosis in patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of HER2-positive gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy at our institution. Clinical features and laboratory test results that considered prognostic factors were re-examined. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed with the log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS A total of 133 patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer were enrolled. The median OS in this cohort was 18.7 months. Four prognostic factors: visceral metastasis (lung or liver), levels of hemoglobin (Hb) (< 11.6 g/dl), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (> 222 mg/dl), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (> 0.14 mg/dl), were identified as independent prognostic factors. The patients were placed into three groups according to their number of prognostic factors. These included low (0, 1), moderate (2, 3), and high (4) risk factors. The OS was separated into three categories with a median OS of 32.0, 18.7, and 10.1 months, respectively. Compared to the low-risk group, hazard ratios for the moderate- and high-risk groups were 1.75 and 3.49, respectively. CONCLUSION Visceral metastasis and abnormal Hb, LDH, and CRP levels were associated with unfavorable OS. These findings may be beneficial for the management of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoko Marshall
- Department of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takeru Wakatsuki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Takahari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Matsushima
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Naoki Ishizuka
- Department of Clinical Trial Planning and Management, Clinical Research & Medical Development Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Izuma Nakayama
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hiroki Osumi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Mariko Ogura
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takashi Ichimura
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Keisho Chin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Urbanski A, Minnemann J, Mauch C, Schmidt T, Kreuzberg N, Schlaak M, Bruns CJ, Stippel DL, Wahba R. Oligometastatic disease and visceral resections in advanced malignant melanoma: a propensity-matched analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:53. [PMID: 36680624 PMCID: PMC9867670 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02804-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Malignant melanoma is among the tumours with the highest increase in incidence of solid tumours in Germany. While most patients are diagnosed at an early stage and show a good prognosis, advanced stages of malignant melanoma are accompanied with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Comparable to other tumour entities, the resection of visceral metastases could lead to a better prognosis. Supplementary, the subgroup of oligometastatic patients might benefit from surgical therapy to a greater extent. METHODS This retrospective study analysed 351 patients treated between 2006 and 2017 at the University Hospital of Cologne. A total of 121 patients showed visceral metastases, with which we compared patients with a diffuse tumour spread to patients in an oligometastatic state. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of visceral resection of oligometastatic, malignant melanoma. RESULTS Our analysis showed that patients with an oligometastatic malignant melanoma had a significantly better prognosis than patients with a diffuse pattern of metastases, if they showed visceral metastases. Furthermore, the resection of visceral metastases leads to a significant gain in median overall survival time (13.6 vs. 34.2 months) and in progression-free survival (9.6 vs. 3.8 months). CONCLUSION The resection of visceral metastases is a rational treatment option in advanced malignant melanoma. Although our study is limited by a small cohort of patients (n = 18), we believe that the resection of visceral metastases will be fundamental in the treatment of malignant melanoma. In particular, patients in an oligometastatic stage could be an eligible group for surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Urbanski
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Julia Minnemann
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk L Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roger Wahba
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kolben T, Bardenhewer M, Kolben TM, Rickerl L, Degenhardt T, Mahner S, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Metastatic Breast Cancer: Is There a Differential Therapy Efficacy between Visceral and Non-Visceral Metastatic Breast Cancer? Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:527-533. [PMID: 33223997 DOI: 10.1159/000504527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Differential efficacy of newly registered therapies in subgroups of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an important consideration for subsequent use in clinical practice. Unfortunately, such subgroup analyses often are exploratory and rarely statistically adequately powered and may thus be misleading. This analysis aimed to explore a potentially different treatment response to i.v. therapies between visceral and non-visceral MBC. Methods In a systematic literature analysis (PubMed) comprising phase III registration studies for MBC from 1994 to 2014, differences in outcome were evaluated regarding progression-free survival, time to progression, overall survival (OS), and visceral versus non-visceral disease. The impact of HER2 and hormone receptor status was also considered. A total of 16 studies comprising 13,083 patients were selected by considering the information given in the medical product's professional information and the decision of the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicine Agency for approval of the respective therapeutic agents now used in the treatment of MBC. Results No statistically significant differences regarding treatment response and therapy benefit were found in MBC patients with visceral versus non-visceral metastases based on reported hazard ratios and confidence intervals in registration trials. Interesting but nonsignificant differences were found regarding a distinct therapy benefit regarding different metastasis locations in 4 studies. Conclusion For targeted i.v. therapies based on biomarker selection, there is a trend - although not significant - toward a benefit (OS) from combination therapies favoring visceral disease. However, at the present time, metastasis localization should not be used as a predictive marker for choice of systemic therapy in MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Bardenhewer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Theresa M Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura Rickerl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hirotsu Y, Hada M, Amemiya K, Oyama T, Mochizuki H, Omata M. Multi-regional sequencing reveals clonal and polyclonal seeding from primary tumor to metastases in advanced gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 2020; 55:553-564. [PMID: 31912238 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-019-01659-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor metastases to lymph nodes and distant organs are associated with worse prognosis in gastric cancer. However, little is known about the genetic profiles, subclonal architecture, and evolutional processes across primary tumors and metastases. METHODS We analyzed the genetic alterations of 106 multiregional samples including primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and visceral metastases from 10 patients with advanced gastric cancer. Histologically different portions were obtained by laser-capture microdissection. We reconstructed the subclonal architectures and inferred the primary to lymph or visceral metastatic seeding patterns. RESULTS The different histological portions in primary tumors had common mutations, suggesting common ancestral tumor origins transformed into distinct histological types. In almost all cases, TP53 mutations were identified as clonal mutations across primary tumors and metastases. Subclonal reconstruction and phylogenetic analysis showed primary tumors were classified into monoclonal or polyclonal tumors. All monoclonal primary tumors disseminated as metastases with the same tumor composition (100%, 26/26 samples). In contrast, polyclonal primary tumors mainly spread as metastases by way of polyclonal seeding (84%: 37/44 samples). CONCLUSIONS Clonal mutations were maintained at both the primary and metastatic sites and genetic divergence of these was low. These findings shed light on the genetic basis of primary tumor dissemination and metastatic processes in advanced gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Hirotsu
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan.
| | - Masao Hada
- Department of Surgery, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan
| | - Kenji Amemiya
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan
| | - Toshio Oyama
- Department of Pathology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Mochizuki
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan
| | - Masao Omata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan.,The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lun DX, Chen NW, Feng JT, Yang XG, Xu ZW, Li F, Hu YC. Visceral Metastasis: A Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases. Orthop Surg 2020; 12:552-560. [PMID: 32227458 PMCID: PMC7189062 DOI: 10.1111/os.12657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To characterize the visceral metastasis as a predictive tool for the survival of patients with spinal metastases through an exploratory meta‐analysis. Methods Two investigators independently searched PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies from 2000–2016. The effect estimates for the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled with a random‐ or fixed‐effect model. Results In total, 18 eligible studies were retrieved with 5468 participants from nine countries. The overall pooled effect size for HR and RR was 1.50 and 3.79, respectively, which was proved to be statistically significant. In the subgroup of prostate cancer (PCa) and non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), statistical significance and marginal statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.35–2.29) and (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.99–2.48), respectively. However, in the subgroup of thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and renal cancer, statistical significance was not achieved (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.75–1.83, Z = 0.70, P = 0.486). The results did not show any evidence of publication bias. Conclusions This study demonstrated that visceral metastasis was a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases as a whole. Interestingly, the onset of visceral metastases differentially impacted the survival in different primary tumors. Therefore, the prognostic value of visceral metastasis might be related to the type of primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deng-Xing Lun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Nai-Wang Chen
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Jiang-Tao Feng
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xion-Gang Yang
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhao-Wan Xu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Yong-Cheng Hu
- Department of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Esin E, Oksuzoglu B, Bilici A, Cicin I, Kostek O, Kaplan MA, Aksoy S, Aktas BY, Ozdemir O, Alacacioglu A, Cabuk D, Sumbul AT, Sakin A, Paydas S, Yetisir E, Er O, Korkmaz T, Yildirim N, Sakalar T, Demir H, Artac M, Karaagac M, Harputluoglu H, Bilen E, Erdur E, Degirmencioglu S, Aliyev A, Cil T, Olgun P, Basaran G, Gumusay O, Demir A, Tanrikulu E, Yumuk PF, Imamoglu I, Oyan B, Cetin B, Haksoyler V, Karadurmus N, Erturk I, Evrensel T, Yilmaz H, Beypinar I, Kocer M, Pilanci KN, Seker M, Urun Y, Yildirim N, Eren T, Demirci U. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane-based treatment for visceral organ metastatic, trastuzumab-naïve breast cancer: real-life practice outcomes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 83:131-143. [PMID: 30377778 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3712-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to describe the real-life practice outcomes of pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane (PTT) combination in visceral organ metastatic, trastuzumab-naive breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS This study was conducted by Turkish Oncology Group and included 317 patients' data from 36 centers. RESULTS Median age was 51 (22-82). Median PFS was 28.5 months, while median OS was 40.3 months. Patients with brain metastases (n: 13, 4.1%) had worse PFS (16.8 m vs. 28.5 m; p = 0.002) and OS (26.7 m vs. 40.3 m; p = 0.009). Patients older than 65 years of age (n: 42, 13.2%) had significantly lower OS results (19.8 m vs. 40.3 m; p = 0.01). Two hundred sixty-eight patients (86.7%) received docetaxel while 37 patients (11.7%) received paclitaxel. PFS and OS were similar between taxane groups. In eight patients (2.5%), 5-40% ejection fraction decrement from baseline was detected without any clinical sign of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS Our RLP trial included only visceral metastatic, trastuzumab-naïve BC patients including cases with brain involvement who received PTT combination in the first-line treatment. Regardless of negative prognostic characteristics, our results are in parallel with pivotal trial. Further strategies for brain metastasis should be developed to improve outcomes despite encouraging results with PTT treatment. Taxane selection can be personalized and endocrine maintenance may further improve outcomes after taxanes were discontinued. To our knowledge, this is the largest scale real-life clinical practice study of pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane therapy to date.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/secondary
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Lobular/secondary
- Docetaxel/administration & dosage
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Rate
- Trastuzumab/administration & dosage
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ece Esin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - B Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
| | - A Bilici
- Departmant of Medical Oncology, Medipol University International Health Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - I Cicin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - O Kostek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - M A Kaplan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - S Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B Y Aktas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, İzmir K.C. University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - A Alacacioglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, İzmir K.C. University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - D Cabuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Izmit, Turkey
| | - A T Sumbul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - A Sakin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S Paydas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - E Yetisir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - O Er
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Korkmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - N Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - T Sakalar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - H Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - M Artac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Medical Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - M Karaagac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Medical Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - H Harputluoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - E Bilen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - E Erdur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Degirmencioglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| | - A Aliyev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Cil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adana City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Adana, Turkey
| | - P Olgun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adana City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Adana, Turkey
| | - G Basaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - O Gumusay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey
| | - A Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - E Tanrikulu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - P F Yumuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Inanc Imamoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Diskapi Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B Oyan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - B Cetin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, RTE University, Rize, Turkey
| | - V Haksoyler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Diyarbakir G.Y. Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - N Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Evrensel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - H Yilmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - I Beypinar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey
| | - M Kocer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isparta S.D University, Isparta, Turkey
| | - K N Pilanci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haseki Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M Seker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bayindir Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Y Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Eren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - U Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marcoval J, Ferreres JR, Martín C, Gómez S, Penín RM, Ochoa de Olza M, Fabra Á. Patterns of visceral metastasis in cutaneous melanoma: a descriptive study. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2013; 104:593-7. [PMID: 23876678 DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2012.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2012] [Accepted: 12/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Some types of cancer tend to spread to certain organs. In the case of melanoma, uveal melanoma spreads almost exclusively to the liver, while cutaneous melanoma spreads to the liver and other organs. Although important advances have been made in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying melanoma, few recent studies have focused on the patterns of visceral metastasis in cutaneous melanoma. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether clinicopathologic variants of cutaneous melanoma and primary tumor site might be associated with pattern and time of onset of metastasis to visceral sites, including the central nervous system (CNS). MATERIALS AND METHODS We included patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma between 1988 and 2009 with at least 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS Of the 1083 patients studied, 92 developed visceral metastasis. The CNS was affected in 21 cases, the lungs in 24, the liver in 17, the digestive tract in 7, and multiple organs simultaneously in 23. Metastasis to the lungs, the liver, and the digestive tract occurred within 5 years in most cases, while metastasis to the CNS and multiple organs occurred later (>5 years in 38% and 43% of cases, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Unlike uveal melanoma, cutaneous melanoma spreads to different organs without any particular predilection. We observed no significant associations between the site of visceral metastasis and either clinicopathologic variant or location of the primary tumor. Metastasis occurred within 5 years of diagnosis in most cases, but it can occur after 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Marcoval
- Servicio de Dermatología, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|