Effectiveness of wound contact layers in enabling undisturbed wound management: a case series

OBJECTIVE

Wound contact layers (WCLs) are intended to protect and support wounds during the healing process. An open, non comparative, case series clinical evaluation was undertaken to assess the impact of these dressings on establishing an undisturbed wound environment that supports effective wound management, and to allow the establishment of limits of duration of the wear time for the experimental WCLs.

METHOD

The primary objectives of this clinical evaluation were to assess the ability of the WCLs to prevent tissue disturbance to the wound and surrounding skin and for the clinicians to have confidence to extend the wear time of the WCL dressings. For them to have confidence in leaving the dressings in place for extended periods, the assessment of the wound and periwound skin condition and an assessment of patient comfort was performed: assessment of wound and periwound condition in relation to tissue adherence of the dressing to the wound resulting in tissue damage/bleeding (to wound and/or periwound skin) and cellular infiltration into the WCL; assessment of patient wearing comfort and satisfaction; assessment of WCL wear time, relating to times between dressing changes as judged by the clinician.

RESULTS

Based upon five parameters used to assess the extent to which the WCLs Atrauman, Atrauman Silicone and Atrauman Ag (HARTMANN, Germany) disturbed the underlying tissues-bleeding, wound tissue damage, periwound skin damage, tissue ingrowth and dressing adherence-the majority (>95%) of assessments indicated low or no disturbance of tissue. Over the 14 days of study assessment, the mean (±standard deviation) wear time was 7.3±1.2 days for the Atrauman group, 9.9±2.8 days for the Atrauman Silicone group, and 5.8±1.0 days for the Atrauman Ag group. All dressings were well tolerated by patients and rated highly in terms of in-use dressing performance.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that Atrauman WCLs are suitable for the management of a variety of wounds as they promote an undisturbed wound environment, including extended wear time.

Correlation of twin-block appliance efficacy and wear durationas assessed with a compliance indicator

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between objective wear time and treatment efficacy of a twin block (TB) appliance.

METHODS

A TB appliance incorporating a compliance indicator was delivered to 44 children in the age group of 11-14 years (25 boys and 19 girls). Participants were instructed to wear the appliance full time and were recalled at 3-4- week intervals. Cephalograms and study models were taken at baseline and after 6 months of appliance therapy.

RESULTS

Data from 41 of the 44 participants were analyzed. A wide variation in daily wear time among participants was observed. Based on wear time, they were divided into full time (FT >17 h/d) and part time (PT < 12 h/d) wear groups. Mean wear durations were 20.86 hours in the FT-wear group and 9.55 hours in the PT-wear group. In skeletal changes, the ANB (A point, nasion, B point) angle was reduced by 2.69° in the FT-wear group, and 1.33° in the PT-wear group, and statistically significant increases were seen for the mandibular base measurement (Pg/OLp) in the FT-wear group (2.22mm), compared with those in the PT-wear group (0.44mm). . In dental changes, overjet were reduced by 3.91 mm and 2.0 mm in the FT-wear and PT-wear group, respectively. This difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal effects were pronounced in the FT-wear group, and dentoalveolar changes were comparable in the 2 wear groups. The maximum skeletal treatment effect of a TB appliance was found to occur with FT wear over a 6-month treatment period.

Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents

Background

Accelerometers are widely used to measure sedentary time and daily physical activity (PA). However, data collection and processing criteria, such as non-wear time rules might affect the assessment of total PA and sedentary time and the associations with health variables. The study aimed to investigate whether the choice of different non-wear time definitions would affect the outcomes of PA levels in youth.

Methods

Seventy-seven healthy youngsters (44 boys), aged 10–17 years, wore an accelerometer and kept a non-wear log diary during 4 consecutives days. We compared 7 published algorithms (10, 15, 20, 30, 60 min of continuous zeros, Choi, and Troiano algorithms). Agreements of each algorithm with the log diary method were assessed using Bland-Altmans plots and by calculating the concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures.

Results

Variations in time spent in sedentary and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) were 30 and 3.7%. Compared with the log diary method, greater discrepancies were found for the algorithm 10 min (p < 0.001). For the time assessed in sedentary, the agreement with diary was excellent for the 4 algorithms (Choi, r = 0.79; Troiano, r = 0.81; 30 min, r = 0.79; 60 min, r = 0.81). Concordance for each method was excellent for the assessment of time spent in MVPA (> 0.86). The agreement for the wear time assessment was excellent for 5 algorithms (Choi r = 0.79; Troiano r = 0.79; 20 min r = 0.77; 30 min r = 0.80; 60 min r = 0.80).

Conclusions

The choice of non-wear time rules may considerably affect the sedentary time assessment in youth. Using of appropriate data reduction decision in youth is needed to limit differences in associations between health outcomes and sedentary behaviors and may improve comparability for future studies. Based on our results, we recommend the use of the algorithm of 30 min of continuous zeros for defining non-wear time to improve the accuracy in assessing PA levels in youth.

Trial registration

NCT02844101 (retrospectively registered at July 13th 2016).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0712-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Selecting appropriate postoperative dressings to support wound healing and reduce surgical site infection

The appropriate choice of postoperative dressing supports effective wound healing by providing a moist wound environment and reducing the risk of surgical site infection and blistering. Wound management is complex and practitioners need to consider the location of the wound, method of wound closure, expected exudate level and length of time the dressing needs to remain in place when selecting a product. The correct dressing selection will have a positive impact wound healing and the patient's quality of life.

A comparison of the in vitro moisture vapour transmission rate and in vivo fluid-handling capacity of six adhesive foam dressings to a newly reformulated adhesive foam dressing

This study compared moisture vapour transmission rate (MVTR) and wear time or fluid-handling capacities of six adhesive foam dressings to a reformulated control dressing. Standardised in vitro MVTR methodology and a previously published in vivo artificial wound model (AWM) were used. Mean inverted MVTR for the reformulated dressing was 12 750 g/m(2) /24 hours and was significantly higher than four of the six comparator dressings (P < 0·0001), which ranged from 830 to 11 360 g/m(2) /24 hours. Mean upright MVTR for the reformulated dressing was 980 g/m(2) /24 hours and was significantly different than all of the comparator dressings (P < 0·0001), which ranged from 80 to 1620 g/m(2) /24 hours (three higher/three lower). The reformulated dressing median wear time ranged from 6·1 to >7·0 days, compared with 1·0 to 3·5 days for the comparator dressings (P = 0·0012 to P < 0·0001). The median fluid volume handled ranged from 78·0 to >87 ml compared with 13·0 to 44·5 ml for the comparator dressings (P = 0·0007 to P < 0·001). Interestingly, inverted MVTR did not correspond well to the AWM. These results suggest that marked differences exist between the dressings in terms of both MVTR and wear time or fluid-handling capacity. Furthermore, high inverted MVTR does not necessarily predict longer wear time or fluid-handling capacities of absorbent dressings.