Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and related mimics with updates. When is molecular testing most cost-effective, necessary, and indicated?

The classification and work-up of adipocytic neoplasms remains challenging and sometimes controversial. Since its initial description by Dr. Enterline, the variety of subtypes and morphological appearances considered to represent the spectrum of atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) has expanded, resulting in significant morphologic overlap with other entities, including the recently described atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumor (ASPLT), conventional spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma (SPL), and so-called "low-grade" forms of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DL). Nevertheless, the distinction of most examples of ALT/WDL from lipomas/lipoma-like lesions is easily performed on routine histologic examination but can be problematic if the characteristic atypical cells are poorly represented, particularly in small biopsy specimens, obscured by other cellular elements (inflammation), or simply not recognized. The discovery that lipomatous tumors harbor specific and unique karyotypes and molecular events has resulted in ancillary tests that can help provide more accurate diagnoses, especially in less-than-optimal scenarios. Confirmation of MDM2 immunohistochemical over-expression and detection of the MDM2 gene rearrangement via fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) have proven particularly reliable and useful. While FISH analysis for MDM2 gene amplification may be helpful for confirming (or excluding) ALT/WDL, it also can lead to overutilization and overdependence. Furthermore, a small subset of otherwise typical ALT/WDL lack MDM2 gene amplification, employing alternative molecular pathways. The recent recognition of ASPLT has introduced a tumor easily mistaken morphologically for ALT/WDL, often exhibiting bizarre and pleomorphic lipoblasts, but lacking the underlying molecular abnormalities and subsequent risk of dedifferentiation. ASPLT also have overlapping features with the better-established SPL but with a greater tendency to locally recur and more frequent involvement of the distal extremities. The precise criteria separating cellular forms of ALT from what some consider "low grade" forms of DL remains controversial and inconsistently applied, even among individual pathologists within institutions. Given their underlying shared cytogenetic abnormality, molecular testing has no utility in this distinction. Herein is a comprehensive historical overview of ALT/WDL, with updates on its distinction from other similar lipomatous tumors and DL, including practical evidence-based criteria for the appropriate cost-effective use of MDM2 testing.

Novel computer aided diagnostic models on multimodality medical images to differentiate well differentiated liposarcomas from lipomas approached by deep learning methods

BACKGROUND

Deep learning methods have great potential to predict tumor characterization, such as histological diagnosis and genetic aberration. The objective of this study was to evaluate and validate the predictive performance of multimodality imaging-derived models using computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) methods for prediction of MDM2 gene amplification to identify well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and lipoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 127 patients from two institutions were included with 89 patients in one institution for model training and 38 patients in the other institution for external validation between January 2012 and December 2018. For each modality, handcrafted radiomics analysis with manual segmentation was applied to extract 851 features for each modality, and six pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) extracted 512-2048 deep learning features automatically. Extracted imaging-based features were selected via univariate filter selection methods and the recursive feature elimination algorithm, which were then classified by support vector machine for model construction. Integrated with two significant clinical variables, age and LDH level, a clinical-radiological model was constructed for identification WDLPS and lipoma. All differentiation models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and their 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The multimodality model on deep learning features extracted from ResNet50 algorithm (RN-DL model) performed great differentiation performance with an AUC of 0.995 (95% CI 0.987-1.000) for the training cohort, and an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI 0.886-1.000), accuracy of 92.11%, sensitivity of 95.00% (95% CI 73.06-99.74%), specificity of 88.89% (95% CI 63.93-98.05%) in external validation. The integrated clinical-radiological model represented an AUC of 0.996 (95% CI 0.989-1.000) for the training cohort, and an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI 0.867-1.000), accuracy of 86.84%, sensitivity of 95.00% (95% CI 73.06-99.74%), and specificity of 77.78% (95% CI 51.92-92.63%) in external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging-based multimodality models represent effective discrimination abilities between WDLPS and lipoma via CAD methods, and might be a practicable approach in assistance of treatment decision.

Inflammatory Variant of Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma of the Buccal Mucosa: An Overview and Case Report with a 10-Year Follow-Up

Liposarcomas of the oral cavity are rare. Those originating in the buccal mucosa cause challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issues since less than 40 cases of liposarcomas of the buccal mucosa and cheek have been reported in the worldwide literature. Herein, we present a case of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma affecting a 45-year-old female patient. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a well-defined mass located in the right buccal mucosa, extending to the submucosal layers of the cheek. Histopathologically, a well-differentiated fatty neoplasm with presence of prominent stromal inflammatory cells was observed. Multifocally scattered bizarre hyperchromatic stromal cells, some of which multinucleated, were also observed. An immunohistochemical panel comprising vimentin, S-100, CD10, CD34, CD20, CD3, CD68, CD138, MDM2, Ki-67, and P53 was employed to better characterize the lesion. A local recurrence event occurred during a 10-year follow-up period. Surgical resection was performed during both episodes. We also provided an overview of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, immunohistochemical features, imaging findings, and the differential diagnosis of liposarcoma of the oral cavity. Knowledge of the etiopathological and clinical aspects of this rare neoplasm is fundamental in order to rule out other conditions, including lipomatous lesions that affect the buccal mucosa.

Qualitative evaluation of MRI features of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor: results from a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study are (1) to distinguish lipoma (L) from atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) using MRI qualitative features, (2) to assess the value of contrast enhancement, and (3) to evaluate the reproducibility and confidence level of radiological readings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with pathologically proven L or ALT, who underwent MRI within 3 months from surgical excision were included in this retrospective multicenter international study. Two radiologists independently reviewed MRI centrally. Impressions were recorded as L or ALT. A third radiologist was consulted for discordant readings. The two radiologists re-read all non-contrast sequences; impression was recorded; then post-contrast images were reviewed and any changes were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients (135 females; median age, 59 years) were included. ALT was histopathologically confirmed in 70/246 patients. In multivariable analysis, in addition to the lesion size, deep location, proximal lower limb lesions, demonstrating incomplete fat suppression, or increased architectural complexity were the independent predictive features of ALT; but not the contrast enhancement. Post-contrast MRI changed the impression in a total of 5 studies (3 for R1 and 4 for R2; 2 studies are common); all of them were incorrectly changed from Ls to ALTs. Overall, inter-reader kappa agreement was 0.42 (95% CI 0.39-0.56). Discordance between the two readers was statistically significant for both pathologically proven L (p < 0.001) and ALT (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Most qualitative MR imaging features can help distinguish ALTs from BLs. However, contrast enhancement may be limited and occasionally misleading. Substantial discordance on MRI readings exists between radiologists with a relatively high false positive and negative rates.

Well-differentiated liposarcoma disguised as a recurrent lipoma of the forearm flexor compartment: A case report

•

The giant size and other unusual characteristics raised the awareness of malignant lipomatous mass.

•

Differential diagnosis between giant lipoma and liposarcoma is of great importance.

•

Post-operative histopathological diagnosis was well-differentiated liposarcoma lipoma-like.

Introduction

Lipomas are common benign mesenchymal tumor that arise from the adipose tissue. Differential diagnosis between the benign and malignant form (liposarcoma) must be made to prevent complication and recurrence.

Presentation of case

We reported a 63-year-old man who presented with recurrent large-sized mass on the right forearm with the first presentation approximately 28 years before being treated in our center. Main complaints were discomfort, social embracement, and difficulty in dressing. There were no compression symptoms observed. We performed marginal excision and sent the sample for histopathological examination. The work has been reported in line with the Surgical Case Report (SCARE) criteria.

Discussion

During one year of post-operative period, no recurrence was detected and a complete relief of symptoms was as expected.

Conclusion

Diagnostic challenge in such a large-sized (giant) lipoma is in differentiating it with the malignant form. Surgical excision is the choice of treatment. However, long-term follow up is needed due to the risk of recurrence.

Pedunculated, well differentiated liposarcoma of the oesophagus mimicking giant fibrovascular polyp

We present a rare case of a big oesophageal liposarcoma causing dysphagia and weight loss in a 75-year-old patient. Endoscopically, a pedunculated lesion with subtotal obstruction of the oesophageal lumen had been detected and thoracoabdominal oesophageal resection with gastric sleeve reconstruction was performed. Surprisingly, a liposarcoma of the oesophagus was revealed on histopathological analysis, showing MDM2 overexpression. Oncological follow-up has been uneventful and the patient remains in good clinical shape at 15 months after surgery.

Atypical Imaging Features of a Simple Intramuscular Lipoma

Lipoma is a benign tumour of mesenchymal tissue which closely resembles normal fat even histologically but for its biochemical and ultrastructural differences. Simple lipoma presents as a mass which resembles fat on all the imaging modalities. Atypical lipoma, lipoma variants and liposarcoma show specific imaging features. We report this case due to the varied imaging appearance of a simple lipoma. A 52-year-old lady presented with history of swelling along the anterior aspect of thigh. Sonography, CT and MRI had done which revealed an atypical lipoma; however excision biopsy proved to be a simple lipoma.

Huge dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the left thigh with a high grade fibrosarcomatous differentiation and a local recurrence

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma is one of the variants of liposarcoma which has a more aggressive course. It constitutes less than 10% of all the liposarcomas and is often found in the retroperitoneum and the mediastinum. We are reporting a rare case of a 60 years old female who presented with a huge, soft tissue mass in the left thigh with a past history of an operation which was done15 years back. The histopathological examination showed a well differentiated liposarcoma with a high grade fibrosarcomatous differentiation. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed the dedifferentiated liposarcoma with the high grade fibrosarcomatous differentiation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the 11th case in the literature with rare findings.