Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo-A Blinded Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Two Strategies in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease

OBJECTIVES

The routine use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the cardiac ICU (CICU) is controversial. We aimed to conduct a pilot study to explore the feasibility of performing a subsequent larger trial to assess the safety and efficacy of withholding SUP in this population (NCT03667703).

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS

Single-center, prospective, double-blinded, parallel group (SUP vs. placebo), pilot randomized controlled pilot trial (RCT) in infants with CHD admitted to the CICU and anticipated to require respiratory support for greater than 24 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1 (stratified by age and admission type) to receive a histamine-2 receptor antagonist or placebo until respiratory support was discontinued, up to 14 days, or transfer from the CICU, if earlier.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Feasibility was defined a priori by thresholds of screening rate, consent rate, timely drug allocation, and protocol adherence. The safety outcome was the rate of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. We screened 1,426 patients from February 2019 to March 2022; of 132 eligible patients, we gained informed consent in 70 (53%). Two patients did not require CICU admission after obtaining consent, and the remaining 68 patients were randomized to SUP (n = 34) or placebo (n = 34). Ten patients were withdrawn early, because of a change in eligibility (n = 3) or open-label SUP use (n = 7, 10%). Study procedures were completed in 58 patients (89% protocol adherence). All feasibility criteria were met. There were no clinically significant episodes of UGI bleeding during the pilot RCT. The percentage of patients with other nonserious adverse events did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Withholding of SUP in infants with CHD admitted to the CICU was feasible. A larger multicenter RCT designed to confirm the safety of this intervention and its impact on incidence of UGI bleeding, gastrointestinal microbiome, and other clinical outcomes is warranted.

Influence of Acid Blockade on the Aerodigestive Tract Microbiome in Children With Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Acid blockade is commonly prescribed in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Growing concerns, however, exist about its possible role in the pathophysiology of pulmonary infections. We aimed to investigate if acid blockade alters esophageal and respiratory microbiota leading to dysbiosis and inflammation.

METHODS

We performed a cross sectional study of children with CF who were either prescribed acid blockade or not. Samples from the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts were obtained and microbiome analyzed. Mixed effect models were used to compare outcomes between cohorts and across sampling sites. A random subject intercept was included to account for the multiple sampling sites per individual.

RESULTS

A cohort of 25 individuals, 44% girls with median age of 13.8 years [IQR 11.2--14.8] were enrolled. Alpha diversity, total bacterial load, and beta diversity were similar across anatomic compartments, across the upper gastrointestinal tract, and in respiratory samples. Similar alpha diversity, total bacterial load, and beta diversity results were also observed when comparing individuals on versus those off acid blockade. IL-8 was elevated in the distal versus proximal esophagus in the whole cohort (P < 0.01). IL-8 concentrations were similar in the distal esophagus in patients on and off acid blockade, but significantly greater in the proximal esophagus of subjects on treatment (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these data, acid blockade use does not appear to influence the microbiome of the aerodigestive tract in children with cystic fibrosis suggesting a complex interplay between these medications and the bacterial composition of the esophagus and lung.