[Pharmacolgic osteoporosis treatment of nursing home residents]

INTRODUCTION

Fragility fractures in older people are common and are often associated with nursing home admission in frail people. Only few institutionalized residents with documented osteoporosis receive pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment. Studies demonstrating the benefit of osteoporosis drug therapy in this multimorbid and vulnerable population are lacking.

A Narrative Review of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: What a Clinician Should Know

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an uncommon complication of antiresorptive therapy (ART) in patients receiving higher and more frequent doses of osteoclast inhibitors. The jaws are the most common site, as they have high bone turnover. The oral structures are exposed to various types of stresses, like mastication and dental diseases, which lead to microtrauma and increased bone remodeling. The hallmark feature of MRONJ is the area of exposed, necrotic, nonhealing, asymptomatic bone for more than eight weeks. Objective signs are pain in the jaw and oral cavity, loose teeth, gingival swelling, ulceration, soft tissue infection, and paresthesia in the trigeminal nerve branches' territory. Clinically, the MRONJ has been defined in four stages, from stage 0 to stage 3. Close coordination between the dentist and oncologist is critical for optimal treatment. Conservative management should be preferred over surgical management. There is significant underreporting and misdiagnosis of MRONJ cases in regular clinical practice. There needs to be more awareness among treating physicians about this sporadic complication of bisphosphonate therapy. This narrative review has given a detailed insight into the subject, starting with etiology, pathogenesis, incidence, clinical presentation, workup, staging, and various management strategies. The review article focuses mainly on practical aspects of MRONJ, which every clinician dealing with the disease must know. With a better awareness of this potential complication, healthcare practitioners dealing with at-risk patients can better diagnose, prevent, address, and provide necessary care.

Initiation of Antiresorptive Drug Treatment during Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer-A Retrospective Cohort Study of 161,492 Patients in Germany

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to measure the proportion of women with an initial prescription of an antiresorptive drug (bisphosphonates or denosumab) during five years of endocrine breast cancer therapy.

METHODS

The study included women with an initial prescription of tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) between January 2016 and December 2020. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to show the cumulative incidence of antiresorptive drug prescription for TAM and AIs separately for four age groups. A univariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was also used to estimate the relationship between initial endocrine drug (AIs vs. TAM) and antiresorptive drug prescription.

RESULTS

Within 5 years, 14.1% of patients on AI and 6.1% on TAM received their first prescription for an antiresorptive drug (p < 0.001). The difference between AI and TAM was greatest in women ≤50 years (12.9% of AI and 2.8% of patients on TAM), and smallest in women >80 years (14.5% of AI and 10.3% of patients on TAM). The proportion of denosumab was 46.2% among AI patients vs. 29.1% among patients on TAM (p < 0.001) as alendronate was prescribed to 36.9% of AI vs. 50.0% of patients on TAM.

CONCLUSIONS

Across all age groups, the cumulative incidence of antiresorptive drug prescriptions was higher in patients with BC treated with AI than those receiving TAM. Denosumab was most frequently used as an antiresorptive drug in patients treated with AI, while alendronate was administered more often in patients treated with TAM.

Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND

Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is the most common metabolic complication of malignancies, but its incidence may be declining due to potent chemotherapeutic agents. The high mortality associated with HCM has declined markedly due to the introduction of increasingly effective chemotherapeutic drugs. Despite the widespread availability of efficacious medications to treat HCM, evidence-based recommendations to manage this debilitating condition are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To develop guidelines for the treatment of adults with HCM.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts, together with experts in systematic literature review, identified and prioritized 8 clinical questions related to the treatment of HCM in adult patients. The systematic reviews (SRs) queried electronic databases for studies relevant to the selected questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. An independent SR was conducted in parallel to assess patients' and physicians' values and preferences, costs, resources needed, acceptability, feasibility, equity, and other domains relevant to the Evidence-to-Decision framework as well as to enable judgements and recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel recommends (strong recommendation) in adults with HCM treatment with denosumab (Dmab) or an intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). The following recommendations were based on low certainty of the evidence. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) (1) in adults with HCM, the use of Dmab rather than an IV BP; (2) in adults with severe HCM, a combination of calcitonin and an IV BP or Dmab therapy as initial treatment; and (3) in adults with refractory/recurrent HCM despite treatment with BP, the use of Dmab. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) the addition of an IV BP or Dmab in adult patients with hypercalcemia due to tumors associated with high calcitriol levels who are already receiving glucocorticoid therapy but continue to have severe or symptomatic HCM. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) in adult patients with hypercalcemia due to parathyroid carcinoma, treatment with either a calcimimetic or an antiresorptive (IV BP or Dmab). The panel judges the treatments as probably accessible and feasible for most recommendations but noted variability in costs, resources required, and their impact on equity.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel's recommendations are based on currently available evidence considering the most important outcomes in HCM to patients and key stakeholders. Treatment of the primary malignancy is instrumental for controlling hypercalcemia and preventing its recurrence. The recommendations provide a framework for the medical management of adults with HCM and incorporate important decisional and contextual factors. The guidelines underscore current knowledge gaps that can be used to establish future research agendas.

A Retrospective Data Analysis for the Risk Evaluation of the Development of Drug-Associated Jaw Necrosis through Dentoalveolar Interventions

This study aimed to analyse the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients who underwent surgical intervention to identify potential risk factors between three different groups sorted by the type of oral surgery (single tooth extraction, multiple extraction, osteotomy). Data from patients with this medical history between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed. The following parameters were collected: sex, age, medical status, surgical intervention location of dentoalveolar intervention and form of medication. A total of 115 patients fulfilled the criteria and underwent 115 dental surgical interventions (female n = 90, male n = 25). In total, 73 (63.47%) of them had metastatic underlying diseases, and 42 (36.52%) had osteoporotic ones. MRONJ occurred in 10 patients (8.70%) (female n = 5, male n = 5). The occurrence of MRONJ was significantly correlated (p ≤ 0.05) with the mandible site and male sex. Tooth removal at the mandible site remains the main risk factor for the development of MRONJ. The risk profile of developing MRONJ after dentoalveolar interventions could be expected as follows: tooth osteotomy > multiple extractions > single tooth extraction.

Differential effects of anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody and zoledronic acid on necrotic bone in a murine model of Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis

Osteomyelitis is characterized by progressive inflammatory bone destruction accompanied by severe pain and disability. However, with the exception of antibiotic therapies, there is no established therapy to protect the bone from infectious osteolysis. The anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) monoclonal antibody (anti-RANKL Ab) is a potential drug based on its proven effectiveness in preventing joint bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis; however, the efficacy and adverse effects of anti-RANKL Ab in osteomyelitis remain to be investigated. In this study, we investigated the effects of anti-mouse RANKL Ab on acute osteomyelitis and compared them with those of zoledronic acid (ZA) using a murine model. Mice were inoculated with bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus (Xen 29) on their left femur and then treated with ZA, anti-RANKL Ab, or phosphate-buffered saline as control. A 21-day longitudinal observational study using microcomputed tomography showed that both anti-RANKL Ab and ZA had an osteoprotective effect against infectious osteolysis. However, it was also demonstrated through bioluminescence imaging that ZA delayed the spontaneous reduction of bacterial load and through histology that it increased the amount of necrotic bone, while anti-RANKL Ab did not. Findings from histopathological and in vitro studies suggest that an intense inflammatory response around the necrotic bone could induce osteoclasts in a RANKL-independent manner, leading to the removal of necrotic bone, even after administration of the anti-RANKL Ab therapy. Collectively, anti-RANKL Ab may exert an osteoprotective effect without hampering the removal of the necrotic bone, which serves as a nidus for infection in osteomyelitis.

18F-Fluoride PET/CT Imaging of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Conservative Treatment-A Case Report

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious side effect in antiresorptive treatment. Treatment of MRONJ is considered primarily conservative with oral mouth rinses and antibiotics but may demand surgery, depending on the complaints and general condition of the patient, the extent of the necrosis, and the overall prognosis with respect to the underlying disease. A 77 year old female patient with invasive ductal breast cancer and bone metastases was treated with intravenous bisphosphonate (BP) zoledronic acid. During therapy, she developed MRONJ in the mandible with severe pain. Clinical examination revealed confluent exposed bone of the lower left jaw and a fistula at the right molar region. The panoramic radiograph revealed a mandibular osseous involvement with diffuse radiopaque areas between radiolucent areas. For preoperative planning, ¹⁸F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) of the jaw was performed, showing substantially increased ¹⁸F-fluoride uptake in regions 38 to 47 of the mandible with a focal gap in region 36 (area of clinically exposed bone). CT revealed medullary sclerosis and cortical thickening with confluent periosteal reaction and focal cortical erosion in the regions 37 to 42, whereas the regions 43 to 47 were only subtly sclerotic without cortical thickening. After systemic antibiotic therapy with sultamicillin following significant symptom and pain relief, ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT imaging was performed again after 5 months. No changes in either CT and PET were observed in regions 38 to 42, whereas the bony sclerosis was slightly increased in regions 43 to 47 with a slight reduction of ¹⁸F-fluoride uptake. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT showed no significant changes assessing the extent of MRONJ prior and after systemic antibiotic therapy, providing no evidence that conservative treatment reduced the extent of the MRONJ-affected jawbone. The additional information of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET enables to identify the true extent of MRONJ which may be underestimated by CT imaging alone. Patients with MRONJ undergoing conservative treatment could benefit because additional imaging may be avoided as the pre-therapeutic ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT delivers all information needed for further treatment. Our findings support the recommendation of a surgical approach as long-term antibiotics cannot downsize the extent of MRONJ.

Dental pathologies in tumor patients with bone metastases or multiple myeloma scheduled for antiresorptive therapy

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a potentially severe complication of mainly antiresorptive drugs. We evaluated the frequency of dentoalveolar pathologies in patients scheduled for antiresorptive therapy in a 'real-world' setting, also including patients with poor oral health potentially requiring tooth extractions and/or other dentoalveolar surgery. This approach is in contrast to the setting of recent randomized trials with restrictive exclusion criteria. Patients & methods: We prospectively included patients suffering from solid tumors with osseous metastases or multiple myeloma. Screening for dentoalveolar pathologies was done prior to initiation of antiresorptive therapy at the specialized MRONJ clinic of the University Hospital for Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Innsbruck, Austria. Results: 119 subjects could be included. In 76 patients (63.9%), a dental focus was revealed including deep caries (24.4% of patients), chronic apical periodontitis (26.9%), periodontal disease (45.8%), root remnants (16%), jaw cysts (2.5%), partially impacted teeth (5.0%) and peri-implantitis (5.0%). Conclusion: Considering the high number of dentoalveolar pathologies (63.9%), systematic dental focus screening prior to initiation of antiresorptive therapy is of utmost importance to lower the risk for MRONJ.

[Comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with osteoporosis after hip arthroplasty]

Most people who have undergone hip arthroplasty belong to the older age groups, so they often have signs of osteoporosis. A decrease in bone mineral density in combination with a decrease in local blood circulation caused by additional trauma to bone structures and surrounding soft tissues during surgery contributes to osteolysis, early instability of the endoprosthesis and increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effectiveness of the developed rehabilitation complex, including the combined effect of a physiotherapeutic factor (increased gravity) and antiresorptive therapy, in patients with osteoporosis who underwent hip arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 40 patients aged 60-75 years with signs of osteoporosis, who underwent total hip arthroplasty, no more than 3 weeks ago. The patients were randomized into two groups: the main group - 16 (40%) people, comparisons - 24 (60%) people. To assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation complexes, orthopedic examination, functional diagnostics of motor pathology of the lower extremities on an automatic hardware-software complex, X-ray densitometry, and indicators of the visual analogue pain scale and Harris scale were evaluated. Patients of both groups were prescribed a rehabilitation complex, including therapeutic exercises, mechanotherapy for training the thigh muscles and electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles, a course of 10 procedures. Patients of the main group were additionally prescribed a course of gravitational and antiresorptive therapy according to our methodology.

RESULTS

The intensity of pain before treatment in patients of both groups corresponded to moderate pain syndrome. After 3 months after the course of rehabilitation, the pain intensity in the patients of the main group decreased statistically significantly by 3.1 times, in the patients of the comparison group - by 2.6 times. When assessing the biomechanical data of walking at the beginning of the rehabilitation course, the asymmetry of pressure indices was revealed in patients of both groups, corresponding to the average degree of lameness. After 3 months, the asymmetry coefficient in the patients of the comparison group reached a mild degree, while in the patients of the main group it approached the norm. According to X-ray densitometry, after 12 months, the bone mineral density index only in patients of the main group increased to the level of osteopenia. The indicator of the combined assessments of the Harris scale was statistically significantly different between the groups at 3 and 6 months after the course of rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of gravitational therapy and antiresorptive drugs in the treatment and rehabilitation complex in patients with osteoporosis who have undergone total hip arthroplasty helps to reduce pain, reduce signs of osteoporosis, improve the functional parameters of patients' activity, and increase household and social adaptation.

Osteoporosis in Premenopausal Women: A Clinical Narrative Review by the ECTS and the IOF

CONTEXT

Consensus regarding diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in premenopausal women (PW) is still lacking due to few studies carried out in this population.

DESIGN

The European Calcified Tissue Society and the International Osteoporosis Foundation convened a working group to produce an updated review of literature published after 2017 on this topic.

RESULTS

Fragility fractures in PW are rare and mostly due to secondary osteoporosis (ie, in presence of an underlying disease such as hormonal, inflammatory, or digestive disorders). In absence of another disorder, low bone mineral density (BMD) together with fragility fractures qualifies as idiopathic osteoporosis. In contrast, low BMD alone does not necessarily represent osteoporosis in absence of bone microarchitectural abnormalities. BMD increases in PW with osteoporosis when the underlying disease is treated. For example, in celiac disease, an increase of 9% in radius trabecular volumetric density was achieved after 1 year of gluten-free diet, while anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha improved BMD in PW with inflammatory bowel diseases. In amenorrhea, including anorexia nervosa, appropriately delivered estrogen replacement therapy can also improve BMD. Alternatively, antiresorptive or anabolic therapy has been shown to improve BMD in a variety of conditions, the range of improvement (3%-16%) depending on skeletal site and the nature of the secondary cause. No studies were powered to demonstrate fracture reduction. The effects of bisphosphonates in childbearing women have been scantly studied and caution is needed.

CONCLUSION

The majority of PW with osteoporosis have an underlying disease. Specific therapy of these diseases, as well as antiresorptive and anabolic drugs, improve BMD, but without evidence of fracture reduction.

[Current evidence-based approaches and international guidelines in primary and secondary prevention strategies of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws]

Introduction: The presumably multifactorial pathomechanisms of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws have not been fully elucidated so far. Management of this rare but serious side effect is a real challenge and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Aim: The aim of the authors was to take stock of our present knowledge about the pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical manifestations and the possibilities of prevention and treatment in the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. In addition, the available international guidelines are compared and the evidence-based, stage-specific conservative and adjuvant therapeutic approaches are also reviewed, having regard to special aspects of medical and dental care. Method: In the last 5 years - due to the increasing number of disorder-oriented database - the number of available systematic reviews, recommendations and meta-analyses has escalated significantly which we reviewed and compared. Results: Since the last Position Paper published by the taskforce of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, novel pharmacological groups with the potential to induce osteonecrosis have come in the clinical scope, further elaborating the nomenclature of the disease and further specifying patient groups. The sphere of patients at risk has broadened and novel patient groups (rheumatologic-osteological, immunosuppressed, transplanted or oncological patients treated with monoclonal antibody, known as 'target therapy') are expected to develop this serious side effect. Conclusion: Although a number of issues are still open regarding the treatment of the disorder, evidence-based, individualized, stage-adapted therapeutic approaches have replaced the previous empirical treatment. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(6): 214-223.

The efficacy of pharmacotherapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a longitudinal observational study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was an assessment of longitudinal changes in fracture probability in postmenopausal women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A group of 226 postmenopausal women at baseline mean age 66.46 ± 7.96 years were studied. There were 21 women without therapy, 102 taking calcium + vitamin D, and 103 women on antiresorptive therapy, in the study group. Data concerning clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and hip BMD were gathered. Fracture probability for major and hip fractures was established using FRAXTM.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 2.43 ± 0.59 years. Baseline FRAX value in the whole group for major fracture was 7.1 ± 4.18, and at follow-up it was 7.44 ± 4.04. Respective results for FRAX for hip fracture were 3.17 ± 2.69 and 3.02 ± 2.35. In the whole group the probability for major fractures significantly increased during follow-up (p < 0.05) and for hip fracture did not change. In non-treated patients and patients taking calcium + vitamin D the fracture probability increased significantly. In patients on antiresorptive therapy the fracture probability did not change, which was connected with an improvement in bone status assessed by DXA. Femoral neck T-score in the whole group did not change, in those not treated and taking calcium + vitamin D it decreased significantly (p < 0.05), while in treated women it increased significantly (p < 0.05). In patients with improved bone status the FRAX values for major and hip fractures decreased by 0.44 ± 1.62 and 0.36 ± 1.19, respectively. Conversely, in patients with worsening T-score value the FRAX values increased by 1.33 ± 1.42 and 0.66 ± 1.25, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Antiresorptive therapy stabilises fracture probability in postmenopausal women due to improvement in bone status.

Biological effects of aromatic bis[aminomethylidenebis(phosphonic)] acids in osteoclast precursors in vitro

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) inhibit bone resorption by preventing osteoclast activity. Most clinically used BPs are hydroxybisphosphonates with the exception of incadronate, which belongs to the class of aminomethylidenebisphosphonic acids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antiproliferative activity of two previously reported aminobisphosphonates (WG8185B2 and WG9001B) in combination with doxorubicin and cisplatin toward J774E cells (a model of osteoclast precursors in vitro). WG8185B2 and WG9001B BPs enhanced the cytotoxic activity of doxorubicin and cisplatin, especially when applied 24 hr prior to cytostatics. The antiproliferative effect of studied BPs was related to the changes in cell cycle progression. WG8185B2 leads to significant accumulation of J774E cells in S phase, whereas WG9001B causes transient arrest in G₂ /M phase, followed by an increase in the percentage of cells in S phase. Moreover, WG8185B2 and WG9001B BPs showed enhanced proapoptotic activity in osteoclast precursors, which was manifested by an increase in caspase-3 activity and percentage of apoptotic cells. In addition, both compounds influenced the motility of J774E cells. The exact molecular mechanism of action of examined BPs remains to be determined; however, results show an interesting biological activity of these compounds, which may be of interest in the context of antiresorptive therapy.

[Risk assessment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in general dental practice]

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw may appear as adverse effect in antiresorptive therapy. Its successful treatment is challenging. We aimed to gather the systemic and local factors playing a role in etiology, published after its recognition. Risk factors were collected from the PubMed database 1998-2018. The three main groups of risk patients are: patients starting, patients having antiresorptive therapy, osteonecrosis diagnosed patients. The dentist must recognize risk factors, determine appropriate treatment plan and frequency of check-ups. Oncological disease treated intravenously means the greatest risk. Further systemic risk factors are: supportive therapies, concomitant disease, way of life, individual factors. Local risk factors may be: dentoalveolar surgery, periapical and periodontal inflammation, ill-fitting denture, presence of some anatomical structures. The accumulation of risk factors determines the probability of the manifestation of osteonecrosis. The most favorable case is patient starting antiresorptive therapy with a dental status needing no treatment. Orv hetil. 2019; 160(7): 243-251.

Management of mineral and bone disorders in renal transplant recipients

The management of post-transplantation bone disease is a complex problem that remains under-appreciated in clinical practice. In these patients, pre-existing metabolic bone disorder is further impacted by the use of immunosuppressive medications (glucocorticoids and calcineurin-inhibitors), variable post-transplantation renal allograft function and post-transplantation diabetes mellitus. The treatment of post-transplantation bone loss should begin pre-transplantation. All patients active on transplant waiting lists should be screened for bone disease. Patients should also be encouraged to take preventative measures against osteoporosis such as regular weight-bearing exercise, smoking cessation and reducing alcohol consumption. Biochemical abnormalities of disordered mineral metabolism should be corrected prior to transplantation wherever possible, and because these abnormalities commonly persist, post transplant hypophosphatemia, persistent hyperparathyroidism and low vitamin D levels should be regularly monitored and treated. Bone loss is greatest in the first 6-12 months post-transplantation, during which period any intervention is likely to be of greatest benefit. There is strong evidence that bisphosphonates prevent post-transplantation bone loss; however, data are lacking that this clearly extends to a reduction in fracture incidence. Denosumab is a potential alternative to vitamin D receptor agonists and bisphosphonates in reducing post-transplantation bone loss; however, further studies are needed to demonstrate its safety in patients with a significantly reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate. Clinical judgement remains the cornerstone of this complex clinical problem, providing a strong rationale for the formation of combined endocrinology and nephrology clinics to treat patients with Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder, before and after transplantation.

Antiresorptive therapy and newly diagnosed diabetes in women: a historical cohort study

AIMS

Undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) promotes increased insulin sensitivity and increased secretion. Since antiresorptive therapy (AT) decreases ucOC levels, AT could increase the risk of diabetes and this would have serious clinical ramifications. We sought to test this hypothesis by examining the association between new use of AT and newly-diagnosed diabetes.

METHODS

Using a bone mineral density (BMD) registry for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 33 640 women aged ≥50 years without diabetes at their first BMD test for 1998-2013. We linked these women to a province-wide retail pharmacy database to identify new AT exposure each year for up to 5 years after a BMD test. Time-dependent analysis was used to test the independent association between new use of AT and newly diagnosed diabetes.

RESULTS

This cohort had a mean age of 65 years, a mean body mass index of 26.8 kg/m(2) , and 12% were receiving glucocorticoid and 13% hormone replacement therapy at BMD test. In the first year after BMD test, 29% of women started AT (bisphosphonates, 92%). Over a mean 4.2 years of follow-up, 3.7% new AT users and 4.2% non-users had diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.16). Sensitivity analyses using AT dose-response gradients also found no significant associations with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the plausible biological mechanisms related to ucOC, new use of AT was not a risk factor for diabetes in this cohort. The clinical implications of these findings are reassuring, as AT is widely prescribed for treating osteoporosis in older women who are also at high risk of developing diabetes.

Commentary: Concurrent administration of PTH and antiresorptives: Additive effects or DXA cosmetics

Osteoanabolic therapy with parathyroid hormone (PTH(1-84)) or the PTH analogues teriparatide (PTH(1-34), TPTD) and abaloparatide induces a positive remodeling balance and increases modeling and remodeling activity on bone surfaces. As the anabolic action of PTH is primarily remodeling based increased bone turnover maximizes bone accrual. Increased remodeling, however, also increases cortical porosity and reduces mineralization of newly formed bone, which may cause initial reductions in BMD, particularly at sites rich in cortical bone. Increased cortical porosity may also have negative consequences for bone strength. Consequently, an interest developed in concurrent therapies offsetting the potential early negative cortical bone effects developed, and several studies using varying concurrent combinations of TPTD or PTH(1-84) with various antiresorptive (anti-catabolic) agents (estrogen, SERMs, bisphosphonates and denosumab) have been published. This commentary addresses the discrepancy between changes in areal bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) in concurrent therapy studies leading to possible misinterpretations of the results. In studies of concurrent therapies increases in BMD are generally accompanied by decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover. This includes Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propetide (PINP), which has emerged as a reliable marker of bone formation during osteoanabolic therapy. We therefore want to submit, that the larger increases in BMD seen initially in patients on concurrent therapy mask the potential for later reduced osteoanabolic action of PTH. This notion is corroborated by: 1) the lesser impairment of bone anabolism seen with milder antiresorptive modalities like hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs); 2) the changes in BMD seen in extension studies where treatment naïve patients previously treated with PTH alone are crossed over to antiresorptive drugs. We therefore advise against a general use of concurrent therapy with PTH and antiresorptive agents, as it entails blunting of osteoanabolic action of PTH in the long run.

Effects of denosumab on bone density, mass and strength in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody which specifically blocks receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and is a very potent antiresorptive drug. Its efficacy in reducing the risk of vertebral, hip and nonskeletal fracture has been proven in a large prospective, randomized multicenter study of 7808 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM) trial]. Denosumab causes somewhat greater increases in bone mineral density (BMD) than the class of bisphosphonate antiresorptives. Denosumab also causes an increase in bone mass and bone strength in the spine, ultradistal and diaphysis of the radius, proximal tibia and the hip. Recently long-term treatment with denosumab has been shown to cause a continued almost linear increase in total hip and femoral neck BMD beyond 3 years up to 8 years. In this respect, denosumab seems to differ from the bisphosphonate group in which the rate of improvement of BMD diminishes and for some drugs becomes negative after 3-4 years when the process of secondary mineralization flattens out. This unique property of an antiresorptive drug points towards mechanisms of action which differ from the bisphosphonate group. Both types of antiresorptives decrease cortical porosity but contrary to bisphosphonates the reduction in cortical porosity continues with denosumab which, in addition, also seems to cause a slight continuous modeling-based formation of new bone despite suppression of bone remodeling. The net effect is an increase in cortical thickening and bone mass, and increased strength of cortical bone. This may contribute substantially to the significant further reduction of the nonvertebral fracture risk which was found in the long-term denosumab arm of the FREEDOM extension trial during years 4-7.

Current approaches to bone-targeted therapy in genitourinary malignancies

Bone metastases in patients with genitourinary cancers are associated with increased risk for skeletal-related events including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and the requirement for surgery or palliative radiotherapy to bone. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and the monoclonal antibody against RANK, denosumab, are approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events in genitourinary cancers. These agents have different mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, and while both are effective in reducing the risk of skeletal-related events, other clinical effects differ. There is evidence for direct and indirect anticancer activity with zoledronic acid from preclinical studies and emerging data from clinical studies suggesting an effect on patient survival. Potential anticancer mechanisms include inhibition of angiogenesis, enhanced immune surveillance via stimulation of γδ T cells, and reduction of circulating tumor cells. A synergistic effect of chemotherapy plus zoledronic acid has also been suggested. Further research is ongoing regarding the roles of these antiresorptive therapies in patients with bone metastases or at high risk for malignant spread to skeletal sites.

Importance of antiresorptive therapies for patients with bone metastases from solid tumors

Patients with bone metastases are at risk of skeletal-related events such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, the need for orthopedic surgery to bone, and palliative radiotherapy for severe bone pain. Antiresorptive therapies have demonstrated efficacy for reducing the risk of skeletal-related events and ameliorating bone pain. Despite the well documented clinical benefits of antiresorptive therapies, patient benefits can be limited or compromised by nonadherence with scheduled therapy. Potential reasons for poor compliance include lack of understanding of how antiresorptive therapies work, neglecting the importance of bone health in maintaining quality of life, and being unaware of the potentially debilitating effects of skeletal-related events caused by bone metastases. Indeed, patients may stop therapy after bone pain subsides or discontinue due to generally mild and usually manageable adverse events, leaving them at an increased risk of developing skeletal-related events. In addition, the cost of antiresorptive therapy can be a concern for many patients with cancer. Medical care for patients with cancer requires a coordinated effort between primary care physicians and oncologists. Patients’ medical care teams can be leveraged to help educate them about the importance of adherence to antiresorptive therapy when cancer has metastasized to bone. Because primary care physicians generally have more contact with their patients than oncologists, they are in a unique position to understand patient perceptions and habits that may lead to noncompliance and to help educate patients about the benefits and risks of various antiresorptive therapies in the advanced cancer setting. Therefore, primary care physicians need to be aware of various mechanistic and clinical considerations regarding antiresorptive treatment options.

Cancer treatment-related bone loss: a review and synthesis of the literature

Cancer therapy can result in significant bone loss and increased risk of fragility fracture. Chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitors, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues contribute to increases in the rate of bone remodelling and reduce bone mineral density. Patients with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy experience an increase in the risk of fracture. New research has demonstrated the key role played by bisphosphonates in preventing declines in bone density and increases in bone remodelling. Novel antiresorptive agents targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand have great potential in skeletal protection and prevention of bone loss related to cancer therapy. Early assessment of skeletal health, followed by initiation of calcium, vitamin D, and an exercise program are valuable in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In addition, individuals at increased risk for fracture should be offered antiresorptive therapy. Early data have demonstrated that bisphosphonates are able to prevent the bone loss and increased bone remodelling associated with cancer therapy, including aromatase inhibition and androgen deprivation therapy. The present paper reviews the new research and advances in the management of bone loss associated with both cancer therapy and estrogen deficiency in the postmenopausal female.