Poisoning by Organophosphate Pesticides: A Case Report

In many parts of the world, particularly in impoverished nations like Ethiopia, organophosphate compounds operate as suicide agents, are frequently employed as pesticides, and are strong inhibitors of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme. A 21-year-old Ethiopian female, a university student, was admitted to an emergency department on June 22, 2022, with a two-hour history of nausea and elevated secretions of salivation via the mouth. She had no previous history of psychiatric or neurological disorders, but three days before her admission, she quarreled with her boyfriend, became extremely depressed, and decided to commit suicide. She had a two-hour history of nausea and intermittent vomiting and a one-hour history of persistent vomiting, increased salivation secretions through the mouth, chills, progressive sweating, difficulty breathing, and dizziness. Upon admission, her neurological examination in the emergency department revealed a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9/15. On admission, she was placed on two liters per minute of intranasal oxygen via the nasal cannula. On the same day, she was given atropine 0.15 mg intravenously, and the dose was doubled every 10 minutes until atropinization was achieved, and a bolus dose of 500ml of 0.9% of normal saline was initiated immediately.

Validation of a preclinical dry eye model in New Zealand white rabbits during and following topical instillation of 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to validate an animal model for dry eye during and after the administration of 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate (OAS) in New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits.

METHODS

OAS (1%) was applied three times per day to 30 eyes of 15 healthy NZW rabbits. Sacrifice, enucleation, and lacrimal gland removal took place on days 15, 21, and 30 (OAS group). A second group (n = 5) was used as control. Clinical evaluations took place on days 3, 10, 15, 18, 21, 24 and 30. The primary endpoints were: Schirmer I test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining. As secondary endpoints, clinical changes including intraocular pressure, and histopathology were evaluated.

RESULTS

While OAS was administered, the Schirmer I test showed a statistically significant reduction for OAS group versus control (p < 0.001), and versus basal production (p < 0.001). TBUT showed statistically significant differences between groups (days 3 and 10; p = 0.001) and versus basal values (day 3; p < 0.001). Fluorescein staining showed a statistically significant difference (day 3; p = 0.001). The most frequent clinical finding was conjunctival hyperemia (76.9% OAS vs. 20% control). For histopathology, all OAS subjects presented some degree of inflammation (86.7% minimal; 13.3% mild) whereas the control presented only 30% minimal inflammation. Goblet cell density showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the OAS dry eye model in NZW rabbits as reported in previous studies was confirmed, provided that the application of the drug is maintained throughout the intervention; it is not a viable model after OAS administration is suspended.

Sublingual Atropine Sulfate Use for Sialorrhea in Pediatric Patients

Sialorrhea is a frequent problem and may lead to aspiration in patients with swallowing dysfunction. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of sublingual atropine sulfate treatment in pediatric patients with sialorrhea. The medical records of patients who had received sublingual atropine sulfate between January 2015 and January 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The demographic properties, diagnosis, invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation need, and the presence of tracheotomy were assessed. Response rates to sublingual atropine were measured using the Teacher Drooling Scale (TDS). Pre and post-treatment drooling scores were compared. Atropine sulfate ampoule was administered at 20 µg/kg/dose. Minimum dose was 0.25 mg, while maximum dose was 0.03 mg/kg.Thirty-five pediatric patients with sialorrhea who had received sublingual atropine sulfate were identified; however, TDS scores had been recorded in only 20 of them. The median age of the patients was 25 months (3-78 months; 7 girls, 13 boys). Sixteen (80%) patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation and seven (30%) had tracheotomy. Nineteen patients had a neurodevelopmental disorder and only one patient had oral and esophageal lesions due to corrosive material intake. The median TDS score prior to sublingual atropine sulfate treatment was 5, and it decreased to 3 on the second day of treatment, a change that was statistically significant ( p  < 0.001). No side effects were observed. Sublingual atropine sulfate is safe and effective in the short-term treatment of sialorrhea; however, randomized placebo controlled and long-term follow-up studies are necessary.

The Additive Effect of Atropine Sulfate during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-hospital Non-traumatic Cardiac Arrest Patients with Non-shockable Rhythm

Objective The updated guidelines of 2015 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) do not recommend the routine use of atropine for cardiopulmonary arrest. Methods The study population included out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with non-shockable rhythm who were encountered at a Japanese community hospital between October 1, 2012 and April 30, 2017. Results At the outcome, the epinephrine with atropine and epinephrine-only groups had a similar survival rate to that at hospital admission (28.7% vs. 26.7%: p=0.723). The odds ratio (OR) for the survival to hospital admission after the administration of atropine with epinephrine was 1.33 (95% CI 1.09-1.62; p<0.01), while that after the administration of epinephrine was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.74, p<0.01). The ORs for the survival to hospital admission for patients with pulseless electrical activity in the epinephrine-alone group and the atropine with epinephrine group were 0.62 (95% CI 0.49-0.78; p<0.01) and 1.35 (95% CI 0.99-1.83; p=0.06), respectively, and those for such patients with asystole in the epinephrine-alone group and the atropine with epinephrine group were 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.76; p<0.01) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.10-1.77; p<0.01), respectively. The OR for the survival to hospital admission after the administration of atropine sulfate (1 mg) was 2.91 (95% CI 1.49-5.67; p<0.01), while that for the survival to hospital admission after the administration of 0, 2 and ≥3 mg atropine sulfate was 0.38 (95% CI 0.29-0.50; p<0.01), 1.54 (95% CI 0.58-4.08; p=0.38) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.09-0.60; p<0.01), respectively. Conclusion The addition of atropine (within 2 mg) following epinephrine was a comprehensive independent predictor of the survival to hospital admission for non-shockable (especially asystole) OHCA adults.

Predictive factors of negative outcome in initial atropine therapy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

BACKGROUND

The predictive factors of negative outcome in initial i.v. atropine (IA) therapy of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) are unknown. Conservative therapy for IHPS is useful for infants because it does not have the risk of surgical and anesthetic stress, but some cases of atropine therapy result in failure. This study clarified the predictive markers of negative outcome in initial atropine therapy for IHPS.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with IHPS admitted from 1998 to 2011 were included in this study. The predictive risk factors of negative outcome in initial atropine therapy for IHPS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients initially underwent non-operative therapy for IHPS during the study period. Of the 31 patients, 18 (58%) ceased projectile vomiting (PV) with IA and subsequent oral atropine. Univariate analysis showed that lack of bodyweight gain before treatment, elevated urine potassium at admission, and PV occurring ≥5 times (PV ≥5) in total for 3 days from IA initiation were predictive risk factors for negative outcome in IHPS. Multivariate analysis identified only PV ≥5 in total for 3 days after IA initiation as independently associated with failure of atropine for IHPS.

CONCLUSIONS

PV ≥5 in total for 3 days after IA initiation is a potential indicator of negative outcome of IA in IHPS patients. The present results provide valuable information for determining whether early surgical intervention for IHPS or initial atropine therapy is the best option.