Comparative effectiveness of calfactant and beractant in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A systemic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Animal derived surfactants are considered to be the standard treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). However, their comparative effectiveness remains inconclusive given the multiple prior studies with inconsistent results. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta analysis to compare the effectiveness of two animal extract surfactants (calfactant and beractant) for the management of NRDS.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies comparing efficacy of calfactant and beractant for the treatment of NRDS. Mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Review Manager.

RESULT

We found no significant difference between calfactnat and beractant groups in the primary outcomes: neonatal mortality before the age of 28 days (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.97-1.46, p = 0.09), mortality before the hospital release (RR = 1.12, 95% Cl = 0.94-1.33, p = 0.22), oxygen requirement at 28 days of age (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p = 0.52), and death or oxygen need at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.91-1.08, p = 0.81). The duration of supplementary oxygen was significantly lower in calfactant users (MD = -4.95, 95% CI = -7.60--2.30, p = 0.0002). Calfactant significantly lowered the duration of hospital stay, risk of pneumothorax and air leak syndrome whereas beractant users had lower risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (Grades 3 and 4).

CONCLUSION

There is no substantial difference in the efficacy of both surfactants in the prophylaxis and treatment of NRDS.

Effect of two different early rescue surfactant treatments on mortality in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Although current evidence suggests that initial dose of 200 mg/kg poractant alfa reduces mortality in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), these data were obtained in a highly heterogeneous group of patients and neither of them addressed mortality as primary outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of poractant alfa and beractant on mortality when administered as early rescue surfactant therapy in very preterm infants.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated preterm infants followed in our unit between May 2017 and November 2018 whose gestational age (GA) was ≤28 weeks and received surfactant within the first 2 hours of life. Morbidities and mortality rates were compared between infants who received initial doses of 200 mg/kg poractant alfa and 100 mg/kg beractant.

RESULTS

Data from 200 infants who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. There were 112 patients in the poractant alfa group and 88 patients in beractant group. Mean gestational age in these groups was 26 ± 2 and 25.8 ± 1.8 weeks (P = 0.45) and mean birth weight was 812 ± 243 and 840 ± 208 g (P = 0.39), respectively. The poractant alfa and beractant groups had similar rates of overall mortality (53.5% vs 56.8%), mortality in first 7 days (30.5% vs 25.8%), and beyond day 7 (16.4% vs 13.3%) (P > 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of preterm morbidities among the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to demonstrate the superiority of poractant in terms of mortality in very preterm infants with RDS. These findings need to be supported by multicenter, randomized controlled trials.

Health Economics and Outcomes of Surfactant Treatments for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants in US Level III/IV Neonatal Intensive Care Units

OBJECTIVE

To compare length of stay (LOS), costs, mechanical ventilation (MV), and mortality in preterm infants treated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with beractant (BE), calfactant (CA), and poractant alfa (PA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

This study evaluated preterm infants born between 2010 and 2013 with RDS diagnosis, gestational age of 25 to 36 weeks, birthweight of ≥500 g, and age of ≤2 days on first surfactant administration. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate all NICU outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 13,240 infants meeting the study criteria, 4136 (31.2%) received BE, 2502 (18.9%) received CA, and 6602 (49.9%) received PA. Adjusted analyses estimated similar mean LOS (BE 26.7 days, CA 27.8 days, and PA 26.2 days) and hospital costs (BE: $50,929; CA: $50,785; and PA: $50,212). Compared to PA, BE and CA were associated with greater odds of MV use on day 3 (OR = 1.56 and 1.60, respectively) and day 7 (OR = 1.39 and 1.28, respectively; all p < 0.05). Adjusted NICU mortality was significantly higher only with CA vs PA (OR = 1.51; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Adjusted NICU LOS and costs were similar among BE, CA, and PA. Infants receiving PA were less likely to be on MV at 3 and 7 days, and PA treatment was associated with lower odds of NICU mortality when compared to CA.

Comparison of Three Different Administration Positions for Intratracheal Beractant in Preterm Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of various intratracheal beractant administration positions in preterm newborns with respiratory distress syndrome.

METHODS

This study was performed on preterm newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. The inclusion criteria were being between 26 weeks and 32 weeks of gestational age, having a birth weight between 600 g and 1500 g, having received clinical and radiological confirmation for the diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) within 3 hours of life, having been born in one of the centers where the study was carried out, and having fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥ 0.40 to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter at 88-96%. Beractant was administered in four positions to Group I newborns, in two positions to Group II, and in neutral position to Group III.

RESULTS

Groups I and II consisted of 42 preterm infants in each whereas Group III included 41 preterm infants. No significant differences were detected among the groups with regards to maternal and neonatal risk factors. Groups were also similar in terms of the following complications: patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), chronic lung disease (CLD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), death within the first 3 days of life, death within the first 28 days of life, and rehospitalization within 1 month after discharge. Neither any statistically significant differences among the parameters related with surfactant administration, nor any significant statistical differences among the FiO2 levels and the saturation levels before and after the first surfactant administration among the groups were determined.

CONCLUSION

In terms of efficacy and side effects, no important difference was observed between the recommended four position beractant application, the two position administration, and the neutral position.

Less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and feasibility of a new, less invasive surfactant administration technique for beractant replacement using a specifically designed cannula in preterm infants born at <32 weeks of gestation and to compare short- and long-term outcomes between this approach and standard treatment, consisting of intubation, administration of surfactant and early extubation to nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

METHOD

This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, non-randomized, controlled pilot study with an experimental cohort of 30 patients treated with less invasive surfactant administration and a retrospective control group comprising the 30 patients most recently treated with the standard approach. Beractant (4 ml/kg) was administered as an exogenous surfactant in both groups if patients on nasal continuous positive airway pressure during the first three days of life were in need of more than 30% FiO2. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02611284.

RESULTS

In the group with less invasive surfactant administration, beractant was successfully administered in all patients. Thirteen patients (43.3%) in the group with less invasive surfactant administration required invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 1 hour during the first 3 days of life, compared with 22 (73%) in the control group (p<0.036). The rate of requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours was similar between the infants in the two groups (46% vs. 40%, respectively). There were no differences in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The administration of beractant (4 ml/kg) using a less invasive surfactant administration technique with a specifically designed cannula for administration is feasible. Moreover, early invasive mechanical ventilation exposure is significantly reduced by this method compared with the strategy involving intubation, surfactant administration and early extubation.

Efficacy of surfactant-TA, calfactant and poractant alfa for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of the new drug calfactant with the commonly used drugs surfactant-TA and poractant alfa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 332 preterm infants at 24-31 weeks' gestation with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were enrolled and allocated to three groups according to the surfactant instilled; Group 1 (n=146, surfactant-TA), Group 2 (n=96, calfactant), and Group 3 (n=90, poractant alfa). The diagnosis of RDS and the decision to replace the pulmonary surfactant were left to the attending physician and based on patient severity determined by chest radiography and blood gas analysis. Data were collected and reviewed retrospectively using patient medical records.

RESULTS

Demographic factors including gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score, clinical risk index for babies II score, and maternal status before delivery were not different between the study groups. Instances of surfactant redosing and pulmonary air leaks, as well as duration of mechanical ventilation, were also not different. Rates of patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage (≥grade III), periventricular leukomalacia, high stage retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis (≥stage II), and mortality were also similar, as was duration of hospital stay. Cases of pulmonary hemorrhage and moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia were increased in Group 3.

CONCLUSION

Calfactant is equally as effective as surfactant-TA and poractant alfa. This was the first study comparing the efficacy of surfactant-TA, calfactant, and poractant alfa in a large number of preterm infants in Korea. Further randomized prospective studies on these surfactants are needed.

Mortality in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with poractant alfa, calfactant or beractant: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare all-cause in-hospital mortality in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) treated with poractant alfa, calfactant or beractant.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of 14 173 preterm infants with RDS, treated with one of three surfactants between 2005 and 2009, using the Premier Database was done. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression modeling, adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors was performed.

RESULT

Calfactant treatment was associated with a 49.6% greater likelihood of death than poractant alfa (odds ratio (OR): 1.496, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.014-2.209, P=0.043). Beractant treatment was associated with a non-significant 37% increase in mortality, compared with poractant alfa (OR: 1.370, 95% CI: 0.996-1.885, P=0.053). No differences in mortality were observed between calfactant and beractant treatment (OR: 1.092, 95% CI: 0.765-1.559, P=0.626).

CONCLUSION

Poractant alfa treatment for RDS was associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of death when compared with calfactant and a trend toward reduced mortality when compared with beractant.

A Cost Minimization Comparison of Two Surfactants-Beractant and Poractant alfa-Based Upon Prospectively Designed, Comparative Clinical Trial Data

OBJECTIVES

To compare the pharmacoeconomic profiles of beractant (Survanta(®), Ross Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) and poractant alfa (Curosurf(®), DEY LP, Napa, CA) via a cost-minimization analysis.

METHODS

This analysis was based upon clinical data from two previously published studies (Speer C, et al. Arch Dis Child 1995;72: F8-13; and Ramanathan R, et al. Am J Perinatol 2004; 21:109-19) where investigators found significant differences in the number of doses required to achieve a similar clinical response. Our analyses employed several models based upon single-use or multiple-use of single-use vial scenarios, average wholesale pricing, and costs computed on a per-patient basis. Model 1 involved single-dose vials and mean weight of the infants (both trials). Models 2 and 3, based on individual patient weights, assessed single-dose and multiple-use of single-dose vials cost scenarios, respectively. Individual patient weights allowed for statistical evaluation in Models 2 and 3.

RESULTS

Model 1 savings with poractant alfa treatment was $949.67 (53%) based upon Speer and $617.90 (46%) based upon Ramanathan. Models 2 and 3 reported savings for poractant alfa of $220.50 (20%) (P = 0.11) and $180 (20%) (P = 0.018), respectively over beractant.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses would suggest poractant alfa may offer a less costly, clinically-equivalent option. Savings may vary with vial usage and mix, patient weight distribution, and how surfactants are used in practice. Institutions utilizing surfactants may wish to examine usage patterns, dosing protocols, and patient mix to determine what potential savings may exist.

Practical considerations in the selection and use of pulmonary surfactant therapy for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care setting

Pulmonary surfactant is the treatment of choice for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, as it significantly reduces infant morbidity and mortality. Extensive clinical trials compare the surfactant products and their optimal usage, but often the practical administration issues are less frequently discussed. Herein, a panel of respiratory therapists and neonatal nurse practitioners share their experience regarding surfactant usage. According to the panelists, the primary criteria for surfactant selection are the ability to rapidly decrease ventilatory requirements toward extubation, a low incidence of adverse effects, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use. In most cases, surfactant is most efficacious when given as early as possible where indicated. The surfactant products differ in their storage, handling, preparation, and administration traits, and this may affect rapid dosing of the surfactant during acute treatment. During and after administration, optimal response to therapy depends on efficient management of ventilator settings, which requires vigilant monitoring of the infant. Common adverse effects include endotracheal tube reflux, bradycardia, and desaturation. Using a surfactant which requires a small dosing volume may decrease the incidence of these adverse effects. An emerging trend in clinical practice is the quick extubation of the infant to nasal continuous positive airway pressure after surfactant administration. This practice can reduce the need for ventilation and reduce the risk of ventilator-related lung damage. Nebulization of surfactant may be a future avenue of delivery, but further research is required to determine its precise role. The practical considerations summarized in this discussion may be useful for other clinicians in their own practice.

Surfactant therapy in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and in near-term or term newborns with acute RDS

Many different surfactant preparations derived from animal sources, as well as synthetic surfactants, are available for the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Natural, modified surfactants containing surfactant-associated proteins appear to be more effective than non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants. Comparative trials with poractant alfa at a higher initial dose of 200 mg/kg appear to be associated with rapid weaning of FiO2, less need for additional doses, and decreased mortality in infants <32 weeks gestation when compared with beractant. Early rescue (<30 min of age) surfactant therapy is an effective method to minimize over treatment of some preterm infants who may not develop RDS. Surfactant therapy followed by rapid extubation to nasal ventilation appears to be more beneficial than continued mechanical ventilation. In near-term or term newborns with acute RDS, surfactant therapy has been shown to be 70% effective in improving respiratory failure.

A comparative pharmacoeconomic assessment of two surfactants for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The use of exogenous surfactants among preterm infants for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has led to economic and cost-effectiveness evaluations of these products. Lucinactant (Surfaxin), a novel, peptide-based, synthetic surfactant, has been shown to significantly reduce RDS-related mortality, compared with the most commonly prescribed animal-derived surfactant, beractant (Survanta). Infants who survive expend significant healthcare resources; therefore, the impact of improved survival through 1-year corrected age was evaluated in a prospectively defined pharmacoeconomic analysis. The objectives of this study were to estimate the healthcare resource utilization, economic impact, and cost-effectiveness of lucinactant versus beractant for the prevention of RDS among surviving very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants weighing 600 to 1250 grams.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the healthcare resource utilization, economic impact, and cost-effectiveness of lucinactant versus beractant.

RESULTS

Infants who received lucinactant had fewer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) days and fewer NICU days on mechanical ventilation compared with infants who received beractant. Total healthcare costs for the initial stay in the NICU were lower by $8,803 among infants who received lucinactant compared with infants who received beractant. The incremental cost per life saved was $40,309 for lucinactant compared with beractant.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of lucinactant to surviving VLBW preterm infants resulted in fewer NICU days and fewer NICU days on mechanical ventilation compared with beractant. Fewer NICU days translates into lower total costs among infants who received lucinactant. This comprehensive pharmacoeconomic analysis indicates that lucinactant is a cost-effective therapy for the prevention of RDS among preterm infants.

Infasurf and curosurf: theoretical and practical considerations with new surfactants

Type II pneumocytes, normally responsible for surfactant production and release, are insufficiently formed and differentiated in the premature infant born before 34 weeks' gestation. Without an adequate amount of pulmonary surfactant, alveolar surface tension increases, leading to collapse and decreased lung compliance. Pulmonary surfactants are naturally occurring substances made of lipids and proteins. They lower surface tension at the interface between the air in the lungs, specifically at the alveoli, and the blood in the capillaries. This review examines the relative benefits of the two most recently marketed surfactants, calfactan (Infasurf) and poractant alfa (Curosurf).