Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Warfarin in Left Ventricular Thrombus: Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function can develop LV thrombus, a potentially life-threatening condition due to risk of stroke and embolization. Conventional treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g., warfarin) puts patients at risk of bleeding, and the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) appears promising, although data are scant. We searched the published English language literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with VKAs in LV thrombus. End points were failure to resolve, thromboembolic events (stroke, embolism), bleeding, or any adverse event (composite of thromboembolism or bleeding), or all-cause death. Data were pooled and analyzed in hierarchical Bayesian models. In three eligible RCTs, 141 patients were studied during an average of 4.6 months (53.8 patient-years; n = 71 assigned to DOAC, n = 70 assigned to VKA). A similar number of patients in each treatment arm demonstrated failure to resolve (DOAC: 14/71 vs. VKA: 15/70) and death events (3/71 vs. 4/70). However, patients on DOACs suffered fewer strokes/thromboembolic events (1/71 vs. 7/70; log odds ratio [OR], -2.02 [95% credible interval (CI95 ), -4.53 to -0.31]) and fewer bleeding events (2/71 vs. 9/70; log OR, -1.62 [CI95 , -3.43 to -0.26]), leading to fewer patients on DOACs with any adverse event versus VKAs (3/71 vs. 16/70; log OR, -1.93 [CI95 , -3.33 to -0.75]). In conclusion, pooled analysis of RCT data favors DOACs over VKAs in patients with LV thrombus in terms of both efficacy and safety.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists: Which one is more effective in atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The optimal approach for anticoagulation in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a subject of debate. A meta-analysis using updated evidence to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves to address this controversy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up until March 2023. The search aimed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety outcomes of both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes of interest were major bleeding and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrated that despite the difference was not significant, the hazard of all-cause mortality was 2.5% higher in the DOAC group (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.88, 1.19], p-value = .75). Similarly, the hazard of stroke (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.87, 1.32], p-value = .71) and major bleeding (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = [0.89, 1.38], p-value = .36) were found to be respectively 3.2 and 10.7% higher in the DOAC group, although the difference was not significant. However, the hazard of intracranial hemorrhage was found to be 28.8 lower in the DOAC treatment group (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = [0.39, 1.31], p-value = .27), which again was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve surgery and presenting with AF afterward, DOAC and VKA are similar regarding life-threatening and all-cause mortality outcomes, including major bleeding, stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage.

Apixaban for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism After Lung Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulation therapy over warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty and a lack of data supporting the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in lung transplant recipients. Additionally, there are unique considerations for this population, such as labile renal function and drug interactions.

PROJECT AIMS

The objective of this program evaluation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban therapy for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Medical records of all adult lung transplant recipients who received apixaban for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treatment between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of bleeding. Efficacy was evaluated by the recurrence of blood clots or the incidence of stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 134 recipients were included in the review. Thromboembolisms occurred in 14 recipients (10%), and none experienced a stroke. Bleeding occurred in 12 recipients (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this evaluation were similar to those seen in smaller studies of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients, especially in recipients taking interacting azole antifungals. Prospective, comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Renal infarction in a patient with thyrotoxicosis-induced atrial fibrillation treated successfully with dabigatran, a case report and literature review

Renal infarction is an underdiagnosed condition with multiple possible causes, including atrial fibrillation. The treatment approach includes percutaneous endovascular therapy (PET) to restore blood flow, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, or combination therapy, depending on the patient's status and available modalities. Warfarin is the standard anticoagulation therapy, although direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy is getting more popular. Here, we present a 60-year-old male patient with hyperthyroidism complicated by acute renal infarction, which was successfully treated with dabigatran, evident by non-recurrence and restoration of blood flow in a follow-up CT angiogram. This case report may open the door for the use of DOAC in acute renal infarction though more studies are needed to prove the efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban in obese patients with acute thrombosis/embolism

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significant advantages over vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of venous thromboembolism and as prophylaxis against recurrence. However, there is inadequate data to support the safety and efficacy of DOACs in the morbidly obese, and warfarin treatment is currently recommended by the International Society of Hemostasis and Thrombosis for this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of outcomes in 499 patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m² admitted from January 2013 to January 2020 with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and treated with either rivaroxaban (n=296) or apixaban (n=203).

RESULTS

There were 38 (7.6%) bleeding and clotting events within 60 days of the initiation of DOACs, of which 35 (7.0%) were bleeding events and 3 (0.6%) were clotting events. Patients treated with rivaroxaban had more bleeding episodes (23, 7.8% vs. 12, 5.9%) and higher mortality (21, 7.1% vs. 13, 6.4%) compared with those treated with apixaban; however, these differences were not statistically significant (p=.427 and p=.764, respectively). Most of the bleeding occurred in the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that apixaban and rivaroxaban are not associated with an increase in VTE recurrence in the morbidly obese; however, bleeding rates were slightly higher in the rivaroxaban group compared to the apixaban group.

Thrombocytopenia Due to Direct Oral Anticoagulation and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in the general population for anticoagulation. However, rare adverse effects from these medications are still being discovered. Thrombocytopenia has previously been reported with these medications, but its clinical significance is still unknown. We present a patient who developed thrombocytopenia from apixaban and who subsequently developed a severe presentation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) from enoxaparin. This raises the possibility that thrombocytopenia from oral anticoagulants increases the likelihood of the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Knowledge of Anticoagulation Among Saudi Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Knowledge about oral anticoagulant treatment can impact treatment outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, evidence is scarce regarding the knowledge of oral anticoagulants among Saudi patients with atrial fibrillation. Hence, this study aimed to assess the level of anticoagulation knowledge among patients with atrial fibrillation taking oral anticoagulants. Methodology A survey using a cross-sectional study design was conducted among patients with a confirmed diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in a tertiary care setting. The Oral Anticoagulation Knowledge Tool (AKT), a 33-item, self-administered questionnaire, was used to assess the knowledge of anticoagulation. Results A total of 290 patients with a median age of 67 years participated in the survey. More than half of those surveyed (56.2%) were females. Overall, 195 (67.2%) patients had an overall adequate anticoagulation knowledge. The median knowledge score of participants on warfarin was significantly higher than those on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (p < 0.001). Only age was found to be a predictor of AKT. Increasing age was associated with fewer odds of adequate AKT. For every one-year increase in age, the knowledge score decreased by 0.08 (95% confidence interval: -0.13 to -0.04). Conclusions This study found significant knowledge gaps among Saudi patients with atrial fibrillation taking oral anticoagulants. Advancing age was inversely associated with oral anticoagulation knowledge.

The Effect of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Use in Trauma Patients on Mortality and Length of Stay

BACKGROUND

Though many trauma patients are on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (AAT), there are few generalizable data on the risks for these patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy on mortality and length of stay (LOS) in general trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients in the institutional trauma registry during 2019 to determine AAT use on admission and discharge. Outcomes were compared using standard statistics.

RESULTS

Of 2261 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 2 were excluded due to an incomplete medication reconciliation, resulting in 2259 patients. Patients on AAT had a higher mortality (4.5% vs 2.1%). On multivariable analysis, preadmission AC (odds ratio OR, 3.325, P = .001), age (OR 1.040, P < .001), and injury severity score ((ISS) 1.094, P < .001) were associated with mortality. Anticoagulation use was also associated with longer LOS on multivariable analysis (OR: 1.626, P = .005). Antiplatelet use was not associated with higher mortality or longer LOS. More patients on AAT were unable to be discharged home. However, patients on AAT did not have a greater blood transfusion requirement or need more hemorrhage control procedures. Lastly, 23.7% of patients on preadmission AAT were not discharged on any AAT.

DISCUSSION

These data demonstrate that patients on AC, but not AP, have greater mortality and longer hospital LOS. This may provide guidance for those being newly started on AAT. Further work to determine which patients benefit most from restarting AAT would lead to improvement in the care of trauma patients.

Thrombotic complications with interruption of direct oral anticoagulants in dermatologic surgery

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, are increasingly being used to provide prophylaxis and treatment for arterial and venous thromboembolism. Multiple procedural subspecialties have implemented guidelines detailing time frames for perioperative DOAC interruption; however, the impact of perioperative DOAC interruption in patients undergoing dermatologic surgery is currently unknown, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 30-day postoperative rate of thrombotic complications (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or a history of DVT who underwent perioperative DOAC interruption during dermatologic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was performed of all patients with AF or a history of DVT who underwent perioperative DOAC interruption during dermatologic surgery at Advanced Dermatologic Surgery and the University of Kansas Medical Center between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2020.

RESULTS

Among 806 operations, comprising 750 Mohs micrographic operations (93.1%) and 56 excisions (6.9%), 1 patient (0.14% of patients with AF) sustained a transient ischemic attack and 2 patients (0.25% of all patients) sustained minor bleeding complications during the 30-day postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative DOAC interruption appears to be safe and efficacious in dermatologic surgery.

Dissolution of metastatic thymic carcinoma-associated right atrial thrombus with rivaroxaban

Thymic carcinoma typically exhibits more clinically aggressive behavior and portends a worse prognosis as compared to thymoma. Venous thromboembolism is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in oncologic patients. Traditionally, the standard-of-care management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism has been therapeutic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparins; however, with the advent of direct oral anticoagulants, there is an ongoing paradigm shift to transition to these novel agents in an attempt to attenuate cancer-associated venous thromboembolism events. We describe an exceedingly rare case of metastatic thymic carcinoma–associated right atrial thrombus with high-risk embolic features, which subsequently underwent near-complete dissolution with rivaroxaban after 3 months.

Prescribing and Safety of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Chronic Hemodialysis

ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) were excluded from landmark trials evaluating direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective was to evaluate prescribing and bleeding with DOACs compared to warfarin in AF patients with chronic HD. A retrospective, observational study of patients receiving warfarin or DOAC from April 2010-April 2016 from area health system hospitals and Dialysis Clinics, Inc. records. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and chi-square. Ninety-one patients were included with warfarin as the initial OAC in most patients (n = 76) at average dose of 29 mg/week. Fifteen patients were initially prescribed apixaban (n = 12) or dabigatran (n = 3). Most switches in OAC therapy were to apixaban. When the initial OAC was a DOAC, it was not dosed appropriately in five with one bleed, two dosed appropriately had bleeds. When initial warfarin was switched to a DOAC, it was not dosed appropriately in seven with five bleeds. More bleeds occurred with warfarin alone (n = 18) vs. those on warfarin switched to DOAC (n = 5) vs. DOAC alone (n = 3), p = 0.022. All but four patients that bled had HAS-BLED scores three or higher. Warfarin was most often prescribed and associated with a higher incidence of bleeding compared to DOACs in this population of patients at high risk for bleeding. Larger studies should be conducted to analyze the impact of DOAC dose appropriateness on safety and clinical outcomes.

Direct oral anticoagulants and cardiac surgery: A descriptive study of preoperative management and postoperative outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Recommendations for perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment in cardiac surgery are lacking. To establish a standardized approach for these patients, we compared hemorrhagic complications and clinical outcomes in patients on DOAC medication, patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and patients without preoperative anticoagulation.

METHODS

All 3 groups underwent major cardiac surgery and were retrospectively analyzed: patients on DOAC were advised to take their last DOAC dose 4 days before hospital admission, and DOAC plasma levels were measured the day before surgery. In patients with plasma levels of >30 ng/mL, surgery was postponed until plasma level was below this threshold level. Postoperative chest tube drainage, bleeding complications, use of blood products, and thromboembolic events were collected for all groups.

RESULTS

A total of 5439 patients no anticoagulation, 239 patients on VKA, and 487 patients on DOAC medication were included between April 2014 and July 2017. Adjusted postoperative chest tube drainage did not differ between the DOAC and VKA groups for the strategy applied in this study (380 mL/12 hours vs 360 mL/12 hours). Moreover, secondary endpoint measures, such as rethoracotomy (30 [6.16%] vs 15 [6.28%]), 30-day-mortality 12 [2.46%] vs 7 [2.93%]), blood-product use, and stroke, were not significantly different through implementation of our standardized study management (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our standardized management for perioperative discontinuation of DOAC therapy may provide a safe approach to minimize hemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery in patients on DOACs.

Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulant treatment

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a major problem in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy. This issue has become even more pressing since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in 2009. Areas covered: Here we review current evidence related to GIB associated with oral anticoagulants, focusing on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and post-marketing observational studies. Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily and rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily increase the risk of GIB compared to warfarin. The risk increase with edoxaban is dose-dependent, while apixaban shows apparently, no increased risk. We summarize what is known about GIB risk factors for individual anticoagulants, the location of GIB in patients taking these compounds, and prevention strategies that lower the risk of GIB. Expert opinion: Recently there has been an important shift in the clinical presentation of GIB. Specifically, upper GIB has decreased with the decreased incidence of peptic ulcers due to the broad use of proton pump inhibitors and the decreased prevalence of H. pylori infections. In contrast, the incidence of lower GIB has increased, due in part to colonic diverticular bleeding and angiodysplasia in the elderly. In this population, the addition of oral anticoagulation therapy, especially DOACs, seems to increase the risk of lower GIB.