Hispanic/Latinx and Spanish Language Concordance Among Palliative Care Clinicians and Patients in Hospital Settings in California

Background: Members of racial or ethnic minority groups utilize palliative care (PC) services less than non-Hispanic White patients and multiple factors contribute to this disparity. The impact of racial, ethnic, and language (REL) concordance between patients and clinicians has been demonstrated in general medical populations, but not in PC populations. We characterized the racial and ethnic composition and languages spoken of California PC clinicians and patients to examine clinical impacts of REL concordance. Methods: Using Palliative Care Quality Network data, 15 inpatient teams were identified in California that had collected data on patient race/ethnicity and language. Patient and clinician data were analyzed using means and medians for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests to explore similarities and differences between clinician and patient data. Results: 51 clinicians from nine teams completed the survey. The largest non-White and non-English speaking groups among patients and clinicians identified as Hispanic/Latinx (31.5% of patients, 16.3% of clinicians) and as Spanish speakers (22.6% of patients, 7.5% of clinicians). There was a significantly higher proportion of Hispanic/Latinx patients compared to clinicians (p-value 0.01), with Southern California demonstrating the largest difference (30.4% of patients vs. 10.7 % of clinicians, p-value 0.01). Similar proportions of patients and clinicians reported Spanish fluency (22.6% vs 27.5%, p-value 0.31). Discussion: We found significant differences in the racial/ethnic distributions of Hispanic/Latinx patients and clinicians in California, prompting consideration of whether a lack of representation of Hispanic/Latinx clinicians relative to the patient population may contribute to lower palliative care utilization among Hispanic/Latinx patients.

Prospective Cohort Study on the Impact of Early Versus Late Inpatient Palliative Care on Length of Stay and Cost of Care

Aim: To evaluate the impact of early vs late palliative care on (1) length of stay (LOS) in the context of expected LOS measures and (2) total cost of care to the hospital for each patient. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at a single large academic medical center on patients who received an inpatient palliative care consultation. The two cohorts were early palliative care (within 3 days of admission) and late palliative care (after 3 days of admission). Comparisons were made between patients' actual LOS, expected LOS, and total hospital costs between both cohorts. Results: Compared to the late palliative care cohort (N = 126), patients who received early palliative care (N = 68) had a significantly shorter LOS (P < .001) and also performed better compared to CMS-Expected LOS standards (Observed/Expected 3.1 vs 1.5 respectively; P < .001). Early palliative care patients also saw an average decline of $1431 in total costs 1-day pre/post consult as opposed to a more modest $403 decline in the later palliative care cohort (P < .001). Similarly, patients who received early palliative care had a $5839 decline in aggregated total 3-day costs, as opposed to a $1478 decline in those who received late palliative care (P < .001). Conclusions: In the competitive and rapidly evolving healthcare system, the opportunity to suppress costs and lower patient LOS has increasing importance. Our study strongly supports the implementation of earlier palliative care intervention to assist hospitals in approaching LOS targets and reducing patient costs.

Inpatient end-of-life care delivery: discordance and concordance analysis of Canadian palliative care professionals' and South Asian family caregivers' perspectives

Background

End-of-life care involves a multitude of functions delivered by a team of healthcare professionals. Family caregivers get involved in every aspect of the palliative care journey. Meeting the needs of ethnically diverse patients can be a daunting task for Western-trained healthcare professionals. Family and professional caregivers need to have a mutual understanding of perspectives and expectations to integrate family caregivers into end-of-life care. The South Asian population in Canada is fast growing, and very little is known about their understanding and expectations of end-of-life care.

Methods

The purpose is to provide research-based knowledge on discordances and concordances of encounters and perceptions of end-of-life care delivery between South Asian family caregivers and palliative care health professionals. Individual interviews were conducted among seven palliative care professionals, in a tertiary care center, and seven South Asian family caregivers who have provided care, in the same inpatient center, for the same period. The constant comparison, a component of the grounded theory approach, was employed to compare the two types of caregivers' perspectives that emerged in the qualitative data.

Findings

The family caregivers were divided in their perception based on death denial and acceptance. The findings weaved the discordances and concordances of meaning assigned to palliative care to the three themes that emerged: the role of the family caregiver, communication needs and challenges, and barriers to the family caregiver participation in decision-making. The discordance between professionals and family caregivers arose in the death-denial group and concorded with the death-accepted group. The findings revealed a consequence of the survival optimistic bias, as creating dissatisfaction toward the end-of-life care delivery system when the palliative care professionals prognosticate imminent end-of-life.

Conclusion

The family caregivers' interactions and encounters were shaped by their acceptance or denial of the death of their family member in care. Gaining conceptual clarity on the meaning of palliative care and providing education on the process of end-of-life care delivery are crucial to integrating ethnically diverse family caregivers into the decision-making process.

A Retrospective Review of the Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients through an Integrated Palliative Care Model during the First Wave of the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created surges of rapidly deteriorating patients straining health care necessitating the evaluation of novel models of palliative care (PC) integration to reduce patient suffering and hospital strain. Objective: To evaluate an integrated PC model's effect on code status change. Design: This is an observational retrospective study. Setting: Urban quaternary referral center in the southeastern United States from April 6th to August 20th, 2020. Patients: All patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit and stepdown unit were diagnosed with COVID-19. Measurements: Code status change, multivariate regression on patient characteristics. Results: In total, 79.7% (98/123) patients were full code at admission. After PC consultation, 33.3% (41/123) patients remained full code, 13.0% (16/123) were do not resuscitate (DNR), and 53.6% (66/123) changed to DNR/do not intubate (DNI). An ordinal logistic model determined that consultation location (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, p = 0.017) and patient age (OR 1.09, p < 0.001) were predictive of code status change to DNR/DNI. Conclusion: Within an integrated PC model, PC consultation was associated with code status change. The effect of an integrated PC model warrants further study in comparison with a traditional PC model in a similar patient cohort.

Inpatient Pediatric Palliative Care Consult Requests and Recommendations

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the requests for and recommendations from inpatient pediatric palliative care (PPC) consults and whether they differ by patient location (ward vs. intensive care unit) or patient type (new vs. established with PPC).

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing PPC consult requests and recommendations for children who received a PPC consult between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. Comparisons were made by patient location and patient type using bivariate statistics.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-seven PPC encounters were evaluated. Symptoms were more likely to be addressed in consults for ward patients than for intensive care unit patients. Compared with established patients, consults for new patients occurred significantly later in the hospital course and were more likely to be for psychosocial support or goals of care.

DISCUSSION

We found variability in PPC consult requests and recommendations that may inform future work and targeted education for primary providers.

Doing More with the Same: Comparing Public and Private Hospital Palliative Care within California

Background: Public and private hospitals treat different patient populations, which may impact resources to deliver palliative care (PC). Objectives: Compare public and private hospital PC service structures, processes, and treatment outcomes. Design: Retrospective data analysis of the Palliative Care Quality Network between 2018 and 2019. Settings/Subjects: Six public and 40 private California hospitals provided PC consultations to 4244 and 38,354 adults, respectively. Measurements: PC team and patient characteristics, care processes, and treatment outcomes. Results: Public and private hospital PC services had similar full-time equivalent/100 beds (1.2 vs. 1.4, p = 0.4). Public hospital patients were younger (65.2 vs. 73.5, p < 0.001), less likely to be non-Hispanic Caucasian (22.5% vs. 57.5%, p < 0.001), or English speaking (51.1% vs. 79.9%, p < 0.001). Public hospital patients had more moderate/severe pain (21.3% vs. 19.3, p < 0.03), anxiety (12.4% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001), nausea (6.5% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), and dyspnea (11.0% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). Both hospitals equally improved pain (70.9% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.83) and nausea (82.0% vs. 87.6%, p = 0.09), but public hospitals were less effective at improving anxiety (67.3% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.002) and dyspnea (58.4% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.05). Although there was no difference in hospital length of stay (public = 10.2 days vs. private = 9.5 days, p = 0.07), public hospitals conducted more patient visits (2.6 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001). They also more often clarified code status (87.7% vs. 84.4%, p < 0.001) and surrogate decision maker (94.9% vs. 89.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Public hospital PC teams treat a more diverse symptomatic population. Yet, they achieved comparable outcomes with similar staffing to private hospitals. These findings have important ramifications for policy makers and public institution leaders.

An Exploratory Study of Demographics and Outcomes for Patients Seen by Specialist Palliative Care Social Work in the Inpatient Setting at an Academic Medical Center

CONTEXT

Specialist palliative care social work (PCSW) across a four-team palliative care (PC) service in the inpatient setting at a tertiary academic medical center.

OBJECTIVES

to describe the population of patients seen by inpatient PCSW, quantification of the involvement of PCSW in PC consultations, as well as comparisons of patient characteristics for those seen by PCSW and the overall population seen by the PC team.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a tertiary academic medical center between January, 1 2015 and October 31, 2019 who received a PC consult.

RESULTS

Over the study period, PCSW saw 2,381 out of the 4907 patients seen by the palliative care teams for a PCSW penetration rate of 52% with an 83% increase in the percent of consults seen by PCSW and a 133% increase in PCSW staffing over the study period. Compared to all PC consults, when PCSW was involved in the case, the LOS is longer (average 15.6d vs. 14.4d; P = 0.0062); goals of care are more likely to be addressed (90.7% vs. 87.4%, P = 0.004); dyspnea was more likely to improve (43.3% vs. 31.9%, P = 0.018) and pain was less likely to improve (28.2% vs. 49.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Involvement of PCSW increased dramatically over the study period. Compared to the rest of the PC team, when PCSW was involved, length of stay was longer, whole-person care components were more likely to be addressed, dyspnea was significantly improved, and pain was significantly worse when compared to those consults not seen by PCSW. Other symptoms such as nausea and anxiety as well as discharge characteristics such as death or hospice discharge were not significantly different with involvement of PCSW.

Symptom trajectories for palliative care inpatients with and without hyperactive delirium in the last week of life

AIMS

Hyperactive delirium (HD) is a common and distressing symptom among palliative care patients. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of HD and associated symptoms among palliative care inpatients and evaluate relationships between HD development and symptom trajectories in this population.

DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for all patients who died in a large Australian specialist palliative care unit between 1 January and 31 December 2019. Patients were assessed daily using the Symptoms Assessment Scale (SAS) and Palliative Care Problem Severity Scale (PCPSS). Multilevel models were used to estimate the differences in symptoms trajectories in the last 7 days of life between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 501 included patients, 64.5% (323) had an episode of HD. For 30% (95) of patients, HD occurred prior to admission. Compared with patients without HD, those with HD had significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for four of the seven SAS symptoms (sleep problems, appetite, fatigue and pain; OR range: 1.94-4.48, p < .05), and all four PCPSS items (OR range: 2.00-3.00, p < .05) in the last week of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care inpatients commonly experience HD in their last week of life. There are higher levels of symptom distress, complexity, psychological concerns and family/carer concerns among patients with HD compared with those without HD.

IMPACT

The high prevalence of HD, and its association with higher levels of symptom distress, highlights the importance of routine screening and optimal management for HD among palliative care patients. Given the widely recognized challenges facing palliative care professionals in assessment and management of delirium, provision of relevant training among these professionals is recommended.

Associations between Reason for Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation, Timing, and Cost Savings

Background: Specialty palliative care (SPC) provides patient-centered care to people with serious illness and may reduce costs. Specific cost-saving functions of SPC remain unclear. Objectives: (1) To assess the effect of SPC on inpatient costs and length of stay (LOS) and (2) to evaluate differences in costs by indication and timing of SPC. Design: Case-control with in patients who received an SPC consultation and propensity matched controls. Setting: One large U.S. integrated delivery finance system. Measurements: Using administrative data, we assessed costs associated with inpatient stays, a subset of whom received an SPC consultation. Consultations were stratified by reasons based on physician discretion: goals of care, pain management, hospice evaluation, nonpain symptom management, or support. The primary outcome was total operating costs and the secondary outcome was hospital LOS. Results: In total, 1404 patients with SPC consultations associated with unique hospital encounters were matched with 2806 controls. Total operating costs were lower for patients who received an SPC consultation when the consultation was within 0 to 1 days of admission ($6,924 vs. $7,635, p = 0.002). Likewise, LOS was shorter (4.3 vs. 4.7 days, p < 0.001). Upon stratification by reason, goals-of-care consultations early in the hospital stay (days 0-1) were associated with reduced total operating costs ($7,205 vs. $8,677, p < 0.001). Costs were higher for pain management consultations ($7,727 vs. $6,914, p = 0.047). Consultation for hospice evaluation was associated with lower costs, particularly when early (hospital days 0-1: $4,125 vs. $7,415, p < 0.001). Conclusions: SPC was associated with significant cost saving and decreased LOS when occurring early in a hospitalization and used for goals-of-care and hospice evaluation.

Does Inpatient Palliative Care Facilitate Home-Based Palliative Care Postdischarge? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Evidence of the impact of inpatient palliative care on receiving home-based palliative care remains limited.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine, at a population level, the association between receiving inpatient palliative care and home-based palliative care postdischarge.

Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the association between receiving inpatient palliative care and home-based palliative care within 21 days of hospital discharge among decedents in the last six months of life.

Setting/Subjects: We captured all decedents who were discharged alive from an acute care hospital in their last 180 days of life between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2017, in Ontario, Canada. The index event was the first hospital discharge furthest away from death (i.e., closest to 180 days before death).

Results: Decedents who had inpatient palliative care were significantly more likely to receive home-based palliative care after discharge (80.0% vs. 20.1%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates, the odds of receiving home-based palliative care were 11.3 times higher for those with inpatient palliative care (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4–13.5; p < 0.001). The strength of the association incrementally decreased as death approached. The odds of receiving home-based palliative care after a hospital discharge 60 days before death were 7.7 times greater for those who received inpatient palliative care (95% CI: 6.0–9.8).

Conclusion: Inpatient palliative care offers a distinct opportunity to improve transitional care between hospital and home, through enhancing access to home-based palliative care.

Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of hyperactive delirium in advanced cancer patients between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care

Background

Hyperactive delirium is known to increase family distress and the burden on health care providers. We compared the prevalence and associated factors of agitated delirium in advanced cancer patients between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care on admission and at 3 days before death.

Methods

This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of two multicenter, prospective cohort studies of advanced cancer patients, which were performed at 23 palliative care units (PCUs) between Jan and Dec 2017, and on 45 palliative home care services between July and Dec 2017.

Results

In total, 2998 patients were enrolled and 2829 were analyzed in this study: 1883 patients in PCUs and 947 patients in palliative home care. The prevalence of agitated delirium between PCUs and palliative home care was 5.2% (95% CI: 4.2% ‐ 6.3%) vs. 1.4% (0.7% ‐ 2.3%) on admission (p < 0.001) and 7.6% (6.4% ‐ 8.9%) vs. 5.4% (4.0% ‐ 7.0%) 3 days before death (p < 0.001). However, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the place of care was not significantly associated with the prevalence of agitated delirium at 3 days before death after adjusting for prognostic factors, physical risk factors, and symptoms.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in the prevalence of agitated delirium at 3 days before death between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care after adjusting for the patient background, prognostic factors, symptoms, and treatment.

Characteristics of People with Dementia vs Other Conditions on Admission to Inpatient Palliative Care

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to (1) describe the clinical characteristics and symptoms of people diagnosed with dementia at the time of admission to inpatient palliative care; and (2) compare the nature and severity of these palliative care-related problems to patients with other chronic diseases.

DESIGN

Descriptive study using assessment data on point of care outcomes (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018).

SETTING

A total of 129 inpatient palliative care services participating in the Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 29,971 patients with a primary diagnosis of dementia (n = 1,872), lung cancer (n = 19,499), cardiovascular disease (CVD, n = 5,079), stroke (n = 2,659), or motor neuron disease (MND, n = 862).

MEASUREMENTS

This study reported the data collected at the time of admission to inpatient palliative care services including patients' self-rated levels of distress from seven common physical symptoms, clinician-rated symptom severity, functional dependency, and performance status. Other data analyzed included number of admissions, length of inpatient stay, and palliative care phases.

RESULTS

At the time of admission to inpatient palliative care services, relative to patients with lung cancer, CVD, and MND, people with dementia presented with lower levels of distress from most symptoms (odds ratios [ORs] range from .15 to .80; P < .05 for all) but higher levels of functional impairment (ORs range from 3.02 to 8.62; P < .001 for all), and they needed more assistance with basic activities of daily living (ORs range from 3.83 to 12.24; P < .001 for all). The trends were mostly the opposite direction when compared with stroke patients. Patients with dementia tended to receive inpatient palliative care later than those with lung cancer and MND.

CONCLUSION

The unique pattern of palliative care problems experienced by people with dementia, as well as the skills of the relevant health services, need to be considered when deciding on the best location of care for each individual. Access to appropriately trained palliative care clinicians is important for people with high levels of physical or psychological concerns, irrespective of the care setting or diagnosis. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1825-1833, 2020.

Underprescription of Step III Opioids in French Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain: A Call for Integrated Early Palliative Care in Oncology

CONTEXT

Chronic pain (CP) is a major concern in cancer survivors. Often under-reported by patients, it is both underassessed and undertreated by care providers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess CP prevalence and related treatment in cancer survivors five years after diagnosis and to identify factors associated with prescribing opioids among survivors with CP, focusing on access to palliative care (PC).

METHODS

In 2015-2016, we interviewed 4174 French patients diagnosed with cancer five years previously. Combining patient-reported and clinical-reported outcomes together with medicoadministrative data, we studied factors associated with Step II and Step III opioid prescriptions in cancer survivors with CP. We performed multinomial logistic regression adjusting for various covariates, including self-reported health status variables and inpatient PC.

RESULTS

Five years after cancer diagnosis, 63.5% of the respondents reported current CP (i.e., pain lasting three months or more). Of these, 64.6% and 14.4% were prescribed at least one Step II or Step III opioid, respectively. Only 1.9% had had inpatient PC since diagnosis. After adjustment for age, gender, clinical and self-reported variables, we found that the latter were more likely to receive Step III opioids (adjusted relative risk ratio 5.33; 95% CI 1.15, 24.58).

CONCLUSION

This study showed a high prevalence of CP five years after cancer diagnosis. Step III opioids were underprescribed but positively associated with inpatient PC. PC access in France remains limited, especially among cancer survivors. Integrating PC in oncology is essential to provide the best cancer-related symptoms management.

Association of Inpatient Palliative Care with Health Care Utilization and Postdischarge Outcomes among Medicare Beneficiaries with End Stage Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Palliative care may improve quality of life and reduce the cost of care for patients with chronic illness, but utilization and cost implications of palliative care in ESKD have not been evaluated. We sought to determine the association of inpatient palliative care with health care utilization and postdischarge outcomes in ESKD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In analyses stratified by whether patients died during the index hospitalization, we identified Medicare beneficiaries with ESKD who received inpatient palliative care, ascertained by provider specialty codes, between 2012 and 2013. These patients were matched to hospitalized patients who received usual care using propensity scores. Primary outcomes were length of stay and hospitalization costs. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission and hospice enrollment.

RESULTS

Inpatient palliative care occurred in <1% of hospitalizations lasting >2 days. Among the decedent cohort (n=1308), inpatient palliative care was associated with a 21% shorter length of stay (-4.2 days; 95% confidence interval, -5.6 to -2.9 days) and 14% lower hospitalization costs (-$10,698; 95% confidence interval, -$17,553 to -$3843) compared with usual care. Among the nondecedent cohort (n=5024), inpatient palliative care was associated with no difference in length of stay (0.4 days; 95% confidence interval, -0.3 to 1.0 days) and 11% higher hospitalization costs ($4275; 95% confidence interval, $1984 to $6567) compared with usual care. In the 30-day postdischarge period, patients who received inpatient palliative care had higher likelihood of hospice enrollment (hazard ratio, 8.3; 95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 10.5) and lower likelihood of rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ESKD who died in the hospital, inpatient palliative care was associated with shorter hospitalizations and lower costs. Among those who survived to discharge, inpatient palliative care was associated with no difference in length of stay and higher hospitalization costs but markedly higher hospice use and fewer readmissions after discharge.

Palliative Care Utilization among Patients Admitted for Gastrointestinal and Thoracic Cancers

BACKGROUND

Although a growing body of literature recommends the early initiation of palliative care (PC), the use of PC remains variable.

OBJECTIVE

The current study sought to describe the use of PC and to identify factors associated with the use of inpatient PC.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Inpatient Sample.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

Patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal and/or thoracic cancer from 2012 to 2013.

MEASUREMENTS

In-hospital length of stay (LOS), morbidity, mortality, and total charges.

RESULTS

A total of 282,899 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria of whom, 24,100 (8.5%) patients received a PC consultation during their inpatient admission. Patients who received PC were more likely to have a longer LOS (LOS >14 days: 5.4% vs. 9.4%) and were more likely to develop a postoperative complication (28.3% vs. 45.9%, both p < 0.001). Inpatient mortality was significantly higher among patients who had received PC than those who did not (5.4% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patient age (age ≥75 years: Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.54, 95% CI: 2.33-2.78), comorbidity (CCI >6: OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.48-2.74), and admission to larger hospitals (reference small: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.14-1.25) were associated with greater odds of receiving PC (all p < 0.05). Patients who underwent a major operation during their inpatient admission demonstrated 79% lower odds of receiving PC (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.20-0.22, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients admitted for cancer, PC services were used in 8.5% of patients during their inpatient admission with surgical patients being 79% less likely to receive a PC consultation. Further research is required to delineate the barriers to the use of PC so as to promote the use of PC among high-risk patients.

Impact of Inpatient Palliative Care on Quality of End-of-Life Care and Downstream Acute and Postacute Care Utilization

BACKGROUND

Additional evidence is needed regarding the impact of inpatient palliative care (IPC) on the quality of end-of-life care and downstream utilization.

AIM

Examine the effects of IPC on quality of end-of-life care and acute and postacute care use in a large integrated system.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort design.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Adult decedents from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014, who had at least one hospitalization at 11 Kaiser Permanente Southern California medical centers in the 12 months before death and not hospitalized for a trauma-related condition or receiving home-based PC or hospice were included in the cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores was used to compare outcomes between patients exposed to IPC (n = 3742) and controls (n = 12,755) who never received IPC before death.

RESULTS

Patients who received IPC were more likely to enroll in home-based PC or hospice (69% vs. 43%) and were less likely to die in a hospital (15% vs. 29%) or intensive care (2% vs. 9%) compared with controls (all, p < 0.001). IPC exposure was associated with higher risk for rehospitalization (HR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25) and more frequent emergency department visits (RR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.26) with no increase in postacute care use compared with controls. Stratified analyses showed that IPC effects on acute care utilization were dependent on code status.

CONCLUSION

IPC exposure was associated with higher enrollment in home-based PC/hospice and more deaths at home. The increased acute care utilization by the IPC group may reflect persistent confounding by indication.

Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation and 30-Day Readmissions in Oncology

BACKGROUND

Prior research indicates that hospice and palliative care delivered in outpatient settings are associated with reduced hospital readmissions for cancer patients. However, little is known about how inpatient palliative care affects readmissions in oncology.

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations among inpatient palliative care consultation, hospice use (discharge), and 30-day readmissions among patients with solid tumor cancers.

METHODS

We identified all live discharges from a large tertiary cancer hospital between 2010 and 2016. Palliative care consult data were abstracted from medical charts and linked to hospital encounter data. Propensity scores were used to match palliative care consult to usual care encounters. Modified Poisson regression models estimated adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 30-day readmissions and hospice discharge. We compared predicted probabilities of readmission for palliative care consultation with hospice discharge, without hospice discharge, and usual care.

RESULTS

Of 8085 eligible encounters, 753 involved a palliative care consult. The likelihood of having a 30-day readmission did not differ between palliative care consult and usual care groups (p > 0.05). However, the palliative care consult group was more likely than usual care to have a hospice discharge (aRR = 4.09, 95% CI: 3.07-5.44). The predicted probability of 30-day readmission was lower when palliative care consultation was combined with hospice discharge compared to usual care or consultation with discharge to nonhospice postacute care (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of inpatient palliative care on readmissions in oncology is largely driven by hospice enrollment. Strategies that combine palliative care consultation with hospice discharge may decrease hospital readmissions and improve cancer care quality.

Race as a Predictor of Palliative Care Referral Time, Hospice Utilization, and Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Noncomparative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is associated with significant benefits, including reduced pain and suffering, an increased likelihood of patients dying in their preferred location, and decreased health-care expenditures. Racial and ethnic disparities are well-documented in hospice use and referral patterns; however, it is unclear whether these disparities apply to inpatient palliative care services.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if race is a significant predictor of time to inpatient palliative care consult, patient enrollment in hospice, and patients' overall hospital length of stay among patients of an inpatient palliative care service.

DESIGN

Retrospective noncomparative analysis.

SETTING

Urban academic medical center in the United States.

PATIENTS

3207 patients referred to an inpatient palliative care service between March 2006 and April 2015.

MEASUREMENTS

Time to palliative care consult, disposition of hospice/not hospice (excluding patients who died), and hospital length of stay among patients by racial (Asian, black, Native American/Eskimo, Hispanic, white, Unknown) and ethnic (Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic, Unknown) background.

RESULTS

Race was not a significant predictor of time to inpatient palliative care consult, discharge to hospice, or hospital length of stay. Similarly, black/white, Hispanic/white, and Asian/white variables were not significant predictors of hospice enrollment ( Ps > .05).

LIMITATIONS

Study was conducted at 1 urban academic medical center, limiting generalizability; hospital race and ethnicity categorizations may also limit interpretation of results.

CONCLUSIONS

In this urban hospital, race was not a predictor of time to inpatient palliative care service consult, discharge to hospice, or hospital length of stay. Confirmatory studies of inpatient palliative care services in other institutions are needed.

Top 10 Tips for Using Advance Care Planning Codes in Palliative Medicine and Beyond

Although recommended for all persons with serious illness, advance care planning (ACP) has historically been a charitable clinical service. Inadequate or unreliable provisions for reimbursement, among other barriers, have spurred a gap between the evidence demonstrating the importance of timely ACP and recognition by payers for its delivery.¹ For the first time, healthcare is experiencing a dramatic shift in billing codes that support increased care management and care coordination. ACP, chronic care management, and transitional care management codes are examples of this newer recognition of the value of these types of services. ACP discussions are an integral component of comprehensive, high-quality palliative care delivery. The advent of reimbursement mechanisms to recognize these services has an enormous potential to impact palliative care program sustainability and growth. In this article, we highlight 10 tips to effectively using the new ACP codes reimbursable under Medicare. The importance of documentation, proper billing, and nuances regarding coding is addressed.