Unmet Needs and Burden of Caregivers of Patients Being Evaluated for a Liver Transplant Are Similar to Those of Cancer Caregivers

BACKGROUND

The caregivers (CG) of patients with serious illnesses often experience stress and psycho-social issues. High burden is expected for CG of patients for whom liver transplant (LT) is the only curative option. This study aims to measure the burden, unmet needs, and quality of life (QoL) of CG of patients being evaluated for LT.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled CG of patients being evaluated for LT. CaTCoN (Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire) was used to assess caregiving consequences and needs related to interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs). ZBI-12 (Zarit Burden Interview) was used to assess CG burden, and PROMIS-29 (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) to assess QoL. Caregivers completed the study instruments in person, while they were in the clinic. CaTCoN scores from our study were compared with cancer caregivers' historical data.

RESULTS

18 CG were enrolled, mean age 54 [14] years; 72% were white and 77% were women. 61% worked full time; 45% provided >20 hours of care per week. Two-thirds cared for patients with alcoholic liver disease. All CaTCoN scores were no different from CGs of cancer patients (all P > .05). The total ZBI score (mean SD 12.4 [8.3]) did not differ from published scores for CG of cancer patients (12.0 [8.5]). 44% had high (≥12) ZBI scores reflecting "high burden." Their PROMIS-29 T scores, compared to those with low burden, showed more anxiety (P = .01), depression (P = .04), fatigue (P = .02) and deteriorated social function (P = .009). Physical function and social function were diminished among these CGs compared to the general population (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

CGs of patients being evaluated for LT suffer from high burden similar to cancer CGs and have reduced physical and social function. Despite the small sample size, the data completion rate was almost 100%.

Hepatopulmonary Syndrome and Portopulmonary Hypertension: Current Status and Implications for Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) are both pulmonary vascular complications of advanced liver disease; however, these syndromes have distinct pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

While both conditions are associated with portal hypertension, HPS results from diffuse pulmonary capillary vasodilation and PoPH results from vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling of pulmonary arteries. In HPS, no medical therapies clearly improve outcomes; however, patients have excellent post-LT outcomes with near uniform reversal of hypoxemia. In PoPH, several medical therapies used in idiopathic pulmonary hypertension have been shown improve pulmonary hemodynamics, symptoms, and potentially LT outcomes; however, further study is needed to determine best treatment regimens, long-term outcomes on medical therapy, and role of LT.

SUMMARY

While HPS results in severe hypoxemia that is usually reversible by LT, PoPH patients develop progressive pulmonary hypertension that may improve with medical therapy.

Low to Intermediate Dose Atropine Administration During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in the Pre-Liver Transplant Population

INTRODUCTION

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is frequently used to screen for obstructive coronary artery disease in the pre-liver transplant evaluation. Although atropine is a commonly used adjunctive medication, no study has evaluated its side effect profile in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD).

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the safety of atropine in candidates undergoing pre-liver transplant evaluation when atropine is used in stress testing?

DESIGN

This multicenter, prospective study enrolled patients over a 6-month period undergoing pre-liver transplant evaluation. Each patient completed a questionnaire assessing anticholinergic-related symptoms within 24 hours of testing and 48 hours following. Comparisons were made among patients receiving any atropine dose versus those who did not and among patients receiving at least 1 mg atropine and those receiving less/none.

RESULTS

Forty patients were evaluated, and 32 (80%) had adjunctive atropine administered. No differences in clinical characteristics were noted. In comparisons among patients receiving any dose of atropine with those who did not, questionnaire results indicated a higher rate of nausea prior to testing and higher overall symptom severity following testing in patients not receiving atropine. In comparisons among patients receiving less than 1 mg atropine with those receiving at least 1 mg atropine, no difference in pre- or posttesting questionnaire responses was present. No patient in the study required reversal agents or hospitalization within 7 days of testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Atropine, a hepatically metabolized medication, did not predispose patients with ESLD to an increased symptom burden, and clinical outcomes related to DSE were unaffected.

Clinical characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus patients being referred for liver transplant evaluation: a descriptive cohort study

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is a treatment option for select human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with advanced liver disease. The aim of this study was to describe LT evaluation outcomes in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

All HIV-infected patients referred for their first LT evaluation at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were included in this retrospective, descriptive cohort study. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with listing.

RESULTS

Between February 2000 and April 2012, 366 patients were evaluated for LT, with 66 (18.0%) listed for LT and 300 (82.0%) not listed. Fifty-one patients (13.9%) died before completing evaluation and 85 (23.2%) were too early for listing. Reasons patients were declined for listing were psychosocial (15.8%), HIV-related (10.4%), loss to follow-up (9.6%), surgical/medical (6.0%), liver-related (4.4%), patient choice (3.4%), and financial (1.6%). Listed patients were more likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (43.1% vs. 17.1%; P < 0.0001) and less likely to have hepatitis B (6.2% vs. 15.7%; P = 0.04) or a psychiatric history (19.7% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.02) than those not listed. In multivariable analysis, HCC (odds ratio [OR] 5.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.97-11.28), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at referral (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11), and hepatitis B (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.79) were associated with listing.

CONCLUSION

MELD score and HCC were positive predictors of listing in HIV-infected patients referred for LT evaluation and, therefore, timely referrals are vital in these patients. As MELD is a predictor for death while undergoing evaluation, rapid evaluation should be performed in HIV-infected patients with a higher MELD score.