Preliminary Screening Questionnaire for Sjögren's Syndrome in the Rheumatology Setting

OBJECTIVE

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is frequently undetected or misdiagnosed as other rheumatologic diseases. We aimed to develop an SS screening questionnaire for the rheumatology practice.

METHODS

We developed the Sjögren's Syndrome Screening Questionnaire (SSSQ) via secondary analysis of data from 974 participants referred by rheumatologists to the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) study. Participants answered 88 questions regarding symptoms, medical history, and demographics. They underwent ocular, dental, and serologic tests and were classified as SS or non-SS using the 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify questions most discriminative of SS, from which we derived an individual's likelihood of SS ("SSSQ score").

RESULTS

Five questions were significantly discriminative of SS in the multivariate analysis (p < 0.05): (1) Can you eat a cracker without drinking a fluid/liquid? (no: odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.82]); (2) How would you describe your dental and oral health in general? (fair/poor: OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04-2.75); (3) During the last week, have you experienced tearing? (none of the time: OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.23-4.34); (4) Are you able to produce tears? (no: OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.12-2.37); and (5) Do you currently smoke cigarettes? (no: OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.69-4.91). SSSQ score ≥7 (possible range, 0-11) distinguishes SS from non-SS patients with 64% sensitivity and 58% specificity (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The SSSQ is a simple 5-item questionnaire designed to screen for SS in clinical practice, with a potential impact to reduce delays in diagnosis.

Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears

Objective:

The objective of this study is to determine the clinical predictors of unsatisfactory Pap smears.

Methodology:

This was a case–control study done in a tertiary care institute. All unsatisfactory conventional pap (CP) smears between January 2015 and June 2017 were retrieved, and the slides were viewed. Clinical details were recorded from request forms and case files. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify the predictors of unsatisfactory CP smears.

Results:

In this study, we have included 314 unsatisfactory Pap smears and 541 controls with satisfactory Pap smears. Clinical parameters such as older age and cervical erosion proved to be important predictors of unsatisfactory pap smears. The most common reason for unsatisfactory pap smears was due to a paucity of epithelial elements (66.6%), followed by obscuration of smear details by blood/inflammatory cells/mucus (9.9%) and air drying artifacts (4.4%). There were multiple reasons in 19.1% of cases with unsatisfactory pap smears.

Conclusion:

Our study shows that older age groups and cervical erosion are predictors of unsatisfactory pap smears. Incidence of unsatisfactory pap smears can be reduced by education and retraining of health-care workers and doctors.

How many runners with new-onset Achilles tendinopathy develop persisting symptoms? A large prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendinopathy (AT) occurs in half of the elite runners. AT is a difficult-to-treat tendon disease, which may progress from new onset to a chronic state. It is unknown how many runners with new-onset AT develop persisting symptoms and which prognostic factors are associated with this course.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how many runners develop persisting symptoms 1 year after onset of reactive AT.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Runners registering for a Dutch running event (5-42.2 km) were eligible for inclusion. Runners reporting new-onset AT between registration for the running event and 1 month after received a 1-year follow-up questionnaire. The 1-year follow-up questionnaire inquired about persisting symptoms (yes/no), running activity, and metabolic disorders. We calculated the percentage of runners with persisting symptoms and performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to study the association between potential prognostic factors and persisting symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 1929 participants, 100 runners (5%) reported new-onset AT. A total of 62 runners (62%) filled in the 1-year follow-up questionnaire. Persisting symptoms were reported by 20 runners (32%). A higher running distance per week before new-onset AT was associated with a lower risk of developing persisting symptoms (odds ratio (OR): 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.9;1.0]). There was a positive trend toward an association between metabolic disorders and persisting symptoms (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: [0.9;36.2]).

CONCLUSION

One third of runners develop persisting symptoms 1 year after new-onset AT. Interestingly, a higher running distance per week before new-onset AT potentially lowers the risk of developing persisting symptoms.

Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Uncorrected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with long term morbidity such as gait abnormalities, chronic pain and degenerative arthritis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of different screening programmes for DDH on the incidence of late presentation of congenital hip dislocation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were performed in CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2011) supplemented by searches of clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, cross references and contacting expert informants.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster trials comparing the effectiveness of screening programmes for DDH.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent review authors assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

No study examined the effect of screening (clinical and/or ultrasound) and early treatment versus not screening and later treatment.One study reported universal ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery but was associated with a significant increase in treatment.One study reported targeted ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery, with no significant difference in rate of treatment.Meta-analysis of two studies found universal ultrasound compared to targeted ultrasound did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery. There was heterogeneity between studies reporting the effect on treatment rate.Meta-analysis of two studies found delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with unstable (but not dislocated) hips resulted in no significant difference in the rate of late diagnosed DDH. Both studies reported a significant reduction in treatment with use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting.One study reported delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with mild hip dysplasia on ultrasound resulted in no significant difference in late diagnosed DDH but a significant reduction in treatment. No infants in either group received surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to give clear recommendations for practice. There is inconsistent evidence that universal ultrasound results in a significant increase in treatment compared to the use of targeted ultrasound or clinical examination alone. Neither of the ultrasound strategies have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes including late diagnosed DDH and surgery. The studies are substantially underpowered to detect significant differences in the uncommon event of late detected DDH or surgery. For infants with unstable hips or mildly dysplastic hips, use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting reduces treatment without significantly increasing the rate of late diagnosed DDH or surgery.

Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making

PURPOSE

Many clinicians lack resources to engage patients in shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. We sought to evaluate whether previsit educational decision aids facilitate shared decision making.

METHODS

This randomized controlled study compared a Web-based and a paper-based decision aid with no previsit education. Men aged 50 to 70 years undergoing a health maintenance examination at a large family practice were enrolled. The primary outcome was patient-reported level of control over the decision to be screened. Secondary outcomes included frequency of screening, patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and time spent discussing screening.

RESULTS

A total of 497 men participated (75 control, 196 brochure, 226 Web site). Patients exposed to either aid were no more likely than control patients to report a collaborative decision: 36% of patients in each group reported equally sharing decision responsibility. Exposure to either decision aid increased patients' involvement in decision making compared with the control condition (Web site, P = .03; brochure, P = .03). Only 46% of control patients reported an active decision-making role, compared with 56% of Web site and 54% of brochure patients. Patients exposed to a decision aid answered a greater percentage of knowledge questions correctly (54% control vs 69% Web site, P <.001, and vs 69% brochure, P <.001) and were less likely to be screened (94% control vs 86% Web site, P = .06, and vs 85% brochure, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the decision aid groups were more informed and more engaged in the screening decision than their control counterparts. Exposure did not promote shared decision-making control, however. Whether shared decision making is the ideal model and how to measure its occurrence are subjects for further research.

How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit

PURPOSE

In 2004, a commentary by Merenstein was published in JAMA describing how he was sued for engaging a patient in shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. The article sparked considerable debate on the impact of litigation on medical care. A natural experiment (a study assessing shared decision making under way at the practice that was sued) enabled us to evaluate whether physicians changed their prostate cancer screening behavior after the lawsuit.

METHODS

As part of a randomized controlled trial conducted between January 2002 and November 2004, patients and physicians completed exit questionnaires about prostate cancer screening discussions after health maintenance examinations. We compared responses before, during, and after physicians became aware of the lawsuit.

RESULTS

A total of 432 of 497 patients completed questionnaires (180 before the practice became aware of the lawsuit, 87 as knowledge of the case diffused through the practice, and 165 after publication of Merenstein's commentary). Comparing patients' responses over the 3 time periods, there were no changes in the average locus of decision-making control, time spent discussing screening, number of screening topics discussed, knowledge scores, or decisional conflict. The frequency with which physicians reported performing prostate-specific antigen testing increased (before vs after: 84% vs 90%; P = .03), and physicians were more likely to report that they, rather than the patients, had made the screening decision (before vs after: 3.3% vs 11.1%; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The physicians in closest proximity to this well-known legal case continued to engage patients in shared decision making and to let patients decide whether to be screened. Prostate-specific antigen testing increased during this period.